Reforming the Framework for the Economic Regulation of UK Airports

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reforming the Framework for the Economic Regulation of UK Airports Reforming the framework for the economic regulation of UK airports March 2009 The Department for Transport has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the Department’s website in accordance with the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact the Department. Department for Transport Great Minster House 76 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DR Telephone 020 7944 8300 Website www.dft.gov.uk © Crown copyright 2009, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. This publication, excluding logos, may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium for non-commercial research, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The copyright source of the material must be acknowledged and the title of the publication specified. To reproduce maps, contact Ordnance Survey via their website www.ordnancesurvey.gov.uk/ copyright or write to Customer Service Centre, Ordnance Survey, Romsey Road, Southampton SO16 4GU. For any other use of this material, apply for a Click-Use Licence at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/index.htm or e-mail [email protected] To order further copies contact: DfT Publications Tel: 0300 123 1102 E-mail: [email protected] ISBN 978 1 906581 88 6 For a fuller listing of DfT publications, see www.dft.gov.uk/about/dftpubdatabase/ Published by the Department for Transport Printed in Great Britain March 2009 When you have nished with 75% this item please recycle it Contents 1. Executive summary 4 Context to reforming the economic regulation of airports 4 Proposed reforms to the economic regulation of airports 5 Next steps 8 2. Undertaking the Review 10 Introduction 10 Why review the framework for the economic regulation of airports? 10 Evidence considered during the Review 11 Responding to the consultation 13 Structure of the consultation document 14 3. Features of the aviation sector in the UK 16 Introduction 16 Features of the aviation sector 16 Developments in economic regulation 23 Conclusions 24 4. The need for Government or regulatory intervention to address the existence of substantial market power or dominance 25 Introduction 25 Initial conclusions from the DfT’s September 2008 submission to the Competition Commission 26 New evidence and analysis 29 Conclusions on the need to intervene to address market power 43 5. The need for Government or regulatory intervention to address the presence of externalities 45 Introduction 45 Initial conclusions from the DfT’s September 2008 submission to the Competition Commission 46 External impacts of aviation from airport development 48 The CAA and the environment 56 Conclusions on the need for additional environmental provisions to address the environmental impacts of airport development 58 1 Reforming the framework for the economic regulation of UK airports Conclusions on the need to intervene to address the presence of externalities 59 Implications of our conclusions on the need for intervention for the design of an effective regulatory framework for airports 59 6. Statutory remit for the economic regulation of airports 61 Introduction 61 Context for developing proposals for the statutory remit of the economic regulator 61 Proposed statutory remit of the economic regulator 63 Governance 73 Summary of key proposals 73 7. Designing a flexible, fair and effective enforcement regime 74 Introduction 74 Content of licenses 79 Developing the initial licence 84 Changing licence conditions 85 Concurrent competition powers 91 Summary of key proposals 93 8. Enhancing accountability 94 Introduction 94 Mechanisms for appeal of CAA decisions 95 General principles 98 Whether an airport should be regulated under a Tier 1 licence 99 The sunset clause 101 The modification of licence conditions 102 Process for appeals 105 Environmental reporting 106 The Regulators’ Compliance Code 107 CAA annual report and accounts 107 Summary of key proposals 107 9. Aligning airport services with passengers’ needs 108 Introduction 108 Aligning airports’ capital expenditure programmes with user needs 109 Service quality regime 111 Provision of service quality information to passengers 114 Co-ordinating role in the provision of airport services 114 Approach to setting price caps 114 The single and dual till approaches to airport charges 115 Developing and operating competing terminals 116 Promoting financial resilience 117 Conclusions 121 2 Contents 10. Enhancing consumer representation within the aviation sector 122 Introduction 122 Through-airport experience from the perspective of passengers 123 Existing arrangements for independent consumer representation 123 Recent developments in consumer policy within the CAA 124 Reforming consumer representation within the aviation sector 125 Summary of key proposals 128 The Seven Consultation Criteria 129 Annexes 129 Annex 1 – Code of Practice on Consultation 129 Annex 2 – List of consultees 131 Annex 3 – The current regulatory framework 133 Annex 4 – Environmental Law that impacts on airport developments 137 Annex 5 – Aviation and climate change 159 Annex 6 – Questions for Stakeholders 164 3 1. Executive summary 1.1. This consultation seeks views on the UK Government’s proposals to update and change the framework for the economic regulation of the UK airports sector.1 The proposals are intended to provide a flexible economic regulatory framework for the sector that puts the passenger experience at the centre of regulatory decision-making and processes as well as emphasising the environment, financeability, and the principles of Better Regulation. We propose that the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) should regulate fewer airports but be given more powers, with appropriate checks and balances, to further the interests of passengers and adapt the economic regulatory regime to reflect differences across the airports sector and changes over time. 1.2. We will consult later in the year on proposals to take forward key environmental commitments made when Government announced support in principle for the construction of a third runway at Heathrow airport. These will include proposals on a new “green slot” principle and mechanisms to ensure that additional flights at Heathrow can only be allowed when noise and air quality limits at Heathrow are complied with. This subsequent consultation will also set out how the Government intends to implement the recommendations from Sir Joseph Pilling’s strategic review of the CAA. Context to reforming the economic regulation of airports 1.3. Under the Civil Aviation Act 1982 and subsequent Legislation, the CAA regulates in four areas: safety, air space, consumer protection and economic regulation of airports and NATS. In 2008, the Government commissioned two separate, but complementary reviews of the CAA’s role: ●● A strategic review of the CAA’s overall scope, structure and organisation undertaken by Sir Joseph Pilling. This review reported in June 2008. ●● An in-depth review of the economic regulation of airports undertaken by the Department for Transport (DfT), recognising that this aspect of the regulatory regime was set up over 20 years ago and much had changed since it was established. 1 The overarching framework for the economic regulation of airports in Scotland and Wales is a reserved matter with DfT retaining responsibility for policy development. The separate legislation that provides a framework for airport regulation in Northern Ireland currently closely follows that for other parts of the UK and is overseen by the CAA. DfT will work closely with the Devolved Administration in developing policy for Northern Ireland. 4 Executive summary 1.4. It is the conclusions of the review of economic regulation that are set out in this consultation document. However these need to be considered in the context of the former. As the Review’s independent Expert Panel has pointed out, economic regulation cannot be considered in isolation, and the governance arrangements of the CAA can be expected to play an important role in the operation of the regime in practice. The Government has already accepted Sir Joseph Pilling’s recommendations that this legislative framework needs to be brought up to date. Of particular relevance here is his conclusion that the CAA’s general statutory remit does not adequately reflect its responsibility for safeguarding the public interest. The Government is developing proposals for future legislation that will, amongst other things, give the CAA a clear focus on actively pursuing consumer-related and environmental objectives whilst at the same time maintaining the strength of its existing focus on securing a high standard of safety. 1.5. In addition to proposed changes to domestic legislation, airport charges at a number of UK airports are to be subject to new legislation arising from Europe by Spring 2011. An Airport Charges Directive (ACD) has been negotiated by Member States, the Commission and the European Parliament and is expected to become EU law in Spring 2009. The UK, and other Member States, will then have 2 years to implement the Directive’s provisions. The Directive sets a common framework regarding the principles of how airport charges should be established and the associated
Recommended publications
  • AOA-Summer-2015.Pdf
    THE AIRPORT OPERATORTHE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF THE AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSOCIATION DELIVERING A BETTER AIRPORT London Luton Features DELIVERING A A LEAP OF FAITH BETTER LUTON Charlotte Osborn, Chaplain, Chief Executive, Nick Barton Newcastle International SECURITY STANDARDS SMALLER AIRPORTS THE WAY AHEAD The House of Commons Transport Peter Drissell, Director of Select Committee reports SUMMER 2015 Aviation Security, CAA ED ANDERSON Introduction to the Airport Operator THE AIRPORT the proposal that APD be devolved in MARTIJN KOUDIJS PETE COLLINS PETE BARNFIELD MARK GILBERT Scotland. The Scottish Government AIRPORT NEEDS ENGINEERING SYSTEM DESIGN BAGGAGE IT OPERATOR THE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF THE AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSOCIATION has made it clear that it will seek GARY MCWILLIAM ALEC GILBERT COLIN MARNANE SERVICE DELIVERY CUSTOMER SOLUTIONS INSTALLATION to halve the APD rate in Scotland. AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSOCIATION Whilst we welcome reductions in the current eye watering levels of APD, Ed Anderson we absolutely insist on a reduction Chairman anywhere in the UK being matched by Darren Caplan the same reduction everywhere else. Chief Executive We will also be campaigning for the Tim Alderslade Government to incentivise the take up Public Affairs & PR Director of sustainable aviation fuels, which is Roger Koukkoullis an I welcome readers to this, an initiative being promoted by the Operations, Safety & Events Director the second of the new look Sustainable Aviation coalition. This Airport Operator magazine. I has the potential to contribute £480 Peter O’Broin C hope you approve of the new format. million to the UK economy by 2030. Policy Manager Sally Grimes Since the last edition we have of We will also be urging real reductions Events & Member Relations Executive course had a General Election.
    [Show full text]
  • Case M.8923 - AMP CAPITAL / AENA INTERNACIONAL / LUTON AIRPORT
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Competition Case M.8923 - AMP CAPITAL / AENA INTERNACIONAL / LUTON AIRPORT Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/06/2018 In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32018M8923 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 8.6.2018 C(2018) 3782 final PUBLIC VERSION To the notifying parties: Subject: Case M.8923 AMP Capital/Aena Internacional/Luton Airport Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/20041 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 15 May 2018, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertakings AMP Capital Investors (UK) Limited (‘AMP Capital’, the United Kingdom), belonging to the corporate group of AMP Limited (Australia), and Aena Desarrollo Internacional, S.M.E., S.A. (‘Aena Internacional’, Spain), wholly-owned by Aena, itself majority-owned by the Spanish statutory corporation ENAIRE, acquire within the meaning of Articles 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control over London Luton Airport Operations Limited (‘LLAOL’, the United Kingdom), by way of purchase of shares.3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: for AMP Capital: infrastructure investment and management services, including control over Newcastle International Airport and Leeds Bradford Airport in the United Kingdom; for Aena Internacional: management of airport infrastructure; for LLAOL: management and operation of London Luton Airport. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(c) of 1 OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of British Competition Law: a Complete Overhaul and Harmonization
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Lever, Jeremy Working Paper The development of British competition law: a complete overhaul and harmonization WZB Discussion Paper, No. FS IV 99-4 Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Lever, Jeremy (1999) : The development of British competition law: a complete overhaul and harmonization, WZB Discussion Paper, No. FS IV 99-4, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/51159 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu discussion papers FS IV 99 - 4 The Development of British Competition Law: A Complete Overhaul and Harmonization Jeremy Lever March 1999 ISSN Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • NORWICHBOURNEMOUTH 2021/22 Destinationschedule Guide Issue 2
    from NORWICHBOURNEMOUTH 2021/22 DestinationSchedule guide Issue 2 Destination Days of Operation Current schedule Airline Destination Days of Operation Current schedule Airline (from 29 March 2021) (from 29 March 2021) BARBADOS NORWAY Caribbean Fly/Cruise M T W T F S S 04 & 25 Feb 2022 Fjords Fly/Cruise (Bergen) M T W T F S S 26 Feb 2022 CYPRUS POLAND ‡ * ‡ * Paphos M T W T F S S 19 May – 03 Nov 2021 Krakow M T W T F S S Year round from 01 May 2021 04 May – 19 Oct 2022 M T W T F S S 01 June – 30 Oct 2021 PORTUGAL ° ◊ ° ‡ ** Faro M T W T F S S Year round from 03 May 2021 FRANCE Bergerac NEW M T W T F S S 02 June – 27 Oct 2021 SPAIN * ‡ ** ‡ * ‡ ** Alicante M T W T F S S Year round from 03 May 2021 GREEK ISLANDS Girona (Barcelona) M T W **T F S **S 03 May – 30 Oct 2021 Corfu M T W T F S S 17 May – 22 Oct 2021 Gran Canaria M T W T F S S 04 Oct – 25 Apr 2022 02 May – 24 Oct 2022 03 – 31 Oct 2022 Crete (Heraklion) M T W T F S S 06 May – 21 Oct 2022 Ibiza M T W T F S S 05 May – 20 Oct 2022 ^* Kefalonia M T W T F S S 18 May – 14 Sep 2021 Lanzarote M T W T F S S Year round from 20 May 2021 03 May – 13 Sep 2022 * ‡ † ** * ◊ Malaga M T W T F S S Year round from 01 May 2021 M T W T F S 22 May – 23 Oct 2021 * † ** * Rhodes S Majorca M T W T F S S ** 01 May – 30 Oct 2021 07 May – 29 Oct 2022 * ^^ M T * W T F S S * 18 May – 24 Oct 2021 Zante M T W T F S S 23 May – 19 Sep 2021 02 Apr – 23 Oct 2022 01 May – 18 Sep 2022 Menorca M T W T F S S 19 May – 20 Oct 2021 04 May – 19 Oct 2022 ITALY Murcia M T W T F S S 04 Jun – 29 Oct 2021 ‡ ‡ Bergamo (Italian Lakes)
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Analysis of the Economic Case for the Expansion of Leeds Bradford Airport
    SUPPLEMENTARY ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC CASE FOR THE EXPANSION OF LEEDS BRADFORD AIRPORT Findings of independent research FINDINGScommissioned by OF the Group for Action on Leeds Bradford Airport INDEPENDENT ANALYSISNew Economics Foundation Findings of independent analysis commissionedCOMMISSIONED by the Group BY for Action THE on Leeds Bradford Airport GROUP FOR ACTION ON LEEDS BRADFORD Findings of independent research commissionedAIRPORT bySUPPLEMENTA the Group for Action on RYLeeds ANALYSIS Bradford Airport ON THE ECONOMIC CASE FOR Supplementary analysis of the economic case for the expansion of Leeds Bradford Airport SUPPLEMENTARY ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC CASE FOR THE EXPANSION OF LEEDS BRADFORD AIRPORT Findings of independent research commissioned by the Group for Action on Leeds Bradford Airport Published September 2020 Authors: Dr Alex Chapman and Marc Postle Client: Group for Action on Leeds Bradford Airport (GALBA) The consultancy of the New Economics Foundation, NEF Consulting helps put new economics into practice with people and the planet at the heart of decision-making. The New Economics Foundation is the UK’s leading think tank promoting social, economic, and environmental justice to transform the economy so that it works for people and the planet. NEF Consulting Limited New Economics FoundationThe consultancy of the New Economics Foundation, NEF Consulting helps put new economics into practice with people and the planet at the 10 Salamanca Place, London SE1 7HB heart of decision-making. www.nefconsulting.com Tel: 020 7820 6300 The New Economics Foundation is the UK’s leading think tank promoting social, economic, and environmental justice to transform the economy so that it works for people and the planet.
    [Show full text]
  • AOA URGES BUDGET SUPPORT for UK AVIATION and Warns That the Survival of UK Airports Is at Stake
    THE AIRPORT OPERATORTHE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF THE AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSOCIATION AOA URGES BUDGET SUPPORT FOR UK AVIATION and warns that the survival of UK airports is at stake Features LEEDS BRADFORD SOUTHAMPTON AIRPORT Plans for a new £150m terminal tells local council ts future approved in principle depends on a runway extension EIGHT ENGLISH AIRPORTS HOPES RISE FOR SPRING 2021 bid for freeport status Stansted expansion 2 THE AOA IS PLEASED TO WORK WITH ITS CORPORATE PARTNERS, GOLD AND SILVER MEMBERS Corporate Partners Gold Members Silver Members WWW.AOA.ORG.UK 3 KAREN DEE Introduction to The Airport Operator THE AIRPORT All of these moves amount to a Welcome to heartening vote of confidence OPERATOR from the owners of airports that THE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF THE AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSOCIATION this edition of we will recover and be a vibrant, successful sector again. But, while AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSOCIATION The Airport that is really good news for the future, it shouldn’t distract us from The Baroness Ruby Operator the desperate situation that many McGregor-Smith CBE airports find themselves in now after Chair which tells the Government has, in effect, forced Karen Dee the story of them to close down their passenger Chief Executive operations. Henk van Klaveren how UK airports are fighting Head of Public Affairs & PR The Office of National Statistics to survive the worst crisis recently confirmed that air travel has Christopher Snelling that they have ever seen, but suffered more from the pandemic Policy Director than any other sector. The UK Rupinder Pamme also points to some optimism Government’s statement that Policy Manager international travel restrictions will Patricia Page about the future.
    [Show full text]
  • London Southend Airport Traffic Forecasts in Support of Runway Extension Planning Application
    London Southend Airport Traffic Forecasts in support of Runway Extension Planning Application FINAL REPORT April 2009 aviasolutions Terms of Reference and Disclaimer A GE Commercial Aviation Services Partner Terms of Reference Our report (the "Report") has been prepared for London Southend Airport (“LSA”) in accordance with our Letter of Engagement dated 13th February 2009. Furthermore, it is being released to LSA on the basis that it is not to be copied, referred to, disclosed or modified, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of Avia Solutions Limited. The Report cannot be used or relied on by any entity other than LSA unless a written agreement in relation to the terms on which it may be used or relied has been entered into between Avia Solutions Limited and that entity. Any party other than LSA that obtains access to a copy of the Report or the Report itself shall not be entitled to use it or rely on it and Avia Solutions Limited shall have no duty of care or liability in respect of or arising out of the Report to any person or entity other than LSA (and in the case of the latter only in accordance with the Letter of Engagement as aforesaid). Disclaimer of Liability This publication provides general information and should not be used or taken as business, financial, tax, accounting, legal or other advice, or relied upon in substitution for the exercise of your independent judgment. For your specific situation or where otherwise required, expert advice should be sought. Although Avia Solutions Limited or any of its affiliates (together, “Avia”) believes that the information contained in this publication has been obtained from and is based upon sources Avia believes to be reliable, Avia does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed.
    [Show full text]
  • Gibraltar Airport Operators Association
    ISSUE SPONSORED BY ISSUE SPONSORED BY The official magazine of the GIBRALTAR Airport Operators Association AIRPORT: NEW SPRING 2013 TERMINAL TRANSFORMING AIR TRAVEL Policy Features News AOA launches ‘Airport Operators TV’ Bristol Airport’s dynamic development Newcastle Airport launches new website ‘A Fair Tax on Flying’ St Helena’s £201.5m Airport Project RPS: logistical masterplanning at Manchester New night noise regime moves closer LHR Runway Resilience Project Birmingham appoints new aviation strategy specialist Delivering world class integrated baggage handling solutions Babcock provides integrated solutions which support We are one of the UK’s leading organisations providing critical airport operations, helping to keep passengers through-life integrated solutions and support services for moving and fl ights on schedule. Our services airport baggage handling. With over 15 years experience, encompass designing, installing and managing Babcock uses its unrivalled baggage processing and complex baggage handling systems, through to fl eet operational knowledge, together with its specialist management and engineering support for specialist engineering skills in automated handling and control ground support vehicles. systems development, to deliver the optimum throughlife performance in terms of cost, effi ciency and reliability. www.babcock.co.uk babcock-spring2013-1.0.indd 1 27/02/2013 09:54 p.3 WWW.AOA.ORG.UK THE Airport Operator SPRING 2013 Ed Anderson, Chairman, Airport Operators Association The official magazine of the Airport Operators Association CHAIRMAN’S IntRODUctION Airport Operators’ Association 3 Birdcage Walk Welcome to this edition of to ensure that all aspects of London the Airport Operator which the passenger experience are SW1H 9JJ is published on the occasion of excellent and we therefore Tel: 020 7799 3171 Fax: 020 7340 0999 our Annual Dinner at the welcome the appointment of Grosvenor House Hotel.
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT of CASE of BRISTOL AIRPORT ACTION NETWORK (BAAN)
    TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 Appeal by Bristol Airport Limited concerning land at North Side Road, Felton, Bristol, BS48 3DY DEVELOPMENT OF BRISTOL AIRPORT TO ACCOMMODATE 12 MILLION PASSENGERS PER ANNUM Planning Inspectorate Reference: APP/D0121/W/20/3259234 Local Planning Authority Reference: 18/P/5118/OUT Date of Inquiry: July-August 2021 STATEMENT OF CASE of BRISTOL AIRPORT ACTION NETWORK (BAAN) 22 February 2021 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Background 4 3. Planning Policy 5 4. BAAN’s Case: Climate Change 6 5. BAAN’s Case: “Sustainable” Aviation 12 6. BAAN’s Case: Overall 14 7. List of Documents 16 2 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This Statement of Case is submitted by Bristol Airport Action Network Coordinating Committee (“BAAN CC” or “BAAN”), which campaigns for the wellbeing of people and planet in opposing the application by Bristol Airport Limited (”the Appellant”) to expand Bristol Airport. We are a group of campaigners; primarily comprised of members from Extinction Rebellion and other environmental groups in the south-west region, as well as residents from local communities affected by the Appellant’s expansion. 1.2 BAAN was granted Rule 6 status on 11 January 2021. Our aim is to bring to the inquiry, in a co-ordinated and informed way, using evidence from recognised experts, local residents’ concerns about the climate change impact of the proposed development. 3 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 The appeal proposal is described as follows: “Outline planning application (with reserved matters details for some elements included and some elements reserved for subsequent approval) for the development of Bristol Airport to enable a throughput of 12 million terminal passengers in any 12 month calendar period, comprising: 2no.
    [Show full text]
  • DTI Test.Qxp
    Agenda Advancing economics in business Competition as a public policy tool: what is the evidence? A key priority for the government is to increase UK productivity by extending competitive markets. Competition helps drive productivity by acting as a spur to managerial incentives and productive efficiency through ‘natural selection’ of firm entry and exit, and by promoting incentives to innovate. However, as Andrew Rees, Director, Analysis and Research, Consumer and Competition Policy, DTI, and Sasha Maguire, Economist, DTI, explain, recent evidence on these effects is perhaps less well known The UK’s competition framework is generally rated As competition can drive 1 among the best in the world by independent surveys. innovation, so can innovation and The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) is technological advances boost responsible for setting the legislative and regulatory competitive pressure, as has been parameters, with enforcement conducted by two the case in the telecommunications independent competition authorities: the Office of Fair sector Trading (OFT) and the Competition Commission. They are responsible for enforcing the provisions of the UK’s Product markets competition legislation—the Competition Act 1998 and the Enterprise Act 2002—which are intended to promote The UEA study took six markets for case study a pro-competitive climate, and to increase transparency investigation. The case studies were selected where it and independence in competition decisions.2 was thought there would be benefits resulting from interventions by the government or the competition Use of competition as a policy tool is promoted across authorities to enhance competition in those markets and government by a Competition Forum.
    [Show full text]
  • A Competition Regime for Growth: a Consultation on Options for Reform
    A COMPETITION REGIME FOR GROWTH: A CONSULTATION ON OPTIONS FOR REFORM MARCH 2011 Explanation of the wider context for the consultation and what it seeks to achieve The Government’s overarching objective in reforming the UK’s, already world class, competition regime is to maximise the ability of the competition authorities to secure vibrant, competitive markets, in the interests of consumers and to promote productivity, innovation and economic growth. The Government is therefore consulting on changes to: o improve the robustness of decisions and strengthen the regime – enhancing the regime’s ability to resolve and deter the competition restrictions that do most harm to competition, consumers and to economic growth o support the competition authorities in taking forward high impact cases - developing the regime’s ability to target the competition restrictions that do most harm to competition, consumers and to economic growth, and providing the regime with the tools and flexibility to make proportionate and focused interventions o improve speed and predictability for business – building on the regime’s ability to take the timely, proportionate and predictable actions that limit burdens on business and that provide for the certainty that enables business to invest and innovate with confidence In this connection, the Government is consulting on a proposal to merge the competition functions of the Office of Fair Trading and the Competition Commission to create a single Competition and Markets Authority which can play a leading role in achieving the overarching objectives and delivering the desired outcomes. Issued Date: 16 March 2011 Respond by Date: 13 June 2011 Enquiries to Duncan Lawson Department for Business Innovation and Skills 3rd Floor, Orchard 2 1 Victoria Street Westminster London SW1H 0ET Tel: 0207 215 5465 E-mail: [email protected] Fax: 0207 215 0480 This consultation is relevant to: Businesses of all size, economic regulatory bodies, consumer organizations, legal bodies, economic consultants and academics.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Information Act 2000 ('FOIA') Decision Notice
    Reference: FS50600353 Freedom of Information Act 2000 (‘FOIA’) Decision notice Date: 28 January 2016 Public Authority: Manchester City Council Address: Town Hall Albert Square Manchester M60 2LA Decision (including any steps ordered) 1. The complainant has requested information relating to parking enforcement at Manchester Airport, London Stansted Airport, East Midlands Airport and Bournemouth Airport. The Commissioner’s decision is that Manchester City Council does not hold the requested information. While he notes that the information is held by Manchester Airports Group Ltd, he is satisfied that it does not hold the information on behalf of Manchester City Council. The Commissioner does not require the public authority to take any steps to ensure compliance with the legislation. Request and response 2. On 27 July 2015, the complainant wrote to Manchester City Council (‘the council’) and requested information in the following terms: “For clarification I understand that Manchester City Council is a major shareholder in the Manchester Airports Group (see attached), and that this company owns and runs Manchester, London Stansted, East Midlands and Bournemouth Airports. I would like the following information to be provided. 1) A copy of all contracts for parking enforcement that cover the period 1st October 2012 to 30th June 2015 at a) Manchester Airport b) London Stansted Airport 1 Reference: FS50600353 c) East Midlands Airport d) Bournemouth Airport 2) The total number of Parking Charge Notices issued from 1st October 2012 to 30th June 2015 at a) Manchester Airport b) London Stansted Airport c) East Midlands Airport d) Bournemouth Airport 3) The total number of requests made of the DVLA database for registered keeper details for the issuing of Parking Charge Notices for the period 1st October 2012 to 30th June 2015 at, a) Manchester Airport b) London Stansted Airport c) East Midlands Airport d) Bournemouth Airport” 3.
    [Show full text]