Download Article (PDF)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Development of Forest Sector in the Arkhangelsk Oblast During the Transition Period of the 1990S
Development of forest sector in the Arkhangelsk oblast during the transition period of the 1990s ALBINA PASHKEVICH Pashkevich Albina (2003). Development of forest sector in the Arkhangelsk oblast during the transition period of the 1990s. Fennia 181: 1, pp. 13–24. Helsinki. ISSN 0015-0010. The Arkhangelsk oblast has long been one of Russia’s most important forest industrial regions. This paper analyses the changes in accessibility of forest resources and forest commodity production during the transition period in the 1990s. Special attention is given to firm restructuring, active roles of domestic capital and the different survival strategies that have been developed by in- dustries in the region. Further analysis deals with signs of economic recovery in the forest sector due to the processes of restructuring, modernisation and self-organisation. Albina Pashkevich, Spatial Modelling Centre (SMC), Department of Social and Economic Geography, Umeå University, Box 839, SE-98128 Kiruna, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected]. MS received 12 August 2002. Introduction adoption of a new. Some suggest that this proc- ess has been deeply embedded in the nature of The shift from central planning to a market-based the socialist system (Dingsdale 1999; Hamilton economy in Russia culminated with the dramatic 1999) and that the legacy of the communism has economic and political reorientation that began been only partly removed, and instead has mere- in the 1990s. This transition towards a market-ori- ly been reworked in a complex way (Smith 1997). ented and outward-looking economic system led Others say that reforms have actually ended the by private sector has created new challenges and old ‘command economy’ but have instead suc- opportunities. -
Arctic Marine Aviation Transportation
SARA FRENCh, WAlTER AND DuNCAN GORDON FOundation Response CapacityandSustainableDevelopment Arctic Transportation Infrastructure: Transportation Arctic 3-6 December 2012 | Reykjavik, Iceland 3-6 December2012|Reykjavik, Prepared for the Sustainable Development Working Group Prepared fortheSustainableDevelopment Working By InstituteoftheNorth,Anchorage, Alaska,USA PROCEEDINGS: 20 Decem B er 2012 ICElANDIC coast GuARD INSTITuTE OF ThE NORTh INSTITuTE OF ThE NORTh SARA FRENCh, WAlTER AND DuNCAN GORDON FOundation Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 5 Acknowledgments ......................................................................... 6 Abbreviations and Acronyms .......................................................... 7 Executive Summary ....................................................................... 8 Chapters—Workshop Proceedings................................................. 10 1. Current infrastructure and response 2. Current and future activity 3. Infrastructure and investment 4. Infrastructure and sustainable development 5. Conclusions: What’s next? Appendices ................................................................................ 21 A. Arctic vignettes—innovative best practices B. Case studies—showcasing Arctic infrastructure C. Workshop materials 1) Workshop agenda 2) Workshop participants 3) Project-related terminology 4) List of data points and definitions 5) List of Arctic marine and aviation infrastructure AlASkA DepartmENT OF ENvIRONmental -
RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1
RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1 No. 33 Summer 2003 Special issue: The Transformation of Protected Areas in Russia A Ten-Year Review PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (Letter from the Editors)......................................1 Ten Years of Teaching and Learning in Bolshaya Kokshaga Zapovednik ...............................................................24 BY WAY OF AN INTRODUCTION The Formation of Regional Associations A Brief History of Modern Russian Nature Reserves..........................2 of Protected Areas........................................................................................................27 A Glossary of Russian Protected Areas...........................................................3 The Growth of Regional Nature Protection: A Case Study from the Orlovskaya Oblast ..............................................29 THE PAST TEN YEARS: Making Friends beyond Boundaries.............................................................30 TRENDS AND CASE STUDIES A Spotlight on Kerzhensky Zapovednik...................................................32 Geographic Development ........................................................................................5 Ecotourism in Protected Areas: Problems and Possibilities......34 Legal Developments in Nature Protection.................................................7 A LOOK TO THE FUTURE Financing Zapovedniks ...........................................................................................10 -
Subject of the Russian Federation)
How to use the Atlas The Atlas has two map sections The Main Section shows the location of Russia’s intact forest landscapes. The Thematic Section shows their tree species composition in two different ways. The legend is placed at the beginning of each set of maps. If you are looking for an area near a town or village Go to the Index on page 153 and find the alphabetical list of settlements by English name. The Cyrillic name is also given along with the map page number and coordinates (latitude and longitude) where it can be found. Capitals of regions and districts (raiony) are listed along with many other settlements, but only in the vicinity of intact forest landscapes. The reader should not expect to see a city like Moscow listed. Villages that are insufficiently known or very small are not listed and appear on the map only as nameless dots. If you are looking for an administrative region Go to the Index on page 185 and find the list of administrative regions. The numbers refer to the map on the inside back cover. Having found the region on this map, the reader will know which index map to use to search further. If you are looking for the big picture Go to the overview map on page 35. This map shows all of Russia’s Intact Forest Landscapes, along with the borders and Roman numerals of the five index maps. If you are looking for a certain part of Russia Find the appropriate index map. These show the borders of the detailed maps for different parts of the country. -
Transport and Infrastructural Basis of the Tourism Development Strategy in the Arkhangelsk Oblast © Aleksandr Yu
Aleksandr Yu. TSVETKOV. Transport and infrastructural basis … 35 UDC [338.48+332.14](470.11)(045) DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.38.44 Transport and infrastructural basis of the tourism development strategy in the Arkhangelsk Oblast © Aleksandr Yu. TSVETKOV, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), associate professor E-mail: [email protected] Department of Management, Higher School of Economics, Management and Law, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Arkhangelsk, Russia Abstract. The article, devoted to the analysis of transport and geographical locations, describes possible strategies for the development of tourism in the Arkhangelsk Oblast. The main goal of the research was the development of logistic schemes of the transportation of tourists from the places of formation of tourist flows to the Arkhangelsk Oblast. The methodological basis of the article is to determine the economic dis- tances between potential tourist distribution centers and their places of interest in the area. Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Arkhangelsk were considered as the main towns of departure. Kargopol, Solvychegodsk, Kholmogory and Lomonosovo, Solovki, Kenozersky National Park, and Pinega caves are regarded as the main sites of tourist interest in the Arkhangelsk Oblast. It was determined that Kargopol is the most acces- sible for tourists, and Kenozersky National Park is the most recognizable by tourists but the least accessible. The object of world cultural heritage, the Monastery of the Transfiguration of the Saviour on Solovki is the most accessible for tourists from the territory of Karelia. It is recommended to optimize the schedule and to synchronize the work of transport for tourists to improve the transport accessibility of recreational facili- ties in the area. -
Monthly Discharges for 2400 Rivers and Streams of the Former Soviet Union [FSU]
Annotations for Monthly Discharges for 2400 Rivers and Streams of the former Soviet Union [FSU] v1.1, September, 2001 Byron A. Bodo [email protected] Toronto, Canada Disclaimer Users assume responsibility for errors in the river and stream discharge data, associated metadata [river names, gauge names, drainage areas, & geographic coordinates], and the annotations contained herein. No doubt errors and discrepancies remain in the metadata and discharge records. Anyone data set users who uncover further errors and other discrepancies are invited to report them to NCAR. Acknowledgement Most discharge records in this compilation originated from the State Hydrological Institute [SHI] in St. Petersburg, Russia. Problems with some discharge records and metadata notwithstanding; this compilation could not have been created were it not for the efforts of SHI. The University of New Hampshire’s Global Hydrology Group is credited for making the SHI Arctic Basin data available. Foreword This document was prepared for on-screen viewing, not printing !!! Printed output can be very messy. To ensure wide accessibility, this document was prepared as an MS Word 6 doc file. The www addresses are not active hyperlinks. They have to be copied and pasted into www browsers. Clicking on a page number in the Table of Contents will jump the cursor to the beginning of that section of text [in the MS Word version, not the pdf file]. Distribution Files Files in the distribution package are listed below: Contents File name short abstract abstract.txt ascii description of -
Nordic Working Papers
NORDIC WORKING PAPERS Bioeconomy in Northwest Russian region Forest- and waste-based bioeconomy in the Arkhangelsk region, Russia Anna Berlina and Alexey Trubin http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/NA2018-904 NA2018:904 ISSN 2311-0562 This working paper has been published with financial support from the Nordic Council of Ministers. However, the contents of this working paper do not necessarily reflect the views, policies or recommendations of the Nordic Council of Ministers. Nordisk Council of Ministers – Ved Stranden 18 – 1061 Copenhagen K – www.norden.org Forest‐ and waste‐based bioeconomy in the Arkhangelsk region, Russia Working Paper By Anna Berlina and Alexey Trubin, 2018 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 2 2 General description of the Arkhangelsk region ........................................................................... 3 3 Forest resources and their management ................................................................................... 4 4 Waste resources and their management .................................................................................... 7 5 Bioenergy production ............................................................................................................... 10 6 Support framework for bioeconomy in the Arkhangelsk region ................................................ 11 7 Key actors involved in the bioeconomic activities in the Arkhangelsk region ........................... -
Impact of Social Guarantees on Economics of the Russian Arctic
ISSN 0798 1015 HOME Revista ESPACIOS ! ÍNDICES ! A LOS AUTORES ! Vol. 39 (Number 26) Year 2018 • Page 14 Impact of social guarantees on economics of the Russian Arctic Impacto de las garantías sociales en economías del ártico ruso Elena N. BOGDANOVA 1 Received: 10/02/2018 • Approved: 10/03/2018 Content 1. Introduction 2. Methodology 3. Results 4. Conclusions Bibliographic references ABSTRACT: RESUMEN: Preferences for individuals living and working in the High North of Russia turned out to be Los beneficios personales de quienes viven y trabajan en el Norte de Rusia resultaron ser a heavy burden for the northern economics and primarily for commercial enterprises. una pesada carga para la economía del norte y principalmente para las empresas Entrepreneurs suffer from losses caused by obligatory extra social guarantees provided for comerciales. Los empresarios sufren de pérdidas causadas por garantías sociales women only. It increases remuneration of labor and cuts down the share of gross profit of adicionales obligatorias proporcionadas solo para mujeres. Aumenta la remuneración del the companies. The issue of extra-burden on the employers in the Arctic regions of Russia trabajo y reduce la participación del beneficio bruto de las empresas. La cuestión de la needs elaboration of support measures for entrepreneurs. carga adicional para los empleadores en las regiones árticas de Rusia necesita la Keywords: Social guarantees, Russian Arctic elaboración de medidas de apoyo para los empresarios. Palabras clave: garantías sociales, Ártico ruso 1. Introduction Economic development in Russia, especially in the Arctic regions, depends on many factors: state budgeting policy, investment climate for private companies and corporations, living conditions etc. -
Planned Protected Areas in the Arkhangelsk Region
PLANNED PROTECTED AREAS IN THE ARKHANGELSK Mezen REGION 23 atlantic salmon 8 whooper swan 13 16 14 Leshukonskoe 17 1 wild forest reindeer ARKHANGELSK 9 Новодвинск 12 Kholmogory freshwater 3 pearl mussel вrandt's nature reserve bat Karpogory Onega botanical garden nature park 11 2 nature monument tree lungwort 24 wild forest reindeer white-tailed eagle Bereznik Plesetsk 4 4 22 atlantic salmon Verkhnyaya Toyma Yarensk 10 15 Shenkursk 18 5 common lady’s slipper crane 19 orchid Nyandoma Kargopol Krasnoborsk 7 6 Koryazhma 21 20 Котлас Velsk Konosha Oktyabrsky 1 Verkhnechelassky 14 Sebboloto 2 15 Dvina-Pinega (Verkhneyulovsky) Lekshmokh At the moment the ecological assessments 3 Puchkomsky (expansion) 16 Dendrological (botanical) garden 4 Uftyuga-Ilesha “SevNIILH” of the Dvina-Pinega and Uftyuga-Ilesha 5 Atleka 17 Solzinsky Landscape Reserves have passed the state 6 Voloshsky 18 Shilovsky (expansion) environmental impact assessment. Also 7 Ustiansky (expansion) 19 Lake Churozero (correction the proposal to expand the Zelezhnye Vorota 8 Kuloysky (expansion) of borders) 20 Landscape Reserve has been approved. These 9 Onega coast Turovsky Les 21 10 Nature reserve in the Lensky district Kovzhinsky documents determine, among other things, 22 11 Zvozsky Soyginsky the borders, protection regimes and 23 12 Chugsky (expansion) Timansky conservation zones of the nature reserves. 24 13 Zheleznye Vorota (expansion) Klonovsky (expansion) Intact forest landscapes are Arkhangelsk Region has been shaped by optimal habitats for such coniferous forests, covering most of its animals as bears, pine martens, elks and territory. Its virgin forests, which have not capercaillies. been disturbed by human activities, play a key role in protecting populations of rare and threatened species. -
WSSG Newsletter39
NNeewwsslleetttteerr Number 39 December 2013 Newsletter 39 Compiled by Yves Ferrand Coordinator Office national de la chasse et de la faune sauvage Research Department Migratory Birds Unit 39, Bd Albert Einstein CS 42355 44323 Nantes Cedex - France December 2013 This Newsletter is published with financial assistance of Office national de la chasse et de la faune sauvage Compiled by Yves Ferrand Coordinator Office national de la chasse et de la faune sauvage Research Department Migratory Birds Unit 3 , Bd Albert Einstein CS 42355 44323 Nantes Cede) - France December 2013 This Ne.sletter is published .ith financial assistance of Office national de la chasse et de la faune sauvage This Newsletter seeks to be a contact organ to inform the members of the Woodcock and Snipe Specialist Group (WSSG), a research unit of Wetlands International (WI) and of IU N, the International Union for onservation of Nature. The subjects of WSSG are species of the genera Scolopax , Gallinago and Lymnocryptes that in several respects differ remarkably from all other wader species. For this reason a separate research unit was established. ONTENTS Page Editorial )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))...))))))))))))))3 2012 Belarus Woodcock Report ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))...4 E,WA., MONGIN , 0U.I 1OGUTS2I 3 E4ENA ,A5I,0ONO2 New studies of the Great Snipe population in Belarus))))))))))))))))))))))))..6 E,WA., MONGIN , 0U.I 1OGUTS2I 3 E4ENA ,A5I,0ONO2 Woodcock report from Hungar ! Spring 2013 ))))))))))))))))))))))))))...)8 GE.GE40 S 8A440 , 49S:4; S:EMET80 3 -
GIS-Practical Experience in the Boundaries Definition of The
Journal of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering 1 (2016) 19-24 D doi: 10.17265/2332-8223/2016.01.003 DAVID PUBLISHING GIS-Practical Experience in the Boundaries Definition of the Platform Deep Crustal Blocks on the Studying of the Earth’s Surface Fractal Divisibility: Example of the White Sea-Kuloi Plateau I. S. Sergeev St. Petersburg State University, Institute of Earth Sciences, Russia Abstract: This study examines the use of the geographic information systems (GIS) in structural geomorphology to build the model of the crust based on fractal analysis of relief. Fractal theory, developed by B. Mandelbrot, used to determination morpho-bloc divisibility of the Earth’s surface. There is the traceable statistically recurring relief structure indicate the appropriate tiered hierarchy of crustal blocks forming the tectonic and kinematic layers. This hypothesis tested on a digital elevation model (DEM) of the White Sea-Kuloi Plateau — an area of tectonic and magmatic activity of the Paleozoic era. Found the correlation of position the kimberlite magmatic bodies with the tectonic blocks certain depth according to a fractal analysis. Key words: Structural relief, tectonic blocs, geographic information systems, digital elevation model, fractal dimension. the existence of tectonic faults as the geological bodies. 1. Introduction This study based on the following position: tectonic At present days structural geomorphology defines fault is the boundary between certain moving volumes surface earth objects, “not daring” to look into the of the lithosphere, and, like in any boundary zone in depths of the earth. Geomorphology “given” this spatial development, it is the tectonic movement of the opportunity to geophysical sciences. -
The Last Interglacial-Glacial Cycle (MIS 5-2) Re-Examined Based on Long Proxy Records from Central and Northern Europe
Technical Report TR-13-02 The Last Interglacial-Glacial cycle (MIS 5-2) re-examined based on long proxy records from central and northern Europe Karin F Helmens Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University October 2013 Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co Box 250, SE-101 24 Stockholm Phone +46 8 459 84 00 ISSN 1404-0344 Tänd ett lager: SKB TR-13-02 P, R eller TR. ID 1360839 The Last Interglacial-Glacial cycle (MIS 5-2) re-examined based on long proxy records from central and northern Europe Karin F Helmens Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University October 2013 This report concerns a study which was conducted for SKB. The conclusions and viewpoints presented in the report are those of the author. SKB may draw modified conclusions, based on additional literature sources and/or expert opinions. A pdf version of this document can be downloaded from www.skb.se. Abstract A comparison is made between five Late Pleistocene terrestrial proxy records from central, temper- ate and northern, boreal Europe. The records comprise the classic proxy records of La Grande Pile (E France) and Oerel (N Germany) and more recently obtained records from Horoszki Duże (E Poland), Sokli (N Finland) and Lake Yamozero (NW Russia). The Sokli sedimentary sequence from the central area of Fennoscandian glaciation has escaped major glacial erosion in part due to non-typical bedrock conditions. Multi-proxy studies on the long Sokli sequence drastically change classic ideas of glaciation, vegetation and climate in northern Europe during the Late Pleistocene.