Melanesia in Review: Issues and Events, 2014

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Melanesia in Review: Issues and Events, 2014 Melanesia in Review: Issues and Events, 2014 New Caledonia and Papua are not reservations about holding an election reviewed in this issue. at all, accused sodelpa of exacerbat- ing ethnic divisions and of planning Fiji to release 2000 coup leader George The first nine months of 2014 in Speight, and said that Suva would not Fiji were dominated by preparations be allowed to “burn” again (rnzi, for the long-awaited 17 September 4 Sept 2014; Fiji Sun, 4 Sept 2014; election. In accordance with the fbc, 11 Sept 2014). Heroic interpreta- “Strategic Framework for Change” tions of the military’s response to the set out in July 2009, a new constitu- Speight coup of May 2000 had long tion had been put in place in 2013 been used to consolidate rank-and-file (see Fraenkel 2014), but the associ- control in the army (see Bainimarama ated electoral arrangements were 2014a). Now, in the context of the finalized only in March 2014. In the election campaign, these were used same month, Prime Minister Voreqe to remind the minority communities Bainimarama stepped down as about the risk of instability in the military commander and announced event of a poor showing for FijiFirst. the formation of his new politi- If the early September poll was cal party, FijiFirst. Also in March, correct, voter loyalties polarized in Rewa high chief Ro Teimumu Kepa the weeks before the polls, with the became leader of the main Opposi- smaller parties losing support. The tion party, the Social Democratic and final outcome gave FijiFirst 59.2 Liberal Party (sodelpa, formerly the percent of the national vote and 32 of Soqosoqo Duavata ni Lewenivanua the 50 parliamentary seats, a landslide [sdl]). Initial polls released by the Fiji victory. sodelpa had 15 seats and Sun’s Razor Research gave Bainima- 28.2 percent of the national vote. The rama a commanding 79 percent only other party to cross the 5 percent lead and suggested negligible sup- threshold was the National Federa- port for sodelpa (Fiji Sun, 2 March tion Party (nfp), which obtained the 2014), but these were widely consid- remaining 3 seats. The Fiji Labour ered untrustworthy. As the polling Party (flp), which had obtained 39.2 day drew closer, a Times-Tebbutt percent of the national vote in 2006, poll found 21 percent support for slumped to 2.4 percent. The People’s sodelpa and 45 percent for FijiFirst, Democratic Party (pdp)—a breakaway implying that the gap was narrow- from the flp—fared only slightly ing and encouraging expectations of better, with 3.2 percent. Predictably, a pre election surge in support for the given the high threshold, the two Opposition (Fiji Times, 6 Sept 2014). independents obtained few votes. In the heated atmosphere of early Owing to Fiji’s history of election- September, Bainimarama expressed triggered coups, fears of military inter- 508 political reviews • melanesia 509 vention inevitably lurked in the back- the election, it was announced that the ground during the 2014 campaign, or new commander was relocating to an at least they did so as long as the result office in Berkley Crescent, close to the was uncertain. Bainimarama’s replace- nerve centers of government (Fiji Sun, ment as military commander, former 12 June 2014). Land Force Commander Brigadier The 2014 election was fought using Mosese Tikoitoga, said in April that a new uniquely candidate-centered, the role of the Republic of Fiji Mili- open-list, proportional representa- tary Forces (rfmf) was to defend the tion (pr) system. Open-list systems by new constitution and that “whatever definition center on choices of politi- government the people choose, we will cal party as well as candidate, but support it.” However, he also warned Fiji’s ballot paper offered no obvious that “if people throw out the current party choice whatsoever. Only the constitution as current political parties candidates’ allotted numbers were are talking about—then they have visible on the ballot papers, not their thrown out the chance of avoiding party affiliations. Nevertheless, as in coups” (Islands Business, April 2014; Finland and Brazil, it was the party rnzi, 24 June 2014; FijiLive, 21 June tallies that were indirectly critical for 2014). The desire to keep the military determining how many seats each out of politics may have been genuine, party won. Individual candidate tallies but that commitment proved difficult were summed at the counting center to sustain, particularly for an institu- to reach party tallies, thus determining tion as intertwined with the fabric of how many seats each party obtained. Fijian life as the rfmf. In July, the Only after this calculation of party rfmf announced it was severing all seat entitlements did the highest intra- ties with former military officer and party personal votes determine which sodelpa candidate Ratu Suliano of each party’s candidates were elected Matanitobua after he appealed to the (for further detail on the difference people of Namosi to put obligations between open- and closed-list pr to the vanua (indigenous system) over systems, see ace 2015). Also unusu- loyalties to the rfmf (FijiLive, 31 July ally for open-list pr systems, the 2014 2014). Immunities for actions taken election was fought using a single during the 2006 coup and thereafter national constituency (see the discus- were entrenched in the 2013 Consti- sion by electoral commissioner Father tution and these were as vital to the David Arms of a model using three, RFMF senior command as they were to four, or five multimember constituen- the government leadership. Hence, the cies [Arms 2012]). The voting age was military top brass carefully guarded reduced from 21 to 18, and Fiji citi- its rehabilitated constitutional respon- zens residing in other countries were sibility “to ensure at all times, the for the first time entitled to vote. security, defence and well-being of Most importantly, this was Fiji’s Fiji and all Fijians” (Fiji Government first general election without commu- 2013, section 131 (2) [section 5 (1) nal rolls. Ever since 1929, Fiji’s gen- provides that “all citizens of Fiji shall eral elections had separated “Fijians,” be known as Fijians”]). Shortly before “Indians,” and “Others” by race, and 510 the contemporary pacific • 27:2 (2015) required each ethnic group to cast was convicted of exchange control ballots entailing choices of leaders fraud in early 2014, but eventu- within their communities (though ally—after the election—he avoided a often with supplementary votes cast fifteen-month prison term by paying in “cross-voting” [1966], “national” a fine of f$2 million (approximately [1972–1987], or “open” [1999–2006] us$1,080,000 in mid-2014). Without constituencies on a common roll). its longtime leader, the flp polled Within Fiji, this major 2014 change poorly. Its former strongholds in the was often misleadingly described as sugarcane belts of Ba (western Viti serving to “eliminate racial voting,” Levu) and Macuata (northern Vanua largely because the latter had been Levu) instead gave majority support to one of Bainimarama’s 2012 “non- FijiFirst. negotiable” provisions expected of Other would-be candidates were the new constitution (for a discussion also prohibited from contesting. of these deliberations, see Fraenkel sodelpa’s preferred representa- 2013). What the new electoral frame- tive for the Lau Islands, sacked civil work did do was remove the insti- servant Anare Jale, had his nomina- tutional endorsement of race-based tion rejected on the grounds that voting and end the long-standing (due to his termination) he had been gerrymander in favor of rural parts of working as a consultant in Solomon the country. Islands and thus was claimed not to Voter registration in 2014 was up be, as required under a belated July 23 percent over 2006 levels, partly amendment to the Electoral Decree, reflecting the new enfranchisement “ordinarily resident in Fiji for at least of those aged 18 to 21. Turnout 2 years immediately before being was also high, averaging 84 percent, nominated” (Fiji Government 2014, despite the abandonment of compul- section 23, paragraph 4[c]; pina, 4 sory voting. The 5 percent threshold Aug 2014). discouraged independents, who would Disagreement flared between the have needed 24,819 votes to gain Electoral Commission and Supervisor a single seat. If they failed to reach of Elections Mohammed Saneem after that threshold, votes for the smaller the latter decided to allow FijiFirst’s parties also entailed wasted votes. Praveen Bala Kumar to contest, The Electoral Decree forbade can- despite his being a public officer at the didates who had “been convicted of time of nomination, and to incorrectly any offence under any law for which disqualify one of the flp candidates the maximum penalty is a term of (rnzi, 23 Aug 2014; FijiLive, 23 imprisonment of 12 months or more” Aug 2014). The commission tried to (Fiji Government 2014, section 23, reverse both decisions, but the super- paragraph 4). That ruled out deposed visor said that their advice had come Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase, who too late (rnzi, 26 Aug 2014; Islands had served a one-year prison sentence Business, Aug 2014). The commis- in 2012–2013, and also disqualified sioners boycotted the announcement FLP leader and former Prime Minister of the National Candidate List on 23 Mahendra Chaudhry. Mr Chaudhry August and took the matter to court, political reviews • melanesia 511 though the case was dismissed on through Vesikula’s speech in Verata. the grounds that the three-day time The hornet’s nest had been stirred limit for objections was valid in law only on the prime minister’s return (High Court of Fiji 2014). The dispute to Suva, where the favored reaction briefly threatened to ruin the credibil- was punitive rather than political.
Recommended publications
  • MINUTES of Proceedings of Parliament at Suva on Monday, Twenty-Second Day of March, 2021
    PARLIAMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF FIJI _____________ MINUTES of Proceedings of Parliament at Suva on Monday, Twenty-second Day of March, 2021 1. The House met at 9.30 a.m. pursuant to adjournment. 2. Hon. Speaker took the Chair and read the Prayer. 3. MEMBERS PRESENT All Honourable Members were present except for the Hon. Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum, Hon. Osea Naiqamu and Hon. Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu. 4. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES The Leader of the Government in Parliament the Hon. Inia Seruiratu, moved that the Minutes of the sitting of Parliament held on Friday, 12 February 2021 as previously circulated, be taken as read and be confirmed. Motion seconded. Question put. Motion agreed to unanimously. 5. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE CHAIR Hon. Speaker welcomed all Honourable Members to the sitting and all those watching the live broadcast and the live streaming of the proceedings. Hon. Speaker informed all Honourable Members that the Standing Committee on Justice, Law and Human Rights would table its report on the following election- related Bills at a later sitting date – 1. Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2020; 1 2. Electoral (Registration of Voters) (Amendment) Bill 2020; and 3. Political Parties (Registration, Conduct, Funding and Disclosures) (Amendment) Bill 2020. 6. PRESENTATION OF PAPERS AND CERTAIN DOCUMENTS The Acting Attorney-General and Minister for Economy, Civil Service and Communications the Hon. Faiyaz Koya tabled the Mid-Year Fiscal Statement – Actual Expenditure from 1st August 2020 to 31st January 2021. The Hon. Speaker informed all Honourable Members that the electronic copy of the report would be made available to all Members and uploaded simultaneously on the Parliament website.
    [Show full text]
  • Hon Niko Nawaikula MP, Scrutiny Of
    Australia-New Zealand Scrutiny of Legislation Conference Perth, Western Australia, 11 - 14 July 2016 PARLIAMENTARY SCRUTINY, PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY: WHERE ARE WE NOW AND WHERE ARE WE HEADED? Australia- New Zealand Scrutiny of Legislation Conference Scrutiny of Legislation and Parliamentary Sovereignty – The Fiji Experience Niko Nawaikula 1. Preliminary Note At the outset let me say that in this conference, I am attending as part of Fiji’s delegation but unlike my colleagues I am from the opposition side in parliament. I therefore have a different opinion of the situation in Fiji from my colleagues who are members of the Government and they will have the chance to rebut my views. I express my opinion however with the greatest respect to them and to the government of Fiji 2. Some Background Facts On Fiji Parliaments There are some background information that you will all need to know in order to understand and appreciate how things are playing out in Fiji’s current Parliament as concerns this topic of Parliamentary Scrutiny of Legislation and Parliamentary Sovereignty. It is therefore important to know these facts as a backdrop Firstly we who are attending here as delegates from Fiji are members of Fijis First ever Parliament to be convened under its new 2013 Constitution. This first parliament was established in October of 2014 after the first ever election under Fijis 2013 Constitution. Before this, there was operating another parliament that was established under a different constitution, namely the 1997 Constitution, which was abrogated by the perpetrators of a coup in 2006. That other Parliament under the 1997 Constitution had sat for a total of 3 separate terms; the first was immediately after Fiji’s election in 1999 under the 1997 constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Country Review
    Fiji 2016 Country Review http://www.countrywatch.com Table of Contents Chapter 1 1 Country Overview 1 Country Overview 2 Key Data 4 Fiji 5 Pacific Islands 6 Chapter 2 8 Political Overview 8 History 9 Political Conditions 10 Political Risk Index 42 Political Stability 57 Freedom Rankings 72 Human Rights 84 Government Functions 87 Government Structure 92 Principal Government Officials 100 Leader Biography 101 Leader Biography 101 Foreign Relations 104 National Security 109 Defense Forces 111 Chapter 3 114 Economic Overview 114 Economic Overview 115 Nominal GDP and Components 117 Population and GDP Per Capita 118 Real GDP and Inflation 119 Government Spending and Taxation 120 Money Supply, Interest Rates and Unemployment 121 Foreign Trade and the Exchange Rate 122 Data in US Dollars 123 Energy Consumption and Production Standard Units 124 Energy Consumption and Production QUADS 125 World Energy Price Summary 126 CO2 Emissions 127 Agriculture Consumption and Production 128 World Agriculture Pricing Summary 130 Metals Consumption and Production 131 World Metals Pricing Summary 133 Economic Performance Index 134 Chapter 4 146 Investment Overview 146 Foreign Investment Climate 147 Foreign Investment Index 151 Corruption Perceptions Index 164 Competitiveness Ranking 175 Taxation 184 Stock Market 184 Partner Links 185 Chapter 5 186 Social Overview 186 People 187 Human Development Index 188 Life Satisfaction Index 192 Happy Planet Index 203 Status of Women 213 Global Gender Gap Index 215 Culture and Arts 225 Etiquette 227 Travel Information 228 Diseases/Health Data 237 Chapter 6 243 Environmental Overview 243 Environmental Issues 244 Environmental Policy 252 Greenhouse Gas Ranking 253 Global Environmental Snapshot 264 Global Environmental Concepts 275 International Environmental Agreements and Associations 289 Appendices 314 Bibliography 315 Fiji Chapter 1 Country Overview Fiji Review 2016 Page 1 of 327 pages Fiji Country Overview FIJI Fiji became independent in 1970 after nearly a century as a British colony.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 EXPLANATORY NOTE This Is the Report of the Commonwealth
    EXPLANATORY NOTE This is the Report of the Commonwealth Observer Group which was present for the General Election in Fiji Islands, held from 6 to 13 May 2006. The Group’s report is reproduced here in the form in which it was signed by the Observers prior to their departure from Suva on 21 May 2006. It was transmitted to the Commonwealth Secretary- General on Friday 2 June 2006. During the following week he sent it to the Prime Minister of Fiji Islands, the Chairman of the Electoral Commission, the Supervisor of Elections, the leaders of the main political parties and Commonwealth governments. It was placed on this web-site and released to the media on Monday 12 June 2006. Printed copies are available from: Democracy Section Political Affairs Division Commonwealth Secretariat Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HX United Kingdom Tel: +44 207 747 6407/6397/6398 Fax: +44 207 930 2189 • Please note that the page numbers shown on the contents page relate to the printed version of the report. Only Annexes II and IV are shown. The others will be added at a later date. 1 Fiji Islands General Election 6-13 May 2006 REPORT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OBSERVER GROUP 2 CONTENTS Page Letter of Transmittal CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION 1 Invitation 1 Terms of Reference 1 Activities of the Group 2 CHAPTER TWO – POLITICAL BACKGROUND 4 Brief Historical Background 4 Political Overview 4 The Development of the 1997 Constitution 5 1999 Elections 6 2000 George Speight Coup 6 Commonwealth Engagement 7 2001 Election and Section 99 (5) of the Constitution 7 Talanoa Process 8 CMAG Meeting
    [Show full text]
  • East-West Center Annual Report 2003
    EAST-WEST CENTER ANNUAL REPORT 2003 THE EAST-WEST CENTER was established by the United States Congress in 1960 to “promote better relations and understanding between the United States and the nations of Asia and the Pacific through cooperative study, education, and research.” To support this mission, the Center’s programs focus around a specific institutional goal—to assist in creating an Asia Pacific community. Research, dialogue, educational activities, and public outreach incorporate both the Center’s mission and the programmatic focus of building an Asia Pacific community. The Center works to strengthen relations in the region and serves as a national and regional resource for information and analysis on Asia and the Pacific. It provides a meeting ground where people with a wide range of perspectives exchange views on topics of regional concern. Center staff members work with collaborating institutions and specialists from throughout the region. Since its founding more than 50,000 people have participated in Center programs. Many of these participants now occupy key positions in government, business, journalism, and education in the region. Officially known as the Center for Cultural and Technical Interchange Between East and West, the East-West Center is a public, nonprofit national and regional research and education institution with an international board of governors. Funding comes from the U.S. government in addition to support provided by private agencies, individuals and corporations, and a number of Asian and Pacific governments. Located in Honolulu, three miles from Waikiki and adjacent to the University of Hawai‘i, the Center’s 21-acre campus includes conference facilities, a research and administration office building, and three residential halls.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiji Elections: Bainimarama Rebuked but Returned
    Published on November 16, 2018 Officials at work in the results centre for the Fiji election (Credit: ABC News/Michael Barnett) Fiji elections: Bainimarama rebuked but returned By Stewart Firth Fiji went to the polls on 14 November in its second election since the restoration of democracy in 2014. Fiji’s experience with democracy since independence in 1970 has been a tortured one. Three coups have interrupted democratic government in the last thirty years – in 1987, 2000 and 2006 – and the last was followed by eight years of military Link: https://devpolicy.org/fiji-elections-20181116/ Page 1 of 6 Date downloaded: September 30, 2021 Published on November 16, 2018 rule, with Frank Bainimarama as self-appointed Prime Minister. Bainimarama then led his Fiji First party to victory in the 2014 elections and became the elected Prime Minister under a constitution of his own devising. A kind of stability has since settled on Fiji, though the country has not returned to democracy in its fullest sense, that is with a fully independent judiciary and media. Instead, people who cast their vote on 14 November knew that unless they returned the Bainimarama Government, another coup was possible. The victory of Bainimarama’s Fiji First party was predicted in the polls and likely given the arithmetic of Fiji elections. With a large majority of Indo-Fijians supporting him, Bainimarama needed only to gain the backing of a minority of indigenous Fijians to win. Indo-Fijian voters remain grateful to Bainimarama for overturning a pro-indigenous Fijian government in the 2006 coup, and for abolishing Fiji’s racially-skewed system of voting under which race was a key category.
    [Show full text]
  • 18 February 199Ï GATT Office Circular Mo. 341/Corr.L LIST OP LIAISON
    I 18 February 199Ï GATT Office Circular Mo. 341/Corr.l LIST OP LIAISON OFFICERS AND REPRESENTATIVES Corrigendum Please insert the attached pages in GATT Office Circular No. 341. They should replace the pages bearing the corresponding numbers. To enable staff members to know immediately where the change appears, a cross is indicated against the country concerned. Circulaire intérieure du GATT No. 341/Corr.l LISTE DES CHARGES DE LIAISON ET DBS REPRESENTANTS Corrigendum Prière d'insérer les pages ci-jointes dans la Circulaire intérieure du GATT No. 341 à la place des pages portant les mêmes numéros. Pour permettre aux fonctionnaires de savoir immédiatement où il y a un changement, une croix est placée à côté du nom du pays concerné. Circular interior del GATT N.° 341/Corr.l LISTA DE LOS FONCIONARIOS DE ENLACE Y REPRESENTANTES Corrigendum Se ruega insertar las paginas adjuntas en la circular interior del GATT N.° 341 en sustituciôn de las de numeraciôn équivalente. Para que los funcionarios puedan saber inmediatamente dônde hay cambios, se ha colocado una cruz al lado del nombre del pais correspondiente. 93-0215 No. 341 Page 13 27 January 1993 ESPANA (Sp) + (F) Excmo. Sr. Fernando-Martin Valenzuela Embajador Représentante Permanente de Espafta ante la Oficina de las Naclones Unldas en Ginebra Avenue Blanc 53 1202 Genève Tel: 731 22 30 731 22 39 Telex: 412 777 mpeg ch 289 951 degve ch Telefax: 731 53 70 Sr. Juan Antonio Castillo Consejero (Asuntos Comerciales) Représentante Permanente Adjunto Misiôn permanente de Espafia Avenue Blanc 49 1202 Genève Tel: 732 85 93 732 86 45 732 87 92 Telex: 41 23 00 ofcom ch Telefax: 738 64 76 Oficina Agricultura Tel: 738 42 06 Telefax: 738 45 37 FINLAND (E) H.E.
    [Show full text]
  • View Order Paper
    PARLIAMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF FIJI _____________ ORDER PAPER Tuesday, 26 May 2020 at 9.30 a.m. 1. Prayer 2. Confirmation of Minutes. The Leader of the Government in Parliament to move – “That the Minutes of the sitting of Parliament held on Monday, 25 May 2020, as previously circulated be taken as read and be confirmed.” 3. Communications from the Chair 4. Presentation of papers and certain documents 5. Presentation of reports of committees 6. Ministerial Statements 7. Consideration of Bills 8. Motions for which notice has been given (see Schedule 1) 9. Questions (see Schedule 2) ----------------- SCHEDULE 1 — MOTIONS FOR DEBATE 1. Hon. Sanjay Kirpal to move – “That Parliament debates the ‘2013-2014 Consolidated Annual Review of the Water Authority of Fiji’ which was tabled on 4 April 2019.” (Parliamentary Paper No. 19 of 2019) 2. Hon. Viam Pillay to move – “That Parliament debates the ‘Report on Annual Review of the Fiji Association of Sports and National Olympic Committee, 2017’ which was tabled on 1 April 2019.” (Parliamentary Paper No. 05 of 2019) 3. Hon. Prof. Biman Prasad to move – “That Parliament forms a Special Committee under Standing Order 129 to conduct a holistic inquiry into all aspects of health and medical care service and delivery at our public hospitals and centres and the Committee shall comprise the following – (a) Hon. Dr Salik Govind (Chairperson); (b) Hon. Alexander O’Connor; (c) Hon. Jale Sigarara; (d) Hon. Dr Ratu Atonio Lalabalavu; and (e) Hon. Lenora Qereqeretabua.” 4. Hon. Ro Filipe Tuisawau to move – “That Parliament resolves to establish a Special Committee under Standing Order 129 to inquire into the socio-economic impact of COVID- 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Student Economic Review, Vol. 20, 2006, pg. 189 REFORM OF THE EU SUGAR REGIME AND ITS IMPACT ON DEVELOPING COUNTRIES EOGHAN O’BRIAIN Senior Sophister The negative repercussions of the reform of the EU sugar regime on the Irish sugar industry has been well publicised. Eoghan O’Briain analyses the effect this reform will have on different groups of developing countries. He finally concludes that it is not the EU sugar farmers that will suffer most but the poor producers in developing countries. Introduction ‘The Commission’s proposal does not take our situation into account in any way. It is completely at odds with EU development policy, the general objectives of the Doha Development Round, and the pursuit of the UN Millennium Development Goals’ Kaliopate Tavola, Minister for Foreign Affairs and External Trade of Fiji (ACP, 2005b:1) On November 24th 2005 EU agricultural ministers reached agreement on the details of the June 2005 Commission proposal to reform the Common Market Organisation (CMO) for sugar. I will outline the details of this agreement, before examining its likely impact on various groups of developing countries. This question is important in light of the EU’s stated ambition of achieving the Millennium Development Goals by 2015. The essay informs the debate on preference erosion, an issue of major concern to developing countries at the recent WTO Ministerial in Hong Kong. I will examine the reaction of developing countries to this proposed reform, and investigate, whether the EU’s package is fair in terms of its effect on developing countries. I will conclude that the EU has neglected its responsibilities to some of the world’s most vulnerable economies, in its haste to compensate politically powerful EU sugar farmers.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The People Have Spoken …'
    1 ‘The People Have Spoken …’ Steven Ratuva and Stephanie Lawson Fiji’s general elections of 17 September 2014, held eight years after Fiji’s fourth coup, saw some significant firsts, generated largely by new constitutional arrangements. These included a radically deracialised electoral system in which the entire country forms a single electorate and utilises open-list proportional representation. This system, brought in under the regime of coup leader Voreqe (Frank) Bainimarama, was designed first and foremost to encourage a shift away from previous patterns of electoral behaviour which, due in large measure to provisions for communal electorates and voting, were inevitably attuned to communal political identities and the perceived interests attached to them. Elections under such a system certainly allowed ‘the people’ to speak, but in a way which gave primacy to those particular identities and interests and, arguably, contributed to a political culture that saw democracy itself severely undermined in the process. This was illustrated only too clearly by the recurrence of coups d’état between 1987 and 2006 that all revolved, in one way or another, around issues of communal identity expressed through discourses of indigenous Fijian (Taukei) rights versus those of other ethnic or racial communities, especially of those of Indian descent. These discourses remain highly salient politically but, under the Constitution promulgated by the Bainimarama regime in 2013, they are no longer supported institutionally via electoral arrangements. As a result, political parties have generally been forced to at least 1 THE PEOPLE Have SPOKEN attempt to appeal to all ethnic communities. These institutional changes have brought Fiji’s political system much closer to the standard model of liberal democracy in which ‘one person, one vote, one value’ is a basic norm.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiji 2020 Human Rights Report
    FIJI 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fiji is a constitutional republic. In 2018 the country held general elections, which international observers deemed free, transparent, and credible. Josaia Voreqe (Frank) Bainimarama’s Fiji First party won 27 of 51 seats in parliament, and he began a second four-year term as prime minister. The Fiji Police Force maintains internal security. The Republic of Fiji Military Force is responsible for external security but may also have some domestic security responsibilities in specific circumstances. Both report to the Ministry of Defense, National Security, and Policing. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces. Members of the security forces committed numerous abuses. Significant human rights issues included: cases of cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment, in some cases leading to death; restrictions on free expression, such as substantial interference with the right of peaceful assembly; and trafficking in persons. The government investigated some security force officials who committed abuses and prosecuted or punished officials who committed abuses elsewhere in the government; however, impunity was a problem in cases with political implications. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary Deprivation of Life and Other Unlawful or Politically Motivated Killings In April, four corrections officers at the Lautoka Corrections Center allegedly murdered one remand prisoner and assaulted two others. The officers were arrested and charged; on September 15, a court granted the officers bail. As of year’s end, the trial had not yet opened. b. Disappearance There were no reports of disappearances by or on behalf of government authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Rights, Representation and Legitimacy in Fiji Politics
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Australian National University The Fiji Election of 2014: Rights, Representation and Legitimacy in Fiji Politics Stewart Firth Fiji’s 2014 election was its first in eight years, first under the 2013 constitution, and first using a common roll of electors with proportional representation. In the new parliament of 50 seats, the coup leader of 2006, Frank Bainimarama, emerged triumphant. His Fiji First party won 32 seats, with SODELPA, a successor party to earlier indigenous Fijian parties, winning 15 and the National Federation Party three. The election of the new parliament marked the end of Fiji’s longest period under a military government since independence. How should we judge the significance of these elections in the context of Fiji’s history? Do they represent the breakthrough to democratic stability that so many Fiji citizens have wanted for so long? Or are they just another phase of Fiji’s turbulent politics, a democratic pause before another lurch into authoritarian government? In his message to the nation on Fiji Day, 10 October 2014, the President Ratu Epeli Nailatikau saw recent events as holding great hope for the future. He talked of 1987 as the ‘beginning of a cycle of instability, division and hatred – four disruptions to parliamentary rule, a rebellion in the military and in 2000, the detention of our elected representatives for 56 days’. History had now come full circle, he said, as the new members of parliament ‘gathered in precisely the same place where the first coup happened 27 years ago’, and as the nation finally put this era behind it.1 This article explores three recurring themes in the history of Fiji’s politics and in the light of the recent election: rights, representation and legitimacy.
    [Show full text]