Video on Demand Attitudes & Opportunities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Video on Demand Attitudes & Opportunities Video on Demand Attitudes & Opportunities A consumer study by: E-Poll Market Research January 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 METHODOLOGY....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 DETAILED FINDINGS................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 VOD Consumer Segments.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Awareness and Interest ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Future Intent and Pricing ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 17 VOD Usage....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 User Experience ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 Usage of Entertainment-Related Services........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 37 TV Viewing Habits ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 47 Cable Service................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 49 CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 ABOUT E-POLL® MARKET RESEARCH....................................................................................................................................................................................... 53 2 INTRODUCTION As 2006 unfolds, the promise of VOD as the next big thing in media consumption seems to still be just that, a promise. Networks are cautiously beginning to test the VOD waters with some of their Prime Time programs. However, key stakeholders, including the networks, their affiliates, advertisers, media buyers, and cable operators naturally want to ensure VOD serves their needs before making a financial or strategic commitment. In addition to serving these stakeholders, we need to look at the most salient factor in the success of VOD, the viewer. Consumers have numerous choices for the delivery of movies, TV programs and special event programming. Currently, many view VOD as a “last resort” when choosing their television for entertainment. The purpose of this E-Poll survey is to address the critical issues for VOD’s success from the consumers’ perspective. To support the promise of VOD, we address the following questions: What do viewers want to watch on VOD? Which pricing model is preferred by viewers? How can advertising be effectively integrated into VOD? How do non-users perceive VOD? What VOD features are most appealing? How VOD can be more competitive with the DVR? This study is essential for advertisers, cable operators, content providers and other key stakeholders looking to: Bring VOD more top of mind with current users Identify a revenue model and long term strategy to fuel the growth of VOD 3 METHODOLOGY A random sample of 2,109 consumers with cable TV service was recruited from E-Poll’s nationally representative panel and asked about their awareness, perceptions and usage of VOD. The respondents naturally segmented themselves into four groups: 1. Don't have VOD but are aware 2. Have VOD but never used 3. Have VOD and have used it but don’t currently 4. Currently use VOD They were screened for gender (about half men and half women) and age (13-49 years). The survey was conducted October 2005 with a follow up survey conducted December 2005. A sample size of 2109 yields a margin of error of +-2.4% at a 95% level of confidence. Subsample data are more sensitive to sampling error. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Current Status of On Demand Video on Demand is still in the early stages of development. The technology continues to evolve and service offerings are expanding. While awareness of the service is high (91%), non-user familiarity and interest are low. Usage is also low (20% of those surveyed), and those who do use VOD have not significantly increased their usage of the service since initial trial. The VOD service is primarily used to watch movies at a convenient time. Its other primary use is as a last resort when there is nothing else on TV. It is simply not viewed as the go-to source for TV or other types of entertainment. When consumers first turn on their TV sets, VOD is not a first stop for current VOD users, nor would it be for non-users if they had access. Contrast this with the interactive program guide (IPG), which has become a must-have for many consumers. More respondents mention the IPG than all other options as the first place they go when they turn on their TV set. In addition, although VOD is seen primarily as a vehicle for movies, VOD users perceive the selection of movies and programs as limited. Current VOD Customers Current VOD customers are relatively satisfied with the service. However, those who also own a DVR are significantly more likely to prefer their DVR. This is primarily due to content availability and convenience. With a DVR, respondents can record their favorite TV programs and watch them at any time. VOD is perceived as less flexible than using a DVR. This limited flexibility stems from having to choose from a narrow list of programming options, combined with a limited amount of time to view the programs. Although current VOD customers engage in other types of entertainment about as often as non-users, their purchase/rental of DVD and VHS movies has decreased since they obtained their VOD service. In addition, they are significantly more likely than non-users to subscribe to premium movie channels. However, current VOD users are most likely “early adopters” so their opinions may differ from those of future VOD users as the service diffuses through the general population. Target Market The key target demographic for VOD appears to be young males. However, while this segment expresses higher awareness of and interest in VOD offerings, the older male and female portions of the audience, while not the strongest segments today, may offer a more stable growth opportunity due to the unpredictable nature of the young male segment. Consumers without access to VOD are more interested than the other non-user groups in the various features and benefits of VOD. However, not having digital cable is a major drawback for them, and they are not willing to pay extra for this service. VOD Features and Pricing The most popular types of potential programming for VOD are recent release movies and this season’s Prime Time TV programs. When these options are incorporated into the On Demand service, the appeal of the service will most likely increase. The VOD feature that elicits the greatest level of interest is free programming. Two-thirds of the respondents (87% of the current users) are very interested in this feature, and more current users have taken advantage of free programming than any other VOD offering. The major objection to VOD among non-users is the perceived cost. Most non-users think the cost is very high (almost $5.00 per program or a $22 per month incremental average cost), but in reality, many VOD programs are free. This perception of cost presents a significant hurdle for VOD content providers and operators to overcome. 5 In the study, consumers were presented with three theoretical “pricing” options: (1) a per-item fee ($.99 or $1.99), (2) a monthly fee ($10 or $15) or (3) free programs, but with advertising preceding the programs. They were asked to select their preferred option. In all variations, the free program preceded
Recommended publications
  • Tuning Into the On-Demand Streaming Culture—Hollywood Guilds’ Evolution Imperative in Today’S Media Landscape
    UCLA UCLA Entertainment Law Review Title Tuning Into the On-Demand Streaming Culture—Hollywood Guilds’ Evolution Imperative in Today’s Media Landscape Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2152q2t4 Journal UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 27(1) ISSN 1073-2896 Author Roth, Blaine Publication Date 2020 DOI 10.5070/LR8271048856 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California TUNING INTO THE ON-DEMAND STREAMING CULTURE— Hollywood Guilds’ Evolution Imperative in Today’s Media Landscape Blaine Roth Abstract Hollywood television and film production has largely been unionized since the early 1930s. Today, due in part to technological advances, the industry is much more expansive than it has ever been, yet the Hollywood unions, known as “guilds,” have arguably not evolved at a similar pace. Although the guilds have adapted to the needs of their members in many aspects, have they suc- cessfully adapted to the evolving Hollywood business model? This Comment puts a focus on the Writers Guild of America, Directors Guild of America, and the Screen Actors Guild, known as SAG-AFTRA following its merger in 2012, and asks whether their respective collective bargaining agreements are out-of- step with the evolution of the industry over the past ten years, particularly in the areas of new media and the direct-to-consumer model. While analyzing the guilds in the context of the industry environment as it is today, this Com- ment contends that as the guilds continue to feel more pronounced effects from the evolving media landscape, they will need to adapt at a much more rapid pace than ever before in order to meet the needs of their members.
    [Show full text]
  • DEG Guide June 2020 Digital Entertainment Definitions Electronic Sell-Through (EST) – Refers to Digital Titles Priced for Sale
    DEG Guide June 2020 Digital Entertainment Definitions Electronic Sell-through (EST) – Refers to digital titles priced for sale to consumers. Once a title is purchased, the consumer has the right to watch the title as many times as they like, on various devices. Video-on-Demand – Refers to digital titles priced for rental, with consumers’ paying for access to content for a limited term. • TVOD – Transactional Video-on-Demand. Refers to a discrete transaction fee for a limited viewing period. Rental terms may vary, but many popular services make rentals available for 30 days from the date of the transaction. Once viewing is started, the renter typically has access to view the title as many times as they like within 48 hours. iVOD – Transactional VOD delivered through an internet service, such as iTunes, Amazon Prime, Google Play or FandangoNow. cVOD – Transactional VOD delivered through a cable or satellite TV service. PVOD – Premium VOD. Refers to a premium priced rental transaction in an early home entertainment window prior to, concurrent with, or very soon after theatrical release. • SVOD* – Subscription Video-on-Demand. Consumers pay a monthly fee to access content including movies and TV shows on demand through SVOD services, such as Netflix, Hulu, CBS All Access and Disney+. • AVOD* – Ad-supported Video-on-Demand. Consumers have access to movies, TV shows and more on demand at no cost through these services, which include consumer advertising. PlutoTV and Tubi are examples of AVOD services. *Some services offer hybrid models in which content is available for free or at a low price with ads, but consumers also may opt out of seeing ads by paying more for their subscription.
    [Show full text]
  • Video Trends Report Q2 2019
    1 VIDEO TRENDS REPORT Q2 2019 © 2019 TiVo Corporation. Introduction 2 Survey Methodology Q2 2019 Survey Size INTRODUCTION 5,340 Geographic Regions U.S., Canada TiVo seeks real consumer opinions to uncover key trends relevant to TV providers, digital publishers, advertisers and consumer electronics manufacturers for our survey, which is administered quarterly and examined biannually in this Age of Respondents published report. We share genuine, unbiased perspectives and feedback from viewers to give video service providers 18+ and industry stakeholders insights for improving and enhancing the overall TV-viewing experience for consumers. TiVo has conducted a quarterly consumer survey since 2012, enabling us to monitor, track and identify key trends in viewing This survey was conducted in Q2 2019 by a leading habits, in addition to compiling opinions about video providers, emerging technologies, connected devices, OTT apps and third-party survey service; TiVo analyzed the results. content discovery features, including personalized recommendations and search. TiVo conducts this survey on a quarterly basis and publishes a biannual report evaluating and analyzing TiVo (NASDAQ: TIVO) brings entertainment together, making it easy to find, watch and enjoy. We serve up the best key trends across the TV industry. movies, shows and videos from across live TV, on-demand, streaming services and countless apps, helping people to watch on their terms. For studios, networks and advertisers, TiVo delivers a passionate group of watchers to increase viewership and engagement across all screens. Go to tivo.com and enjoy watching. For more information about TiVo’s solutions for the media and entertainment industry, visit business.tivo.com or follow us on Twitter @tivoforbusiness.
    [Show full text]
  • JMAD Media Ownership Report
    JMAD New Zealand Media Ownership Report 2014 Published: 2014 December 5 Author: Merja Myllylahti This New Zealand Ownership Report 2014 is the fourth published by AUT’s Centre for Journalism, Media and Democracy (JMAD). The report finds that the New Zealand media market has failed to produce new, innovative media outlets, and that all the efforts to establish non-profit outlets have proved unsustainable. The report confirms the general findings of previous reports that New Zealand media space has remained highly commercial. It also confirms the financialisation of media ownership in the form of banks and fund managers. The report also observes that in 2014 convergence between New Zealand mass media and the communications sector generally was in full swing. Companies, such as Spark (former Telecom NZ), started to compete head-to-head with the traditional broadcasters on the online on-demand video and television markets. The American online video subscription service Netflix is entering the NZ market in March 2015. Additionally, the report notes evidence of uncomfortable alliances between citizen media, politicians, PR companies and legacy media. As Nicky Hager’s Dirty Politics book revealed, the National Party and PR practitioners used the Whale Oil blog to drive their own agendas. Also, events related to Maori TV, TVNZ and Scoop raise questions about political interference in media affairs. It is now evident that the boundaries between mainstream media, bloggers, public relations practitioners and politicians are blurring. Key events and trends concerning New Zealand media Financialisation of mass media ownership confirmed Substantial changes in Fairfax, APN and MediaWorks ownership Competition heats up in online television and video markets Turbulence at Maori TV Blurred lines among politicians, bloggers, journalists and PR practitioners The JMAD New Zealand media ownership reports are available here: http://www.aut.ac.nz/study- at-aut/study-areas/communications/media-networks/journalism,-media-and-democracy-research- centre/journalists-and-projects 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • DOWNLOAD the ARVIG WIFI TV APP Watch on Your TV, Tablet, Computer and Smartphone
    Contact: 888.992.7844 | [email protected] 24/7 Support: 877.290.0560 | [email protected] Chat Online: arvig.net | 7 days a week WiFi arvig.net/WiFiTV Delivered by Arvig® DOWNLOAD THE ARVIG WIFI TV APP Watch on your TV, tablet, computer and smartphone. Available in Google Play and App Store. MORE WAYS TO VIEW PERSONALIZED CLOUD DVR Works with your favorite It learns what you love and No more bulky boxes or wires. streaming devices; Amazon Fire TV, keeps those series and movies Access your recordings on Apple TV and more. front and center. virtually any device.* IT’S ALL HD REPLAY TV WATCH TV EVERYWHERE Auto detection gives Never miss another show. Watch up to the Anytime, anywhere! you the best TV past 72 hours of shows, movies, and sports Stream on almost view available. across most of our channel lineup.* any device.* Rochester Locals WiFi WIFI TV PLANS Delivered by Arvig® Essential Premium Packages Purchase á la Carte with Choice and 3 KIMT - CBS Rochester 7 The CW 609 This TV Complete WiFi Plans 4 KYIN - PBS Rochester 11 KTTC - NBC Rochester 5 KSMQ - PBS Rochester 12 KXLT - FOX Rochester HBO-Cinemax 6 KAAL - ABC Rochester 300 HBO 311 MoreMAX 301 HBO 2 312 MAX Latino 302 HBO Signature 313 5StarMAX 303 HBO Family 314 ThrillerMAX Choice Includes Essential Channels 304 HBO Comedy 315 MovieMAX 15 WGN - Chicago 47 CNN Headline News 81 HGTV 305 HBO Zone 316 OuterMAX 24 Lifetime 48 CNBC 83 Food Network 310 Cinemax 317 ActionMAX 25 USA Network 49 truTV 84 Travel Channel 26 TNT 50 Freeform 90 Bravo Showtime-TMC 27 TBS 53 Universal Kids 91 A&E
    [Show full text]
  • Multicast Video-On-Demand Services £
    Multicast Video-on-Demand Services £ Huadong Ma Kang G. Shin College of Computer Science & Technology Real-Time Computing Laboratory Beijing University of Posts and Telecomm. Department of EECS Beijing 100876, China The University of Michigan [email protected] Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2122, USA [email protected] ABSTRACT distance learning, tele-shopping, news-on-demand, and medical in- The server’s storage I/O and network I/O bandwidths are the main formation service. In general, the VoD service can be characterized bottleneck of VoD service. Multicast offers an efficient means of as follows. distributing a video program to multiple clients, thus greatly im- Long-lived session: a VoD system should support long-lived ses- proving the VoD performance. However, there are many problems sions; for example, a typical movie-on-demand service usu- to overcome before development of multicast VoD systems. This ally lasts 90–120 minutes. paper critically evaluates and discusses the recent progress in devel- oping multicast VoD systems. We first present the concept and ar- High bandwidth requirements: for example, server storage I/O and chitecture of multicast VoD, and then introduce the techniques used network bandwidth requirements are 1.5 Mbps (3-10 Mbps) in multicast VoD systems. We also analyze and evaluate problems for a MPEG-1 (MPEG-2) stream. related to multicast VoD service. Finally, we present open issues on multicast VoD as possible future research directions. Support for VCR-like interactivity: a client requires the VoD sys- tem to offer VCR-like interactivity, such as the ability to play, Keywords: Quality-of-Service (QoS), scheduling, VCR-like in- forward, reverse and pause.
    [Show full text]
  • Video on Demand User Manual Video on Demand User Manual 1
    Video On Demand User Manual Video On Demand User Manual 1. Introduction and Product Overview Flow’s Video on Demand (VOD) product is an advanced video service that lets you, the customer, select and watch the programs you want from hundreds of movies including blockbusters premiers, library titles, TV series, adult content, music videos, and kids/ family programming whenever you choose to watch (on demand). VOD gives you complete control of your programs including the ability to pause, rewind, fast forward or even stop a program, return to view it, or even start over. Once a program has been purchased, you have up to 24 hours from its initial rental to complete viewing of general content. For adult content, you have up to 6 hours to complete viewing, with unlimited views during that time for each categories of content. VOD programming is paid or free. As in the example of HBO, HBO on Demand is included with your HBO subscription. The prices for paid VOD programming are easily visible from any program you select from your VOD Library. 2. Introduction and Product Overview The VOD Library is composed of various high level and sub-level folders to better organize your program viewing including: • Recently Watched • Movies • TV Shows • HBO • FOX • Kids • Music • Caribbean • Adult The Recently Watched folder stores your recently purchased and/or played programs into a single location for easier access. The remainder of the categories such as Movies and TV Shows are further broken down by genre and in some cases alphabetically making it easy to find a movie or TV program for your viewing pleasure.
    [Show full text]
  • Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network
    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE May 2016 Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network Laura Osur Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Osur, Laura, "Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network" (2016). Dissertations - ALL. 448. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/448 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract When Netflix launched in April 1998, Internet video was in its infancy. Eighteen years later, Netflix has developed into the first truly global Internet TV network. Many books have been written about the five broadcast networks – NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox, and the CW – and many about the major cable networks – HBO, CNN, MTV, Nickelodeon, just to name a few – and this is the fitting time to undertake a detailed analysis of how Netflix, as the preeminent Internet TV networks, has come to be. This book, then, combines historical, industrial, and textual analysis to investigate, contextualize, and historicize Netflix's development as an Internet TV network. The book is split into four chapters. The first explores the ways in which Netflix's development during its early years a DVD-by-mail company – 1998-2007, a period I am calling "Netflix as Rental Company" – lay the foundations for the company's future iterations and successes. During this period, Netflix adapted DVD distribution to the Internet, revolutionizing the way viewers receive, watch, and choose content, and built a brand reputation on consumer-centric innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Get the White Paper
    CONNECTED TV RETHINKING THE MARKETING MIX: LEVERAGING CONNECTED TV The times they are a-changin’ in television; the growing popularity of online television services such as Netflix and Lightbox is eroding the role of mainstream television in consumer advertising. It’s a new picture, and many media organisations are playing catch up - only a few years ago, broadcast television was the dominant way into all New Zealand homes. Defining Connected TV The Metro-Provincial Divide It is not surprising that light TV viewers are harder to reach using mainstream commercial TV. Some commentators squabble over There is a difference between Metro TV viewers and Provincial/ what Connected TV is. Rural TV viewers. As a general rule, Metro TV viewers tend to be Is a consumer really ‘watching TV’ if light viewers, while Provincial/Rural viewers tend to spend more time in front of the box. This is largely because the average Metro she watches a clip from Seven Sharp viewer spends less time at home, is more likely to have high- on Facebook, or if she catches up quality broadband access and uses multiple online devices. on news clips over breakfast? Around 55% of New Zealanders live in a metro market, where Getting too deep into definitions the peak PUT (people using television) is much lower than in the isn’t helpful for media planners. provinces. Connected TV is a broad term that covers anything beyond broadcast Peak People Using Television (AP25-54) TV. Whether this be a consumer 50 watching interactive TV, or clips via 40 social, or video on demand.
    [Show full text]
  • See TV in a Whole
    1688 PAC-12 Washington HD NEW 1908 Starz! Cinema HD (E) NEW 3302 ESPN Deportes 1682 PAC-12 Network HD NEW 1904 Starz! Edge HD NEW 3077 EWTN en Espanol 106 Pay Per View Events HD 1902 Starz! HD (E) NEW 3303 FOX Deportes 1101 Pay Per View Events HD 1903 Starz! HD (W) NEW 3304 GolTV 1012 PBS HD (WHLADT) 1906 Starz! In Black HD NEW 3104 History en Espanol See TV in a whole 1170 Pets.TV HD NEW 1912 Starz! Kids and Family HD NEW 3056 La Familia Cosmovision 9161 Premier League Extra 1931 Starz! On Demand 3017 Latele Novela Time 1 HD NEW 1151 Syfy HD 3078 TBN Enlace 9162 Premier League Extra 1560 TBN HD 3024 TV Chile Time 2 HD NEW 1112 TBS HD 3020 Video Rola 9163 Premier League Extra 1010 The CW HD (WXOWDT2) 3013 WAPA America Time 3 HD NEW 1335 The Hub HD 9164 Premier League Extra 1225 The Weather Channel HD Time 4 HD NEW 1838 ThrillerMAX HD (E) 9165 Premier League Extra 1839 ThrillerMAX HD (W) International Programming Time 5 HD NEW 1250 TLC HD 1420 QVC HD 1882 TMC HD (E) NEW 3740 Al Jazeera America 1458 Recipe.TV HD NEW 1883 TMC HD (W) NEW 3710 Bollywood Hits on Demand 1799 REELZ HD 1888 TMC On Demand 3882 Channel One Russia 1916 RetroPlex HD NEW 1884 TMC Xtra HD (E) NEW 3603 China Central TV 1476 RFD-TV HD NEW 1885 TMC Xtra HD (W) NEW 3604 CTI-Zhong Tian Channel 1258 Science HD 1108 TNT HD 3682 Filipino on Demand 1424 ShopHQ HD 1/1/14 1254 Travel Channel HD 3802 Rai Italia 1789 Shorts NEW 1164 truTV HD 3704 Sony Entertainment 1854 Showtime 2 HD (E) NEW 1790 Turner Classic Movies HD Television Asia (SET Asia) 1855 Showtime 2 HD (W) NEW 1138 TV Land HD 3706 STAR India PLUS La Crosse 1860 Showtime Beyond HD (E) NEW 1157 TV One HD 3681 The Filipino Channel 1861 Showtime Beyond 4005 UniMas HD 3703 TV Asia HD (W) NEW 1104 Universal HD 3680 TV Japan Channel Lineup 1858 Showtime Extreme 1644 Universal Sports HD NEW 3832 TV5 Monde Channel lineup is subject to change.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Things You Need to Know Before Launching a Video on Demand Service
    5 Things you Need to Know Before Launching a Video on Demand service A Mobile Operator’s Guide VIDEO ON DEMAND MADE EAS Y 1 The purpose of this eBook is to provide you the reader Introduction with an overview of five key areas you will need to consider before launching a Video on Demand (VoD) service. At Vennetics (vennetics.com) we provide VoD based services to operators in Europe, Canada, USA and the Caribbean. It’s been our experience that the following five areas are key to informing decision makers as to the challenges and opportunities that a VoD service presents. Challenges such as meeting the evolving entertainment demands of your customers, while preserving the economics of your mobile network and at the same time creating a new opportunity for revenue growth. The fve areas addressed by chapter are as follows: 01 Current Video on Demand and TV viewing trends 02 Target markets 03 Video and the data usage implications for your customers 04 New developments in providing a VoD service 05 The benefts of launching a VoD service The book is designed to be concise. It contains the latest industry trends, data and examples of real operator deployments and VoD propositions. We hope you fnd it interesting and helpful. 2 Video on Demand & TV 01 Viewing Trends The world of TV has moved from “prime time viewing” to a more convenient “my time viewing”. Your customers want and expect to be able to consume content anytime, anywhere. Service providers especially over-the-top (OTT) players like Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, Apple and Google to name a few are making premium video content available anytime, anywhere and on any device.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Securing Platform Carriage Deals Is Vital for Britbox a Report Prepared by Oliver & Ohlbaum Associates Ltd
    March 2020 Why securing platform carriage deals is vital for BritBox A report prepared by Oliver & Ohlbaum Associates Ltd Why securing platform carriage deals is vital for BritBox Summary: • Ahead of BritBox’s launch in the UK last November our research found that 19 per cent of people were interested in it; we predicted this might translate into 1.7 million subscribers at the end of the first year • Having conducted further research almost four months after launch, we found that only 1.5 per cent of respondents have a subscription, representing around 380,000 subscribers • A further 560,000 have tried the service but won’t be subscribing, while 100,000 have already cancelled their paid subscriptions – suggesting that BritBox has failed to capitalise on the initial interest • The net promoter score of -46 indicates that a sizeable majority of consumers would not recommend the service to friends • With Disney+ launching on March 24, following its strong performance in the US, there is a risk that BritBox will struggle to establish itself in the face of significant and increasing competition • If BritBox is to have any chance of success in the UK, ITV and the BBC need to act fast to capitalise on brand recognition, and implement platform carriage deals as soon as possible BritBox – ITV and the BBC’s subscription video on demand (SVoD) service – arrived in the UK last November, offering a library of British content and a small number of original programmes. At a cost of £5.99 per month, BritBox is slightly cheaper than the standard plans from the biggest subscription video on demand (SVoD) players in the UK market: Netflix costs £8.99 per month, while Amazon Prime Video costs £7.99 per month.
    [Show full text]