DOCSLIB.ORG

Holmdel Township M0 R R 0 W Pl a N N I Ng As S 0 C I Ate S, C0 N S U L T an Ts Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Holmdel Township M0 R R 0 W Pl a N N I Ng As S 0 C I Ate S, C0 N S U L T an Ts Master Plan ALEX ~IscNJ JIJ J ~~~~~~~jj~jjfi]Jjj~~~~jjj ~[(J~mJIIJIJ~IJJ .H65 3 9030 04116600 2 1958 HOLMDEL TOWNSHIP M0 R R 0 W PL A N N I NG AS S 0 C I ATE S, C0 N S U L T AN TS MASTER PLAN for Holmdel Township, New Jersey Prepared for the Planning Board of Holmdel Township Morrow Planning Associates, Consultants 31 East Ridgewood Avenue Ridgewood, New Jersey MORROW PLANNING ASSOCIATES Mailing Address: 3 I East Ridgewood Ave., Ridgewood, New Jersey Gilbert 4-4450 C. Earl Morrow AlP FASLA Donald J. Irving AlP December 1958 To the Officials and Citizens of Holmdel: We are pleased to present the Master Plan for Holmdel. containing proposals for the future development of the Town­ ship and methods of effectuating these plans. An exceptional opportunity - and obligation - belongs to the residents of Holmdel. With approximately 80 per cent of the Township in open land, it is inevitable that new growth will occur in the coming years. Continuous effort must be exerted to direct this growth along lines that will conserve and improve upon existing values. The Master Plan is just the beginning of planning and should be considered only as a guide for future growth. The end product will be the living conditions that result as land ia developed. Respectfully submitted, C. Earl Morrow ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Planning Board Mr. Bernard Goldsmith, Chairman Mr. William J. Duncan, Secretary Mr. William Barclay Harding, Chairman of Master Plan Committee Mr. James H. Ackerson, Mayor Mr. Ernest E. Peseux, Township Committee Mr. Daniel Ely, Township Clerk Mr. John D. Wilding, Board of Education Mr. Harold Cantrell Mr. Albert B. Flemmer Mrs. Malcolm Peseux, Clerk Also Mr. Edwin Liebenow, Township Committee Mr. Frank Bunting Mr. Francis Stanhope Mr. J. Frank Weigand, Township Attorney Mr. Otis Seaman, Township Engineer Mr. Walter Smale, Building Inspector Mr. John Mount, Tax Assessor Mrs. Stanley Stillwell, Tax Collector Mr. Jerry Allocco, Highway Department Mrs. Helen Ackerson, Superintendent of Schools Mr. George Kinkade, Secretary of Board of Education Mr. Charles M. Pike, Monmouth County Planning Director The preparation of this report was financed in part through an urban planning grant from the Housing and Home Finance Agency, under the provisions of Section 701 of the Housing Act of 1954, as amended. It was prepared under contract with the Department of Conservation and Economic Development of the State of New Jersey. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I Summary of Existing Conditions 1 II Population Forecast 4 III Proposals 7 Future Land Use 8 Circulation 12 Public Facilities 19 IV Methods of Effectuation 28 ILL UST RAT IONS Figure 1 General Reference Map 2 Population Forecast 3 Future Land Use Plan 4 Circulation and Public Facilities Plan 1 SECTION I SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS During the past 18 months, two detailed reports on existing conditions in Holmdel have been presented to the Planning Board. Highlights of the information contained in these progress reports follow. PHYSICAL CONDITIONS The natural character of the land and existing improvements upon it will affect the patterns of future growth. The General Reference Map (Figure 1) shows land elevations at 20-foot contour intervals, streams and marshes. It also shows streets, rail lines, and buildings, classified according totype of use. Steep slopes in much of the central portion of the Township will limit its use. Because of the expense of laying roads and utilities on the slopes, the most logical use of this area will be for scattered private residences on large plots. Less conspicuous problems, which influence land use, are the soil conditions. In most of the low-lying areas of the Township, imperfect drainage characteristics and load-bearing conditions of the soil will necessitate public utilities (water supply, sewage treatment, and storm drain systems) before this land can be used intensively. Special considerations for laying roadbeds may also be needed. DI GENERAL REFERENCE MAP ·--.--- SCALE IN FEET ' '- LEGEND • RESIDENCE A. BUSINESS • INDUSTRY ,,.o·o- s SCHOOL 0 r M MUNICIPAL BUILDING ('T'\ -4 0 REFUSE DISPOSAL 0 :E F FIREHOUSE ~~~~\~~~~~z E ELECTRICITY SUBSTATION G GAS SUBSTATION N NURSING HOME H HEALTH SERVICE C CHURCH I I l CEMETERY '\ l_h PROPERTY LINES I ' \ I I ~~::;7 SWAMP , / ~~ , ' -- I ~ GRAVEL PIT --~~ :E MARCH 1958 z (/) CONTOUR INTERVAL• 20 FEET SOURCE OF DATA= U.S. ARMY ENGINEERS MAPS, GARDEN STATE PARKWAY MAPS, SUBDIVISION RECORDS, FIELD INVESTIGATION THE PLANNING BOARD TOWNSHIP OF HOLMDEL Fl G U R E CONSULTANTS: MORROW PLANNING ASSOCIATES -~~~--------------------------------------------_.--~------------------------------------------- 2 EXISTING LAND USE Table I below shows, in generalized form, the amount of land in each use at the present time. The General Reference Map will be helpful in locating these uses. TABLE I Existing Land Uses Acres % Residence 602 5.25 Business 43 .38 Industry 440 3.84 Railroad 23 .20 Public Streets 228 2.00 Public and Semipublic Properties 59 .51 Garden State Parkway 594 5.18 U. S. Government 143 1.25 Agriculture 6,163 53.80 Vacant 3,161 27.59 Total 11,456 acreslOO.OO% FISCAL CONDITIONS In the past five years, there has been a constantly growing need for additional tax dollars to balance increased costs for municipal, school, and county operations. During the period from January 1954 to December 1958, the total tax levy {municipal, school, and county) increased by 148 per cent. Part of this increase is the result of providing additional 3 services demanded by a growing population - such as schools, road improvements, recreation, etc. However, a large portion of the increase is simple due to inflation. The trend, unfortunately, indicates no reduction of costs in the foreseeable future. 4 SECTION II POPULATION FORECAST Population trends in the New Jersey - New York Metropolitan Region indicate a movement of people from the central counties of the Region to outlying areas, such as Monmouth County. By 1975, the Monmouth County population is expected to increase from a present estimate of 326,730 to nearly 600,000 persons. It is expected that this population pressure will be felt in Holmdel - especially since there are many acres of open land suitable for residential use. FORECASTING Forecasts of the total Holmdel population to 1980 were made by several methods: 1 - relationship to forecasts for the county, state, and nation; 2 - relationship to forecasts for the Metropolitan Region; 3 - consideration of migration and natural increase. In making forecasts, it was assumed that current economic and sociological trends would continue. Any significant alteration in these trends would, of course, have a marked influence on any fore­ cast. From the preliminary forecasts made by the methods listed above, a final composite forecast was derived. It was then compared with forecasts for Holmdel made by the County and by the Regional 5 Plan Association. It was also analyzed in relation to the proposed land use plan. The forecast is shown (Figure 2) as a range - from a low, conservative figure of 12,000 to a high of 13,900 persons in 1980 - rather than as a specific population number. SCHOOL-AGE FORECAST In order to provide for the educational needs of the increasing number of children, it is necessary to estimate enrollments which can be expected in the future. It is possible to project school enrollments for a short term ahead with a fair degree of accuracy, since many of these children are already in the school system. Long-term forecasts (shown on the Population Forecast) must be more general. TABLE II School Enrollments School Year Grades Beginning Sept. 1 - 8 9 - 12 1 - 12 1958 368 93 461 1959 509 95 604 1960 519 123 642 1961 602 144 746 1962 692 167 859 Here again, it must be noted that any significant changes, such as a major alteration in zoning policy or any new parochial or private schools enrolling a large number of Holmdel children, will affect these school enrollment forecasts. POPULATION FORECAST HOLMDEL TOWNSHIP, N.J. 20,000 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 z 0 1- <t 10,000 .J ::> Q. 0 Q. 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 J ..... ,... TOTAL POPULATION V 0~~~ :;,.....,-~..--lllt----t---i ~--~----~~~~--1-----r ~~~~~~- .___~~,~ 0 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 19~ 1960 1970 1980 ·~ 2000 YEAR NOVEMBER 1958 CONSULTANTS• MORROW PLANNING ASSOCIATES FIGURE 2 6 In addition to the obvious need for classroom space to ac­ commodate these children, there will also be increased demands for playgrounds and other recreational facilities. Annual projections of expected school enrollments, several years in advance, will enable prudent programming of school facilities for the years immediately ahead. It is important, also, to forecast for the long run, in order to anticipate heavy expendi­ tures for school purposes rather than to be surprised by them. If present trends continue unabated, enrollments in grades 1 through 12 of 2,000 to 2,350 students mught be expected in 1980. 7 SECTION III PROPOSALS OBJECTIVES • The Master Plan or Comprehensive Development Plan is a composite of proposals for the future uses of land, for future street patterns, and for future public facilities. These proposals should be viewed as part of an integrated plan and should be considered in terms of their cumulative aims . The Master Plan is intended to serve as a guide for ap­ proximately 25 years . The Master Plan should - as far as possible - anticipate the community's needs and guide future growth in an economical and efficient manner . The Master Plan is not a rigid set of specifications; it is a statement of aims and policies. As such, the Master Plan should be considered flexible enough to allow for unforeseen changes that will occur . The Future Land Use Proposals in the Master Plan do not necessarily recommend immediate changes to the zoning ordinance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Westfield Leader
    o o r- o aL O Z « < THE WESTFIELD LEADER »-« O fi J The Leading and Most Widely Circu(nl<<l Weekly Xeuspaper In Union County HUIII. _J I- l-sl'S liSdn NIC \K, NO. 19 Si'i 1 l'lr.»« Pom WFST1 ll-l I), Nl-.W II KM \ IIH'KSDA'i IJM I Mllt-K II. I WO 2Ci I'itk's--20 dim in XVoHlllfdl. To Reconsider Move P-Zone To Lincoln School Alter receiving a list ol building ..'p In <i;: 1 <•. Restrictions ! uas .lilhrtrawn when more thai) 2u educational liclllail\ - N' rsi-.-i" inirigi plant. nei(i|](tors protested a improvement proposals lor a lid to (>i i). I<]I- .ilhn indour /niiiii(> >. anance approval lo Ihe 11>81-H2 school operating garage. AI|I luc•'e' ''' ll(' make the huiliiilin into a budget. Wesllicld Hoard o! pn-M'tlled to board lor i•iiiiipuicr ceuler v, ill) 1 Irk Professionals Kduca I ion President }*.n kirij. IMI employees j Thomas I1' Sullivan asked Hallleluies an lorn IH lili' lollglh'. Olll .ii •: .• ' - po.h lK-Ki "We seen an\ 'I'lii' board president .said lor 'A hat is billed h\ I yl pecli-d lo be Illiall/i 'i ai.-l Ihe school board to roenn- 1 n of serious cier " t N ihe Kim •ial he lell (oniioereial 01 WIIINIJUS Joc;tl .iltorliey. a;is The pi oles-.n.:i,, 1 /• ••• <i!.i'. SI sider some decisions il has 1 1 Street bc fh<• buuil iiiiconiiiierci,il use ol ;in> .1 "leal war eoJiiplele •>'.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for Guiding Transportation Improvements to Support Desired Land Use
    New Jersey Institute of Technology Digital Commons @ NJIT Dissertations Electronic Theses and Dissertations Summer 8-31-2013 A framework for guiding transportation improvements to support desired land use Jiruttichut Leoviriyakit New Jersey Institute of Technology Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/dissertations Part of the Transportation Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Leoviriyakit, Jiruttichut, "A framework for guiding transportation improvements to support desired land use" (2013). Dissertations. 386. https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/dissertations/386 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at Digital Commons @ NJIT. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ NJIT. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright Warning & Restrictions The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a, user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use” that user may be liable for copyright infringement, This institution
    [Show full text]
  • MONMOUTH Municipallity: County Code: Agency Code
    HPO Cultural Resource Reports FILTER SETTINGS: (Sorted by: County / Municipality / Shelf Code) County:: MONMOUTH Municipallity: County Code: Agency Code: MONMOUTH MONMOUTH Countywide Countywide MON A 70a 1986 ID6990 MON GB 133 1976 ID7824 Final Report for Atlantic Coast of New Jersey, Sea Bright to Ocean Index of "Century Homes" for Monmouth County's Bicentennial Project Township, Monmouth County, Remote Sensing of Proposed Offshore County of Monmouth Sand Borrow Areas Report Type: Architecture Reconnaissance Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey, Inc. Location: SHELVED: GB Report Type: Archaeology Phase I Location: SHELVED: CRM MON GB 135 v1 1990 ID7826 Monmouth County Historic Sites Inventory [Volume 1: Summary Report, ID11646 MON A 370 2015 1990 Updates] Ten Target Investigations Between Elberon (City of Long Branch) and Monmouth County Park System Village of Loch Arbour and Near Shore Remote Sensing Survey from Architecture Intensive Sea Bright to Elberon (City of Long Branch) in Connection with the Report Type: Atlantic Coast of New Jersey Sandy Hook to Barnegat… Location: SHELVED: GB Panamerican Consultants, Inc. 1999 ID2280 Report Type: Archaeology Phase I MULT A 147 Final Draft A Geomorphological and Archaeological Analysis fof Location: SHELVED: CRM Potential Dredeged Material Management Alternative Sites in the New York Harbor-Apex Region 1984 ID7069 MON E 176 LaPorta & Associates, Inc. Warwick, NY Stage IA Level Archaeological Survey of Monmouth County, NJ Report Type: Geomorphological Report R. Alan Mounier Location: SHELVED: CRM Report Type: Archaeology Phase I Location: STORED (Box P782) MULT A 147a 1986 ID4946 A Preliminary Assessment of Cultural Resources Sensitivity for the MON E 302 1984 ID13828 Lower New York Bay, New York and New Jersey Stage IA Level Archaeological Survey, 201 Facilities Plan for Septic U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey's Cultural Resources: A.D. 1660-1810
    NEW JERSEY'S CULTURAL RESOURCES: A.D. 1660-1810 by Peter O. Wacker Introduction Of all the original thirteen colonies, New Jersey's historical resources are perhaps the most varied. A major reason for this is that New Jersey was, without question, the most culturally diverse of the European North American colonies. Such divers ity continued into the national period and, with continued in-migration, even to the present day. By the time of the first national census (1790), New Jersey possessed a distinct set of cultural regions. These were a function of her settlement history and lasted (at least in terms of characteristic features on the landscape) well into the nine­ teenth century. An additional set of factors promoting diversity is and was present in the state's physical milieu. Physiography, soils, drainage, vegetation, mine~al resources and, to a certain extent, climate, vary remarkably for such a relatively small area. These. physical factors provided quite a different set of economic oppor­ tunities from place to place and through time, depending on rela­ tions with the outside world - especially Western Europe, New England, and the Caribbean in the early years.. Changes in tech­ nology also affected the ways in which resources were perceived and utilized. The first permanent settlement by Europeans in what later became New Jersey was by the Dutch at Bergen (Jersey City) in 1660. Old Bergen County (present Bergen, Passaic, and Hudson) continued to attract the Dutch and those associated with them (Flemings, Huguenots, Germans, Scandinavians, etc. ) . In 1664, when Dutch colonial rule ended and was superseded by the English, New Englanders began to move into the areas south of Bergen, especially present Essex, Union, Middlesex, and Monmouth Counties.
    [Show full text]
  • July 9, 2013 Mr. Judson Cross Department of the Treasury Division
    July 9, 2013 Mr. Judson Cross Department of the Treasury Division of Purchase and Property 9th Floor, 33 West State Street Trenton, NJ 08625 RE: Best and Final Offer Environmental Assessment Field Contractors for Environmental and Historic Preservation Reviews - New Jersey’s CDBG-DR Grant Program RFQ787923S Dear Mr. Cross: Per your request for a best and final offer (BAFO) in accordance with Section 6.8 of the above referenenced RFQ, Gannett Fleming is pleased to provide our response. The attached BAFO Price Schedule for EAF Contractors provides our updated firm-fixed pricing and loaded hourly rate pricing for our team. In response to the state’s request for aggressive price reductions, we have lowered our per unit prices for exempt and categorically excluded subject to 58.5 program reviews. There are no changes to our commitments or other requirements as provided in our June 27, 2013 RFQ response submittal. Please contact me if you have questions on our pricing or abilities to perform the services required. We appreciate your consideration of our Team for this important assignment. Sincerely, GANNETT FLEMING, INC. Michael A. Morgan, P.E., P.P., P.T.O.E. Vice President Southfield Center • Suite 205 • One Cragwood Road • South Plainfield, NJ 07080-2448 t: 908.755.0040 • f: 908.755.9849 www.gannettfleming.com Gannett Fleming, Inc. RFQ 787923S July 9, 2013 BAFO Cost Quote Price Schedule 3 EAF Contractor –Firm Fixed Pricing Pricing for services required under this RFQ will be a blend of firm fixed rates and hourly rates. Bidders must complete all price cells within the Price Schedule or be deemed non-responsive.
    [Show full text]
  • LANDING BRIDGE HAER No. NJ-74 Spanning the Raritan River at Landing Lane New Brunswick Middlesex County New Jersey
    LANDING BRIDGE HAER No. NJ-74 Spanning the Raritan River at Landing Lane New Brunswick Middlesex County New Jersey PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service Northeast Region U.S. Custom House 200 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD LANDING BRIDGE HAER NO. NJ- 74 LOCATION: Landing Lane over Raritan River, between New Brunswick and Piscataway Township, Middlesex County, New Jersey USGS Plainfield, NJ Quadrangle, Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: 18.545380.4484130 DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: 1895 PRESENT OWNER: County of Middlesex, New Brunswick, New Jersey PRESENT USE: Vehicular and pedestrian bridge. To be replaced 1991 SIGNIFICANCE: Landing Bridge is a representative example of late 19th century bridge design and construction, featuring Pratt trusses and riveted connections. The bridge was designed by George F. Blakely, who was at the time chief engineer for the Passaic Rolling Mill Co. of Paterson, New Jersey. It was built by the Penn Bridge Company of Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania. Portions of the stone abutments of the earlier bridge at this location were re-used in construction of Landing Bridge. PROJECT INFORMATION: Landing Bridge was recorded in January­ February 1991 by the Cultural Resource Group of Louis Berger & Associates, Inc., East Orange, New Jersey, for Buchart­ Horn, Inc., Marl ton, New Jersey. The recordation was undertaken pursuant to a Memorandum of Agreement among the Office of New Jersey Heritage, United States Coast Guard, County of Middlesex, and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. Project personnel included Martha H. Bowers, Architectural Historian; Alison Helms, Historian; and Rob Tucher, Photographer. LANDING BRIDGE HAER NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Procedures for Evaluating Planned Development During the Noise Study Process
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1240 7 Procedures For Evaluating Planned Development During The Noise Study Process JEFFREY FORCE AND STEVEN H. HOCHMAN The Federal Highway Administration's Procedures for Abatement This paper provides a detailed discussion of the need for of Highway Traffic Noise and Construction Noise requires that the New Jersey to implement the policy statement in FHPM New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) Bureau of 7-7-3 regarding impacts on undeveloped lands for which devel­ Environmental Analysis (BEA) analyze expected noise impacts and opments are "planned, designed and programmed." Also dis­ abatement measures for undeveloped lands for which development cussed are the procedures set forth to evaluate undeveloped is planned, designed, and programmed. To satisfy federal require­ lands adjacent to proposed roadway improvements on which ments to evaluate undeveloped land on which development is development is planned. Finally, the effectiveness and limi­ planned, while also minimizing disruptions in the roadway design process, a procedure was initiated to maintain thorough, early, tations associated with the procedures will be examined. and periodic coordination with affected municipalities during the noise study process. This procedure includes the identification of proposed residential developments during the preparation of the IMPLEMENTATION OF PROCEDURES TO Final Noise Study (FNS) and before completion of roadway con­ EVALU ATE UNDEVELOPED LAND DURING struction. Generally, early detection of proposed residential devel­ THE NOISE STUDY PROCESS opments eliminates problems for NJDOT-Design Units and the NJDOT-BEA Noise Group caused by the recommendation of bar­ riers for previously unknown housing developments after approval The procedures to evaluate undeveloped land during the noise of the FNS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Westfield Leader D
    o ct- o < w < <-• o o JO:J n UJ O •"< •-< UJ U. _J t- pq in (/l 3 M UJ THE WESTFIELD LEADER D. <f 3 The Leading and Most Widely Circulated Weekly Newspaper In Union County UHPS CJIHI2IJ NINETY-FIRST YEAR, NO. 17 fipennd ClaHa Postage Paid Published 24 Pajjcs-2O Cans Hi WejuflrM. N J WESTFIELD, NEW JERSEY, WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 1980 very Thursday For Westfielders: Touchdowns before Turkey Per-Student Costs Here By Greg Loder TheWestfield High School Individually on offense the Don Knobloch's record of football team will bring the scoring has been led by 1969 of five field goals. Lower Than Comparable 1980 season to a close after senior Michael Henry who Although in many games tomorrow's Turkey Day has scored nine touchdowas Westfield has not needed to Classic at Plainfield at 11 for 54 points. Henry also throw the ball Lasher who o'clock. leads the team in rushing still has thrown 23 com- Schools, Greene Says with 485 yards on only 80 pletions on 66 attempts for The rivalry between the carries. Blue Devils and the Car- 285 yards. Striking a blow for a high level of excellence al Dr. (; wine's 1U81-82 dinals of Plainfield has been Behind Henry in the Receiving Lasher's education, Westfield School relatively modest costs." budget message includes going on ever since 20 year scoring category is senior passes this season has been Superintendent Laurence F. Delivering Ihe budget the following educational mentor of Westfield, Coach quarterback, kicker and Dan Brady with four Greene's 1981-82 school message to Ihe Board of highlights.
    [Show full text]
  • MIDDLESEX Municipallity: County Code: Agency Code
    HPO Cultural Resource Reports FILTER SETTINGS: (Sorted by: County / Municipality / Shelf Code) County:: MIDDLESEX Municipallity: County Code: Agency Code: MIDDLESEX MIDDLESEX Countywide Countywide MID F 451 1993 ID11462 MID R 42a v3 1992 ID11324 Route US 1 (5E, 6S) Middlesex County, New Jersey Wetlands Mitigation "Proposed 30" Liberty Pipeline from Morgan, New Jersey Across Raritan Site Archaeological Study Bay, Lower New York Bay and the Atlantic Ocean to Edgemere, New NJ DOT, Bureau of Environmental Analysis York. Volume 3 of 3. Hazard and Archaeological Survey Phase 2―Liberty Pipeline Offshore New Jersey and New York Report Type: Other Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey, Inc. Location: SHELVED: CRM Report Type: Archaeology Phase II MID R 35b 1989 ID11051 Location: SHELVED: CRM A Cultural Resources Survey of the Proposed Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation Main Natural Gas Pipeline Expansion, MP1794.99- MID R 42b 1992 ID11325 MP1802.73, Middlesex County, NJ. Report of Archaeological Phase III Hazard and Archaeological Survey, Proposed Liberty Pipeline Investigation No. 2. in Raritan Bay New Jersey and New York EMANCO, Inc. Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey, Inc. Report Type: Archaeology Phase I Report Type: Archaeology Phase III Location: SHELVED: CRM Location: SHELVED: CRM MID R 35c 1989 ID11052 MID GB 125 v1 1979 ID7815 A Cultural Resources Survey of the Proposed Transcontinental Gas Pipe Middlesex County Inventory of Historic, Cultural, and Architectural Line Corporation Main Natural Gas Pipeline Expansion, MP1790.84- Resources: Summary Report MP1794.70, Middlesex County, NJ. Report of Archaeological Heritage Studies, Inc. Investigation No. 1. Report Type: Architecture Intensive EMANCO, Inc. Location: SHELVED: GB Report Type: Archaeology Phase I Location: SHELVED: CRM MID GB 126 1985 ID7817 Middlesex County Cultural and Heritage Commission Final Report: MID R 42 1992 ID11321 Middlesex County Historic Preservation Grant Summary 1985 "Proposed 30" Pipeline from an Underwater Tap Valve in Raritan Bay to Janet W.
    [Show full text]
  • Naterfront District Plan East Brunswick, Nj
    \Naterfront district plan east bruns\Nick 1 n.j. ERRATA Page No. 18 "IX" Historical Anaysis" should be spelled "Analysis" 23 "B. Marina Morrings" should be spelled "Moorings" .51 "pirnidng11 should be spelled "picnicking" 69 Under "VII Environmental Permits, Permit Name, Tidelands (Riparian) Grant, Lease or License", is not considered a permit. \Naterfront district plan east bruns\Nick 1 n.j. preface This document was prepared to analyze East Brunswick's waterfront district, an area identified by the State of New Jersey as a part of the state's coastal management zone. The report is divided into three sections: Part 1, Analysis, Part 2, Alternatives and Part 3, Plans. part 1 analysis 1981 Page I. Delineation of Study Area 2 II. Land Use and Zoning 6 III. Land Ownership 8 IV. Topography 8 v. Hydrology 12 VI. Vegetation 14 VII. Surface Geology 16 VIII. Soils 18 IX. Historical Analysis 18 X. Special Areas 23 Notes and Sources 28 WATERFRONT DISTRICT PLAN ./ TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BRUNSWIC KEY MAP I I 0 I 000 2 000 4000 I"= 2 J ooo' I. Delineation of Study Area The study area is located in the Township of East Brunswick, Middlesex County, New Jersey (longitude 74°23' - latitude 40°28'). This area composes the extreme northeast portion of the municipality and is bound by: 1. The Lawrence Brook and the City of New Brunswick to the northwest; 2. The Raritan River and Edison Township to the northeast; 3. The South River and the Borough of Sayreville to the east; 4. The Borough of South River to the south; and 5.
    [Show full text]
  • HPO Cultural Resource Reports FILTER SETTINGS: (Sorted By: County / Municipality / Shelf Code) County:: SOMERSET Municipallity: County Code: Agency Code
    HPO Cultural Resource Reports FILTER SETTINGS: (Sorted by: County / Municipality / Shelf Code) County:: SOMERSET Municipallity: County Code: Agency Code: SOMERSET SOMERSET Countywide Countywide SOM F 572 2009 ID11423 MULT C 915b 2012 ID10232 Millstone Valley Scenic Byway, Corridor Management Plan Intensive-Level Architectural Survey, North Central Reliability Project, Stantec; Lardner/Klein Landscape Architects, PC; Oldham Historic PSE&G Services Corporation; Essex, Morris, Somerset, Union, and Middlesex Counties, NJ Report Type: Preservation/Management Plan Richard Grubb & Associates, Inc. Location: SHELVED: CRM Report Type: Architecture Intensive SOM GB 26 v1 1989 ID5854 Location: SHELVED: CRM Somerset County Survey [Volume 1: Summary Report] MULT C 915c 2012 ID10356 Research & Archeological Management, Inc. (RAM) Supplemental Phase IB Archaeological Survey and Archaeological Report Type: Combined Report Monitoring, Public Service Electric and Gas Company, North Central Location: SHELVED: GB Reliability Project, Essex, Morris, Somerset, Union, and Middlesex Counties, New Jersey SOM GB 26 v2 1989 ID10739 Richard Grubb & Associates, Inc. Somerset County Survey [Volume 2: Street Index, Phase I Report (April Report Type: Combined Report 1989), Phase II Report (August 1989)] Location: SHELVED: CRM Research & Archeological Management, Inc. (RAM) Report Type: Combined Report MULT C 1380 2020 ID14169 Location: SHELVED: GB Phase IA Cultural Resource Reconnaissance: Roseland to Pleasant Valley Circuit Rebuild, Branchburg to Plesant Valley Segment,
    [Show full text]
  • Stolen Car-100M.P.H.-Chase-Crash
    ~ \ c Old Bridge-Madison Park-Sayre Woods South-Cliffwood Beach-Cheesequake-Browntown-Central Park MADISON AMERICAN VOL. 28, No. 14 THURSDAY, JULY 18, 1963 LAURENCE HARBOR.N.J. (Contain* le»* than 75% advertising) PRICE FIVE CENTS Parkins Ordinance, Salary Ordinance Amendment Introduce Swim Pool Ordinance Also Heard In Meeting That Lasted 25 Minutes The Township Committee in Mayor John Keating. In the past more than 18 inches and Also introduced by the com -, ditch located in Ciiffwood Beach. what may have been a record few months meetings have lasted a capacity exceeding 750 gal­ mittee was ordinances dealing The ditch in question is behind breaking regular meeting intro­ for several hours. lons. The ordinance calls for with the operation of trucks of Ocean Blvd., and was for the duced several ordinances for ap­ Introduced by the committee the construction of fences of over 4 tons in weight on Texas purpose of drainage of water, proval. The Monday evening on first reading and ordered specified height and equipped with Road. An amendment to the since the installation of the ditch, regular meeting lasted for only advertised was an ordinance to locks and gates and must be of Township Parking ordinance was storms sewers have been in­ 25 minutes. The meeting was control private swimming and mesh typeconstruction so not to also introduced as well as an stalled in the area. A group called to order at 7:30 ,p.m. by wading pools having a depth of impair vision. amendmentof a ordinance for the of residents in the area petitioned various salaries of municipal the committee to clean the ditch.
    [Show full text]