DOCSLIB.ORG

Official Statements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Official Statements 2017 Official Statements ISDR-ASIA PARTNERSHIP FORUM 14-15 DECEMBER 2017, BANGKOK, THAILAND IAP statements, 14-15 December 2017 Member States 1. Afghanistan 2. Australia 3. Bangladesh 4. Bhutan 5. Cambodia 6. India 7. Japan 8. Malaysia 9. Maldives 10. Mongolia 11. Myanmar 12. Nepal 13. Pakistan 14. Sri Lanka 15. Thailand 16. Vietnam UN and International Organisations 1. UNESCAP 2. FAO 3. JICA 4. RCM-TWG 5. UN WOMEN 6. UNDP 7. UNESCO 8. UNFPA 9. UN-HABITAT 10. UNICEF 11. UNOOSA 12. WHO 1 Stakeholder Groups 1. CSO, ADRRN 2. ARISE 3. Children and Youth 4. Duryog Nivaran 5. Huairou Commission 6. IFRC 7. Science and Technology group Intergovernmental and Regional Organisations 1. ADPC 2. ADRC 3. ASEAN 4. ECO 5. IUCN 2 Official Statements of Member States 3 Afghanistan ******** Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, As we all know, Afghanistan is at the top of Global Risk Index. Being the signatory of the Sendai Framework, the Government of Islamic Republic of Afghanistan is committed to work towards achieving the goals and targets of Asia Regional Plan for Disaster Risk Reduction. As a first step in the direction, we are presently developing the comprehensive National Strategy backed up by a Capacity Needs Assessment study. For enhancing awareness about the Sendai process, we have taken up a series sensitization programs at the national level in collaboration with local partners. The Sendai Framework document has been translated in local ‘Dari’ language for wider dissemination. A total of 3 National Consultation workshops have been organized involving Government line Ministries/Departments, NGOs, Civil Society Organisations, UN Agencies, academia, corporate bodies, local civic bodies and media. Provincial ANDMAs have also been conducting Sendai Awareness campaigns at the local level. The preparatory work for setting up the multi-stakeholder and multi-sector National Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction (NPDRR) has already been initiated. Ladies and Gentlemen, Afghanistan has steadily improving the availability and accessibility of hazard information, including mapping of hazard, resource and operational areas of different humanitarian agencies. We are working with UN and other technology driven organisations towards improving the Early Warning Systems in the country. Urban Risk Reduction is one of the major focus of the Government. A UN - HABITAT ‘City Resilience Project’ is currently under implementation in Kabul and Mazar-i-Sharif. Enhancing urban communities’ resilience to disaster and climate risks and strengthening national capacities for risk-sensitive urban development are the expected outcomes of the project. Lack of Centralized disaster damage and loss data base, limited capacity in loss modelling, interpretation of hazard information to estimate the potential risks and capacity gaps in integrating disaster risk reduction into development plans are some of the critical challenges for us. Additionally, IDP’s and returnees resettlement and security are the major challenge for our Government. 4 In 2017 we worked with our partners and communities to understand the Sendai process and prepare the National Action Plan for implementation of Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction in the country. Setting up the Damage Loss Data Base is one of the challenging tasks. We look forward to critical support from UNISDR in this regard. Ladies and Gentlemen, despite all the odds, our Government is seriously committed to work with the UNISDR, regional and international partners, keeping community in the forefront, towards the Sendai objectives and Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) goals and targets for Afghanistan and Asia Regional Plan at large. Thank you all for your kind attention.... ******** Back to table of content 5 Australia ******** On behalf of the Australian Government, I would like to thank the Governments of Thailand and Mongolia for co-hosting this valuable meeting. I also thank the UNISDR for their work in preparation for co-hosting this event. This meeting provides a valuable opportunity to share experiences and build stronger partnerships in the lead up to next year’s Asian Ministerial Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction (AMCDRR) to be held in Mongolia in July. The Australian Government remains firmly committed to implementing the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and the Asia Regional Plan for Implementation of the Sendai Framework. We look forward to exploring ideas and actions we can take to support our partners at this week’s forum. Major achievements in 2017 Since the adoption of the Sendai Framework, Australia has continued to focus on ensuring we have the right policies and governance arrangements in place to improve disaster risk management. We are also building a stronger understanding of Australia’s preparedness to report against the Sendai Framework. In 2017, the Australian Government formed a Sendai Framework Working Group with representatives from each Australian state and territory. The Working Group will consider what is feasible for implementation of the Sendai Framework in the Australian context, including in regards to reporting. Australia is now undertaking a data collection trial that will inform Australia’s approach to Sendai Framework reporting. We are also currently developing a national strategy for the implementation of and reporting against the Sendai Framework. Australia is looking for opportunities to more effectively integrate disaster risk reduction across a range of policy responsibilities. While there is a lot of work to do to mainstream disaster risk reduction, in 2017 we have seen success at the national level. This has led to major national government policy initiatives outside the emergency management space reflecting the importance of disaster risk reduction. One example of how we have achieved this is through the Australian Government Disaster and Climate Resilience Reference Group. The Reference Group is identifying ways to integrate risk and resilience considerations into planning, policies and programs. The Reference Group is a forum to build relationships, share knowledge and lessons learnt and coordinate implementation of domestic and international policies. These activities will result in increased collaboration to assist 6 Australian Government agencies to embed disaster risk thinking in policy, programmes and for assets. Throughout 2017, the Australian Government also continued to engage with the private sector, which contributes significantly to the policy debate through research on disaster resilience and innovative approaches to mitigation. Key contextual issues A key contextual issue for Australia is its federated structure. In Australia, states and territories have the primary responsibility for emergency management, and the national Government provides oversight and leadership. This structure poses complexities and challenges but also presents opportunities to collaborate and promote the concept of shared responsibility. This is evident in the collection of data required for Sendai indicator reporting. Data on most of the indicators is currently collected and stored at a state and territory level. Australia has been working closely with its jurisdictions to consider the most pragmatic and effective way to report on Sendai Framework implementation. This work is ongoing and will be a national priority for 2018. Activities contributing to disaster risk reduction in the region Australia recognises that climate change and natural disasters will have an increasing impact on our region’s stability, security and prosperity, and is committed to global action on disaster risk reduction. Our aid investments have a focus on helping to build resilience to disasters. In the 2016-17 financial year, the Australian Government’s total disaster risk reduction expenditure for a range of initiatives across the Indo-Pacific region and beyond is estimated at A$120.3 million. To implement our assistance in the region, we draw on our partnerships with UNISDR and the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery. We also draw on Australia’s technical expertise and experience to support our neighbours to develop and implement their disaster risk reduction strategies. For example, Australia has helped the Government of the Philippines to develop guidelines for designing and constructing infrastructure to standards that are appropriate for the types of disasters experienced in the Philippines. Australia’s contribution to the Nepal Safe Schools Program enabled the retrofitting of 169 schools to improve earthquake resilience. All of these survived the 2015 7 earthquakes and provided much needed safe shelter and community spaces and facilitated the rapid return to normal education services. Conclusion We look forward to working with you all over the next two days, and over the coming months, to ensure the AMCDRR in July 2018 is a resounding success. The next AMCDRR meeting will be an important opportunity for all our countries to take stock on how we are implementing the Sendai Framework ahead of meeting our reporting commitments to the UNISDR in March 2019. I appreciate the opportunity to present Australia’s perspective. We can all learn from sharing our experiences and gain much from building stronger partnerships across the region. By doing this, we will make a substantial contribution to the stability and prosperity in our region, which benefits us all. ******** Back to table of content 8 Bangladesh ******** Mr. Chair, Excellency, Distinguished Delegates, Ladies and Gentlemen
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BA Country Report of Kyrgyzstan Part 1 Macro Level
    Informal Governance and Corruption – Transcending the Principal Agent and Collective Action Paradigms Kyrgyzstan Country Report Part 1 Macro Level Aksana Ismailbekova | July 2018 Basel Institute on Governance Steinenring 60 | 4051 Basel, Switzerland | +41 61 205 55 11 [email protected] | www.baselgovernance.org BASEL INSTITUTE ON GOVERNANCE This research has been funded by the UK government's Department for International Development (DFID) and the British Academy through the British Academy/DFID Anti-Corruption Evidence Programme. However, the views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the British Academy or DFID. Dr Aksana Ismailbekova, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Advokatenweg 36 06114 Halle (Saale), Germany, [email protected] 1 BASEL INSTITUTE ON GOVERNANCE Table of contents Abstract 3 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Informal Governance and Corruption: Rationale and project background 4 1.2 Informal governance in Kyrgyzstan 4 1.3 Conceptual approach 6 1.4 Research design and methods 6 2 Informal governance and the lineage associations: 1991–2005 7 2.1 Askar Akaev and the transition to Post-Soviet governance regime 7 2.2 Co-optation: Political family networks 8 2.3 Control: social sanctions, demonstrative punishment and selective law enforcement 11 2.4 Camouflage: the illusion of inclusive democracy and charitable contributions 13 2.5 The Tulip Revolution and the collapse of the Akaev networks 13 3 Epoch of Bakiev from 2005–2010 14 3.1 Network re-accommodation in the aftermath of the Tulip Revolution
    [Show full text]
  • The Main Dilemmas of the President
    Anniversary of Jeenbekov’s Reign: The Main Dilemmas of the President «Sooronbay Jeenbekov had time to take a close look at the ups and downs of more than one ruler. Having come to power, he cannot but be aware that power is both honor and burden. To adequately stay in it, it is necessary to go through more than one cay of dilemmas. The first year of the presidency has already presented several challenges. Some have been passed, the most are still to come» – expert Elmira Nogoibaeva noted in her article written specifically for CABAR.asia. Русский Кыргызча Summary of the article: Sooronbay Jeenbekov managed to avoid the expected patronage of the former boss; Jeenbekov’s foreign policy can now be called the format of a crisis manager; The style of the Jeenbekov family and some of his statements demonstrate high religiosity; President Jeenbekov does not have a well-coordinated, dedicated and initiative team yet. Anniversary of Jeenbekov’s Reign: The Main Dilemmas of the President The fortune brought Jeenbekov to the political olympus. Photo: president.kg The story does not reveal, whether a shy young man from a remote from the center Karakuldzha village, located between Fergana and Alay mountain ranges, ever dreamed of becoming a president. However, it is known for sure that he became on November 15, 2017 at the national elections of the Kyrgyz Republic, having gained 54.76% of votes. It is quite difficult to say that Sooronbay Jeenbekov long and inquisitively walked towards this highest political hypostasis. Yes, his path was not easy, but how much the presidency itself was the goal? The goals of various politicians of the independence period, aspiring to the olympus, vary widely.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Sensitive
    Note: These concept notes are as received from partner organizations Asian Ministerial Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction 2016 New Delhi, India 02-05 November 2016 Concept Note for Thematic session Event title Using experience from the region in ensuring that implementing of the Sendai Framework is gender inclusive Event code THEM-19 Date and Time Friday, 4th November, 13.00-14.30 Venue/ Room no. Annexe B, Ground Floor, Vigyan Bhawan Organizers Lead: Duryog Nivaran/Stakeholder Group on Individuals and Organization concerned with Gender Issues Collaborators: JICA, UNWomen, IFRC, Christian Aid, UNISDR Contact Details* (lead): Name: Mihir Bhatt/Ramona Miranda Designation: Chair/Steering Committee member Email id and phone number: [email protected] Organization name and address: Duryog Nivaran, 5 Lionel Edirisinghe Mawatha, Colombo 5, Sri Lanka. Session To unpack and translate the concept of gender inclusion and women’s Objectives leadership role in DRR promoted in the Sendai Framework for DRR to actions/recommendations in the institutional and social context of Asia To share multi-country/multi actor experiences of women’s leadership role in disaster risk reduction To discuss priority steps and commitments for ensuring gender sensitivity in the Asia Plan for implementing the Sendai Framework for implementing gender sensitive Sendai Framework to be endorsed at the AMCDRR Background and Our society has diverse social, economic and power dynamics where actors like context men, women, children, youth, elderly, disabled and minorities do not have an equal or equitable role or chance to participate, bargain and negotiation. This has been clearly recognised in the post 2015 global guidance frameworks including the Agenda 2030 SDG s and Sendai Framework for DRR.
    [Show full text]
  • Mistakes and Lessons of the "Fifth" Power Transfer in Kyrgyzstan
    Mistakes and lessons of the "fifth" power transfer in Kyrgyzstan “If Atambayev weighs the whole course of events leading to an extremely unprofitable situation for him, he can identify for himself a few of his mistakes. For Jeenbekov, these errors by Atambayev can be relevant lessons at an early stage of his presidential term” – notes Emil Juraev, writing specially for CABAR.asia. Русский Кыргызча The fifth change of power Four others preceded the process of presidential transition from Almazbek Atambayev to Sooronbay Jeenbekov, and each case left important lessons – some were learned, some were half-forgotten. This fifth transition should be considered in a comparative manner with the previous ones; that is, as a regular process, the course traced its predecessors in many respects. The first case was in 1990-1991, when the last Soviet leader of Kyrgyzstan, Absamat Masaliev, resigned, in a rather peculiar combination of circumstances no less, to Askar Akayev, first in parliament and then via popular vote. The second example was in 2005, when Askar Akayev was overthrown in the “Tulip Revolution”, and the government passed under rather ambiguous events to Kurmanbek Bakiyev. The third instance of power transfer was in April 2010. Much like the second iteration, which was also extraordinary, an entire group of people temporarily replaced Bakiyev, who subsequently fled to Belarus. The newly- formed Provisional Government came under the chairmanship of Rosa Otunbayeva. Otunbayeva, later approved as president through a limited-term referendum, handed over power at the end of 2011. Elected in a national vote, the reigns of power were handed over to Almazbek Atambayev, marking a first for Kyrgyzstan and making the fourth case exceptionally unusual for the country.
    [Show full text]
  • WDR2004-Pages 1 to 9 16.8.2004 10:43 Page 1 WDR2004-Pages 1 to 9 16.8.2004 10:43 Page 2
    The World Disasters Report provides humanitarian “ decision-makers with a unique combination of compelling analysis and original insights from the field. Its intellectual power has enriched UN debates. Jan Egeland, United Nations’ Under-Secretary-General” for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator World Disasters Report 2004 World World Disasters Report 2004 focuses on community resilience In the hours after sudden disaster strikes, most lives are saved by the courage and resourcefulness of friends and neighbours. During slow-onset crises such as drought, some rural societies have developed extraordinary capacities to cope and bounce back. How can aid organisations strengthen rather than undermine this local resilience? Perceptions of disaster differ between those at risk and those trying to help. Evidence suggests that everyday threats to livelihoods are a greater concern to most poor communities than ‘one-off’ disasters. Meanwhile, local consensus and cooperation are as important in protecting communities as concrete walls. The report argues that a more developmental approach to creating disaster resilience is needed, which puts communities in charge of defining their needs and crafting the right solutions. The World Disasters Report 2004 features: ■ From risk to resilience – helping communities cope with crisis The International Federation of ■ Heatwaves: the developed world’s hidden disaster Red Cross and Red Crescent ■ Harnessing local capacities in rural India Societies promotes the humanitarian activities of ■ Bam sends warning to reduce future earthquake risks National Societies among ■ Building community resilience to disaster in the Philippines vulnerable people. ■ AIDS: Africa’s axis of evil By coordinating international ■ disaster relief and encouraging Surviving in the slums development support it seeks ■ Disaster data: key trends and statistics to prevent and alleviate human suffering.
    [Show full text]
  • (ICH) and NATURAL DISASTER in BANGLADESH: EXISTING POLICIES and STRATEGIES for SAFEGUARDING Md
    INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE (ICH) AND NATURAL DISASTER IN BANGLADESH: EXISTING POLICIES AND STRATEGIES FOR SAFEGUARDING Md. Amanullah Bin Mahmood1 Introduc� on Bangladesh is a country with rich cultural diversity. It has a great deal of Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH), which contributes to strengthening social beliefs, building resilience and recreati on as well as economic development. Of the ICH of Bangladesh, four elements have already been added to UNESCO’s Lists. Bangladesh, however, is one of the world’s most vulnerable countries in terms of the adverse eff ects of disaster and climate change. Among other disasters, Bangladesh is the country most vulnerable to tropical cyclones and the sixth most vulnerable to fl ooding (BCCSAP 2009). Its unique geographical locati on makes the country more vulnerable to diff erent natural disasters and climate change. The country has a rich variety of ICH, but a number of ICH properti es are under threat due to the effects of disaster and climate change. Presently, Bangladesh is implementi ng two important related conventi ons, the Conventi on for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (2003) and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reducti on 2015–2030. Moreover, a newly prepared disaster-related plan, the Nati onal Plan for Disaster Management 2016–2020, is also at the implementati on stage. Although disaster management is one of the most pressing issues in the country, few drawbacks exist at the policy level for safeguarding ICH against disaster and climate risk. Where the issues of safeguarding ICH from the eff ects of disaster and climate change are addressed, this is done so indiscriminately and indirectly in diff erent related policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Research Service
    INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND WORLD BANK GROUP 2018 ANNUAL MEETINGS CIVIL SOCIETY POLICY FORUM ARE WE BUILDING BACK BETTER? LESSONS FROM SOUTH ASIA DISASTER REPORT (2016) Surabaya, Bali, Indonesia Wednesday, October 10, 2018 3:30 p.m. LIST OF PARTICIPANTS MIHIR R. BHATT Director All India Disaster Mitigation Institute & Chairperson, Duryog Nivaran SUNITA KAYASTHA Emergency Specialist, UNICEF – Nepal DENIS NKALA Regional Coordinator – Asia Pacific United Nations Office for South-South Cooperation) * * * * * Are We Building Back Better? Lessons from South Asia Disaster Report (2016) (3:30 a.m.) MR. BHATT: This particular panel has been especially put together to look at this whole idea of build back better and, you know, who does it, how it is done, who matters, why it is far more important now than it has been before, so on and so forth. And keeping that in mind, we have drawn from a very important report that came out last year, which was called Build Back Better, and it reviewed what has happened in South Asia in the last 10 years and all the disasters that took place that attracted international financing or international relief. And from that study which was done by various countries in South Asia and the report itself was done by Duryog Nivaran, which is alternative network of individuals and institutions which look at disasters differently and exactly the point being that when there is talk about disasters and finance, there are World Bank President and Indonesia Finance Minister and two other ministers actually gather up and when
    [Show full text]
  • 3.3. Community Action
    Policy and public commitment: the foundation of disaster risk reduction 3 3.3. Community action “Much has been learnt Risk reduction measures are most successful when they involve from the creative disaster the direct participation of the people most likely to be exposed to prevention efforts of poor hazards, in the planning, decision-making, and operational activi- communities in developing ties at all levels of responsibility. Local leaders, drawn from politi- countries. Prevention policy cal, social and economic sectors of society need to assume a pri- is too important to be left to mary responsibility for the protection of their own community. governments and interna- tional agencies alone. To Community processes and actions to accomplish disaster risk reduction is much talked about, in theory, but it is much more succeed, it must also engage difficult to realize in practice. There is however experience to sug- civil society, the private sec- gest that the involvement of local residents in protecting their own tor and the media.” resources is possible and can work – if sufficient attention and investment is devoted to the subject. The salient issues and exam- Kofi Annan, IDNDR ples which illustrate successful practice are presented under the Programme Forum, following headings: Geneva, July 1999 • The essential role of community action • Community leadership and relationships • Increasing community capabilities • NGO and volunteer activities • Building local self-reliance: sharing resources, building part- nerships • Dynamics of local collaboration • Traditional community coping mechanisms at stake The essential role of community action Community Disaster reduction is most effective at the com- The definition of community in this context refers to a munity level where specific local needs can be social group, which has a number of things in common, met.
    [Show full text]
  • Abbreviations
    Abbreviations AA Auswärtiges Amt [Federal Ministry for AP II Protocol Additional to the Geneva Foreign Affairs, Germany] Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating AC alternate current to the Protection of Victims of Non- AC Arctic Council International Armed Conflicts ACF Australian Conservation Foundation APA ASEAN People’s Assembly ACHAP African Comprehensive HIV/AIDS APEC Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Programme APFA Accés à la Propriété Fonciére Agricole ACIA Arctic Climate Impact Assessment [Access to Agricultural Land] ACP Africa – Caribbean – Pacific API American Petroleum Institute ACS Association of Caribbean States APN Asia Pacific Network for Global Change ACTS African Centre for Technology Studies Research AD anno domini [after Christ] APPRA Asian-Pacific Peace Research Association ADB Asian Development Bank APR Asia-Pacific Roundtable ADHR Arctic Human Development Report APROFEM Association pour la Promotion de la Femme ADL Amu Darya Lowlands et de l’Enfant au Mali [Association for the Promotion of Women and Children in ADM Archer Daniels Midland Mali] AEW aerial early warning APWLD Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and AFD Agence Française de Développement Development AfDB African Development Bank AR4 Fourth Assessment Report (of IPCC in AFES-PRESS Peace Research and European Security 2007) Studies (international scientific NGO) ARF ASEAN Regional Forum AFREGS Armed Forces Regression Study ARIJ Applied Research Institute of Jerusalem AGOA Africa Growth and Opportunity Act ARW Advanced Research Workshops AI Amnesty International
    [Show full text]
  • Local Leadership for Disaster Resilience
    Local Leadership for Disaster Resilience Profiles from Asia and the Pacific © United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 3.O IGO (CC BY-NC 3.O IGO). No part of this publication can be used for commercial purposes without the prior permission of UNDRR. Please write to [email protected] to obtain permission. To view a copy of the license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/igo/ When content, such as an image, graphic, data, trademark, or logo, is attributed to a third party, the user is solely responsible for clearing the rights with the right holders. Coordinator: Animesh Kumar, UNDRR Authors: Manu Gupta, Vijayalakshmi Viswanathan, SEEDS-India Editorial support: Nupur Gupta, Abhishek Das, SEEDS-India Illustrations for this publication have been provided by the contributors. Citation UNDRR (2020), Local Leadership for Disaster Resilience: Profiles from Asia and the Pacific. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction – Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific Acknowledgements The publication was developed under the guidance of Loretta Hieber Girardet, Chief, UNDRR Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific and is a contribution of the Asian Disaster Risk Reduction and Response Network (ADRRN), a lead civil society network in Asia-Pacific. UNDRR and the authors deeply appreciate and acknowledge the great work being done by the community and local leaders whose case studies and life stories form the basis of this work. The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of Madelaine Alfelor-Gazmen, Philippines; Deicy Silvia Wenas, Indonesia; Tasaruru (Tatu) Whitely, Vanuatu; A.
    [Show full text]
  • Enarson.Disaster Panel
    United Nations Nations Unies COMMISSION ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN FORTY-SIXTH SESSION New York, 4 – 15 March 2002 PANEL II Environmental management and mitigation of natural disasters: a gender perspective Written statement submitted by Elaine Enarson [English only] 1 Building Disaster Resilient Communities : Learning From Community Women By Dr. Elaine Enarson Evergreen, Colorado USA Madame Chairperson, friends and colleagues: My thanks for this opportunity to share some of the conclusions of the Expert Group Meeting on environmental management and the mitigation of natural disasters. I hasten to add that all the “experts” were humbled by how much there is yet to learn and do. Our focus in Turkey and today in New York is on environmental disasters, but the task before us is even more complex. For most of the world’s people, disasters precipitated by naturally occurring environmental events are tightly interwoven with “the daily disaster” of lives constrained by poverty and inequality, and often by armed conflict and fiscal crisis as well. Technological disasters such as those that occurred at Chernobyl and Bhopal, and disasters triggered by epidemics such as HIV/AIDS also demand our attention. Let me preempt my conclusion and urge you to consider that our real task must be the prevention of disaster. I use the word prevention advisedly. Certainly, we will never escape the untimely volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and extreme weather events that are part of the human experience. But just as certainly we have a moral obligation to minimize preventable harm by changing the taken-for-granted world which transforms extreme but natural events into human tragedies.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Pressure on Human Rights in Kyrgyzstan
    Retreating Rights: Examining the pressures on human rights in Kyrgyzstan Executive Summary Kyrgyzstan has just experienced another period of rapid and chaotic change, the third time the country has overthrown an incumbent President in the last 15 years. This publication shows how the roots of the problem run deep. It explores how a culture of corruption and impunity have been at the heart of Kyrgyzstan’s institutional failings, problems that have sometimes been overlooked or downplayed because of the comparison to challenges elsewhere in Central Asia, but that were ruthlessly exposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The publication tries to explain the recent emergence of the new President Sadyr Japarov in the unrest of October 2020 and what it might mean for the future of Kyrgyzstan. An instinctive anti-elite populist with a powerful personal narrative and a past reputation for economic nationalism Japarov is undertaking a rapid consolidation of power, including through controversial constitutional reform. Liberal minded civil society has been under increasing pressure throughout the last decade. They have faced successive governments increasingly seeking to regulate and pressure them and a rising tide of nationalism that has seen hatred against civil society activists expressed on the streets and online, particularly due to the weaponisation of work on women’s and LGBTQ rights. The publication proposes a root and branch rethink of donor initiatives in Kyrgyzstan to take stock of the situation and come again with new ways to help, including the need for greater flexibility to respond to local issues, opportunities for new ideas and organisations to be supported, and a renewed focus on governance, transparency and accountability.
    [Show full text]