Bachmann & Cabrera: Types of Rev.Chrysomelidae Mus. Argentino Cienc. Nat., n.s.57 12(1): 57-80, 2010 Buenos Aires, ISSN 1514-5158

A catalog of the types of Chrysomelidae sensu lato (Insecta, Coleoptera, Polyphaga) deposited in the Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Buenos Aires

Axel O. BACHMANN1 & Nora CABRERA2

1Entomology Division, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires. e-mail: [email protected]. 2Entomology Division, Museo de La Plata. e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract: The type specimens (all current categories) of Chrysomelidae s.l. deposited in this Museum are listed; 125 names are recorded, 85 of them (68 percent) are represented here by name-bearing types (‘primary’ types), five of them dubious. The family is taken in its broadest sense, including the Bruchinae, Hispinae (along with the former Cassidinae), and other groups sometimes considered as separate families. The specific and subspecific names were alphabetically filed, followed by the generic ones as they were spelled in the original publication, or the generic and specific names in the case of subspecies and varieties. Later combinations and/or current binomina are mentioned insofar as these are known to the authors. Two lists are added: 1. of specimens labelled as types of unavailable names, chiefly those not found in the literature, and supposedly not published, and 2. of specimens labelled as types, but not originally included as such, and published or not after the original description.

Key words: Chrysomelidae, Coleoptera, type specimens, Argentina.

Resumen: Catálogo de los tipos de Chrysomelidae sensu lato (Insecta, Coleoptera, Polyphaga) depositados en el Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Buenos Aires. Se catalogan los ejemplares típicos, de todas las categorías aceptadas, de Chrysomelidae s.l. conservados en este museo; se registran 125 nombres, 85 de ellos (68 por ciento) representados aquí por tipos portadores de nombres (tipos ‘primarios’), cinco de ellos dudosos. La familia se toma en su concepto más amplio, incluyendo a las Bruchinae, las Hispinae (con las anteriores Cassidinae) y otros grupos a veces considerados como familias separadas. Los nombres específicos y subespecíficos fueron ordenados alfabéticamente; a estos siguen los de los géneros, así como se publicaron originalmente, o de los géneros y especies en el caso de las subespecies y variedades. Se mencionan las combinaciones ulteriores y/o los binomios en uso, hasta donde son conocidos por los autores. Se agregan dos listas: 1. de los ejemplares rotulados como tipos, de nombres no disponibles, principalmente aquellos no hallados en la bibliografía, y supuestamente no publicados, y 2. de los ejemplares rotulados como tipos, pero no incluidos originalmente como tales, publicados o no después de la descripción original.

Palabras clave: Chrysomelidae, ejemplares tipo, Argentina. ______

A catalog of the typical specimens (all current specific ones in the case of subspecies and varie- categories) of species of Chrysomelidae s.l. housed ties. An abbreviated bibliographic citation follows, in the Entomological Division of this Museum is as well as a listing of the types, if these were men- presented, referred to 125 names: 25 holotypes (four tioned, starting with those deposited in this Mu- of them dubious, they may be syntypes), 95 syntypes seum. An account of the type specimens actually (six of them dubious) of 55 names, 179 paratypes here housed follows, with their label data. Accord- (which include 6 allotypes). Of these 125 names, ing to the International Code of Zoological Nomen- 85 of them (68 percent) are here represented by clature (4th edition, 1999), allotypes are not ‘name- name-bearing types (‘primary types’). The family bearing types’. If the country is not mentioned, is here taken in its broadest sense, including the Argentina is meant; in every other case, the coun- Bruchinae, the Hispinae (with the former try is mentioned first. Some specimens bear a reg- Cassidinae) and other groups sometimes considered istration number, entered in the Entomology Divi- as separate families. The classification of Lawrence sion register; numbers under 10000 correspond to & Newton (1995) is here followed. the old general register of the Museum. Later Specific and subspecific names are alphabeti- nomenclatural or taxionomical changes are added, cally entered, as is usual in type specimen catalogs; insofar as these are known to the authors. each name is followed by the generic one, and the For the identification of types not formally des- subgeneric one if it was mentioned, spelled as it ignated in the original publication (art. 72.4 of the was in the original binomen, or by the generic and Code), evidences from the labels as they were writ- 58 Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, n. s. 12 (1), 2010 ten in the collections examined by authors of names, Monrós (1954: 99-102), of which some paratypes are considered. When the authors did not formally are said to be in MACN, BRC and GPC; 2. designate a holotype, or its equivalent, and did not Uroplata oglobini [sic] Monrós & Viana (1947: 288- mention how many specimens were examined, it is 289), of which some ‘cotypes’ are said to be in assumed that they had a series of syntypes (recom- MACN; 3. Stereoma laevicollis orophila Monrós mendation 73 F of the Code), eventually ‘sole (1954: 224-225), of which some paratypes are said syntypes’. to be in MACN and BRC; 4. Megalopus schaeferi Some specimens in the collection are labelled Monrós (1947c: 211-212), of which one paratypes as types of names not found in the literature, and is said to be in MACN ex ABC. assumed not to have been published. These names Unless otherwise stated, the specimens are are probably not available in the sense of the Code; glued to cards held by an entomological pin. however, in order to assist in future research, they This Museum is identified by MACN. Reposi- are separately listed. tories of other types are identified as follows: ABC, Specimens labelled as types, but not included Adolfo Breyer coll., in MACN; AMC, A. Martínez in the original publication, and specimens desig- coll., types now in MACN; APC, A. Prosen coll.; BC, nated as types after the original publication date, G. Bondar coll.; BEC, C. Berg coll., in MACN; BM, published or not, cannot be accepted as included in The Natural History Museum, London; BRC, C. the type series; however, also in order to assist in Bruch coll., in MACN; CM, Carnegie Museum; future research, they are included in a third list. CMSM, Colegio Máximo, San Miguel, B. Aires, later Burmeister did not label his types nor other Inesalt, now in Salta National University; CSC, specimens, save sometimes with locality labels; he Campos Seabra coll., Brasil; DC, Diringshofen coll.; put, to the left of the specimens or series, a hand- DEI, Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, Berlin- written identification label, fastened with pins to Eberswalde; DZSP, Dept. Zoologia, São Paulo, Brasil; the bottom of the drawer, and added sometimes a EEAT, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria, vague distribution indication, e.g. «Patagonia» or Tucumán, Argentina; ERJ, Instituto Experimental even «Argentina». The type condition is inferred Agrícola, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil; FIML, Fundación from the publications, and one of us (AOB) added e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Tucumán, Argentina; labels, handwritten on red cardboard, to the speci- FMNH, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, mens deemed to be holotypes or syntypes. U.S.A.; GKC, G. Kuschel coll.; GM, Genf Museum, Brèthes often marked his type specimens with Suisse; GPC, G. Pellerano coll., in MACN; HB, H. a small square piece of red paper, making their iden- Burmeister coll., in MACN; IIE, Imperial Institute tification in the drawers easier. of Entomology, London, U.K.; JBC, J. Bosq coll.; Bruch used to copy the specific names of the JBR, J. Brèthes coll., in MACN; JDC, J. Daguerre types on his own labels, most of them with a red coll.; MAC, M. Alvarenga coll., Brasil; MC, F. Monrós frame (a few with a green frame), and to add to the coll.; MCSN, Museo Civico de Scienze Naturale, same pin a small, folded piece of paper with the Genova, Italia; MF, Museum Frey, Tützing, Ger- name handwritten by the respective author, seem- many, now in NHMB; MG, Museu Goeldi, Manaus, ingly cut from a letter; frequently only a part of the Brasil; MLP, Museo de La Plata, La Plata, Argen- generic name, and/or a part of the author’s name tina; MNH, Museum Nationalis Hungaricus, Buda- are legible. pest, Hungary; MNHN, Muséum National d’Histoire Some specimens in the Bruch collection are la- Naturelle, Paris, France; MP, Museum Pragae, Czech belled as ‘cotypes’. If the author did not state how Rep.; MPA, Museu Paranaense; MRB, Musée Royal many specimens he had examined, they must be d’Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, Bruxelles, considered as syntypes. We suspect that some of Belgique; MVC, M. Viana coll., sold to Mr. J.E. the ‘cotypes’ in our Museum were not even included Barriga, Santiago, Chile; MZSP, Museu de Zoologia, in the typical series, but it is not possible to assure São Paulo, Brasil; NHMB, Natural History Museum, their condition. In order to assist in future research, Baden, Suisse; NHMW, Naturhistorisches Museum we include them in the present paper as syntypes Wien, Austria; PC, M. Pic coll., now in MNHN; RCC, or as paratypes, according to each context (Bruch R. Carcavallo coll.; SC, F. Spaeth coll.; SCT, used the term ‘Cotypus’ sometimes in the sense of Seminario Conciliar de Tucumán, Argentina; SKM, syntypus and sometimes in the sense of paratypus). Svenska Koniglik Naturhistoriska Museum, Stock- Lastly, one name (Probaenia crenata ab. interrupta holm, Sweden; USNM, United States National Monrós & Viana 1947: 273, pl. xxii: 91) although Museum, Washington, U.S.A.; WBC, W. Bokermann not an available name, is included within this list coll., Brasil; ZMB, Zoologisches Museum, Berlin, because of the same reason. Germany. No type specimens were found of 1. Abbreviations used: ab., aberratio; allot., Magalostomis (Scaphigenia) bubalus bubaloides allotypus (alotipo); coll., collection; cot., cotypus Bachmann & Cabrera: Types of Chrysomelidae 59

(cotypi, cotipo); f., figure; handwr., handwritten; leg. Alvarenga 25.IV.1950, holot.m, allot.f. in holot., holotypus (holotipo); leg., legit (legint); p., DZSP; 3 parat. MAC, 1 parat. CSC, 1 parat. MC. page; parat., paratypus (paratypi, paratipo); print., One parat., pinned, a leg glued to a pointed printed; spec., specimen (specimens); synt., card, «Coleção / M. Alvarenga / N 1503» printed; syntypus (syntypi, sintipo). «Natal / R.G. Norte Brasil / 25-IV-1950 / M. Alvarenga Coll.» print., date handwr.; «Paratipo» CATALOG OF THE TYPES handwr. on white paper with a red frame; «Megamerus / alvarengai / Monrós [handwr.] / F. achalay [Chlamisus]. Monrós 1952b: 592-594, f. Monrós det. 1955 [print.]» on pink paper with a 87, 136. La Rioja Prov.: Nonogasta, leg. M. Gómez, black frame. one parat. ex BRC. Holot. male, Salta Prov.: Coronel Moldes in MC, one parat. in USNM. anthracinus [Monachus]. Burmeister 1877: 62- One parat. «Nonogasta / Rioja / Gómez» 63. Patagonia, Río Negro Prov. (sic, pro Buenos handwr. by Bruch; «Col. / C. Bruch» print. with red Aires Prov.): Carmen de Patagones. ink; «53380» handwr., red frame; «Paratypus» print. One synt. without labels. On the bottom of the on yellow cardboard; «Chlamisus / achalay / mihi drawer a label reads «anthracinus Nob.». One of us [handwr.] / F. Monrós det. 1949 [print.]» on pink (AOB) added «Monachus / anthracinus / Burmeister paper. Ex BRC. 1877 / Typus» handwr. on red cardboard. Ex HB. Note: Blackwelder (1946: 643) records this spe- acuminatus [Cryptocephalus]. Jacoby 1908: 838. cies under Lexiphanes Gistl 1850 nom. nov. pro Tucumán; in addition one spec. in MLP. Monachus Déjean 1835, non Kaup 1829 nec One synt. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Tucumán / Fleming 1822. Leng (1918: 208) proposed 15.VII.1900 / C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; Monachulus as a replacement name. «Cotypus» print. on pale green paper; «Crypto- cephalus / acuminatus / Jac.» handwr. by Bruch, argentina [sub Argentina] [Coscinoptera]. red frame. Ex BRC. Burmeister 1877: 60-61. [Entre Ríos Prov.]: Paraná, and southern Corrientes Prov. acutangula [Hybosa]. Spaeth 1913: 163-164. Two synt., pinned, one of them «Parana / Febr.» Abundant in Paraguay; Brasil: Espiritu Santo, and print. on dark green paper, the other without la- Argentina: Misiones leg. Jörgensen. bels. One of us (AOB) added to both «Coscinoptera One synt., pinned, «Rep. Argentina / Gob. / argentina / Burmeister 1877 / Syntypus» handwr. Misiones / XI.1909 / C. Bruch» print., date handwr. on red cardboard. Ex HB. «Cotypus» print. on pale green paper; «Hybosa / Note: Moldenke (1981: 96) proposed the new acutangula / Spth.» handwr. by Bruch, red frame; subgenus Coleoguerina, assigning Coscinoptera «Hybosa / acutangula» handwr., cut. Ex BRC. argentina as the type species. albopilosa [Euryscopa]. Monrós 1954: 106-109, f. argentinensis [Chaetocnema]. Bryant 1951: 941- 146-154. Santiago del Estero Prov., 3 parat. ex 942, f. 4. Argent.: Est. Exp. Station XI.1948, 23 spec.; BRC. Holot.m, allot.f., several parat. Misiones [Entre Ríos Prov.]: Nogoyá XI.1948, leg. Hepper. Prov.: San Javier: Santa María, in MC; other parat. Eight synt.? parat.? on four cards on one pin; in BM, DEI, MLP, FIML, MVC, JBC, AMC. three paper disks, «Paratype», with yellow border; Three parat., two of them «Rep. Argentina / «Victoria E.R.-XI.48 / H.C. Hepper», «Maíz dulce- Prov. Santiago d. Estero / 190_ / C. Bruch» print., amargo / sorgo azucarado» handwr. by Hepper; black frame; the other one «Sgo. Estero» handwr.; «Com. Inst. Ent. / Coll. n°. [print.] 12021 [handwr.]»; «Paratipo» handwr. on white paper, with a red «53249» handwr., red frame; «Chaetocnema / frame; «Euryscopa / albopilosa / mihi [handwr.] / F. argentinensis / Bryant [handwr.] / G.E. Bryant det. Monrós det. 1950 [print.]» on pink paper, ex BRC. [print.]» on white paper. two parat. «Argentina / Buenos Aires / Pdo. de Puan Note: No types were formally designated, so a / Est. Felipe Solá / Coll. Martínez / Dic. 951 [952]» series of synt. should be assumed, but the speci- handwr. on white paper; «Euryscopa / albopilosa / mens are labelled «Paratypus», rending the cat- Monrós / Paratipo» handwr. with pencil. Ex AMC. egory doubtful. Note: Moldenke (1981: 92) described the new genus Coleorozena, assigning Euryscopa argentinensis [Mastostethus]. Jacoby 1904a: 65- albopilosa to it. 66. Tucumán, two spec. Two synt., pinned «Rep. Argentina / Prov. alvarengai [Megamerus]. Monrós 1956: 108-111, Tucumán / XII.1897 / C. Bruch» print., date 113, f. 1-13. Brasil: Rio Grande do Norte: Natal, handwr.; «Typus» print. on pale green paper; 60 Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, n. s. 12 (1), 2010

«Mastostethus / argentinensis / Jac. / Co-tipo» basalis [Araeostenus]. Brèthes 1922: 286-287. handwr. by Bruch, red frame. Ex BRC. [Paraná River Delta]: Islas del Tigre 26.II.1911. Holot., «Tuyuparé / 26.II.11 / J.B.» handwr. by argentinensis [Metallactus]. Jacoby 1908: 850- Brèthes, black frame; «Araeostenus / basalis / 851. Córdoba. Seemingly a single spec., as only one Brèthes», «type!» handwr. by Brèthes; a small measure was given. square piece of red paper. One of us (AOB) added Holot?, synt.? «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Córdoba «Holotypus» printed on red cardboard. Ex JBR. / 190_ / C. Bruch» print.; «Cotypus» print. on pale green paper; «Metallactus / argentinensis / Jac.» bicoloriceps [Anisostena]. Pic 1928a: 51-52. handwr. by Bruch, red frame. Ex BRC. Corrientes Prov.: San Roque, leg. Bosq, in BRC and Note: The ‘Cotypus’ label suggests that Jacoby JBC. examined more than one spec. One synt. «Corrientes / I.1921. De Carlo» handwr. by Bruch; «Col. / C. Bruch» print.; «50940» argentinus [Cryptocephalus]. Jacoby 1908: 844. handwr., red frame; «Typus» print. on red card- Buenos Aires, received from MLP. board; «Anisostena / bicoloriceps / Pic» handwr. by One synt., «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Buenos Aires / Bruch, red frame; «Anisostena / bicoloriceps» 27.XI.1904 / C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; «Cotypus» handwr., cut; «Anisostena / (Neostena) / bicoloriceps print. on pale green paper; «Cryptocephalus / / Pic / Det. M. Viana [handwr.] / Museo Argentino argentinus / Jac.» handwr. by Bruch, red frame. Ex de Ciencias Naturales [print.] [obverse] / X-1947 BRC. [handwr.] [reverse]» on white cardboard. Ex BRC. Notes: The collector’s name differs, but other- atra [Octhispa]. Weise 1922: 32. Prov. Buenos wise the labels seem authentic. Included in Aires, ex BRC. subgenus Anisostena (Neostena) by Monrós & Viana Holot. «Typus» print. on pale green paper; (1947: 204-206), who consider Charistena «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Buenos Aires / 190_ / C. elongaticeps Pic 1928 as a synonym. Descarpentries Bruch» print.; «Dibujado» [drawn] handwr.; & Villiers (1959) state no type is in PC. «51056» handwr, red frame; «Octhispa / atra / Ws.» handwr. by Bruch, red frame; «Octhis / atra» bisignata [Mecistomela (Coraliomela) vicina var.]. handwr., cut; «Nanocthispa / atra (Weise) / Det. M. Berg 1900: 256. Bolivia, in MACN. Viana [handwr.] / Museo Argentino de Ciencias Holot., pinned «Bolivia / S. Mart.» handwr. on Naturales [print.] [obverse] / X-1947 [handwr.] [re- green paper, reverse white; «Col. / Antigua» print. verse]» on white cardboard. Ex BRC. on pale yellowish paper; «51105» handwr., red Note: Recorded as Nanocthispa atra by Monrós frame; «Typus» print. on red paper; «var. bisignata & Viana (1947: 313, pl. xxvi: 116), who state to have Berg», «vicina (Guér.)», handwr. by Berg on yellow- examined the type. ish paper. Notes: Currently included in Coraliomela. This atricornis [Probaenia]. Pic 1927: 9. Argentina, in variety was not dealt with by Monrós & Viana BRC and PC. (1947). Two synt. on cards, on one pin, «Typus» handwr. on pale green paper; «Alta Gracia. La bivitticollis [Cryptocephalus]. Jacoby 1908: 838- Granja / Sierras de Córdoba / 16.II.927. C. Bruch 839. Argentina, perhaps a single spec., as only one leg.» print., date handwr.; «51026» handwr., red measure is given. frame; «Col. / C. Bruch» print.; «Probaenia / Holot.?, synt.? «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Bue- atricornis / Pic» handwr. by Bruch, red frame; nos Aires / I.1895 / C. Bruch» printed, date handwr.; «Probaenia / atricornis» handwr., cut; «Uroplata / «Cotypus» print. on pale green paper; (Cardiohispa) / jucunda / Chap. / Det. M. Viana «Cryptocephalus / bivitticollis / Jac.» handwr. by [handwr.] / Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bruch, red frame. Ex BRC. [print.] [obverse] / X-1947 [handwr.] [reverse]» on Note: The «Cotypus» label suggests that Jacoby white cardboard. Ex BRC. could have seen more than one spec. Notes: Transferred to Uroplata by Uhmann (1937a: 457). A synonym of Uroplata (Cardiohispa) brittocostai [Chlamisus]. Bokermann 1962a: 277. jucunda Chapuis 1877, after Monrós & Viana (1947: 3 f. (1018-1020), 1 m (1021), without other data. 295-296, pl. xxv: 107). Descarpentries & Villiers Three parat. «Coleção Bokermann», print. on (1959: 150) state thet they examined the ‘holotype’ red paper; «George Oeterer / São Paulo - Brasil / in the Pic collection, and that it comes from Córdoba 23-X-1961 / Werner col.», print., date handwr.; Prov. «Chlamisus / brittocostai / Paratipo f [on two], [m Bachmann & Cabrera: Types of Chrysomelidae 61 on the other] [handwr.] / Bokermann det. 1962 Two synt., one of them «Buen / Ayres» print. [print.]» on red paper; «1019» [«1020», «1021»] , on green paper, the other without labels. One of us typed, the last one ex AMC. (AOB) added to both «Cryptocephalus / carbonarius / Burmeister 1877 / Syntypus» handwr. on red card- brochoni [Plectonycha]. Brèthes 1925: 15-16. board. Ex HB. Santa Fe, Brochon leg. Holot. «Sta Fe / L. Brochon» handwr.; carinipennis [Exema]. Monrós 1952b: 653-655, f. «Repreparo / M. Viana / I-1960» handwr.; «2531» 160, 165, 169. Corrientes Prov.: Santo Tomé leg. G. handwr.; «Plectonycha / Brochoni / Brèthes» Pellerano, 1 parat. in MACN. Holot. Brasil: São handwr. by Brèthes. One of us (AOB) added Paulo: Morumbí, leg. Nick, in FIML, several parat. «Typus» printed on pink cardboard. Ex JBR. in MP, MG, MC, MVC. Note: Monrós (1947b: 47, 53, 62-63, f. 9) states One parat. «S. Tomé / Corrientes / 10-923» having examined the holot. and several parat. from print., date handwr., black frame; «53397» handwr., the same locality, from JBR. red frame; «Paratypus» print. on yellow cardboard; «Exema / carinipennis / mihi [handwr.] / F. Monrós bruchi [Cephalodonta]. Weise 1904: 443. Buenos det. 1950 [print.]» on pink paper. Ex GPC. Aires Prov. 10.V.1897, several spec. ex BRC. Note: Chûjô (1955: 56) considers Exema as a One synt. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Buenos Aires junior synonym of Chlamisus. Karren (1966: 651) / 10.V.1897 / C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; «Col. / C. considers both generic names as valid. Bruch» print.; «50927» handwr., red frame; «Typus» print. on red paper; «Cephalodonta / Bruchi / Weise carnegianus [Chlamisus]. Bokermann 1964: 73- - tipo» handwr. by Bruch, red frame; «Cephalodonta 75, f. 30-34. Brasil: Mato Grosso: Cuiabá 7.XII.1962, / Bruchi m.» handwr., cut; «Sceloenopla / (Pseudispa) holot. m, allot.f, 2 m parat. in WBC; M. Grosso: [sic] / bruchi Weise / Det. M. Viana [handwr.] / Museo Corumbá, 1 parat. CM; Chapada de Guimarães Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [print.] [obverse] / 27 parat. in CM, MG; Bahia: 2 parat. BM, CSC; X-1947 [handwr.] [reverse]» on white cardboard with Amazonas: Teffé, 2 parat. WBC, CSC; Pará, 1 a black frame. Ex BRC. parat. BM; Amapá: Porto Santana in MG; Bolivia: Note: Monrós & Viana (1947: 189-190, pl. iii: Pando: Riberalta in WBC, APC. 13) examined the «type series» in MACN, and trans- One parat. «Coleção / Bokermann» print. on ferred the species to Sceloenopla (Pseudispa) [sic, red paper, black frame; «Chapada / Brasil / Acc. Nº pro Pseudhispa]. They put another spec. in BRC, 2966», «Nov.» print., both fastened to a white label taken after the publication date, and not labelled with a black frame; «2246» typed. 1 parat. as a type. «Riberalta / Pando - Bolivia / XI-956, Prosen» photogr. from typed; «21215» handwr. Both: bruchi [Stethispa]. Weise 1906: 224. Misiones Prov. «Chlamisus / carnegianus / paratipo f [handwr.] / V.1895. Bokermann det. 1963 [print.]» on red paper, black Holot. «Rep. Argentina / Gob. Misiones / 5.1895 frame. Ex AMC. / C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; «Col. / C. Bruch» print. «Typus» print. on red paper; «Stethispa / chapadiensis [Chlamisus]. Bokermann 1962b: Bruchi / Weise. tipo» handwr. by Bruch, red frame; 159-161, f. 16-20. Brasil: Mato Grosso: Chapada do «Stethispa / Bruchi m.» handwr., cut; «Stethispa / Guimarães, 220 ex., 210 of them leg. Oliveira 24- bruchi Weise / Det. M. Viana [handwr.] / Museo 29.X.1961, holot.f, allot. m in copula, 5 m, 4 f Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [print.] [obverse ] parat. in CSC; 115 m, 84 f parat. in WBC. 10 / X-1947 [handwr.] [reverse]». Ex BRC. further parat. leg. Bechyné 25.I.1961 and 1.II.1961, in MG, WBC. bruchii [Rhinotmetus]. Bowditch 1915: 490. Bue- Three parat. «Coleção Bokermann» print. on nos Aires Prov., several spec. ex BRC; ex 2d coll. red paper; «Chap. do Guimarães / M. Grosso- Brasil Jacoby sub 28c. / 24-29-X-1961 F.M. Oliveira col.» print.; «1487», One synt. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Buenos Aires «1488» and «1489» respectiv., typed; «Chlamisus / / IV.1896 [?] / C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; chapadiensis / Paratipo m [handwr.]/ Bokermann «Typus» print. on pale green paper; «Rhinotmetus det. 1962 [print.]» on red paper. The last one ex / Bruchii / Bowd.» handwr. by Bruch, red frame; AMC. «Rhinotmetus / Bruchii / nov. spec. Bow.» handwr., cut. Ex BRC. cleroides [Cylindrodachrys]. Monrós 1944: 149- 151, f. 1a. Several spec. Catamarca Prov.: Belén: carbonarius [Cryptocephalus]. Burmeister 1877: La Ciénaga, leg. Weiser & Wolters, ex BRC; 1 spec. 64-65. Buenos Aires. San Luis Prov. ex BRC; 1 spec. Paraguay, sub 45093. 62 Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, n. s. 12 (1), 2010

Holot. and allot. Catamarca Prov.: Pomán: Colpes daguerrei [Octotoma]. Pic 1930: 45-46. Buenos V.1942 in MC; 4 parat. Santiago del Estero Prov.: Aires Prov.: Rosas, leg. Daguerre, in BRC and PC. Campo Gallo III.1943 (2 in APC, 2 in MC). 2 spec. One synt. «Typus» handwr. by Bruch on pale Catamarca Prov. in JBC. 3 spec. La Rioja Prov. in green paper; «Rosas F.C. Sud / Provincia de Buenos JBC. 6 spec. from different localities in MVC. No Aires / Juan B. Daguerre» print.; «Col. / C. Bruch» other types formally designated. print.; «51030» handwr., red frame; «Octotoma / Twelve parat. glued to cards, on 7 pins (2 with Daguerrei / Pic [handwr.] / C. Bruch determ. one, 5 with two) «La Ciénaga (Belén) / Catamarca [print.]» on white paper, black frame; «Octotoma / 1925 / Weiser Wolters leg.» print., 2 of the labels only Daguerrei n. sp.» handwr., cut; «Uroplata / «192_»; «Col. / C. Bruch» printed; «Paratipo» handwr. (Codiohispa) / daguerrei (Pic) / Det. M. Viana on white paper, red frame; «Cylindrodachrys / [handwr.] / Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales cleroides / mihi [handwr.] / F. Monrós det. 1945 [one [print.] [obverse] / X-1947 [handwr.] [reverse]» on of them 1946] [print.]» on pink paper; 1 parat. id. white cardboard, black frame. One of us (AOB) but «La Ciénaga / Catam. Wolters» handwr. by Bruch; added «Syntypus» handwr. on red paper. Ex BRC. 1 parat. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. San Luis / 190_ / C. Notes: Transferred to Uroplata by Uhmann Bruch» print.; «Paratipo» and «Cylindrodachrys / (1938: 370). Included in Uroplata (Codiohispa) by cleroides / mihi» as the former; 1 parat. «45093» Monrós & Viana (1947: 292-293, pl. xxiv: 98), who handwr., red frame [the entry 45093 in the register state to have examined this type. There is no type of the Entomological Division of the Museum reads designation in the original description, neverthe- «Paraguay VI.1939», bought to Pedro Willin]; less Descarpentiers & Villiers (1959) mention «Paratipo» and «Cylindrodachrys / cleroides / mihi» that the holotype of this species is deposited in as the former. Ex BRC. the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle in Note: Except for the holot. and the allot., all Paris. Staines & Staines (1997:7) mention that other spec. were recorded as «ejemplares» [spec.], eight specimens from the Daguerre collection so rendering it uncertain if they were intended to are deposited in the USNM, and that these conform the type series. USNM plus Paris spec. should be considered as syntypes. concinus [Chlamisus]. Bokermann 1964: 79-80, f. 45-49. Brasil: Minas Gerais: Jaboticatuba: Serra do decolorata [Temnodachrys (Eudachrys)]. Monrós Cipó leg. Martínez XII.1962, holot. m, allot. f, 5 1954: 204-205, f. 310. Santiago del Estero Prov. 2 f, 3 m parat. in WBC, 1 m, 1 f in AMC. parat. in BRC. Holot. Santiago del Estero Prov.: Two parat. «Serra do Cipó / M. Gerais - Brasil Colonia Dora in APC. / XI.1962 / A. Martínez col.» handwr., black frame; Two parat. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Santiago «2167» [2162] typed; «Chlamisus / concinus / d. Estero / 190_ / C. Bruch» print.; «Col. / C. paratipo m [f] [handwr.] / Bokermann det. 1963 Bruch» print.; «Paratipo» handwr. on white pa- [print.]» on red paper, black frame. Ex AMC. per, red frame; «Dachrys / decolorata / mihi [handwr.] / F. Monrós det. 1951 [print.]» on pink coscaroni [Eugenysa]. Viana 1968: 9, 13, 23-28, paper. Ex BRC. 96, pl. i: 4, pl. v: 30. Panamá: cerro Campana XI.1963 leg. Coscarón, holot. m, allot. f in MACN. Parat. densepunctata [Urodera hamatifera ssp.]. Monrós in USNM. 1954: 243, f. 359. Jujuy Prov., 15 parat. ex BRC; 1 Holot. m , allot. f, the f with an antenna parat. Chaco Prov.; 1 parat. Misiones Prov.: Puerto glued to a further card, «Cº Campana PA / XI-63 Aguirre, leg. Hayward; 2 parat. without locality Coscarón» handwr.; «Holotypus», [Allotypus]», label, leg. Girard, all these in MACN. Holot. Salta: print. on red cardboard; «Eugenysa / coscaroni / Güemes, leg. Martínez in MC, other parat. in MLP, Viana n. sp. [handwr.] / Museo Argentino de FIML, MC. Ciencias Naturales [print.] [obverse] / Det. M. Viana Fifteen parat., pinned «Rep. Argentina / Prov. / IV.1967 Holotipo [Alotipo] [handwr.] [reverse]» on Jujuy / 190_ / C. Bruch» print.; ex BRC. 1 parat., red cardboard. pinned «Chaco» handwr. on green paper, reverse white; «7725» handwr, red frame; 1 parat., pinned coya [Chlamisus]. Monrós 1952b: 604-606, f. 91, «Puerto Aguirre / Misiones - Arg. / Hayward 1934» 141. Jujuy Prov., holot. in MACN. print., hardly legible; «Col. / A. Breyer» print.; 1 Holot. «Jujuy» handwr. on green paper, reverse parat., pinned «R.A. Sgo / 1906 Girard» handwr.; white; «53386» handwr., red frame; «Holotypus» «16773» handwr., red frame, this one ex ABC. All: print. on red paper; «Chlamisus / coya / mihi «Paratipo» handwr. on white paper, red frame; «U. [handwr.] / F. Monrós det. 1948 [print.]» on pink hamatifera / ssp. densepunctata / mihi [handwr.] / paper. F. Monrós det. 1951 [print.]» on pink paper. Bachmann & Cabrera: Types of Chrysomelidae 63 difficilis [Anoplitis]. Monrós & Viana 1947: 210- parat.; Chaco Prov. 2 parat.; Chaco Prov.: 211, pl. xi: 39. Misiones Prov.: Loreto, leg. Ogloblin, Resistencia XII.1935 leg. Daguerre; 3 parat.; 2 cot. in MACN; other cot. Bolivia: Chulumani, Córdoba Prov. 1 parat. ex BRC; Córdoba Prov. 1 leg. Denier in MLP; Misiones Prov.: Loreto in MC; parat. det. U. sobrina, ex HB; Córdoba Prov.: Río Misiones Prov.: San Javier in MLP; Entre Ríos Cuarto 1 parat.; Catamarca Prov. 1 parat.; Santa Prov.: Paraná, leg. Bridarolli, on Canavalia Fe Prov.: Fives Lille 25.X.1923, 12 parat. ex BRC; 2 ensiformis. parat. without locality label, one of them «det. U. One synt. «Dibujado» [drawn] handwr.; van», ex HB. All of these in MACN. Holot. m, al- «Misiones. Loreto / 11.1936 [obverse] / Bosq [re- lot. f from Santa Fe Prov.: Fives Lille leg. Caride in verse]» handwr. by Bosq; «s/hojas Canavalia» MC. Other parat. in MLP, FIML, MC, APC, MVC. handwr.; «51124» handwr., red frame. 1 synt. Six parat., three of them separately pinned, «Parana / I-29/ Gomez del Rio C.I.» print.; «51125» three glued to one card «S. Tomé / Corrientes / 10- handwr., red frame. Both «Cotypus» print. on red 923 [on one, pinned, 11-926 on two, pinned, 10-928 cardboard; «Anoplites / difficilis / Monros-Viana / on the three glued, respectiv.]», print., dates Cotipo [handwr.] / Museo Argentino de Ciencias handwr., black frame; «Paratipo» handwr. on white Naturales [print.]» on red cardboard with a black paper, red frame; «Urodera / duplicata / mihi frame. [handwr.] / F. Monrós det. 1953 [print.]» on pink Notes: Butte (1967: 219) considers Anoplites as paper, ex GPC three parat. glued to cards, on one a synonym of Chalepus. Gaedicke & Döbler (1971: pin «Chaco / Argentina parat., / Dep. Resistencia / 347) examined another synt. in DEI. X-XII-935 / J.B. Daguerre», print.; «46187» handwr., red frame. one parat., pinned, «Chaco» handwr. diringshofeni [Eugenysa]. Viana 1968: 7, 14, 32- on green paper; «6882» handwr., red frame. one 36, 97, pl. ii: 7, pl. v: 33. Brasil: Pará: Obidos VII.1956 parat. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Córdoba / 16.II.1902 leg. Oliveira, holot. m, allot. f in MACN ex AMC; / C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; «Jac. ¥» handwr.; parat. in AMC, CSC, RCC, DC. «Col. / C. Bruch» print.. one parat., pinned Holot., allot., two parat. «Brasil. Eo de Pará / «Cordova» print. on green paper; «Col. / Antigua» Obidos / Oliveira leg. / Coll. Martínez / Jul. 956» print.. one parat., pinned «Rio 4º / Cordob.» handwr. «Holotypus» [«Allotypus», «Paratypus»] handwr.; one parat. «Catamarca» handwr. on green print. on red [red, yellow] cardboard; 1 parat. paper, «10210» handwr., red frame. eleven parat. «Ovidos [sic] / Amazonas IV-38» handwr.; «Cass. 16 on cards, on five pins (two with three, two with two, / Obidos, Amaz. / 4.38 Pohl» handwr.; «Paratypus» one with one) «Fives Lille / S. Fe» with different as the former. 2 parat. «Coleção Campos Seabra» dates, handwr.; one parat. on a card «Rep. Argen- print., one of them «Obidos. Pará. Brasil. IX.1964 / tina / Prov. Santa Fe / 190_ / C. Bruch» print.. one F.M. Oliveira» print. on yellow paper; the other parat., pinned, without locality label, «Col. / Anti- «Colonia Rio Branco / Obidos. Pará / Brasil IX.1953 gua», print.. one parat. without locality label, / F.M. Oliveira» print. on yellow paper, both «6646» handwr., red frame. All: «Paratipo» handwr. «Paratypus» as the former. 1 parat. «Brasil. on white paper, red frame; «Urodera / duplicata / Amazonas. Obidos», «X-1954. A. Martínez» handwr. mihi [handwr.] / F. Monrós det. 1953 [print.]» on on white paper, «Paratypus» as the former. All pink paper. «Eugenysa / diringshofeni / Viana Holotipo m Note: Moldenke (1981: 111) described the [Alotipo f, Paratipo.] [obverse] / M. Viana X-1968 subgenus Paraurodera (Torourodera) and trans- [reverse]» handwr. on red, red, and yellow card- ferred Urodera duplicata to it. board with black frames. Allot. ex AMC. ebeninus [Monachus]. Burmeister 1877: 63. divisus [Metallactus]. Jacoby 1908: 853. Argentina: Patagonia: Santa Cruz River. Chaco Prov., m. One synt. «S. Cruz / Patagonia» print. on green Holot.?, synt.? «Rep. Argentina / Gob. Chaco / paper; on the bottom of the drawer a label reads 190_ / C. Bruch» printed; «Cotypus» printed on pale «ebeninus Nob.» handwr. by Burmeister. Ex HB. green paper; «Metallactus / divisus / Jac.» handwr. Notes: Currently in Lexiphanes Gistl 1850 nom. by Bruch, red frame. Ex BRC. nov. pro Monachus Déjean 1835, Chevrolat 1837, Note: It is not clear how many spec. were non Fleming 1822 nec Kaup 1829. Leng (1918: 208) examinated by Jacoby: he gives only one measure- proposed Monachulus as a replacement name. ment, but the «Cotypus» label suggests more than one spec. elongaticeps [?Charistena]. Pic 1928b: 101-102. Salta 15.II.1905, in BRC. duplicata [Urodera]. Monrós 1954: 249-250, f. 371. Holot. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Salta / 15.II.1905 Corrientes Prov.: Santo Tomé, leg. G. Pellerano 4 / C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; «Col. / C. Bruch» 64 Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, n. s. 12 (1), 2010 print.; «Typus» print. on red paper; «Charistena / fasciata [Probaenia]. Weise 1906: 225. Brasil elongaticeps / Pic» handwr. by Bruch, green frame; IX.1901, ex BRC. «?Charistena / elongaticeps» handwr., cut; One synt. «Typus» print. on pale green paper; «Anisostena / (Neostena) / bicoloriceps / Pic / Det. «Rep. Brasil / IX.1901 / C. Bruch» print., date M. Viana [handwr.] / Museo Argentino de Ciencias handwr.; «Col. / C. Bruch» print.; «Probaenia / Naturales [print.] [obverse] / X.1947 [handwr.] [re- fasciata / Weise-tipo» handwr. by Bruch, red frame; verse]» on white paper with a black frame. Ex BRC. «Probaenia / fasciata m.» handwr., cut. Ex BRC. Notes: Monrós & Viana (1947: 204-206, pl. xii: 46) examined the types, and synonymized the name fasciatus [Xenochalepus bicostatus ab.? b]. Weise with Anisostena (Neostena) bicoloriceps Pic 1928. 1922: 31. Paraguay: Santa Trinidad leg. Zürcher Descarpentries & Villiers (1959) stated that there VIII.1913 (unavailable name). is no type in PC. fasciatus [Xenochalepus (Hemichalepus) bicostatus subsp.]. Monrós & Viana 1947: 245, pl. euryscopoides [Coscinoptera]. Monrós 1954: 127- xix: 72. 128, f. 205. Santiago del Estero Prov., leg. Girard, Holot. «Dibujado» [drawn] handwr.; «Paraguay two parat. in MACN. Holot. m, allot. f., sev- / Sa. Trinidad / VIII-1913» print., date handwr.; eral parat. Salta Prov.: Güemes, in MC and FIML; «Col. / C. Bruch» print.; «50975» handwr., red frame; other parat. in APC, AMC. «X. bicostatus / ab. fasciatus / Ws.?» handwr. by Two parat., pinned «R.A. Sgo. / 1906 [1907]» Bruch, red frame; «bicostat ab. fascia?» handwr., handwr. with red and black ink respectiv.; «16784» cut; «Xenochalepus / (Hemichalepus) / bicostatus / handwr., red frame; «Paratipo» handwr. on white Weise / Det. M. Viana [handwr.] / Museo Argentino paper, red frame; «Coscinoptera / euryscopoides / de Ciencias Naturales [print.] [obverse] / X-1947 mihi [handwr.] / F. Monrós det. 1950 [print.]» on [handwr.] [reverse]» on white paper, black frame. pink paper, one of them in addition «Euryscopa / Note: The name is unavailable as from Weise proxima / Lacord.» handwr. One parat. glued to a 1922 (it was published as a dubious ‘aberration’). card «R.A. Salta / Güemes / I-950 / Coll. Martínez» Monrós & Viana (1947: 245, pl. xix: 72) examined handwr. on white paper, black frame; «Paratipo / the holot., and redescribed it as a subspecies, so f » handwr., red frame; «Coscinoptera / conferring availability. euryscopoides / mihi [handwr.] / F. Monrós det. 1950 [print.]» on pink paper with a black frame. The last fernandoi [Himatidium]. Bondar 1940b: 849-850. one ex AMC. Brasil: Bahia: Jequié and Nazareth, on flowers of Galathea (Marantaceae). Type in BC, «cotypes» fallaciosa [Urodera]. Monrós 1954: 246-249, f. 360- in BM and ERJ. 369. Córdoba, two parat. ex BRC; 2 parat. One parat. «Brasil / Eo Bahia / Mun. Jequié / Córdoba Prov.: Río Cuarto leg. Pellerano; one Bondar leg. / Coll. Martínez 5-IV-1940» handwr.; parat. Córdoba Prov.: San Javier: La Paz 29.I.1929 «Cotype» print. on dark red paper with a black ex BRC; two parat. San Luis; one parat. Santa frame; «Himatidium / fernandoi / Bondar», handwr. Fe, ex BRC; one parat. Corrientes Prov.: Santo on white paper with a black frame; «Imatidium / Tomé leg. Pellerano X.1925, all in MACN. Holot. Fernandoi / Det. Bondar» handwr., remainings of a m, allot. f Córdoba, leg. Molinari, in MC. Other black frame. parat. in MLP, FIML, MC, MVC, APC. Notes: Imatidium is the correct spelling. A syno- Two parat., one pinned, one glued to a card nym of Cephaloleia opaca Baly, 1858. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Córdoba / 190_ / C. Bruch» print.; «Col. / C. Bruch» print. two parat., pinned figueroae [Myochrous]. Brèthes 1925: 16. [Buenos «Río 4º / Córdob.» handwr. one parat. on a card Aires Prov.]: La Plata 12.IV.1923 leg. R. Figueroa, «La Paz (Dep. San Javier / Córdoba 1-20-I-1929 / C. one spec. Bruch» print.; two parat., pinned «Prov. de / San Holot. «La Plata / 12.IV.923 / R. Figueroa Luis» handwr. on green paper, reverse white; López» handwr.; «Repreparo / M. Viana / I-1960» «10926» handwr., red frame. two parat., pinned handwr.; «Myochrous / platensis Brèthes» handwr. «S. Tomé / Corrientes / 10-925» print., date handwr., by Brèthes; one of us (AOB) added «Myochrous / ex GPC. one parat., pinned «Chaco» handwr. on figueroae / Brèthes» handwr. on red cardboard, and green paper, reverse white; «6882» handwr., red «Holotypus» print. on red cardboard with a black frame. All: «Paratipo» handwr. on white paper with frame. Ex JBR. a red frame; «Urodera / fallaciosa / mihi [handwr.] / F. Monrós det. 1953 [print.]» on pink paper. Sev- flavifrons [Monachus]. Burmeister 1877: 64. eral of these ex BRC. Southern Patagonia, Santa Cruz Stream. Bachmann & Cabrera: Types of Chrysomelidae 65

One synt. «S. Cruz / Patag.» print. on green Holot. «f», «S. Tomé / Corrientes / 10-925» paper. On the bottom of the drawer a label reads print., date handwr., black frame; «53394» handwr., «flavifrons / Nobis» handwr. by Burmeister. One of red frame; «Holotypus» print. on red cardboard, us (AOB) added «Monachus / flavifrons / Burmeister black frame; «Chlamisus / guarani / mihi [handwr.] 1877 / Typus» handwr. on red cardboard. Ex HB. / F. Monrós det. 1950 [print.]» on pink cardboard. Notes: Blackwelder (1946: 643) records this spe- Ex GPC. cies under Lexiphanes Gistl 1850 nom. nov. pro Monachus Déjean 1835, non Fleming 1822 nec hepperi [Epitrix]. Bryant 1951: 940, f. 3. [Córdoba Kaup 1829. Leng (1918: 208) proposed Monachulus Prov.:] Río Cuarto III.1948 leg. Hepper on potato as a replacement name. plants; Buenos Aires Prov.: San Miguel leg. Hepper; Balcarce II.1948 leg. Hepper; SE of Buenos Aires florianoi [Himatidium]. Bondar 1942: 38-39. Prov. XII.1945, 22 spec., leg. Hepper. Brasil: Bahia: Bonfim, and Feira de Santa Ana, 115 Two synt?, parat. ? glued to cards, on one pin, cotypes in BC, MZSP, FMNH. three circular «Paratype» labels with yellow bor- One synt. «Brasil / Eo Bahia / Mun. Bonfin / F. der; «Rio 4º / s/papa 1940» handwr.; «Com. Inst. Mendonça leg. / Coll. Martínez» handwr.; «Cotypus» Ent. / Coll. N°. 12021» print., number handwr.; print. on dark red paper, black frame; «Himatidium «53426» handwr., red frame; «Epitrix / hepperi / / florianoi / Bondar» hadwr. on white paper, black Bryant [handwr.] / G.E. Bryant det. [print.]» on frame; «Imatidium / Florianoi / Det. Bondar» white paper. handwr. on white paper with remainings of a black frame. immersa [Cassida]. Spaeth 1909: 389-390. [Santa Notes: Imatidium is the correct spelling. Fe Prov.?]: Rosario; Brasil; Buenos Aires, coll. Borowiec (1999: 184) refers this species to the Clavareau; Buenos Aires ex BRC (MLP); [Uru- genus Demotispa. guay]: Montevideo ex MCSN. One synt. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Buenos Aires gemignanii [Stenispa]. Monrós & Viana 1947: 167- / 4.XII.1895 / C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; 168, pl. ii: 7. Misiones Prov.: Concepción: Santa «Typus» print. on pale green paper; «Cassida / María, holot. m, allot. f in MACN, 80 parat. in immersa / Spth.» handwr. by Bruch, red frame; MC, MVC. «Cassida / immersa typ! [handwr.] / Spaeth det. Holot. m, allot. f 1 parat. «Misiones Argen- [print.]» cut. Ex BRC. tina / Dep. Concep. Sta. Maria / M.J. Viana» print.; «51113» handwr., red frame; «Holotypus [Allotypus, inaurata [Mesomphalia]. Burmeister 1870: 275- Paratypus]» print. on red [red, yellow] cardboard; 276. Tucumán, «Männchen» [male]. «Stenispa / gemignanii / Monrós-Viana / Holotipo Two synt. «Tucuman» print. on green paper. m [Alotipo f, Paratipo]» handwr. on red [red, yel- On the bottom of the drawer a label reads «inaurata low] cardboard, the parat. in addition «Dibujado» Nob. / Rep. Arg. Br.» handwr. by Burmeister; «Col. [drawn] handwr. 5 parat. similar labels but «X- Antigua» print.. Ex HB. 1946» and «51192» handwr. Notes: Recorded as Pseudomesomphalia Note: Staines & Staines (1997: 9) mention inaurata by Spaeth (1914: 38). Barber & Bridwell that sixteen paratypes of this species are (1940: 9) considered Pseudomesomphalia as a syno- located in USNM. nym of Stolas. There are two further spec. labelled «4174» [handwr.] and «Tucuman» [print. on green graminis [Coptocycla]. Burmeister 1870: 281. paper]. In the old general register of the Museum, Tucumán Prov. and «agro Bonaerensi». the entry 4174 corresponds to a large ensemble of Two synt., pinned «Tucuman» and «Buen. / insects collected in Tucumán by Dinelli, entered in Ayres» respectiv., print. on green paper, the last one 1898. «653» print. One of us (AOB) added «Coptocycla / graminis / Burmeister 1870 / Syntypus» handwr. infirmior [Probaenia]. Weise 1906: 225. Buenos on red cardboard. Ex HB. Aires Prov. XI.1903. Notes: A synonym of Metriona (Metriona) tenella One synt. «Typus» print. on pale green paper; (Klug 1829), sub Cassida, after Spaeth (1914: 137). «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Buenos Aires / 11.1903 / C. The spec. is labelled «Plagiometriona» handwr. with Bruch» print., date handwr.; «Tigre» handwr. by pencil by Viana. Bruch; «51017» handwr., red frame; «Probaenia / infirmior Weise - tipo» handwr. by Bruch, red frame; guarani [Chlamisus]. Monrós 1952b: 627-628, f. «Probaenia / infirmior m.» handwr., cut; «Probaenia 151. Corrientes Prov.: Santo Tomé leg. Pellerano / crenata / ab. nigripes / (Chap.) / Det. M. Viana X.1925, holot. in MACN. [handwr.] / Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales 66 Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, n. s. 12 (1), 2010

[print.] [obverse] / X-1947 [handwr.] [reverse]» on «Typus» printed on pale green paper; «Megalopus white paper with a black frame. Ex BRC. / Jacobyi / m. tipo [handwr. by Bruch] / C. Bruch Notes: There is another spec. labelled «Cotypus» determ. [print.]». The other two «Rep. Argentina / print. on pale green paper; «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Prov. Tucumán / 5.II.1908 [on one, the other Buenos Aires / 5.III.1905 / C. Bruch» print., date III.1908] / C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; one of handwr.; «51018» handwr., red frame, not men- them «Typus» print.. on pale green paper; one of tioned in the original description. It is not clear if us (AOB) added «Megalopus / Jacobyi / Bruch 1908 it was intended to conform the type series (see at / Syntypus» [«Syntypus?»] handwr. on red card- the third list below). Monrós & Viana (1947: 272- board, black frame. All ex BRC. 273, pl. xxii: 90) synonymized P. infirmior with P. Notes: The type condition of the last spec. is crenata ab. nigripes (Chapuis 1877), an unavailable dubious, as it lacks an original «Typus» label. name, as it was proposed for an aberratio. Monrós (1947c: 208, 212-213, pl. 5: 4, f. 51e) re- corded it under Megalopus (Mucromegalopus). informis [Chelymorpha reimoseri subsp.]. Spaeth 1928: 3, footnote. Jujuy Prov.: Volcán, ex BRC; juncta [Cephalodonta]. Weise 1906: 222. Brasil Catamarca Prov., ex BRC. VII.1901. Two synt., pinned, «Typus» print. on pale green One synt. «Rep. Brasil / VII.1901 / C. Bruch» paper; «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Catamarca / 3.IV.1907 print., date handwr.; «Col. / C. Bruch» printed; [5.IV.1907] / C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; «Typus» «50932» handwr., red frame; «Typus» print. on red print. on pale green paper. One of them, in addi- paper; «Cephalodonta / juncta / Weise - tipo» handwr. tion «f», «Spaeth det.» print.; «Chelymorpha / by Bruch, red frame; «Cephalodonta / juncta m.» informis Spth - tipo» handwr. by Bruch, red frame; handwr., cut; «Sceloenopla / (Sceloenopla) / pretiosa «Chelymorpha [print.] / informis m. m type! / Baly / Det. M. Viana [handwr. by Viana] / Museo [handwr.]» on white paper. One of us (AOB) added Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [print.] [obverse] / to both «Chelymorpha / reimoseri / informis / Spaeth X-1947 [handwr.] [reverse]» on white cardboard with 1928 / Syntypus» handwr. on red cardboard with a a black frame. Ex BRC. black frame. Ex BRC. Notes: Considered a synonym of Sceloenopla Note: Hincks (1950: 509) considers Chelymorpha pretiosa (Baly 1858) by Uhmann (1937b: 206, 208- as a synonym of Cyphomorpha Chevrolat. 209, who examined a type in ZMB); recorded as Sceloenopla (Sceloenopla) pretiosa Baly by inopinatus [Chlamisus]. Monrós 1952b: 629-620, Monrós & Viana (1947: 186-187, pl. 23) who ex- f. 152. Corrientes Prov.: Santo Tomé, leg. Pellerano amined a spec. of juncta labelled «Typus» in XI.1927, holot., 5 parat. in MACN. MACN. Holot., 4 parat. «S. Tomé / Corrientes / 11-927» print., date handwr., black frame; the parat. in ad- lacordairei [Temnodachrys]. Monrós 1954: 200, dition «G. Pellerano» handwr.; «53392' handwr., red f. 30b. Jujuy, 1 parat. in MACN. Holot. from frame; «Holotypus [Paratypus]» printed on red [yel- Jujuy Prov.: Ledesma in FIML; other parat. in low] cardboard with a black frame; the holot. in MC, APC. addition «Chlamisus / inopinatus / mihi [handwr.] / One parat. «Jujuy» handwr. on dark green pa- F. Monrós det. 1950 [print.]» on pink cardboard. per, reverse white; «Paratipo» handwr. on white Ex GPC. paper with a red frame; «7274» handwr., red frame; «Dachrys / lacordairei / mihi [handwr.] / F. Monrós inornatus [Megalopus vespa var.]. Monrós 1947c: det. 1951 [print.]» on pink paper. 211, pl. iii: 5. Tucumán, holot. in BRC. Holot., pinned «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Tucumán laetificus [Chalepus]. Weise 1906: 224. Formosa / 27.11.1908 / C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; II.1895. «Holotipo de la var.» handwr., red frame; «Megalopus One synt. «Typus» print. on pale green paper; / vespa / mihi / v. inornatus / mihi / F. Monrós det. «Rep. Argentina / Gob. Formosa / 2.1895 / C. Bruch» 946» handwr. on yellow cardboard. Ex BRC. print., date handwr.; «Col. / C. Bruch» print.; Note: The name was described as a variety be- «50970» handwr., red frame; «Chalepus / laetificus fore 1960, and is therefore available. / Weise - tip.» handwr. by Bruch, red frame; «Chalepus laetificus W.» handwr., cut; jacobyi [sub Jacobyi] [Megalopus]. Bruch 1908: «Xenochalepus / (Xenoch.) / faustus / laetificus / 716-717, 1 f. Salta, 1 spec.; Tucumán Prov.: Tafí Weise / Det. M. Viana [handwr. by Viana] / Museo III.1908; Richter obtained several spec. Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [print.] [obverse] Two (three?) synt., pinned. One of them «Rep. / X-1947 [handwr.] [reverse]» on white cardboard, Argentina / Prov. Salta / 190_ / C. Bruch» print.; black frame. Ex BRC. Bachmann & Cabrera: Types of Chrysomelidae 67

Note: Recorded as Xenochalepus (s. str.) faustus The other «Argentina / La Rioja» printed; «Col. / A. Weise ab. laetificus by Monrós & Viana (1947: 238- Breyer» print.; «53374» handwr., red frame. Both 239, pl. xv: 59) who examined this syntype. «Paratypus» print. on yellow cardboard with a black frame; «Chlamisus / hispidulus / llajtamaucae / mihi lanuginosa [Urodera]. Monrós 1954: 239-240, f. [handwr.] / F. Monrós det. 1949 [print.]» on pink 35b. Santiago del Estero Prov.: Salado River 1 paper. parat.; Santa Fe Prov.: Fives Lille, leg. Weiser, 1 parat., both in MACN ex BRC. Holot., parat. maculata [Uhmannispa]. Monrós & Viana 1947: Santiago del Estero: Salado River in MC; 1 parat. 172-174, pl. vi: 24. Chaco Prov.: Fontana 5.III.1935 in APC. leg. Meyer, holot. in MACN. Chaco Prov., 1 parat. Two parat., one of them «Sgo. del Estero / Río in MLP; Chaco Prov.: Puerto Tirol, leg. Daguerre Salado / Wagner col.» print., black frame; the other 1 parat. «Fives Lille / S.F. Weiser» print. Both: «Paratipo» Holot. «Dibujado» [drawn], handwr.; «Argen- handwr., red frame, «Col. / C. Bruch» print., and tina / Chaco» print.; «46859» handwr., red frame; «Urodera / lanuginosa / mihi [handwr.] / F. Monrós «Holotypus» print. on red cardboard; «Uhmannispa det. 1952 [print.]» on pink paper. Ex BRC. / maculata / Monrós - Viana / Holotipo [handwr.] / Note: Moldenke (1981: 111) erected the new Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [print.] genus Paraurodera and mentioned that it is [obverse] / X-1947 [handwr.] [reverse]» on white doubtful to place Urodera lanuginosa in it.] cardboard, black frame. Notes: A synonym of Cephaloleia maxima liliacea [Lema]. Burmeister 1877: 54-55. Paraguay. Uhmann, 1942. A parat. deposited in the Daguerre Two synt., pinned, one of them «Paraguay» collection is now in the USNM (Staines & Staines print. on dark green paper, the other without la- (1997: 13). bels. One of us (AOB) added to both «Lema / liliacea / Burmeister / Syntypus» handwr. on red cardboard. martinezi [Miocalaspis]. Viana 1968: 8, 54, 60-63, Ex HB. 101, pl. iii: 16, pl. vi: 42. Bolivia: Cochabamba: Note: Recorded by Monrós (1951: 476) as Lema Chapare: Locotal 1200 m a.s.l. leg. A. Martínez (Lema) liliacea Burmeister = L. quinquevittata Pic II.1952, holot. m, allot. f in MACN. 1 f parat. 1941. id. in AMC. Holot. m, allot. f «Bolivia / Do Cochabamba / limbata [Cephalolia]. Pic 1928c: 4. Pcia. Chapare / Locotal. 1200 m / Coll. Martínez / One synt. «Delta / Paraná Guazú / 29.11.929. Feb. 952» handwr.; «Holotypus», [«Allotypus»] Bosq» handwr. by Bruch; «Col. / C. Bruch» print.; print. on red cardboard, black frame; «Miocalaspis «50910» handwr., red frame; «Typus» print. on red / martinezi / Viana / Holotipo m [Alotipo f] [ob- paper; «Cephalolia [sic] / limpata [sic] / Pic» handwr. verse] / M. Viana X-1968 [handwr., reverse]» by Bruch on white paper; «Cephalolia / limbata n. handwr. on red cardboard. 1 parat. «La [?] 558(50) sp.» handwr., cut; «Himantidium / limbatum / (Pic) Agenysa sp.? El Palmar / 1600 m / Bolivia / Prov. / Det. M. Viana [handwr. by Viana] / Museo Chapare / Dept. Cochabamba. 1952» handwr. with Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [print.]» on white pencil, folded; «Paratypus» print. on yellow card- cardboard with a black frame. Ex BRC. board, black frame; «Miocalaspis / martinezi / Viana Notes: Recorded as Himantidium limbatum by / Paratipo f [obverse] / M. Viana X-1968 [reverse]» Monrós & Viana (1947: 160-161, pl. v: 21) who ex- handwr. on yellow cardboard, black frame; the last amined the type series, and as Cephaloleia limbata one ex AMC. by Descarpentries & Villiers (1959: 139) who re- port one parat. in PC. The type locality corresponds martinezi [Omocera]. Viana 1964: 63-66, f. 1- to the Paraná River Delta, in Buenos Aires Prov. 4. Brasil: Minas Gerais: Serra do Cipó, Vao da Cephaloleia is the correct spelling. Lagoa, leg. Martínez XII.1962, holot., allot. 2 parat. in MACN, 1 parat. in MVC, 5 parat. in llajtamaucanus [Chlamisus hispidulus subsp.]. AMC. Monrós 1951: 454, 455-456. Mendoza, 1 parat. ex Holot., allot., 8 parat. «Brasil . Eo Minas BRC; La Rioja, 1 parat. ex ABC; Córdoba, 1 Geraes / Serra do Cipo / Vao da Lagoa / Coll. parat., all in MACN. Holot. Santiago del Estero Martínez / Dic. 1962» handwr.; «Holotypus Prov.: Llajtamauca I.1944 in MC, parat. in MC, [Allotypus, Paratypus]» print. on red [red, yellow] JBC, USNM, MLP, MP. cardboard, black frame; «Omocera / martinezi / Two parat., one of them «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Viana / Holotipo m [Alotipo f, Paratipo] [obverse] Mendoza / 190_ / C. Bruch» print.; «Col. / C. Bruch» / VI-1964 [reverse]» handwr. on red [red, yellow] print., with red ink; «53375» handwr., red frame. cardboard; 5 of the parat. ex AMC. 68 Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, n. s. 12 (1), 2010 mauliki [Himatidium]. Bondar 1941: 273-274. missionensis [Anisostena s. str.]. Monrós & Viana Brasil: Bahia: Cachoeira 5.V.1940; typus in BC, 1947: 203, pl. xii: 45. Misiones Prov.: Dep. cotypes in BM. Concepción: Santa María, leg. Viana, 23 cotypes One parat. «Brasil / Eo Bahia / Mun. Cachoeira in MACN, MC, MVC. / Bondar leg. / Coll. Martínez / 5-V.1940» handwr.; Two synt. «Misiones - Argentina / Dep. Concep. «Cotype» print. on dark red paper, black frame; Sta. María / M.J. Viana» print.; «51120» handwr., «Himatidium / mauliki / Bon» handwr. on white red frame; «Cotypus» print. on red cardboard with paper, black frame; «Imatidium / Mauliki / Det. a black frame; «Anisostena / (Anisostena) / Bondar» handwr., remainings of a black frame. Ex missionensis / Monrós - Viana - cotipo [handwr.] / AMC. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [print.]» Notes: The correct spelling is Imatidium. A on red cardboard, black frame. One of them synonym of Cephaloleia bondari Monrós, 1945 «Dibujado» [drawn] handwr. (nom. novum). Notes: Staines (1993: 187-188) refers this spe- cies to his new subgenus Anisostena (Apostena). melochiae [Chlamisus]. Monrós 1952b: 529-530, Two syntypes are deposited in the USNM. 541, 551, 600-602, f. 64, 89, 116, 139. Entre Ríos Prov.: Concordia, leg. Daguerre, 2 parat. in MACN. negligens [Amplipalpa]. Weise 1905: 52. In a key; Holot., parat. in FIML; other parat. FIML, MC, Buenos Aires. MVC, JBC, SCT. One synt., one parat. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Two parat. «Entre Ríos / Concordia / Daguerre» Buenos Aires / 24.V.1903 [21.V.1903] / C. Bruch» print.; «Entre Ríos / Concordia / J.B. Daguerre» print., date handwr.; «Col. / C. Bruch» print.; «50901 handwr.; «26323» handwr., red frame; «Paratypus» [50902]» handwr., red frame; «Typus» [«Cotypus»] print. on yellow cardboard with a black frame; print. on pale green paper; one of them «Amplipalpa «Chlamisus / sphaeralceae / mihi [handwr.] / F. / negligens / Weise - tipo» handwr. by Bruch, red Monrós det. 1948 [print.]» on pink paper. frame; both «Oediopalpa / negligens / (Weise) / Det. Note: Under the heading «Chlamisus M. Viana [handwr.] / Museo Argentino de Ciencias melochiae» there are in the drawer two specimens Naturales [print.] [obverse] / X-1947 [handwr., re- from Concordia, Entre Ríos Province, Argentina. verse]» on white cardboard, black frame. Both are rotulated «Paratypus», and one of them Note: Recorded as Oediopalpa negligens by is rotulated also «Chlamisus sphaeralceae». At the Blackwelder (1946: 717). Instituto Lillo, Tucumán, where the other types are housed, the specimens are also rotulated neivai [Himatidium]. Bondar 1940a: 205-209, f. «sphaeralceae», not «melochiae». In the rather ex- 1-3. Brasil: Bahia: Agua Preta, holot. in BC, 19 tensive paper of Monrós, Chlamisus melochiae is the parat. in IIE, ERJ. only species collected on Sphaeralcea sp. (Malvaceae) One parat. «Brasil / Eo Bahia / Agua Preta / P. and on Melochia sp. (Sterculiaceae), no other spe- Silva leg. / Coll. Martínez» handwr.; «Cotype» cies come from any of these plants. Probably Monrós print. on dark red paper with a black frame; wished to name the species after a nourishing plant, «Himatidium / neivai / Bondar» handwr. on white selecting at first instance sphaeralceae, and shifted paper, black frame; «Imatidium / Neivai / Det. later to melochiae, but he failed to replace the labels Bondar» handwr. on white paper, remainings of a from the specimens. Therefore I decided to hold the black frame. specimens as authentic, and we add to them an ad- Notes: The correct spelling is Imatidium. ditional label reading «Chlamisus melochiae Monrós Borowiec (1999: 185) refers this species to the 1952. Acta zoologica lilloana 10: 600-602» print. on genus Demotispa. white paper. nigropicta [Epitrix]. Bryant 1951: 938-939, f. 1. meridionalis [Saxinis]. Monrós 1954: 258-260, f. [Buenos Aires Prov.]: Balcarce leg. Hepper II.1948, 377-380. 2 parat. Jujuy, ex BRC; 2 parat. without 3 spec. on potato plants. locality data, all of these in MACN. Holot. m, al- One synt.? parat.?, «Paratype» printed on a lot. f., several parat. Córdoba Prov.: Pampa de yellow-margined disk; «ex planta de papa», Olaen I.1946 in MC, other parat. in BM, USNM, «Balcarce II-1948 / H.C. Hepper», both handwr. by MLP, DEI, MC, MVC. Hepper; «Com. Inst. Ent. Coll. no. 12021» printed, Two parat. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Jujuy / 190_ number handwr.; «53427» handwr., red frame; / C. Bruch» print; «Col. / C. Bruch» print.; «Paratipo» «Epitrix / nigropicta / Bryant [handwr.] / G.E. handwr. on white paper, red frame; «Saxinis / Bryant det. [print.]» on white paper. meridionalis / mihi [handwr. by Monrós] / F. Monrós Note: The spec. are rotulated as paratypes, but det. 1951 [1952] [print.]» on pink paper. they could be syntypes. Bachmann & Cabrera: Types of Chrysomelidae 69 nigrovittis [Metallactus]. Jacoby 1908: 855. Argen- pallipes [Temnodachrys complexa ssp.]. Monrós tina: Chaco [perhaps a single spec., as only one 1954: 207-208. Corrientes Prov.: Santo Tomé X.1927 measurement is given]. leg. G. Pellerano 1 parat. ex GPC in MACN. Holot. Holot.? synt.? , not even a type? «Rep. Argen- and several parat. Misiones Prov.: Posadas tina / Gob. Chaco / 190_ / C. Bruch» printed; VII.1945 in MC; other parat. FIML, MLP, MC, «Cotypus» printed on pale green paper; MVC, APC. «Metallactus / nigrovittis / Jac.» handwr. by Bruch, One parat. «S. Tomé / Corrientes / 10-927» red frame. Ex BRC. print., date handwr., black frame; «Paratipo» Note: The type condition is dubious, as the only handwr., red frame; «D. complexa / ssp. pallipes / identification label is handwr. by Bruch, not by mihi [handwr.] / F. Monrós det. 1951 [print.]» on Jacoby. pink paper. Ex GPC. notaticeps [Brachycoryna]. Pic 1928c: 4. parallela [Stenispa]. Pic 1930: 45. Buenos Aires Two synt. One of them «Typus» handwr. by Prov.: Rosas, leg. Daguerre, in BRC and PC. Types Bruch on pale green paper; «Hualfin / Catam. not formally designated. 17.1.23» handwr. by Bruch; «Col. / C. Bruch» print.; Three synt. on cards, on 2 pins «Rosas - F.C.Sud «50996» handwr., red frame; «Brachycoryna / / Provincia de Buenos Aires / Juan B. Daguerre» notaticeps / Pic / Det. M. Viana [handwr. by Viana] print.; «Col. / C. Bruch» print.; «50914» on the pin / Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [print.] with 1, «50915» on the pin with 2, handwr., red [obverse] / X-1947 [handwr.] [reverse]» on white frame; «Typus» print. on red paper on the pin with cardboard, black frame. The other one «Typus» 1; handwr. by Bruch on pale green paper on the pin handwr. by Bruch on pale green paper; «La Cienaga with 2; «Stenispa / parallela / Pic» handwr. by Bruch; / Catam. Wolters» handwr. by Bruch; «Col. / C. «Stenispa / parallela n.sp.» handwr., cut; «Stenispa Bruch» print.; «50997» handwr., red frame. Both / parallela / Pic / Det. M. Viana [handwr.] / Museo «Brachycoryna / notaticeps / Pic» handwr. by Bruch. Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [print.] [obverse] Ex BRC. / X-1947 [handwr.] [reverse]» on white cardboard, black frame. One of us (AOB) added «Syntypus» octoguttatus [sub octo-guttatus] [Griburius]. and «Syntypi» respectiv., handwr. on red cardboard. Burmeister 1877: 65-66. [Entre Ríos Prov.]: Paraná. Ex BRC. Two synt., pinned, one of them «Parana / Jan.» Notes:. Descarpentries & Villiers (1959) state print. on green paper, the other without labels. One that the holotype is housed in the Muséum Na- of us (AOB) added to both «Griburius / octoguttatus tional d’Histoire Naturelle in Paris. Three speci- / Burmeister 1877 / Syntypus» handwr. on red card- mens labelled as paratypes are deposited in the board. A label fastened to the bottom of the drawer USNM. Staines & Staines (1997:17) consider all reads «octo - guttatus» handwr. by Burmeister. Ex the specimens, those in Paris and those in Bue- HB. nos Aires, as syntypes. oyaguava [Temnodachrys (Eudachrys)]. Monrós persimilis [Griburius]. Burmeister 1877: 66. Bue- 1954: 191-192, f. 297. Córdoba, 1 parat. in BRC. nos Aires. Holot., allot. 1 parat. Misiones Prov.: Pindapoy, One synt., pinned «Buen. / Ayres» print. on dark leg. Bosq, in MC. green paper. One of us (AOB) added «Griburius / One parat. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Córdoba / persimilis / Burmeister 1877 / Typus» handwr. on 190_ / C. Bruch» print.; «Col. / C. Bruch» print.; red cardboard. Ex HB. «Paratipo» handwr. on white paper, red frame; «Dachrys / oyaguava / mihi [handwr.] / F. Monrós planicollis [Lema]. Burmeister 1877: 56. Para- det. 1951 [print.]» on pink paper. Ex BRC. guay, with var. a to d. Six synt., pinned on 5 pins, 1st and 4th pins with- pallipes [Decatelia]. Weise 1922: 31. Paraguay: out labels, 2d, 3d (with 2 spec.) and 5th pins «Paraguay» Santa Trinidad X.1913 leg. Zürcher. print. on dark green paper. One of us (AOB) added to Holot., on a card, «Typus» print. on pale green all pins «Lema / planicollis / Burmeister 1877 / Syntypi paper; «Paraguay / Sa. Trinidad / IX.1913» print., [Syntypus]» handwr. on red cardboard. Ex HB. date handwr.; «Col. / C. Bruch» print.; «51001» Note: Synonymized with Lema orbignyi (Guérin handwr., red frame; «Decatelia / pallipes / Weise» 1844) by Monrós (1947a: 169) along with L. dorsa- handwr. by Bruch, red frame; «Decatelia / pallipes lis Frers 1922. m.» handwr., cut. Ex BRC. Note: Recorded as Paradecatelia pallipes by polichroma [Lema]. Monrós 1952a: 33-42, f. 1, 3- Uhmann (1951: 334). 25. Salta, 2 spec. ex HB; Tucumán, 3 spec. ex BRC; 70 Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, n. s. 12 (1), 2010

Tucumán Prov.: Tafí 1 spec. ex BRC; Santiago del Note: Monrós (1959: 31) recorded it as a syno- Estero, 7 spec. ex BRC. Other spec. MLP, FIML, nym of Ernoporus splendida (Philippi), transferred MC, JBC. Types not formally designated. from Oyarzuna. Twelve synt., 3 of them «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Tucuman / 3.1.1908 [9.11.1908] / C. Bruch» print., proxima [Lema]. Burmeister 1877: 54. Paraguay dates handwr. 1 of them «Valle Tafí / Tucumán» Four synt., pinned on 3 pins, 1st (with 2) and 3d handwr. by Bruch. 7 of them «Rep. Argentina / Pr. pins «Paraguay» print. on green paper, 2d pin with- Santiago d. Estero / 190_ / C. Bruch» print., the first out labels. One of us (AOB) added to all «Lema / one of this series of 7, in addition, «Lema / proxima / Burmeister 1877 / Syntypi [Syntypus]» (Quasilema) / polichroma / Monrós [handwr.] / F. handwr. on red cardboard. Ex HB. Monrós det. 1952 [print.]», all of these ex BRC. 1 Notes: Monrós (1947a: 169) put paraguayensis of them pinned, «Salta» handwr. on green paper, ex de Borre, and paraguensis: Clavareau in Schenkling HB. One of us (AOB) added to all «Lema / as synonyms of proxima. Monrós (1951: 476) in- polichroma / Monrós 1952 / Syntypus» handwr. on cluded the species in Lema (Quasilema), and put red cardboard. L. maculipes Pic as a synonym. Note: Recorded by Monrós (1957: 186) as a syno- nym of Lema (Quasilema) latipennis Pic 1941 = L. proxima [Stenispa]. Monrós & Viana 1947: 169-170, latebifasciata Pic 1951. pl. ii: 9. Corrientes Prov.: Nueva Valencia in MACN; Entre Ríos Prov.: Paraná Bravo River in GKC. 14 polyspilota [Chelymorpha]. Burmeister 1870: 278. cotypes in MACN, MC, AMC, MVC, GKC. [Uruguay]: Montevideo, leg. Arachavaleta. Two synt., one of them «Corrientes / Nueva Va- One synt., originally pinned, and later glued to lencia / M. Viana 1947» handwr.; «51112» handwr., a card by Viana, «Banda / orient.» print. on dark red frame; the other one «Dibujado» [drawn] green paper; «Col. / Antigua» print.; «polyspilota handwr.; «R. Bravo (Delta) / E. Ríos 6/2/43» handwr., Nob. / Rep. orient.» handwr. by Burmeister. One of black frame; «51111» handwr., red frame. Both us (AOB) added «Chelymorpha / polyspilota / «Cotypus» print. on red cardboard; «Stenispa / Burmeister / Typus» handwr. on red cardboard. Ex proxima / Monrós - Viana / Cotipo [handwr.] / Museo HB. Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [print.]» on red Notes: The spec. was filed by Viana in the drawer cardboard. under Anacassis cribrum (Klug 1829) in the collec- Notes: Gaedicke & Döbler (1971: 358) report two tion of MACN. Hincks (1950: 509) considered that synt. from Entre Ríos Prov. in DEI. Under «R. Chelymorpha Chevrolat 1838 is a synonym of Bravo» the Paraná Bravo Stream is meant. Staines Cyphomorpha Hope [1840]. With «Banda Oriental» & Staines (1997:18) mention that seven speci- Uruguay is meant. mens from Monrós collection are in the USNM. porcata [Lema]. Burmeister 1877: 56-57. Para- quadriplagiata [Epitrix]. Bryant 1951: 939-940, guay, 1 spec. f. 2. [Buenos Aires Prov.]: Balcarce II.1948, 9 spec. Two synt., pinned, one of them «Paraguay» leg. Hepper; La Rioja Prov.: Patquía XII.1932, 2 printed on dark green paper, the other without la- spec. on potato plants. bels. One of us (AOB) added «Lema / porcata / Two synt.?, parat.?, on cards, on 1 pin, Burmeister 1877» and «Syntypus» handwr. on red «Paratype» on 2 disks with yellow border; «ex hojas cardboard. Ex HB. de planta de papa» [from leaves of potato plants], Notes: The second spec. could not even be a type, «S. Miguel / BA. III.48 / H.C. Hepper», handwr. by as Burmeister mentions only one spec.. Monrós Hepper; «Com. Inst. Ent. / Coll. no. 12021» print., (1948: 212) suggests this could be a variety of L. number handwr.; «53428» handwr., red frame; orbignyi (Guérin 1844). «Epitrix / quadriplagiata / Bryant [handwr.] / G.E. Bryant det. [print.]» on white paper. porteri [Ernoporus]. Brèthes 1928: 213-214. Chile: Notes: San Miguel was not mentioned in the Quillota, leg. Porter. original description, but otherwise the labels seem Two synt. «Quillota / 5.VIII.1894 / C.E. Por- authentic. The spec. are rotulated as paratypes, but ter», «Ernoporus / Porteri / Brèthes», «type! they could be syntypes. [type!!]», handwr., the 1st one with a small square piece of red paper. One of us (AOB) added to both quinquenotata [Mecistomela (Coraliomela) «Syntypus» handwr. on red cardboard. A slide thoracica var.]. Berg 1900: 255. Paraguay, and [Ar- «Ernoporus Porteri Brèthes - type! - Chili - Porter gentina:] Misiones Prov.; in MACN. leg. Quillota», handwr. by Brèthes, sub E.10 in slide One synt., pinned, «Parag.» handwr. on green collection. paper, reverse white; «Col. / Antigua» print.; Bachmann & Cabrera: Types of Chrysomelidae 71

«51104» handwr., red frame; «Typus» print. on red rufitarsis [Cistudinella]. Spaeth 1905: 98-99. paper; «var. quinquemaculata / Berg» handwr. by Brasil, leg. Natterer, in NHMW; Brasil in MRB and Berg on yellowish paper; «Coraliomela / thoracica / SC. ab.: quinquemaculata / (Berg) / Det. M. Viana One synt.?, pinned «Rep. Brasil / 16.II.1901 / [handwr.] / Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; «Cotypus» print. on [print.] [obverse] / X-1947» [handwr.] [reverse]» on pale green paper; «Cistudinella / rufitarsis / Spth» white cardboard with a black frame. One of us handwr. by Bruch, red frame; «Cistudinella / (AOB) added «Syntypus» handwr. on red cardboard. rufitarsis m. [handwr.] / Spaeth det. [print.]», cut. Note: Recorded as Coraliomela quadrimaculata Ex BRC. var. quinquenotata by Fischer (1935: 286), and as Note: No reference to BRC was made in the Coraliomela thoracica ab. quinquenotata by Monrós original description, but otherwise the type condi- & Viana (1947: 181-182, pl. X: 32). tion seems authentic. rectecarinata [Aulacochlamys]. Monrós 1952b: saucius [Monachus]. Burmeister 1877: 63-64. 658-661, f. 172 a-c. Corrientes Prov.: Santo Tomé [Uruguay]: Montevideo and [Argentina]: Buenos leg. Pellerano, 3 parat. in MACN. Holot., Aires. Tucumán Prov.: San Javier 3.XII.1944 Golbach leg., Two synt., one of them «Buen. / Ayres» print. in FIML, other parat. in MC. on green paper, the other «saucius / Nob.» handwr. Three parat. «S. Tomé / Corrientes / 2-925 [on by Burmeister. One of us (AOB) added to both one, the other two without date]» print., black «Monachus / saucius / Burmeister 1877 / Syntypus» frame, date handwr.; one of them in addition «Santo handwr. on red cardboard. Ex HB. Tomé / Corrientes / G. Pellerano» handwr.; «53403» Note: Recorded by Blackwelder (1946: 644) un- handwr., red frame; «Paratypus» print. on yellow der Lexiphanes Gistl 1850 nom. nov. pro Monachus cardboard with a black frame; «Aulacochlamys / Déjean 1835 et Chevrolat 1837, non Fleming 1822 rectecarinata / mihi [handwr.] / F. Monrós det. 1950 nec Kaup 1829. [print.]» on pink [white] paper. seabrai [Goniochenia (Baranosa)]. Viana 1966: reducta [Uroplata]. Monrós & Viana 1947: 297- 115-119, f. 1, 2. Brasil: Benjamin Constant, holot. 298, pl. xxv: 106. Santa Fe Prov.: San Justo, leg. m, allot.f , parat.; Brasil: Acre, parat., in CSC. Daguerre, 1 cot. in MACN, 1 cot. in JDC. Other parat. in MF, DC. One synt. «Dibujado» [drawn] handwr.; «Santa Five parat., one of them «Brasil / Benj. Constant Fe / San Justo / 3.XI.942 / Daguerre» handwr. by / Rio Javary / alto Amazonas 10.1942 / Dirings.» Daguerre; «51155» handwr., red frame; «Uroplata print., date handwr.; «Coll. Dirings. / S. Paulo . Brasil / (Codiohispa) / reducta / Monrós-Viana / Cotipo / 748» print.. Two of them «Puerto Walter / Acre . [handwr.] / Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bras. 56» print.; «Museum Frey / Tützing» print.. [print.] [obverse] / X-1947 [handwr.] [reverse]» on Two of them «Benjamin Constant / Am. Brasil. white paper with a black frame. XI.1962. A. Silva col.» handwr. All «Paratypus» print. Note: Described from two syntypes, the other on yellow cardboard, black frame; «Goniochenia / specimen is from the Daguerre collection, now (Baranosa) / seabrai / Viana / Paratipo [obverse] / M. in the USNM (Ward et al., 1976; Staines & Viana / X-1966 [reverse]», handwr. Staines 1997: 18). semipurpureus [Metallactus]. Jacoby 1908: 851- ruficollis [Psatyrocerus]. Brèthes 1928: 206. Chile, 852. Brasil; one of the spec., received from C. Bruch, leg. Porter. MLP, without locality label. One synt. «Psatyrocerus / ruficollis Brèthes / One synt.?, parat.? «Cotypus» print. on pale Chili. Porter» handwr. on a big square card with green paper; «Metallactus / semipurpureus / Jac.» rounded corners; «Col. / J. Brèthes» print.. One of handwr. by Bruch, red frame. Ex BRC. us (AOB) added «Typus» printed on red cardboard. Note: Two spec. were mentioned, but it is not clear if the term «Cotypus» on the second one re- rufipes [Cephalolia]. Pic 1929: 182. Brasil, ex BRC. fers to a syntype or to a paratype. Holot. «Rep. Brasil / III.1901 / C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; «Col. / C. Bruch» printed; «50913» serjaniae [Exema]. Monrós 1952b: 650-653, f. 161, handwr., red frame; «Typus» print. on red paper; 168. Tucumán 1889, 1 parat. ex BRC. Holot. m «Cephalolia (sic) / rufipes / Pic» handwr. by Bruch, Salta: Orán: Agua Blanca 24.XI.1948 leg. Monrós, green frame; «Cephalolia (sic) / rufipes n. sp.» in FIML, parat. in FIML and MC. handwr., cut. Ex BRC. One parat. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Tucumán / Note: The correct spelling is Cephaloleia. XI.1899 / C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; «Col. / C. 72 Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, n. s. 12 (1), 2010

Bruch» print. with red ink; «53402» handwr., red Twenty-six parat., on 17 pins. Spec. 1st, 2d frame; «Paratypus» print. on yellow cardboard; «Tucumán / C. Bruch / I.1907» handwr., «Col. / C. «Exema / serjaniae / mihi [handwr.] / F. Monrós det. Bruch» print. with red ink, «53398» handwr., red 1950 [print.]» on pink paper. frame. Spec. 3d, 4th «Tuc. 11/1914 / [? not legible]» Note: Chûjô (1940) synonymized Exema with handwr. Spec. 5th «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Tucumán Chlamisus. / I.1907 / C. Bruch» print., date handwr., «Col. / C. Bruch» print., «53398» handwr., red frame. Spec. sidae [Chlamisus]. Monrós 1952b: 596-599, f. 88, 6th through 9th «Argentina / Chaco» handwr., 115, 138. Tucumán, 1 parat.; Tucumán Prov.: «32170» handwr., red frame. Spec. 10th «Rep. Ar- Famaillá 20.I.1921, 1 parat.; Corrientes, 1 parat., gentina / Gob. Chaco / 190_ / C. Bruch» print., all three ex BRC in MACN. Holot. Salta Prov.: «Charata / X-1924. Bosq» handwr. by Bruch, «Col. / Coronel Moldes II.1945, in MC; parat. in FIML, C. Bruch» print. with red ink, «53394» handwr., red MP, CMSM, MNH, EEAT, SCT, MLP, MC, MVC, frame. Spec. 11th through 14th, on 2 pins, «Rep. Ar- APC, JBC. gentina / Prov. Corrientes / 190_ / C. Bruch» print., Four parat., one of them «Rep. Argentina / Prov. «Col. / C. Bruch» print. with red ink, «53400» Tucumán / 1-1908 / C. Bruch» print., date handwr., handwr., red frame. Spec. 15th through 18th, on 3 «Col. / C. Bruch» print. with red ink, «53381» pins «S. Tomé / Corrientes» print., with different handwr., red frame. The 2d one «Famaillá / Tucumán handwr. dates, «53401» handwr., red frame. Spec. / 20.I.1921» handwr. by Bruch, «Col. / C. Bruch» print. 19th through 26th «Santo Tomé / Corrientes» print., with red ink; «53382» handwr., red frame. The 3d with different handwr. dates; «53401» handwr., red one «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Corrientes / 190_ / C. frame. All: «Paratypus» print. on yellow cardboard, Bruch» print., «Col. / C. Bruch» print. with red ink; «Chlamisus / sordidulus / mihi [handwr.] / F. Monrós «53383» handwr., red frame. The 4th one «Rep. Ar- det. 1949 [print.]» on pink [some, other white] pa- gentina / Prov. Tucumán / 11 [?] 1905 / C. Bruch» per. print., date handwr., «53384» handwr., red frame, «Jac. vid. 18n» handwr. All: «Paratypus» print. on spaethi [Himatidium]. Bondar 1941: 274-275. yellow cardboard, «Chlamisus / sidae / mihi [handwr.] Brasil: Bahia: Pituba 12.V.1940. Holot. in BC, 13 / F. Monrós det. 1948 [print.]» on pink paper. 1 parat. parat. ex AMC «Argentina / Salta / Orán / Martínez / En. 1 parat. «Brasil / Eo Bahia / Pituba / Bondar 945» handwr., «Paratipo» handwr. on white paper, leg. / 12-V-1940» handwr., «Cotypus» print. on dark red frame, «Ch. / sidae / Monrós [handwr.] / F. Monrós red paper, black frame, «Himatidium / spaethi / det. 1952 [print.]» on white paper, with remainings Bondar» handwr. on white paper with a black frame, of a black frame. «Imatidium / spaethi / Det. Bondar» handwr. on white paper, remainings of a black frame. smaragdina [Ischiopachys empyrea subsp.]. Note: Imatidium is the correct spelling. Monrós 1954: 266. Salta, 2 parat., [Salta Prov.:] Senillosa, km 1352, 2 parat., both ex BRC. Holot. sparsa [Bruchia]. Weise 1906: 227. Buenos Aires Jujuy city II.1945, in MC. 1 parat. in USNM. Prov.: La Plata 10.XI.1903. Two parat., pinned «Salta» handwr.; 1 parat., Holot., «Typus» print. on pale green paper, pinned «Salta km 1352 F.C.C.N.A» handwr. 1 «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Buenos Aires / 10.XI.1903 / parat., pinned «Salta - Senillosa - km 1352!» C. Bruch» print., date handwr., «Col. / C. Bruch» handwr. All: «Col. / C. Bruch» print., «Paratipo» print., «50995» hamdwr., red frame, «Bruchiella / handwr. on white paper, red frame, «I. empyrea / sparsa / Ws.» handwr. by Bruch, red frame, «Bruchi ssp. smaragdina / mihi [handwr.] / F. Monrós det. / sparsa» handwr., cut, «Bruchia / sparsa / Weise / 1950 [print.]» on pink paper. Det. M. Viana [handwr.] / Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [print.] [obverse] / X-1947 sordidulus [Chlamisus]. Monrós 1952b: 614-618, [handwr.] [reverse]» on white cardboard, black f. 94, 119, 146. Tucumán, leg. Girard III.1914, 2 frame. parat.; Chaco Prov.: Charata, leg. Bosq, 1 parat., Notes: Monrós & Viana (1947: 259-260, pl. xvii: ex BRC; Chaco Prov: Resistencia 4 parat.; 68) examined this type in MACN. Descarpentries Misiones Prov.: dept. Concepción: Santa María, leg. & Villiers (1959) did not mention the genus. Viana several parat.; Corrientes, 4 parat. ex BRC; Corrientes Prov.: Santo Tomé, 12 parat. ex GPC, striolatus [Chlamisus]. Bokermann 1964: 65-67, all in MACN. Holot. Tucumán, leg. Golbach f. 1-5. Holot. m and parat. m Mato Grosso: Cuiabá 3.XII.1944, in FIML. Other parat. in FIML, 7.XII.1962, in WBC; parat. in MG, CM, CSC. USNM, GM, MPA, MLP, MC, APC, MVC, AMC, One parat. «Coleção / Bokermann» print. on JBC, SCT. red paper, black frame, «Cuiabá / M. Grosso - Brasil Bachmann & Cabrera: Types of Chrysomelidae 73

/ 7.XII.1962 / Werner col.» handwr., black frame; «Dachrys / sympathica / mihi [handwr.] / F. Monrós «2211» typed, «Chlamisus / striolatus / paratipo m» det. 1951 [print.]» on pink paper. [handwr.] / Bokermann det. 1963 [print.]» on red Note: In the registration book of the Entomo- paper, black frame. Ex AMC. logical Division of MACN the entering 17235 re- fers to an assemble of insects collected by A. Pozzi subaenea [Paria]. Jacoby 1900: 510. La Plata, sev- and A. Zotta during a trip to Jujuy Prov., XI- eral spec. received from Mons. Clavareau, Brus- XII.1925. sels. Three synt. on cards, on one pin, «Rep. Argen- tandilensis [Chalepus]. Bruch 1933: 220-224, f. 3, tina / Prov. Buenos Aires / 190_ / C. Bruch» print.; pl. iii: 6. [Buenos Aires Prov.:] Tandil: Sierra de las «Cotypus» print. on pale green paper, «Paria / Animas XII.1930 (the ‘typical’ spec., 15.X.1932 a subaenea / Jac.» handwr. by Bruch, red frame; ‘later’ spec.), all leg. Koehler. «Paria /subaenea» handwr., cut. One synt. «Typus» and «Foto» handwr. by Note: Bechyné (1953: 121, 272) downgraded the Bruch on pale green paper, «Tandil / Sierra d.l. species to an aberratio of Periparia boggianii, stat- Animas / P. Köhler. XII-930» handwr. by Bruch, «Col. ing that they differ only by color, a quite variable / C. Bruch» print., «50971» handwr., red frame, «Ch. feature. (Xenochalepus) / tandilensis / Bruch [handwr. by Bruch] / C. Bruch determ. [print.]» on white paper, subaenescens [Cryptocephalus]. Jacoby 1908: 843. black frame, «Xenochalepus / (Xenochalepus) / Tucumán, in MLP and author’s coll. tandilensis / Bruch / Det. M. Viana [handwr.] / One synt. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Tucumán / Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [print.] 190_ / C. Bruch» print., «Cotypus» print. on pale [obverse] / X-1947 [handwr.] [reverse]» on white green paper, «Cryptocephalus / subaeneus / Jac.» cardboard, black frame. Ex BRC. handwr. by Bruch, red frame, ex BRC. Notes: No type was formally designated in the original description. A syntype from the sulcatifrons [Stenispa]. Pic 1928b: 101. Corrientes Daguerre collection is now in the USNM (Ward Prov.: San Roque II.1920, leg. Bosq, in BRC. et al 1976]. Gaedicke & Döbler (1971: 361) report Holot.? synt.?, «Dibujado» [drawn] handwr., a synt. in DEI. Staines & Riley (1994: 219) refer «Corrientes / San Roque / II-920 - Bosq» handwr. Chalepus tandilensis to the subgenus Xeno- by Bruch, «Col. / C. Bruch» print., «50916» handwr., chalepus. Monrós & Viana (1947: 240-241, pl. xvii: red frame, «Typus» print. on red cardboard, 63) upgraded the subgenus Xenochalepus to the «Stenispa / sulcatifrons / Pic» handwr. by Bruch, generic rank. green frame, «Stenispa / sulcatifrons n.sp.» handwr., cut, there are some other ilegible traits; «Stenispa tesselata [Poecilaspis]. Burmeister 1870: 276. / sulcatifrons / Pic / Det. M. Viana [handwr.] / Museo Tucumán. Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [print., obverse] / One synt. on a card, but originally pinned, X-1947 [handwr.] [reverse]». «Tucumán» print. on green paper, «Col. / Antigua» Notes: Pic did not mention how many spec. he print., «Typus» print. on red cardboard; «tesselata examined, but the only repository recorded is BRC, Nob.» handwr. by Burmeister on a label fastened where a single spec. is kept. Descarpentries & to the bottom of the drawer. Ex HB. Villers (1959) state that there is no type in PC. Note: Recorded under subgenus Poecilaspis by Moreover, this spec. was labelled «Typus», not Spaeth (1914: 47); and under genus Botanochara «Cotypus» by Bruch. So the holot. condition could by Blackwelder (1946: 742). be inferred. Monrós & Viana (1947: 166, 167, pl. ii: 10) examined the spec. trinotata [Mecistomela (Coraliomela) thoracica var.]. Berg 1900: 255. Paraguay, in MACN. sympathica [Temnodachrys]. Monrós 1954: 202- Holot., pinned, «Paraguay» print. on green 203, f. 308, 314. Córdoba: Alta Gracia: La Granja, 3 paper, «Col. / Antigua» print., «51113» handwr., red parat. ex BRC; 1 parat. without locality label, both frame, «Typus» print. on red paper, «trinotata Berg» in MACN. Holot. Córdoba: Calamuchita, leg. Viana handwr. by Berg on yellowish paper, «Coraliomela XII.1938, in MC. Other parat. in JBC, APC, and / thoracica / ab: trinotata (Berg) / Det. M. Viana MC. [handwr.] / Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Three parat. on cards, on 1 pin, «Alta Gracia, [print.] [obverse] / X-1947 [handwr.] [reverse]» on La Granja / Sierras de Córdoba / XII-921. C. Bruch white cardboard. leg.» print., date handwr., «Col. / C. Bruch» print.. Note: Recorded as Coraliomela thoracica ab. 1 parat., pinned «17235» handwr., red frame. Both: trinotata by Monrós & Viana (1947: 180-181, pl. x: «Paratipo» handwr. on white paper, red frame, and 31) who examined this spec. 74 Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, n. s. 12 (1), 2010 tucumana [Cephalolia]. Weise 1904: 439. «53388» handwr., red frame. All: «Paratypus» print. Tucumán IX.1897, C. Bruch. on yellow cardboard, and «Chlamisus / tucumanus 2 synt. on cards, on 1 pin, «Rep. Argentina / / mihi [handwr.] / F. Monrós det. 1949 [print.]» on Prov. Tucumán / X.1897 / C. Bruch» print. date pink paper. 1 parat. ex AMC «R.A. Tucuman / handwr., «Col. / C. Bruch» print., «50903» handwr., Reserva Forestal / XI.949 / Wygodzinsky» handwr. red frame, «Typus» print. on red paper, «Cephalolia on white paper, remainings of a black frame, / tucumana / Weise - tipo» handwr. by Bruch, red «Paratipo» handwr., red frame, «Chlamisus / frame, «J. Weise determ. 1904» print., «Cephalolia tucumanus / Monrós [handwr.] / F. Monrós det. 1952 / tucumana / Weise / Det. M. Viana [handwr.] / Museo [print.]» on white paper, remainings of a black Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [print.]» on white frame. cardboard, black frame. Ex BRC. Notes: Blackwelder (1946: 720) recorded the unicolor [Metallactus]. Jacoby 1908: 853-854. species under Cephaloleia, which is the correct Brasil, 1 spec. obtained from Bruch. spelling. Monrós & Viana (1947: 163-164, pl. iv: 16) One spec. «Rep. Chile / 190_ / C. Bruch» print., put C. saccharina Maulik 1929 as a synonym. «Cotypus» print. on pale green paper, «Metallactus / unicolor / Jac.» handwr. by Bruch, red frame. tucumana [Octhispa]. Weise 1922: 31-32. Note: Chile was not included in the original descrip- Tucumán 1100 m a.s.l., 28.I.1905, ex BRC. tion, but the country mentioned on the label may Holot., «Typus» print. on pale green paper, be a mistake of Bruch, or of Jacoby; Jacoby stated «Argentina / Prov. Tucumán / 1100 m 28/I/ 1905 / that he obtained one specimen from Bruch, but the Steinbach» print., date handwr., «Col. / C. Bruch» label «Cotypus» suggests more than one spec. The print., «51054» handwr., red frame, «Octhispa / status of the spec. is, at best, confuse. tucumana / Ws.» handwr. by Bruch, red frame, «Octhisp / tucum» handwr., cut, «Octhispa / unicolor [Physonota]. Burmeister 1870: 280. fossulata / Chap. / Det. M. Viana [handwr.] / Museo Mendoza. Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [print.] [obverse] One synt., on a card, it has a pin hole, a card / X-1947 [handwr.] [reverse]» on white cardboard, with a pupal exuvia, «Mendoza» print. on green black frame. paper, «Col. / Antigua» print., «649» print., «Typus» Note: Monrós & Viana (1947: 307-308, pl.xxvii: print. on red cardboard’. One of us (AOB) added 119) examined this spec., and synonymized O. «Physonota / unicolor / Burmeister 1870 / Typus» tucumana with O. fossulata Chapuis 1877. handwr. on red cardboard; «unicolor Nob. / Rep. Arg. Br.» handwr. by Burmeister on white paper, tucumanensis [Cryptocephalus]. Jacoby 1908: 837 black frame, fastened to the bottom of the drawer. Argentina: Tucumán, in MLP and author’s coll. Note: Recorded as Anacassis fuscata subsp. One synt. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Tucumán / unicolor by Spaeth (1914: 50) and by Blackwelder 15.VII.1900 / C. Bruch» print., date handwr., (1946: 742). «Cotypus» print. on pale green paper, «Cryptocephalus / tucumanensis / Jac.» handwr. by varians [Agathomerus]. Monrós 1945: 146-149, f. Bruch, red frame. Ex BRC. 3. 2 parat. Tucumán ex BRC in MACN. 10 cotypes Salta: Coronel Moldes, Lerma Valley 1100 m a.s.l., tucumanus [Chlamisus]. Monrós 1952b: 622-625, I.1945, 8 of them in MC, 2 in MLP, on Alternanthera f. 92, 117, 149. Tucumán 20.I.1907, 4 parat.; id. phylloxeroides. but 10.XI.1907, 2 parat.; id. but 14.IX.1929, leg. Two parat. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Tucumán / Box, 1 parat.; id. but leg. Girard, 3 parat. All of 190_ / C. Bruch» print., one of them «Agathomerus them ex BRC in MACN. Holot. m Tucumán: Tafí / quadrimaculatus / (J. Guérin) [handwr.] / F. Monrós Viejo, 1914, allot. f Tucumán, leg. Girard 1914, det. 946 [print.]». several parat. in FIML,. other parat. in MC and Notes: The type condition is dubious. Both spec. SCT. seem to be the ones mentioned by Monrós, but they Four parat., «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Tucumán lack both type and identification labels. In the same / 20 I 1907 [on three, 10 II 1907 on one] / C. Bruch» paper Monrós (1945: 155) synonymized varians print., date handwr., «Col. / C. Bruch» print. with with quadrimaculatus Guérin 1845, and presum- red ink, «53390 [on three, 53387 on one]» handwr., ably he removed the labels therefore. Monrós red frame. 3 parat. «Tuc. 1-1917 Girard [on two, (1947c: 183-185, f. 43, pl. 5: 1) included 1-1918 on one]» handwr., «16845» handwr., red quadrimaculatus in the subgenus Mesagathomerus. frame. 1 parat. «Argentina / Tucumán / 14 Nov. 1929» print., date handwr., «H.E. Box / Collector» vianai [Stenispa]. Uhmann 1938: 365-366. Bue- printed, «Col. / C. Bruch» print. with red ink, nos Aires Prov.: Tigre, leg. Viana XI.1937, 2 m, 3 Bachmann & Cabrera: Types of Chrysomelidae 75 f on Scirpus giganteus. Holot. and allot. in Wagner, 1 parat. in BRC; La Rioja, km 72, I.1920, 1 JDC. parat.; San Luis, 3 parat. in BRC, on ‘quillo’, all of Holot. «Buenos Aires / Argentina [printed] / these in MACN. Holot. La Rioja Prov.: Sanagasta, Tigre XI-937 / M.J. Viana [handwr.]», «Col. / C. in MC. Other parat. in FIML, MLP, BM, MC. Bruch» print., «50918» handwr., red frame, One parat. on a card, with the left wing ex- «Holotypus» print. on red cardboard, «Stenispa / tended, «Rep. Argentina / Pr. Santiago d. Estero / vianai / Uh. [handwr.] / Uhmann det. 38 [print.]» 190_ / C. Bruch» print.. 1 parat. «La Rioja k 672 on white paper; «Stenispa / vianai / Uhm. / Det. M. I.1920» handwr. on green paper, reverse white, Viana [handwr.] / Museo Argentino de Ciencias «28410» handwr., red frame. 1 parat. «Argentina / Naturales [print.] [obverse] / X-1947 [handwr.] [re- La Rioja» print.. 3 parat. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. verse] « on white cardboard, black frame. San Luis / 190_ / C. Bruch» print., «Col. / C. Bruch» Notes: Gaedicke & Doebler (1971: 362) reported print., 2 of them «sobre Quillo» handwr., 1 of these, 2 parat., m and f, in DEI. Although Ward et al. in addition «Pnestes? / instabilis Lac.» handwr., red (1976) mentioned that both holot. and allot. were frame. All: «Paratipo» handwr. on white paper, red deposited in the USNM, Staines & Staines (1997: frame, «Dachrys / xerophila / mihi [handwr.] / F. 22) mentioned they have been unable to find the Monrós det. 1951 [print.]» on pink paper. holot., the only specimen deposited is the allot.. UNAVAILABLE NAMES, AND vittata [Microtheca]. Weise 1922: 30. Santiago del NAMES NOT FOUND IN THE LITERATURE Estero. Perhaps a single specimen, as only one AND PRESUMABLY NOT PUBLISHED measure is given. One synt. «Rep. Argentina / Pr. Santiago d. amazonica [Agenysa]. Spaeth Estero / 190_ / C. Bruch» print., «Typus» print. on 1 spec. «Cotipo» print. on red paper, black pale green paper, «Microtheca / vitata / Ws.» handwr. frame; «Amazonas / Rio Yurua / E. Gasbe leg. / ano: by Bruch, red frame, 1902» handwr. and print.; «Agenysa / amazonica / Note: Bechyné (1952: 62) synonymized this nov. cot. f / det. Fr. Spaeth 1927» handwr. and name with M. punctigera Achard 1917. print.; «30003» print.; «Agenysa / caedemadens (Licht.) / Det. M. Viana» handwr. willineri [Eugenysa]. Viana 1968: 8, 16, 48-52, 100, Note: Recorded by Bruch (1914: 374) as in pl. iii: 14, VI: 40. Perú: Montenegro: Marañón Stream litteris; Blackwelder (1946: 751) just quotes Bruch’s 7.X.1961 leg. Williner, holot. m, allot. f. Perú: citation. Tingo María X.1965 leg. Korytkowski, 1 parat. m, all in MACN. Another parat m in CMSM. argentina [Metriona]. Spaeth Holot., allot., one parat. «Peru / Montenegro One spec. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Buenos Aires / Rio Marañon / Leg. Williner [obverse] / 7/X/1961 / 20.IV.1894 / C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; [reverse]» handwr. on white paper; «Holotypus «Typus» print. on pale green paper; «Spaeth det.» [Allotypus, Paratypus]» print. on red [red, yellow] print.; «Metriona / Argentina / Spth.» handwr by cardboard [obverse] / J.M. Viana X-1968 [handwr.] Bruch, red frame; «Metriona [printed] / argentina [reverse]»; «Eugenysa / willineri / Viana / Holotipo [handwr.]» on white paper. Ex BRC. m [Alotipo f, Paratipo]» handwr. on red [red, yel- low] cardboard. argentinae [Chalcophana]. Jacoby Two spec., pinned «Rep. Argentina / Prov. willinki [Temnodachrys (Eudachrys)]. Monrós Catamarca / 20.II.1907 [10.II.1908] / C. Bruch» 1954: 188-189, f. 296. Chaco: Charata, leg. Daguerre print., date handwr.; «Typus [Cotypus]» print. on 3 parat.; Santiago del Estero, 1 parat. ex BRC in pale green paper. One of them, in addition MACN. Holot., m, allot., f Chaco: Pampa del «Chalcophana / argentinae / Jac. type» handwr. by Indio in FIML, MLP, BM, MC, JBC. Bruch, red frame; both «Chalcophana / argentinae Three parat. on cards, on 1 pin, «Argentina / [rest ilegible]», handwr., cut. Ex BRC. Charata . Chaco» print., locality handwr. 1 parat. Note: Recorded by Bruch (1914: 374) as in «Rep. Argentina / Pr. Santiago d. Estero / 190_ / C. litteris; Blackwelder (1946: 751) just quotes Bruch’s Bruch» print., «Col. / C. Bruch» print.. All: citation. «Paratipo» handwr. on white paper, red frame; «Dachrys / willinki / mihi [handwr.] / F. Monrós det. jacobyi [Galerucella]. Brèthes 1951 [printed]» on pink paper. One spec. on a card (remounted, as it has a pin- hole), «S. Fe - L. Brochon» handwr.; «Repreparo / xerophila [Temnodachrys]. Monrós 1954: 201-202, M. Viana / I-1960», handwr.; «Galerucella / Jacobyi f. 307. Santiago del Estero Prov.: Salado River, leg. / Brèthes» handwr. by Brèthes. 76 Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, n. s. 12 (1), 2010 piceidorsis [Cteisella]. Spaeth / X-1947 [handwr.] [reverse]» on white cardboard, One spec. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Tucuman / black frame. 190_ / C. Bruch» print.; «Spaeth det.» print.; Notes: Tucumán was not mentioned in the origi- «Cotypus» print. on pale green paper; «Cteisella nal description; furthermore the identification la- piceidorsis Späth - Cotipo» handwr. by Bruch, red bel of Bruch does not mention «Tipo» as he used to frame; «Cteisella piceidorsis m. cotyp!» handwr., cut. do. Monrós & Viana (1947: 283-285, pl. xxvi: 115) Ex BRC. Note: Bruch (1914: 373) and Blackwelder (1946: gracilis [Uroplata]. Weise 1905: 84-85. Brasil: 755), refer the name to Spaeth in litteris. Jatahy, col. Donckier. One spec. «Cotypus» print. on pale green pa- sculpturata [Ctenochira]. Spaeth per; «Paraguay / Sa. Trinidad / IX-1913» print., date One spec., pinned «Rep. Argentina / Gob. handwr.; «51049» handwr., red frame; «Octhispa / Misiones / XI.1909 / C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; gracilis / Ws» handwr. by Bruch, red frame; «Octhisp «Cotypus» print. on pale green paper; «Spaeth det.» / gracilis» handwr., cut; «Octhispa / gracilis / (Weise) print.; «Ctenochira sculpturata Spth.» handwr. by / Det. M. Viana» [handwr.] / Museo Argentino de Bruch, red frame; «Ctenochira sculpturata m. Ciencias Naturales [print.] [obverse] / X-1947 cotype» handwr., cut. [handwr.] [reverse]». Note: Bruch (1914: 373) and Blackwelder (1946: Notes: The spec. was taken after the publica- 757), refer the name to Spaeth in litteris. tion date. Recorded under Octhispa by Weise (1911: 35). takasei [Chlamisus]. Bokermann One spec. «Coleção / Bokermann» print. on infirmior [Probaenia]. Weise 1906: 225. Buenos dark red paper, «Takase / Sao Bernardo / 4-XII-1960 Aires Prov. XI.1903. / Werner col.» handwr., black frame, «643» typed, One spec. labelled «Cotypus» print. on pale «Chlamisus / takasei / Paratipo m [handwr.] / green paper; «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Buenos Aires Bokermann det. [print.]» on dark red paper, black / 5.III.1905 / C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; «51018» frame. Ex AMC. handwr., red frame; «Probaenia / crenata / ab. nigripes / (Chap.) / Det. M. Viana [handwr.] / Museo variolarius [Chlamisus]. Monrós Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [print., obverse] / Two spec. One of them «S. Tomé / Corrientes / X-1947 [reverse]» handwr. on white paper, black 11-924» print., black frame, date handwr., «m», frame. Ex BRC. «Holotypus» print. on red paper. The other one Note: The spec. was not mentioned in the origi- «Santo Tomé - Corrientes / G. Pellerano» handwr., nal description, and it is not clear if it was even «53393» handwr., red frame, «f», «Allotypus» intended to conform the type series, as a single date print. on red paper, «Chlamisus / variolarius / mihi was recorded (see at the main list). [handwr.] / F. Monrós det. 1950 [print.]» on pink paper. interrupta [Galerucella]. Jacoby 1904b: 523-524. Note: Recorded as a m and a f of C. scortillus Mendoza, 2 spec. in SKM. from Santo Tomé in MACN by Monrós (1952b: 602). One spec. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Buenos Aires Perhaps he recognized the identity and decided not / 190_ / C. Bruch» print.; «Cotypus» handwr. by to publish the supposed new species. Bruch on pale green paper; «Galerucella / interrupta / Jac.» handwr. by Bruch, red frame. Ex BRC. SPECIMENS LABELLED AS TYPES Notes: Buenos Aires was not mentioned in the BUT NOT INCLUDED IN THE ORIGINAL original description. Considered a synonym of SERIES OR DESIGNATED IN A NON AC- Sarigueia subvittata (Demay 1838) = Galeruca CEPTED TYPE CATEGORY fulvonigra Fairmaire 1883 = G. murina Blanchard in Orbigny 1843 = G. nigropicta Boheman 1959, ferruginea [Uroplata]. Weise 1905: 88-89. Brasil: by Bechyné & Springlová de Bechyné (1970: 133). Jatahy, coll. Donckier. One spec. «Typus» print. on pale green paper interrupta [Probaenia crenata ab.]. Monrós & «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Tucumán / XI.1899 / C. Viana 1947: 273, pl. xxii: 91. Tucumán Prov., ex Bruch» print., date handwr.; «Col. / C. Bruch» print.; BRC; Jujuy Prov., and Paraguay: Santa Trinidad, «51035» handwr., red frame; «Uroplata / ferruginea parat. in MACN. Holot. [repository not stated, / Weise» handwr. by Bruch, red frame; «Uroplata / presumably in MC], parat. in MC, MVC, etc., from ferruginea» handwr., cut; «Uroplata / (Codiohispa) Salta, Jujuy and Tucumán Prov. bilineata / Chap. / Det. Viana [handwr.] / Museo Eleven spec. One of them «Tucuman» print. Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [print.] [obverse] on green paper; «Col. / Antigua» printed; «51067» Bachmann & Cabrera: Types of Chrysomelidae 77 handwr., red frame. Two of them «Rep. Argentina / Note: Misiones Prov. was not mentioned in the Prov. Tucumán / XI.1899 [1.1.1904] / C. Bruch» original description. Moreover the second spec. print., dates handwr., «51014 [51015]» handwr., red bears a label with green frame, used by Bruch only frame; on one, in addition, «P. ornata / v. nigripes much later. Both spec. seem to have been identi- Chap.» handwr. by Bruch, red frame. Four of them, fied by Spaeth, who recorded the species under on 3 pins, «Argentina / Jujuy» print.; «17253» Philaspis (Spaeth 1914: 123). handwr., red frame. One of them «Argentina / Salta», print.; «33438' handwr., red frame. Three uhmanni [Sternostena laeta ab.]. Monrós & Viana of them, on 2 pins, «Argentina / Tucumán» print.; 1947: 198, pl. xi: 34. Cotypes in MACN, MVC, MC «51222 [16900]» handwr., red frame. All «Probaenia from the same localities as the typical form, [Bue- / crenata / ab: interrupta / Monrós-Viana. Paratipo nos Aires Prov.:] Tandil, Rosas, Las Flores, Gorchs; [handwr.] / Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [Mendoza Prov.:] Mendoza; Uruguay; Perú. [print.] [obverse] / X-1947 [handwr.] [reverse]» One spec. «Tandil» handwr. by Bruch, «Col. / Note: The name is not available, as it was pub- C. Bruch» print.; «50937» handwr., red frame, lished as an aberratio. «Sternostena / laeta Ws.» handwr., cut. 1 spec. «B.- A. C. / Girado» handwr., «Col. / A. Breyer» print., ornatipennis [Monachus]. Jacoby 1908: 831-832. «51119» handwr., red frame. 2 spec. on 1 pin «Lin- Tucumán Prov. coln B.-A. / C. Girado» handwr., «Col. / A. Breyer» One spec. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Buenos Aires print., «51118» handwr., red frame. 21 spec. on 13 / 1.1896 / C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; «Cotypus» pins «Rosas. F.C. Sud / Provincia de Buenos Aires / print. on pale green paper; «Monachus / ornatipennis Juan B. Daguerre» print., «50938» on 6, «26907» / Jac. 1907» handwr. by Bruch, red frame. on 3, «24574» on 4" handwr., red frame., 1 of them Notes: Buenos Aires was not mentioned in the «Foto» handwr. on pale green paper, and original description. Only one measurement is «Sternostena / laeta / Ws. var. [handwr. by Bruch] / given, suggesting that only one spec. was examined. C. Bruch determ. [print.]» on white paper, black Recorded as Lexiphanes ornatipennis by frame, 1 of them «Dibujado» [drawn], almost all Blackwelder (1946: 643). Monachus Chevrolat 1837 with «Col. / C. Bruch» print.. 1 spec. «Argentina / is a junior homonym of Monachus Fleming 1822 Bs. Aires» print., «30565» handwr., red frame. 3 and of Monachus Kaup 1829. spec. «Bs. Aires / Argentina / Las Flores / J.B. Daguerre» print., locality handwr., «51208» reimoseri [Chelymorpha]. Spaeth 1928: 3, foot- handwr., red frame. 6 spec. on 5 pins «Buenos Aires note. Entre Ríos Prov.: Paraná, leg. Reimoser, some / Argentina / Tandil VI-1937 / M.J. Viana» print., 30 spec. in NHMW. date handwr. «41240 [on 5, 51117 on 1]» handwr., One spec., pinned, an antenna on a card, «Rep. red frame. All «Cotypus» print. on red cardboard, Argentina / Prov. Tucumán / XII.1906 / C. Bruch» and «Sternostena / laeta / ab: uhmanni / Monros- print., date handwr.; «Cotypus» print. on pale green Viana / Cotipo [handwr.] / Museo Argentino de paper; «Spaeth det.» print.; «Chelymorpha / Ciencias Naturales [print.]» on red cardboard. Reimoseri / Spth.» handwr. by Bruch, red frame; Note: The name is not available, as it was pub- «Chelymorph [print.] / Reimoseri / cotyp! lished as an aberratio. [handwr.]», cut. Ex BRC. Note: Tucumán was not mentioned in the origi- vigintinotatus [Oedionychis]. Jacoby 1894: 627- nal description, and no reference was made to speci- 628, pl.xxxviii: 10. Brasil: Rio Grande, seemingly a mens from BRC. single spec., as only one measure is given. One spec. «Rep. Argentina / Prov. Buenos Aires / seriatopunctata [Odontionycha]. Spaeth 1901: 19.XI.1904 / C. Bruch» print., date handwr. «Cotypus» 578-579. Paraguay; Brasil: Bahia. handwr. by Bruch on pale green paper, «Oedionychis Two spec. on cards, but originally pinned. One / 20-notata / Jac.» handwr. by Bruch, red frame, of them «Rep. Argentina / Gob. Misiones / 4.II.1896 «Oedionychis / 20-notata Jac.» handwr, cut. / C. Bruch» print., date handwr.; «Typus» print. on Note: The spec. was taken after the publication pale green paper; «Cassida / seriatopctt. / Spth» date. Recorded as Oedionychus vigintinotatus by handwr. by Bruch, red frame; «Cassida [print.] / Blackwelder (1946: 713). seriatopctta. m. [handwr.]» cut. The other «Rep. Argentina / Gob. Misiones / 190_ / C. Bruch» print.; BIBLIOGRAPHY «Cotypus» print. on pale green paper; «Philaspis / seriatopctt. / Spaeth» handwr. by Bruch, green Barber, H.S. & J.C. Bridwell. 1940. Dejean catalogue frame; «Cassida [printed] / seriatopctta m. names (Coleoptera). Bull. Brooklyn entom. Soc..35: [handwr.]», cut. Ex BRC. 1-12. 78 Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, n. s. 12 (1), 2010

Bechyné, J. 1952. Nachträge zu den Katalogen von Pic y «Chalepus (Xenochalepus) tandilensis» n. sp. Blackwelder und Junk - Schenkling der neotro- Physis, B. Aires 11 (39): 213-224. pischen echten Chrysomeliden (Col. Phytophaga). Bryant, G.E. 1951. New species of Halticinae (Coleop- Entom. Arb. Mus. Frey 3 (1): 1-62. tera, Chrysomelidae) from the Argentine Repub- Bechyné, J. 1953. Katalog der neotropischen Eu- lic. Annls. Mag. nat. Hist. 12th ser. 4: 938-942. molpiden (Col. Phytoph. Chrysomeloidea). Entom. Burmeister, H. 1870. Cassidina Argentina. Anmer- Arb. Mus. Frey 4: 26-303. kungen zu Boheman’s Monographia Cassidiarum, Bechyné, J. & M. Springlová de Bechyné. 1970. Beiträge die Arten des La Plata - Gebietes betreffend. zur Kenntnis der Insektenfauna Boliviens. XX. Stettiner entom. Zeitg. 31: 273-281. Coleoptera XV. Beiträge zur Galerucidenfauna Burmeister, H. 1877. Phytophaga argentina. Stettiner Boliviens (Col., Phytophaga). Veröff. zool. entom. Zeitg. 38: 52-67. Staatssamml. München 14: 123-190. Butte, J.G. 1967. The revision of the tribe Chalepini, Berg, C. 1900. Notice sur les espèces du genre Alurnus especially the genera Chalepus Thunb., Odontota F. appartenant à la faune argentine. Comun. Mus. Chev. and Xenochalepus Weise, of America north nacion. Buenos Aires 1 (7): 252-257. of Mexico (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Hispinae). Blackwelder, R.E. 1946. Checklist of the coleopterous Dissert. Abstr. 28B: 219-220. insects of Mexico, Central America, the West Indies, Chûjô, M. 1940. Fulcidacinae of Formosa (Col. and South America. Part 4. Bull. U. S. nation. Mus. Chrysomelidae). Trans. nat. Hist. Soc. Formosa 30: 185 (4): i-iii, 551-763. 265-293 [Not seen, cited after Karren, 1966] Bokermann, W. 1962a. Nova espécie de Chlamisus, com Chûjô, M. 1955, 1956. A taxonomic study on the notas sôbre Chlamisus subspinosus Klug e espécies Chrysomelidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) from Formosa. correlatas (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Chlami- IX. Subfamily Chlamisinae (1). Techn. Bull. Ka- sinae) (12a contribuição). Studia entom. (n. Ser.) 5: gawa agric. Coll. 7, 1955: 51-59. Idem (2) ibidem 7, 277-288. 1956: 153-167. Bokermann, W. 1962b. Novas espécies brasileiras de Descarpentries, A. & A. Villiers. 1959. Les types de la «Chlamisus» (9a contribuição) (Coleoptera, Chry- collection M. Pic. I. Chrysomelinae et Hispinae du somelidae, Chlamisinae). Revta. brasil. Biol. 22 (2): Nouveau-Monde. Bull. Mus. nation. Hist. nat., Paris 153-166. 2e Sér. 31 (2): 137-154. Bokermann, W. 1964. Novos Chlamisinae neotropicais Fischer, C.R. 1935. Os coleopteros phytophagos da tribu (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) (20a contribuição). Alurnini, pragas das palmeiras (Chrysomelidae, Revta. brasil. Entom. 11: 63-83. Hispinae). Revta. Entom., Rio de Janeiro 5 (3): 257- Bondar, G. 1940a. Notas entomológicas da Bahia. V. 292. Revta. Entom., Rio de Janeiro 11 (1-2): 199-214. Gaedicke, R. & H. Döbler, 1971. Katalog der in den Bondar, G. 1940b. Notas entomológicas da Bahia. VI. Sammlungen des ehemaligen Deutschen Entomo- Revta. Entom., Rio de Janeiro 11 (3): 842-861. logischen Instituts aufbewahrten Typen. VII. Bondar, G. 1941. Notas entomológicas da Baía. VII. (Coleoptera: Hispinae). Beitr. Entom. 21 (3-6): 341-395. Revta. Entom., Rio de Janeiro 12 (1-2): 268-303. Hincks, W.D. 1950. Some nomenclatorial notes on Bondar, G. 1942. Notas entomológicas da Baía. IX. Chrysomelidae (Col.). No 2. Galerucinae; correc- Revta. Entom., Rio de Janeiro 13 (1-2): 1-39. tions and additions. No 3. Cassidinae. Annls. Mag. Borowiec, L. 1996. Faunistic records of Neotropical nat. Hist. 12th Ser. 3: 86-88, 506-512. Cassidinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Polish Hincks, W. D. 1952. The genera of the Cassidinae Journal of Entomology 65: 119-251. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Trans. roy. Soc. Lon- Borowiec, L., 1999. A world catalogue of the Cassidinae don., 103: 327-358. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Biologica Silesiae, International Commission on zoological Nomenclature. Wroc³aw, 476 pp. 1999. International Code of zoological Nomencla- Borowiec, L. 2002. New records of Neotropical ture, 4th Edit.: xxix + 306 p. Cassidinae, with description of three new species Jacoby, M. 1894. Descriptions of new species of (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Genus, 13: 43-138. Coleoptera of the genera Oedionychis and As- Bowditch, F.C. 1915. Notes on some South American phaera. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1894: 609-631. Halticidae. Trans. amer. entom. Soc. 41: 487-509. Jacoby, M. 1900. Descriptions of new species and a new Brèthes, J. 1922. Descripción de varios coleópteros de genus of South American Eumolpidae, with re- Buenos Aires. Anls. Soc. cient. argent. 94: 263-305. marks on some of the genera. Trans. roy. Soc. Lon- Brèthes, J. 1925. Nunquam otiosus, B. Aires 4 (2): 11-16. don 199 (4): 453-510. Brèthes, J. 1928. Contribution pour la connaissance des Jacoby, M. 1904a. Descriptions of some new species of Chrysomelides du Chili. Revta. chilena Hist. nat. Mastostethus (Phytophagous Coleoptera). Ento- 32: 204-220. mologist 37: 63-68. Bruch, C. 1908. Ein neuer Megalopus aus Argentinien Jacoby, M. 1904b. Descriptions of some new species of (Col. Chrysom.). Deutsche entom. Zeitschr. 1908: Phytophagous Coleoptera obtained by Baron E. 716-717. Nordenskiöld in Bolivia and the Argentine Repub- Bruch, C. 1914. Catálogo sistemático de los coleópteros lic. Ark. Zool. 1: 513-524. de la República Argentina. Pars IX. Revta. Mus. Jacoby, M. 1908. Descriptions of new species of South- La Plata 19 (2) [2a Ser. 6]: 346-400. American beetles of the cryptocephaline division Bruch, C. 1933. Notas biológicas sobre tres híspidos of the family Chrysomelidae. Proc. zool. Soc. Lon- «Sternosteana laeta» Ws., «Octotoma Daguerrei» don 1907: 829-855. Bachmann & Cabrera: Types of Chrysomelidae 79

Karren, J.B. 1966. A revision of the genus Exema of Pic, M. 1928a. Nouveaux Coléoptères de la République America, North of Mexico (Chrysomelidae, Argentine. Revta. Soc. entom. argent. 2 (1): 49-52. Coleoptera). Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 46 (18): 647- Pic, M. 1928b. Divers Coléoptères nouveaux de la 695. République Argentine. Revta. Soc. entom. argent. Lawrence, J.F. & A.F.N. Newton. 1995. Families and 2 (2): 99-102. subfamilies of Coleoptera (with selected genera, Pic, M. 1928c. Coléoptères exotiques en partie notes, references and data on family-group names): nouveaux (suite). Echange 44: 4, 7-8, 10-11. 779-1006. In Papaluk, J. & S.A. Šlipiñski (Ed.). Bi- Pic, M. 1929. Coléoptères de l’Amérique méridionale. ology, phylogeny, and classification of Coleoptera. Revta. Soc. entom. argent. 2 (3): 182-184. Papers celebrating the 80th birthday of Roy A. Pic, M. 1930. Nouveaux Coléoptères de diverses Crowson 1, 2: ix + 1092 p. Warszawa, Muzeum i familles. Revta. Soc. entom. argent. 3: 43-46. Instytut Zoologii, Polska Akademia Nauk. Spaeth, F. 1901. Zwei neue Cassididen von Paraguay Leng, C.W. 1918. Notes on some changes in the list of gesammelt von Herrn G. Boggiani. Annli. Mus. civ. Coleoptera. J. New York entom. Soc. 26: 201-211. Stor. nat. Genova 40 (2) (2a ser. 20), 1900: 577-579. Moldenke, A. 1981. A generic reclassification of the Spaeth, F. 1905. Beschreibung neuer Cassidinen nebst New World Clytrinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) synonymischen Bemerkungen. V. Verh. zool.-bot. with a description of new species. Entom. Arb. Mus. Ges. Wien 55: 79-118. G. Frey 29: 75-116. Spaeth, F. 1909. Beschreibung neuer Cassidinen nebst Monrós, F. 1944. Descripción de un nuevo clítrido synonymischen Bemerkungen. VII. Verh. zool.-bot. argentino (Col., Chrysomelidae). Revta. Fac. Agron. Ges. Wien 59: 364-397. Veter. Univ. Buenos Aires 11 (1): 148-152. Spaeth, F. 1913. Kritische Studien über den Umfang Monrós, F. 1945. A propósito de algunos Chry- und die Begrenzung mehrerer Cassiden-Gattungen someloidea neotropicales (Coleoptera). Notas Mus. nebst Beschreibung neuer amerikanischen. Arten. La Plata, Zool. 10 (86 bis): 143-155. Arch. Naturgesch. 79A (6): 126-164. Monrós, F. 1947a. Descripciones y comentarios relativos Spaeth, F. 1914. Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae. In a Chrysomeloidea (Coleoptera). Acta zool. lilloana Schenkling (Ed.) Coleopt. Catal. (62): 1-182. 4, 1947: 155-174. Spaeth, F. 1928. Neue Cassidinen aus dem Museum zu Monrós, F. 1947b. Revisión del género Plectonycha Lac. Stockholm. Ark. Zool. 19A (30): 1-11. (Col. Chrysomeloidea). Anls. Soc. cient. argent. 144: Staines, C.L. & Riley, E.G. 1994. Nomenclature and 45-64. status of Xenochalepus and Hemichalepus (Coleop- Monrós, F. 1947c. Revisión de los Megalopidae tera: Chrysomelidae: Hispinae), J. Kansas entom. argentinos. Revta. Soc. entom. argent. 13: 150-217. Soc. 67 (2): 218-220. Monrós, F. 1948. Notas sobre «Eupoda» argentinos (Col. Staines, C.L. & S. Staines 1997. Type specimens of Chrysomelidae). Acta zool. lilloana 5, 1947: 203-220. Hispinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in the Na- Monrós, F. 1950. Descripciones y comentarios sobre tional Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian «Chlamisinae» neotropicales (Coleoptera, Institution. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Chrysomelidae). Revta. brasil. Biol. 10 (4): 409-424. 585: 25 pp. Monrós, F. 1951. Notas sobre Criocerinae (Coleoptera). Uhmann, E. 1937a. Amerikanische Hispinen aus dem Acta zool. lilloana 11, 1951: 467-482. Zoologischen Museum der Universität Berlin. VI. Monrós, F. 1952a. Seis nuevas especies de Criocerine Teil. Die Gattung Uroplata Chap. 68. Beitrag zur [sic] del Noroeste Argentino (Col. Chrysomelidae). Kenntnis der Hispinen (Col. Chrys.) Festschr. zum Acta zool. lilloana 10, 1951: 33-49. 60. Geburtstage von Professor Dr. Embrik Strand Monrós, F. 1952b. Revisión de las especies argentinas 3: 451-467. de Chlamisinae (Col., Chrysomelidae) (5a contri- Uhmann, E. 1937b. Amerikanische Hispinen aus dem bución al conocimiento de Chlamisinae). Acta zool. Zoologischen Museum der Universität Berlin. I. lilloana 10, 1951: 489-672. Teil. Subfamilie Amplipalpini und Gattung Sce- Monrós, F. 1954. Revisión sistemática de las especies loenopla Chevr. 64. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der de «Clytrinae» de la Argentina, Uruguay y Chile Hispinen (Col. Chrys.). Mitt. zool. Mus. Berlin 22: (Col., Chrysomelidae). Acta zool. lilloana 14, 1953: 189-213. 5-274. Uhmann, E. 1938. Hispinen aus Argentinien. Revta. Monrós, F. 1956. Sur le genre Megamerus Mac Leay Entom., Rio de Janeiro 9 (3-4): 364-370. (Col. Chrysomelidae). Rev. franç. Entom. 23 (2): Uhmann, E. 1951. Hispinae von Brasilien und Ar- 104-115. gentinien. 130. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Hispinae Monrós, F. 1957. Notas y descripciones de Criocerinae (Coleopt. Chrysomel.). Acta zool. lilloana 12: 331- (Col. Chrysomelidae). Boln. Acad. nac. Cienc. 341. Córdoba 11 (1): 171-187. Viana, M.J. 1964. Nueva especie de Brasil del subgénero Monrós, F. 1959. Notes on Lamprosomatinae Nebroma Spaeth: Omocera (Nebroma) martinezi (Chrysomelidae). Coleopt’s Bull. 12, 1958: 29-33. (Coleopt., Cassidinae, Omocerini). Neotrópica, La Monrós, F. & M.J. Viana. 1947. Revisión sistemática de Plata 10 (32): 63-66. los Hispidae argentinos (Insecta, Coleop., Viana, M.J. 1966. Goniochenia (Baranosa) seabrai sp. Chrysomeloid.). Anls. Mus. argent. Cienc. nat. 42 n. del Brasil, Amazonas. Neotrópica, La Plata 12 (Entom. 162): 125-324. (39): 115-119. [Serie extra Mus. argent. Cienc. nat. Pic, M. 1927. Coléoptères du Globe. Mélanges exot.- (42): 115-119.] entom. 50: 1-36. Viana, M.J. 1968. Revisión sistemática de las 80 Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, n. s. 12 (1), 2010

«Eugenysini» Spaeth con nuevas especies y catálogo Weise, J. 1905. Beschreibug einiger Hispinen. Arch. bibliográfico de las tribus. Revta. Mus. argent. Naturgesch. 71 (1): 49-104. Cienc. nat., Entom. 3 (1): 1-106. Weise, J. 1906. Hispinae, Coccinellidae et Endomy- Ward, R. A. F. C. Thompson, A. S. Menke, and O.S. Flint. chidae Argentinia et vecinitate e collectione 1976. The United States National Entomological Bruchiana. Revta. Mus. La Plata 12: 221-231. Collections. 47pp. Washington, D.C : Smithsonian Weise, J. 1911. Chrysomelidae, Hispinae. In Schenkling Institution Press. (Ed.) Coleopt. Catal. (35): 1-94. Weise, J. 1904. Einige neue Cassidinen und Hispinen. Weise, J. 1922. Coleoptera e collectione Bruchiana. Anls. Deutsche entom. Zeitschr. 1904 (2): 433-452. Soc. cient. argent. 94 (2): 30-40.

Recibido: 14-XII-2009 Aceptado: 1-III-2010