DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No.580

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No.580 Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No.580 Review of Non-Metropolitan Counties COUNTY OF HAM^SH.R cine its )ourx dries with DORSET, WEST SUSS cine WLT'S LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION t'Qll ENGLAND REPORT NO .580 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell Members Professor G E Cherry Mr K F J Ennals Mr G R Prentice Mrs H R V Sarkany Mr B Scholes THE RT. HON. CHRISTOPHER PATTEN MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF NON-METROPOLITAN COUNTIES THE COUNTY OF HAMPSHIRE AND ITS BOUNDARIES WITH DORSET, WEST SUSSEX AND WILTSHIRE COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT AND PROPOSALS INTRODUCTION 1. On 27 January 1986 we wrote to Hampshire County Council announcing our intention to undertake a review of the county under section 48(1) of the Local Government Act 1972. Copies of our letter were sent to all the principal local authorities and parishes in Hampshire and in the adjoining counties of Berkshire, Dorset, Isle of Wight, Surrey, West Sussex and Wiltshire; to the National and County Associations of Local Councils; to Members of Parliament with constituency interests and to the headquarters of the main political parties. In addition, copies were sent to those government departments with an interest; the Wessex Health Authority; the public utilities; the English Tourist Board; port authorities in the county; the editors of the Municipal Journal and Local Government Chronicle and to local television and radio stations serving the area. 2. The County Councils were requested to co-operate as necessary with each other and with the District Councils concerned, to assist us in publicising the start of the review by inserting a notice for two successive weeks in local newspapers so as to give a wide coverage in the area concerned. The County Councils were also asked to ensure that the issue of the consultation letter was drawn to the attention of the police and to services in respect of which they have a statutory function, such as the administration of justice. 3. A period of six months from the date of the letter was allowed for local authorities, including those in the adjoining counties, and any other person or body interested in the review, to send to us their views in detail on whether changes to the county boundary were desirable and, if so, what they should be and how they would serve the interests of effective and convenient local government, the criterion laid down in the Act. THE SUBMISSIONS MADE TO US 4. The submissions made to us included various recommendations for changes to Hampshire's boundary with all the adjoining counties. The suggestions for changes put forward in respect of the boundary between Hampshire and Surrey are being dealt with under the review of Surrey, which is still in progress. Our Report No. 558 dealt with the boundary between Hampshire and Berkshire and was sent to your predecessor on 31 August 1988. A suggestion for change to Hampshire's seaward boundary with the Isle of Wight is being considered in the context of a separate review under Section 71 of the Local Government Act 1972. This review, therefore, deals only with Hampshire's boundaries with Dorset, West Sussex and Wiltshire. 5. In response to our consultation letter we received 64 representations concerning those boundaries, from the County Councils of Dorset, Hampshire, West Sussex and Wiltshire; the Borough and the District Councils of Chichester, Christchurch, East Dorset, East Hampshire, Havant, Kennet, New Forest, Salisbury and Test Valley; the Parish Councils of East Dean, Ellingham, Kimpton, MiHand, South Tedworth, Stoughton, West Dean, West Tytherley and Winterslow; and the Cholderton Parish Meeting. There were additional comments from various interested organisations and from residents of Hampshire and adjoining counties. BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE COUNTIES OF HAMPSHIRE AND DORSET: OUR DRAFT PROPOSALS a. Sopley Park 6. New Forest District Council in Hampshire recommended a small realignment of the boundary near Sopley Park, to follow the course of the River Avon and thereby place Sopley Park wholly in Hampshire. The Council maintained that Sopley Park's residents have their community of interest with Sopley in Hampshire. In addition, it suggested that a small area close to Sopley and south west of Sopley Park should be transferred from Hampshire to Dorset in order to eliminate the crossing of a short stretch of the River Avon by the present boundary in two places, which the Council considered to be administratively inconvenient. Both Dorset and Hampshire County Councils were in favour of the changes and we considered that the suggestions were sensible. We adopted them as our draft proposals, subject to minor adjustments suggested by Ordnance Survey. b. Bransaore 7. The boundary between New Forest District and Christchurch Borough in Dorset meanders north and south of the Bournemouth/Southampton railway line near Bransgore, and also divides properties in the area. We received four suggestions for changes to remedy the apparent anomalies. Dorset County Council recommended that the boundary be realigned to follow generally the south side of the railway line. Christchurch Borough Council recommended that the boundary should follow the railway line's north side. New Forest District Council, supported by Hampshire County Council, proposed that the boundary be moved to the south side of the railway line, and that about 28 properties in Ringwood Road, Beckley Copse and Plantation Drive be transferred to its district from the Borough of Christchurch. 8. The District Council said that all these properties looked either to it or to Hampshire County Council for services and that, in fact, it owned some of them. A local resident also suggested that the boundary should follow the south side of the railway line except in one area containing three houses with access only via Dorset. 9. We accepted that the existing boundary was unsatisfactory, particularly where property was divided. However, we considered that three of the four changes suggested would still leave anomalies in areas where the boundary crossed the railway. We concluded that it would be preferable to realign the boundary along the south side of the railway line in order to produce a clearer boundary along this entire section and we therefore adopted Dorset County Council's suggestion as our draft proposal, amended to reflect minor adjustments suggested by Ordnance Survey. c. Chewton Bunny 10. Dorset County Council, supported by Christchurch Borough Council, recommended the transfer of a small area in the Chewton Bunny Basin from New Forest District to the Borough of Christchurch, in order that maintenance of the Basin would become the responsibility of one authority. Hampshire County Council and New Forest District Council objected and favoured the existing boundary. 11. We found insufficient justification for the change as there was no evidence that the existing arrangements caused practical difficulties. However, we noted that a small part of the boundary was undefined and meandered across the Walkford Brook. To eliminate this anomaly we adopted as our draft proposal Ordnance Survey's suggestion that the boundary be realigned to follow the centre line of the Walkford Brook, with a further minor adjustment south of the Brook. d. Ringwood Forest 12. Dorset County Council, supported by East Dorset District Council, recommended the transfer of part of the B3081 which lies between Ebblake and Bakers Hanging, and land to the south west of it, from the Parish of Ellingham, Harbridge and Ibsley in New Forest District to East Dorset District. The County Council considered that the existing boundary did not follow any logical course related to physical features and that the whole of Ringwood Road, serving Verwood in Dorset, should be brought into that county. 13. Hampshire County Council, New Forest District Council, Ellingham Parish Council and a member of the public objected to the proposals. We could see no justification for them in terms of effective and convenient local government and no evidence to suggest that the present arrangements were unsatisfactory. However, we accepted Ordnance Survey's suggestion for a minor adjustment to remove a section of defaced boundary at Ebblake Bridge, and published it as our draft proposal. e. King Stream 14. New Forest District Council recommended realigning the county boundary to follow the course of the River Avon and thereby transfer a small area of water meadows from the Parish of St. Leonards and St. Ives (Dorset) to the Parish of Ringwood (Hampshire). It considered this would provide a better boundary in the area, the present boundary generally following the line of the River Avon. The County Councils of Dorset and Hampshire supported the suggestion and we accepted it, issuing a draft proposal accordingly. BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE COUNTIES OF HAMPSHIRE AND WEST SUSSEX: OUR DRAFT PROPOSALS f. The Mill Pond at Emsworth 15. Havant Borough Council recommended a boundary change west of the Mill Pond at Emsworth to transfer about twenty properties from Chichester District to the Borough. The Borough Council stated that the affected area was completely separated from West Sussex by a substantial stretch of water, thus making it a natural part of Hampshire. The Council also said that it already provided some local services to the'area. 16. Hampshire County Council did not oppose the proposal. West Sussex County Council and Chichester District Council both objected to it. We noted that the only access road to the southern part of the area passed through Hampshire and we were, therefore, minded to propose a change. However, rather than adopt Havant Borough Council's suggestion, we considered that the boundary should be realigned to follow the path along the embankment at the western side of the Mill Pond and, at its northern end, should place a property (a garage) in Hampshire before rejoining the existing boundary.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • [HA.NTS.] FA R 408 [POST OFFICB • O FARMERS Continued
    [HA.NTS.] FA R 408 [POST OFFICB • o FARMERS continued. tShotter Robert, Selborne, Alton, East Spencer William, Picket's hill, Stand- Rowland J. HartIeyWestpall, Winchfld Worldham ford, Headley, Petersfield Ruddle George, Kingsclere, Newbury Shrimpton G.Bishopstoke,Southampton Spicer William, Burley, Ringwood Ruddle H.(exors.of),Kingsclere,New bry ShrimptonJoho, Exton,Bishop'sWalthm Spier J ames, Binsted, Alton Ruddle WiHiam,Killgsclere,Woodlands, ShrimptonJ.jun.Exton,Bishop'sWalthm Spier William, Cliddesden, Basingstoke Newbury SHlence Mrs. C. Compton, Winchester Spratt George, CrondaIl, Farnham Ruttell Lawrence,Cove,Farnboro' station Sillence J ames,Otterbourne,Winchester Spratt J ames, Fritham, Lyndhurst Ruffell Lawrence, Elvetham,Winchfield Silvester Henry, Curbridge, Swanwick, Stacey C. T. Lyeway. Ropley, Alresford Ruffell Lawrence~iun.Hawley,Farnboro' Titchfield, Southampton Stacey Thomas, Pamber, Basingstoke Rumble George, Wallinl1:ton~ Fareham Silvester H. Upper'Lanham,OldAlresford Stadden John, Abbott'8 Ann, Andover Rumbold John, ItchingsweII, Newbury Silvester J. Slade, Froxfield, Petersfield Standfield Richard, Saltern's hill, Rumbold J oseph.. White house,Sydmon- Silvester Richard, New place, Soberton, Bealllieu, Southampton ton, Newbury Bishop's Waltham StandfieldW.J.Fording-bridge,SalisbllrJ- RumbollA.Church Oakley. Basingstoke Simmonds Geo. Mount Pleasant, Sway, Stanfield Joseph, Throop. Holden- RumboIl J.North Waltham,Micheldever Lymington hurst, Christchurch Rummery Joseph, West Minley, Farn- SimmonsJ. Weston, Freshwater, 1. ofW Standing Henry, Winsor, Southampton, borough station tSimpsonJ. Upper Froyle, Froyle, Alton Stanley George, Pamber, Basingstoke RummingJohn, Kingsclere,Woodlands, Sims Frauds, North Hayling, Havant Stares George, Hipley, Fareham Newlmry Sims Harry, North Hayling, Bavant Stares Henry,Bedenham farm, Fareham Rumsey George, Shipton Bellinger, Singleton George, Swanmore, Bishop's Stares Henry, Forest gate. Hambledon~ 1\'1arlborouO"h Waltham Horn Dean Rumsey Rt.
    [Show full text]
  • Make the Most of Your Stay
    Sopley Lake Bell Tent Camp Guide Make the most of your stay Directions To get to the bell tent camp, if you have Sat Nav enter the destination as Sopley and the name of the street as Derritt Lane, or the post code BH23 7AZ. Otherwise navigate to Sopley in Hampshire which is on the Ringwood to Christchurch road B3347. The camp is situated off Derritt Lane which runs from Sopley to Bransgore. If you are coming from Sopley as you head down Derritt Lane pass a crossing then look out on the right hand side for a five bar gate and our sign above. You will may see signs for Sopley Farm Shop Pick Your Own - this is the same location. If you are coming from Bransgore cross the single lane bridge and look for a five bar gate on the left hand side. You may also see signs for Sopley Farm Shop Pick Your Own - this is the same location. If the gate is locked, the combination is 1948 Drive past the Sopley Farm Shop on the left hand side and proceed on the tarmac road across the fields. Please take care, there maybe small children and pedestrians in this area. Continue straight ahead until you get to a metal 5 bar gate at the entrance to the wood if this is locked the code is the same, 1948 then you will get to the lake and follow the road round to the right. You will pass through the Fisherman’s Car Park. On a corner turn sharp left down the tree-lined track.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND at GRANBY GARDENS, LUDGERSHALL Transport Assessment
    LAND AT GRANBY GARDENS, LUDGERSHALL Transport Assessment 06/12/2012 Confidentiality: Public Quality Management Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Date 6th December 2012 Prepared by Grace Blizard Signature Checked by Stuart Morton Signature Authorised by Rhod Macleod Signature Project number 11790116 Report number File reference J:\11790116 - Granby Gardens - Ludgershall\TEXT\REPORTS\Transport Assessment (Nov2012)\Transport Assessment (181 dwellings) - Nov12.docx Project number: 11790116 Dated: 06/12/2012 2 | 53 Revised: LAND AT GRANBY GARDENS, LUDGERSHALL Transport Assessment 06/12/2012 Client Foreman Homes Group Unit 1 Station Industrial Park Duncan Road Park Gate Hampshire SO31 1BX Consultant WSP Group Limited Regus House Southampton SO18 2RZ UK Tel: +44 (0)23 8030 2529 Fax: +44 (0)23 8030 2001 www.wspgroup.co.uk Registered Address WSP UK Limited 01383511 WSP House, 70 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1AF WSP Contacts Rhod MacLeod 02380 302568 [email protected] Stuart Morton 02380 302556 [email protected] 3 | 53 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................... 5 2 Policy Context ........................................................................... 7 3 Existing Conditions.................................................................. 12 4 Accessibility ............................................................................ 22 5 Development Proposals .......................................................... 25 6 Development
    [Show full text]
  • Week Ending 12Th February 2010
    TEST VALLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL – PLANNING SERVICES _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WEEKLY LIST OF PLANNING APPLICATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS : NO. 06 Week Ending: 12th February 2010 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments on any of these matters should be forwarded IN WRITING (including fax and email) to arrive before the expiry date shown in the second to last column For the Northern Area to: For the Southern Area to: Head of Planning Head of Planning Beech Hurst Council Offices Weyhill Road Duttons Road ANDOVER SP10 3AJ ROMSEY SO51 8XG In accordance with the provisions of the Local Government (Access to Information Act) 1985, any representations received may be open to public inspection. You may view applications and submit comments on-line – go to www.testvalley.gov.uk APPLICATION NO./ PROPOSAL LOCATION APPLICANT CASE OFFICER/ PREVIOUS REGISTRATION PUBLICITY APPLICA- TIONS DATE EXPIRY DATE 10/00166/FULLN Erection of two replacement 33 And 34 Andover Road, Red Mr & Mrs S Brown Jnr Mrs Lucy Miranda YES 08.02.2010 dwellings together with Post Bridge, Andover, And Mr R Brown Page ABBOTTS ANN garaging and replacement Hampshire SP11 8BU 12.03.2010 and resiting of entrance gates 10/00248/VARN Variation of condition 21 of 11 Elder Crescent, Andover, Mr David Harman Miss Sarah Barter 10.02.2010 TVN.06928 - To allow garage Hampshire, SP10 3XY 05.03.2010 ABBOTTS ANN to be used for storage room
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE of POLL and SITUATION of POLLING STATIONS Election of a Police and Crime Commissioner for Hampshire Police Area Notice Is Hereby Given That: 1
    Police and Crime Commissioner Elections 2021 Police Area Returning Officer (PARO) Hampshire Police Area NOTICE OF POLL AND SITUATION OF POLLING STATIONS Election of a Police and Crime Commissioner for Hampshire Police Area Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of a Police and Crime Commissioner for Hampshire Police Area will be held on Thursday 6 May 2021, between the hours of 7:00am and 10:00pm. 2. The names, addresses and descriptions of the Candidates validly nominated for the election are as follows: Name of Candidate Address Description (if any) BUNDAY (address in Southampton, Itchen) Labour and Co-operative Party Tony JAMES-BAILEY (address in Brookvale & Kings Furlong, Basingstoke & Deane Hampshire Independents Steve Borough Council) JONES (address in Portsmouth North, Portsmouth City Council) Conservative Candidate - More Police, Safer Streets Donna MURPHY (address in St Paul ward, Winchester City Council) Liberal Democrats Richard Fintan 3. The situation of Polling Stations and the description of persons entitled to vote thereat are as follows: Station Description of persons entitled Situation of Polling Station Number to vote thereat 1 Colbury Memorial Hall, Main Road, Colbury AC-1 to AC-1767 2 Beaulieu Abbey Church Hall, Palace Lane, Beaulieu BA-1 to BA-651 6 Brockenhurst Village Hall, Highwood Road, Brockenhurst BK-1 to BK-1656 7 Brockenhurst Village Hall, Highwood Road, Brockenhurst BL-1 to BL-1139 8 St Johns Church Hall, St Johns Road, Bashley BM-2 to BM-122 8 St Johns Church Hall, St Johns Road, Bashley
    [Show full text]
  • Pottery Farm
    POTTERY FARM OVER WALLOP, NR STOCKBRIDGE, HAMPSHIRE Rare Residential Agricultural/ Equestrian Smallholding With A Range Of Outbuildings SITUATION Grateley 1½ miles, A303 (London/West Country) 4½ miles, Pottery Farm, Over Wallop, Hampshire SO20 8HU Stockbridge 8 miles, Andover 10 miles, Salisbury 13 miles, Mainline train station: Grateley to London/Waterloo 90 mins Approximate Gross External Area :- 183 sq m / 1973 sq ft International airport: Southampton 24 miles, Approximate Gross Internal Area :- 164 sq m / 1763 sq ft Bournemouth International airport 37 miles N Pottery Farm is located on Station Road in the heart of the village E Study Utility connecting with nearby trunk roads leading to Salisbury, Romsey and Dining Room W 2.97 x 2.87 Kitchen 3.18 x 3.18 Andover. Grateley with mainline train services into London is in the 3.36 x 2.97 3.08 x 2.95 S 9'9 x 9'5 10'5 x 10'5 next village. There are excellent communication links via the A303 to 11'0 x 9'9 10'1 x 9'8 B the north, connecting to London and the West Country. The Cathedral T City of Winchester lies to the south east, with Southampton to the south. Education There are well known public schools in the area including Rookwood and Farleigh at Andover, Norman Court at West Tytherley, Breakfast Room Bedroom 4 3.65 x 3.02 3.73 x 2.37 Pilgrims’, St Swithun’s, Twyford and Winchester to the south east; Sitting Room 12'0 x 9'11 12'3 x 7'9 Chafyn Grove, Godolphin, Leehurst Swan, Leaden Hall and Cathedral 6.32 x 5.55 20'9 x 18'3 School in Salisbury (see www.iscis-sw.co.uk).
    [Show full text]
  • Longparish Cemetery
    Cemetery analysis Graves located on Cemetery extension map NOTE: Due to earlier formatting it looks like many of the dates have automatically become the first of the month Reservations Born Burial Grave Burial Grant Burial Grant Grave Reservation Notice of Certificate Fee for Application Fee for Date of death Date of Burial Surname Forenames Occupation Abode Age (calculated) Register xl cemetery map number from paperwork Number Date completed number fee In accounts Undertaker interment burial/cremation burial In accounts for memorial Stonemason memorial in accounts Inscription Notes 21/06/1905 Taylor Dorothy 86 1819 No 29/03/1932 Sawyer Susan Longparish 45 1887 513 02/04/1932 Newell Fanny Longparish 85 1847 516 04/05/1932 Smith George Longparish 36 1896 515 04/05/1932 Guyatt Jane Wherwell 76 1856 514 13/05/1932 Cockcraft Albert Red Roofs, Longparish 59 1873 517 02/06/1932 Ralph Sarah Longparish 77 1855 518 11/06/1932 Malt Eliza Forton, Longparish 77 1855 519 19 09/03/31 19 15/08/1932 Tubbs Walter Charles Owls Lodge, Longparish 59 1873 520 22/08/1932 White Dorothy Eileen Longparish 5 1927 521 01/12/1932 Brackstone Alice Longparish 67 1865 522 05/12/1932 Harmer George William Tree Tops, Wherwell 77 1855 523 16/01/1933 Alexander Jane District Villas, Longparish 50 1883 524 18/01/1933 Mason Arthur Firgrove, Longparish 37 1896 525 23/01/1933 Ball Ellen Longparish 81 1852 526 27/03/1933 Walker stillborn child of Stanley & Edith Longparish 0 1933 527 29/04/1933 Sweatman Jemima Fox Farm, Longparish 90 1843 529 5 07/10/25 6 29/04/1933 Carter Joseph
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Services
    TEST VALLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL – PLANNING SERVICES _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WEEKLY LIST OF PLANNING APPLICATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS : NO. 20 Week Ending: 19th May 2006 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments on any of these matters should be forwarded IN WRITING (including fax and email) to arrive before the expiry date shown in the second to last column For the Northern Area to: For the Southern Area to: Head of Planning Head of Planning Beech Hurst Council Offices Weyhill Road Duttons Road ANDOVER SP10 3AJ ROMSEY SO51 8XG In accordance with the provisions of the Local Government (Access to Information Act) 1985, any representations received may be open to public inspection. You may view applications and submit comments on-line – go to www.testvalley.gov.uk APPLICATION NO./ PROPOSAL LOCATION APPLICANT CASE OFFICER/ PREVIOUS REGISTRATION PUBLICITY APPLICA- TIONS DATE EXPIRY DATE 06/01471/FULLN Conversion and change of Manor Farm, Monxton Road, Lady Boughey Trust Mr Nicholas Parker YES 19.05.2006 use from agricultural to office Abbotts Ann ABBOTTS ANN Fund 16.06.2006 (Class B1a) light industry (Class B1c) and storage and distribution (Class B8) together with associated works 06/01484/FULLN Conversion of garage to one Osmaston, Salisbury Road, David Kitson Mrs Lucy Miranda YES 18.05.2006 bedroom granny annex Abbotts Ann ABBOTTS ANN Page 16.06.2006 06/01541/FULLN Erection of two 3 Abbotts Close, Abbotts Ann, Mr And Mrs Seabrook Miss Emily Hayward YES 18.05.2006 conservatories at side and Andover ABBOTTS ANN 16.06.2006 rear elevations 06/01550/TREEN T11, T12, T13, T14, T16, Rectory Cottage, Clatford Mr George Hutchinson Mr Andrew Douglas YES 18.05.2006 T24 crown reduce.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Services
    TEST VALLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL – PLANNING SERVICES _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WEEKLY LIST OF PLANNING APPLICATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS : NO. 27 Week Ending: 6th July 2018 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments on any of these matters should be forwarded IN WRITING (including fax and email) to arrive before the expiry date shown in the second to last column Head of Planning and Building Beech Hurst Weyhill Road ANDOVER SP10 3AJ In accordance with the provisions of the Local Government (Access to Information Act) 1985, any representations received may be open to public inspection. You may view applications and submit comments on-line – go to www.testvalley.gov.uk APPLICATION NO./ PROPOSAL LOCATION APPLICANT CASE OFFICER/ PREVIOUS REGISTRATION PUBLICITY APPLICA- TIONS DATE EXPIRY DATE 18/01508/FULLN Erection of a single storey 119 Harrow Way, Andover, Mr J Valiaveettil Mrs Donna Dodd 02.07.2018 front extension to provide Hampshire, SP10 3DY Chacko 27.07.2018 ANDOVER TOWN dining room and w.c. (HARROWAY) 18/01695/FULLN Retrospective application - 1B Mylen Road, Andover, Mr Choudhry Mrs Samantha 04.07.2018 revised extraction system SP10 3HJ, Owen ANDOVER TOWN layout for odour control 30.07.2018 (HARROWAY) 18/01330/FULLN Change of use of open land 22 Caesar Close, Andover, Mrs Rachel Harper Mr Luke Benjamin 05.07.2018 to garden and erection of a SP10 5JR, 01.08.2018 ANDOVER TOWN fence (retrospective)
    [Show full text]
  • 125 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    125 bus time schedule & line map 125 Ringwood - Christchurch View In Website Mode The 125 bus line (Ringwood - Christchurch) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Christchurch: 10:00 AM - 1:00 PM (2) Ringwood: 9:19 AM - 2:00 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 125 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 125 bus arriving. Direction: Christchurch 125 bus Time Schedule 38 stops Christchurch Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 10:00 AM - 1:00 PM Meeting House Lane, Ringwood Tuesday Not Operational Carvers Park, Ringwood Wednesday 10:00 AM - 1:00 PM Fieldway, Poulner Thursday Not Operational White Hart, Poulner Friday 10:00 AM - 1:00 PM Coach Hill Lane, Burley Street Saturday Not Operational Burley Coach House, Burley The Mall, Burley Civil Parish Copse Road, Burley 125 bus Info Direction: Christchurch Castle Hill Lane, Burley Stops: 38 Trip Duration: 57 min Chubbs Farm, Burley Line Summary: Meeting House Lane, Ringwood, Carvers Park, Ringwood, Fieldway, Poulner, White Hart, Poulner, Coach Hill Lane, Burley Street, Burley Thorney Hill Crossroads, Thorney Hill Coach House, Burley, Copse Road, Burley, Castle Hill Lane, Burley, Chubbs Farm, Burley, Thorney Hill School Road, Thorney Hill Crossroads, Thorney Hill, School Road, Thorney Hill, Willow Lane, Thorney Hill, Walkers Garage, Thorney Willow Lane, Thorney Hill Hill, Wedgewood Gardens, Bransgore, Bransgore Gardens, Bransgore, Ringwood Road, Bransgore, Walkers Garage, Thorney Hill Carpenters Arms, Bransgore, Bockhampton
    [Show full text]
  • Needs Analysis for Wiltshire and Swindon
    Needs Analysis for Wiltshire and Swindon January 2021 Contents Population profile ..................................................................................................... 4 Deprivation ............................................................................................................. 19 Economy ................................................................................................................. 42 Education, skills and training ................................................................................. 49 Health, wellbeing and disability ........................................................................... 64 Housing ................................................................................................................... 82 Children and young people ................................................................................. 91 Older people ........................................................................................................ 114 Community strength ............................................................................................ 125 Accessibility and isolation ................................................................................... 137 Covid-19 ................................................................................................................ 150 Appendix A – Indicators used in this report ....................................................... 167 2 Needs Analysis for Wiltshire and Swindon 2021 Introduction This report,
    [Show full text]
  • 1891 Census Transcription Barton Stacey Parish RG12 Piece 962, Folios 18-28 (Covering 21 Pages of Census Images)
    1891 Census for Barton Stacey Parish. 1 Please report errors and additional information Transcribed by Anne Harrison. Copyright Barton Stacey Parish Local History Group, 2013. to [email protected] 1891 census transcription Barton Stacey parish RG12 Piece 962, folios 18-28 (covering 21 pages of census images). HD head of household, WI wife, S son, D daughter, StepD step-daughter, BR brother, SI sister, GS/GD grandson/daughter, GF/GM grandfather/mother, FA father, MO mother, NI niece, NE nephew, AU aunt, UN uncle, SL/DL/BL/SiL/FL/ML/ son/ daughter/ brother/ sister/ father/ mother-in-law. SE servant, BO boarder, LO lodger, VI visitor, HK housekeeper. M married, S single, W widow(er). Note: we have transcribed as faithfully as possible the original writing of the enumerator. Sometimes this has been difficult and where there is any doubt we have made this clear. Note that the areas of the parish (column 2) are added from our knowledge of the parish Sch Area of parish Address Forename(s) Surname Rel'p Marital Age Occupation Employer, County of Town of birth Notes added by the Barton Stacey Parish Local History edul This was sometimes to Status in employed or birth Group e abbreviated by the HD 1891 neither [box enumerator to fit it into left blank = none of these. the alloted space. 1 Barton Stacey Manor Farm H. John P. WILTSHIRE HD M 27 Farm Bailiff employed Wilts. Chippenham 1 Sarah M. WILTSHIRE WI M 37 Hants. Barton Stacey 1 John B. WILTSHIRE S 2 Hants. Barton Stacey 1 Ethel M.
    [Show full text]