Canada Paper No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Canada Paper No ,. NATIONAL MUSEUM OF MAN MUSEE NATIONAL DE L'HOMME MERCURY SERIES COLLECTION MERCURE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY COMMISSION ARCHEOLOGIQUE OF CANADA PAPER NO. 131 DU CANADA DOSSIER N° 131 Effects of Nineteenth Century European Exploration on the Development of the Netsilik lnuit Culture by James M. Savelle -Reprinted from: THE FRANKLIN ERA IN CANADIAN ARCTIC HISTORY 1845 - 1859 Edited by Patricia D. Sutherland v y ¥ ? --<.- '~~~~~jlljl 'I' -~I\ l z-~~ .~~ ~ ~ -- -*- National Museums Musees nationaux I ...,.. of Canada du Canada Canada OTTAWA 1985 Courtesy Public Archives of Canada(C-1352) Not here: the white north hath thy bones, and thou Heroic Sailor Soul Art Passing on thy happier voyage now Toward no earthly pole. Alfred, Lord T enn~'lSon Epitaph !or Sir clohn Franklin ii EFFECTS OF NINETEENTH CENTtTHY EUROPEAN EXPLORATION ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NETSILIK INUIT CtTLTtTRE JamesM. Savelle Department of Anthropology, University of Alberta Abstract Nineteenth century European exploration in the BoothiaPeninsula-KingWilliamIsland-Adelaide Peninsula region resulted in little sustained direct contact with indigenous Netsilik Inuit, and the impact of direct explorerilnuit interaction on cultural developmentwas relatively minor. The abandonment of the Vict,-jr~) and associated materials in Lor-dMayor Bay in 1832 by John Ross, and the abandonment of the Erebus and Terr,-j]' and associated materials in the King William Island region by surviving membersof the Sir John Franklin expedition in 1848, however, introduced vast quantities of potentially saIvable rare and exotic materials such as iron, copper, tin and wood.Recent archaeologicalinvestigations and museumresearch designed to determine the nature and extent of the post-abandonment utilization of this material are discussed. Whileconfirming previous reports of substantial utilization, the results, when int~grated with relevant data from ethnohistorical literature, also suggest that this utilization resulted in significant changes in intra- and intergroup relationships. R~sum~ L'exploration europeenne dans la region de la presqu'l1e de Boothia, de l'l1e King William et de la presqu'iJe Adelaide au Xme siec!e n'entraina que peu de contacts directs soutenus avec les lnuit Netsilik, et l'incidence de contacts directs entre les explorateurs et les lnuit sur le developpement culturel fut relativement faible. L'abandon par John Ross du Victor~) et de son materiel en 1832 dans la hie Lord Mayor, et l'abandon en 1848 de I'Erebus et du T eJ"J"{.jret de leur materiel dans la region de l'l1e King William par les membres survivants de l'expedition de Sir John Franklin, introduisit toutefois de vastes quantites de materiaux rares et exotiques pouvant etre recuperes, notamment du fer, du cuivre, de l'etain et du bois. Il est question de proceder a des fouilles archeologiques et a des recherches museologiquesen vue de determiner la nature et l'importance de l'utilisation de ces objets apres leur abandon. Tout en confirmant des rapports anterieurs evoquant une utilisation substantielle, les resultats, si on les integre aux donnees pertinentes des ouvrages ethno-historiques, sugg~rent une utilisation qui entraina des changements importants dans les relations entre les groupes, et a l'interieur de ces derniers. 192 EUROPEAN EXPLORATION AND NETSELIK INUIT CULTURE Introduction: of the North-west Passage -- the first In recent years, ethnohistorical and ethnographic study was conducted by Knud archaeological research has shown that Rasmussen in 1923 (Rasmussen 1927, 1931). European contact, either directly or More recent studies include those by Balikci indirectly, had significantly altered many (1964, 1970, 1984) and Damas (1968, 1969). Canadian Inuit societies prior to the first During the century prior to Rasmussen's detailed ethnographic studies relating to investigations, a number of European and them (e.g. Ross 1975,1980,Jordan and Kaplan Euroamerican expeditions had entered the 1980; Hickey 1984; see also Trigger 1981). area (Table i), and although several had These studies have important implications direct contact with indigenous Inuit groups, since such. societies, as first described by the effects on cultural development appear ethnographers, have come to occupy a to have been minimal. Indirect contact, unique place in anthropological literature however, in the form of the introduction ~ as representative of "pristine" Inuit culture. of large quantities of rare and exotic As a result, they have figured prominently mati!rials such as iron, copper, tin and wood in acculturation studies, cross-cultural following the abandonment of ships and comparisons, and in general models of large caches, appears to have had hunter-gatherer societies. considerable impact. Two expeditions are of For Inuit groups inhabiting the Boothia particular importance in this regard: that Peninsula, King William Island and Adelaide of John Ross in 1829-33, and that of Sir Peninsula region -- the central "link" John Franklin in 1845-48. Table 1: Expeditions into the Boothia Peninsula-King William Island-Adelaide Peninsula region between 1829 and 1923. E:xpedition Leader<.s) Date Reference Ross 1829-33 Ross1835,Huish1835 Back 1833-35 Back1836,King1836 DeaseandSimpson 1837-39 Simpson1843 Franklin 1845-48 Cvriax 1939 Rae 1846-47 Rae1850 Rae 1853-54 Rae1855 AndersonandStewart 1855 Anderson1856,1857 HcClintock 1857-59 HcClintock1859 Hall 1864-69 Nourse1879 Schwatka 1878-80 Gilder1881,Stackpole1965 Amundsen 1903-06 Amundsen1908 Rasmussen 1921-24 Rasmussen1927,1931 193 VICTORIA ~. BOOTH lA ISLAND PENINSULA FRANKLlN ~ ROSS 1848 .. 1832 ~ IS) ~. 0 ., .. d '<t 0- 'u ..... MELVILLE \ PENINSULA 0 km 200 (iI ..:I ..:I (iI :> ~ (J) Figure 1: Locations of abandoned ships (triangles) and other materials (hexagons) from ~ ItI the expeditions of John Ross (1829-33) and Sir John Franklin (1845-48) in the central (iI Canadian Arctic. X ~ '"J EUROPEAN EXPLORATION AND NETSELII< INUIT CULTURE The Ross expedition spent three years, In 1848,16 years after the abandonment 1829-32, in the Lord Mayor Bay area on the of the Victo~) and associated materials, the east coast of Boothia Peninsula. Ross had Erebus and Terror were abandoned considerable difficulty with the steam northwest of King William Island by the engine of the expedition ship Victo~), and survi ving members of the Franklin ex- abandoned most parts of the engine at Felix pedition. Probably by no later than the Harbour in 1830. The expedition spent the autumn of the same year, ships' boats, first winter at Felix Harbour, the second various supplies, and ultimately human winter at Sheriff Harbour (approximately corpses, were scattered along the west and 5 kilometers to the northeast), and the south coasts of King William Island and third winter at Victoria Harbour (app- along the north coast of Adelaide Peninsula. roximately 20 kilometers northeast of At least one of the abandoned ships app- Sheriff Harbour. The Victo~) itself, along arently drifted to the vicinity of O'Reilly with a smaller launch, the Krusenstern, and Island. a stores depot, were abandoned at Victoria Harbour in 1832. Ross spent the fourth The locations of abandoned ships and winter of the expedition at Fury Beach on known or probable locations of substantial Somerset Island, and was finally rescued by quantities of other abandoned materials the whaler lsabella in August 1833 north from the Ross and Franklin expeditions are of Baffin Island. shown in Figure 1. The remainder of this Figure 2: Remains of Victo~'s engine parts on McDiarmid's Island, Felix Harbour. 195 J AMES M. SA VELLE paper will briefly describe recent arch- source of iron. Evidence of Inuit "quarrying" aeological and museum research which was or "mining" of the iron is considerable, with designed to determine the effects of the substantial quantities of debris resulting introduction of this abandoned material on from hammering and chipping of the the indigenous Inuit groups, in particular material occurring in association (Figure 4). the Netsilik Inuit, and will summarize the results of these investigations. Victoria Harbour: Ross abandoned the Victor~ while it was frozen in the ice in the harbour, but left the Krusenstern and Archaeological Investigations various stores well up on the shore of the Archaeological investigations in north side of the harbour (Ross 1835:641, connection with the project were conducted PI. 26). In addition, a number of scientific in 1980, 1981 and 1982. The 1980 field instruments were concealed in a "tunnel" research concentrated primarily on foot (trench?), possibly on the north shore of and helicopter surveys of selected areas of the harbour (Ross 1835: 643) or in a series ~ Somerset and Prince of Wales islands and of stone caches (Huish 1835). The Victor:; neigh boring smaller islands, in an attempt apparently remained in the harbour for two to determine the nature and extent of years following its subsequent discovery by nineteenth century Inuit occupations in the Netsilik Inuit (Gibson 1929). region and the relationships of such Victoria Harbour has been a popular occupations to European exploration. The collecting locality for Arctic history results suggested that such occupations enthusiasts for a number of years, and were very restricted and that nineteenth consequently the original patterns of debris century European presence in this area, distribution are difficult to determine. both direct and indirect, elicited little However, judging from other collections response from the Netsilik Inuit to the examined
Recommended publications
  • Statutory Report on Wildlife to the Nunavut Legislative Assembly Section 176 of the Wildlife Act
    Statutory Report on Wildlife to the Nunavut Legislative Assembly Section 176 of the Wildlife Act 1.0 Review of Wildlife and Habitat Management Programs for Terrestrial Species in Nunavut…………………………………………………………….1 1.1 Wildlife Act and Wildlife Regulations………………………………………………..2 1.2 Qikiqtaaluk Region……………………………………………………………………2 1.2.1 Qikiqtaaluk Research Initiatives…………………………………………………….2 a. Peary caribou………………………………………………………………………….2 b. High Arctic muskox…………………………………………………………………...3 c. North Baffin caribou…………………………………………………………………..4 1.2.2 Qikiqtaaluk Management Initiatives………………………………………………...5 a. Peary Caribou Management Plan……………………………………………………...5 b. High Arctic Muskox…………………………………………………………………..5 c. South Baffin Management Plan……………………………………………………….6 1.3 Kitikmeot Region……………………………………………………………………...8 1.3.1 Kitikmeot Research Initiatives………………………………………………………9 a. Wolverine and Grizzly bear Hair Snagging………………………………………….. 9 b. Mainland Caribou Projects……………………………………………………………9 c. Boothia Caribou Project……………………………………………………………...10 d. Dolphin and Union Caribou Project……………………............................................10 e. Mainland and Boothia Peninsula Muskoxen………………………………………...11 f. Harvest and Ecological Research Operational System (HEROS)…………………...12 g. Vegetation Mapping……………………………………………………………….....12 1.3.2 Kitikmeot Management Initiatives…………………………………………………12 a. Grizzly Bear Management…………………………………………………………...12 b. Bluenose East Management Plan…………………………………………………….12 c. DU Caribou Management Plan………………………………………………………13 d. Muskox Status
    [Show full text]
  • Who Discovered the Northwest Passage? Janice Cavell1
    ARCTIC VOL. 71, NO.3 (SEPTEMBER 2018) P.292 – 308 https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic4733 Who Discovered the Northwest Passage? Janice Cavell1 (Received 31 January 2018; accepted in revised form 1 May 2018) ABSTRACT. In 1855 a parliamentary committee concluded that Robert McClure deserved to be rewarded as the discoverer of a Northwest Passage. Since then, various writers have put forward rival claims on behalf of Sir John Franklin, John Rae, and Roald Amundsen. This article examines the process of 19th-century European exploration in the Arctic Archipelago, the definition of discovering a passage that prevailed at the time, and the arguments for and against the various contenders. It concludes that while no one explorer was “the” discoverer, McClure’s achievement deserves reconsideration. Key words: Northwest Passage; John Franklin; Robert McClure; John Rae; Roald Amundsen RÉSUMÉ. En 1855, un comité parlementaire a conclu que Robert McClure méritait de recevoir le titre de découvreur d’un passage du Nord-Ouest. Depuis lors, diverses personnes ont avancé des prétentions rivales à l’endroit de Sir John Franklin, de John Rae et de Roald Amundsen. Cet article se penche sur l’exploration européenne de l’archipel Arctique au XIXe siècle, sur la définition de la découverte d’un passage en vigueur à l’époque, de même que sur les arguments pour et contre les divers prétendants au titre. Nous concluons en affirmant que même si aucun des explorateurs n’a été « le » découvreur, les réalisations de Robert McClure méritent d’être considérées de nouveau. Mots clés : passage du Nord-Ouest; John Franklin; Robert McClure; John Rae; Roald Amundsen Traduit pour la revue Arctic par Nicole Giguère.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribou (Barren-Ground Population) Rangifer Tarandus
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus Barren-ground population in Canada THREATENED 2016 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2016. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus, Barren-ground population, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xiii + 123 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Anne Gunn, Kim Poole, and Don Russell for writing the status report on Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Barren-ground population, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Justina Ray, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee, with the support of the members of the Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), population de la toundra, au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Caribou — Photo by A. Gunn. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2016. Catalogue No. CW69-14/746-2017E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-07782-6 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2016 Common name Caribou - Barren-ground population Scientific name Rangifer tarandus Status Threatened Reason for designation Members of this population give birth on the open arctic tundra, and most subpopulations (herds) winter in vast subarctic forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Gjoa Haven © Nunavut Tourism
    NUNAVUT COASTAL RESOURCE INVENTORY ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ Department of Environment Avatiliqiyikkut Ministère de l’Environnement Gjoa Haven © Nunavut Tourism ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ Department of Environment Avatiliqiyikkut NUNAVUT COASTAL RESOURCE INVENTORY • Gjoa Haven INVENTORY RESOURCE COASTAL NUNAVUT Ministère de l’Environnement Nunavut Coastal Resource Inventory – Gjoa Haven 2011 Department of Environment Fisheries and Sealing Division Box 1000 Station 1310 Iqaluit, Nunavut, X0A 0H0 GJOA HAVEN Inventory deliverables include: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • A final report summarizing all of the activities This report is derived from the Hamlet of Gjoa Haven undertaken as part of this project; and represents one component of the Nunavut Coastal Resource Inventory (NCRI). “Coastal inventory”, as used • Provision of the coastal resource inventory in a GIS here, refers to the collection of information on coastal database; resources and activities gained from community interviews, research, reports, maps, and other resources. This data is • Large-format resource inventory maps for the Hamlet presented in a series of maps. of Gjoa Haven, Nunavut; and Coastal resource inventories have been conducted in • Key recommendations on both the use of this study as many jurisdictions throughout Canada, notably along the well as future initiatives. Atlantic and Pacific coasts. These inventories have been used as a means of gathering reliable information on During the course of this project, Gjoa Haven was visited on coastal resources to facilitate their strategic assessment, two occasions:
    [Show full text]
  • A National Ecological Framework for Canada
    A NATIONAL ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR CANADA Written and compiled by: Ecological Stratification Working Group Centre for Land and Biological State of the Environment Directorate Resources Research Environment Conservation Service Research Branch Environment Canada Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada ---- Copies of this report and maps available from: Canadian Soil Information System (CanSIS) Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research Research Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Ottawa, ON KIA OC6 State of the Environment Directorate Environmental Conservation Service Environment Canada Hull, PQ KIA OH3 Printed and digital copies of the six regional ecodistrict and ecoregion maps at scale of 1:2 million (Atlantic Provinces #CASOlO; Quebec #CASOll; Ontario #CAS012; Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta #CAS013; British Columbia and Yukon Territory #CASOI4; and the Northwest Territories #CASOI5); and associated databases are available from Canadian Soil Information System (CanSIS), address as above. co Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1996 Cat. No. A42-65/1996E ISBN 0-662-24107-X Egalement disponible en fran91is sous Ie titre Cadrc ecologiqllc national po"r Ie Canada Bibliographic Citation: Ecological Stratification Working Group. 1995. A National Ecological Framework for Canada. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Branch, Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research and Environment Canada, State of the Environment Directorate, Ecozone Analysis Branch, Ottawa/Hull. Report and national map at 1:7500 000 scale. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface iv Acknowledgemenl<; v 1. Ecolo~cal Re~onalization in Canada 1 2. Methodology. .. .. 2 Map COlnpilation . .. 2 Levels of Generalization. .. 2 Ecozones 2 Ecoregions . 4 Ecodistricts 4 Data Integration. .. 6 3. The Ecological Framework 8 4. Applications of the Framework 8 Reporting Applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Instructions Nautiques
    Volume 1, quatneme edition DFO - Libra I MPO - Bibllothequel II I II lill 1111111 II II 14062957 INSTRUCTIONS NAUTIQUES ARCTIQUE CANADIEN VK 808 157 V.1 1994 Peches Fisheries et Oceans and Oceans Canadi t - LSANS CANIOC\ '1471rognyme C!:•(iermel)n Rimouski (01,14bed 35:_ 484 TOL et fax ,418) `,723-18,31 marinas, topographiques et mattes VK 808 157 V.1 1994 Service hydrographique d.. Instructions nautiques : Arctique canadien, vol. 1 179860 14062957 c.1 INSTRUCTIONS NAUTIQUES-ARCTIQUE CANADIEN Volume 1 Photographie de couyerture — Brise- glace NGCC George R. Pearkes escortant les remorqueurs Angus Sherwood et Johnny Hope. Le Service hydrographique du Canada produit et distribue des Cartes marines, des Instructions nautiques, des Guides nautiques et des Tables des mardes des voies navigables du Canada. Les usagers de cette publication sont pries de signaler les dangers nouvellement reperes, les changements des aides a la navigation, l'existence de nouveaux hauts-fonds ou chenaux, les erreurs d'impression ou autres renseignements utiles a la correction des cartes marines et des publications hydrographiques touchant les eaux canadiennes au : Directeur general Service hydrographique du Canada Ministere des Peches et des Oceans Ottawa (Ontario) K 1 A 0E6 Les Instructions nautiques, Guides nautiques, Tables des maries, Tables des niveaux de l'eau, Rapports des activites et Marine Sciences Papers sont publies par la Direction generale des communications pour le Service hydrographique du Canada. On peut se procurer ces publications par le Groupe Communication Canada — Edition ou au Service hydrographique du Canada. YGO INSTRUCTIONS NAUTIQUES ARCTIQUE CANADIEN VOL. 1 QUATRIEME EDITION 1994 Ministere des Vetches et des Oceans Ottawa, Canada ©Ministre des Approvisionnements et Services Canada 1994 En vente par la poste au : Groupe Communication Canada — Edition Ottawa, Canada K1A 0S9 ou chez votre libraire ou au Bureau de distribution des cartes marines Ministere des Peches et des Oceans C.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Canadian Mounted Police
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. DOMINION OF CANADA REPORT OF THE ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE FOR THE YEAR. ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1930 OTTAWA F. A. ACLAND PRINTER TO THE KING'S MOST EXCELLENT MAJESTY 1931 l'ricc, 2,3 cents. DOMINION OF CANADA REPORT OF THE ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1930 Li 'OTTAWA F.
    [Show full text]
  • London Journal of Canadian Studies Article
    London Journal of Canadian Studies Article Why Ross Survived When Franklin Died: Arctic Explorers and the Inuit, 1829–1848 Nicholas Bayne1,* How to cite: Bayne, N., ‘Why Ross Survived When Franklin Died: Arctic Explorers and the Inuit, 1829–1848’. London Journal of Canadian Studies, 2020, 35(1), pp. 67–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ljcs.2020v35.004. Published: 30 November 2020 Peer Review: This article has been peer-reviewed through the journal’s standard double-blind peer review, where both the reviewers and authors are anonymized during review. Copyright: © 2020, Nicholas Bayne. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ljcs.2020v35.004. Open Access: London Journal of Canadian Studies is a peer-reviewed open-access journal. * Correspondence: [email protected] 1 London School of Economic and Political Science, UK © 2020, Nicholas Bayne. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ljcs.2020v35.004 Why Ross Survived When Franklin Died: Arctic Explorers and the Inuit, 1829–1848 Nicholas Bayne Abstract The Franklin expedition disappeared in the High Arctic in the 1840s, looking for the North-West Passage.
    [Show full text]
  • Inuit Approaches to Naming and Distinguishing
    ARCTIC VOL. 71, NO. 3 (SEPTEMBER 2018) P. 309 – 333 https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic4734 Inuit Approaches to Naming and Distinguishing Caribou: Considering Language, Place, and Homeland toward Improved Co-management Gita Ljubicic,1,2 Simon Okpakok,3 Sean Robertson4 and Rebecca Mearns1 (Received 15 December 2017; accepted in revised form 15 May 2018) ABSTRACT. Qikiqtaq (King William Island), in the Kitikmeot region of Nunavut, has been largely overlooked in caribou research to date. Qikiqtaq is shown as blank, or as having uncertain status, in the majority of caribou herd range maps. However, our work with Inuit Elders and hunters in Uqsuqtuuq (Gjoa Haven) on the southeastern coast of Qikiqtaq made it clear that caribou migrate on and off the island seasonally, and some remain on the island year-round. Caribou were identified as a local research priority in 2010, and we have worked together with Uqsuqtuurmiut (people of Uqsuqtuuq) from 2011 to 2016 to document and share Uqsuqtuurmiut knowledge of caribou movements, hunting, and habitat, as well as the importance of caribou for community diets, livelihoods, and cultural practices. In this process, it was important to understand appropriate Inuktitut terminology and local approaches to naming and distinguishing caribou in the region. Uqsuqtuurmiut do not generally distinguish caribou (tuktuit in Inuktitut) according to herds, in the way that biologists or wildlife managers do. Locally, people differentiate four main types of caribou: iluiliup tuktuit (inland caribou), kingailaup tuktuit (island caribou), qungniit (reindeer), and a mixture of iluiliup tuktuit and kingailaup tuktuit. Through these names, along with reviewing approaches to naming and distinguishing caribou in other Kitikmeot and Kivalliq communities, we emphasize how Inuit-caribou connections are articulated and enacted through language, place, and homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 2 SUBMISSION to the NUNAVUT WILDLIFE
    SUBMISSION TO THE NUNAVUT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR Information: Decision: X Issue: Downlisting of Peary Caribou from Endangered to Threatened. Background: In October 2016 the Committee on the Status of Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) provided a re‐ assessment of Peary Caribou to the federal Minister of the Environment. This begins the formal listing process under the federal Species at Risk Act. Peary Caribou, which are currently listed under the federal SARA as Endangered, have been re‐assessed by COSEWIC in a lower risk category as Threatened. A recovery strategy is required for both Endangered and Threatened species. If Peary Caribou are downlisted under the federal SARA, a recovery strategy will still be required and it will not affect the current recovery strategy development process currently underway for Peary Caribou GN - Morgan Anderson Community consultations on the proposed downlisting of Peary Caribou were held with hunters and trappers organizations (HTOs) and regional wildlife boards in the range of Peary Caribou between June and August 2017. Organizations were asked to provide their formal position on the proposed downlisting and with any other comments, concerns or information that they feel should be considered. Consultation packages, in Inuktitut and English, were sent by mail and email. They included: a letter, information on the assessment and a questionnaire/response form. Follow‐up calls to the HTOs and RWBs were made on September 27, 2017. Results of Consultation: Kitikmeot Regional Wildlife Board No response
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Periphery: Long-Term Inuit-European and -Euroamerican Lntersocietal Interaction in the Central Canadian Arctic
    Northern Periphery: Long-Term Inuit-European and -Euroamerican lntersocietal Interaction in the Central Canadian Arctic Donald S. Johnson Department of Anthropology, McGill University, Montreal. May, 1999 A thesis subrnitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfilhent of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts. Copyright O Donald S. Johnson, 1 999 National Library Bibliothèque nationale du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services sewices bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. nie Wellington OttawaON K1AON4 Ottawa ON KIA ON4 Canada Canada Yow fi& Votre réference Our file Notre rdfd~ce The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fkom it Ni la dèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. ABSTRACT This study examines long-term lnuit - European and -Euroamerican intersocietal interaction in the central Canadian Arctic. This geographical area encompasses the traditional ranges of the contiguous Copper, Netsilik and lglulik lnuit societies. Specifically.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Ecoregion Summary Natural Resources Canada (Nrcan) Has Developed a Hierarchical Classification of Ecosystems to Identify Canada’S Ecological Zones
    Kivalliq Ecological Land Classification Map Atlas 2-1 2 Ecoregion Summary Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) has developed a hierarchical classification of ecosystems to identify Canada’s ecological zones. The system incorporates variables such as landforms, climate, relief, soil, flora and fauna, and distinct human activities. Ecozones are the simplest grouping – these represent large ecological zones having characteristic landforms and climate. Each of the ecozones are divided into ecoprovinces. These are characterized by major assemblages of structural or surface forms, faunal realms and vegetation, hydrological, soil and climatic zones. Ecoprovinces are then further stratified into ecoregions, characterized by ecological reactions particular to climate, soil, flora, fauna, water, etc. As displayed in Map 2-1, there are 15 unique terrestrial ecozones within Canada, three of which are present in the Kivalliq Region: • Northern Arctic: Encompasses most of the arctic islands. The landscape consists of low rolling plains covered by permanent frozen ground (permafrost) and by glacial rock debris. The vegetation is generally sparse and stunted. Daylight variations over the course of a year are considerable. The summers are very short and very cool with mean temperatures reaching only just above freezing. Winters are extremely cold with mean temperatures ranging from -25°C to -29°C. Precipitation rates are very low, ranging from 100 to 300 millimetres per year. • Southern Arctic: Bounded to the south by the treeline, a broad ecological division between the taiga forest and the treeless arctic tundra. The terrain is undulating, with many lakes and ponds that have been formed by the melting glaciers of the last glaciation. Permafrost covers the whole ecozone.
    [Show full text]