DOCSLIB.ORG

Moving Labor Power and Historical Forms of Migration: the Internationalist Socialist Worker, the Social Benefit Tourist and the Economic Migrant

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Moving Labor Power and Historical Forms of Migration: the Internationalist Socialist Worker, the Social Benefit Tourist and the Economic Migrant Moving Labor Power and Historical Forms of Migration: The Internationalist Socialist Worker, the Social Benefit Tourist and the Economic Migrant By Raia Apostolova Submitted to Central European University Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisors: Professor Prem Kumar Rajaram Professor Dan Rabinowitz Budapest, Hungary CEU eTD Collection 2017 Statement I hereby state that this dissertation contains no materials accepted for any other degrees in any other institutions. The thesis contains no material previously written and/or published by another person, except where appropriate acknowledgment is made in the form of bibliographical reference. Budapest, September 31, 2017 CEU eTD Collection Table of Contents INTRODUCTION FORMS OF MOVEMENT .................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER ONE THE METHODOLOGY BEHIND MOVING LABOR POWER .......................... 10 1.1. What is Moving Labor Power?.............................................................................................. 10 1.2. Methodological Liberalism: Liberal Philisophy and the Praxis of Movement ..................... 12 1.3. Approaching Movement from the Point of View of Labor Power ......................................... 22 1.4. Movement: The Potentiality and Actuality of Capitalism ..................................................... 31 1.5. Organized and Anarchic Forms of Migration ....................................................................... 34 1.6. Mapping the Thesis ............................................................................................................... 40 1.7. Method ................................................................................................................................... 44 PART ONE THE INTERNATIONALIST SOCIALIST WORKER AND THE VIETNAM- BULGARIA LABOR CONTRACTS ................................................................................................... 49 CHAPTER TWO MOVING LABOR POWER: BETWEEN EXTENSIVE AND INTENSIVE MODE OF PRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 51 2.1. Socialism and Its Mode of Production ....................................................................................... 51 2.2 Transitions Before the Transition ................................................................................................ 54 2.3. Socialism and Labor Power ....................................................................................................... 58 2.3.1. What is wrong with extensity? ............................................................................................. 60 2.4. Why Did Socialism Need Imported Labor? Socialist Presuppositions in Moving Labor Power 61 2.4.1. Moving labor power in socialism and the question of social reproduction ........................ 63 2.5. Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 66 CHAPTER THREE THE SPECIFICS OF MOVING LABOR POWER INTO SOCIALIST BULGARIA .......................................................................................................................................... 68 3.1. Vietnam Was at First Egypt: Moving Labor Power and the Risk of Exchange Rates ................ 70 3.2. The 1973 Agreement: ‘Fraternal Solidarity! Absolute Unity!’ .................................................. 74 3.3. Chasing After Debt ..................................................................................................................... 81 3.4. The 1980 Agreement and the Manufacturing of the New Vietnamese........................................ 84 CEU eTD Collection CHAPTER FOUR FROM LABOR POWER IN MOTION TO UNDESIRABLE RACE: THE CRAFTING OF PURE RACE FOR PURE MARKETS ...................................................................... 94 4.1. Socialist Vidachim, Its Everyday and Its Foreign Workers ........................................................ 96 4.2. The Trade Unions and the Foreign Workers ............................................................................ 104 4.2.1. 1980: Towards full integration? ........................................................................................ 105 4.3. Socio-Economic Context of the Transition’s First Years: Primitive Accumulation ................. 108 4.4. Legal and Economic Framework in the First Years of the Transition .................................... 112 4.5. Vidachim: From Production to Destruction ............................................................................. 114 4.6. The Crafting of Anti-Vietnamism.............................................................................................. 116 4.6.1. Primitive accumulation and race ................................................................................ 116 4.7. Anti-Vietnamism: An Epitome of Anti-Foreignism ................................................................... 125 4.8 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 127 PART TWO THE SOCIAL BENEFIT TOURIST AND FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT ................ 129 II.1. Social Movements for Freedom of Movement ......................................................................... 134 CHAPTER FIVE MOVING LABOR POWER: BETWEEN BENEFIT TOURISM AND FREE MOVEMENT ...................................................................................................................................... 141 5.1. The Structure of the “Social Benefit Tourist” .......................................................................... 141 5.2. The Articulation of the Social Benefit Tourist: “Free Movement Within Europe Needs to Be Less Free.” ...................................................................................................................................... 144 5.3. Historical Forms of Free Movement: Freedom of Movement in the Context of the European Union ............................................................................................................................................... 149 5.3.1. Free movement and the market ......................................................................................... 149 5.3.2. Is freedom of movement utopia? ........................................................................................ 155 5.3.3. The production of regular labor on hold within the framework of free movement ........... 157 5.3.4. Self-employment in the context of moving labor power .................................................... 162 5.3.5. The role of municipalities in pauperization ....................................................................... 164 5.4. Suspending Movement within the Framework of Freed Movement ......................................... 168 5.5. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 171 CHAPTER SIX POLICING FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT AND DISPERSING OF MOVING LABOR POWER ................................................................................................................................ 174 6.1. Policing Freedom of Movement ............................................................................................... 176 6.2. Organizing Those Who Move ................................................................................................... 184 6.2.1. (Re)Normalizing the norm ................................................................................................. 187 6.2.2. Mall of Shame and its Romanian Workers: “The Bulgarians told us our resistance will not last for long” ............................................................................................................................... 190 6.3. Freedom of Movement: To Escape a Habit .............................................................................. 195 CEU eTD Collection 6.4. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 201 PART THREE THE ECONOMIC MIGRANT AND THE ASYLUM SYSTEM............................ 203 CHAPTER SEVEN THE ECONOMIC MIGRANT AND HER HOST .......................................... 207 7.1. The Coming Out of the Refugee/Migrant Debate ..................................................................... 207 7.2. Historicizing the Binary ........................................................................................................... 210 7.3. The Logic Behind Violence and Its Historical Position in the Production of Political/Economic Migrants .......................................................................................................................................... 212 7.3.1. The pre-migration world and the “economy” ................................................................... 213 7.3.2. History and the Refugee .................................................................................................... 216 7.4. The Dichotomy in Migration Studies and Its Ideological Presupposition ............................... 220 7.5. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 223 CHAPTER EIGHT
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FREE to MOVE the Costs and Consequences of Restrictions on Migration
    IEA Discussion Paper No.77 FREE TO MOVE The costs and consequences of restrictions on migration Philippe Legrain November 2016 Institute of Economic Aairs With some exceptions, such as with the publication of lectures, IEA Discussion Papers are blind peer-reviewed by at least one academic or researcher who is an expert in the field. As with all IEA publications, the views expressed in IEA Discussion Papers are those of the author and not those of the Institute (which has no corporate view), its managing trustees, Academic Advisory Council or senior staff. 3 Contents About the author 04 Summary 06 Introduction 08 Problems 10 Solutions 35 Pathways 44 References 49 4 About the author 5 Philippe Legrain is a senior visiting fellow at the London School of Economics’ European Institute and the founder of Open Political Economy Network (OPEN), an international think-tank focused on international political economy and openness issues. A columnist for Project Syndicate, Foreign Policy and CapX, he commentates for a wide range of international media outlets. From 2011–14 he was economic adviser to European Commission President José Manuel Barroso and head of the team providing the president with strategic policy advice. Previously, he was special adviser to World Trade Organisation Director-General Mike Moore and trade and economics correspondent for The Economist. Philippe is the author of four critically acclaimed books, including Immigrants: Your Country Needs Them (2007), which was shortlisted for the Financial Times Business Book of the Year award. His first study for OPEN is Refugees Work: A humanitarian investment that yields economic dividends (2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Open Borders in the European Union and Beyond: Migration Flows and Labor Market Implications
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES OPEN BORDERS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND BEYOND: MIGRATION FLOWS AND LABOR MARKET IMPLICATIONS John Kennan Working Paper 23048 http://www.nber.org/papers/w23048 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 January 2017 This paper was presented at the Economic Policy Panel meeting in Florence, October 2015. I thank Sascha Becker, Ted Bergstrom, Gino Gancia, Richard Lipsey and many seminar participants for helpful comments. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2017 by John Kennan. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Open Borders in the European Union and Beyond: Migration Flows and Labor Market Implications John Kennan NBER Working Paper No. 23048 January 2017 JEL No. E25,F22,J61 ABSTRACT In 2004, the European Union admitted 10 new countries, and wages in these countries were generally well below the levels in the existing member countries. Citizens of these newly- admitted countries were subsequently free to take jobs anywhere in the EU, and many did so. In 2015, a large number of refugees from Syria and other broken countries sought to migrate to EU countries (along very dangerous routes), and these refugees were met with fierce resistance, at least in some places.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Memorandum
    For Ofz4Use Only [,HR7O-14 FOREIGN BROADCAST APPROVED FOR RElEASE - F BIS FHISTORICAL COLLE TION INFORMATION SERVICE DIVISION HR70-14 D\TE: 07-18-2012 Special Memorandum PUBLIC WARNING INDICATORS OF THE SOVIET DECISION TO INVADE CZECHOSLOVAKIA A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW ForO al Use Only 4 NOVEMBER 1980 FB 80-10045 This report is based exclusively on foreign media materials and is published by FBIS, without'coordination with other U.S. Government components. FOR OFF IAL USE ONLY FBIS SPECIAL MEMORANDUM 4 NOVEMBER 1980 PUBLIC WARNING INDICATORS OF THE SOVIET DECISION TO INVADE CZECHOSLOVAKIA A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW C 0 N T EN T S Introduction . .. 1 Chronology of 1968 Events . 4 March . 4 April ... -. 5 May - - - - - - - . 6 June . 7 July . 7 August . 9 ANNEX Key Soviet Statements on Czechoslovakia . 11 Warning Statements . 11 I. Aleksandrov Article, 11 July 1968 PRAVDA . 11 Warsaw Five] Meeting Letter to the CPCZ Central Committee, 17 July 1968 . 17 Editorial Article, 22 July 1968 PRAVDA . 24 I. Aleksandrov Article, 18 August 1968 PRAVDA . 29 Justification for Intervention.. ... 32 TASS Statement, 21 August 1968 . 32 Editorial Article, 22 August 1968 PRAVDA . ... 34 Brezhnev Doctrine . .. 63 Excerpts From Sergey Kovalev Article, 26 September 1968 PRAVDA . .. 63 Excerpts From Brezhnev Speech to the Fifth PZPR Congress, 12 Novem ber 1968 . 63 FOR O ICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFIC L USE ONLY FBIS SPECIAL, MEMORANDUM 4 NOVEMBER 1980 - 1 - PUBLIC WARNING INDICATORS OF THE SOVIET DECISION TO INVADE CZECHOSLOVAKIA A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW I NTRODUCT ION The poss ibilityj]that the current crisis in Poland could deteriorate to the point that the Soviet Union felt .compelled to intervene prompts reconsideration of the lessons that can be learned from the Soviet action in Czechoslovakia 12 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes to Understand Migration Policy with International Trade Theoretical Tools
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Cebreros, Alfonso; Chiquiar, Daniel; Roa, Mónica; Tobal, Martín Working Paper Notes to understand migration policy with international trade theoretical tools Working Papers, No. 2017-03 Provided in Cooperation with: Bank of Mexico, Mexico City Suggested Citation: Cebreros, Alfonso; Chiquiar, Daniel; Roa, Mónica; Tobal, Martín (2017) : Notes to understand migration policy with international trade theoretical tools, Working Papers, No. 2017-03, Banco de México, Ciudad de México This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/174456 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen
    [Show full text]
  • AND 'SOCIALIST W(,N"~N • NOTHING to OFFER MILITANTS the SHEFFIELD NHS Stewards Conference SO Supporters, It Was by and Large Left to WP the Time Being, Unshakeable
    ,.. • INS I • ENTRYISM GAY RIGHTS SPANISH ELECTIONS , ••••• I11 :::;:;:'::::::::::::::::~:~:r~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~{:~:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:t~~ STOP THE BETRAYALS! STOP TH'E RETREAT! THE EMPLOYERS AND the Tory oppose them and who are now busy ca I" Government have notched up im~ v,ing out a bosses' labour Government portant new victories for their class. as their alternative to Thatcher have Leyland workers have voted to ac­ lived to dodge a fight another day. Or cept a two year package deal that so they hope. gives them only a 5%% pay rise Thatcher, and her primed cheer lead­ each year. Meass meetings reversed ers in the gutter press, are riding high. As a direct result of the spineless parlia­ previous decisions to resist manage­ mentarians in Labour leadership this ment's plans. Miners have voted to hated and barbarous government is well accept the NCB's pay offer and fai ahead in the opinion polls. The govern­ failed to give the NUM executive a ment is now set to reap more fruit for mandate to ca" strike action again­ its class by introducing yet another st tile Tories. round of anti-union laws frol)"l Tebbit's The wretched leaders of the stable and a share out of profitable TUC Health Committee took these plums shaken from the trees of the decisions as a signal that they could nationalised industries and social and welfare services. now prepare the final derailment These are all aefeats for the working of the health workers dispute. They class in general. The "o~y government is called off the November 8th Day out for even more blood and the Labour of Action, with no new money on and TUC leaders will not stop them.
    [Show full text]
  • A Socialist Schism
    A Socialist Schism: British socialists' reaction to the downfall of Milošević by Andrew Michael William Cragg Submitted to Central European University Department of History In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Professor Marsha Siefert Second Reader: Professor Vladimir Petrović CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2017 Copyright notice Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author. CEU eTD Collection i Abstract This work charts the contemporary history of the socialist press in Britain, investigating its coverage of world events in the aftermath of the fall of state socialism. In order to do this, two case studies are considered: firstly, the seventy-eight day NATO bombing campaign over the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in 1999, and secondly, the overthrow of Slobodan Milošević in October of 2000. The British socialist press analysis is focused on the Morning Star, the only English-language socialist daily newspaper in the world, and the multiple publications affiliated to minor British socialist parties such as the Socialist Workers’ Party and the Communist Party of Great Britain (Provisional Central Committee). The thesis outlines a broad history of the British socialist movement and its media, before moving on to consider the case studies in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Braverman and the Structure of the US Working Class
    Employ Respons Rights J (2014) 26:219–236 DOI 10.1007/s10672-014-9243-4 Braverman and the Structure of the U.S. Working Class: Beyond the Degradation of Labor R. Jamil Jonna & John Bellamy Foster Published online: 4 July 2014 # Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 Abstract The fortieth anniversary of Harry Braverman’s Labor and Monopoly Capital is the occasion here for a reassessment of his work as a whole. Braverman’s analysis of the degradation of work is shown to have been only a part of a much larger argument he was developing on the structure of the U.S. working class. Building on his pioneering empirical research into occupational composition, a new empirical assessment of the structural evolution of the U.S. working class over the last four decades is provided, throwing light on current problems of unemployment, underemployment, and socially wasted labor—and the rights of labor. Keywords Braverman . Labor and monopoly capital . Labor process . Working class . New middle class . Degradation of work . Deskilling . Reskilling . Reserve army of labor. Capitalism Braverman and the Structure of the U.S. Working Class: Beyond the Degradation of Labor Harry Braverman’s Labor and Monopoly Capital, first published 40 years ago in 1974 (Braverman 1998), was unquestionably the work that, in the words of historian Bryan Palmer (1999:33),“literally christened the emerging field of labor process studies.” In the four decades since its appearance Braverman’s book has continued to play a central role in debates on workers’ struggles within industry, remaining indispensable to all attempts at in- depth critique in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Biopolitics of Unwaged Immaterial Labour
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 6-28-2012 12:00 AM Will Work For Free: Examining the Biopolitics of Unwaged Immaterial Labour Brian A. Brown The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Nick Dyer-Witheford The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Media Studies A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Brian A. Brown 2012 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Film and Media Studies Commons, and the Photography Commons Recommended Citation Brown, Brian A., "Will Work For Free: Examining the Biopolitics of Unwaged Immaterial Labour" (2012). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 620. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/620 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WILL WORK FOR FREE: EXAMINING THE BIOPOLITICS OF UNWAGED IMMATERIAL LABOUR (Spine title: Will Work For Free) (Thesis format: Monograph) by: Brian A. Brown Graduate Program in Media Studies A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Brian A. Brown THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies CERTIFICATE OF EXAMINATION Supervisor: Examiners: __________________________________ ___________________________________ Dr. Nick Dyer-Witheford Dr. Sharon Sliwinski – Program Examiner Supervisory Committee: __________________________________ ___________________________________ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Trade, Closed Borders: Immigration in the Era of Globalization
    Open Trade, Closed Borders: Immigration in the Era of Globalization Margaret E. Peters1 Yale University Forthcoming: World Politics Accepted 17 June 2014 Abstract This paper argues that trade and immigration policy cannot be studied as separate policies but instead scholars must take an integrated view of these two foreign economic policies. Trade and immigration policy are substitutes. The choice of trade policy affects immigration policy in labor scarce countries through its effects on firms. Closure to trade increases the average firm level demand for immigration, leading to immigration openness, and free trade decreases the average firm demand, leading to restricted immigration. To test this argument, I develop a new dataset on the immigration policies of 19 states from the late 18th century through the early 21st century. This is one of the few datasets on immigration policy and is the only one to cover the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries. The data show that indeed, trade policy has the hypothesized effect on immigration; immigration policy cannot be fully understood without examining trade policy. This paper, therefore, suggests that trade and other foreign economic policies should be examined in light of immigration policy and each other as well. 1 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Yale University, 115 Prospect St., New Haven, CT 06520; [email protected]. I would like to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their comments. I would like to thank Judith Goldstein for her comments on several drafts as well as financial support for the project. I would also like to thank Michael Tomz, Kenneth Schultz, James Fearon, Jon Pevehouse, Jeffery Colgan, Ashley Jester, Andrew Kerner, James Morrison, Molly Roberts, David Steinberg and Felicity Vabulas for their comments and suggestions as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgarian Foreign Policy in the Context of the Prague Spring
    Bulgarian Foreign Policy in the Context of the Prague Spring By Metodi Metodiev Submitted to Central European University History Department In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Professor Constantin Iordachi Second Reader: Professor Roumen Daskalov Budapest, Hungary CEU eTD Collection 2009 “Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author.” CEU eTD Collection Abstract The thesis deals with the Bulgaria’s foreign policy during the Prague Spring 1968. The main accent is on the level of the involvement in the decision-making process of Bulgaria as a participant in the Warsaw Pact. The process is represented in the context of the general development of the reform the crisis between Czechoslovakia and the state-members of the Warsaw Pact. In addition it represents in the internal division in terms of motivation on behalf of the so called “satellite states” – East Germany, Poland and Hungary, and the place of Bulgaria in this context. The contribution of the thesis consists of the exploration of the evolution of the foreign political doctrine expressed by Bulgaria and its contribution to the process of Elaboration of the Brezhnev Doctrine. CEU eTD Collection Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Communist Worker As a New Citizen in History. an Essay on the Three Phases of Hungarian Socialism1
    THE COMMUNIST WORKER AS A NEW CITIZEN IN HISTORY. AN ESSAY ON THE THREE PHASES OF HUNGARIAN SOCIALISM1 Márton Szabó In Hungary, there were three different phases of socialism in the twentieth century. The Hungarian Soviet Republic that existed for a few months in 1919, the years of a personality cult after 1947, and the soft dictatorship of János Kádár for approximately thirty years after the 1956 revolution was crushed. These phases were different from each other in a number of respects, but in all three the representatives of political power contrasted their efforts with the bourgeois societies of Western Europe and with the past of the country. In other words, they attempted to create a new world and an alternative society in a po- litical and cultural sense. This was characteristic not only of Hungary, but also of other countries in the region. If one studies the ideological literature of the period, one frequent- ly comes across a remarkable expression in the discourse: socialist/ communist worker.2 “Worker” can be an economic concept, it can mean the employee with his working capacities, and it can also be a socio- logical concept denoting physical or intellectual workers. In socialist ideology, however, the concept was not used in these meanings. The word “worker” referred to the citizens of socialist/communist society; it was used both as a counter-concept and as an identity concept. (cf. Koselleck 2004a.) The polemical character of the concept is obvious; as an anti-concept, it denied both feudal and bourgeois societies. The worker was not a noble person or an aristocrat, neither was he a capi- 19 THE COMMUNIST WORKER AS A NEW CITIZEN..
    [Show full text]
  • From the Labour Question to the Labour History Question Chad Pearson
    review essay / note critique From the Labour Question to the Labour History Question Chad Pearson McIlroy, John, Alan Campbell, John Halstead, and David Martin, eds., Making History: Organizations of Labour Historians in Britain since 1960 (Leeds: Maney Publishing Press 2010) Allen, Joan, Alan Campbell and John McIlroy, eds., Histories of Labour: National and International Perspectives (London: Merlin Press 2010) Haverty-Stacke, Donna, and Daniel J. Walkowitz, eds., Rethinking U.S. Labor History: Essays on the Working-Class Experience, 1756–2009 (New York: Continuum International Publishing 2010) The essays in these collections, several of which were published to coin- cide with the fiftieth anniversary of England’s Society for the Study of Labour History (sslh), address numerous issues that will undoubtedly interest his- torians of labour and the working class: the development of labour history associations, the relationship between scholarship and labour activism, the tensions between public and academic history, the political orientation of labour historians, the emergence of professional conferences and peer- reviewed journals, methodological innovations, and the overall state of the field today. Anniversaries, especially this one, which also marks the fiftieth anniversary of the US journal, Labor History, provide a good opportunity to reflect on the subject’s health and even predict future developments.1 For the most part, the articles under review will spark curiosity, raise questions, and stimulate further debate and discussion. 1. For a survey of the development of this journal, see Melvyn Dubofsky, “A Stroll Down Memory Lane: My Fifty Years-Plus Association with Labor History,” Labor History, 50 (November 2009), 399–408. Chad Pearson, “From the Labour Question to the Labour History Question,” Labour/Le Travail, 66 (Fall 2010), 195–230.
    [Show full text]