DOCSLIB.ORG

Cholera in South Sudan Situation Report # 13 As at 23:59 Hours, 28 May 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cholera in South Sudan Situation Report # 13 As at 23:59 Hours, 28 May 2014 Republic of South Sudan Cholera in South Sudan Situation Report # 13 as at 23:59 Hours, 28 May 2014 Background On 29 April 2014, a suspected case of cholera was reported from the MSF clinic at UN House/Juba III Protection of Civilian (PoC) camp. The previous day he had visited relatives in Gudele where he developed severe diarrhoea. One of the contacts in the household had developed acute watery diarrhea on the 24 April 2014. Following field investigations and laboratory confirmation, on 15 May 2014, the Ministry of Health declared an outbreak of cholera in Juba. Since then, several suspected cases have been recorded and laboratory confirmed from different suburbs in Juba. A retrospective record review at the emergency medical ward of Juba Teaching Hospital (JTH) revealed seven suspected cholera cases including one death, with the first case admitted at JTH on 23 April 2014. Situation Update The table below summarizes the number of suspected and confirmed cases reported in Juba. Table 1 Summary of cholera cases, 23 April - 28 May 2014 No. Summary of cases JTH Gurei Tongping UN House Other Total CTC CTC CTC (Juba III) sites A Total new admisions today 67 25 0 0 0 92 B Total new discharges today 69 16 0 0 0 85 C Total new deaths today 0 0 0 0 0 0 D Total number of cases currently admitted 103 26 0 2 0 131 E Leave Against Medical Advice (LAMA) 15 0 0 0 0 15 F Total facility deaths since the onset of 15 0 0 0 1 16 the outbreak G Community deaths since the onset of the 0 0 0 0 11 11 outbreak H Cumulative deaths since the onset of the 15 0 0 0 12 27 outbreaks J Cumulative cases discharged 604 75 3 7 1 690 K Cumulative cases 763 101 3 9 16 892 L Number of cases with laboratory 29 0 0 1 4 34 confirmation by culture *Includes cases detected in private health facilities and at community level § On 28 May 2014, 92 new cases were admitted at the cholera treatment centres (CTC) in Juba and 85 cases discharged leaving 131 patients on admission in the cholera treatment centres (table 1). A total of 15 cases in JTH CTC left the isolation ward without proper discharge. This highlights the need to enhance security checks at the CTC gate. § Cases have been reported from nine Payams in Juba county with the most affected being Munuki 279 (31%). See table 2. 1 Table 2 Cholera cases by area of origin in Juba, 23 April - 28 May 2014 Payam Week 17 Week 18 Week 19 Week 20 Week 21 Week 22 Cases by Payam (%) Munuki 0 0 0 72 125 82 279 (31) Rejaf 1 0 0 24 73 94 192 (22) Northern Bari 1 2 0 63 70 20 156 (17) Juba 0 0 0 26 95 22 143 (16) Kator 1 0 0 14 43 25 83 (9) Missing 0 1 0 4 23 0 28 (3) Gondokoro 0 0 0 3 2 0 5 (1) Lirya 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 (0.1) Lokiriri 0 0 0 2 1 1 4 (0.4) Mangala 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 (0.1) Total by epi-week 3 3 0 209 432 245 892 (100) § The most affected villages include Gumbo in Rejaf, Gudele I in Munuki, Tongping in Juba, and Gudele II in Northern Bari (figure 1). Figure 1: Cholera cases from the five most affected villages per Payam, 23 April - 28 May 2014 § Since the beginning of the outbreak on 23 April 2014, 892 cumulative cholera cases including 27 deaths (16 institutional and 11 community deaths) with CFR= 3% have been reported. The majority of the deaths reported in hospital died on arrival. Hence the need to strengthen community case detection and prompt initiation of ORS treatment while immediate referral to the nearest CTC is being organized. § Figure 2 shows the outbreak trend since it started on 23 April 2013.Two peaks of transmission were registered on 19/05/2014 and 26/05/2014. 2 Figure 2: Juba cholera epidemic curve, 23 April 2014 - 28 May 2014 § Of the 892 cholera cases reported, majority (497, 62%) are male, and aged 20-34 years (356, 41%). Figure 3: Distribution of cholera cases by age, Juba, 23 April - 28 May 2014 3 Figure 4: Number of daily admissions at the Juba CTCs, 23 April - 28 May 2014 Assessment of risk factors and possible exposure is ongoing at all locations. The main risk factors for cholera in Juba are suspected to include the following: § Drinking of untreated river water which in Juba is primarily supplied by water tankers, § Poor latrine use, lack of latrines and open defecation, § Eating foods sold on the roadside and at makeshift markets. § Poor personal hygiene practices (for example hand washing) and community hygiene. § In addition, consumption of water from unsafe sources such as surface water-river and ponds, poor community handling of dead bodies and unsupervised burials are other factors that increase the risk of the Juba community to contracting cholera. Cholera Alerts Table 3 Summary of cholera alerts No Date Details of the alert Area Needs/Actions taken received 1. 29/05/2014 • Five suspect Yei, Central • Taskforce has been re-activated cholera cases Equatoria • Isolation ward has been designated in including one death Yei Civil hospital • The four suspect • PSI contacted to provide water guard cases are admitted • Dissemination of cholera brochures and in Yei Civil Hospital radio messages is underway • Index case died • Rapid diagnostic test positive for cholera after he developed • Three collected samples will be sent to profuse watery Juba diarrhoea on arrival • Suspected cases have been isolated in from Juba Yei civil hospital • 4 No Date Details of the alert Area Needs/Actions taken received 2. 29/05/2014 Two bodies of Yei, Central • The Yei and Juba county surveillance suspected cholera Equatoria officers are currently investigating the community deaths have report to identify further cases and list been transferred from contacts. Juba to Yei Response actions today Case Management § In order to decongest the JTH CTC, the case management, surveillance and laboratory working group has agreed that ambulances will now transfer some of the cholera cases to the Gurei CTC. § The Ministry of Health working with WHO, UNICEF, and NPA are planning to set up a cholera treatment centre in Gumbo. § MSF Spain is currently training health workers in Melut hospital on cholera case management and has already prepositioned cholera case management kits. A follow-up mission by MSF to Kaka revealed that no additional deaths have occurred. All drinking water is being treated and all the AWD cases in Kaka PHCC were discharged. Surveillance and Laboratory § Five suspected cholera cases including one death were reported in Yei County, Central Equatoria State. The index case travelled from Juba to Yei on 26/05/2014 and developed symptom on 28/05/2014. He was brought to Yei Civil Hospital on the morning of 29/05/2014 but died shortly after admission. The other four cases have been isolated in Yei Civil Hospital following positive cholera RDT results. The stool samples have been sent to the national reference laboratory for culture and sensitivity. § The national public health laboratory isolated vibrio cholerae inaba from two samples collected from JTH and Kajo Keji in Central Equatoria state. The Kajo Keji county health has been alerted to conduct further case verification and contact identification. However, antimicrobial sensitivity testing cannot be done since there are no antimicrobial discs in the laboratory. § On 29/05/2014, the AMREF Laboratory in Kenya released additional cholera test results. Out of the 45 additional samples tested, 24 (53%) were positive for Vibrio cholera inaba. The isolates were sensitive to Tetracycline by resistant to Ampicillin, chloramphenicol, Nalidixic acid, and Cotrimoxazole. § The surveillance team continues to receive and investigate all cholera alerts from the peripheral facilities and community levels. § Epidemiological analysis of the outbreak data is ongoing to inform the current response. Social Mobilization § House to house cholera prevention and control campaigns continued today in Juba, Kator and Rejaf reaching a total of 2,530 households with key messages on cholera prevention through hand washing and chlorination demonstrations. These include 630 HHs from Rejaf, 700 HHs from Juba and 1200 Hs from Kator. § Cholera prevention and control campaigns covered 1000 households in Gudele and 400 HHs in Lologo; a total of 8,104 households reached to date in those areas. 5 § To date, 28,944 males and 22,934 females have been reached in Munuki A, B, C and Gudele I and II with cholera prevention messages. A total of 29,222 PUR sachets for water treatment and 11,845 ORS have been distributed in the area. § Other community mobilization activities include: o Awareness activities in Gumbo IDPs camp. OVCI during their awareness campaign got three (3) cases of suspected cholera of them children. They immediately called the ambulance and the 3 children were transferred to Juba CTC. Tents were these sick children were disinfected by the Ambulance officers. o Street announcements and distribution of about 150 pcs of IEC materials in Gumbo and Gudele. o Mobilization using music, dance and drama in Gudele I and II markets. Four (4) drama sessions were performed on cholera prevention with average attendance of 200 persons in each session. o Music shops in strategic market points shall begin broadcasting hourly messages on cholera prevention and treatment 4 stations are in the pipeline for this activity. This will focus on the main markets of Munuki, Gudele, Juba taxi park market and Konyo konyo.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Sudan Country Portfolio
    South Sudan Country Portfolio Overview: Country program established in 2013. USADF currently U.S. African Development Foundation Partner Organization: Foundation for manages a portfolio of 9 projects and one Cooperative Agreement. Tom Coogan, Regional Director Youth Initiative Total active commitment is $737,000. Regional Director Albino Gaw Dar, Director Country Strategy: The program focuses on food security and Email: [email protected] Tel: +211 955 413 090 export-oriented products. Email: [email protected] Grantee Duration Value Summary Kanybek General Trading and 2015-2018 $98,772 Sector: Agro-Processing (Maize Milling) Investment Company Ltd. Location: Mugali, Eastern Equatoria State 4155-SSD Summary: The project funds will be used to build Kanybek’s capacity in business and financial management. The funds will also build technical capacity by providing training in sustainable agriculture and establishing a small milling facility to process raw maize into maize flour. Kajo Keji Lulu Works 2015-2018 $99,068 Sector: Manufacturing (Shea Butter) Multipurpose Cooperative Location: Kajo Keji County, Central Equatoria State Society (LWMCS) Summary: The project funds will be used to develop LWMCS’s capacity in financial and 4162-SSD business management, and to improve its production capacity by establishing a shea nut purchase fund and purchasing an oil expeller and related equipment to produce grade A shea butter for export. Amimbaru Paste Processing 2015-2018 $97,523 Sector: Agro-Processing (Peanut Paste) Cooperative Society (APP) Location: Loa in the Pageri Administrative Area, Eastern Equatoria State 4227-SSD Summary: The project funds will be used to improve the business and financial management of APP through a series of trainings and the hiring of a management team.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Needs and Agency Conflict: a Case Study of Kajo Keji County, Sudan
    African Studies Quarterly | Volume 11, Issue 1 | Fall 2009 Local Needs and Agency Conflict: A Case Study of Kajo Keji County, Sudan RANDALL FEGLEY Abstract: During Southern Sudan’s second period of civil war, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) provided almost all of the region’s public services and greatly influenced local administration. Refugee movements, inadequate infrastructures, food shortages, accountability issues, disputes and other difficulties overwhelmed both the agencies and newly developed civil authorities. Blurred distinctions between political and humanitarian activities resulted, as demonstrated in a controversy surrounding a 2004 distribution of relief food in Central Equatoria State. Based on analysis of documents, correspondence and interviews, this case study of Kajo Keji reveals many of the challenges posed by NGO activity in Southern Sudan and other countries emerging from long-term instability. Given recurrent criticisms of NGOs in war-torn areas of Africa, agency operations must be appropriately geared to affected populations and scrutinized by governments, donors, recipients and the media. A Critique of NGO Operations Once seen as unquestionably noble, humanitarian agencies have been subject to much criticism in the last 30 years.1 This has been particularly evident in the Horn of Africa. Drawing on experience in Ethiopia, Hancock depicted agencies as bureaucracies more intent on keeping themselves going than helping the poor.2 Noting that aid often allowed despots to maintain power, enrich themselves and escape responsibility, he criticized their tendency for big, wasteful projects using expensive experts who bypass local concerns and wisdom and do not speak local languages. He accused their personnel of being lazy, over-paid, under-educated and living in luxury amid their impoverished clients.
    [Show full text]
  • LC SS 706 A1 EEQ 20130301.Pdf
    pp p ! ! p ! p (! ! !( 32°0'0"E 33°0'0"E 34°0'0"E 35°0'0"E Gwalla Awan KolnyangAluk Katanich Titong Munini Beru ! R . K Wowa ang en Logoda N Rigl Chilimun N " " 0 0 p' Bor South County ' 0 Pibor County Lowelli Katchikan River Bellel Kichepo 0 ° Maktiweng J O N G L E I ° 6 Kaigo 6 Lochiret R. Naro Kenamuke Swamp R Ngechele . S Neria u p Kanopir Natibok Kabalatigo i r i ( B Moru Kimod a Rongada h r Yebisak e g l- n Tombi J o e b b l Shogle e a l) Buka h C . Gwojo-Adung Kassangor R Baro ! E T H I O P I A Moru Kerri KURON Kuron Gigging p Bojo-Ajut Gemmaiza ! Karn Ethi Kerkeng Moru Ethi Nakadocwa Poko Wani Terekeka County Kobowen Swamp Borichadi Bokuna Poko Kassengo Selemani Pagar Nabwel Wani Mika Chabong Tukara C E N T R A L p River Nakua p Kenyi E Q U A T O R I A Moru Angbin Mukajo Gali Owiyabong Kursomba Lotimor Bulu Koli Kalaruz Awakot Katima Waha ! Akitukomoi River Gera Tumu Nanyangachor Nyabongi Napalap ! Namoropus Natilup Swamp ) it Wanyang Kangitabok Lomokori le Eyata Moru Kolinyagkopil il ! Terakeka ri Lozut Lomongole t iti o (! S L Magara p R. ( n Umm Gura Mwanyakapin a p y l Abuilingakine Lomareng Plateau a Dogora R Ngigalingatun k o . L Jelli L o p Rambo Djie Navi . Lokodopotok Nyaginei Kangeleng p R Biyara Nai A o Kworijik Kangibun Lomuleye Katirima t o Simsima Badigeru Swamp River Lokuja Losagam k Musha Lukwatuk Pass Doinyoro East p o p l Balala Legeri Buboli Kalopedet Pongo River Lokorowa Watha Peth Hills Bume E A S T E R N E Q U A T O R I A Lokidangoai Nawitapal Lopokori Lokomarukest Kolobeleng Yakara Dogatwan Nomogonjet Kagethi ! Mogos Bala Pool Lapon County Lotakawa Kanyabu Moru Ethi Donyiro West Donyiro Cliff Kedowa Kothokan a l l i Chokagiling t Karakamuge o Mangalla Bwoda L Mediket Kaliapus Nyangatom !( .
    [Show full text]
  • Frontlines September/October 2011
    FRONTLINES WWW.USAID.GOV SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2011 TWO SUDANS THE SEPARATION OF AFRICA’S LARGEST COUNTRY AND THE ROAD AHEAD > A GLOBAL EDUCATION FOOTPRINT TAKES SHAPE > EGYPT SHAKES UP THE CLASSROOM > Q&A WITH REP. NITA LOWEY Sudan & South Sudan/Education Edition INSIGHTS From Administrator Dr. Rajiv Shah A few weeks before South Sudan’s skills, making it more likely they will day of independence, I had the oppor- eventually drop out. tunity to visit the region and meet a These failures leave developing na- HE WORLD welcomed its group of children who were learning tions without the human and social newest nation when South English and math in a USAID-supported capital needed to advance and sustain Sudan officially gained its primary education program. The stu- development. They deprive too many inde pendence on July 9. After dents ranged in ages from 4 to 14. individuals of the skills they need as Tover two decades of war and suffering, Many of the older students have lived productive members of their commu- a peace agree ment between north and through a period of displacement, vio- nities and providers for their families. south Sudan paved the way for South lence, and trauma. This was likely the Across the world, our education pro- Sudanese to fulfill their dreams of self- very first opportunity they had to re- grams emphasize a special focus on determination. The United States played ceive even a basic education. disadvantaged groups such as women an important role in helping make this When you see American taxpayer and girls and those living in remote moment possible, and today we remain money being effectively used to provide areas.
    [Show full text]
  • “Soldiers Assume We Are Rebels” Escalating Violence and Abuses in South Sudan’S Equatorias WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS “Soldiers Assume We Are Rebels” Escalating Violence and Abuses in South Sudan’s Equatorias WATCH “Soldiers Assume We Are Rebels” Escalating Violence and Abuses in South Sudan’s Equatorias Copyright © 2017 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-35065 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org AUGUST 2017 ISBN: 978-1-6231-35065 “Soldiers Assume We Are Rebels” Escalating Violence and Abuses in South Sudan’s Equatorias Map .................................................................................................................................... I Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Rinderpest Control in Southern Sudan 1989-2000
    Review of Rinderpest Control in Southern Sudan 1989-2000 Prepared for the Community-based Animal Health and Epidemiology (CAPE) Unit of the Pan African Programme for the Control of Epizootics (PACE) Bryony Jones March 2001 Acknowledgements The information contained in this document has been collected over the years by southern Sudanese animal health workers, UNICEF/OLS Livestock Project staff, Tufts University consultants, and the staff of NGOs that have supported community-based animal health projects in southern Sudan (ACROSS, ACORD, ADRA, DOT, GAA, NPA, Oxfam-GB, Oxfam-Quebec, SC-UK, VETAID, VSF-B, VSF-CH, VSF-G, Vetwork Services Trust, World Relief). The individuals involved are too numerous to name, but their hard work and contribution of information is gratefully acknowledged. The data from the early years of the OLS Livestock Programme (1993 to 1996) was collated by Tim Leyland, formerly UNICEF/OLS Livestock Project Officer. Disease outbreak information from 1998 to date has been collated by Dr Gachengo Matindi, FAO/OLS Livestock Officer (formerly UNICEF/OLS Livestock Officer). Rinderpest serology and virus testing has mainly been carried out by National Veterinary Research Centre, Muguga, Nairobi. Any errors or omissions in this review are the fault of the author. If any reader has additional information to correct an error or omission the author would be grateful to receive this information. For further information contact: CAPE Unit PACE Programme OAU/IBAR PO Box 30786 Nairobi Tel: Nairobi 226447 Fax: Nairobi 226565 E mail: [email protected] Or the author: Bryony Jones PO Box 13434 Nairobi Kenya Tel: Nairobi 580799 E mail: [email protected] 2 CONTENTS Page 1.
    [Show full text]
  • FAO-WFP Crop and Food Security Assessment Mission to South Sudan
    S P E C I A L R E P O R T FAO/WFP CROP AND FOOD SECURITY ASSESSMENT MISSION TO SOUTH SUDAN 8 February 2012 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS, ROME WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME, ROME - 2 - This report has been prepared by Swithun Goodbody and Jonathan Pound (FAO) and Rogerio Bonifacio (WFP) under the responsibility of the FAO and WFP Secretariats with information from official and other sources. Since conditions may change rapidly, please contact the undersigned for further information if required. Shukri Ahmed Stanlake Samkange Senior Economist, EST-GIEWS Regional Director Trade and Markets Division, FAO WFP-ODN Fax: 0039-06-5705-4495 Fax: 0027-11-517-1642 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Please note that this Special Report is also available on the Internet as part of the FAO World Wide Web www.fao.org at the following URL address: http://www.fao.org/giews/ and http://www.wfp.org/food- security/reports/CFSAM The Special Alerts/Reports can also be received automatically by E-mail as soon as they are published, by subscribing to the GIEWS/Alerts report ListServ. To do so, please send an E-mail to the FAO-Mail-Server at the following address: [email protected], leaving the subject blank, with the following message: subscribe GIEWSAlertsWorld-L To be deleted from the list, send the message: unsubscribe GIEWSAlertsWorld-L Please note that it is now possible to subscribe to regional lists to only receive Special Reports/Alerts by region: Africa, Asia, Europe or Latin America (GIEWSAlertsAfrica-L, GIEWSAlertsAsia-L, GIEWSAlertsEurope- L and GIEWSAlertsLA-L).
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan: Bi-Weekly Humanitarian Situation Report Emergency Type: Humanitarian Crises Issue 17 | Date: 16– 30 September 2020
    South Sudan: Bi-Weekly Humanitarian Situation Report Emergency type: Humanitarian Crises Issue 17 | Date: 16– 30 September 2020 KEY FIGURES COVID-19 SITUATION 7.5M 2.24M 2 732 50 2 560 People in Need of South Sudanese confirmed deaths recoveries Humanitarian Refugees cases Assistance HIGHLIGHTS 1.67M 1.3M Internally Displaced Malnourished Since the first case of COVID-19 confirmed in South Sudan on 5 April Children 2020, a total of 2 732 cases and 50 deaths (case fatality rate of 1.8%) has been reported as of September 30 2020. 188K 352K An estimated 800 000 people across 37 counties along the White Nile Persons living in Malnourished have been affected by floods in South Sudan since July 2020. PoC1 Women The Humanitarian Coordinator allocated US$10 million from the South Sudan Humanitarian Fund to support floods response. Malaria, Acute Respiratory Illnesses and Bloody diarrhea are the top 64 6.48M cause of morbidity in the protection of civilians (POCs). Stabilization Centers Severely Food Insecure Children under one year 121 066 vaccinated with oral polio (20%) vaccine Initial numbers of children 962 158 vaccinated against measles Counties with confirmed 8 measles outbreaks in 2020 PoC1 s sites with confirmed 1 measles outbreaks in 2020 Counties with malaria cases 2 surpassing their set thresholds Mr Julu Louis, WHO State Coordinator asesing the rising flood waters in Pibor. Photo: @WHO. 1 UN Protection of Civilians’ South Sudan: Bi-Weekly Humanitarian Situation Report Emergency type: Humanitarian Crises Issue 17 | Date: 16– 30 September 2020 Overview of Updates on flooding in South Sudan: The latest numbers show more than 800 000 people have been the affected by flooding in areas along the White Nile since July.
    [Show full text]
  • HIV Behavioural Surveillance Survey in Kajo Keji County
    id18844656 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com HIV Behavioural Surveillance Survey in Kajo Keji County, Central Equatoria State, Southern Sudan IGAD - UNHCR August 2010 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The HIV Behavioral Surveillance Survey (BSS) in Kajo Keji County in Central Equatoria State, Southern Sudan was a collaborative effort between many individuals and organizations. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Canadian International development Agency (CIDA), World Bank (WB) and Inter-governmental Authority on Development (IGAD) supported the project financially and technically. The Ministry of Health, the Southern Sudan AIDS Commission, Central Equitoria State AIDS Commission and the Southern Sudan Commission for Census, Statistics and Evaluation, played a critical role in the formulation, design and implementation of the survey. The following people deserve special mention for the roles they played in supporting the implementation of this survey: Dr. Lul Riek, Ministry of Health; Dr. Ayat Jervase, Ministry of Health; Ms. Viana Kakuli Aggrey, Southern Sudan AIDS Commission; Mr. Joel Dumba-Crispo, Central Equitoria State AIDS Commission; Mr. Eliaba Yona Damundu and Mr. Julius Sebit, Southern Sudan Centre for Census, Statistics and Evaluation. The team of 27 field staff of enumerators, field guides, drivers, and data entry clerks worked tirelessly to ensure the success of the survey even in a physically challenging environment and under stressful conditions. Dr. Paul Spiegel, Ms. Marian Schilperoord, Dr. Patterson Njogu, Ms. Angela Kitonga and Ms. Sylvia Alison of UNHCR most zealously and relentlessly supported the implementation of this project. Ms. Grace Mugwe and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Private Cooperation Fragile States
    Public Private Cooperation Fragile States Annexe F to the Field study report South Sudan As part of the Country Study South Sudan Working group: Public Private Cooperation in Fragile States July 2009 1 Supplementary Document (annex F) to the Field Research Report on Public Private Cooperation opportunities in Southern Sudan, Nov 2009 by Irma Specht & Mark van Dorp (main researchers) and Washington Okeyo, Marjolein C. Groot and John Penn de Ngong 1. Specific (sub) sectors in more detail This annex provides, in more detail, the ongoing and potential sectors relevant for economic development and PPC in South Sudan. These are details found during the field research and are to complement the overview provided in the overall report. Oil and mineral production The most important economic activity in Southern Sudan is oil production, which is currently taking place in the oil rich regions of Upper Nile, Abyei and Unity State. Oil was discovered in Sudan in the mid-1970s, but production did not start until 1999. The pioneer companies Chevron and Shell were forced to leave in 1984, after the outbreak of civil war. They eventually sold their rights in 1990, booking a $1 billion loss. Major players that have controlled the oil industry in Sudan since the mid-nineties include the Chinese National Petroleum Company (CNPC) and Petronas Caligary from Malaysia, Lundin Petroleum from Sweden and ONGC Videsh from India. While, at a global level, Sudan is a minor oil exporting country, China, India and Malaysia have invested billions of dollars in the country, including outside the oil industry. They consider their relations with the country not only as economic, but also geostrategic and energy-strategic successes that are worth defending.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Situation
    SOUTH SUDAN SITUATION REGIONAL UPDATE 1 – 15 February 2017 KEY FIGURES HIGHLIGHTS 137,297* South Sudanese arrivals in 2017, High numbers of South Sudanese refugees continue to flee South Sudan to based on field reports as of 15 Feb neighbouring countries. In the first half of February, over 60,000 new arrivals were reported in asylum countries, including some 48,000 arrivals to Uganda where the daily arrival rate peaked at 6,765 on 1 February. Refugees report 1,572,641* that fire is being used to clear the bush in South Sudan and the population Total South Sudanese refugees as of have been urged to move to towns and cities, with anyone found in the 15 Feb 2017 (pre and post Dec 2013 countryside being charged with supporting opposing groups. caseload and new arrivals) In Sudan, UNHCR is working with local authorities to verify arrivals figures 260,868 after reports of over 20,000 new South Sudanese refugee arrivals between 1 Refugees in South Sudan and 26 February. The initial population planning figures anticipated 60,000 new arrivals to Sudan in 2017, which will likely be exceeded if the currently high rate of refugee influx witnessed to White Nile, South and West Kordofan 1.853 M and East Darfur continues unabated. Internally Displaced People (IDPs) in South Sudan, including 223,994 Population of concern people in UNMISS Protection of Civilians site A total of 1,572,641 South Sudanese refugees as of 15 February 2017* FUNDING Uganda 748,603** USD 781.8 M Ethiopia 345,687 Requested by UNHCR in 2017 for the Sudan 313,110 South Sudan situation Kenya 92,540 USD 47.9 M DRC 71,062 Received by UNHCR as of 28 Feb 2017 CAR 1,639 Funded 6% New arrivals in 2016 New arrivals in 2017 (as of 15 Feb) Gap Ethiopia 53,661 4,865 94% Sudan 134,370 19,079 Uganda 489,234 106,244 *The population and arrival figures are Kenya 22,501 2,719 based on best available information at the time of production.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Dem Ocratic Republic of Congo Î
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! p ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! p ! ! ! ! ! p p ! p ! ! ! p 30°0'0"E 31°0'0"E 32°0'0"E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! p ! Makur-A gar Papu ! Awuol T hong Nwot Gut p ! Payii Nguenak ! ! ! ! ! ! Tut Tom ! ! ! ! Kool Cum Rumbek-Cueibet County Atiri u Malek ! ! Aluakluak ! Geng-Geng Jungun ! ! Panshui ! ! Kadul ! ! Mayom (Lakes) ! p ! Padak/Baidit ! ! ! ! Turam ok Met Baidit Panebei ! ! ! Thonic Di rjai ! ! ! Agany
    [Show full text]