Ch 25: History of Life

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ch 25: History of Life 5/10/15 Ch 25: History of Life “There is nothing permanent but change.” (Heraclitus) “Chaos always defeats order because it is better organized.” (Terry Pratchett) Louis Pasteur: Disproving spontaneous generation Universe forms ~13.8 bya Early solar system formation ~ 4.5 bya 1 5/10/15 Earth’s 1st 1 billion years Moon formed by a collision Radiometric Dating Half-lives 14C: 5,730y 40K: 1.25 by 238U: 4.5 by Index fossils 2 5/10/15 Arrhenius & Mojzsis Some of the oldest fossils ~3.4 bya (Strelley Pool, Australia) organic trace fossils http://physicsforme.files.wordpress.com/ ~3.8 bya 2011/08/astrobiology3.jpg Abiogenesis: First step- compounds of life from non-living 1920s AJ Oparin JBS Haldane Miller-Urey experiment (1952/publ 1953) Stanley Miller Harold Urey 10–15% of the carbon now in the form of organic compounds 2% of the carbon had formed amino acids, with glycine the most abundant (all 20 common ones were found) (In 2008, his student J. Bada reexamined some of Fig 4.2 the vials.) 3 5/10/15 proteinoid Protobionts microspheres vesicles 4 5/10/15 Sidney Altman Thomas Cech Other possibilities for early genetic material: PNAs (Miller) Which came first? Where do the materials come from? Earth “panspermia” molecules on space rocks Note: moves some of the origin question off earth but still have the question… 5 5/10/15 Where did life begin? One hypothesis - deep, hot water Early microfossils: stromatolites Shark Bay, Australia (present day) early O2 production Banded Iron Formations 6 5/10/15 O2 production -> ! Sun Ozone (O3) shield protects us from UV ! Ultraviolet rays 3(O2)! ! Upper atmosphere 2(O )! 3 ! Lower atmosphere SBMFig. 20.06! Eukaryotes formation of organelles -> multicellularity endosymbiosis Grypania spiralis (filaments) Lokiarchaeota discovery 2015 http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2015/05/06/new-loki-microbe-is-closest-relative-to- all-complex-life/ 7 5/10/15 How are organisms related? old26.21 Current trees of life (largely based on rRNA) 26.21 Horizontal gene But may not be a transfer (26.23) straightforward tree Ring of life? (old26.23) Snowball Earth 8 5/10/15 Tour: Proterozoic Era: 2.5 bya -> 542 mya Ediacaran fauna Paleozoic Era Cambrian Period 542 -> 488.3 mya all current major animal phyla have appeared Cambrian Period 542 -> 488.3 mya fossil animal embryos Burgess shale 9 5/10/15 Ordovician Period 488.3 -> 443.7 mya first plants? Silurian Period 443.7 -> 416 mya Devonian Period 416 -> 359.2 mya “Age of Fishes” 10 5/10/15 Carboniferous Period 359.2 -> 299 mya (large amounts of forest -> major coal deposits) Permian Period 299 -> 251 mya Mesozoic Era “Age of Reptiles” Triassic Period 251 -> 199.6 mya Jurassic Period 199.6-> 145.5 mya Cretaceous Period 145.5 -> 65.5 mya Fig. 20.13! 11 5/10/15 Cenozoic Era (Age of Mammals, Insects, Birds, Flowering Plants) Paleogene Period Paleocene Epoch 65.5 -> 55.8 mya Eocene Epoch 55.8 -> 33.9 mya Oligocene Epoch 33.9 -> 23 mya Cenozoic Era Neogene Period Miocene Epoch 23 -> 5 mya Pliocene Epoch 5 mya -> 1.8 mya Pleistocene Epoch 1.8 mya -> 10,000 ya Holocene Epoch 10,000 ya -> present? Anthropocene? Land changes: continental plates and plate tectonics 12 5/10/15 “Recent” continental drift Mass extinctions: 5 – 8 events (note: appear different at different taxonomic levels) Q: Is one happening now? Opportunities & changes 13 5/10/15 Development changes can change bodies Timing changes allometric growth Development changes can change bodies Timing changes paedomorphosis axolotl Development changes can change bodies Changes in genes Number of Hox genes How Hox genes are used 14 5/10/15 Evolution does not work toward a snail “goal” limpets eg: mollusk eyes – all useful Nautilus snail squids & octopi Tree of Life video clip with D. Attenborough http://www.wellcometreeoflife.org/video/ Interactive http://www.wellcometreeoflife.org/interactive/ 15 .
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2013.Pdf
    ATOMIC HERITAGE FOUNDATION Preserving & Interpreting Manhattan Project History & Legacy preserving history ANNUAL REPORT 2013 WHY WE SHOULD PRESERVE THE MANHATTAN PROJECT “The factories and bombs that Manhattan Project scientists, engineers, and workers built were physical objects that depended for their operation on physics, chemistry, metallurgy, and other nat- ural sciences, but their social reality - their meaning, if you will - was human, social, political....We preserve what we value of the physical past because it specifically embodies our social past....When we lose parts of our physical past, we lose parts of our common social past as well.” “The new knowledge of nuclear energy has undoubtedly limited national sovereignty and scaled down the destructiveness of war. If that’s not a good enough reason to work for and contribute to the Manhattan Project’s historic preservation, what would be? It’s certainly good enough for me.” ~Richard Rhodes, “Why We Should Preserve the Manhattan Project,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May/June 2006 Photographs clockwise from top: J. Robert Oppenheimer, General Leslie R. Groves pinning an award on Enrico Fermi, Leona Woods Marshall, the Alpha Racetrack at the Y-12 Plant, and the Bethe House on Bathtub Row. Front cover: A Bruggeman Ranch property. Back cover: Bronze statues by Susanne Vertel of J. Robert Oppenheimer and General Leslie Groves at Los Alamos. Table of Contents BOARD MEMBERS & ADVISORY COMMITTEE........3 Cindy Kelly, Dorothy and Clay Per- Letter from the President..........................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Advisory Board September 1, 2006–August 31, 2007
    hoWard hughes medical iNstitute 2007 annual report What’s Next h o W ard hughes medical i 4000 oNes Bridge road chevy chase, marylaNd 20815-6789 www.hhmi.org N stitute 2007 a nn ual report What’s Next Letter from the president 2 The primary purpose and objective of the conversation: wiLLiam r. Lummis 6 Howard Hughes Medical Institute shall be the promotion of human knowledge within the CREDITS thiNkiNg field of the basic sciences (principally the field of like medical research and education) and the a scieNtist 8 effective application thereof for the benefit of mankind. Page 1 Page 25 Page 43 Page 50 seeiNg Illustration by Riccardo Vecchio Südhof: Paul Fetters; Fuchs: Janelia Farm lab: © Photography Neurotoxin (Brunger & Chapman): Page 3 Matthew Septimus; SCNT images: by Brad Feinknopf; First level of Rongsheng Jin and Axel Brunger; iN Bruce Weller Blake Porch and Chris Vargas/HHMI lab building: © Photography by Shadlen: Paul Fetters; Mouse Page 6 Page 26 Brad Feinknopf (Tsai): Li-Huei Tsai; Zoghbi: Agapito NeW Illustration by Riccardo Vecchio Arabidopsis: Laboratory of Joanne Page 44 Sanchez/Baylor College 14 Page 8 Chory; Chory: Courtesy of Salk Janelia Farm guest housing: © Jeff Page 51 Ways Illustration by Riccardo Vecchio Institute Goldberg/Esto; Dudman: Matthew Szostak: Mark Wilson; Evans: Fred Page 10 Page 27 Septimus; Lee: Oliver Wien; Greaves/PR Newswire, © HHMI; Mello: Erika Larsen; Hannon: Zack Rosenthal: Paul Fetters; Students: Leonardo: Paul Fetters; Riddiford: Steitz: Harold Shapiro; Lefkowitz: capacity Seckler/AP, © HHMI; Lowe: Zack Paul Fetters; Map: Reprinted by Paul Fetters; Truman: Paul Fetters Stewart Waller/PR Newswire, Seckler/AP, © HHMI permission from Macmillan Page 46 © HHMI for Page 12 Publishers, Ltd.: Nature vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Protein That Wasn't There: the Discovery of Ribozymes
    The Protein that Wasn't There: The Discovery of Ribozymes Introduction If we were challenged to describe, in layman's terms, what makes living matter different from non-living matter, I suspect that many of us would focus on nucleic acids. Their ability to encode information, to replicate, and their passage from one generation to the next is part and parcel of what makes life special. Ironically, if one examines an organism carefully and observes what makes it "alive," nucleic acids turn out to have very little direct effect on living matter. Whether an animal moves, breathes, digests, turns its head to look, or just blinks an eye, its actions depend far more on enzymes than they do on DNA. Enzymes in muscle produce movement, in nerve cells they open membrane channels that produce message-carrying impulses, throughout the body enzymes produce, store, and convert chemical energy from one form to another. Enzymes are biological catalysts. Enzymes, which lower the activation energies of chemical reaction, are responsible for just about every activity that we associate with living things. Indeed, enzymes even control the synthesis, replication, folding, and activation of DNA itself. What kinds of molecules are there marvelous enzymes? They are proteins, of course. Look at any biology text, high school or college (including pp. 74-76 of Biology by Miller and Levine), and you will find that they devote a generous amount of space (and lots of pictures) to the structure of proteins. They are loaded with terms like a- helix, b- sheet, prosthetic group, secondary structure, and so forth.
    [Show full text]
  • Publish and Flourish Stephen K
    Hope College Digital Commons @ Hope College Faculty Publications 2012 Publish and Flourish Stephen K. Taylor Hope College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.hope.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation Taylor, Stephen K. Publish and Flourish Faculty Publications, 2012. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Hope College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Hope College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 3 Publish and Flourish Copyright 2012 Stephen K. Taylor Ph.D. All Rights Reserved No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, record- ing, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the author. Cover Hope College students working in chemistry laboratories, Courtesy of Hope College. Cover and Interior Design Valerie van Heest Published In the United States of America by Hope College 2012 www.hope.edu 16 15 14 13 12 5 4 3 2 1 First Edition Publisher Cataloging-in-Publication Data Taylor, Stephen K., Ph.D. Publish and flourish: / Stephen K. Taylor, Ph.D. 72 p. : ill., map ; 23 cm. Includes bibliographical references and index (137-142) ISBN 9780963406170 (pbk: alk paper) 1. Education, Higher - Research. 2. College teachers - Research. 3. Academic writing. I. Title II. Author 2012 LB2326.3 .T39 2012 378.0072Tay
    [Show full text]
  • NIH Conflict of Interest Regs Revised
    OCTOBEROCTOBER 2005 www.asbmb.org Constituent Society of FASEB AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY NIH Conflict of Interest Regs Revised SEE PAGE 30 FOR NEW CLARA BENSON TRAVEL FELLOWSHIP AWARD Held in conjunction with EB2006 Custom Antibodies Your Way! Choose the protocol that is right for you! QwikScreen ™: 65 day, 2 rabbit protocol - 4 immunizations, 3 bleeds/rabbit (~100ml serum), customer supplied peptide/protein - Options: Peptide synthesis, immunograde Conjugation to carrier u ELISA u u Animal extensionsMS analysis $685 Standard: 80 day, 2 rabbit protocol - 5 immunizations, 5 bleeds/rabbit (~ 200ml ser Options: um), ELISA, customer supplied peptide/pr Peptide synthesis MS Check™ peptide sequence confirmation u HPLC purified peptide Affinity purification otein - Pinnacle: $975 u HPLC and MS analysis u Complete Affinity Purified Protocol- Animal extensions 2 rabbit pr 5 bleeds/rabbitotocol, (~ 200mlepitope serum), design, peptide PhD technical synthesis support, (up to 20mer),5 immunizations, HPLC purified to ~85%, 5+mg peptide to customer, ELISA, evaluation period, affinity purification, and morMS Check™ peptide sequence confirmationNo Hidden Charges! e… - Discounts for Multiple Protocols$1795 , Includes peptide sequencing by CID MS/MS– u Guaranteed Peptide Let our enthusiasm for scienceExpert workTechnical for SupportFidelity! P: 508.303.8222 www.21stcenturybio.com Toll-free: 877.217.8238 F: 508.303.8333 you! E: [email protected] www.asbmb.org AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OCTOBER
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing RNA Into View: RNA and Its Roles in Biology. INSTITUTION Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, Colorado Springs
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 468 800 SE 064 476 AUTHOR Atkins, John F.; Ellington, Andrew; Friedman, B. Ellen; Gesteland, Raymond F.; Noller, Harry F.; Pasquale, Stephen M.; Storey, Richard D.; Uhlenbeck, Olke C.; Weiner, Alan M. TITLE Bringing RNA into View: RNA and Its Roles in Biology. INSTITUTION Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, Colorado Springs. SPONS AGENCY National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA. PUB DATE 2000-00-00 NOTE 194p. CONTRACT NSF-9652921 AVAILABLE FROM BSCS, Pikes Peak Research Park, 5415 Mark Dabling Blvd., Colorado Springs, CO 80918-3842. Tel: 719-531-5550; Web site: http://www.bscs.org. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Learner (051) Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Science Activities; Biology; *Genetics; Higher Education; *Instructional Materials; *RNA; Science Instruction ABSTRACT This guide presents a module for college students on ribonucleic acid (RNA) and its role in biology. The module aims to integrate the latest research and its findings into college-level biology and provide an opportunity for students to understand biological processes. Four activities are presented: (1) "RNA Structure:- Tapes to Shapes"; (2) "RNA Catalysis"; (3) "RNA and Evolution"; and (4)"RNA Evolution in Health and Disease." (Contains 28 references.) (YDS) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. 00 00 7I- r21 4-1 T COPYAVAILABL U S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS CENTER (ERIC) BEEN GRANTED BY This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization hating it.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Heritage Foundation William S. Knowles
    CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION WILLIAM S. KNOWLES Transcript of an Interview Conducted by Michael A. Grayson at St. Louis, Missouri on 30 January 2008 (With Subsequent Corrections and Additions) This interview has been designated as Free Access. One may view, quote from, cite, or reproduce the oral history with the permission of CHF. Please note: Users citing this interview for purposes of publication are obliged under the terms of the Chemical Heritage Foundation Oral History Program to credit CHF using the format below: William S. Knowles, interview by Michael A. Grayson at St. Louis, Missouri, 30 January 2008 (Philadelphia: Chemical Heritage Foundation, Oral History Transcript # 0406). Chemical Heritage Foundation Oral History Program 315 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 The Chemical Heritage Foundation (CHF) serves the community of the chemical and molecular sciences, and the wider public, by treasuring the past, educating the present, and inspiring the future. CHF maintains a world-class collection of materials that document the history and heritage of the chemical and molecular sciences, technologies, and industries; encourages research in CHF collections; and carries out a program of outreach and interpretation in order to advance an understanding of the role of the chemical and molecular sciences, technologies, and industries in shaping society. WILLIAM S. KNOWLES 1917 Born in Taunton, Massachusetts on 1 June Education 1939 A.B., Harvard University, Chemistry 1942 Ph.D., Columbia University, Steroids Professional Experience Monsanto, Dayton 1942-1944 Chemical Research and Development Monsanto, St. Louis 1944-1951 Organic Division Harvard University 1951-1952 Academic Leave, Total Synthesis of Steroids, R.B. Woodward Monsanto, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Is Not H2O†
    y Water is Not H2O Michael Weisberg ([email protected]) Stanford University 1. Introduction In defending semantic externalism, philosophers of language have often assumed that there is a straightforward connection between scientific kinds and the natural kinds recognized by ordinary language users.1 For example, the claim that water is H2O assumes that the ordinary language kind water corresponds to a chemical kind, which contains all the molecules with molecular formula H2O as its members. This assumption about the coordination between ordinary language kinds and scientific kinds is important for the externalist program, because it is what allows us to discover empirically the extensions of ordinary language kind terms. While I am sympathetic to the semantic externalist project, I think that the discussion of chemical kinds by philosophers of language has been rather badly oversimplified, hiding difficulties that arise when we try to coordinate scientific kinds with the natural kinds recognized by ordinary language users.2 In this paper, I will examine these difficulties by looking more closely at the chemist’s notion of water. To help with this examination, I will begin by making explicit a principle on which I believe semantic externalists rely. The coordina- tion principle is the thesis that scientific kinds and the natural kinds recognized by natural language users line up or can be mapped onto one another one-to-one. A brief examination of an externalist picture of kind reference will show how the coordination principle is relied on. y Many thanks to Peter Godfrey-Smith, Michael Strevens, Anthony Everett, and Deena Skolnick who helped me to clarify the main ideas of this paper tremendously.
    [Show full text]
  • Signature Redacted
    MELVIN CALVIN: NOBEL-WINNING CHEMIST AND SETI SCIENTIST WANNABE By Maria C. Temming B.A. Physics and English Elon University, 2016 SUBMITTED TO THE PROGRAM IN COMPARATIVE MEDIA STUDIES/WRITING IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN SCIENCE WRITING AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2017 @ 2017 Maria C. Temming. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author: Signature redacted Program in Comparative Meq' dies/ Writing X May 22, 2017 redacted__ Certified ________:Signature_ _ _ _ _ ___ by:__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Marcia Bartusiak Prokssor of the Practi , Graduate Program in Science Writing Thesis Advisor Accepted by: Signature redacted Seth Mnookin Director, Graduate Program in Science Writing MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY LIBRARIES ARCHIVES 2 MELVIN CALVIN: NOBEL-WINNING CHEMIST AND SETI SCIENTIST WANNABE By Maria C. Temming Submitted to the Program in Comparative Media Studies/Writing on May 22, 2017 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Science Writing ABSTRACT Melvin Calvin spent more than a decade answering one longstanding question in biochemistry: how did plants use carbon dioxide to manufacture carbohydrates in photosynthesis? This research earned Calvin a Nobel Prize-an honor that catapulted him to international fame, secured him spots on presidential advisory committees, and got him plenty of textbook mentions. But even though Calvin's claim to fame was his work on photosynthesis, his longest- running passion project was investigating the origins of life in the universe.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California, San Diego Annual Financial Report 2009–10
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 2009–10 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 2009–10 1 Chancellor Fox Awarded the NATIONAL MEDAL OF SCIENCE UC SAN DIEGO CHANCELLOR MARYE ANNE FOX received the National Medal of Science in 2010, the highest honor bestowed by the United States government on scientists, engineers, and inventors. A nationally recognized organic chemist and academic leader, Fox has been elected to membership in the National Academy of Sciences and the American Philosophical Society, and to fellowships in the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the American Association for the Advance- ment of Science. She has also received honorary degrees from twelve U.S. institutions. Her research has focused on fundamental principles that were later translated into practical use in solar energy conversion, environmental remediation, and materials science. Fox is the most recent member of the UC San Diego community to receive this prestigious award. Previous living National Medal of Science recipients from UC San Diego are E. Margaret Burbidge, astrophysics (1983); Walter Munk, geophysics (1983); Michael H. Freedman, mathematics (1987); Yuan-Cheng Fung, bioen- gineering (2000); Andrew Viterbi, electrical and computer engineering (2008); and Craig Venter, pharmacology (2009). Clockwise from top: Chancellor Marye Anne Fox; Fox receives the medal from President Barack Obama at the White House, November 17, 2010; an inspirational note Fox wrote as a young girl “I always thought I would be a scientist. Once you’ve understood something that didn’t exist before, it’s almost like you have to figure out what the answer to the next question is, and generate the next question after that.
    [Show full text]
  • B I O T E C H I N T H E S U N S H I N E S T A
    BIOTECH IN THE SUNSHINE STATE December 2009 American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology ASBMB2011 SPECIAL SYMPOSIA CALL FOR PROPOSALS Partner with the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology to bring your community together! ASBMB Special Symposia provides you, as a specialized researcher, a unique opportunity to present cutting-edge science mixed with active networking opportunities in an intimate setting. How We’re Different: Format: Majority of talks selected from abstracts, invited speakers, 2-4 days in length Attendee: 60- 200 attendees, including investigators, industry professionals, graduate and postdoctoral students Venues: Unique locations near natural resources that enable time for outdoor recreation and networking opportunities Funding: ASBMB provides initial funding as well as staff support! Learn More About Special Symposia and Proposal Submission Guidelines at www.asbmb.org/meetings Proposals Due March 1, 2010 ATodayFullPageAd_2011_Proposal Submission2.indd 1 11/23/2009 10:50:10 AM contents DECEMBER 2009 On the cover: ASBMB hopes that your holidays are filled with society news lots of serotonin. 2 Letters to the Editor IMAGE: REBECCA HANNA 20 4 President’s Message 7 Washington Update 8 News from the Hill 11 Member Spotlight 12 Retrospective: Mahlon Hoagland (1921-2009) A retrospective 15 Retrospective: on Mahlon Charles Tanford (1921-2009) Hoagland. 12 2010 annual meeting 18 Nobel Laureate Claims the 2010 Herbert Tabor Lectureship 19 Kinase Researcher Named Recipient of FASEB Award special interest 20 Centerpieces: Burnham Institute Touches Down in Orlando departments 26 Education and Training Regulating 30 Minority Affairs transcriptional activity. 32 BioBits 32 34 Career Insights 36 Lipid News resources Scientific Meeting Calendar podcast summary online only Check out the latest ASBMB podcast, in which Journal of Biological Chemistry Associate Editor James N.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureate Dr. Thomas R. Cech GENERAL LECTURE TECHNICAL
    THE 50th EYRING LECTURE Nobel Laureate Dr. Thomas R. Cech is Distinguished Professor at University of Colorado Boulder, Director at University of Colorado BioFrontiers Institute, and Investigator at Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Dr. Cech was raised and educated in Iowa, earning his B.A. in chemistry from Grinnell College in 1970. He obtained his Ph.D. in chemistry from the University of California, Berkeley, and then engaged in postdoctoral research in the department of biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Massachusetts. In 1978 he joined the faculty of the University of Colorado Boulder, where he became a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator in 1988 and Distinguished Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry in 1990. In 1982 Dr. Cech and his research group announced that an RNA molecule from Tetrahymena, a single-celled pond organism, cut and rejoined chemical bonds in the complete absence of proteins. Thus RNA was not restricted to being a passive carrier of genetic information, but could have an active role in cellular metabolism. This discovery of self-splicing RNA provided the first exception to the long-held belief that biological reactions are always catalyzed by proteins. In addition, it has been heralded as providing a new, plausible scenario for the origin of life; because RNA can be both an information-carrying molecule and a catalyst, perhaps the first self- reproducing system consisted of RNA alone. In January 2000, Dr. Cech moved to Maryland as president of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, which is the nation’s largest private biomedical research organization. In addition, HHMI has an $80 million/year grants program that supports science education at all levels (K-12 through medical school) and international research.
    [Show full text]