Annual Report 15-16.Pdf (11.65

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report 15-16.Pdf (11.65 Magistrates’ Court of Victoria 2015 2016 30 September 2016 The Honourable Linda Dessau AM, Governor of Victoria Government House Melbourne Vic 3004 Dear Governor, On behalf of the Council of Magistrates, I present the Magistrates’ Court Annual Report for the year 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016 pursuant to section 15(3) of the Magistrates’ Court Act 1989. Yours sincerely PETER LAURITSEN Chief Magistrate The Magistrates’ Court of Victoria (the Court) is an innovative, accessible and responsive court that provides quality service to the Victorian community. The Court sits at 51 metropolitan and regional locations and is comprised of 103 magistrates, 16 reserve magistrates, 10 judicial registrars, 614 staff and 85 elders and respected persons. CONTENTS 2 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE 47 SPECIALIST COURTS AND SERVICES 3 THE YEAR AT A GLANCE 48 COURT SUPPORT AND DIVERSION 4 MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF SERVICES MAGISTRATE 53 ASSESSMENT AND REFERRAL COURT LIST 6 MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 55 COURT INTERGRATED SERVICES PROGRAM AND KOORI LIAISON 9 ABOUT THE MAGISTRATES’ OFFICER PROGRAM COURT 56 COURT ADVICE AND SUPPORT OFFICER 10 THE JUDICIARY 57 CREDIT/BAIL SUPPORT PROGRAM 11 COMMITTEES 58 CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVERSION 22 THE COURT’S SERVICES PROGRAM AND ENFORCEMENT REVIEW PROGRAM 25 COURT OPERATIONS 61 DRUG COURT 26 CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY 63 FAMILY VIOLENCE AND PERSONAL 27 COORDINATION SUMMARY SAFETY INTERVENTION ORDERS 28 JUDICIAL REGISTRARS 68 KOORI COURT 29 THE LAW LIBRARY OF VICTORIA 70 NEIGHBOURHOOD JUSTICE CENTRE 29 LEGISLATIVE REFORM 72 STATISTICS AND FINANCIALS 31 MAKING A DIFFERENCE 73 FINANCIAL STATEMENT 32 COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA 74 CRIMINAL SUMMARY 33 STATEWIDE PERSPECTIVE 79 CIVIL SUMMARY 34 BARWON SOUTH WEST 82 INTERVENTION ORDER SUMMARY 35 BROADMEADOWS 85 FURTHER INFORMATION 36 DANDENONG 86 JUDICIAL OFFICERS 37 FRANKSTON 88 LIST OF VENUES AND CONTACT 38 GIPPSLAND DETAILS 39 GRAMPIANS 40 HEIDELBERG 41 HUME 42 LODDON MALLEE 43 MELBOURNE 44 RINGWOOD 45 SUNSHINE ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE Mr Peter Lauritsen CHIEF MAGISTRATE DEPUTY CHIEF MAGISTRATES Mr Robert Kumar Mr Barry Braun Ms Felicity Broughton (until 17 November 2015) Mr Andrew Tenni CHIEF EXECUTIVE Mr Dan Muling Mr Lance Martin Ms Jelena Popovic OFFICER (until 22 December 2015) SUPERVISING MAGISTRATES Ms Simone Shields Mr Barry Braun Mr Charlie Rozencwajg Mr Anthony Parsons PRINCIPAL REGISTRAR CIVIL CRIMINAL DRUG COURT & MANAGER METROPOLITAN COURTS Ms Felicity Broughton Ms Jelena Popovic Ms Belinda Wallington Ms Kate Hawkins KOORI COURT AND SEX OFFENCES FAMILY VIOLENCE COURT SUPPORT AND LIST Mr Keith Turner AND FAMILY LAW DIVERSION SERVICES MANAGER REGIONAL COURTS Mr Andrew Capell Ms Johanna Metcalf Mr Rob Challis VOCAT MANAGER SPECIALIST COURTS & COURTS SUPPORT SERVICES STATE COORDINATING MAGISTRATE AND REGIONAL COORDINATING MAGISTRATES Ms Simone Richardson MANAGER CORPORATE Mr Robert Kumar Mr Franz Holzer SERVICES Mr Ronald Saines (until 17 November 2015) STATE BARWON SOUTH Mr Patrick Southey COORDINATING WEST (from 18 November 2015) MAGISTRATE BROADMEADOWS Ms Sharon McAnelly MANAGER ICT SYSTEMS Mr Jack Vandersteen Mr Paul Smith Ms Fiona Hayes DANDENONG FRANKSTON GIPPSLAND Mr Iain McKinnon MANAGER PEOPLE & ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Ms Cynthia Toose Ms Susan Wakeling Ms Stella Stuthbridge GRAMPIANS HEIDELBERG HUME Mr Brett Cain STATE COORDINATING REGISTRAR Mr David Fanning Mr Richard Wright Mr Nunzio La Rosa NEIGHBOURHOOD Mr Joseph Walker LODDON MALLEE RINGWOOD JUSTICE CENTRE MANAGER CEO’s OFFICE Ms Kerry Walker Ms Noreen Toohey DIRECTOR SUNSHINE NEIGHBOURHOOD JUSTICE CENTRE 2 MAGISTRATES’ COURT OF VICTORIA ANNUAL REPORT 2015-2016 THE YEAR AT A GLANCE INTERVENTION ORDER APPLICATIONS RECEIVED BY AFTER HOURS SERVICE CRIMINAL MATTERS CIVIL FINALISED DEFENCES FILED 10,681 7, 240 199,960 INTERVENTION TOTAL CIVIL ORDER CLAIMS FINALISED APPLICATIONS (INCLUDING DEFAULT FINALISED ORDERS) (INCLUDING INTERIM ORDERS) 46,231 CRIMINAL CASES FINALISED WITHIN SIX 74,551 MONTHS 84.3% DEFENDED CIVIL CLAIMS FINALISED WITHIN 6 MONTHS TOTAL TOTAL CRIMINAL 79.9% INTERVENTION LISTINGS ORDER HEARINGS 683,709 122,909 MAGISTRATES’ COURT OF VICTORIA ANNUAL REPORT 2015-2016 3 MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE With pleasure, I present the Annual Report of the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria for the year ending 30 June 2016. Heidelberg In 2015–16, about 6,700 males were The disturbance at the Metropolitan remanded in custody. This was 2,900 Remand Centre in July 2015 reduced In my message last year, I spoke more than 2013–14, an increase of its capacity to hold persons on of the closure of the Heidelberg 77 per cent in two years. At present, remand dramatically. It has not Courthouse and the transfer of there are almost 2,000 persons on reached its former capacity yet. its work to other venues of the remand or about 30 per cent of the However, Corrections Victoria has Magistrates’ Court and Children’s prison population. increased the remand capacity Court. After a long closure, on 25 of other prisons. This process As I said last year, the long-term July 2016, the Courthouse re- continues. I hope that my message answer lies in technology. In the opened. Given the population of for next year will say that the 2015–16 State Budget, monies the area covered by the Heidelberg problem has been solved. Courthouse is nearly the same as became available to expand the the combined population of the Court’s audio visual capacity by Family Violence Northern Territory and the Australian installing an internet-based system Capital Territory, one realises the alongside the existing telephone On 29 March 2016, the Royal significance of the transfer of work based system. By July 2017, the 151 Commission into Family Violence and the remarkable efforts of all new units will be installed statewide. (the Commission) delivered its involved in making it work so At the same time, Corrections report. The Commission made 227 smoothly. Victoria are installing 79 new units in recommendations, many of which its prisons. affected the Court and the Children’s Court directly or indirectly. For Non-production of Persons in Parliament enacted the Justice this message, I will speak briefly Custody Legislation (Evidence and other Acts) about recommendation 60, which Amendment Act 2016. Broadly, this Last year, I thought the temporary envisages the expansion of the Act creates a presumption in favour measures had almost solved this elements of the Family Violence of audio visual links in relation to issue. Unfortunately, I was wrong. Court Division to the headquarter most court appearances by an The issue persists. In recent times, courts in the other 10 regions of accused person. This Act should it has become significant despite the Court and to two other venues. commence on 12 September 2016, a rapid increase this year in the This is a significant undertaking. after which I expect a significant number of audio visual links ordered Since 29 March, both Courts have increase in the use of audio visual by magistrates. The issue must be spent a lot of time planning for the links. seen in context. implementation of this and the other recommendations. 4 MAGISTRATES’ COURT OF VICTORIA ANNUAL REPORT 2015-2016 MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE The fast tracking of criminal This is an important initiative. At the Court’s IT capabilities. For proceedings arising out of family present, almost all of the Court’s example, in the discussion leading violence incidents continues. In regional venues have little or no to recommendation 63, it urged the my report last year, the process security. This position will change in setting up of a “user-friendly, reliable, operated at Dandenong alone. Since each of the respects set out. integrated IT platform for use by then, the process has expanded Victorian courts”. The Court will to Broadmeadows, Shepparton, Drug Court Expansion work with government to respond Ballarat, Ringwood, Frankston and properly to the recommendations. Moorabbin. It will start at Bendigo Again in the recent State Budget, and Geelong on 1 September. monies will be provided for the Acknowledgment expansion of the Drug Court to Safety and Security Melbourne. At present, the Drug I thank my judicial colleagues, the Court operates at Dandenong. The Chief Executive Officer, registrars In the recent State Budget, monies Melbourne expansion will create and staff for their efforts in coping were set aside: a court more than twice the size with the various issues which beset of Dandenong. In combination, the Court. Without their efforts, the (a) To employ extra security officers these Drug Courts should have a Court could not run as smoothly as so that whenever a court or significant impact on those offenders it does. tribunal sits in the state there will with serious drug habits who are be a security presence. Finally, on 31 May 2016, Ian Gray committing serious offences. They retired as a judge of the County (b) Obtain extra x-ray machines, will rehabilitate many who would Court. He had earlier retired as State portable walk-through metal otherwise spend long periods Coroner. Mr Gray was the longest detectors and hand held in prison. The benefits to the serving Chief Magistrate of this Court screening wands so that community are obvious. or any of its predecessors. He served electronic security is present the Court with distinction. whenever a court or tribunal sits. Courtlink (c) Significant building improvements Last year, I spoke about the to 15 venues of the Court Court’s case management system and to the Children’s Court at (Courtlink). The Commission also Melbourne. These improvements looked at it. In a number of parts will include separate waiting areas of its Report, the Commission Peter Lauritsen for applicants and respondents noted Courtlink’s inadequacies. Chief Magistrate in applications for family violence The Report also made a number of intervention orders. recommendations to strengthen MAGISTRATES’ COURT OF VICTORIA ANNUAL REPORT 2015-2016 5 MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 2015–16 has been an unprecedented year for the Court.
Recommended publications
  • The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition Philip Nitschke & Fiona
    (PDF) The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition Philip Nitschke & Fiona Stewart - free pdf download Download PDF The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition, Read Online The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition Book, The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition Book Download, The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition Read Download, Read Best Book Online The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition, full book The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition, PDF The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition Popular Download, Download PDF The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition Free Online, Free Download The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition Books [E-BOOK] The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition Full eBook, Read The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition Full Collection Philip Nitschke & Fiona Stewart, PDF Download The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition Free Collection, The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition PDF read online, Download The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition Online Free, Read Best Book Online The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition, Read The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition Ebook Download, PDF The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition Free Download, The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition Popular Download, Download pdf The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition, The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition Philip Nitschke & Fiona Stewart pdf, Free Download The Peaceful Pill Handbook 2016 Edition Best Book, CLICK FOR DOWNLOAD mobi, azw, epub, pdf Description: The quality is incredible indeed and if you pay 15,000 plus everything but 10 minutes for all my books and it was such an amazing read very much appreciated If to find out from other reviewers please contact me on twitter at davoshaqf or via email DATKARIANDETAILS HERE.
    [Show full text]
  • Children's Court of Victoria Annual Report 2017/18 Children's Court of Victoria
    Children's Court of Victoria Annual Report 2017/18 Children's Court of Victoria About the Court Strategic Priorities The Children’s Court of 2016/2020 Victoria is a specialist court with two divisions dealing Our Value Statement with cases involving children The Children’s Court of Victoria is a fair, accessible, and young people. specialist court. Judicial officers bring legal expertise and experience to the consideration of matters The Family Division hears: applications involving children, young people and their families. relating to the protection and care of children Court processes are effective, equitable and clear. and young persons at risk, and applications Our workforce is highly professional and committed. for intervention orders. The Criminal Division hears: matters relating to Our Culture criminal offending by children and young persons. The culture of the Court is characterised by judicial officers who encourage parties to resolve matters in a way that is collaborative and respectful and where possible, utilising less adversarial processes. Acknowledgment The Court’s judiciary exercise proper control of the The Children’s Court of Victoria acknowledges legal and court process. Resources are allocated the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to cases commensurate to their complexity. as the Traditional Custodians of the land. The relationship between the judiciary and court staff We also acknowledge and pay respect to their is one of mutual regard and respect. Judicial officers Elders, past, present and emerging. and senior managers are partners in building the Court’s reputation as a high performing, innovative and respected jurisdiction in the State’s court hierarchy. We aim to work collaboratively and cooperatively with all those who interact with the Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Equal Justice for a Strong, Healthy and Resilient Latrobe Valley
    February 2019 Equal justice for a strong, healthy and resilient Latrobe Valley Acknowledgement of country The Gippsland Legal Assistance Forum proudly acknowledges the Traditional Owners and custodians of the land on which we are fortunate to live and work, the Gunaikurnai people, and we acknowledge the Boon Wurrung people of the Kulin nation. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and emerging leaders. We acknowledge that sovereignty was never ceded and recognise the ongoing resistance, strength, and resilience of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Victoria and Australia. © 2019 Gippsland Legal Assistance Forum. Reproduction without express written permission is prohibited. Written requests should be directed to Victoria Legal Aid, Corporate Aff airs, Level 9, 570 Bourke Street, Melbourne Vic 3000. Contents About us 4 Executive summary 8 Summary of recommendations 10 Introduction 11 Access to justice and legal need in the Latrobe Valley 13 Legal services in the Latrobe Valley 14 Legal need in the Latrobe Valley 15 Regional priorities 21 Looking forward 21 Investing in community services to strengthen family and community wellbeing 23 Increasing demand 23 Limited access to services 24 Looking forward 26 Responding to family violence 27 Current response 28 Looking forward 28 Supporting access to safe, aff ordable, quality housing 30 Limited access to social and quality housing 30 Protecting tenants’ rights 31 Looking forward 32 Improving timely access to the courts 34 Insuffi cient resourcing and poor infrastructure 34 Impact of delays and current listing practices on clients 35 Looking forward 37 Contact details 39 Use of client stories We use client stories throughout this report to demonstrate the key issues the community is facing.
    [Show full text]
  • Deadly Censorship Games: Keeping a Tight Lid on the Euthanasia Debate
    21 November 2011, 6.39am AEST Deadly censorship games: keeping a tight lid on the euthanasia debate Author 1. Brian Martin Professor of Social Sciences at University of Wollongong Disclosure Statement Brian Martin joined Exit International in order to be able to attend members-only workshops. Provides funding as a Member of The Conversation. uow.edu.au The Australian government vigorously censors information about peaceful ways of dying even though we have access to violent means of ending life. Alex @ Faraway TALKING ABOUT DEATH AND DYING - Why don’t we talk about death and dying? We can choose so many of our life experiences, but it seems we can have no say in whether we die in pain or at peace. Today we look at the Australian government’s efforts to suppress discussion of euthanasia. There’s plenty of information available on how to kill yourself violently, so why does the Australian government so vigorously censor information on peaceful methods? Voluntary euthanasia societies have long been pushing to legalise death with dignity. According to opinion polls, a strong majority of Australians support legalisation , yet Australian governments have been unreceptive. When the Northern Territory government legalised euthanasia in 1996, the federal parliament overruled the law less than a year later. Philip Nitschke, despairing of the legal route , set up Exit International to enable people to learn how to obtain a peaceful death through their own initiative. Exit publications provide information about obtaining pentobarbital, commonly known as Nembutal, the drug of choice everywhere that death with dignity is legal. Censorship and response The Australian government has responded with amazingly draconian censorship.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Violence Policies, Legislation and Services: Improving Access and Suitability for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Men
    Family violence policies, legislation and services: Improving access and suitability for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander men MARCIA LANGTON | KRISTEN SMITH | TAHLIA EASTMAN LILY O’NEILL | EMILY CHEESMAN | MERIBAH ROSE RESEARCH REPORT ISSUE 26 | DECEMBER 2020 ANROWS acknowledgement This material was produced with funding from the Australian Government and the Australian state and territory governments. Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety (ANROWS) gratefully acknowledges the financial and other support it has received from these governments, without which this work would not have been possible. The findings and views reported in this paper are those of the authors and cannot be attributed to the Australian Government, or any Australian state or territory government. Acknowledgement of Country ANROWS acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land across Australia on which we work and live. We pay our respects to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Elders past, present, and future, and we value Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories, cultures, and knowledge. We are committed to standing and working with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, honouring the truths set out in the Warawarni-gu Guma Statement. The cover art features Resilience (2014), an ANROWS-commissioned art series by Christine Blakeney, a Wiradjuri/Yaegl woman from NSW. Peer review process The quality of ANROWS publications is ensured through a rigorous peer review process that is consistent with the principles of the Committee
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2020 - Page 1
    Winter 20 20 Photo by Brett Davis BirdLife Shoalhaven Magazine - Winter 2020 - Page 1 In this issue ... Birders & Landcarers working Is it the Same Old Fight After All? together after the fires by Chris Grounds, by Rob Dunn, BLS President BLS Conservation Officer Page 3 Page 5 Interview with Fiona Stewart Bushfire Research Project by Gary Brady, by Perrie Croshaw BLS Project Officer Page 9 Page 14 Swarovski dG Web Watch - the future of birding? by Chris Grounds - by Daniel Payne, and Marly Grounds Nature Lodge Optics Page 20 Page 19 Conservation Curiosities Facebook - what you've missed by Chris Grounds, by Brett Davis BLS Conservation Officer Page 25 Page 28 Brian O'Leary and the bushfire by Brian O'Leary Contributions Welcome! and Brett Davis ??????? by Everyone Page 30 Cover Photo: Our cover photo this month is a Glossy Black Cockatoo, one of the bird species considered by the Australian Government to be most severely impacted by the Summer 2019 / 2020 fires. The photo was taken by our Editor, Brett Davis. BirdLife Shoalhaven acknowledges the Aboriginal people of the Shoalhaven, their care of country, birds and habitat, and pays respects to all Elders. BirdLife Shoalhaven Magazine - Winter 2020 - Page 2 Birders & Landcarers working together The first of these will fit into our bushfire research project. after the fires SLA have asked for expressions of interest from members to fund on-ground works on their properties. From the - by Rob Dunn, President BirdLife Shoalhaven successful applicants, BLS will invite property owners to It seems that when the going gets tough, the tough still go have periodic bird surveys carried out as part of our birding in the Shoalhaven.
    [Show full text]
  • National Classification Scheme Review
    National Classification Scheme Review DISCUSSION PAPER You are invited to provide a submission or comment on this Discussion Paper. Discussion Paper 77 September 2011 This Discussion Paper reflects the law as at 30 September 2011. © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in whole or part, subject to acknowledgement of the source, for your personal, non- commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), all other rights are reserved. Requests for further authorisation should be directed to the Australia Law Reform Commission. Commission Reference: DP 77 ISBN: 978-0-9871777-0-4 The Australian Law Reform Commission was established on 1 January 1975 by the Law Reform Commission Act 1973 (Cth) and reconstituted by the Australian Law Reform Commission Act 1996 (Cth). The office of the ALRC is at Level 40 MLC, 19 Martin Place, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia. ALRC publications are available to download free of charge or to purchase in hard copy from the ALRC website. If you require assistance, please contact the ALRC. Telephone: within Australia (02) 8238 6333 International +61 2 8238 6333 Facsimile: within Australia (02) 8238 6363 International +61 2 8238 6363 E-mail: [email protected] Homepage: www.alrc.gov.au Making a submission Making a Submission to the Inquiry Any public contribution to an inquiry is called a submission. The Australian Law Reform Commission seeks submissions from a broad cross-section of the community, as well as from those with a special interest in a particular inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Children's Court of Victoria 87.74 Kb
    CORRECTED VERSION LAW REFORM COMMITTEE Inquiry into alternative dispute resolution Melbourne — 10 December 2007 Members Mr C. Brooks Mrs J. Kronberg Mr R. Clark Mr E. O’Donohue Mr L. Donnellan Mr J. Scheffer Mr M. Foley Chair: Mr J. Scheffer Deputy Chair: Mr R. Clark Staff Executive Officer: Ms K. Riseley Research Officers: Ms K. Buchanan and Ms S. Brent Committee Administration Officer: Ms H. Ross-Soden Witness Judge P. Grant, president, Children’s Court of Victoria. 10 December 2007 Law Reform Committee 1 The CHAIR — Welcome, Judge Grant, to our hearing. What we are saying will be recorded, as you know. I do not think it needs any explaining to you that this committee operates under parliamentary privilege, so whatever you say is protected. Judge GRANT — Okay. Thank you. The CHAIR — You may want to reconsider when you go outside the building. We have about an hour, so we will throw it open to you to comment or submit according to our terms of reference, and then we will have a discussion. Thank you. Judge GRANT — Thank you. I have some materials for distribution. I will pass them across to you. This is some material on group conferencing; that is some statistical material that I will refer to. This is a speech I delivered to Youthlaw on the Koori Court. I have made that available, because there are some comments in the discussion paper on the Koori Court. This next document is headed ‘Guidelines for Dispute Resolution Conferences’, which are conferences conducted in the family division of the Children’s Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Lung Capacity Is Key to a Reliable, Peaceful Passing
    Aug-Oct 2014 BREATH TEST WHY LUNG CAPACITY IS KEY TO A RELIABLE, PEACEFUL PASSING Infrequent, but well documented The problems associated withscreening methods, Dr Philip failures of people attempting the hypoxic method centre upon Nitschke has settled on spirometry a peaceful, hypoxic death using whether or not a person can quickly as the most reliable of the predictive nitrogen or helium are explained and efficiently exchange the air in tests. A spirometry test is a simple test in the October 2014 update to The their lungs with the pure nitrogen (or that assess a person’s lung function. Peaceful Pill eHandbook. helium) in the Exit bag. The aim of the spirometry test allows a person to determine whether the In light of a number of reported This rapid exchange of gas for air is Exit bag/ hypoxia method is suitable failed attempts, the October edition necessary in order for there to be a for them. The test is non-invasive, of The Peaceful Pill eHandbook precipitous drop in dissolved oxygen & can be carried out by one’s local update presents a new set of screening level in the blood (PaO2 ), as it passes doctor or physician. criteria. The new guidelines will help from the lungs to the brain. It is this readers decide if the hypoxia/ Exit bag sudden drop in PaO2 that causes the The new guidelines & results of Exit method is for them. In particular, immediate loss of consciousness, testing of optimal lung function it will help those with reduced lung followed quickly by death. capacity requirements are published capacity (eg.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Indigenous Sentencing Courts in Australia 1
    Appendix A: Indigenous Sentencing Courts in Australia State Location/Type Link Western Kalgoorlie-Boulder Community The Kalgoorlie Community Court is a sentencing court designed to be more culturally Australia Court inclusive of Aboriginal people. It is set up in a less formal structure than other courts with the Magistrate sitting at a special table with the other participants including Aboriginal elders, the offender and their family. http://www.magistratescourt.wa.gov.au/K/kalgoorlie_boulder_community_court.aspx?uid =3291-2300-6331-4792 Geraldton Family Violence The Barndimalgu Court hears family and domestic violence matters involving aboriginal Court - Barndimalgu people. This service provides offenders with the opportunity to complete programs to address their violent behaviour before the final sentence is delivered. The project is supported by the Geraldton Aboriginal Justice Agreement which provides a link between the Geraldton Aboriginal Community, the Department of the Attorney General and the Department of Corrective Services http://www.magistratescourt.wa.gov.au/G/geraldton_family_violence_court_barndimalgu. aspx?uid=4497-7800-5232-5352 Victoria Koori court The Koori Court has been created under the Magistrates Court Act 1989. It operates as a division of the Magistrates' Court, which sentences Indigenous defendants. Koori Elders or Respected Persons, the Koori Court Officer, Koori defendants and their families can contribute during the Court hearing. This helps to reduce perceptions of cultural alienation and to ensure sentencing orders are appropriate to the cultural needs of Koori offenders, and assist them to address issues relating to their offending behaviour. The Koori Court is currently located at Bairnsdale, Broadmeadows, Latrobe Valley, Mildura, Shepparton, Swan Hill and Warrnambool Magistrates' Courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Freedom, Self-Directed Dying
    OUR BODIES, OUR LIVES, OUR RIGHT TO DECIDE? REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM, SELF-DIRECTED DYING, AND WOMEN’S AUTONOMY by Ninia Leilani Baehr A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in American Studies MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana November 2017 ©COPYRIGHT by Ninia Leilani Baehr 2017 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I thank the ten veteran reproductive freedom activists whose names, backgrounds, and insights are featured in the final chapter of this dissertation. They trusted me to keep specific confidences and to reflect their views with integrity. This study would not have been possible without their insights. Second, I thank the five members of my dissertation committee: Dr. Mary Murphy (History); Dr. Robert Rydell (History and American Studies); Dr. Kristen Intemann (Philosophy); Dr. Walter Fleming (Native American Studies); and Dr. Elizabeth Rink (Health and Human Development). Between them, they provided valuable guidance, excellent editing advice, and superb examples of accessible writing on a range of academic subjects. Third, I thank the abortion rights pioneers with whom I collected oral histories three decades ago, especially Laura Kaplan. I did not thank Laura publicly when I published my Master’s thesis under the name Abortion without Apology; my information about the Jane Abortion Service came from her, but many former Jane members were still not using their own names because their actions had been illegal. Since then, Laura has published the history of Jane. I now have the opportunity to thank her for introducing me to the radical history of the abortion rights movement years ago, and also for later introducing me to the National Women’s Health Network, where I learned about the reproductive justice model that informs this work.
    [Show full text]
  • County Koori Court
    VICTORIA OF COURT COUNTY COUNTY KOORI COURT This fact sheet is about the County Koori Court – the first Australian sentencing court for Aboriginal offenders in a higher jurisdiction. The County Court of Victoria is the major trial court in Victoria. It is a higher court that sits in the middle of the court hierarchy, above the Magistrates’ Court and below the Supreme Court and the Victorian Court of Appeal (see Fact Sheet 1). WHAT IS THE COUNTY KOORI COURT? WHOSE MATTERS CAN BE HEARD IN THE The County Koori Court is a specialist court that aims to COUNTY KOORI COURT? achieve more participation of the Victorian Aboriginal The County Koori Court is not open to any accused person (Koori) community in the sentencing process in the who is charged with a criminal offence who appears in County Court. It seeks to achieve this through the the County Court. There are certain eligibility criteria. inclusion of Aboriginal Elders or Respected Persons To be eligible for entry into the Koori Court, an accused from the Aboriginal community and Koori Court Officers person must: in the sentencing process in the County Court. ° be Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander; The County Koori Court respects Koori culture and the ° be charged with an offence that can be heard in the processes of the court are less formal than regular County Court; process in the County Court. Legal jargon is avoided and ° be charged with an offence that does not involve family plain English used so that accused people understand violence, a sexual offence or breach of an Intervention the proceedings better and the environment is more Order or Interim Intervention Order; culturally appropriate and sensitive.
    [Show full text]