New and Innovative Approaches to Monitoring Small-Scale Recreational Fisheries
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
New and innovative approaches to monitoring small-scale recreational fisheries Simon D. Conron, Daniel Grixti, Therese K. Bruce, Natalie F. Bridge, Khageswor Giri, Jeremy S. Hindell, and Terence I. Walker Project No. 2008/005 April 2014 Final Report to Fisheries Research and Development Corporation New and innovative approaches to monitoring small‐scale recreational fisheries Simon D. Conron, Daniel Grixti, Therese K. Bruce, Natalie F. Bridge, Khageswor Giri, Jeremy S. Hindell, and Terence I. Walker Fisheries Victoria, Department of Environment and Primary Industries 2a Bellarine Hwy, Queenscliff, Victoria 3225, Australia April 2014 Project Number No. 2008/005 FRDC Report 2008/005 © Fisheries Research and Development Corporation and Department of Environment and Primary Industries of Victoria. [2014] This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owners. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. ISBN 978‐1‐74326‐832‐2 (pdf) Preferred way to cite report. Conron, S. D., Grixti, D., Bruce, T. K., Bridge, N. F., Giri, K., Hindell, J. S., and Walker, T. I. (2014). New and innovative approaches to monitoring small‐scale recreational fisheries. Final report to Fisheries Research and Development Corporation Project No. 2008/005. April 2014. ii + 114 pp. Fisheries Victoria, Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Queenscliff, Victoria, Australia. Published by Fisheries Victoria, Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Queenscliff, Victoria, 3225, Australia Formatted/designed by Fisheries Victoria, Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Queenscliff, Victoria Printed by DEPI Queenscliff, Victoria DISCLAIMER The authors do not warrant that the information in this document is free from errors or omissions. The authors do not accept any form of liability, be it contractual, tortious, or otherwise, for the contents of this document or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed upon it. The information, opinions and advice contained in this document may not relate, or be relevant, to a readers particular circumstances. Opinions expressed by the authors are the individual opinions expressed by those persons and are not necessarily those of the publisher, research provider or the FRDC. The Fisheries Research and Development Corporation plans, invests in and manages fisheries research and development throughout Australia. It is a statutory authority within the portfolio of the federal Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, jointly funded by the Australian Government and the fishing industry. New approaches to monitoring recreational fisheries (Final report, April 2014) i FRDC Report 2008/005 Table of Contents 1. Non‐technical summary ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................................. 4 3. Background ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 4. Need ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 5. Objectives ................................................................................................................................................................ 6 6. Methods ................................................................................................................................................................... 6 6.1 Comparison of RAD and FIS methods ........................................................................................................ 7 6.2 Case studies of angler diary programs ....................................................................................................... 8 6.3 Information required for management of recreational fisheries ............................................................. 9 6.4 Utility of available monitoring methods for provision of robust data ................................................. 10 6.5 Power analysis for sampling intensity of RAD, GAD & FIS programs ................................................ 10 6.6 RAD, GAD and FIS cost‐benefit analysis .................................................................................................. 10 6.7 Tool kit for implementation of ‘angler‐diary’ programs ........................................................................ 10 7. Results and Discussion ........................................................................................................................................ 11 7.1 Comparison of RAD and FIS methods ...................................................................................................... 11 7.2 Case studies of angler diary programs ..................................................................................................... 12 7.3 Information required for management of recreational fisheries ........................................................... 12 7.4 Utility of available monitoring methods for provision of robust data ................................................. 14 7.5 Power analysis for sampling intensity of RAD, GAD & FIS programs ................................................ 14 7.6 RAD, GAD and FIS cost‐benefit analysis .................................................................................................. 15 7.7 Tool kit for implementation of ‘angler‐diary’ programs ........................................................................ 15 8. Benefits & Adoption ............................................................................................................................................ 18 9. Further Development .......................................................................................................................................... 18 10. Planned Outcomes ............................................................................................................................................. 19 11. Conclusions ......................................................................................................................................................... 22 12. References............................................................................................................................................................ 23 Appendix 1: Intellectual Property ......................................................................................................................... 25 Appendix 2: Staff ..................................................................................................................................................... 25 Appendix 3: Comparison of RAD and FIS methods ........................................................................................... 27 Appendix 4: RAD & GAD monitoring case studies ............................................................................................ 49 Appendix 5: New directions for monitoring recreational fisheries in Victoria .............................................. 81 Appendix 6: Recognition for value and utility of RAD program .................................................................... 111 Last page.................................................................................................................................................................. 114 New approaches to monitoring recreational fisheries (Final report, April 2014) ii FRDC Report 2008/005 1. Non‐technical summary 2008/005 New and innovative approaches to monitoring small‐scale recreational fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr James S. Andrews Leading Scientist Aquatic Sciences and Technical Services Fisheries Management and Science Branch (Fisheries Victoria) Department of Environment and Primary Industries DEPI Queenscliff Centre 2A Bellarine Highway, Queenscliff, Victoria, 3225 Tel: (03) 5258 0232 Fax: (03) 5258 0270 Email: [email protected] Outcomes achieved to date This study provides confidence in ‘research‐angler’ diary (RAD) and ‘general‐angler’ diary (GAD) programs as innovative approaches to monitoring small‐scale recreational fisheries. Both programs were found to be cost‐effective, scientifically robust if managed diligently, and supported by the angling community, fishery managers, and researchers as methods suitable for monitoring recreational fisheries. RAD and GAD programs can foster greater stewardship and engagement of stakeholders in the collection of information needed for fisheries management and sustainable use of key fisheries resources in recreational fisheries. Whilst such programs are reliable and most cost‐effective for monitoring any‐sized recreational fishery, they are particularly suited to providing data for assessment of small‐scale, data‐ poor recreational fisheries in estuarine and inland waters. Accepted by researchers across Australia, the findings from the present study resolved the debate about whether ‘angler‐diary’ data provide for satisfactory scientific rigour in monitoring