Malaria Chemoprevention with Monthly Dihydroartemisinin
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Kwambai et al. Trials (2018) 19:610 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2972-1 STUDY PROTOCOL Open Access Malaria chemoprevention with monthly dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the post-discharge management of severe anaemia in children aged less than 5 years in Uganda and Kenya: study protocol for a multi-centre, two-arm, randomised, placebo-controlled, superiority trial Titus K. Kwambai1,2,3* , Aggrey Dhabangi4, Richard Idro4, Robert Opoka4, Simon Kariuki1, Aaron M. Samuels5, Meghna Desai5, Michael Boele van Hensbroek6, Chandy C. John7, Bjarne Robberstad8, Duolao Wang3, Kamija Phiri9 and Feiko O. ter Kuile1,3 Abstract Background: Children hospitalised with severe anaemia in malaria endemic areas in Africa are at high risk of readmission or death within 6 months post-discharge. Currently, no strategy specifically addresses this period. In Malawi, 3 months of post-discharge malaria chemoprevention (PMC) with monthly treatment courses of artemether- lumefantrine given at discharge and at 1 and 2 months prevented 30% of all-cause readmissions by 6 months post- discharge. Another efficacy trial is needed before a policy of malaria chemoprevention can be considered for the post- discharge management of severe anaemia in children under 5 years of age living in malaria endemic areas. Objective: We aim to determine if 3 months of PMC with monthly 3-day treatment courses of dihydroartemisinin- piperaquine is safe and superior to a single 3-day treatment course with artemether-lumefantrine provided as part of standard in-hospital care in reducing all-cause readmissions and deaths (composite primary endpoint) by 6 months in the post-discharge management of children less than 5 years of age admitted with severe anaemia of any or undetermined cause. (Continued on next page) * Correspondence: [email protected] 1Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Centre for Global Health Research (CGHR), PO Box 1578, Kisumu 40100, Kenya 2Kisumu County Department of Health, Kenya Ministry of Health, Kisumu, Kenya Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Kwambai et al. Trials (2018) 19:610 Page 2 of 12 (Continued from previous page) Methods/design: This is a multi-centre, two-arm, placebo-controlled, individually randomised trial in children under 5 years of age recently discharged following management for severe anaemia. Children in both arms will receive standard in-hospital care for severe anaemia and a 3-day course of artemether-lumefantrine at discharge. At 2 weeks after discharge, surviving children will be randomised to receive either 3-day courses of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine at 2, 6 and 10 weeks or an identical placebo and followed for 26 weeks through passive case detection. The trial will be conducted in hospitals in malaria endemic areas in Kenya and Uganda. The study is designed to detect a 25% reduction in the incidence of all-cause readmissions or death (composite primary outcome) from 1152 to 864 per 1000 child years (power 80%, α = 0.05) and requires 520 children per arm (1040 total children). Results: Participant recruitment started in May 2016 and is ongoing. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02671175. Registered on 28 January 2016. Keywords: Malaria, Severe anaemia, Chemoprevention, Post-discharge, Readmission, Mortality, Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, Protocol, Cost-effectiveness Background malaria infections after discharge. These infections Severe anaemia, defined as haemoglobin (Hb) concentra- negate the initial rise in haemoglobin achieved by blood tion level below 5.0 g/dL or haematocrit below 15.0% transfusion, resulting in delayed haematological recov- [1], is a major public health problem in low and ery and potential rebound of severe anaemia and middle-income countries. Severe anaemia is associated death in some children [10, 15–17]. Furthermore, de- with approximately one third of hospital admissions layed haemolytic anaemia occurring 1 to 3 weeks among febrile children in sub-Saharan Africa, contribut- after artesunate treatment of falciparum malaria has ing substantially to paediatric morbidity and mortality, been reported in non-immune travellers [18, 19], al- especially in malaria endemic areas [2, 3]. Children though more recent studies show this to be rare in under 5 years of age are most vulnerable to the African children [20]. long-term effects of severe anaemia, including decreased Malaria control strategies in endemic and epidemic- cognitive performance and mental and motor develop- prone areas include intermittent preventive therapy ment [4]. Rates of in-hospital mortality due to severe an- (IPT). IPT is the administration of a full treatment aemia ranging from 4 to 12% have been reported in course using long-acting antimalarials at pre-defined different epidemiological settings [5–7]. In addition, time intervals irrespective of a patient’s malaria status to these reports indicate a high post-discharge mortality clear existing infections and to provide prolonged and morbidity, especially in the first 3 to 6 months. Lon- prophylaxis against new infections [21]. The World gitudinal follow-up of children aged less than 5 years ad- Health Organization (WHO) recommends IPT as a mal- mitted with severe anaemia in Malawi showed that 8.2% aria control strategy in malaria endemic areas for preg- died by 6 months post-discharge and 5.9% were readmit- nant women (IPTp) [22, 23], infants (IPTi) [24] and for ted with severe anaemia, compared to those without se- children in areas with seasonal malaria transmission vere anaemia, among whom 1.6% died and 0.5% were (‘seasonal malaria chemoprevention’, or SMC) [25]. Cur- readmitted [8, 9]. Similar high rates of post-discharge rently, no control strategy specifically addresses the mortality (10% by 8 weeks) were observed in malaria en- high-risk post-discharge period for children previously demic areas of western Kenya [10] and in Uganda, where treated for severe anaemia in malaria endemic areas. In 12% died or were readmitted within 6 months [11]. Malawi, 3 months of malaria chemoprevention with Standard in-hospital treatment of severe anaemia in three full treatment courses of artemether-lumefantrine, many countries in sub-Saharan Africa consists of a blood given in-hospital to children under 5 years of age admit- transfusion and parenteral artesunate for severe malaria ted with severe malarial anaemia, and at 1 and 2 months [12]. For severe malarial anaemia, this is completed with post-discharge, prevented 31% of deaths or readmissions a 3-day course of artemisinin-based combination therapy by 6 months post-discharge, and 30% of all-cause read- (ACT), usually artemether-lumefantrine. Children are missions [17]. These results are consistent with earlier often discharged with a short course of iron and folate, findings from The Gambia which showed that, in chil- typically with no further scheduled follow-up. Haemato- dren with severe anaemia, chemoprevention targeted logical recovery from malaria-associated anaemia takes during the malaria transmission season halved the rate at least 6 weeks [13, 14]. However, many children in of clinical malaria and reduced all-cause hospital re- these areas experience episodes of new or recrudescent admission by 78% in one trial and recurrence of severe Kwambai et al. Trials (2018) 19:610 Page 3 of 12 anaemia by 78% in another [26, 27]. These data indicate cost-effectiveness of PMC-DP compared to the current that malaria chemoprevention in the post-discharge standard of care. period may provide substantial health benefits. We are conducting an efficacy trial in Kenya and Design considerations Uganda to determine the efficacy and safety of 3 months Rationale for choice of DP for PMC of malaria chemoprevention post-discharge as a poten- Optimal antimalarial prophylaxis with maximum com- tially cost-effective strategy to reduce all-cause readmis- pliance would be provided by a regimen that is long act- sions and deaths in children admitted with severe ing so that administration is not required more anaemia. We hypothesise that, by creating a prophylactic frequently than monthly. Sulphadoxine, mefloquine and time-window post-transfusion for malaria, more time is DP have sufficiently long half-lives to be considered [28]. assured for bone marrow recovery, resulting in a more However, there is high-level resistance to sulphadoxine sustained haematological recovery post-discharge. in many parts of east and southern Africa, precluding its We refer to this strategy as post-discharge malaria che- use for this purpose in these malaria endemic areas [29]. moprevention (PMC) to illustrate the similarities with Both amodiaquine [30] and mefloquine are poorly toler- SMC rather than with IPT in pregnancy as it aims to pro- ated, which is an important consideration when provid- vide complete, rather than intermittent prophylaxis. ing drugs for malaria prevention to recipients with few or no symptoms