Near-Optimal Space Perfect Hashing Algorithms
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CS 473: Algorithms, Fall 2019
CS 473: Algorithms, Fall 2019 Universal and Perfect Hashing Lecture 10 September 26, 2019 Chandra and Michael (UIUC) cs473 1 Fall 2019 1 / 45 Today's lecture: Review pairwise independence and related constructions (Strongly) Universal hashing Perfect hashing Announcements and Overview Pset 4 released and due on Thursday, October 3 at 10am. Note one day extension over usual deadline. Midterm 1 is on Monday, Oct 7th from 7-9.30pm. More details and conflict exam information will be posted on Piazza. Next pset will be released after the midterm exam. Chandra and Michael (UIUC) cs473 2 Fall 2019 2 / 45 Announcements and Overview Pset 4 released and due on Thursday, October 3 at 10am. Note one day extension over usual deadline. Midterm 1 is on Monday, Oct 7th from 7-9.30pm. More details and conflict exam information will be posted on Piazza. Next pset will be released after the midterm exam. Today's lecture: Review pairwise independence and related constructions (Strongly) Universal hashing Perfect hashing Chandra and Michael (UIUC) cs473 2 Fall 2019 2 / 45 Part I Review Chandra and Michael (UIUC) cs473 3 Fall 2019 3 / 45 Pairwise independent random variables Definition Random variables X1; X2;:::; Xn from a range B are pairwise independent if for all 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n and for all b; b0 2 B, 0 0 Pr[Xi = b; Xj = b ] = Pr[Xi = b] · Pr[Xj = b ] : Chandra and Michael (UIUC) cs473 4 Fall 2019 4 / 45 Interesting case: n = m = p where p is a prime number Pick a; b uniformly at random from f0; 1; 2;:::; p − 1g Set Xi = ai + b Only need to store a; b. -
Fundamental Data Structures Contents
Fundamental Data Structures Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Abstract data type ........................................... 1 1.1.1 Examples ........................................... 1 1.1.2 Introduction .......................................... 2 1.1.3 Defining an abstract data type ................................. 2 1.1.4 Advantages of abstract data typing .............................. 4 1.1.5 Typical operations ...................................... 4 1.1.6 Examples ........................................... 5 1.1.7 Implementation ........................................ 5 1.1.8 See also ............................................ 6 1.1.9 Notes ............................................. 6 1.1.10 References .......................................... 6 1.1.11 Further ............................................ 7 1.1.12 External links ......................................... 7 1.2 Data structure ............................................. 7 1.2.1 Overview ........................................... 7 1.2.2 Examples ........................................... 7 1.2.3 Language support ....................................... 8 1.2.4 See also ............................................ 8 1.2.5 References .......................................... 8 1.2.6 Further reading ........................................ 8 1.2.7 External links ......................................... 9 1.3 Analysis of algorithms ......................................... 9 1.3.1 Cost models ......................................... 9 1.3.2 Run-time analysis -
Algorithms in a Nutshell 2E
www.it-ebooks.info SECOND EDITION Algorithms in a Nutshell 2E George T. Heineman, Gary Pollice, and Stanley Selkow Boston www.it-ebooks.info Algorithms in a Nutshell 2E, Second Edition by George T. Heineman, Gary Pollice, and Stanley Selkow Copyright © 2010 George Heineman, Gary Pollice and Stanley Selkow. All rights re‐ served. Printed in the United States of America. Published by O’Reilly Media, Inc., 1005 Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol, CA 95472. O’Reilly books may be purchased for educational, business, or sales promotional use. Online editions are also available for most titles (http://safaribooksonline.com). For more information, contact our corporate/institutional sales department: 800-998-9938 or [email protected]. Editor: Mary Treseler Indexer: FIX ME! Production Editor: FIX ME! Cover Designer: Karen Montgomery Copyeditor: FIX ME! Interior Designer: David Futato Proofreader: FIX ME! Illustrator: Rebecca Demarest January -4712: Second Edition Revision History for the Second Edition: 2015-07-27: Early release revision 1 See http://oreilly.com/catalog/errata.csp?isbn=0636920032885 for release details. Nutshell Handbook, the Nutshell Handbook logo, and the O’Reilly logo are registered trademarks of O’Reilly Media, Inc. !!FILL THIS IN!! and related trade dress are trade‐ marks of O’Reilly Media, Inc. Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their prod‐ ucts are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and O’Reilly Media, Inc. was aware of a trademark claim, the designations have been printed in caps or initial caps. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, the publisher and authors assume no responsibility for errors or omissions, or for damages resulting from the use of the information contained herein. -
Optimal Algorithms for Minimal Perfect Hashing
Optimal algorithms for minimal perfect hashing George Havas and Bohdan S. Majewski Key Centre for Software Technology Department of Computer Science University of Queensland Queensland 4072 Australia Abstract Minimal perfect hash functions are used for memory e±cient storage and fast retrieval of items from static sets. We present an overview of previous solutions and analyze a new algorithm based on random graphs for generating order preserving minimal perfect hash functions. We show that the new algorithm is both time and space optimal in addition to being practical. The algorithm generates a minimal perfect hash function in two steps. First a special kind of function into a random graph is computed probabilistically. Then this function is re¯ned deterministically to a minimal perfect hash function. The ¯rst step uses linear random time, while the second runs in linear deterministic time. Key words: Data structures, probabilistic algorithms, analysis of algorithms, hashing, random graphs 1 Introduction Consider a set W of m words each of which is a ¯nite string of symbols over an ordered alphabet §. A hash function is a function h : W ! I that maps the set of words W into some given interval of integers I, say [0; k¡1], where k is an integer, and usually k ¸ m. The hash function, given a word, computes an address (an integer from I) for the storage or retrieval of that item. The storage area used to store items is known as a hash table. Words for which the same address is computed are called synonyms. Due to the existence of synonyms a situation called collision may arise in which two items w1 and w2 have the same address. -
The Tree Model for Hashing: Lower and Upper Bounds
The Tree Model for Hashing: Lower and Upper Bounds by Joseph Gil Friedhelm Meyer auf Der Heide and A vi Wigderson Technical Report 91-23 December 1991 Department of Computer Science University of British Columbia Rm 333 - 6356 Agricultural Road Vancouver, B.C. CANADA V6T 1Z2 The Tree Model for Hashing: Lower and Upper Bounds* Joseph Gil Friedhelm Meyer auf Der Heide The University of British Columbia Universitat Paderborn A vi Wigderson The Hebrew University of Jerusalem December 1991 Abstract We define a new simple general model which captures many natural (sequential and parallel) hashing algorithms. In a game against nature, the algorithm and coin tosses cause the evolution of a random tree, whose size corresponds to space (hash table size), and two notions of depth correspond to the longest probe sequences for insertion (parallel insertion time) and search of a key, respectively. We stu_dy these parameters of hashing schemes by analyzing the underlying stochas tic process, and derive tight lower and upper bounds on the relation between the amount of memory allocated to the hashing execution and the worst case insertion time. In particular, we show that if linear memory is used then not all key inser tions to the hash table can be done in constant time. Except for extremely unlikely events, every input set of size n will have members for which f!(lg lg n) applications of a hash function are required. From a parallel perspective it can be said that n processors need f!(lglgn) expected time to hash themselves into O(n) space, al though serial algorithms exist that achieve constant amortized time for insertion, as well as constant worst case search time [16). -
Lecture 08 Hashing
18.10.18 ADT – asscociative array • INSERT, SEARCH, DELETE Advanced Algorithmics (6EAP) • An associative array (also associative container, MTAT.03.238 map, mapping, dictionary, finite map, and in query- Hashing processing an index or index file) is an abstract data type composed of a collection of unique keys and a collection of values, where each key is associated Jaak Vilo with one value (or set of values). The operation of 2018 Fall finding the value associated with a key is called a lookup or indexing, and this is the most important operation supported by an associative array. Jaak Vilo 1 Why? • Speed! - O(1) • Space efficient 1 18.10.18 Keys • Integers • Strings • ID-codes • Floating point nr-s(?) • Usual assumption – keys are integers. • Step 1: Map keys to integers. 2 18.10.18 3 18.10.18 Primary clustering Implementation of open addressing How do we define h(k,i) ? Linear probing: Quadratic probing: Double hashing: 4 18.10.18 Quadratic Probing Quadratic Probing • Suppose that an element should appear in bin • If one of h + i2 falls into a cluster, this does not h: imply the next one will – if bin h is occupied, then check the following sequence of bins: h + 12, h + 22, h + 32, h + 42, h + 52, ... h + 1, h + 4, h + 9, h + 16, h + 25, ... • For example, with M = 17: • Secondary clustering – all k colliding in h(k) will cluster to same locations… 5 18.10.18 Birthday Paradox • In probability theory, the birthday problem, or birthday paradox[1] pertains to the probability that in a set of randomly chosen people some pair of them will have the same birthday. -
Data Structures
Data structures PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:55:22 UTC Contents Articles Introduction 1 Data structure 1 Linked data structure 3 Succinct data structure 5 Implicit data structure 7 Compressed data structure 8 Search data structure 9 Persistent data structure 11 Concurrent data structure 15 Abstract data types 18 Abstract data type 18 List 26 Stack 29 Queue 57 Deque 60 Priority queue 63 Map 67 Bidirectional map 70 Multimap 71 Set 72 Tree 76 Arrays 79 Array data structure 79 Row-major order 84 Dope vector 86 Iliffe vector 87 Dynamic array 88 Hashed array tree 91 Gap buffer 92 Circular buffer 94 Sparse array 109 Bit array 110 Bitboard 115 Parallel array 119 Lookup table 121 Lists 127 Linked list 127 XOR linked list 143 Unrolled linked list 145 VList 147 Skip list 149 Self-organizing list 154 Binary trees 158 Binary tree 158 Binary search tree 166 Self-balancing binary search tree 176 Tree rotation 178 Weight-balanced tree 181 Threaded binary tree 182 AVL tree 188 Red-black tree 192 AA tree 207 Scapegoat tree 212 Splay tree 216 T-tree 230 Rope 233 Top Trees 238 Tango Trees 242 van Emde Boas tree 264 Cartesian tree 268 Treap 273 B-trees 276 B-tree 276 B+ tree 287 Dancing tree 291 2-3 tree 292 2-3-4 tree 293 Queaps 295 Fusion tree 299 Bx-tree 299 Heaps 303 Heap 303 Binary heap 305 Binomial heap 311 Fibonacci heap 316 2-3 heap 321 Pairing heap 321 Beap 324 Leftist tree 325 Skew heap 328 Soft heap 331 d-ary heap 333 Tries 335 Trie -
Choosing Best Hashing Strategies and Hash Functions
Choosing Best Hashing Strategies and Hash Functions Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Degree of Master of Engineering in Software Engineering By: Name: Mahima Singh Roll No: 80731011 Under the supervision of: Dr. Deepak Garg Assistant Professor, CSED & Mr. Ravinder Kumar Lecturer, CSED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT THAPAR UNIVERSITY PATIALA – 147004 JUNE 2009 Certificate I hereby certify that the work which is being presented in the thesis report entitled, “Choosing Best Hashing Strategies and Hash Functions”, submitted by me in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of degree of Master of Engineering in Computer Science and Engineering submitted in Computer Science and Engineering Department of Thapar University, Patiala, is an authentic record of my own work carried out under the supervision of Dr. Deepak Garg and Mr. Ravinder Kumar and refers other researcher’s works which are duly listed in the reference section. The matter presented in this thesis has not been submitted for the award of any other degree of this or any other university. (Mahima Singh) This is to certify that the above statement made by the candidate is correct and true to the best of my knowledge. (Dr. Deepak Garg) Assistant Professor, CSED Thapar University Patiala And (Mr. Ravinder Kumar) Lecturer, CSED Thapar University Patiala Countersigned by: Dr. Rajesh Kumar Bhatia (Dr. R.K.SHARMA) Assistant Professor & Head Dean (Academic Affairs) Computer Science & Engineering. Department Thapar University, Thapar University Patiala. Patiala. i Acknowledgement No volume of words is enough to express my gratitude towards my guide, Dr. Deepak Garg Assistant Professor.