DOCSLIB.ORG

Download the Full Report Pdf, 1.9 MB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download the Full Report Pdf, 1.9 MB VKM Report 2016: 55 Assessment of manure and digestive tract content from slaughterhouses as a pathway for weeds and plant pests Opinion of the Panel on Plant Health of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety Report from the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) 2016: 55 Assessment of manure and digestive tract content from slaughterhouses as a pathway for weeds and plant pests Opinion of the Panel on Plant Health of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety 15.11.2016 ISBN: 978-82-8259-245-1 Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) Po 4404 Nydalen N – 0403 Oslo Norway Phone: +47 21 62 28 00 Email: [email protected] www.vkm.no www.english.vkm.no Suggested citation: VKM. (2016) Risk assessment of manure and digestive tract content from slaughterhouses as a pathway for weeds and plant pests. Opinion of the Panel on Plant Health, ISBN: 978-82-8259-245-1, Oslo, Norway. VKM Report 2016: 55 Assessment of manure and digestive tract content from slaughterhouses as a pathway for weeds and plant pests Authors preparing the draft opinion Leif Sundheim, Åshild Ergon, Christer Magnusson, Jan Netland, Egil Prestløkken, Arild Sletten, May-Guri Sæthre, Elin Thingnæs Lid (VKM staff), Tron Gifstad (VKM staff), Micael Wendell (VKM staff). Assessed and approved The opinion has been assessed and approved by the Panel on Plant Health. Members of the panel are: Trond Rafoss (chair), Guro Brodal, Åshild Ergon, Christer Magnusson, Arild Sletten, Halvor Solheim, Leif Sundheim, May-Guri Sæthre, Anne Marte Tronsmo, Bjørn Økland. Acknowledgments The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has appointed a working group consisting of both VKM members and external experts to answer the request from the Norwegian Food Safety Authority. Project leader from the VKM secretariat has been Elin Thingnæs Lid (until May 2016) and Tron Gifstad (from May 2016). The members of the working group, Leif Sundheim (chair), Åshild Ergon, Christer Magnusson, Arild Sletten, May-Guri Sæthre (Panel on Plant Health), Jan Netland (Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research), and Egil Prestløkken (Norwegian University of Life Sciences) are acknowledged for their valuable work on this opinion. John Ingar Øverland (the Norwegian Agricultural Extension Service) is acknowledged for information on production area and yields for legumes in Norway. Lucy Robertson (Norwegian University of Life Sciences) is acknowledged for copyediting the report. Trine Eggen (Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research) is acknowledged for reviewing the report. Competence of VKM experts Persons working for VKM, either as appointed members of the Committee or as external experts, do this by virtue of their scientific expertise, not as representatives for their employers or third party interests. The Civil Services Act instructions on legal competence apply for all work prepared by VKM. VKM Report 2016: 55 Table of Contents Summary ................................................................................................................ 7 Sammendrag på norsk ......................................................................................... 11 Abbreviations and/or glossary ............................................................................. 15 Background as provided by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority ...................... 18 Terms of reference as provided by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority ........... 19 Assessment .......................................................................................................... 20 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 20 1.1 Purpose and scope ............................................................................................... 20 1.2 Methodology ....................................................................................................... 20 Ratings of probabilities and uncertainties ..................................................... 21 Literature search strategy .......................................................................... 21 Data collection .......................................................................................... 22 Previous risk assessments .......................................................................... 22 2 Pest identity and probability of association with the pathway at origin ...... 23 2.1 Identification of pest sources in animal feed and bedding ........................................ 23 Composition of the feed ............................................................................. 23 2.1.1.1 Plant species and ingredients in concentrates............................................ 25 2.1.1.2 Plant species and plant materials in forage ............................................... 27 2.1.1.3 Plant species and plant materials in other feed .......................................... 27 Composition of bedding ............................................................................. 27 2.2 Identity of pests associated with the pathway at origin ........................................... 28 Weeds ...................................................................................................... 28 Plant pathogenic fungi, oomycetes and protozoa .......................................... 30 Plant pathogenic bacteria ........................................................................... 32 Plant pathogenic viruses and their vectors ................................................... 33 Plant parasitic nematodes .......................................................................... 34 Phytophagous insects and mites ................................................................. 35 2.3 Probability of pest association with the pathway at origin ........................................ 37 3 Probabilities of pest survival ........................................................................ 42 3.1 Survival in feed and bedding material .................................................................... 42 Conditions during processing of feed and bedding material ........................... 42 3.1.1.1 Concentrates .......................................................................................... 42 VKM Report 2016: 55 3.1.1.2 Silage, haylage and hay............................................................................. 43 3.1.1.3 Other feed ............................................................................................. 44 3.1.1.4 Bedding material .................................................................................... 44 Probabilities of pest survival during processing and storage of feed and bedding material .............................................................................................................. 44 3.1.2.1 Weed .................................................................................................... 44 3.1.2.2 Plant pathogenic fungi, oomycetes and protozoa ....................................... 45 3.1.2.3 Plant pathogenic bacteria and viruses ....................................................... 46 3.1.2.4 Plant parasitic nematodes ....................................................................... 46 3.1.2.5 Phytophagous insects and mites .............................................................. 46 Conclusions on survival of pests in feed and bedding material ....................... 47 3.2 Survival of pests in the digestive tract of domestic animals ...................................... 48 Conditions in the digestive tracts of domestic animals .................................. 48 Probabilities of pest survival in the digestive tracts of the animals ................. 51 3.2.2.1 Weeds ................................................................................................... 51 3.2.2.2 Plant pathogenic fungi, oomycetes and protozoa ....................................... 52 3.2.2.3 Plant pathogenic bacteria and viruses ....................................................... 53 3.2.2.4 Plant parasitic nematodes ....................................................................... 54 3.2.2.5 Phytophagous insects and mites .............................................................. 55 Conclusions on pest survival in the digestive tract of animals ........................ 55 3.3 Survival of pests during manure storage ................................................................ 56 Conditions during storage of manure .......................................................... 56 Probabilities of pest survival during manure storage ..................................... 57 3.3.2.1 Weed .................................................................................................... 57 3.3.2.2 Plant pathogenic fungi and protozoa ........................................................ 59 3.3.2.3 Plant pathogenic bacteria and viruses ....................................................... 60 3.3.2.4 Plant parasitic nematodes ....................................................................... 60 3.3.2.5 Phytophagous insects and mites .............................................................. 61 Conclusions on pest survival during manure storage ..................................... 61 3.4 Summary of conclusions on survival of pests in each step of the pathway ................. 61 4 Probability of spread of plant pests ............................................................. 69
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sclerotinia Diseases of Crop Plants: Biology, Ecology and Disease Management G
    Sclerotinia Diseases of Crop Plants: Biology, Ecology and Disease Management G. S. Saharan • Naresh Mehta Sclerotinia Diseases of Crop Plants: Biology, Ecology and Disease Management Dr. G. S. Saharan Dr. Naresh Mehta CCS Haryana Agricultural University CCS Haryana Agricultural University Hisar, Haryana, India Hisar, Haryana, India ISBN 978-1-4020-8407-2 e-ISBN 978-1-4020-8408-9 Library of Congress Control Number: 2008924858 © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Printed on acid-free paper 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 springer.com Foreword The fungus Sclerotinia has always been a fancy and interesting subject of research both for the mycologists and pathologists. More than 250 species of the fungus have been reported in different host plants all over the world that cause heavy economic losses. It was a challenge to discover weak links in the disease cycle to manage Sclerotinia diseases of large number of crops. For researchers and stu- dents, it has been a matter of concern, how to access voluminous literature on Sclerotinia scattered in different journals, reviews, proceedings of symposia, workshops, books, abstracts etc. to get a comprehensive picture. With the publi- cation of book on ‘Sclerotinia’, it has now become quite clear that now only three species of Sclerotinia viz., S.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychrophilic Fungi from the World's Roof
    Persoonia 34, 2015: 100–112 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/pimj RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/003158515X685878 Psychrophilic fungi from the world’s roof M. Wang1,2, X. Jiang3, W. Wu3, Y. Hao1, Y. Su1, L. Cai1, M. Xiang1, X. Liu1 Key words Abstract During a survey of cold-adapted fungi in alpine glaciers on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, 1 428 fungal isolates were obtained of which 150 species were preliminary identified. Phoma sclerotioides and Pseudogymnoascus pan- glaciers norum were the most dominant species. Psychrotolerant species in Helotiales (Leotiomycetes, Ascomycota) were Phoma sclerotioides studied in more detail as they represented the most commonly encountered group during this investigation. Two Pseudogymnoascus pannorum phylogenetic trees were constructed based on the partial large subunit nrDNA (LSU) to infer the taxonomic place- Psychrophila ments of these strains. Our strains nested in two well-supported major clades, which represented Tetracladium and psychrotolerant a previously unknown lineage. The unknown lineage is distant to any other currently known genera in Helotiales. Tetracladium Psychrophila gen. nov. was therefore established to accommodate these strains which are characterised by globose or subglobose conidia formed from phialides on short or reduced conidiophores. Our analysis also showed that an LSU-based phylogeny is insufficient in differentiating strains at species level. Additional analyses using combined sequences of ITS+TEF1+TUB regions were employed to further investigate the phylogenetic relationships of these strains. Together with the recognisable morphological distinctions, six new species (i.e. P. antarctica, P. lutea, P. oli- vacea, T. ellipsoideum, T. globosum and T. psychrophilum) were described. Our preliminary investigation indicates a high diversity of cold-adapted species in nature, and many of them may represent unknown species.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Diet and Micro-Habitat Values for Wildlife and the Agronomic Potential of Selected Grassland Plant Species
    Report Number 697 Review of the diet and micro-habitat values for wildlifeand the agronomic potential of selected grassland plant species English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 697 Review of the diet and micro-habitat values for wildlife and the agronomic potential of selected grassland plant species S.R. Mortimer, R. Kessock-Philip, S.G. Potts, A.J. Ramsay, S.P.M. Roberts & B.A. Woodcock Centre for Agri-Environmental Research University of Reading, PO Box 237, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AR A. Hopkins, A. Gundrey, R. Dunn & J. Tallowin Institute for Grassland and Environmental Research North Wyke Research Station, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB J. Vickery & S. Gough British Trust for Ornithology The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like for non-commercial purposes, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA. However, if you wish to use all or part of this report for commercial purposes, including publishing, you will need to apply for a licence by contacting the Enquiry Service at the above address. Please note this report may also contain third party copyright material. ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2006 Project officer Heather Robertson, Terrestrial Wildlife Team [email protected] Contractor(s) (where appropriate) S.R. Mortimer, R. Kessock-Philip, S.G. Potts, A.J. Ramsay, S.P.M. Roberts & B.A. Woodcock Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, University of Reading, PO Box 237, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AR A.
    [Show full text]
  • Synchytrium Endobioticum (Schilb.) Percival Pest Risk Assessment for Oregon
    Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilb.) Percival Pest Risk Assessment for Oregon This pest risk assessment follows the format used by the Exotic Forest Pest Information System for North America. For a description of the evaluation process used, see http://spfnic.fs.fed.us/exfor/download.cfm. IDENTITY Name: Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilb.) Percival Taxonomic Position: Chytridiales: Synchytriaceae Common Name: Potato wart disease RISK RATING SUMMARY Numerical Score: 6 Relative Risk Rating: HIGH Uncertainty: Very Certain Uncertainty in this assessment results from: Potato wart has been extensively studied in the countries in which it is established. RISK RATING DETAILS Establishment potential is HIGH Justification: Potato wart is apparently native to the Andes Mountains and has subsequently been spread throughout the world through the movement of infected or contaminated tubers. It has become successfully established in several countries in Europe, Asia, Africa, North America, South America, and Oceania. Previous detections in Maryland, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia had reportedly been eradicated by 1974, although surveys conducted in Maryland revealed the presence of resting spores of the pathogen were still present in one home garden. The spores were reportedly non-viable. Spread potential is MODERATE Justification: Potato wart has been spread throughout the world through the movement of infested tubers. Local spread is primarily through the movement of contaminated soil on equipment, vehicle tires, tubers, and plants. Spores may also be spread by wind. Symptoms in the field may not manifest until after repeated cultivation of susceptible hosts within a field or garden. Infected tubers may not manifest symptoms until in storage; however, meristematic tissue (sprouts) may be so severely affected plants will not emerge from infected seed tubers.
    [Show full text]
  • Minireview Snow Molds: a Group of Fungi That Prevail Under Snow
    Microbes Environ. Vol. 24, No. 1, 14–20, 2009 http://wwwsoc.nii.ac.jp/jsme2/ doi:10.1264/jsme2.ME09101 Minireview Snow Molds: A Group of Fungi that Prevail under Snow NAOYUKI MATSUMOTO1* 1Department of Planning and Administration, National Agricultural Research Center for Hokkaido Region, 1 Hitsujigaoka, Toyohira-ku, Sapporo 062–8555, Japan (Received January 5, 2009—Accepted January 30, 2009—Published online February 17, 2009) Snow molds are a group of fungi that attack dormant plants under snow. In this paper, their survival strategies are illustrated with regard to adaptation to the unique environment under snow. Snow molds consist of diverse taxonomic groups and are divided into obligate and facultative fungi. Obligate snow molds exclusively prevail during winter with or without snow, whereas facultative snow molds can thrive even in the growing season of plants. Snow molds grow at low temperatures in habitats where antagonists are practically absent, and host plants deteriorate due to inhibited photosynthesis under snow. These features characterize snow molds as opportunistic parasites. The environment under snow represents a habitat where resources available are limited. There are two contrasting strategies for resource utilization, i.e., individualisms and collectivism. Freeze tolerance is also critical for them to survive freezing temper- atures, and several mechanisms are illustrated. Finally, strategies to cope with annual fluctuations in snow cover are discussed in terms of predictability of the habitat. Key words: snow mold, snow cover, low temperature, Typhula spp., Sclerotinia borealis Introduction Typical snow molds have a distinct life cycle, i.e., an active phase under snow and a dormant phase from spring to In northern regions with prolonged snow cover, plants fall.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Genome Sequence of Sclerotinia Borealis, a Psychrophilic Plant Pathogenic Fungus
    Draft Genome Sequence of Sclerotinia borealis, a Psychrophilic Plant Pathogenic Fungus Andrey V. Mardanov, Alexey V. Beletsky, Vitaly V. Kadnikov, Alexander N. Ignatov, Nikolai V. Ravin Centre Bioengineering, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia Sclerotinia borealis is a necrotrophic phytopathogenic fungus notable for its wide host range and environmental persis- tence. It grows at low temperatures, causing snow mold disease of crop plants. To understand the molecular mechanisms of its pathogenesis and adaptation to the psychrophilic lifestyle, we determined the 39.3-Mb draft genome sequence of S. borealis F-4128. Received 9 December 2013 Accepted 10 December 2013 Published 23 January 2014 Citation Mardanov AV, Beletsky AV, Kadnikov VV, Ignatov AN, Ravin NV. 2014. Draft genome sequence of Sclerotinia borealis, a psychrophilic plant pathogenic fungus. Genome Announc. 2(1):e01175-13. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01175-13. Copyright © 2014 Mardanov et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. Address correspondence to Andrey V. Mardanov, [email protected]. clerotinia species are among the most diverse and widely gene order conservation. The arsenal of genes associated with the Sdistributed phytopathogenic fungi causing many economi- necrotrophic lifestyle is also similar between species, including the cally important diseases of crop plants (1). Sclerotinia borealis genes involved in plant cell wall degradation. However, many ge- Bubák & Vleugel has a broad host range, infecting at least 17 nome regions and genes specific to S. borealis may be responsible plant genera from the families Alliaceae, Asteraceae, Brassi- for its adaptation to particular ecological niches and conditions of caceae, Campanulaceae, Fabaceae, Iridaceae, Pinaceae, and growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Protein Sequence Signatures Associate with Sclerotinia Borealis Lifestyle and Secretion in Fungal Pathogens of the Sclerotiniaceae
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 24 September 2015 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00776 Common protein sequence signatures associate with Sclerotinia borealis lifestyle and secretion in fungal pathogens of the Sclerotiniaceae Thomas Badet 1, 2, Rémi Peyraud 1, 2 and Sylvain Raffaele 1, 2* Edited by: 1 Laboratoire des Interactions Plantes-Microorganismes, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR441, Delphine Vincent, Castanet-Tolosan, France, 2 Laboratoire des Interactions Plantes-Microorganismes, Centre National de la Recherche Department of Environment and Scientifique, UMR2594, Castanet-Tolosan, France Primary Industries, Australia Reviewed by: Fungal plant pathogens produce secreted proteins adapted to function outside fungal Jana Sperschneider, Commonwealth Scientific and cells to facilitate colonization of their hosts. In many cases such as for fungi from Industrial Research Organisation, the Sclerotiniaceae family the repertoire and function of secreted proteins remains Australia elusive. In the Sclerotiniaceae, whereas Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Botrytis cinerea are Kim Marilyn Plummer, La Trobe University, Australia cosmopolitan broad host-range plant pathogens, Sclerotinia borealis has a psychrophilic *Correspondence: lifestyle with a low optimal growth temperature, a narrow host range and geographic Sylvain Raffaele, distribution. To spread successfully, S. borealis must synthesize proteins adapted to Laboratoire des Interactions Plante Micro-organismes, 24 Chemin de function in its specific environment. The search for signatures of adaptation to S. borealis Borde Rouge – Auzeville, 31326 lifestyle may therefore help revealing proteins critical for colonization of the environment Castanet Tolosan, France by Sclerotiniaceae fungi. Here, we analyzed amino acids usage and intrinsic protein [email protected] disorder in alignments of groups of orthologous proteins from the three Sclerotiniaceae Specialty section: species.
    [Show full text]
  • Microdochium Nivale in Perennial Grasses: Snow Mould Resistance, Pathogenicity and Genetic Diversity
    Philosophiae Doctor (PhD), Thesis 2016:32 (PhD), Doctor Philosophiae ISBN: 978-82-575-1324-5 Norwegian University of Life Sciences ISSN: 1894-6402 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Biosciences Department of Plant Sciences Philosophiae Doctor (PhD) Thesis 2016:32 Mohamed Abdelhalim Microdochium nivale in perennial grasses: Snow mould resistance, pathogenicity and genetic diversity Microdochium nivale i flerårig gras: Resistens mot snømugg, patogenitet og genetisk diversitet Postboks 5003 Mohamed Abdelhalim NO-1432 Ås, Norway +47 67 23 00 00 www.nmbu.no Microdochium nivale in perennial grasses: Snow mould resistance, pathogenicity and genetic diversity. Microdochium nivale i flerårig gras: Resistens mot snømugg, patogenitet og genetisk diversitet. Philosophiae Doctor (PhD) Thesis Mohamed Abdelhalim Department of Plant Sciences Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Biosciences Norwegian University of Life Sciences Ås (2016) Thesis number 2016:32 ISSN 1894-6402 ISBN 978-82-575-1324-5 Supervisors: Professor Anne Marte Tronsmo Department of Plant Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences P.O. Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway Professor Odd Arne Rognli Department of Plant Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences P.O. Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway Adjunct Professor May Bente Brurberg Department of Plant Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences P.O. Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway The Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO) Pb 115, NO-1431 Ås, Norway Researcher Dr. Ingerd Skow Hofgaard The Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO) Pb 115, NO-1431 Ås, Norway Dr. Petter Marum Graminor AS. Bjørke forsøksgård, Hommelstadvegen 60 NO-2344 Ilseng, Norway Associate Professor Åshild Ergon Department of Plant Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Potato Wart Disease
    Potato Wart Disease Why the concern? Potato wart disease, caused by the soil-borne fungus Synchytrium endobioticum, affects cultivated potato and a number of wild Solanum species. It was once the most serious disease of potato but has now been controlled by statutory measures and the development of ‘immune’ varieties. However, it still poses a significant threat to potato production because the spores of the fungus can remain viable in contaminated soil for many years. Also, new strains of the fungus, capable of attacking potato varieties that were previously resistant, have developed in several European countries. Preventing the spread of these strains to the UK is especially important. Severe infection of potato tuber Where is it found? It is thought that the disease was first introduced to Europe with breeding material from the South American Andes in the aftermath of the 1840–50 potato blight disaster. Potato wart disease then spread to nearly all potato growing countries in Europe, until statutory measures finally restricted its spread. In most European countries, including the UK, it is now found only locally. Its distribution is very limited in other parts of the world. What does it look like? Potato tubers showing outgrowths from the eyes Symptoms usually appear only on tubers and stolons (underground stems), therefore the disease is often not noticed until the tubers are lifted; true roots are never affected. However, infected plants may occasionally produce symptoms above ground including a reduction in vigour and with small, greenish-yellow warty growths at the stem base. On infected tubers, the eyes develop into characteristic warty, cauliflower-like swellings.
    [Show full text]
  • EPPO Reporting Service
    ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE EUROPEAN AND MEDITERRANEAN ET MEDITERRANEENNE PLANT PROTECTION POUR LA PROTECTION DES PLANTES ORGANIZATION EPPO Reporting Service NO. 2 PARIS, 2008-02-01 CONTENTS _____________________________________________________________________ Pests & Diseases 2008/022 - First report of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus in Portugal 2008/023 - Rhynchophorus ferrugineus detected on new palm species in Italy 2008/024 - Absence of Dryocosmus kuriphilus in Germany 2008/025 - Update on the situation of Agrilus planipennis in Canada 2008/026 - First report of Tomato chlorotic dwarf viroid on Petunia in the Czech Republic 2008/027 - First report of Synchytrium endobioticum in Bulgaria 2008/028 - First report of Eutypella parasitica in Croatia 2008/029 - Ceratocystis fimbriata f.sp. platani found in Aquitaine, France 2008/030 - Incursion of Phytophthora hibernalis in Germany 2008/031 - Status of Phytophthora ramorum in the Czech Republic 2008/032 - First report of Iris yellow spot virus on Eustoma grandiflorum in the United Kingdom 2008/033 - First report of Iris yellow spot virus on onion in Germany 2008/034 - First report of Iris yellow spot virus on onion in Canada 2008/035 - Outbreak of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis in Austria 2008/036 - Results after ten years of phytosanitary measures applied in Italy against Aphelenchoides besseyi 2008/037 - EPPO report on notifications of non-compliance 2008/038 - A new BBCH growth stage key for trees and woody plants 2008/039 - Workshop on citrus huanglongbing (Candidatus Liberibacter
    [Show full text]
  • Sommerfeltia 31 Innmat 20080203.Indd
    SOMMERFELTIA 31 (2008) 125 SNOW MOLD FUNGUS, TYPHULA ISHIKARIENSIS GROUP III, IN ARC- TIC NORWAY CAN GROW AT A SUB-LETHAL TEMPERATURE AFTER FREEZING STRESS AND DURING FLOODING. T. Hoshino, A.M. Tronsmo & I. Yumoto Hoshino, T., Tronsmo, A.M. & Yumoto, I. 2008. Snow mold fungus, Typhula ishikariensis group III, in Arctic Norway can grow at a sub-lethal temperature after freezing stress and during flooding. – Sommerfeltia 31: 125-131. ISBN 82-7420-045-4. ISSN 0800-6865. Isolates of the snow mold fungus Typhula ishikariensis group III, which is predominant in Finnmark (northern Norway) and Svalbard, are more resistant to freezing stress than group I isolates from the southern part of Norway. Group III isolates showed irregular growth on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates when subjected to heat stress at 10˚C. However, group III isolates showed relatively good growth on PDA at 10˚C after freezing treatment. The optimal temperatures for mycelial growth were 5˚C on PDA and 10˚C in potato dextrose broth (PDB), and group III isolates showed normal mycelial growth at 10˚C in PDB. Mycelium of group III isolates cultivated in water poured into PDA plates, and normal hyphal extension was observed only in the liquid media. Hyphal growth became irregular when mycelia had extended above the surface of the liquid media. These results suggested that group III isolates can grow at a sub-lethal temperature after freezing stress and during flooding. Soil freezing and thawing occurs regularly in the Arctic, and physiological characteristics of group III isolates are well adapted to climatic conditions in the Arctic.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollinator Survey Report Year 3
    January 2017 Gabrielle Flinn Saving the small things that run the planet 1 Summary Fife’s Buzzing is a three year project and during this time aimed to create wildflower meadows at 16 parks totalling over 12 hectares across Fife. Sites for meadow creation were selected across the Kingdom of Fife to deliver multiple benefits for both wildlife and people. The creation and enhancement of meadows through this project has involved planting a diverse range of native wildflower and grass species of known origin that will provide vital foraging and nesting habitat for pollinating insects and other wildlife. Surveys to record invertebrates, focusing on pollinating insects, before and after meadow creation have identified species using the meadows as well as changes within the meadow over the project lifetime. During pollinator surveys in August 2016, a total of 23 sites, selected for meadow creation, enhancement and management in autumn 2015 and spring 2016, were surveyed for pollinators. Baseline surveys were also undertaken in Haugh Park in Cupar, Bankie Park in Anstruther and at Tayport Common in Tayport. A total of 122 species of invertebrate were recorded during this survey and this total includes 65 species of pollinating insect. A higher number of species of invertebrate were recorded within areas of wildflower rich-grasslands (122 species) than in areas of amenity grassland (five species). 2 Contents Page Page Number 1. Project introduction 3 2. Pollinator survey method 5 2.1 Sweeping vegetation 7 2.2 Direct observations 7 3. Results 8 4. Discussion 10 5. Conclusion 12 Acknowledgements 13 Appendix 1. Complete list of invertebrate species 14 References 24 3 1.
    [Show full text]