DOCSLIB.ORG

Tidworth Community Area - Core Policy 17

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tidworth Community Area - Core Policy 17 Responses to Question 17 – Tidworth Community Area - Core Policy 17 Cross ID Comments Officer Comments Issue Reference The North Wessex Downs AONB supports reference to the AONB but this has not been fully explained within the policy. There are issues over impact on the setting of the AONB from the Drummond Park Noted. The site area for the allocation does extend beyond development (which have led to changes of the planning application). Reference to the AONB should the current application site. Further consideration will be 149 SO5 AONB be included in the Drummond Park section. The inset map with map 5.16 is also questioned as it given on how the impact on the setting of the AONB can be appears to show Drummond Park extending across the main road and towards the AONB to the north, better referenced and mitigated against which does not accord with the existing application site area and takes in a greenfield site. I am content with the general principles of a strategy. I will, however, limit my comments to the Tidworth Community Area. I am concerned at the lack of highway infrastructure improvements for Ludgershall and believe that more flexibility is required in terms of the housing and employment allocations for the area. Ludgershall’s Memorial Junction is nearing capacity but the financial contributions that have been and will be set aside for highway solutions will not even scratch the surface. The only way to resolve the problem is to provide a second road that runs parallel with the existing A342 or a bypass for the town. This can only be achieved through further development over and above the developments planned at Granby Gardens and Drummond Park. I am not necessarily saying that we should include another 1000 Noted. The future of the vehicle depot is still to be clarified. plans in the strategy, which would provide a bypass, but allow for a windfall site or sites that would allow These comments will be passed to the highways team and Highway 201 for highway infrastructure improvements for Ludgershall. However, any such windfall site should only be a further assessment of the traffic situation in Ludgershall infrastructure allowed if the MOD sells the old vehicle depot for development. This would allow for a potential bypass will be included in the next round of the core strategy. to be built. The old vehicle depot should be an industrial park and housing with the land beyond Empress Way leading to the A342 beyond Faberstown being allocated for housing which would provide the remainder of the bypass. The old vehicle depot is potentially very important for the local economy as Castledown Business Park will not sustain the local employment needs on its own if the land beyond Empress Way and the vehicle depot were to be sold for housing. It must, therefore, be at least a mixed development or just industrial. Both areas can only be looked at as a joint venture as singularly they will worsen Ludgershall’s road problems. Moving to Tidworth itself, if the MOD does not require site 19 for housing, this should be a reserve housing site for civilian growth in the town. Ludgershall could take a lot more housing but will need a bypass on NE. quadrant to tke traffic to 303. The current application does included detailed proposals Highway 980 Zog should contribute more money in the implementation of this strategy. I could also open up more on NE site for a bypass. infrastructure prospect for the vehicle depot. We support the recognition of the land at Drummond Park (MSA Depot) as capable for accommodating 550 dwellings and as a key development priority for the Tidworth Community Area. We broadly support the issues to be addressed in the planning for the Tidworth Community Area - subject to the following comments: Whilst we note the reference to the low concentration of employment sites, it should also be noted that the Castledown Business Park is significantly under utilised and has capacity to accommodate substantial growth. Residential development at Drummond Park will help support improvements to Castledown Business Park, by providing new homes to support a future workforce. Hence, there should be policy support to new development which will help support the future phases of employment development at Castledown Business Park; We agree that Ludgershall offers only limited Support Noted. Comment regarding employment and CiL Drummond 1002 retail development (and that this is somewhat fragmented). In our view, policy should encourage new CP3 and developer contributions will passed on to the relevant Park Strategic development within Ludgershall (which will draw in new residents and investment) which can stimulate officer. Site an improvement in facilities; We recognise that there has been disparity between the military and civilian employment within the area. We consider that the development of the Castledown Business Park is a positive non-military employment provider and will encourage a greater civilian base to the area, thus addressing the imbalance. Furthermore the redevelopment of Drummond Park will provide significant housing opportunities to encourage a non-military population to the area; We agree that the settlements of Tidworth and Ludgershall have the potential for new growth on previously developed land, particularly on sites which are well related to the town centres. We consider that Drummond Park is prime example of an appropriate brownfield development which provides good links (pedestrian, Cross ID Comments Officer Comments Issue Reference cycling and via public transport improvements) to the town centre. Whilst we note support the list of ‘essential infrastructure requirements' for the Tidworth community area, however it is fundamental that Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) in accordance with the CIL Regulations 2011, strikes a balance between securing additional investment for infrastructure to support development and the potential economic effect of imposing CIL upon development across their area. It is vital that the Council identifies the total cost of the ‘essential infrastructure requirements' that it desires to fun from CIL. In order to do this, Wiltshire will need to consider what additional infrastructure is needed in its area to support development. It is vital that future policy relating to developer contributions is flexible and recognises the need to encourage rather than restrain development. When establishing the scope and scale of developer contributions required to support new development, the Council should also take into account individual sites costs, scheme viability and other scheme requirements. Given the current economic climate, it may not be possible for developers/developments to provide the full contributions sought. Accordingly, the Council should encourage developers/applicants to submit an ‘open-book' viability assessment to demonstrate the maximum level of contribution which could be supported. If the level of growth envisaged/required is to be delivered, in accordance with the emerging National Planning Policy Framework, policy should ensure that the scale of obligations should not burden the sites ability to be developed, viably. To ensure viability, the costs of any requirements likely to be applied to development, such as requirements for affordable housing, local standards, infrastructure contributions or other requirements should, when taking account of the normal cost of development and on-site mitigation, provide acceptable returns to a willing land owner and willing developer to enable the development to be deliverable. There is no mention in the Core Policy of the North Wessex Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Noted. Consideration will be given to improving references 1032 (AONB). Any development must have due regard to the AONB, including an assessment of the likely to AONB and the setting of AONB in regards to the AONB impact of proposed development on the AONB. allocated site. Tidworth. We note that the Site Selection topic paper states that the only strategic allocation in this Noted. The site boundary has not been extended beyond Community Area is 550 dwellings on brownfield land on land at Drummond Park, Ludgershall. However, that set out in the Site Selection topic paper. The land to we also note that the strategic allocation includes land to the north east of the A342. Whilst detailed the north of the A342 has been assessed alongside the rest work (not submitted as part of this consultation) has established that, subject to suitable landscaping, of the site, there is no greenfield land to the south east of the land to the south west of the A342 could be developed without unacceptable impact on the North 1103 the allocation although this may refer to land to the south AONB Wessex Downs AONB, there is no evidence to demonstrate that the land to the north east of the A342 west. Consideration will be given to the impact of these would have an acceptable impact. It also includes greenfield land to the South East of Drummond Park, greenfield sections of the allocation on areas that might be which we regard as a valuable (albeit non designated) landscape asset. We are thus not clear why the considered valuable landscape assets or likely to affect the boundaries of the allocation extend beyond that stated in the Site Selection topic paper, and advise that, setting of the AONB. to be justified, they are adjusted to that given in the Site Selection topic paper. Consultation on emerging Wiltshire Core Strategy Development Plan Document Ludgershall Town Council broadly accepts the above document, however listed below are their comments which relate to Ludgershall. The housing developments proposed at Drummond Park, Granby Gardens and possible Empress Way will provide approximately 1,000 new dwellings in the area. The lack of major highway infrastructure work needs to be addressed urgently with a bypass or link road to alleviate traffic from High Street, Castle Street and Butt Street, part of the conservation area of Ludgershall, this area must be protected.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LAND at GRANBY GARDENS, LUDGERSHALL Transport Assessment
    LAND AT GRANBY GARDENS, LUDGERSHALL Transport Assessment 06/12/2012 Confidentiality: Public Quality Management Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Date 6th December 2012 Prepared by Grace Blizard Signature Checked by Stuart Morton Signature Authorised by Rhod Macleod Signature Project number 11790116 Report number File reference J:\11790116 - Granby Gardens - Ludgershall\TEXT\REPORTS\Transport Assessment (Nov2012)\Transport Assessment (181 dwellings) - Nov12.docx Project number: 11790116 Dated: 06/12/2012 2 | 53 Revised: LAND AT GRANBY GARDENS, LUDGERSHALL Transport Assessment 06/12/2012 Client Foreman Homes Group Unit 1 Station Industrial Park Duncan Road Park Gate Hampshire SO31 1BX Consultant WSP Group Limited Regus House Southampton SO18 2RZ UK Tel: +44 (0)23 8030 2529 Fax: +44 (0)23 8030 2001 www.wspgroup.co.uk Registered Address WSP UK Limited 01383511 WSP House, 70 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1AF WSP Contacts Rhod MacLeod 02380 302568 [email protected] Stuart Morton 02380 302556 [email protected] 3 | 53 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................... 5 2 Policy Context ........................................................................... 7 3 Existing Conditions.................................................................. 12 4 Accessibility ............................................................................ 22 5 Development Proposals .......................................................... 25 6 Development
    [Show full text]
  • Needs Analysis for Wiltshire and Swindon
    Needs Analysis for Wiltshire and Swindon January 2021 Contents Population profile ..................................................................................................... 4 Deprivation ............................................................................................................. 19 Economy ................................................................................................................. 42 Education, skills and training ................................................................................. 49 Health, wellbeing and disability ........................................................................... 64 Housing ................................................................................................................... 82 Children and young people ................................................................................. 91 Older people ........................................................................................................ 114 Community strength ............................................................................................ 125 Accessibility and isolation ................................................................................... 137 Covid-19 ................................................................................................................ 150 Appendix A – Indicators used in this report ....................................................... 167 2 Needs Analysis for Wiltshire and Swindon 2021 Introduction This report,
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Note: Comments on the Use of Groundwater and River Flow Models, Focused on the Candover Stream Simulation in the Test and Itchen Model
    1 © Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited Technical Note: Comments on the use of groundwater and river flow models, focused on the Candover Stream simulation in the Test and Itchen Model Background and comments from World Wildlife Fund (UK) Scope, author and reviewer Rob Soley at Amec Foster Wheeler was asked by Southern Water Services to compile this Technical Note in response to comments made by WWF on the use of the Test and Itchen Groundwater (and River Flow) Model to support the assessment of flow impacts on the Candover Stream (sometimes named as the Candover Brook). Rob has led the development and use of groundwater and river flow models across many of the Chalk catchments in Southern and Eastern England. He has also worked closely with the Environment Agency and other regulators over the last 16 years to design and improve the water resource assessment and environmental flow screening approaches used in Catchment Abstraction Management Strategies, and in support of EU Habitats Directive and Water Framework Directive objectives across the UK. The note has been reviewed by Tim Power at Amec Foster Wheeler who has carried out or managed all of the groundwater and river flow modelling for the Test and Itchen. (Within the appendices to this report, there is reference to work carried out by Entec UK Ltd and AMEC E&I UK Ltd – both of which are predecessor companies to Amec Foster Wheeler E&I UK Ltd). Comments from WWF (UK) A joint letter from Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust (Chief Executive Debbie Tann)
    [Show full text]
  • Wiltshire Child Poverty Needs Assessment
    Wiltshire Child Poverty Needs Assessment 2014 1 CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................. 4 2. BACKGROUND........................................................................................... 6 3. CHILD POVERTY MEASURES 6 4. SETTING THE SCENE................................................................................ 7 5. CHILD POVERTY IN WILTSHIRE ............................................................... 8 5.1 Children at Greatest Risk of Poverty………………….....................................8 5.2 Children Living in Poverty .......................................................................... 10 5.3 Index of Multiple Deprivation...................................................................... 15 5.4 Free School Meals..................................................................................... 18 5.5 Worklessness and low paid work ............................................................... 21 5.6 The Association and Impact of Lone Parent Families on Child Poverty ..... 23 5.7 The Association and Impact of Disability on Child Poverty......................... 26 5.8 The Impact of Large Families…………………………………………………..27 5.9 Impact of the recession.............................................................................. 28 5.10 The Impact of Housing…………………………………………………………..31 6. THE IMPACT OF POVERTY ..................................................................... 32 6.1. Attainment Gap.........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kellys Directory Extract 1939 Ludgershall
    Kellys Directory Extract 1939 Ludgershall LUDGERSHALL is a parish and village, situated in a hollow, bounded on the south-west by an extensive open country and contiguous to the borders of Chute Forest and the Hampshire boundary and Collingbourne woods, with a station on the Great Western railway, 7 miles north-west from Andover, 17 miles north-east from Salisbury, and 73 from London, in the Devizes division of the county, hundred of Amesbury, Everleigh and Pewsey petty sessional division, Pewsey rural district, Andover county court, rural deanery of Amesbury (Amesbury portion), and archdeaconry and diocese of Salisbury. This was formerly a market town of considerable importance and a borough by prescription, which sent representatives to Parliament at intervals from the time of Edward 1, but was disfranchised by the Municipal Corporations Act 1832 (5 and 6 Wm. IV c 76). Electricity and main water are available. The church of St. James is an ancient edifice of flint and stone in the Norman and Early English styles, consisting of chancel, nave, transepts, south porch and an embattled western tower, with four pinnacles, containing a clock and 6 bells. In 1908 the existing bells were rehung and a sixth added by Mrs and Miss Awdry in memory of the Rev. W. H. Awdry M.A. rector 1872-1899. The tower was heightened in 1871 in memory of Richard Thomas Everett, by his widow. In a window on the south side of the chancel are the arms of Henry Chicheley, Archbishop of Canterbury 1414-1443. Near the south porch is a recess containing a tomb with shields of arms and two recumbent effigies, erected in 1558, to Sir Richard and Lady Brydges, ancestors of the dukes of Buckingham and Chandos.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No.580
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No.580 Review of Non-Metropolitan Counties COUNTY OF HAM^SH.R cine its )ourx dries with DORSET, WEST SUSS cine WLT'S LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION t'Qll ENGLAND REPORT NO .580 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell Members Professor G E Cherry Mr K F J Ennals Mr G R Prentice Mrs H R V Sarkany Mr B Scholes THE RT. HON. CHRISTOPHER PATTEN MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF NON-METROPOLITAN COUNTIES THE COUNTY OF HAMPSHIRE AND ITS BOUNDARIES WITH DORSET, WEST SUSSEX AND WILTSHIRE COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT AND PROPOSALS INTRODUCTION 1. On 27 January 1986 we wrote to Hampshire County Council announcing our intention to undertake a review of the county under section 48(1) of the Local Government Act 1972. Copies of our letter were sent to all the principal local authorities and parishes in Hampshire and in the adjoining counties of Berkshire, Dorset, Isle of Wight, Surrey, West Sussex and Wiltshire; to the National and County Associations of Local Councils; to Members of Parliament with constituency interests and to the headquarters of the main political parties. In addition, copies were sent to those government departments with an interest; the Wessex Health Authority; the public utilities; the English Tourist Board; port authorities in the county; the editors of the Municipal Journal and Local Government Chronicle and to local television and radio stations serving the area. 2. The County Councils were requested to co-operate as necessary with each other and with the District Councils concerned, to assist us in publicising the start of the review by inserting a notice for two successive weeks in local newspapers so as to give a wide coverage in the area concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Appraisal for Revised Local Plan DPD 2011 – 2029 Incorporating Strategic Environmental Assessment
    Sustainability Appraisal for Revised Local Plan DPD 2011 – 2029 Incorporating Strategic Environmental Assessment Main Report November 2013 Council Borough Valley Test SA November 2013 Commenting on this Document This Sustainability Appraisal report has been published alongside the Revised Local Plan DPD, with both subject to public consultation from 24th January to 4.30pm on 7th March 2014. Only representations made within this period will be taken into account. This document is available for inspection at the Council’s Andover and Romsey offices during normal office hours. It is also available on the Council’s website at http://www.testvalley.gov.uk/resident/planningandbuildingcontrol/planningpolicy/local- development-framework/sustainability-appraisal/. If you would like to comment on this document please send your views to the address below or the email address. You can also comment via the Council’s website. Your correspondence will be available for public inspection and for copying in accordance with the provisions of the Access to Information Act. Should you have any questions please contact the Planning Policy team. Planning Policy Council Test Valley Borough Council Beech Hurst Weyhill Road Andover SP10 3AJ T: 01264 368000 W: www.testvalley.gov.uk/ldf/ Borough E: [email protected] Valley Test 1 SA November 2013 Contents Page 1 Introduction and Background ........................................................................... 4 Introduction .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite, Aerial and Security Installers
    M & V REMOVALS August 16th, 2021 Ace Framing & HOUSE MOVES Art Gallery 122 The Commercial Centre, AND DELIVERIES Picket Piece Telephone: Weekdays 8am - 5pm, Late night Weds until 8pm 01264 332986 Saturday 9am - 5pm, closed Sunday 01264 353677 or 07517 212000 Satellite, Aerial and Security installers l Alterations ll Alterations Extensions l l LET ME DRIVE YOU Alterations l Renovations • TV Aerial Installations and Repairs l Extensions New Builds Est. 2011 l ll Renovations Home Improvements Extensions l Insurance Work LET ME CLEAN YOUR CAR • Sky & FreeSat Installations l New Builds TRADITIONAL MOBILE l ALL TYPES OF BUILDING WORK & Renovations MAINTENANCEl CARRIED OUT & GUARANTEED • Plasma & LCD Television Installations Home Improvements CAR WASH SERVICE FREE ESTIMATES I come to you l ll Alterations • FM & DAB Radio InstallationsNew Builds l Insurance T: 01264 790500 Work Prices from £30 Extensions l l Renovations FULLY COVID COMPLIANT • Multi-room Audio l Installations AlterationsHome (Sonos) Improvements lALL New TYPES Builds OF BUILDING What’s app 07759 646479 lWORK Home & Improvements MAINTENANCE • Commercial (IRS, l CCTV) lUnit 4D, Insurance Fitz Gilbert Court, Castledown Work Business Park, TRUSTED AIRPORT ExtensionsInsurance WorkCARRIEDTidworth Road, OUT Ludgershall, & GUARANTEED Wiltshire SP11 9FA. • European & Motorised • Intruder Alarms www.willmontbuilding.co.ukALL TYPES OF BUILDING WORK & TRANSFER SERVICES l [email protected] CARRIED ESTIMATES OUT & GUARANTEED • CCTV Systems • AccessRenovations Control FREE ESTIMATES Let me drive you to: ALL TYPES OF BUILDINGT: WORK01264 790500 & AIRPORTS, SEAPORTS, EVENTS l T: 01264 790500 SHOPPING, BLUEWATER, For a friendly and professionalNew Builds service MAINTENANCE CARRIED OUT & GUARANTEED BICESTER VILLAGE, AND MORE call us today l on: Home Improvements Call the award winning Unit 4D, Fitz Gilbert Court, Castledown Business Park, l AlterationsFREE ESTIMATESUnitTidworth 4D, Road, FitzLudgershall, Gilbert Wiltshire SP11Court, 9FA.
    [Show full text]
  • Kennet – a Community Strategy
    KDC Feb 2006 Kennet – A Community Strategy 2005 - 2015 The Kennet Local Strategic Partnership (KLSP) is committed to working together for the long term sustainability and improvement to our district. This plan has been developed to set out our long term vision and aspirations of our communities and to:- ♦ Provide the links between the Local Area Strategies and the Wiltshire Wide Strategy. ♦ Set the agenda for the LSP. ♦ Resolve potential conflict between existing plans & strategies. ♦ Identify the key priorities at Kennet level. ♦ Enable Kennet to influence decision making at county, regional and national level. ♦ Help strengthen priorities at local level. In developing this plan the KLSP is mindful of the four key components required:- ♦ A long term vision for the area focussing on the outcomes that will be achieved; ♦ An action plan identifying shorter term priorities and activities that will contribute to the achievement of the long term outcomes; ♦ A shared commitment by the partnership to the implementation of the action plan and proposals for doing so, and ♦ Arrangements for monitoring the implementation of the action plan and for periodically reviewing the Community Plan. 1 KDC Feb 2006 Background to Kennet The district of Kennet covers 370 square miles and is one of the most sparsely populated districts in England with a population in 2004/05 of 74,305. There are 0.77 people per hectare compared to a national average of 3.45. (source: Office of National Census (ONCS) 2001). The district includes in the south, Salisbury Plain and to the north the Marlborough Downs. Scattered round the district are over 70 villages and hamlets and the towns of Devizes, Marlborough and Tidworth.
    [Show full text]
  • A338/A346 HGV Registration Plate Survey October 2006
    A338/A346 HGV Registration Plate Survey October 2006 Survey Report August 2007 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Nature of Report This report has been produced to outline the results of the HGV survey undertaken in October 2006 on the A338/A346 corridor, and the A345, between the A303 and M4 Junction 15 (Plough Hill). 1.2 Background The A338/A346 forms part of the National Primary Route between Swindon/M4 and Salisbury. It is predominantly a single carriageway road, and passes through several communities, including Marlborough (see Figure 1.1). The A346 also provides a connection to Ludgershall, and via the A342, to Andover and the A303. There have been long-standing concerns in communities along the A338/A346 corridor regarding the number of through Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGVs) using the route. However, following the opening of the A34 Newbury Bypass in November 1998, it was anticipated that there would be a transfer of HGVs away from the A338/A346 onto the more suitable A34/M4 route. Surveys undertaken by the County Council in 1999 affirmed this to be the case, with a significant reduction in the number of long-distance HGVs, particularly articulated lorries. However, despite this, local concern remains that the route is still being used by large numbers of long-distance HGV traffic as it is a shorter route (in terms of distance) to get to the M4 at Junction 15 from the south coast ports, than using the recognised strategic freight route of the A303/A34/M4(J13). This concern has been highlighted in Community Area Transport Strategies produced for the Marlborough and Tidworth Community Areas, with aspirations that some form of alleviation will be afforded to communities along the route corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • A Greatday out By
    The Wiltshire Day Rover is issued and accepted on the following bus companies services in Wiltshire and surrounding counties Adult £7 Buy a Wiltshire Day Rover and travel Operator Validity Enquiries and Child/OAP £5 Complaints right through! AD Rains All Services (including to/from Cirencester) Tel 01666 510874 Wiltshire Day Rover tickets allow you unlimited Family £14 Andybus All Services (including service 93 to/from Cirencester and 41 to/from Yate) Tel 01666 825655 travel on the buses of the participating companies APL Travel All Services (including to/from Cirencester) Tel 01666 577774 as listed. The system is simple. You board your Beeline Coaches All Services (including to/from Bath) Tel 01985 213503 first bus and pay the driver, who will give you a Bodman Coaches All Services (including to/from Bath) Tel 01380 722393 ticket and a Wiltshire Day Rover wallet. Coachstyle All Services (including to/from Bath) Tel 01249 782224 Seal the ticket inside the wallet. When you receive Connect2 Wiltshire All Services N.B. Most journeys must be booked in advance Booking Line 08456 Tel 01380 860100 525255 (except C2W taxis) your Day Rover ticket, check that the date and First All Wiltshire Services, (including to/from Bath and Frome). Also valid on service 158 Tel 0845 606 4446 price are correct. between Shaftesbury, Gillingham, Mere and Wincanton only. (Western Wiltshire) Remember the Wiltshire Day Rover ticket Tel 01823 272033 is only valid on the services of the bus companies out by (Mere & Yeovil area) eat day listed overleaf. A gr Faresaver All Wiltshire Services (including to/from Bath) Tel 01249 444444 Frome Minibuses All Wiltshire Services (including to/from Frome) Tel 01373 471474 Senior citizens not eligible for free transport in Hatts Coaches All Services Tel 01249 740444 Wiltshire could include visitors from Scotland, Levers Coaches All Services (including to/from Shaftesbury) Tel 01722 714229 Wales and abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordnance Survey Plan Published 1984 Source Map Scale
    Ordnance Survey Plan Published 1984 Source map scale - 1:2,500 The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas and by 1896 it covered the whole of what were considered to be the cultivated parts of Great Britain. The published date given below is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas. Map Name(s) and Date(s) Historical Map - Segment A13 Order Details Order Number: 37535614_1_1 Customer Ref: 12840 National Grid Reference: 426510, 150380 Slice: A Site Area (Ha): 5.84 Search Buffer (m): 100 Site Details Granby Gardens, Ludgershall, ANDOVER, Hampshire, SP11 9RG Tel: 0844 844 9952 Fax: 0844 844 9951 Web: www.envirocheck.co.uk A Landmark Information Group Service v46.0 09-Feb-2012 Page 7 of 15 Supply of Unpublished Survey Information Published 1975 Source map scale - 1:2,500 SUSI maps (Supply of Unpublished Survey Information) were produced between 1972 and 1977, mainly for internal use at Ordnance Survey. These were more of a `work-in-progress' plan as they showed updates of individual areas on a map. These maps were unpublished, and they do not represent a single moment in time. They were produced at both 1:2,500 and 1:1,250 scales. Map Name(s) and Date(s) Historical Map - Segment A13 Order Details
    [Show full text]