TEXAS PEACOCK BASS and NILE PERCH: STATUS REPORT by WILLIAM P
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fishing Gear in the Sondu-Miriu River: Level of Use, Preference and Selectivity Waswala-Olewe M
Fishing Gear in the Sondu-Miriu River: Level of Use, Preference and Selectivity Waswala-Olewe M. Brian, Okot-Okumu James and Abila O. Richard Waswala- Olewe M. Brian Okumu James Abila o. Richard Abstract: Artisan fishers of Osodo beach of Sondu-Miriu River (Kenya) use both traditional and modern gear to catch riverine fish species. This study, conducted between August 2006 and July 2007, revealed that fishers most predominantly used gear were the seine nets (42%) and the gill nets (28%). Other used gear include long lines (14%); fish baskets (9%) and weirs (7%). The selectivity of this fishing gear varied with the developmental stages of the fish to be caught. Non- selective gear caught both targeted and non-targeted species irrespective of size and development stages. The ranking of selective to non-selective fishing gear was the long lines, fish baskets, weirs, gill nets and beach nets at 2%, 11%, 16%, 24% and 32%, respectively. The non-selective fishing gear may have negative impacts on the riverine fish by reducing spawning biomass and lacustrine fish recruitment. These findings underscore the need for greater appreciation, research, and adaptation of appropriate fishing gear to ensure sustainable utilization of the riverine fisheries in Sondu-Miriu River. Key words: Sondu-Miriu River, Osodo beach, riverine fish, lacustrine fish, fishing gear Introduction Nile Perch (Lates nilotica) (Ogutu-Ohwayo & Balirwa ish plays an important role in both the aquatic 2006). Fecosystem and to the human population. They are Rivers are crucial breeding and nursery grounds for good indicators of environmental health within rivers the riverine fish species which later repopulate the lakes. -
Lates Niloticus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nile Perch (Lates niloticus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary Web Version – September 2014 Photo: © Biopix: N Sloth 1 Native Range, and Status in the United States Native Range From Schofield (2011): “Much of central, western and eastern Africa: Nile River (below Murchison Falls), as well as the Congo, Niger, Volga, Senegal rivers and lakes Chad and Turkana (Greenwood 1966 [cited by Schofield (2011) but not accessed for this report]). Also present in the brackish Lake Mariot near Alexandria, Egypt.” Lates niloticus Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Web Version - 8/14/2012 Status in the United States From Schofield (2011): “Scientists from Texas traveled to Tanzania in 1974-1975 to investigate the introduction potential of Lates spp. into Texas reservoirs (Thompson et al. 1977 [cited by Schofield (2011) but not accessed for this report]). Temperature tolerance and trophic dynamics were studied for three species (L. angustifrons, L. microlepis and L. mariae). Subsequently, several individuals of these three species were shipped to Heart of the Hills Research Station (HOHRS) in Ingram, Texas in 1975 (Rutledge and Lyons 1976 [cited by Schofield (2011) but not accessed for this report]). Also in 1975, Nile perch (L. niloticus) were transferred from Lake Turkana, Kenya, to HOHRS. All fishes were held in indoor, closed-circulating systems (Rutledge and Lyons 1976).” “From 1978 to 1985, Lates spp. was released into various Texas reservoirs (Howells and Garrett 1992 [cited by Schofield (2011) but not accessed for this report]). Almost 70,000 Lates spp. larvae were stocked into Victor Braunig (Bexar Co.), Coleto Creek (Goliad Co.) and Fairfield (Freestone Co.) reservoirs between 1978 and 1984. -
Barramundi – the Next Big Global Marine Finfish
Barramundi – the next big global marine finfish Dean Jerry Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture James Cook University Australia Presentation outline . Global changes in food commodity consumption . Barramundi as the gap filler . Biological attributes of barramundi . Broodstock management . Hatchery production . Challenges to farming . Potential in Brazil Changing populations with changing diets 27% Cereals 58% 28% Fruit and vegetables 18% Sugars and 30% alcohol Meat, fish 27% 6% and other 7% products Developing Developed Changing populations with changing diets 27% Cereals 58% 28% Fruit and vegetables 18% Sugars and 30% alcohol Meat, fish 27% 6% and other 7% products Developing Developed Changing populations with changing diets The portfolio gap The portfolio gap What is barramundi? Species: Lates calcarifer Snooks (Americas) Nile perch (Africa) Centropomus sp. Lates niloticus Distribution of barramundi/seabass Australia vs SEAsiaBarramundi vs Australia Australia Indonesia - KM Indonesia - SW SE Asia SE Vietnam Cambodia Philippines Catadromous and protandrous life-history Catadromous - live in fresh water but migrate to marine waters to breed Protandrous Hermaphodite – born males and change sex into females later in life Attractiveness for farming Euryhaline (wide salinity tolerance): Cultured in fresh, brackish or seawater Fast growth: 1 kg in 1 year Accept well artificial food: wean onto pellets early, specialised diets available Good Feed Conversion Ratio FCR = < 1.5 :1 (Kg feed : Kg fish) Hardy: up to 100 kg / m3, 50t/ha Food conversion efficiency Strong consumer preference Versatility of farming systems Freshwater/brackish ponds Sea Cages Intensive raceways RAS Production Statistics - Global Production Statistics - Australia Production Statistics - Australia Broodstock management . Require saltwater (28-35ppt) for final gonadal maturation . -
Royal Peacock Bass (Cichla Intermedia) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
Royal Peacock Bass (Cichla intermedia) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, August 2011 Revised, May 2018 Web Version, 9/7/2018 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2018): “South America: Orinoco River basin, tributaries of the Orinoco River, and the Casiquiare River in Venezuela. Probably occurs in Colombia.” Status in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. This species is present in the aquarium trade in the United States, for example: From Bluegrass Aquatics (2018): “Intermedia Peacock Bass Cichlid REGULAR $232.48” “Intermedia Peacock Bass Cichlid REGULAR Cichla Intermedia Known as the "Royal" peacock by American anglers.” 1 Means of Introductions in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS (2018): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Actinopterygii Class Teleostei Superorder Acanthopterygii Order Perciformes Suborder Labroidei Family Cichlidae Genus Cichla Species Cichla intermedia Machado-Allison, 1971” “Taxonomic Status: Current Standing: valid” Size, Weight, and Age Range From Froese and Pauly (2018): “[…] range 28 - ? cm Max length: 55.0 cm TL male/unsexed; [IGFA 2001]; max. published weight: 3,000 g [IGFA 2001].” Environment From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Freshwater; benthopelagic.” Climate/Range From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Tropical” 2 Distribution Outside the United States Native From Froese and Pauly (2018): “South America: Orinoco River basin, tributaries of the Orinoco River, and the Casiquiare River in Venezuela. -
Release Recreational Angling to Effectively Conserve Diverse Fishery
Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 1195–1209, 2005. Ó Springer 2005 DOI 10.1007/s10531-004-7845-0 Do we need species-specific guidelines for catch-and- release recreational angling to effectively conserve diverse fishery resources? STEVEN J. COOKE1,* and CORY D. SUSKI2 1Department of Forest Sciences, Centre for Applied Conservation Research, University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4; 2Department of Biology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6; *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Received 2 April 2003; accepted in revised form 12 January 2004 Key words: Catch-and-release, Fisheries conservation, Hooking mortality, Recreational angling, Sustainable fisheries Abstract. Catch-and-release recreational angling has become very popular as a conservation strategy and as a fisheries management tool for a diverse array of fishes. Implicit in catch-and-release angling strategies is the assumption that fish experience low mortality and minimal sub-lethal effects. Despite the importance of this premise, research on this topic has focused on several popular North American sportfish, with negligible efforts directed towards understanding catch-and-release angling effects on alternative fish species. Here, we summarise the existing literature to develop five general trends that could be adopted for species for which no data are currently available: (1) minimise angling duration, (2) minimise air ex- posure, (3) avoid angling during extremes in water temperature, (4) use barbless hooks and artificial lures=flies, and (5) refrain from angling fish during the reproductive period. These generalities provide some level of protection to all species, but do have limitations. Therefore, we argue that a goal of conservation science and fisheries management should be the creation of species-specific guidelines for catch-and-release. -
Freshwater Fish of New River, Belize
FRESHWATER FISH OF NEW RIVER, BELIZE Belize is home to an abundant diversity of freshwater Blue Tilapia fish species and is often considered a fisherman’s Oreochromis aureus, Tilapia paradise. The New River area is a popular freshwater Adult size: 13–20 cm (5–8 in) fishing destination in the Orange Walk district of northern Belize. Here locals and visitors alike take to the lagoons and waterways for dinner or for good sportfishing. This guide highlights the most popular species in the area and will help people identify and understand these species. A fishing license is required for all fishers, so before casting be sure to check the local laws and regulations. Tarpon Victor Atkins Megalops atlanticus This edible, fleshy fish can be identified by its overall blue Adult size: 1-2.5 m (4-8 ft) color. Adults can weigh up to 2.7kg (6 lbs). This exotic cichlid is abundant in both fresh and brackish waters. Mayan Cichlid Cichlasoma urophthalmus, Pinta Adult size: 25–27 cm (10–11 in) Albert Kok Tarpon are large fish that can weigh up to 127kg (280 lbs). They are covered in large, silver scales and have no spines in their fins, and have a broad mouth with a prominent lower jaw. Tarpon are fighters and may jump out of the water DATZ. R. Stawikowski several times when hooked. They are found in fresh and saltwater. This popular food fish has dark vertical bars and a large black eyespot with a blue border at the tail base. The first Bay Snook dorsal and anal fins have many sharp spines. -
Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................ -
Florida Fishing Regulations
2009–2010 Valid from July 1, 2009 FLORIDA through June 30, 2010 Fishing Regulations Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FRESHWATER EDITION MyFWC.com/Fishing Tips from the Pros page 6 Contents Web Site: MyFWC.com Visit MyFWC.com/Fishing for up-to- date information on fishing, boating and how to help ensure safe, sus- tainable fisheries for the future. Fishing Capital North American Model of of the World—Welcome .........................2 Wildlife Conservation ........................... 17 Fish and wildlife alert reward program Florida Bass Conservation Center ............3 General regulations for fish management areas .............................18 Report fishing, boating or hunting Introduction .............................................4 law violations by calling toll-free FWC contact information & regional map Get Outdoors Florida! .............................19 1-888-404-FWCC (3922); on cell phones, dial *FWC or #FWC Freshwater fishing tips Specific fish management depending on service carrier; or from the pros..................................... 6–7 area regulations ............................18–24 report violations online at Northwest Region MyFWC.com/Law. Fishing license requirements & fees .........8 North Central Region Resident fishing licenses Northeast Region Nonresident fishing licenses Southwest Region Lifetime and 5-year licenses South Region Freshwater license exemptions Angler’s Code of Ethics ..........................24 Methods of taking freshwater fish ..........10 Instant “Big Catch” Angler Recognition -
Color Pattern Variation in Cichla Temensis (Perciformes: Cichlidae): Resolution Based on Morphological, Molecular, and Reproductive Data
Neotropical Ichthyology, 10(1): 59-70, 2012 Copyright © 2012 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia Color pattern variation in Cichla temensis (Perciformes: Cichlidae): Resolution based on morphological, molecular, and reproductive data Paul Reiss1, Kenneth W. Able2, Mario S. Nunes3 and Tomas Hrbek3 Morphological variants of Cichla temensis, readily differentiated by their striking color pattern differences, are found in several Amazon basin flood pulse river systems. The adult variants have at times been thought to represent different species or sexual dimorphism. A three part study was performed in two regions in Brazil (rio Igapó Açú and rio Caures) to elucidate the nature of the variants. In part one; selected diagnostic morphometric characters were compared intraspecifically among the variants and interspecifically with C. monoculus and C. orinocensis. All of the C. temensis variants were found to differ significantly from their sympatric congeners while not differing among each other. In part two, mitochondrial DNA samples were compared intraspecifically among the variants and interspecifically with their sympatric congeners. There were no diagnostic molecular synapomorphies that would unambiguously distinguish the variants and all C. temensis variants were clearly diagnosable and divergent from their sympatric congeners. In part three, color pattern variation in both sexes was compared to a gonadosomatic index (GSI). A significant correlation between color pattern variation and gonadosomatic index was found. The results of this study demonstrate that Cichla temensis variants are confirmed to be members of a single species and that the variation does not represent a sexual dimorphism. The color pattern variation is a cyclically occurring secondary sexual characteristic and is indicative of the specific degree of an individual’s seasonal sexual maturation. -
Pdf (740.35 K)
Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology & Fisheries Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. ISSN 1110 – 6131 Vol. 24(3): 311 – 322 (2020) www.ejabf.journals.ekb.eg Origin of Invasive Fish Species, Peacock Bass Cichla Species in Lake Telabak Malaysia Revealed by Mitochondrial DNA Barcoding Aliyu G. Khaleel1,2, Syafiq A. M. Nasir1, Norshida Ismail1, 1, and Kamarudin Ahmad-Syazni * 1 School of Animal Science, Faculty of Bioresources and Food Industry, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Besut Campus, 22200 Besut, Terengganu, Malaysia. 2 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Agricultural Technology, Kano University of Science and Technology, Wudil, P.M.B. 3244 Kano State, Nigeria. *Corresponding author: [email protected] ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History: Peacock bass (Perciformes, Cichlidae, Cichla) are multi-coloured and Received: Nov. 18, 2019 highly predatory fish originated from Amazonian region. The species was Accepted: April 27, 2020 deliberately introduced into Malaysia freshwater bodies by anglers in the early Online: May 2020 1990’s for sport fisheries. In this recent study, we found the population of _______________ peacock bass in Lake Telabak, a man-made lake in Besut, Terengganu. Using mitochondrial DNA analysis approach, the origin and taxonomy of peacock Keywords: bass in the lake were clarify. A total of forty fishes were sampled from Lake Peacock bass, Telabak for the analysis. Haplotype was detected among all samples. The Invasive species, current study revealed that Cichla spp. in Lake Telabak are closer to Cichla mitochondrial DNA ocellaris (Bloch and Schneider, 1801) with a sequence similarity of 99.72% barcoding, Lake Telabak as blasted at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. -
Introduced-Fish Studies in Southern Florida Natural Areas
Introduced-Fish Studies in Southern Florida Natural Areas William F. Loftus USGS-Florida Integrated Science Center Everglades National Park Field Station Homestead, FL Collaborators NPS • Jeff Kline – Everglades N.P. University • Joel Trexler; Tim Collins - FIU NGO • Jerry Lorenz; Jenn Rehage; Krissy Dunker – National Audubon Society USGS • Leo Nico; Shawn Smith – Florida Integrated Science Center ____________________ FUNDING: NPS, USGS, US FWS, ACOE ISSUE: Dozens of Tropical Freshwater Fishes Have been Introduced into South Florida What are they? How did they arrive here? What are their effects? Why are they successful here? Can anything be done about them? Introduced Fishes in South FL 31 introduced species reproducing in Florida's waters (Shafland 2002); most are freshwater. Most are from tropical Asia, South America, and Africa. Native freshwater fishes originate from temperate North America (35 spp.). 15 introduced species in So. FL natural areas; most in family Cichlidae. Major Sources of Introductions •Planned Introductions •Food-fish Introductions Photo Credit: Leonard Lovshin •Illegal or Accidental Introductions •Unknown Source Howard Jelks Inventory and Monitoring Studies Sampling Methods Throw Trap Minnow Trap Electrofishing Visual Throw-trap ( ) & Drift- fence ( ) sampling sites. Jewel cichlid 2001 Jaguar cichlid Jewel cichlid 2004 Jaguar cichlid Temporal Colonizations of the Everglades Region 1960s: Black acara. 1970s: Oscar, walking catfish, spotted tilapia, blue tilapia. Mid-1980s: Mayan cichlid, pike killifish, peacock bass, Mozambique tilapia. Late 90s-00s: Jewel cichlid, jaguar cichlid, brown hoplo, banded cichlid, spotfinned spiny eel. First-record Locations in ENP Acara Jewel Cichla Clarias Heros Jaguar Hoplo Tilapia PikeSpinyeel Mayan Drift-fence – 2000 Throw traps-1996-2001 % introduced/total % introduced/total # introduced species Edge Areas 0.24 Interior 10 0.7 0.04 4 2 0.7 10 2 4 7 4 3 3 6 2 Taylor 0.38 Canals are sites of introduction, dispersal, and refuge for non-indigenous biota C. -
NILE PERCH Biodiversity As a Spinoff of Btb Control Will Then Be Lost
of problem organisms is refl ected in the effort of commu- Atkinson, I. A. E., and E. K. Cameron. 1993. Human infl uence on the nity groups working on private and public lands to remove terrestrial biota and biotic communities of New Zealand. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12: 447–451. pests and weeds and to restore and replant native species. Fukami, T., D. A. Wardle, P. J. Bellingham, C. P. H. Mulder, D. R. Towns, However, this more aggressive stand toward invasive spe- G. W. Yeates, K. I. Bonner, M. S. Durrett, M. N. Grant-Hoffman, cies, especially mammals, can lead to polarized attitudes and W. M. Williamson. 2006. Above- and below-ground impacts of introduced predators in seabird-dominated island ecosystems. Ecology within local communities. For example, the control of Letters 9: 1299–1307. possums and associated by-kill of deer spawned a coor- Hosking, G., J. Clearwater, J. Handisides, M. Kay, J. Ray, and N. Simmons. dinated campaign against compound 1080 and the agen- 2003. Tussock moth eradication: A success story from New Zealand. International Journal of Pest Management 49: 17–24. cies that use it; this has even included threats to sabotage King, C. M., ed. 2005. The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals, 2nd ed. conservation sites through the deliberate release of pests. Melbourne: Oxford University Press. Furthermore, within Auckland, attitudes to the spread of McDowall, R. M. 1994. Gamekeepers for the Nation: The Story of Btk against introduced moths differed between suburbs, New Zealand’s Acclimatisation Societies, 1861–1990. Christchurch: Canterbury University Press. with orchestrated campaigns of resistance to its use in west- Montague, T.