DOCSLIB.ORG

Cover 3 FINAL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cover 3 FINAL The Forum and its Work The Forum (Forum for Policy Dialogue on Water Conflicts in India) is an effort to bring together all those interested in working on issues related to water conflicts in India into a loose network for action and interaction. The Forum began its work towards the end of 2004 as a collaborative effort of a few WATER organisations and independent researchers and was supported by World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). Presently the Forum has more than CONFLICTS 150 organisations and individuals and the present phase of Forum's work is primarily supported by Arghyam Trust, IN Bangalore. The Forum's work covers the four broad areas of conflict documentation, conflict resolution, conflict prevention and network and INDIA outreach. Towards a New Legal Contact Forum for Policy Dialogue on Water and Institutional Framework Conflicts in India c/o Society for Promoting Participative Philippe Cullet, Suhas Paranjape, Himanshu Thakkar, Ecosystem Management M. S. Vani, K. J. Joy, M. K. Ramesh (SOPPECOM) 16, Kale Park, Someshwarwadi Road, Pashan, Pune 411 008 Maharashtra, India Phone: 0091-20-25880786, 25886542 Fax: 0091-20-25886542 Email: [email protected] URL://conflicts.indiawaterportal.org Forum for Policy Dialogue on Water Conflicts in India Water Conflicts In India: Towards a New Legal and Institutional Framework Philippe Cullet, Suhas Paranjape, Himanshu Thakkar, M. S. Vani, K. J. Joy, M. K. Ramesh Forum for Policy Dialogue on Water Conflicts in India March 2012 Water Conflicts In India:Towards a New Legal and Institutional Framework Philippe Cullet, Suhas Paranjape, Himanshu Thakkar, M. S. Vani, K. J. Joy, M. K. Ramesh © Forum for Policy Dialogue on Water Conflicts in India, Pune First published in March 2012 Supported by: ARGHYAM Trust, Bangalore Cover Design and Layout: Marion Jhunja Printed by: Mudra Published by: Forum for Policy Dialogue on Water Conflicts in India, Pune c/o Society for Promoting Participative Ecosystem Management (SOPPECOM) 16, Kale Park, Someshwarwadi Road, Pashan, Pune 411 008 Maharashtra, INDIA Tel: +91-20-2588 0786/ 2588 6542 Fax: +91-020-2588 6542 Email: [email protected] URL: http://conflicts.indiawaterportal.org Copies are available at the above address The contents of this report may be used with due acknowledgement of the source. Any form of reproduction, storage in a retrieval system or transmission by any means requires a prior written permission from the publisher. Citation: Cullet Philippe, Suhas Paranjape, Himanshu Thakkar, M. S. Vani, K. J. Joy, M. K. Ramesh, 2012, Water Conflicts In India: Towards a New Legal and Institutional Framework, Pune: Forum for Policy Dialogue on Water Conflicts in India. Contributory Price : Rs 200/- Contents Acknowledgements pg i Executive Summary pg ii - vi Chapter 1: Introduction pg 1 - 4 Chapter 2: Rivers pg 5 - 30 Chapter 3: Surface Water Bodies pg 31 - 57 Chapter 4: Groundwater pg 58 - 71 Chapter 5: Dams pg 72 - 90 Chapter 6: Issues and Way Forward pg 91 - 107 Acknowledgements On behalf of the Forum for Policy Dialogue on Water Conflicts in India (Forum) we would like to thank all those who have contributed to the preparation and production of this report Water Conflicts in India: Towards a New Legal and Institutional Framework. First of all we are thankful to the members of the working group set up by the Forum on Legal and Institutional Issues Related to Water Governance and Conflict Resolution - Philippe Cullet, Suhas Paranjape, Himanshu Thakkar, M. S. Vani, and M. K. Ramesh - for first agreeing to be part of this working group and then taking time off to write the various chapters. They also tried to engage with the comments and suggestions they received from the participants of the two national workshops held in March 2009 and February 2010 at Pune. We also acknowledge the critical feedback provided by the members of the first working group on Water Entitlements and Allocations for Livelihoods and Ecosystem Needs consisting of K. J. Joy, Priya Sangameswaran, A. Latha, Shripad Dharmadhikary, M. K. Prasad and K. P. Soma. The report has been greatly enriched by the deliberations of the two national workshops held in March 2009 and February 2010. The first workshop helped to define the contours of these two themes of Entitlements and Allocations for Livelihoods and Ecosystem Needs and Legal and Institutional Issues Related to Conflict Resolution. In the second workshop the draft reports/outlines were presented for a critical feedback. A special thanks to all the participants of both these workshops. We appreciate the support we have received from the members of the Steering Committee and Advisory Committee and we do count on their support in taking this report forward. We would like to acknowledge the financial support and encouragement provided by Arghyam Trust, Bangalore. In fact the second phase of the work of the Forum is primarily supported by Arghyam. We thank Marion Jhunja for the cover and lay out of the report and Mudra for its production. We are also grateful to all our colleagues in SOPPECOM for their help in bringing out this report. It would not have been possible to bring this report out without the efforts put in at different levels by, our colleague in the Forum and SOPPECOM, Shruti Vispute. A big thanks to her. K. J. Joy and Suhas Paranjape Forum for Policy Dialogue on Water Conflicts in India i Executive Summary Context The work of the Forum during the last five to six years has very clearly led to an understanding that the existing legal framework around water does not have much to offer in terms of resolution and prevention of water conflicts. There is a need to change this framework so that it becomes an instrument of conflict resolution and prevention. This concern about the inadequacy of the legal regime around water stems from many quarters. For example, it is widely believed that the present legal system is not informed of its bio-physical and socio-cultural peculiarities as a resource. Similarly, the laws do not recognise water as a common pool and ecosystem resource. The laws are mostly based on the premise that water is classical private property, which it is not. The water sector is also confronted with new issues and challenges, especially after the 1990s. There is an increasing awareness of the multifaceted crisis surrounding water in the sector, including the fear that our water resources may not be able to meet the needs of our growing population. This is also giving rise to different types of conflicts, especially around the issues of access and allocation. The demand to make the right to water a constitutional night is also gaining ground, especially because there is a fear that the resource poor might get priced out of the system with the type of reforms taking place in the water sector, especially privatisation of different types. The preoccupation with an 8 to 9% growth rate with industrialisation as its main engine is also taking a toll on water. Increasing levels of pollution and inter-sectoral water conflicts mainly because of the diversion of water from agriculture to industry are symptoms of this trend. The changing role of the state from that of service provider to regulator, and the institutional changes in the form of Water Users’ Associations (WUAs) and independent regulatory mechanisms, are also part of this new set of issues and concerns. Such issues have contributed to the widespread belief that the legal and institutional regimes governing the water sector need to be overhauled. What should be the broad direction of this change? What can the Forum do in this regard? This prompted the Forum to decide to engage with these issues on a long term basis, and as a first step, to constitute a small working group to go into these issues and come up with a report that would indicate the broad direction of the required changes. The main insights from the different chapters of the report are presented below. Rivers The existing legal and institutional structures that affect rivers in India have proved to be ineffective in protecting rivers from being polluted. When rivers have been protected in rare instances, it has been achieved through social and community initiatives that have often bypassed these established structures. In the decision ii making processes, there is no attempt at valuing the services provided by a river, either in qualitative or quantitative terms. Rivers face many existential threats, including due to dams (including run of river and other hydropower projects), pollution, diversions, encroachments, and excessive use of groundwater and catchment degradation. The newer threats that rivers face include privatisation, climate change and river linking plans. The current National Water Policy (2002) and its revision under consideration the Draft National Water Policy 2012, as well as the various state water policies have very few river-friendly elements, and are also marked by a complete absence of legal and institutional mechanisms to ensure implementation of river- friendly aspects of the policy. What is needed is an enabling legal and institutional framework conducive to an equitable, sustainable and just resolution of water conflicts in the context of rivers. Some of its key elements may be enumerated as follows: a national rivers policy, river zone regulation, floodplain protection, catchment management, protection of local water systems, wetland and forests, ensuring freshwater flow in perennial rivers even from existing dams, hydropower projects and diversions and also from such future projects, a credible community managed pollution control regime, ensuring natural flow in selected rivers, and credible redressal and compliance mechanisms, among others. Groundwater The role of groundwater in water provisioning has been increasing and, more importantly, has now come to play a crucial role in drinking water provision.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Central Plan 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A. 4055 Capital Outlay on Police
    161 13: DETAILED STATEMENT OF CAPITAL EXPENDITURE Figures in italics represent charged expenditure Nature of Expenditure Expenditure Expenditure during 2010-11 Expenditure Upto % Increase during 2009-10 Non PlanPlan Total 2010-11 (+) / Decrease (-) State Plan Centrally during the sponsored year Scheme/ Central Plan 1 234 5 6 78 ( ` In lakh) A. Capital Account of General Services- 4055 Capital Outlay on Police- 207 State Police- Construction- Police Station 23,66.57 .. 77,01,30 .. 77,01,30 2,06,37.40 2,25,42 Office Building 21,33.43 .. 13,88.70 .. 13,88.70 98,16,10 -34.91 Other schemes each costing ` five crore and .. .. .. .. .. 76,74.15 .. less Total-207 45,00.00 .. 90,90.00 .. 90,90.00 3,81,27.65 1,02.00 211 Police Housing- Construction- (i) Investment--Investment in Police Housing .. .. .. .. .. 69,82.16 .. Corporation. (ii) Other Old Projects .. .. .. .. .. 5,86.47 .. (iii) Other schemes each costing ` five crore and .. .. .. .. .. 12,30.22 .. less Total-211 .. .. .. .. .. 87,98.85 .. Total-4055 45,00.00 .. 90,90.00 .. 90,90.00 4,69,26.50 1,02.00 4058 Capital Outlay on Stationery and Printing- 103 Government Presses- (i) Machinery and Equipments .. .. .. .. .. 7,23.78 .. (ii) Printing and Stationery 7.49 .. 5.60 .. 5.60 36.94 .. 162 13: DETAILED STATEMENT OF CAPITAL EXPENDITURE-contd. Figures in italics represent charged expenditure Nature of Expenditure Expenditure Expenditure during 2010-11 Expenditure Upto % Increase during 2009-10 Non PlanPlan Total 2010-11 (+) / Decrease (-) State Plan Centrally during the sponsored year Scheme/ Central Plan 1 234 5 6 78 ( ` In lakh) A.
    [Show full text]
  • 4055 Capital Outlay on Police
    100 9 STATEMENT NO. 13-DETAILED STATEMENT OF Expenditure Heads(Capital Account) Nature of Expenditure 1 A. Capital Account of General Services- 4055 Capital Outlay on Police- 207 State Police- Construction- Police Station Office Building Schemes each costing Rs.one crore and less Total - 207 211 Police Housing- Construction- (i) Construction of 234 Constables Barracks in Policelines at Faridabad. (ii) Construction of Police Barracks in Police Station at Faridabad. (iii) Construction of Police Houses for Government Employees in General Pool at Hisar. (iv) Construction of Houses of Various Categories for H.A.P. at Madhuban . (v) Investment--Investment in Police Housing Corporation. (vi) Construction of Police Houses at Kurukshetra,Sonepat, and Sirsa. (vii) Other Schemes each costing Rs.one crore and less Total - 211 Total - 4055 4058 Capital Outlay on Stationery and Printing- 103 Government Presses- (i) Machinery and Equipments (ii) Printing and Stationery (iii) Extension of Government Press at Panchkula Total - 103 Total - 4058 4059 Capital Outlay on Public Works- 01 Office Buildings- 051 Construction- (i) Construction of Mini Secretariat at Fatehabad (ii) Construction of Mini Secretariat at Jhajjar (iii) Construction of Mini Secretariat at Panchkula (iv) Construction of Mini Secretariat at Yamuna Nagar (v) Construction of Mini Secretariat at Kaithal (vi) Construction of Mini Secretariat at Rewari (vii) Construction of Mini Secretariat at Faridabad (viii) Construction of Mini Secretariat at Bhiwani (ix) Construction of Mini Secretariat at Narnaul (x) Construction of Mini Secretariat at Jind (xi) Construction of Mini Secretariat at Sirsa (xii) Construction of Mini Secretariat at Hisar 101 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE DURING AND TO END OF THE YEAR 2008-2009 Expenditure during 2008-2009 Non-Plan Plan Centrally Sponsered Total Expenditure to Schemes(including end of 2008-2009 Central Plan Schemes) 23 4 5 6 (In thousands of rupees) .
    [Show full text]
  • Current Condition of the Yamuna River - an Overview of Flow, Pollution Load and Human Use
    Current condition of the Yamuna River - an overview of flow, pollution load and human use Deepshikha Sharma and Arun Kansal, TERI University Introduction Yamuna is the sub-basin of the Ganga river system. Out of the total catchment’s area of 861404 sq km of the Ganga basin, the Yamuna River and its catchment together contribute to a total of 345848 sq. km area which 40.14% of total Ganga River Basin (CPCB, 1980-81; CPCB, 1982-83). It is a large basin covering seven Indian states. The river water is used for both abstractive and in stream uses like irrigation, domestic water supply, industrial etc. It has been subjected to over exploitation, both in quantity and quality. Given that a large population is dependent on the river, it is of significance to preserve its water quality. The river is polluted by both point and non-point sources, where National Capital Territory (NCT) – Delhi is the major contributor, followed by Agra and Mathura. Approximately, 85% of the total pollution is from domestic source. The condition deteriorates further due to significant water abstraction which reduces the dilution capacity of the river. The stretch between Wazirabad barrage and Chambal river confluence is critically polluted and 22km of Delhi stretch is the maximum polluted amongst all. In order to restore the quality of river, the Government of India (GoI) initiated the Yamuna Action Plan (YAP) in the1993and later YAPII in the year 2004 (CPCB, 2006-07). Yamuna river basin River Yamuna (Figure 1) is the largest tributary of the River Ganga. The main stream of the river Yamuna originates from the Yamunotri glacier near Bandar Punch (38o 59' N 78o 27' E) in the Mussourie range of the lower Himalayas at an elevation of about 6320 meter above mean sea level in the district Uttarkashi (Uttranchal).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Brink: Water Governance in the Yamuna River Basin in Haryana By
    Water Governance in the Yamuna River Basin in Haryana August 2010 For copies and further information, please contact: PEACE Institute Charitable Trust 178-F, Pocket – 4, Mayur Vihar, Phase I, Delhi – 110 091, India Society for Promotion of Wastelands Development PEACE Institute Charitable Trust P : 91-11-22719005; E : [email protected]; W: www.peaceinst.org Published by PEACE Institute Charitable Trust 178-F, Pocket – 4, Mayur Vihar – I, Delhi – 110 091, INDIA Telefax: 91-11-22719005 Email: [email protected] Web: www.peaceinst.org First Edition, August 2010 © PEACE Institute Charitable Trust Funded by Society for Promotion of Wastelands Development (SPWD) under a Sir Dorabji Tata Trust supported Water Governance Project 14-A, Vishnu Digambar Marg, New Delhi – 110 002, INDIA Phone: 91-11-23236440 Email: [email protected] Web: www.watergovernanceindia.org Designed & Printed by: Kriti Communications Disclaimer PEACE Institute Charitable Trust and Society for Promotion of Wastelands Development (SPWD) cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in this report. All rights reserved. Information contained in this report may be used freely with due acknowledgement. When I am, U r fine. When I am not, U panic ! When I get frail and sick, U care not ? (I – water) – Manoj Misra This publication is a joint effort of: Amita Bhaduri, Bhim, Hardeep Singh, Manoj Misra, Pushp Jain, Prem Prakash Bhardwaj & All participants at the workshop on ‘Water Governance in Yamuna Basin’ held at Panipat (Haryana) on 26 July 2010 On the Brink... Water Governance in the Yamuna River Basin in Haryana i Acknowledgement The roots of this study lie in our research and advocacy work for the river Yamuna under a civil society campaign called ‘Yamuna Jiye Abhiyaan’ which has been an ongoing process for the last three and a half years.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Riverriver
    Reviving River Yamuna An Actionable Blue Print for a BLUEBLUE RIVERRIVER Edited by PEACE Institute Charitable Trust H.S. Panwar 2009 Reviving River Yamuna An Actionable Blue Print for a BLUE RIVER Edited by H.S. Panwar PEACE Institute Charitable Trust 2009 contents ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................... v PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................... vii CHAPTER 1 Fact File of Yamuna ................................................................................................. 9 A report by CHAPTER 2 Diversion and over Abstraction of Water from the River .............................. 15 PEACE Institute Charitable Trust CHAPTER 3 Unbridled Pollution ................................................................................................ 25 CHAPTER 4 Rampant Encroachment in Flood Plains ............................................................ 29 CHAPTER 5 There is Hope for Yamuna – An Actionable Blue Print for Revival ............ 33 This report is one of the outputs from the Ford Foundation sponsored project titled CHAPTER 6 Yamuna Jiye Abhiyaan - An Example of Civil Society Action .......................... 39 Mainstreaming the river as a popular civil action ‘cause’ through “motivating actions for the revival of the people – river close links as a precursor to citizen’s mandated actions for the revival
    [Show full text]
  • Pollution Study of River Yamuna: the Delhi Story
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2015): 78.96 | Impact Factor (2015): 6.391 Pollution Study of River Yamuna: The Delhi Story Keshav Sharma School of Civil and Chemical Engineering, VIT University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu Abstract: Water pollution may be defined as the presence of one or more contaminants or combinations thereof in such quantities and of such durations in the water tend to be injurious to human, animal or plant life,(aquatic life) or property, or which unreasonably interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property. In easier words, it is the contamination of water bodies like lakes, rivers, ponds, seas, oceans and even groundwater. This is due to discharge of environmental pollutants or effluents into water bodies without treatment. Water pollution affects the entire biosphere, including not only the individual species but also their natural biological communities. It results in the death of much of the aquatic life residing inside the contaminated water body. It also leads to various diseases like cholera, dysentery, diarrhea, malaria, dengue, chickingunia, etc. and even fatal in some cases if that water is consumed without treatment. Keywords: Water pollution, Delhi Segment, Yamuna, Treatment, Aquatic life, Tajewala Barrage, Confluence, Tributary, BOD, COD, DO 1. Introduction Eutrophicated Segmentand the Diluted Segment are the respective five segments River Yamuna or Jamuna is the longest and second largest tributary of river Ganga in northern India. It originates from A. The Himalayan Segment Yamunotri glacier at a height of 6,387 metres (20,955 feet) The Himalayan Segment, covering 172 kilometres(107 on the south western slopes of Banderpooch peaks in the miles), lies between the YamunotriGlacier (Uttarakhand) uppermost region of the lower Himalayas in the state of and Tajewala/Hathnikund Barrage (Haryana).
    [Show full text]
  • India Western Yamuna Canal Hydroelectric Project (ID-P7)
    India Western Yamuna Canal Hydroelectric Project (ID-P7) Evaluator: Akihiro Nakagome, Hiromi Suzuki, S. Field Survey: October 2006/February 2007 1. Project Profile and Japan’s ODA Loan China Nepal New Delhi Bhutan Project site Bangladesh Myanmar India Map of project area Control room 1.1 Background Haryana, a state in northern India, was, until 1966, part of the state of Punjab. It has a population of about 22 million (70% of which is rural), an area of 44,212 km2 (or 1% of the total area of India), and most of the land is flat. It is bounded by Punjab and Himachal Pradesh in the north, Rajasthan in the southwest, and Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh in the east bordering the Yamuna River. In 1993, when it accounted for 42.5% of Haryana’s GDP, agriculture was still the linchpin of the state economy, but in 2004, it dropped to 28.2%. In the meantime, the industry’s contribution to the state economy remained at the 26–27% mark in 2004, while the service industry’s contribution increased to 140%. This change in the industrial structure of India is manifested in the trend in electricity consumption by sector. The percentage of total electricity consumption that agriculture accounts for peaked in FY2000 and has been on the decline ever since. By contrast, the percentage of total electricity consumption attributed to the industrial sector has been rising at a rate of around 36% from FY2000 to FY2004; therefore, the supply and demand of electric power has remained stringent. In addition, given that the state of Haryana has hammered out a policy of strengthening the manufacturing and service industries, it can be seen that the development of new power sources and enhancement of power generating efficiency will continue to be important issues in the months and years to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Haryana-Gk-In-English-By-Naukri
    20. What was the capital of Kuru clan, which was Important Haryana GK among the 16 Mahajanapadas, during Mahabharata period- Indraprastha One Liner in Hindi 21. Which of following was the Capital of Kuru Mahajanapada during Mahabharata period- 1. Haryana was earlier knows as: Brahmavart Hastinapur 2. The social and political life of Haryana state is 22. Coins of Yaudheya clan have been discovered at mentioned in which historical text- Brahmana which place of Haryana- Saharanpur and Texts, Rigveda Sonipat 3. The famous religious book/text of 23. What was the capital of Agar Republican state- “Mahabharata” was written in which district of Agroha Haryana- Kurukshetra 24. Maharaja Agrasena was associated with which 4. Haryana was known by which name during place- Agroha Yaudhayea Period- Bhaudhanyaka 25. Vadhana dynasty was founded at which place of 5. Rohtak district got its mention in which Haryana- Thanesar historical text- Nakula – Digvijyams 26. Thanesar was the capital of which famous ruler- 6. Which city of Haryana is associated with Karna Harshavardhana of Mahabharata- Karnal 27. The book written by the Chinese traveler depicts 7. Agroha (Hisar) is mentioned in which texts- power and glory of which place of Haryana- Divyavdan Thanesar 8. All the seven notes of musc have been 28. Mihira Bhoj, was a famous ruler of which among mentioned in the inscription iwhich has been the following dynasties- Gurjara – Pratihara found at which place of Haryana- Agroha dynasty 9. Rakhigarhi, A Haryana civilization place is 29. Sthanishvara was the ancient name of- located in which of the following district of kurukshetra Haryana- Hisar 30.
    [Show full text]
  • Assorted Dimensions of Socio-Economic Factors of Haryana
    ISSN (Online) : 2348 - 2001 International Refereed Journal of Reviews and Research Volume 6 Issue 6 November 2018 International Manuscript ID : 23482001V6I6112018-08 (Approved and Registered with Govt. of India) Assorted Dimensions of Socio-Economic Factors of Haryana Nisha Research Scholar Department of Geography Sri Venkateshwara University, Uttar Pradesh, India Dr. Avneesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of Geography Sri Venkateshwara University Uttar Pradesh, India Abstract It was carved out of the former state of East Punjab on 1 November 1966 on a linguistic basis. It is ranked 22nd in terms of area, with less than 1.4% (44,212 km2 or 17,070 sq mi) of India's land area. Chandigarh is the state capital, Faridabad in National Capital Region is the most populous city of the state, and Gurugram is a leading financial hub of the NCR, with major Fortune 500 companies located in it. Haryana has 6 administrative divisions, 22 districts, 72 sub-divisions, 93 revenue tehsils, 50 sub-tehsils, 140 community development blocks, 154 cities and towns, 6,848 villages, and 6222 villages panchayats. As the largest recipient of investment per capita since 2000 in India, and one of the wealthiest and most economically developed regions in South Asia, Registered with Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Govt. of India URL: irjrr.com ISSN (Online) : 2348 - 2001 International Refereed Journal of Reviews and Research Volume 6 Issue 6 November 2018 International Manuscript ID : 23482001V6I6112018-08 (Approved and Registered with Govt. of India) Haryana has the fifth highest per capita income among Indian states and territories, more than double the national average for year 2018–19.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of Haryana Finance Accounts 2008-2009
    GOVERNMENT OF HARYANA FINANCE ACCOUNTS 2008-2009 (i) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) CERTIFICATE OF THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA (iii) INTRODUCTORY 1-2 PART I - SUMMARISED STATEMENTS Statement No. 1 Summary of transactions 4-33 Statement No. 2 Capital Outlay Outside the Revenue Account-Progressive capital outlay to end of 2008 - 2009 34-39 Statement No. 3 Financial results of irrigation works 40-42 Statement No. 4 Debt position - (i) Statement of borrowings 43-44 (ii) Other obligations 45 (iii) Service of debt 46 Statement No. 5 Loans and advances by the State Government - (i) Statement of loans and advances 47 (ii) Recoveries in arrears 48-49 Statement No. 6 Guarantees given by the Government of Haryana in respect of loans etc. raised by statutory corporations, Government companies, local bodies and other institutions 50-51 Statement No. 7 Cash balance and investments of cash balances 52-53 Statement No. 8 Summary of balances under Consolidated Fund, Contingency Fund and Public Account 54-55 Notes to Accounts 56-58 PART II - DETAILED ACCOUNTS AND OTHER STATEMENTS A- Revenue and Expenditure Statement No. 9 Statement of revenue and expenditure for the year 2008-2009 under different heads expressed as a percentage of total revenue/total expenditure 60-63 Statement No. 10 Statement showing the distribution between charged and voted expenditure 64 Statement No. 11 Detailed account of revenue receipts and capital receipts by minor heads 65-76 Statement No. 12 Detailed account of Revenue Expenditure by Minor Heads and Capital Expenditure by Major Heads 77-99 Statement No. 13 Detailed statement of capital expenditure during and to end of the year 2008 - 2009 100-169 (ii) TABLE OF CONTENTS - concld.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Instruments on Rivers in India (Vol – Iii) Agreements on Inter State Rivers Part One
    FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY LEGAL INSTRUMENTS ON RIVERS IN INDIA (VOL – III) AGREEMENTS ON INTER STATE RIVERS PART ONE CENTRAL WATER COMMISSION INTER STATE MATTERS DIRECTORATE NEW DELHI October, 2015 S. No CONTENTS Page INDUS BASIN 1-114 1 Draft agreement between the British Government and the Bikaner 1-7 State regarding the Northern and Southern Ghaggar canals as adopted at a conference held at Simla on 27th May, 1897 2 Terms of agreement subject to the confirmation of the Secretary of 8-13 State in Council between the British Government and the Government of His Highness the Nawab of Bahawalpur and His Highness the Maharaja of Bikaner regarding the irrigation of the tracts commanded and economically irrigable from the Gharra reach of the Sutlej river and from the Panjnad reach of the Chenab river 3 Agreement between the Secretary of State for India in Council and 14-18 Lieutenant His Highness Raja Joginder Sen Bahadur, Raja of Mandi. 4 First Supplemental Agreement regarding supply of energy in Mandi 19-20 town 5 Agreement between East Punjab Government and the Government 21-30 of Patiala and East Punjab States Union (PEPSU) regarding Sirhind canal and distribution of supplies 6 Agreement on Constitution of the Bhakra Control Board and Bhakra 31-34 Advisory Board 7 Record of the decisions arrived at the inter-state conference on the 35 development and utilisation of the waters of the rivers Ravi and Beas held in room no. 12 North Block, New Delhi on the 29th January, 1955. 8 Record of the decisions taken at the inter-state meeting of the Chief 36-38 Engineers on the development and utilisation of the waters of the rivers Ravi and Beas held in room no.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of Haryana Revenue & Disaster Management Department
    Government of Haryana Revenue & Disaster Management Department DISTRICT DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN FARIDABAD 2017 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 History .............................................................................................................................................1 1.2 General Information .........................................................................................................................1 1.3 Administration .................................................................................................................................1 1.4 Location ...........................................................................................................................................2 1.5 Area..................................................................................................................................................2 1.6 Topography ......................................................................................................................................2 1.7 Drainage ...........................................................................................................................................2 1.8 Soil ...................................................................................................................................................2 1.9 Ground Water...................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]