An Introduction to Jet Substructure and Boosted-Object Phenomenology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Introduction to Jet Substructure and Boosted-Object Phenomenology Looking inside jets: an introduction to jet substructure and boosted-object phenomenology Simone Marzani1, Gregory Soyez2, and Michael Spannowsky3 1Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`adi Genova and INFN, Sezione di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Italy 2IPhT, CNRS, CEA Saclay, Universit´eParis-Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 3Institute of Particle Physics Phenomenology, Physics Department, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK arXiv:1901.10342v3 [hep-ph] 17 Feb 2020 Preface The study of the internal structure of hadronic jets has become in recent years a very active area of research in particle physics. Jet substructure techniques are increasingly used in experimental analyses by the Large Hadron Collider collaborations, both in the context of searching for new physics and for Standard Model measurements. On the theory side, the quest for a deeper understanding of jet substructure algorithms has contributed to a renewed interest in all-order calculations in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). This has resulted in new ideas about how to design better observables and how to provide a solid theoretical description for them. In the last years, jet substructure has seen its scope extended, for example, with an increasing impact in the study of heavy-ion collisions, or with the exploration of deep-learning techniques. Furthermore, jet physics is an area in which experimental and theoretical approaches meet together, where cross-pollination and collaboration between the two communities often bear the fruits of innovative techniques. The vivacity of the field is testified, for instance, by the very successful series of BOOST conferences together with their workshop reports, which constitute a valuable picture of the status of the field at any given time. However, despite the wealth of literature on this topic, we feel that a comprehen- sive and, at the same time, pedagogical introduction to jet substructure is still missing. This makes the endeavour of approaching the field particularly hard, as newcomers have to digest an increasing number of substructure algorithms and techniques, too often characterised by opaque terminology and jargon. Furthermore, while first-principle cal- culations in QCD have successfully been applied in order to understand and characterise the substructure of jets, they often make use of calculational techniques, such as resum- mation, which are not the usual textbook material. This seeded the idea of combining our experience in different aspects of jet substructure phenomenology to put together this set of lecture notes, which we hope could help and guide someone who moves their first steps in the physics of jet substructure. 1 2 Acknowledgements Most of (if not all) the material collected in this book comes from years of col- laboration and discussions with excellent colleagues that helped us and influenced us tremendously. In strict alphabetical order, we wish to thank Jon Butterworth, Mat- teo Cacciari, Mrinal Dasgupta, Frederic Dreyer, Danilo Ferreira de Lima, Steve Ellis, Deepak Kar, Roman Kogler, Phil Harris, Andrew Larkoski, Peter Loch, David Miller, Ian Moult, Ben Nachman, Tilman Plehn, Sal Rappoccio, Gavin Salam, Lais Schunk, Dave Soper, Michihisa Takeuchi, Jesse Thaler, and Nhan Tran. We would also like to thank Frederic Dreyer, Andrew Lifson, Ben Nachman, Davide Napoletano, Gavin Salam and Jesse Thaler for helpful suggestions and comments on the manuscript. Contents 1 Introduction and motivation5 2 Introduction to QCD at Colliders 11 2.1 The theory of strong interactions . 11 2.2 Generalities on perturbative calculations . 16 2.3 Factorisation in the soft and collinear limits . 18 2.4 Infra-red and collinear safety . 22 2.5 Hadron collider kinematics . 24 3 Jets and jet algorithms 26 3.1 The concept of jets . 26 3.2 Sequential recombination algorithms . 28 3.3 Cone algorithms . 30 3.4 Experimental aspects . 33 3.5 Implementation . 37 4 Calculations for jets: the jet mass distribution 39 4.1 The one-loop calculation . 40 4.2 Going to all orders . 43 4.3 From e+e− to hadron-hadron collisions . 57 5 Jet substructure: concepts and tools 63 5.1 General guiding principles . 63 5.2 Assessing performance . 64 5.3 Prong-finders and groomers . 67 5.4 Radiation constraints . 72 5.5 Combinations of tools . 78 5.6 Other important tools . 81 5.7 Code Availability . 87 6 Calculations for the jet mass with grooming 88 6.1 mMDT/ SoftDrop mass . 88 3 CONTENTS 4 6.2 Other examples: trimming and pruning . 93 6.3 Comparison to Monte Carlo . 101 6.4 Calculations for signal jets . 106 7 Quark/gluon discrimination 113 7.1 Angularities, ECFs and Casimir scaling . 114 7.2 Beyond Casimir scaling with Iterated SoftDrop . 120 7.3 Performance and robustness . 124 8 Two-prong tagging with jet shapes 129 8.1 A dive into analytic properties . 129 8.2 Comparison to Monte Carlo simulations . 144 8.3 Performance and robustness . 148 9 Curiosities: Sudakov Safety 154 9.1 The groomed jet radius distribution θg ................... 155 9.2 The zg distribution . 157 10 Searches and Measurements 163 10.1 Tagging performance studies . 163 10.2 Measurements of jet observables . 168 10.3 Search for boosted Higgs boson in the SM . 172 10.4 Searches for new physics . 172 11 Take-home messages and perspectives 180 A Details of analytic calculations 183 B Details of Monte Carlo simulations 188 Bibliography 189 Chapter 1 Introduction and motivation The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN is the largest and most sophisticated ma- chine to study the elementary building blocks of nature ever built. At the LHC protons are brought into collision with a large centre-of-mass energy | 7 and 8 TeV for Run I (2010-13), 13 TeV for Run II (2015-18) and 14 TeV from Run III (starting in 2021) on- wards | to resolve the smallest structures in a controlled and reproducible environment. As protons are not elementary particles themselves, but rather consist of quarks and gluons, their interactions result in highly complex scattering processes, often with final state populated with hundreds of particles, which are measured via their interactions with particle detectors. Jets are collimated sprays of hadrons, ubiquitous in collider experiments, usually associated with the production of an elementary particle that carries colour charge, e.g. quarks and gluons. Their evolution is governed by the strong force, which within the Standard Model of particle physics is described by Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). The parton (i.e. quark or gluon) that initiates a jet may radiate further partons and produce a (collimated) shower of quarks and gluons, a so-called parton shower, that eventually turn into the hadrons (π, K, p, n,...) observed in the detector. The vast majority of LHC events (that one is interested in) contain jets. They are the most frequently produced and most complex objects measured at the LHC multipurpose experiments, ATLAS and CMS. When protons collide inelastically with a large energy transfer between them, one can formally isolate a hard process at the core of the collision, which involves one highly- energetic parton from each of the two protons. These two partons interact and produce a few elementary particles, like two partons, a Higgs boson associated with a gluon, a top{ anti-top pair, new particles, ... Since the energy of this hard process is large, typically between 100 GeV and several TeV, there is a large gap between the incoming proton scale and the hard process on one hand, and between the hard process and the hadron scale on the other. This leaves a large phase-space for parton showers to develop both in the initial and final state of the collision. This picture is clearly a simplification because we can imagine that secondary parton-parton interactions might take place. These multi- 5 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION AND MOTIVATION 6 parton interactions constitute what is usually referred to as the Underlying Event. To complicate things further, the LHC does not collide individual protons, but bunches of (1011) protons. During one bunch crossing it is very likely that several of the protons scatterO off each other. While only one proton pair might result in an event interesting enough to trigger the storage of the event on tape, other proton pairs typically interact to give rise to hadronic activity in the detectors. This additional hadronic activity from multiple proton interactions is called pileup. On average, radiation from pileup is much softer than the jets produced from the hard interaction, but for jet (and jet substructure) studies it can have a significant impact by distorting the kinematic relation of the jet with the hard process. In recent years the detailed study of the internal structure of jets has gained a lot of attention. At LHC collision energy electroweak (EW) scale resonances, such as the top quark, W/Z bosons and the Higgs boson, are frequently produced beyond threshold, i.e. their energy (transverse momentum) can significantly exceed their mass. Therefore, analyses and searching strategies developed for earlier colliders, in which EW- scale particles were produced with small velocity, have to be fundamentally reconsidered. Because EW resonances decay dominantly into quarks, when they are boosted, their decay products can become collimated in the lab-frame and result in one large and massive jet, often referred to as a fat jet. Initially such a configuration was considered disadvantageous in separating processes of interest (i.e. processes which included EW resonances) from the large QCD backgrounds (where jets are abundantly produced from high-energy quarks and gluons). However, with the popularisation of sequential jet clustering algorithms retaining the full information of the jet's recombination history, it transpired that one can use the internal structure of jets to tell apart jets that were induced by a decaying boosted EW resonance or by a QCD parton.
Recommended publications
  • ATLAS EXPERIMENT 15 3.1 the Large Hadron Collider
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO SEARCH FOR NEW PHENOMENA IN DIJET TOPOLOGIES FROM PROTON-PROTON COLLISIONS AT pS = 13 TEV A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE PHYSICAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS BY JEFFREY ROGERS DANDOY CHICAGO, ILLINOIS SEPTEMBER 2016 For my family TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT xvii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 THE STANDARD MODEL 3 2.1 Quantum Chromodynamics . .4 2.1.1 Hard Scatter . .8 2.1.2 Parton Shower . 11 2.1.3 Hadronization . 11 2.2 Motivation for New Physics . 12 3 THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT 15 3.1 The Large Hadron Collider . 15 3.1.1 LHC Operation . 17 3.2 The ATLAS Detector . 20 3.2.1 Inner Detector . 20 3.2.2 Calorimetry . 25 3.2.3 Electromagnetic Calorimeters . 27 3.2.4 Hadronic Calorimeters . 29 3.2.5 Muon Spectrometer . 35 3.2.6 Data Acquisition . 37 4 EVENT SIMULATION 39 4.1 QCD Simulation . 40 4.1.1 The Pythia Generator . 40 4.1.2 Monte Carlo Production . 42 4.2 Signal Models . 44 4.2.1 Excited Quark . 44 4.2.2 Dark Matter Mediators . 44 4.2.3 Heavy Boson . 46 4.2.4 Quantum Black Holes . 47 4.3 Monte Carlo Uncertainties . 49 iii 5 JET RECONSTRUCTION AND PERFORMANCE 52 5.1 Jet Reconstruction . 52 5.1.1 Topo-clusters . 53 5.1.2 Jet-finding . 54 5.2 Jet Calibration . 57 5.2.1 In-situ Jet Calibration . 60 5.2.2 Single Particle Response . 62 5.2.3 Corrections for 2015 data .
    [Show full text]
  • Jet Quenching in Quark Gluon Plasma: flavor Tomography at RHIC and LHC by the CUJET Model
    Jet quenching in Quark Gluon Plasma: flavor tomography at RHIC and LHC by the CUJET model Alessandro Buzzatti Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Columbia University 2013 c 2013 Alessandro Buzzatti All Rights Reserved Abstract Jet quenching in Quark Gluon Plasma: flavor tomography at RHIC and LHC by the CUJET model Alessandro Buzzatti A new jet tomographic model and numerical code, CUJET, is developed in this thesis and applied to the phenomenological study of the Quark Gluon Plasma produced in Heavy Ion Collisions. Contents List of Figures iv Acknowledgments xxvii Dedication xxviii Outline 1 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Quantum ChromoDynamics . .4 1.1.1 History . .4 1.1.2 Asymptotic freedom and confinement . .7 1.1.3 Screening mass . 10 1.1.4 Bag model . 12 1.1.5 Chiral symmetry breaking . 15 1.1.6 Lattice QCD . 19 1.1.7 Phase diagram . 28 1.2 Quark Gluon Plasma . 30 i 1.2.1 Initial conditions . 32 1.2.2 Thermalized plasma . 36 1.2.3 Finite temperature QFT . 38 1.2.4 Hydrodynamics and collective flow . 45 1.2.5 Hadronization and freeze-out . 50 1.3 Hard probes . 55 1.3.1 Nuclear effects . 57 2 Energy loss 62 2.1 Radiative energy loss models . 63 2.2 Gunion-Bertsch incoherent radiation . 67 2.3 Opacity order expansion . 69 2.3.1 Gyulassy-Wang model . 70 2.3.2 GLV . 74 2.3.3 Multiple gluon emission . 78 2.3.4 Multiple soft scattering .
    [Show full text]
  • Production and Hadronization of Heavy Quarks
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE LU TP 00–16 provided by CERN Document Server hep-ph/0005110 May 2000 Production and Hadronization of Heavy Quarks E. Norrbin1 and T. Sj¨ostrand2 Department of Theoretical Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden Abstract Heavy long-lived quarks, i.e. charm and bottom, are frequently studied both as tests of QCD and as probes for other physics aspects within and beyond the standard model. The long life-time implies that charm and bottom hadrons are formed and observed. This hadronization process cannot be studied in isolation, but depends on the production environment. Within the framework of the string model, a major effect is the drag from the other end of the string that the c/b quark belongs to. In extreme cases, a small-mass string can collapse to a single hadron, thereby giving a non- universal flavour composition to the produced hadrons. We here develop and present a detailed model for the charm/bottom hadronization process, involving the various aspects of string fragmentation and collapse, and put it in the context of several heavy-flavour production sources. Applications are presented from fixed-target to LHC energies. [email protected] [email protected] 1 Introduction The light u, d and s quarks can be obtained from a number of sources: valence flavours in hadronic beam particles, perturbative subprocesses and nonperturbative hadronization. Therefore the information carried by identified light hadrons is highly ambiguous. The charm and bottom quarks have masses significantly above the ΛQCD scale, and therefore their production should be perturbatively calculable.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.12. Ratio of the Inclusive B-Jet Measurement with the POWHEG+Pythia 6 Prediction
    Two b or not two b-jets Measurements of inclusive and dijet b-jet differential cross-sections with the ATLAS detector Stephen Paul Bieniek Supervisor: Prof. Nikos Konstantinidis University College London Submitted to University College London in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 21st June 2013. I, Stephen Bieniek confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 1 2 Acknowledgements There are many people who I would like to thank for helping me get through my PhD and I don’t have the space to list all of them. I would first like to thank my supervisor, Nikos Konstantinidis [1], for providing me the support, motivation and direction for this project. I would like to thank Eric Jansen [2] for being there to answer my questions, show me the ropes while I was learning everything and always being there for bouncing ideas off. I would like to thank Lynn Marx [3] who provided the competition I needed to motivate me to produce my best during my time at CERN and Sarah Baker [4] for keeping me company when working late. I’d like to thank my fellow PhD students Erin Walters [5] and Bobby Xinyue [6] who allowed me to keep things in perspective when the work was hard. I would also like to thank Daniel Lattimer [7] for helping me ease back into London life after my time away. As a last note, I would like to dedicate this thesis to Francis Corry.
    [Show full text]
  • Decays of the Tau Lepton*
    SLAC - 292 UC - 34D (E) DECAYS OF THE TAU LEPTON* Patricia R. Burchat Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University Stanford, California 94305 February 1986 Prepared for the Department of Energy under contract number DE-AC03-76SF00515 Printed in the United States of America. Available from the National Techni- cal Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161. Price: Printed Copy A07, Microfiche AOl. JC Ph.D. Dissertation. Abstract Previous measurements of the branching fractions of the tau lepton result in a discrepancy between the inclusive branching fraction and the sum of the exclusive branching fractions to final states containing one charged particle. The sum of the exclusive branching fractions is significantly smaller than the inclusive branching fraction. In this analysis, the branching fractions for all the major decay modes are measured simultaneously with the sum of the branching fractions constrained to be one. The branching fractions are measured using an unbiased sample of tau decays, with little background, selected from 207 pb-l of data accumulated with the Mark II detector at the PEP e+e- storage ring. The sample is selected using the decay products of one member of the r+~- pair produced in e+e- annihilation to identify the event and then including the opposite member of the pair in the sample. The sample is divided into subgroups according to charged and neutral particle multiplicity, and charged particle identification. The branching fractions are simultaneously measured using an unfold technique and a maximum likelihood fit. The results of this analysis indicate that the discrepancy found in previous experiments is possibly due to two sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies of Hadronization Mechanisms Using Pion Electroproduction in Deep Inelastic Scattering from Nuclei
    Studies of Hadronization Mechanisms using Pion Electroproduction in Deep Inelastic Scattering from Nuclei Will Brooks, Hayk Hakobyan, Cristian Peña, Miguel Arratia Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María Valparaíso, Chile for the CLAS collaboration related posters: π0, T. Mineeva; Σ-, G. & I. Niculescu • Goal: study space-time properties of parton propagation and fragmentation in QCD: • Characteristic timescales • Hadronization mechanisms • Partonic energy loss • Use nuclei as spatial filters with known properties: • size, density, interactions • Unique kinematic window at low energies Comparison of Parton Propagation in Three Processes DIS D-Y RHI Collisions Accardi, Arleo, Brooks, d'Enterria, Muccifora Riv.Nuovo Cim.032:439­553,2010 [arXiv:0907.3534] Majumder, van Leuween, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. A66:41, 2011, arXiv:1002.2206 [hep- ph] Deep Inelastic Scattering - Vacuum tp h tf production time tp - propagating quark h formation time tf - dipole grows to hadron partonic energy loss - dE/dx via gluon radiation in vacuum Low-Energy DIS in Cold Nuclear Medium Partonic multiple scattering: medium-stimulated gluon emission, broadened pT Low-Energy DIS in Cold Nuclear Medium Partonic multiple scattering: medium-stimulated gluon emission, broadened pT Hadron forms outside the medium; or.... Low-Energy DIS in Cold Nuclear Medium Hadron can form inside the medium; then also have prehadron/hadron interaction Low-Energy DIS in Cold Nuclear Medium Hadron can form inside the medium; then also have prehadron/hadron interaction Amplitudes for hadronization
    [Show full text]
  • Differences Between Quark and Gluon Jets As Seen at LEP 1 Introduction
    UA0501305 Differences between Quark and Gluon jets as seen at LEP Marek Tasevsky CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 28, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The differences between quark and gluon jets are stud- ied using LEP results on jet widths, scale dependent multi- plicities, ratios of multiplicities, slopes and curvatures and fragmentation functions. It is emphasized that the ob- served differences stem primarily from the different quark and gluon colour factors. 1 Introduction The physics of the differences between quark and gluonjets contin- uously attracts an interest of both, theorists and experimentalists. Hadron production can be described by parton showers (successive gluon emissions and splittings) followed by formation of hadrons which cannot be described perturbatively. The gluon emission, being dominant process in the parton showers, is proportional to the colour factor associated with the coupling of the emitted gluon to the emitter. These colour factors are CA = 3 when the emit- ter is a gluon and Cp = 4/3 when it is a quark. Consequently, U6 the multiplicity from a gluon source is (asymptotically) 9/4 higher than from a quark source. In QCD calculations, the jet properties are usually defined in- clusively, by the particles in hemispheres of quark-antiquark (qq) or gluon-gluon (gg) systems in an overall colour singlet rather than by a jet algorithm. In contrast to the experimental results which often depend on a jet finder employed (biased jets), the inclusive jets do not depend on any jet finder (unbiased jets). 2 Results 2.1 Jet Widths As a consequence of the greater radiation of soft gluons in a gluon jet compared to a quark jet, gluon jets are predicted to be broader.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to QCD and Jet I
    Introduction to QCD and Jet I Bo-Wen Xiao Pennsylvania State University and Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University Jet Summer School McGill June 2012 1 / 38 Overview of the Lectures Lecture 1 - Introduction to QCD and Jet QCD basics Sterman-Weinberg Jet in e+e− annihilation Collinear Factorization and DGLAP equation Basic ideas of kt factorization Lecture 2 - kt factorization and Dijet Processes in pA collisions kt Factorization and BFKL equation Non-linear small-x evolution equations. Dijet processes in pA collisions (RHIC and LHC related physics) Lecture 3 - kt factorization and Higher Order Calculations in pA collisions No much specific exercise. 1. filling gaps of derivation; 2. Reading materials. 2 / 38 Outline 1 Introduction to QCD and Jet QCD Basics Sterman-Weinberg Jets Collinear Factorization and DGLAP equation Transverse Momentum Dependent (TMD or kt) Factorization 3 / 38 References: R.D. Field, Applications of perturbative QCD A lot of detailed examples. R. K. Ellis, W. J. Stirling and B. R. Webber, QCD and Collider Physics CTEQ, Handbook of Perturbative QCD CTEQ website. John Collins, The Foundation of Perturbative QCD Includes a lot new development. Yu. L. Dokshitzer, V. A. Khoze, A. H. Mueller and S. I. Troyan, Basics of Perturbative QCD More advanced discussion on the small-x physics. S. Donnachie, G. Dosch, P. Landshoff and O. Nachtmann, Pomeron Physics and QCD V. Barone and E. Predazzi, High-Energy Particle Diffraction 4 / 38 Introduction to QCD and Jet QCD Basics QCD QCD Lagrangian a a a b c with F = @µA @ν A gfabcA A . µν ν − µ − µ ν Non-Abelian gauge field theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Subatomic- Particle Spectrometers∗
    IIT-CAPP-15/2 Introduction to Subatomic- Particle Spectrometers∗ Daniel M. Kaplan Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago, IL 60616 Charles E. Lane Drexel University Philadelphia, PA 19104 Kenneth S. Nelsony University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA 22901 Abstract An introductory review, suitable for the beginning student of high-energy physics or professionals from other fields who may desire familiarity with subatomic-particle detection techniques. Subatomic-particle fundamentals and the basics of particle in- teractions with matter are summarized, after which we review particle detectors. We conclude with three examples that illustrate the variety of subatomic-particle spectrom- eters and exemplify the combined use of several detection techniques to characterize interaction events more-or-less completely. arXiv:physics/9805026v3 [physics.ins-det] 17 Jul 2015 ∗To appear in the Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering. yNow at Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723. 1 Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Overview of Subatomic Particles 5 2.1 Leptons, Hadrons, Gauge and Higgs Bosons . 5 2.2 Neutrinos . 6 2.3 Quarks . 8 3 Overview of Particle Detection 9 3.1 Position Measurement: Hodoscopes and Telescopes . 9 3.2 Momentum and Energy Measurement . 9 3.2.1 Magnetic Spectrometry . 9 3.2.2 Calorimeters . 10 3.3 Particle Identification . 10 3.3.1 Calorimetric Electron (and Photon) Identification . 10 3.3.2 Muon Identification . 11 3.3.3 Time of Flight and Ionization . 11 3.3.4 Cherenkov Detectors . 11 3.3.5 Transition-Radiation Detectors . 12 3.4 Neutrino Detection . 12 3.4.1 Reactor Neutrinos . 12 3.4.2 Detection of High Energy Neutrinos .
    [Show full text]
  • News from the Precision Frontier at the LHC
    News from the Precision Frontier at the LHC Doreen Wackeroth [email protected]ffalo.edu Colloquium @ McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, January 25, 2017 HEPCOS@UB is a member of the LHC CMS collaboration and gratefully acknowledges funding by the U.S. National Science Foundation The Standard Model in a nutshell The physical world at the very fundamental level follows a symmetry principle: the strong and electroweak interactions of matter particles (leptons and quarks) are prescribed by gauge symmetries, i. e. the Lagrangian L = LQCD + LEW is form-invariant, L!L, under SU(3)color and SU(2)I =isospin × U(1)Y =hypercharge transformations of the matter and gauge fields. 1 a µν;a LQCD = − 4 Gµν G Pf j µ a λa j + j=1 q¯ (x)iγ (@µ + igs Gµ(x) 2 )q (x) P ¯ µ Yf b b LEW = f ΨL;f γ (i@µ − g1 2 Bµ + g2I Wµ )ΨL;f P µ (±1+yf ) + f a¯R;f γ (i@µ + g1 2 Bµ)aR;f 1 µν 1 b µν;b − 4 Bµν B − 4 Wµν W Glashow (1961) b Bµ : U(1) gauge field, Wµ; b = 1; 2; 3 : SU(2) gauge fields ΨL;f (aR;f ): SU(2) doublet(singlet) for left(right)-handed fermions Electroweak symmetry breaking in the Standard Model The mediators of the weak interaction, the W and Z bosons, are massive, but 2 b µ,b naively introducing mass terms in L such as M Wµ W breaks the electroweak symmetry of LEW . The mechanism of spontaneous symmetry breaking allows for simultaneously generating W and Z boson masses and preserving the gauge symmetry of LEW .
    [Show full text]
  • Search for New Physics in Dijet Resonant Signatures and Recent Results from Run 2 with the CMS Experiment
    138 Proceedings of the LHCP2015 Conference, St. Petersburg, Russia, August 31 - September 5, 2015 Editors: V.T. Kim and D.E. Sosnov Search for new physics in dijet resonant signatures and recent results from Run 2 with the CMS experiment GIULIA D’IMPERIO Universit`aLa Sapienza and INFN Roma On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Abstract. A search for narrow resonances in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of √s = 13 TeV is presented. The dijet invariant mass distribution of the two leading jets is measured with the CMS detector using early data from Run 2 of the Large Hadron Collider. The dataset presented here was collected in July 2015 and corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 42 1 pb− . The highest observed dijet mass is 5.4 TeV. The spectrum is well described by a smooth parameterization and no evidence for new particle production is observed. Upper limits at a 95% confidence level are set on the cross section of narrow resonances with masses above 1.3 TeV. When interpreted in the context of specific models the limits exclude: string resonances with masses below 5.1 TeV; scalar diquarks below 2.7 TeV; axigluons and colorons below 2.7 TeV; excited quarks below 2.7 TeV; and color octet scalars below 2.3 TeV. Introduction Deep inelastic proton-proton (pp) collisions often produce two or more energetic jets when the constituent partons are scattered with large transverse momenta (pT ). The invariant mass of the two jets with the largest pT in the event (the dijet) has a spectrum that is predicted by quantum chromodynamics (QCD) to fall steeply and smoothly with increasing dijet mass (m jj) [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Jet Finding and Jetography (1)
    Introduction to Jet Finding and Jetography (1) Gavin Salam CERN, Princeton University and LPTHE/Paris (CNRS) 2011 IPMU-YITP School and Workshop on Monte Carlo Tools for LHC Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Japan September 2011 [Introduction] [Background knowledge] Jets Jets are everywhere in QCD But not the same as partons: Our window on partons Partons ill-defined; jets well-definable Jets lecture 1 (Gavin Salam) MC tools for LHC school September 2011 2 / 30 [Introduction] [Background knowledge] Why do we see jets? Parton fragmentation Gluon emission: dE dθ α ≫ 1 quark Z s E θ At low scales: αs → 1 Jets lecture 1 (Gavin Salam) MC tools for LHC school September 2011 3 / 30 [Introduction] [Background knowledge] Why do we see jets? Parton fragmentation Gluon emission: dE dθ α ≫ 1 quark Z s E θ θ At low scales: gluon αs → 1 Jets lecture 1 (Gavin Salam) MC tools for LHC school September 2011 3 / 30 [Introduction] [Background knowledge] Why do we see jets? Parton fragmentation Gluon emission: dE dθ α ≫ 1 quark Z s E θ At low scales: αs → 1 Jets lecture 1 (Gavin Salam) MC tools for LHC school September 2011 3 / 30 [Introduction] [Background knowledge] Why do we see jets? Parton fragmentation Gluon emission: dE dθ α ≫ 1 quark Z s E θ At low scales: αs → 1 hadronisation non−perturbative Jets lecture 1 (Gavin Salam) MC tools for LHC school September 2011 3 / 30 [Introduction] [Background knowledge] Why do we see jets? Parton fragmentation Gluon emission: π+ dE dθ α ≫ 1 quark Z s E θ KL π0 At low scales: K+ − αs → 1 hadronisation
    [Show full text]