DOCSLIB.ORG

Terrapene Carolina Carolina) - Version I Nur Ritter West Chester University of Pennsylvania, [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Terrapene Carolina Carolina) - Version I Nur Ritter West Chester University of Pennsylvania, Nritter@Wcupa.Edu West Chester University Digital Commons @ West Chester University Gordon Natural Area Herpetological Studies Gordon Natural Area Herpetological Studies Documents 7-18-2017 Wildlife Usage of Plant Species Utilized by the Eastern Box Turtle (Terrapene carolina carolina) - Version I Nur Ritter West Chester University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcupa.edu/gna_salam_series Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Ritter, N. 2017. Wildlife Usage of Plant Species Utilized by the Eastern Box Turtle (Terrapene carolina carolina) - Version I. 6 pages. Database queried and document created: 7/18/2017. This Dataset is brought to you for free and open access by the Gordon Natural Area Herpetological Studies at Digital Commons @ West Chester University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gordon Natural Area Herpetological Studies Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ West Chester University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wildlife Usage of Plant Species Utilized by the Eastern Box Turtle (Terrapene carolina carolina) - Version I Waterfowl [in general] Mammals [in general] Karner Blue Butterfly PileatedWoodpecker American Woodcock Other Woodpeckers Wildlife [in general] Insects [in general] Eastern Box Turtle Eastern Cottontail Beneficial Insects Birds [in general] Eastern Towhee Brown Thrasher Large Mammals Small Mammals Hummingbirds Deer Other Rabbits Wild Turkeys Wood Ducks Groundhogs Lepidoptera Porcupines Chipmunks Pheasants Opossum Resistant Bobwhite Muskrats Squirrels Raccoon Blue Jay Beetles Grouse Coyote Beaver Flicker Moose Ducks Foxes Bees Owls Flies Bear Deer Mice Ants Taxon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Ambrosia artemisiifolia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Arisaema triphyllum 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Celtis occidentalis 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cornus alternifolia 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Cornus amomum 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 Cornus florida 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Duchesnea indica 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fragaria virginiana 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Galium spp. 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Gaylussacia baccata 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Morus alba 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Morus spp. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Passiflora incarnata 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Passiflora spp. 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phytolacca americana 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Platanus occidentalis 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Podophyllum peltatum 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prunus spp. 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 Prunus serotina 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rosa multiflora 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rubus allegheniensis 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 'Most Important' 'Occasionally' 'Limited Use' 'Rarely' or 'Probably' Utilized - but no finer details given Generally Avoided Page 1 Large Mammals [in general] Small Mammals [in general] Waterfowl [in general] Mammals [in general] Karner Blue Butterfly American Woodcock PileatedWoodpecker Other Woodpeckers Wildlife [in general] Insects [in general] Eastern Box Turtle Eastern Cottontail Beneficial Insects Birds [in general] Eastern Towhee Brown Thrasher Hummingbirds Deer Other Rabbits Wild Turkeys Wood Ducks Groundhogs Lepidoptera Porcupines Chipmunks Pheasants Opossum Resistant Bobwhite Muskrats Squirrels Raccoon Blue Jay Beetles Grouse Coyote Beaver Flicker Moose Ducks Foxes Bees Owls Flies Bear Deer Mice Ants Taxon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rubus occidentalis 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Rubus phoenicolasius 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Rubus spp. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 5 Sambucus canadensis 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vaccinium angustifolium 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Vaccinium pallidum 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vaccinium spp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Checklist of Common Native Plants the Diversity of Acadia National Park Is Refl Ected in Its Plant Life; More Than 1,100 Plant Species Are Found Here
    National Park Service Acadia U.S. Department of the Interior Acadia National Park Checklist of Common Native Plants The diversity of Acadia National Park is refl ected in its plant life; more than 1,100 plant species are found here. This checklist groups the park’s most common plants into the communities where they are typically found. The plant’s growth form is indicated by “t” for trees and “s” for shrubs. To identify unfamiliar plants, consult a fi eld guide or visit the Wild Gardens of Acadia at Sieur de Monts Spring, where more than 400 plants are labeled and displayed in their habitats. All plants within Acadia National Park are protected. Please help protect the park’s fragile beauty by leaving plants in the condition that you fi nd them. Deciduous Woods ash, white t Fraxinus americana maple, mountain t Acer spicatum aspen, big-toothed t Populus grandidentata maple, red t Acer rubrum aspen, trembling t Populus tremuloides maple, striped t Acer pensylvanicum aster, large-leaved Aster macrophyllus maple, sugar t Acer saccharum beech, American t Fagus grandifolia mayfl ower, Canada Maianthemum canadense birch, paper t Betula papyrifera oak, red t Quercus rubra birch, yellow t Betula alleghaniesis pine, white t Pinus strobus blueberry, low sweet s Vaccinium angustifolium pyrola, round-leaved Pyrola americana bunchberry Cornus canadensis sarsaparilla, wild Aralia nudicaulis bush-honeysuckle s Diervilla lonicera saxifrage, early Saxifraga virginiensis cherry, pin t Prunus pensylvanica shadbush or serviceberry s,t Amelanchier spp. cherry, choke t Prunus virginiana Solomon’s seal, false Maianthemum racemosum elder, red-berried or s Sambucus racemosa ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Backgrounder on Black Bears in Ontario June 2009
    iii Backgrounder on Black Bears in Ontario June 2009 Cette publication hautement specialisée Backgrounder on Black Bears in Ontario n’est disponible qu’en Anglais en vertu du Règlement 411/97 qui en exempte l’application de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l’aide en français, veuillez communiquer avec Linda Maguire au ministère des Richesses naturelles au [email protected]. i Backgrounder on Black Bears in Ontario June 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 HISTORIC AND PRESENT IMPORTANCE .................................................................................... 1 Ecological Importance ................................................................................................................... 1 Aboriginal Significance ................................................................................................................. 2 Social Importance .......................................................................................................................... 2 Economic Significance .................................................................................................................. 3 GENERAL ECOLOGY....................................................................................................................... 4 Description....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Vaccinium in North America
    Agriculture Canada The Genus Vaccinium 630 . 4 C212 P 1828 North America 1988 c.2 Agriculture aid Agri-Food Canada/ ^ Agnculturo ^^In^iikQ Canada V ^njaian Agriculture Library Brbliotheque Canadienno de taricakun otur #<4*4 /EWHE D* V /^ AgricultureandAgri-FoodCanada/ '%' Agrrtur^'AgrntataireCanada ^M'an *> Agriculture Library v^^pttawa, Ontano K1A 0C5 ^- ^^f ^ ^OlfWNE D£ W| The Genus Vaccinium in North America S.P.VanderKloet Biology Department Acadia University Wolfville, Nova Scotia Research Branch Agriculture Canada Publication 1828 1988 'Minister of Suppl) andS Canada ivhh .\\ ailabla in Canada through Authorized Hook nta ami other books! or by mail from Canadian Government Publishing Centre Supply and Services Canada Ottawa, Canada K1A0S9 Catalogue No.: A43-1828/1988E ISBN: 0-660-13037-8 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data VanderKloet,S. P. The genus Vaccinium in North America (Publication / Research Branch, Agriculture Canada; 1828) Bibliography: Cat. No.: A43-1828/1988E ISBN: 0-660-13037-8 I. Vaccinium — North America. 2. Vaccinium — North America — Classification. I. Title. II. Canada. Agriculture Canada. Research Branch. III. Series: Publication (Canada. Agriculture Canada). English ; 1828. QK495.E68V3 1988 583'.62 C88-099206-9 Cover illustration Vaccinium oualifolium Smith; watercolor by Lesley R. Bohm. Contract Editor Molly Wolf Staff Editors Sharon Rudnitski Frances Smith ForC.M.Rae Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada - Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada http://www.archive.org/details/genusvacciniuminOOvand
    [Show full text]
  • Factors That Affect Yield in Wild Blueberry, Vaccinium Angustifolium Aiton
    Mini Review Agri Res & Tech: Open Access J Volume 22 Issue 5 - September 2019 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Drummond FA DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2019.22.556212 Factors That Affect Yield in Wild Blueberry, Vaccinium Angustifolium Aiton Drummond FA* School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, USA Submission: September 19, 2019; Published: September 23, 2019 *Corresponding author: Drummond FA, School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, USA Mini Review Wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton), also known also universal mothers (meaning they can accept pollen from as lowbush blueberry is an ericaceous native North American levels of self-compatibility. These self-compatible individuals are any sire and have high levels of fruit set) and because of this have plant that is managed for berry production in the eastern U.S., high yield potential either through self or outcrossed pollination. the Canadian Maritimes and Quebec. The crop is not planted, it Flower number per stem and stems density increase yield if bee is a natural component of the understory in mixed deciduous and coniferous forest and when trees are harvested, existing blueberry increased with fertilization and the height and timing of pruning abundance is adequate. Stem density and flowers per stem can be lab has been studying wild blueberry pollination and other plants are managed to produce agricultural fields [1]. My research factors that affect yield for over 30 years. Figure 1 is a synthesis (early in season). Pollination is a strong determinant of yield Weeds, plant disease, and insect pests can indirectly and directly of our knowledge of factors that affect yield of this native North (in any given year explaining 25-60% of the variance in yield).
    [Show full text]
  • The SP Vander Kloet Vaccinium Collections11 This
    337 REVIEW / SYNTHÈSE Beyond botany to genetic resource preservation: the S.P. Vander Kloet Vaccinium collections1 Kim E. Hummer, Andrew R. Jamieson, and Ruth E. Newell Abstract: Sam P. Vander Kloet, botanist, traveled the world examining and obtaining specimens to redefine infrageneric taxonomic units within Vaccinium L., family Ericaceae. Besides his botanical treatises, his legacy includes herbarium voucher specimens and ex situ genetic resource collections including a seed bank and living plant collections at the Agricul- ture and Agri-Food Canada Research Centre, Kentville, Nova Scotia, Canada; the K.C. Irving Environmental Science Centre and Harriet Irving Botanical Gardens, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada; the Canadian Clonal Genebank, Harrow, Ontario, Canada; and the US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Clonal Germ- plasm Repository, Corvallis, Oregon, United States. Sam P. Vander Kloet’s collections include representatives of wild Erica- ceae with special emphasis on collections of North American and subtropical endemic Vaccinium species. These reference collections are significant and represent a lifetime of dedicated research. Representatives of his heritage collections have now been deposited not only in American genebanks (in Canada and the United States) but also in the World Genebank in Svalbard, Norway, for long term conservation and future evaluation of Vaccinium for the service of humanity. The bequest of his wild collected germplasm will continue to be available to facilitate utilization of an extended Vaccinium gene pool for development and breeding throughout the world. Key words: germplasm conservation, blueberry, genetics, genebanks, plant exploration. Résumé : Sam P. Vander Kloet, botaniste, a voyagé à travers le monde en examinant et obtenant des spécimens pour redéfi- nir les unités taxonomiques infragénériques au sein des Vaccinium L., famille des Ericaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report
    U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park, Maine Project Report Revised Edition – October 2003 Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U. S. Department of the Interior, U. S. Geological Survey. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park, Maine Sara Lubinski and Kevin Hop U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center and Susan Gawler Maine Natural Areas Program This report produced by U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center 2630 Fanta Reed Road La Crosse, Wisconsin 54603 and Maine Natural Areas Program Department of Conservation 159 Hospital Street 93 State House Station Augusta, Maine 04333-0093 In conjunction with Mike Story (NPS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) NPS, Natural Resources Information Division, Inventory and Monitoring Program Karl Brown (USGS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) USGS, Center for Biological Informatics and Revised Edition - October 2003 USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park Contacts U.S. Department of Interior United States Geological Survey - Biological Resources Division Website: http://www.usgs.gov U.S. Geological Survey Center for Biological Informatics P.O. Box 25046 Building 810, Room 8000, MS-302 Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225-0046 Website: http://biology.usgs.gov/cbi Karl Brown USGS Program Coordinator - USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Phone: (303) 202-4240 E-mail: [email protected] Susan Stitt USGS Remote Sensing and Geospatial Technologies Specialist USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Phone: (303) 202-4234 E-mail: [email protected] Kevin Hop Principal Investigator U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments Contributors: Printing was made possible through the generous funding from Adkins Arboretum; Baltimore County Department of Environmental Protection and Resource Management; Chesapeake Bay Trust; Irvine Natural Science Center; Maryland Native Plant Society; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; The Nature Conservancy, Maryland-DC Chapter; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Cape May Plant Materials Center; and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Reviewers: species included in this guide were reviewed by the following authorities regarding native range, appropriateness for use in individual states, and availability in the nursery trade: Rodney Bartgis, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Ashton Berdine, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Chris Firestone, Bureau of Forestry, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Chris Frye, State Botanist, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Mike Hollins, Sylva Native Nursery & Seed Co. William A. McAvoy, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. Mary Pat Rowan, Landscape Architect, Maryland Native Plant Society. Rod Simmons, Maryland Native Plant Society. Alison Sterling, Wildlife Resources Section, West Virginia Department of Natural Resources. Troy Weldy, Associate Botanist, New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Graphic Design and Layout: Laurie Hewitt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Special thanks to: Volunteer Carole Jelich; Christopher F. Miller, Regional Plant Materials Specialist, Natural Resource Conservation Service; and R. Harrison Weigand, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Division for assistance throughout this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Biology of Wild Blueberry (Vaccinium Angustifolium Aiton)
    agriculture Article Reproductive Biology of Wild Blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton) Frank Drummond School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-(207)-581-2989 Received: 7 March 2019; Accepted: 25 March 2019; Published: 30 March 2019 Abstract: Wild blueberry, Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton, is a native forest understory plant that is managed as a fruit crop. Over the past 51 years, experiments have been conducted to investigate its reproduction. A model was developed that predicts bloom to begin at 100◦ days (base 4.4 ◦C) after 1 April and to end at 500◦ days for a period of three to four weeks. Flower stigmas are only receptive to pollen deposition for eight to 10 days, and the rate of fruit set declines rapidly after four days. Placement of pollen upon receptive stigmas suggests that fruit set occurs with as little as a single pollen tetrad. Twelve tetrads result in 50% fruit set. Several years of exploratory fruit set field experiments show viable seeds per berry, which result from pollination with compatible genotype pollen, is associated with larger berry mass (g). Decomposition of the total variance in fruit set shows that stem variation explains 65% to 79% of total variance in the fruit set. To a lesser extent, the field, year, and clone also explain the percent fruit set variation. Variation between stems may be due to variation in the number of flowers. Fruit set tends to decrease as the flower density increases, possibly due to the limitation of pollinators. Keywords: hand pollination; stigma viability; phenology; fruit set; bloom prediction 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Development of the Wild Blueberry Introduction
    Wild Blueberry Fact Sheet A.2.0 Growth and Development of the Wild Blueberry Introduction The wild blueberry plant is native to North America. This plant belongs to the plant genus Vaccinium. There are 5 species of blueberries which grow in the wild in Canada. The most important are: 1. Sour top (Vaccinium myrtilloides Michx). This is primarily a forest species. The species has more branches, and the leaves and stems tend to be more hairy. The plants are generally 15 to 60 cm (6 to 24 inches) tall. It is reported that its density decreases following continuous pruning. This species tends to be more productive in the third year, compared to the "low sweet", which is most productive in the second year after pruning. The fruit is blue and covered with a waxy coating called "bloom". The fruit is not as sweet as the common wild blueberry and referred to as “Sour Top” 2. Wild Low Sweet (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.). This species is the most common in managed fields, and the forest. The plants can reach heights of 7 to 38 cm (3 to 15 inches). The stems are free of hairs. The fruit is sweet, blue and covered with a bloom that gives it a light, powder-blue appearance. This species includes a sub-species called the Black-fruited Low Sweet (Vaccinium angustifolium var. nigrum). It has the same characteristics as the Low Sweet, except that the fruit is black with no waxy coating. 3. Highbush Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). This species can be found in many areas, but tends to prefer wetter sites like the edges of bogs and swamps.
    [Show full text]
  • Productivity and Taxonomy of the Vaccinium Globulare V
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1979 Productivity and taxonomy of the Vaccinium globulare V. membranaceum complex in western Montana Patricia A. Martin The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Martin, Patricia A., "Productivity and taxonomy of the Vaccinium globulare V. membranaceum complex in western Montana" (1979). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 7398. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/7398 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 Th i s is an unpublished m a n u s c r i p t in w h i c h c o p y r i g h t s u b ­ s i s t s . Any FURTHER REPRINTING OF ITS CONTENTS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE AUTHOR. MANSFIELD L ibrary Un i v e r s i t y o f Montjana Da t e : 1 9 7 9 ________ PRODUCTIVITY AND TAXONOMY OF THE VACCINIUM GLOBULARE, V. MEMBRANACEUM COMPLEX IN l\FE STERN MONTANA By Patricia A. E. Martin B.S., University of Montana, 1976 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science University of Montana 1979 Approved by : chairman,jBoard of Examiners Dean, Graduate School y/ 2- Date UMI Number: EP38199 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Signs of the Season 2016-2017 Activity Report
    2016 – 2017 Activity Report Signs of the Seasons: The New England Phenology Program Signs of the Seasons 2017 Activity Report Table of Contents Thank You to Volunteers and Partners ............................................................................ 2 Summary of Volunteer Observations ............................................................................... 3 Program Volunteers ................................................................................................ 3 Active Upland Monitoring Sites ..................................................................................... 4 Active Coastal Monitoring Sites ..................................................................................... 4 Highlights from Volunteer Survey .................................................................................. 5 Data Applications ..................................................................................................... 6 Publications & Other Products from 2016 & 2017 ............................................................... 7 Publications ......................................................................................................... 7 Webinars ............................................................................................................. 8 Goals for 2018 ......................................................................................................... 9 New Indicator Species ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Monographs (Issn:0084-0173)
    Supplement to The Journal of Wildlife Management Vol. 51 No. 2, April 1987 WILDLIFE MONOGRAPHS (ISSN:0084-0173) A Publication of The Wildlife Society EFFECTS OF FOOD SUPPLY AND KINSHIP ON SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, MOVEMENTS, AND POPULATION GROWTH OF BLACK BEARS IN NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA by LYNN L.ROGERS APRIL 1987 NO. 97 The work reported here was funded by WALLACE C. DAYTON; THE SPECIAL PROJECTS FOUNDATION OF THE BIG GAME CLUB; THE USDA FOREST SERVICE, NORTH CENTRAL FOREST EXPERIMENT STATION; THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES; THE USDA FOREST SERVICE, SUPERIOR NATIONAL FOREST; CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS; BIO MEDICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.; THE MAX McGRAW FOUNDATION; THE NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION; THE NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION; THE MINNESOTA STATE ARCHERS ASSOCIATION; THE BOONE AND CROCKETT CLUB; THE AMERICAN FOREST INSTITUTE; THE WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE; THE AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE; HERTER'S INCORPORATED; and CONTRIBUTIONS FROM VARIOUS SCHOOL GROUPS, SPORTSMEN'S ORGANIZATIONS, AND INDIVIDUALS Publication was financed by THE USDA FOREST SERVICE, NORTH CENTRAL FOREST EXPERIMENT STATION WILDLIFE MONOGRAPHS Roy L. Kirkpatrick, Editor Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061 Consulting Editors for this Issue: Michael R. Pelton, Department of Forestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071 Peter Waser, Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 Thelma J. Kirkpatrick Editorial Assistant: The Wildlife Society believes that increased awareness and appreciation of wildlife values is an important objective. Society publications are one means of doing this. Wildlife Monographs was begun in 1957 to provide for longer papers than those normally accepted for The Journal of Wildlife Management.
    [Show full text]