DOCSLIB.ORG

Jewel Basin Timber Salvage 2021-06-23

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jewel Basin Timber Salvage 2021-06-23 Jewel Basin Timber Salvage Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Environmental Assessment Checklist Project Name: Jewel Basin Timber Salvage Proposed Implementation Date: June 2021 Proponent: Kalispell Unit, Northwest Land Office, Montana DNRC County: Flathead Type and Purpose of Action Description of Proposed Action: The Kalispell Unit of the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC) is proposing the Jewel Basin Timber Salvage. The project is located approximately 5 air miles northeast of Bigfork, Montana. (refer to Attachments vicinity map A-1 and project map A-2) and includes the following sections: Legal Total Treated Beneficiary Description Acres Acres Common Schools Public Buildings MSU 2nd Grant T27N R19W Section 1 160 14 MSU Morrill Eastern College-MSU/Western College-U of M Montana Tech University of Montana School for the Deaf and Blind T27N R19W Section 2 641.28 190 Pine Hills School Veterans Home Public Land Trust Acquired Land Objectives of the project include: • Generating revenue for the trust beneficiaries, by salvaging blown down and wind damaged timber before it loses economic value as is directed in MCA 77-5-207. • Salvaging blown down trees to reduce fuel loading and mitigate the potential for high intensity fires adjacent to private property. 1 Jewel Basin Timber Salvage Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Proposed activities include: Action Quantity Proposed Harvest Activities # Acres Clearcut Seed Tree Shelterwood Selection Commercial Thinning Salvage 204 Total Treatment Acres Proposed Forest Improvement Treatment # Acres Pre-commercial Thinning Planting Proposed Road Activities # Miles New permanent road construction New temporary road construction Road maintenance Road reconstruction Road abandoned Road reclaimed Other Activities Duration of Activities: 5 months Implementation Period: June 2021 – November 2021 The lands involved in this proposed project are held in trust by the State of Montana. (Enabling Act of February 22, 1889; 1972 Montana Constitution, Article X, Section 11). The Board of Land Commissioners and the DNRC are required by law to administer these trust lands to produce the largest measure of reasonable and legitimate return over the long run for the beneficiary institutions (Section 77-1-202, MCA). The DNRC would manage lands involved in this project in accordance with: The State Forest Land Management Plan (DNRC 1996), Administrative Rules for Forest Management (ARM 36.11.401 through 471), The Montana DNRC Forested State Trust Lands Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) (DNRC 2010) and all other applicable state and federal laws. 2 Jewel Basin Timber Salvage Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Project Development SCOPING: • DATE: o August 7, 2020 through August 21, 2020 • PUBLIC SCOPED: o The scoping notice was posted on the DNRC Website: http://dnrc.mt.gov/public- interest/public-notices o Emails were sent to adjacent landowners and the statewide scoping list that included state, county, tribal, and non-government organizations. • AGENCIES SCOPED: o DNRC, FWP, Tribal Agencies • COMMENTS RECEIVED: o 11 total comments, all e-mails. o Concerns: Wildfire potential after treatment, logging near recreational trails, forest health, impacts to wildlife, carbon storage, and soil erosion. See Attachment B for comments and responses document. o Results (how were concerns addressed): The DNRC will be reducing fire hazard through this salvage by removing a large amount of potential ladder and ground fuels. All logging slash will be treated in accordance with the State Fire Hazard Reduction law. All trails within the project area will remain passable after harvest activities. Some short-term temporary closures of trails may be in order, and all logs blocking trails or presenting a hazard to trail users will be removed during harvest. Removing wind thrown trees would also help ensure forest health, by providing space for regeneration and avoiding infestations of Douglas fir beetles. Wildlife mitigations include leaving snags and standing green trees, as well as leaving some slash for ground cover. Many of the trees harvested will be turned into forest products, which will continue to store the carbon sequestered by the growing trees. All roads and skid trails used during the project will be designed in such a way and have appropriate mitigations to prevent soil erosion during and after harvest. DNRC specialists were consulted, including: Leah Breidinger, DNRC wildlife biologist; Tony Nelson, DNRC hydrologist; Patrick Rennie, DNRC Archeologist. Internal and external issues and concerns were incorporated into project planning and design and will be implemented in associated contracts. OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES WITH JURISDICTION, LIST OF PERMITS NEEDED: (Conservation Easements, Army Corps of Engineers, road use permits, etc.) • United States Fish & Wildlife Service- DNRC is managing the habitats of threatened and endangered species on this project by implementing the Montana DNRC Forested Trust Lands HCP and the associated Incidental Take Permit that was issued by the United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) in February of 2012 under Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act. The HCP identifies specific conservation strategies for managing the habitats of grizzly bear, Canada lynx, and three fish species: bull trout, 3 Jewel Basin Timber Salvage Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation westslope cutthroat trout, and Columbia redband trout. This project complies with the HCP. The HCP can be found at http://dnrc.mt.gov/divisions/trust/forest- management/hcp. • Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)- The DNRC is classified as a major open burner by DEQ and is issued a permit from DEQ to conduct burning activities on state lands managed by DNRC. As a major open-burning permit holder, DNRC agrees to comply with the limitations and conditions of the permit. • Montana/Idaho Airshed Group- The DNRC is a member of the Montana/Idaho Airshed Group which was formed to minimize or prevent smoke impacts while using fire to accomplish land management objectives and/or fuel hazard reduction (Montana/Idaho Airshed Group 2006). The Group determines the delineation of airsheds and impact zones throughout Idaho and Montana. Airsheds describe those geographical areas that have similar atmospheric conditions, while impact zones describe any area in Montana or Idaho that the Group deems smoke sensitive and/or having an existing air quality problem (Montana/Idaho Airshed Group 2006). As a member of the Airshed Group, DNRC agrees to burn only on days approved for good smoke dispersion as determined by the Smoke Management Unit. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: No-Action Alternative: No timber salvage operations would occur, and no revenue would be generated for school trust beneficiaries. Blown down and wind damaged trees would lose economic value. Forest fuels would not be managed to lessen the potential for crown fires near private property. Action Alternative: Approximately 350 thousand board feet of blown down and wind damaged timber would be salvaged from 204 acres and would generate income for trust beneficiaries. Fuel loadings would be reduced next to private property. Impacts on the Physical Environment Evaluation of the impacts on the No-Action and Action Alternatives including direct, secondary, and cumulative impacts on the Physical Environment. VEGETATION: Vegetation Existing Conditions: There are no rare or endangered plants present in the harvest area. There is no old growth timber in the harvest area. Some of the harvest area will occur in salvage/sanitation units that were harvested in 2014 for insects and disease. These previously salvaged areas mainly consist of Douglas fir and some grand fir. Portions of the salvage units that have not undergone recent harvest primarily consist of Douglas fir, grand fir, western larch, with some scattered Engelmann spruce and lodgepole pine. All areas within the salvage units have an abundance of windthrown and weakened trees due to a significant wind event. The vast majority of windthrown and weakened trees consist of Douglas fir and grand fir, along with some Engelmann spruce. The resulting damage has created an opportunity to salvage approximately 1,715 board feet per acre. 4 Jewel Basin Timber Salvage Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Impact Can Comment Impact Be Vegetation Direct Secondary Cumulative Number Mitigated? No Low Mod High No Low Mod High No Low Mod High No-Action Noxious Weeds X X X Y Rare Plants X X X Vegetative community X X X Old Growth X X X Action Noxious Weeds X X X Y V-1 Rare Plants X X X Vegetative community X X X Y V-1, V-2 Old Growth X X X Comments: V-1: This salvage harvest and associated road maintenance may lead to ground disturbance that would promote an increase in noxious weed cover. V-2: Blown down and wind damaged trees could increase populations of Douglas-fir bark beetle. Vegetation Mitigations: Salvage of blown down and wind damaged trees prior to the spring of 2021 would remove population build-ups of bark beetles in tree boles before their emergence in April or May of 2021.The windthrown trees in the proposed salvage units would be harvested and sold for forest products. Slash generated from the harvest would be piled and burned the following fall. SOIL DISTURBANCE AND PRODUCTIVITY: Soil Disturbance and Productivity Existing Conditions: The proposed project area has a combination of moderate standard
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Six Adventure Road Trips
    Easy Drives, Big Fun, and Planning Tips Six Adventure Road Trips DAY HIKES, FLY-FISHING, SKIING, HISTORIC SITES, AND MUCH MORE A custom guidebook in partnership with Montana Offi ce of Tourism and Business Development and Outside Magazine Montana Contents is the perfect place for road tripping. There are 3 Glacier Country miles and miles of open roads. The landscape is stunning and varied. And its towns are welcoming 6 Roaming the National Forests and alluring, with imaginative hotels, restaurants, and breweries operated by friendly locals. 8 Montana’s Mountain Yellowstone and Glacier National Parks are Biking Paradise the crown jewels, but the Big Sky state is filled with hundreds of equally awesome playgrounds 10 in which to mountain bike, trail run, hike, raft, Gateways to Yellowstone fish, horseback ride, and learn about the region’s rich history, dating back to the days of the 14 The Beauty of Little dinosaurs. And that’s just in summer. Come Bighorn Country winter, the state turns into a wonderland. The skiing and snowboarding are world-class, and the 16 Exploring Missouri state offers up everything from snowshoeing River Country and cross-country skiing to snowmobiling and hot springs. Among Montana’s star attractions 18 Montana on Tap are ten national forests, hundreds of streams, tons of state parks, and historic monuments like 20 Adventure Base Camps Little Bighorn Battlefield and the Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail. Whether it’s a family- 22 friendly hike or a peaceful river trip, there’s an Montana in Winter experience that will recharge your spirit around every corner in Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Official 2018-2019 Visitor Guide
    KALISPELL MONTANA OFFICIAL 2018-2019 VISITOR GUIDE #DISCOVERKALISPELL 888-888-2308 DISCOVERKALISPELL.COM DISCOVER KALISPELL TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 DISCOVER KALISPELL 6 GETTING HERE 7 GLACIER NATIONAL PARK 10 DAY HIKES 11 SCENIC DRIVES 12 WILD & SCENIC 14 QUICK PICKS 23 FAMILY TIME 24 FLATHEAD LAKE 25 EVENTS 26 LODGING 28 EAT & DRINK 32 LOCAL FLAVOR 35 CULTURE 37 SHOPPING 39 PLAN A MEETING 41 COMMUNITY 44 RESOURCES CONNECTING WITH KALISPELL To help with your trip planning or to answer questions during your visit: Kalispell Visitor Information Center Photo: Tom Robertson, Foys To Blacktail Trails Robertson, Foys To Photo: Tom 15 Depot Park, Kalispell, MT 59901 406-758-2811or 888-888-2308 DiscoverKalispellMontana @visit_Kalispell DiscoverKalispellMontana Discover Kalispell View mobile friendly guide or request a mailed copy at: WWW.DISCOVERKALISPELL.COM Cover Photo: Tyrel Johnson, Glacier Park Boat Company’s Morning Eagle on Lake Josephine www.discoverkalispell.com | 888-888-2308 3 DISCOVER KALISPELL WELCOME TO KALISPELL Photos: Tom Robertson, Kalispell Chamber, Mike Chilcoat Robertson, Kalispell Chamber, Photos: Tom here the spirit of Northwest Montana lives. Where the mighty mountains of the Crown of the Continent soar. Where the cold, clear Flathead River snakes from wild lands in Glacier National Park and the Bob WMarshall Wilderness to the largest freshwater lake in the west. Where you can plan ahead for a trip of wonder—or let each new moment lead your adventures. Follow the open road to see what’s at the very end. Lay out the map and chart a course to its furthest corner. Or explore the galleries, museums, and shops in historic downtown Kalispell—and maybe let the bakery tempt you into an unexpected sweet treat.
    [Show full text]
  • COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL COPYRIGHTED I
    Avalanche Campground (MT), 66 Big Horn Equestrian Center (WY), Index Avenue of the Sculptures (Billings, 368 MT), 236 Bighorn Mountain Loop (WY), 345 Bighorn Mountains Trail System INDEX A (WY), 368–369 AARP, 421 B Bighorn National Forest (WY), 367 Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness Backcountry camping, Glacier Big Red (Clearmont, WY), 370 (MT), 225–227 National Park (MT), 68 Big Red Gallery (Clearmont, WY), Academic trips, 44–45 Backcountry permits 370 Accommodations, 413–414 Glacier National Park (MT), Big Salmon Lake (MT), 113 best, 8–10 54–56 Big Sheep Creek Canyon (MT), 160 for families with children, 416 Grand Teton (WY), 325 Big Sky (MT), 8, 215–220 Active vacations, 43–52 Yellowstone National Park Big Sky Brewing Company AdventureBus, 45, 269 (MT—WY), 264 (Missoula, MT), 93 Adventure Sports (WY), 309, 334 Backcountry Reservations, 56 Big Sky Candy (Hamilton, MT), 96 Adventure trips, 45–46 Backcountry skiing, 48 Big Sky Golf Course (MT), 217 AdventureWomen, 201–202 Backroads, 45, 46 Big Sky Resort (MT), 216–217 Aerial Fire Depot and Baggs (WY), 390 Big Sky Waterpark (MT), 131 Smokejumper Center (Missoula, Ballooning, Teton Valley (WY), Big Spring (MT), 188 MT), 86–87 306 Big Spring Creek (MT), 187 Air tours Bannack (MT), 167, 171–172 Big Timber Canyon Trail (MT), 222 Glacier National Park (MT), 59 Bannack Days (MT), 172 Biking and mountain biking, 48 the Tetons (WY), 306 Barry’s Landing (WY), 243 Montana Air travel, 409, 410 Bay Books & Prints (Bigfork, MT), Big Sky, 216 Albright Visitor Center 105 Bozeman, 202 (Yellowstone), 263, 275
    [Show full text]
  • South Fork Flathead Watershed Westslope Cutthroat Trout Conservation Program Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    South Fork Flathead Watershed Westslope Cutthroat Trout Conservation Program Draft Environmental Impact Statement Responsible Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (FS) and State of Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (MFWP) Department Title of Proposed Project: South Fork Flathead Watershed Westslope Cutthroat Trout Conservation Program State Involved: Montana Abstract: In cooperation with MFWP, BPA is proposing to implement a conservation program to preserve the genetic purity of the westslope cutthroat trout populations in the South Fork of the Flathead drainage. The South Fork Flathead Watershed Westslope Cutthroat Trout Conservation Program constitutes a portion of the Hungry Horse Mitigation Program. The purpose of the Hungry Horse Mitigation Program is to mitigate for the construction and operation of Hungry Horse Dam through restoring habitat, improving fish passage, protecting and recovering native fish populations, and reestablishing fish harvest opportunities. The target species for the Hungry Horse Mitigation Program are bull trout, westslope cutthroat trout, and mountain whitefish. The program is designed to preserve the genetically pure fluvial and adfluvial westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi) populations in the South Fork drainage of the Flathead River. In order to accomplish the goals, MFWP is proposing to remove hybrid trout from identified lakes in the South Fork Flathead drainage on the Flathead National Forest and replace them with genetically pure native westslope cutthroat trout over the next 10-12 years. Some of these lakes occur within the Bob Marshall Wilderness and Jewel Basin Hiking Area. Currently, 21 lakes and their outflow streams with hybrid populations have been identified and are included in this proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Crown Continent
    THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA OF CROWN THE CONTINENT E – NOTES FALL 2009, NO. 1 Flathead Lake N March 1, 1812, DAVID THOMPSON, famED EXplorER AND FUR tradER, CRESTED A HILL NEAR PRESENT- OdaY POLSON. “WE ALIGHTED ON THE E-Magazine Highlights top OF A BARE KNOWL, commaNDING A VERY Crown Issues, Research The Crown of the Continent—what some extensive view of the lake and coun- basin scoured out by a massive gla- call “The Backbone of the World”—serves try far around,” Thompson wrote cier that inched down the Rocky as a living laboratory for climate change, a when he saw an immense, crystal- Mountain Trench from Canada about stage for urban-wildland interface issues and clear lake stretching north toward 40,000 years ago. About 12,000 a tapestry of human and geographic history. glistening white mountain tops. years ago, the ice reached its maxi- The Crown of the Continent Initiative at the Dense conifer forests dominated mum southern advance, dumping University of Montana launched a biannual the shoreline on both sides of this all matters of rubble and creating, electronic magazine that, like this newsletter, helps to shed light on and bring information, wide body of water. On the east, just south of today’s Polson, what stories and photos from this incredible eco- the slopes rose quickly, culminat- is known in geo-speak as a terminal system. Look for the next issue this winter. ing in jagged snow-covered peaks moraine. thousands of feet above the valley At first sight, the ridge looks like To access the E-Magazine, go online to http:// floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 58 Flathead Forest Plan Amendment 21, Appendix IV Subbasins and Geographic Unit Descriptions
    Appendix 58 Flathead Forest Plan Amendment 21, Appendix IV Subbasins and Geographic Unit Descriptions As part of its planning process, the Flathead National Forest developed the following subbasin and geographic unit descriptions and priorities. The forest is divided into seven “subbasins”: Flathead Lake, lower Flathead, North Fork Flathead, Middle Fork Flathead, South Fork Flathead, Swn, and Stillwater. SWAN SUBBASIN 469,278 acres (all ownerships) 282,462 acres (Flathead National Forest land only) A. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SUBBASIN The Swan Subbasin is bounded by the Swan Range to the east, the Mission Mountains Range to the west, and the Clearwater Divide to the south. This subbasin encompasses the entire Swan River system including Swan Lake. The main valley is roughly 65 miles long and 9 miles wide, narrowing to about one mile in width along Swan Lake. Elevations range from slightly under 3,000 feet to over 9,000 feet. Upper timberline is at approximately 7,000 feet. The subbasin is roughly bisected by the Swan River, which flows generally north to where it enters Flathead Lake. Land ownership in the subbasin is mixed. Approximately 60 percent of the land is managed by the Flathead National Forest (a large part of this is designated or proposed wilderness), 20 percent by Plum Creek Timber Company, 10 by the Swan River State Forest, and 10 percent by other, mainly private, landowners. The communities of Bigfork, Ferndale, Swan Lake, Salmon Prairie, and Condon are located within the subbasin. A large portion of the subbasin is covered with montane and subalpine conifer forests supporting over a dozen species of conifers.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Record Index for the Flathead National Forest 2018 Land Management Plan and NCDE Grizzly Bear Amendments
    Planning Record Index for the Flathead National Forest 2018 Land Management Plan and NCDE Grizzly Bear Amendments Exhibit Author Description 00001 Flathead National Forest Public Involvement List of Meetings September 2013 to May 2015 00002 Chip Weber (forest supervisor, Flathead letter inviting Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes resource managers to meet with Flathead National Forest National Forest) planning team 00003 consultation record of meeting Jan. 21, 2015, with Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes 00004 Meridian Institute Flathead National Forest Plan Revision Middle Fork and South Fork Geographic Area Meeting – Mapping Management Areas Draft Summary 00005 Meridian Institute Flathead National Forest Plan Revision Swan Valley and Salish Mountains Geographic Area Meeting – Mapping Management Areas Draft Summary 00006 Meridian Institute Flathead National Forest Plan Revision Hungry Horse and North Fork Geographic Area Meeting – Mapping Management Areas Draft Summary 00007 Meridian Institute Flathead National Forest Stakeholder Collaboration Forest-Wide Meeting – Mapping Management Areas Draft Summary 00008 Meridian Institute Flathead National Forest Plan Revision - Salish Mountains Geographic Area Meeting Draft Summary 00009 Meridian Institute Flathead National Forest Plan Revision - Swan Valley Geographic Area Meeting Draft Summary 00010 Meridian Institute Flathead National Forest Plan Revision - Hungry Horse, Middle Fork, and South Fork - Geographic Areas Meeting - Draft Summary 00011 Meridian Institute Flathead National
    [Show full text]
  • South Fork Flathead Watershed Westslope Cutthroat Trout Conservation Program
    South Fork Flathead Watershed Westslope Cutthroat Trout Conservation Program Annual Report 2002 DOE/BP-00005043-1 June 2003 Field37: This Document should be cited as follows: Grisak, Grant, Brian Marotz, ''South Fork Flathead Watershed Westslope Cutthroat Trout Conservation Program'', Project No. 1991-01903, 143 electronic pages, (BPA Report DOE/BP-00005043-1) Bonneville Power Administration P.O. Box 3621 Portland, Oregon 97208 This report was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), U.S. Department of Energy, as part of BPA's program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The views in this report are the author's and do not necessarily represent the views of BPA. South Fork Flathead Watershed Westslope Cutthroat Trout Conservation Program Bonneville Power Administration Hungry Horse Dam Mitigation U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Project Number 199101903 Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks State Project 31002/31042 January 2003 Annual Report 2002 South Fork Flathead Watershed Westslope Cutthroat Trout Conservation Program Annual Report 2002 Prepared by Grant Grisak, Project biologist Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks 490 North Meridian Road Kalispell, Mt. 59901 Prepared for Ron Morinaka, Project Manager U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Division of Fish and Wildlife P.O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97208 ii Table of contents Page Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    South Fork Flathead Watershed Westslope Cutthroat Trout Conservation Program Draft Environmental Impact Statement Responsible Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (FS) and State of Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (MFWP) Department Title of Proposed Project: South Fork Flathead Watershed Westslope Cutthroat Trout Conservation Program State Involved: Montana Abstract: In cooperation with MFWP, BPA is proposing to implement a conservation program to preserve the genetic purity of the westslope cutthroat trout populations in the South Fork of the Flathead drainage. The South Fork Flathead Watershed Westslope Cutthroat Trout Conservation Program constitutes a portion of the Hungry Horse Mitigation Program. The purpose of the Hungry Horse Mitigation Program is to mitigate for the construction and operation of Hungry Horse Dam through restoring habitat, improving fish passage, protecting and recovering native fish populations, and reestablishing fish harvest opportunities. The target species for the Hungry Horse Mitigation Program are bull trout, westslope cutthroat trout, and mountain whitefish. The program is designed to preserve the genetically pure fluvial and adfluvial westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi) populations in the South Fork drainage of the Flathead River. In order to accomplish the goals, MFWP is proposing to remove hybrid trout from identified lakes in the South Fork Flathead drainage on the Flathead National Forest and replace them with genetically pure native westslope cutthroat trout over the next 10-12 years. Some of these lakes occur within the Bob Marshall Wilderness and Jewel Basin Hiking Area. Currently, 21 lakes and their outflow streams with hybrid populations have been identified and are included in this proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Land Designations
    WMPZ Forest Plan Revision Scoping Phase Content Analysis Report Category: Special Land Designations Section: Recommended Wilderness and Roadless Area Management PC #: 54 Public Concern: The Forest Service should emphasize protection and management of wilderness and roadless areas. Sample Statement: We commend you on developing a Proposed Action that is concise and easily understood. While we understand that your proposal is very preliminary and general in nature, there are several issues with which we disagree, or on which we believe greater emphasis should be placed. These areas include: proposed wilderness, motorized use, monitoring and enforcement, consistency between forests and the boundaries of the Great Burn proposed wilderness. Consistency. We it is particularly appropriate and necessary that the Lolo National Forest work cooperatively with the Clearwater National Forest to provide consistent management and treatment of, for example, the Great Burn proposed wilderness, parts of which exist on both Forests. Please retain the Lolo's current direction and work with the Clearwater to bring that Forest up to the Lolo's standards. (Preservation/Conservation, Missoula, MT - #439) Sample Statement: I am concerned about the tiny portion of land put into wilderness protection and the high amount of land allowing ATV use. (Individual, Bozeman, MT - #636) Sample Statement: MORE Wilderness! LESS motorized access. MORE habitat for other species, many of whom have been pushed to the limit of our borders by human encroachment on their territory. (Individual, Kalispell, MT - #410) Sample Statement: Every Federal land managing agency in Montana has clear conservation policies for roadless public lands-except the US Forest Service This needs to change.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1 of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Flathead
    United States Department of Agriculture Volume 1—Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Land Management Plan Flathead National Forest Forest Service Northern Region November 2018 “. for the greatest good of the greatest number for the longest time.”—Gifford Pinchot, founding Chief of the Forest Service, 1905 Volume 1—Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Land Management Plan Flathead National Forest Lead agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible official: Chip Weber, Forest Supervisor Flathead National Forest 650 Wolfpack Way Kalispell, MT 59901 406-758-5204 Abstract: This is the first of four volumes of the final environmental impact statement (EIS) that documents analysis of the preferred alternative, two other action alternatives, as well as a no-action alternative for programmatic management of the land and resources administered by the Flathead National Forest. The Forest Service has identified alternative B modified as the preferred alternative. The Flathead National Forest encompasses 2.4 million acres in Flathead, Lake, Lewis and Clark, Lincoln, Missoula, and Powell Counties, Montana. The Forest Service is concurrently amending the forest plans of the Helena-Lewis and Clark, Kootenai, and Lolo National Forests to incorporate habitat management direction for the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (NCDE) grizzly bear population (refer to volume 3 of the final EIS for the evaluation of effects of the amendments). Flathead National Forest photo captions (clockwise from upper left): • South Fork of the Flathead River, Spotted Bear Ranger District • Forwarder working on the Paint Emery Resource Management Project, Hungry Horse– Glacier View Ranger District • Two hikers • Snowmobiler • View from trail to Pentagon Cabin in the Bob Marshall Wilderness (photo by Peter Borgesen) • Fireweed • White-tailed deer (photo by John Littlefield) In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Wildfire Protection Plan for Lake County, Montana
    Community Wildfire Protection Plan For Lake County, Montana January, 2005 Prepared For: Prepared By: Lake County, Montana Arctos Research Jeff Reistroffer, Project Mgr. In Cooperation With P.O. Box 728 Northwest Regional RC&D, Plains, MT 59859 Montana Department of Commerce, and Tel. (406) 826-5171 U.S. Forest Service, National Fire Plan [email protected] LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE..........................................................................................................................1 1.2 GOALS...............................................................................................................................3 1.3 PLAN STRUCTURE...........................................................................................................4 1.4 PLANNING PROCESS......................................................................................................4 CHAPTER 2: LAKE COUNTY CHARACTERISTICS ..............................................................10 2.1 POPULATION ..................................................................................................................10 2.2 LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITIES .....................................................................................10 2.3 LAND COVER..................................................................................................................11 2.4
    [Show full text]