DOCSLIB.ORG

LSSIP 2019 - MALTA LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LSSIP 2019 - MALTA LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview EUROCONTROL LSSIP 2019 - MALTA LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2019 for Malta Info Centre Reference 20/01/15/26 Date of Edition 07/04/20 LSSIP Focal Point Roland Camilleri - [email protected] - TM-CAD LSSIP Contact Person Bernd Hill - [email protected] - EUROCONTROL/NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky- implementation-monitoring Reference Documents LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky- implementation-monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master- Edition 2019 plan-implementation-plan-level-3-2019 Master Plan Level 3 – Report https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master- Year 2019 plan-implementation-report-level-3-2019 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP https://www.transport.gov.mt/aviation/air-navigation-services- aerodromes-690 FAB Performance Plan http://www.bluemed.aero/index.php LSSIP Year 2019 Malta- Level 1 Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2019 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2019. LSSIP Year 2019 Malta- Level 1 Released Issue TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................1 Introduction ........................................................................................................7 1. National ATM Environment .............................................................8 1.1. Geographical Scope ............................................................................................ 8 1.2. National Stakeholders ...................................................................................... 10 2. Traffic and Capacity....................................................................... 18 2.1. Evolution of traffic in Malta .............................................................................. 18 2.2. MALTA ACC ....................................................................................................... 19 3. Implementation Projects ............................................................... 22 3.1. National projects .............................................................................................. 22 3.2. FAB projects ...................................................................................................... 24 3.3. Multinational projects ...................................................................................... 26 4. Cooperation activities ................................................................... 27 4.1. FAB Co-ordination ............................................................................................ 27 4.2. Multinational cooperation initiatives ............................................................... 29 5. Implementation Objectives Progress ............................................ 30 5.1. State View: Overall Objective Implementation Progress ................................. 30 5.2. Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature ...................................................... 31 5.3. ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress .............................................................. 34 5.4. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress................................................. 35 6. Annexes ........................................................................................ 55 A. Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Malta ............. 55 B. National stakeholders organisation charts....................................................... 56 C. Implementation Objectives’ links with SESAR KF, ASBU blocks and more ...... 60 D. SESAR Solutions implemented in a voluntary way ........................................... 64 E. Military Organisations Infrastructure ............................................................... 71 F. Glossary of abbreviations ................................................................................. 72 LSSIP Year 2019 Malta- Level 1 Released Issue Executive Summary National ATM Context Member State of: The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Malta are the following: - Ministry for Transport, Infrastructure and Capital Projects (MTIP) - Ministry for Tourism & Consumer Protection (MTCP) - Authority for Transport in Malta - Civil Aviation Directorate (TM-CAD) - Bureau of Air Accident Investigation (BAAI) - Malta Air Traffic Services Ltd (MATS) - Malta International Airport plc (MIA) - Malta International Airport – (METOFFICE) Main airport covered by LSSIP: Malta International Airport (LMML) LSSIP Year 2019 Malta- Level 1 1 Released Issue Traffic and Capacity Summer Forecast (May to October inclusive) 2.3 % & 6.1% +4.5% 2019 2019 2020-2024 For MALTA ACC the average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in summer 2019. Malta is part of: The BLUE MED FAB Number of national projects: 9 Number of FAB projects: 8 Number of multinational projects: 2 Summary of 2019 developments: In the years 2018 to 2019, Free Route Airspace (AOM21.2), Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring (ATC12.1) and Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions (SAF11) were deployed. For the year 2020, Objectives for New Pan-European Network Service (COM12), Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (INF07), Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes (ITY-COTR), Migrate from AFTN to AMHS (COM10), Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information (ITY-ADQ), Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer (ATC17) and Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (ITY-FMTP) are planned by MATS to be deployed. LSSIP Year 2019 Malta- Level 1 2 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline (Pre-SESAR and SESAR1 non-PCP) and the PCP elements. It shows the average implementation progress for all objectives grouped by SESAR Phases, excluding those for which the State is outside the applicability area as defined on a yearly basis in the European ATM Master Plan (Level 3) 2019, i.e. disregarding the declared “NOT APPLICABLE” LSSIP progress status. The SESAR 1 (non-PCP) progress in the graphics below for this State is based on the following objectives: AOP15, AOP16, AOP17, AOP18 and ATC02.9. Pre-SESAR Phase 2000 2030 74% SESAR 1 (PCP only) 2013 2024 36% SESAR 1 (non-PCP) 2013 2030 14% LSSIP Year 2019 Malta- Level 1 3 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. Optimised ATM Network Advanced Air Traffic High Performing Airport Enabling the Aviation Services Services Operations Infrastructure 100 0 % n/a n/a 0 % 0 % 84 88 % % % 60 58 % 50 % % 34 % PCP) PCP) PCP) PCP) - - - - SESAR Phase SESAR Phase SESAR Phase SESAR Phase - - - - Pre Pre Pre Pre SESAR 1 (non SESAR 1 (non SESAR 1 (non SESAR 1 (non SESAR SESAR 1 (PCP only) (PCP 1 SESAR only) (PCP 1 SESAR only) (PCP 1 SESAR only) (PCP 1 SESAR ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Block 0. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 5.3 – ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress. Block 0 2000 2024 86% LSSIP Year 2019 Malta- Level 1 4 Released Issue ATM Deployment Outlook State Objectives Deployed in 2018 - 2019 - Free Route Airspace AOM21.2 - 100 % progress - Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring ATC12.1 - 100 % progress - Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions SAF11 – 100% By 2020 By 2021 By 2022 By 2023+ - New Pan-European - RNP Approach Procedures - 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Network Service (NewPENS) to instrument RWY Channel Spacing below FL195 COM12 - 38 % progress NAV10 - 85 % progress ITY-AGVCS2 - 79 % progress - Electronic Terrain and - Aircraft Identification - Information Exchanges Obstacle Data (eTOD) ITY-ACID - 45 % progress using the SWIM Yellow TI INF07 - 03 % progress - Initial ATC Air-Ground Data Profile - Implementation of ground- Link Services INF08.1 - 00 % progress ground automated co- ITY-AGDL - 37 % progress ordination processes - RNAV 1 in TMA Operations ITY-COTR - 93 % progress NAV03.1 - 48 % progress - Migrate from AFTN to - Implement enhanced AMHS tactical flow management COM10 - 72 % progress services - Ensure Quality of FCM01 - 67 % progress Aeronautical Data and - Interactive Rolling NOP Aeronautical Information FCM05 - 00 % progress ITY-ADQ - 55 % progress - Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer ATC17 - 90 % progress - Common Flight Message Transfer
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report of the Secretary-General, Implementation of Resolution 2437
    United Nations S/2019/711 Security Council Distr.: General 5 September 2019 Original: English Implementation of resolution 2437 (2018) Report of the Secretary-General I. Introduction 1. The present report is submitted pursuant to paragraph 3 of Security Council resolution 2437 (2018), in which the Council renewed its request to me to report on the implementation of resolution 2240 (2015), in particular the implementation of paragraphs 7 to 10 of that resolution. 2. The report covers developments since my previous report of 31 August 2018 (S/2018/807) until 31 August 2019. The information and observations herein are based on submissions by Member States, relevant international and regional bodies and United Nations entities. II. Smuggling of migrants and trafficking in persons in the Mediterranean Sea off the coast of Libya 3. Since the issuance of my previous report, the world continues to face the grim reality that the Mediterranean Sea remains a high-volume thoroughfare for the smuggling of and trafficking in refugees and migrants. In 2019, thousands have again perished or gone missing en route or have been returned to situations of grave harm and uncertainty. In the period from 1 September 2018 to 31 July 2019, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) recorded a total of 82,236 arrivals of refugees and migrants by sea in Europe, a 26 per cent decrease from the same period in 2018, when approximately 111,200 individuals were recorded to have arrived in Europe by sea. For the period from September 2018 to July 2019, 1,485 refugees and migrants were recorded to have died or gone missing at sea on all the Mediterranean routes, including 736 on the so-called central Mediterranean route from North Africa to Italy and Malta.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Way Towards a European Defence Union - a White Book As a First Step
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT STUDY On the way towards a European Defence Union - A White Book as a first step ABSTRACT This study proposes a process, framed in the Lisbon Treaty, for the EU to produce a White Book (WB) on European defence. Based on document reviews and expert interviewing, this study details the core elements of a future EU Defence White Book: strategic objectives, necessary capabilities development, specific programs and measures aimed at achieving the improved capabilities, and the process and drafting team of a future European WB. The study synthesizes concrete proposals for each European institution, chief among which is calling on the European Council to entrust the High Representative with the drafting of the White Book. EP/EXPO/B/SEDE/2015/03 EN April 2016 - PE 535.011 © European Union, 2016 Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies This paper was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Sub-Committee on Security and Defence. English-language manuscript was completed on 18 April 2016. Translated into FR/ DE. Printed in Belgium. Author(s): Prof. Dr. Javier SOLANA, President, ESADE Center for Global Economy and Geopolitics, Spain Prof. Dr. Angel SAZ-CARRANZA, Director, ESADE Center for Global Economy and Geopolitics, Spain María GARCÍA CASAS, Research Assistant, ESADE Center for Global Economy and Geopolitics, Spain Jose Francisco ESTÉBANEZ GÓMEZ, Research Assistant, ESADE Center for Global Economy and Geopolitics, Spain Official Responsible: Wanda TROSZCZYNSKA-VAN GENDEREN, Jérôme LEGRAND Editorial Assistants: Elina STERGATOU, Ifigeneia ZAMPA Feedback of all kind is welcome. Please write to: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Sheet
    TACTICALL NAVY REFERENCES Internal Communication External Communication TactiCall gives you complete control and fast access to all net- TactiCall is a perfect match for Task- or coalition force operations, works on board your vessel. Be it Functional Nets including teleph- including other military arms. SOF teams, air force, marine detach- ony, public address, entertainment systems and the like or Fighting ments and even civil and NGO agencies can be important players Nets handling alarms, broadcasts and orders, weapon teams or in the operation. More often than not, this setup includes a multi- mission control. tude of different frequency bands, networks and radio equipment. TactiCall will integrate all these into one simple and easy to use TactiCall is highly flexible and scalable, it is platform independent solution that permits everybody to reach each other regardless of and will integrate seamlessly into your combat management sys- equipment and technology used. tem of choice. In other words TactiCall lets you control all internal communication on board your vessel and with features such as TactiCall will allow key features for modern day operations like red/ record and playback helps you log and later analyze your commu- black separation, multi-level security operations, global public ad- nication flows. dress and allowing government or task force commanders to com- municate directly with whoever needs to be addressed in a given situation - facilitating a much smoother and more rapid “Statement of No Objections” chain. Contact Porten
    [Show full text]
  • IMLI VISITING FELLOWS Academic Year 2019 – 2020
    IMLI VISITING FELLOWS Academic year 2019 – 2020 Mr. C. Abela (Malta, Senior Project Officer for International Relations, European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA)) Prof. I. Arroyo (Spain, Father of Modern Spanish Maritime Law) Prof. A. Blanco-Bazan (Argentina, International Lawyer & Consultant) Mr. L. Barchue (Liberia, Assistant Secretary-General/Director, Department for Member State Audit and Implementation Support, International Maritime Organization (IMO)) Prof. C. J. Cheng (China, Secretary-General, Xiamen Academy of International Law) Dr. A. Fenech (Malta, Vice-President of the Comité Maritime International (CMI)) Prof. M. Fitzmaurice (Poland, Queen Mary University of London) Ms. G. Grant (Canada, Alternative Representative of Canada to the International Maritime Organization (IMO)) Mr. M. Ghorbel (Tunisia, Technical Officer of Maritime Safety Division, International Maritime Organization (IMO)) Dr. P. J. S. Griggs CBE (UK, Former President, Comité Maritime International (CMI)) Dr. A. Henriksen (Germany, Lawyer and Certified Specialist in Commercial and Corporate Law) Dr. X. Hinrichs (Germany, Registrar, International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS)) Dr. J. Hoffmann (Germany, Chief, Trade Logistics Branch Division on Technology and Logistics, UNCTAD) Dr. Y. Ishii (Japan, Associate Professor, National Defence Academy of Japan) Prof. A. Kanehara (Japan, Professor, Faculty of Law, Sophia University, Member of IMLI Governing Board) Mr. N. Kanehara (Japan, Former Deputy Secretary-General, National Security Secretariat of the Prime Minister’s Office) Mr. F. Kenney (USA, Director, Legal Affairs and External Relations Division, International Maritime Organization (IMO)) Ms. S. Kuma (Japan, Executive Director, Yokohama-Kawasaki International Port) 1 Mr. A. Kennedy (UK, Global Head of Dispute Resolution and Compliance, Lloyd’s Register) Mrs. K.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration Crisis in the EU: Developing a Framework for Analysis of National Security and Defence Strategies João Estevens
    Estevens Comparative Migration Studies (2018) 6:28 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0093-3 ORIGINALARTICLE Open Access Migration crisis in the EU: developing a framework for analysis of national security and defence strategies João Estevens Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Portuguese Institute of International ’ Relations, Nova University of Lisbon, This article addresses migration-security nexus in the EU by assessing Member States Lisbon, Portugal national security and defence strategies as well as the 2016 EUGS in a time of migration crisis, a crisis that stands as one of the most important geopolitical challenges today in the EU. After developing and applying a framework for analysis derived from a literature review, the existing differences among Member States are clear in terms of strategic cultures and approaches to migration issues. The idea of ‘EU’rope without internal borders is at stake as Schengen is under serious attack due to increasing Eurocentrism and growing extreme right-wing populism, which are a consequence of increasing economic protectionism and international terrorism. The solution seems to depend on two critical uncertainties: the evolution of political and social instability in the North Africa and the Middle East, and the future of the EU itself. The results enlighten a securitization of migration mostly centred on the nation-state and national security rather than on people and human security. Keywords: Migration-security nexus, Migration crisis, Security and defence strategies, Comparative research, EUGS Introduction The twenty-first century is the century of the migrant, being global mobility a highly stratified phenomenon, from the global tourist to the undocumented employee, and from human trafficking to refugees forced to leave their country of origin because of climate changes, poverty or wars (Castles & Miller, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Volume I Section IV-III - Europe
    Volume I Section IV-III - Europe Armenia CTFP - Fiscal Year 2012 Department of Defense Training Course Title Qty Training Location Student's Unit US Unit - US Qty Total Cost Start Date End Date Combating Terrorism Language Program (CTLP) 1 MARSHALL CENTER MoD MARSHALL CENTER $8,250 1/6/2012 2/9/2012 Combating Terrorism Language Program (CTLP) 12-01 1 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany Ministry of Defense MC $8,706 1/6/2012 2/9/2012 NESA Executive Seminar 02-12 1 Washington, DC, United States Ministry of Defense NESA $10,560 4/24/2012 5/8/2012 Program in Advanced Security Studies (PASS) 12-05 1 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany National Assembly MC $11,291 3/23/2012 5/31/2012 Territories and population Protection Program in Advanced Security Studies (PASS) 12-05 1 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany MC $11,275 3/23/2012 5/31/2012 Department Program on Terrorism and Security Studies 1 MARSHALL CENTER MoD MARSHALL CENTER $10,100 2/10/2012 3/16/2012 Program on Terrorism and Security Studies (PTSS) 12-03 1 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany Ministry of Defense MC $9,430 2/10/2012 3/16/2012 Senior Executive Seminar (SES) 1 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany Ministry of Foreign Affairs MC $5,180 9/5/2012 9/13/2012 Senior Executive Seminar (SES) 1 MARSHALL CENTER Ministry of Foreign Affairs MARSHALL CENTER $3,950 9/5/2012 9/13/2012 Tampa Florida (JSOU - Joint Spec Ops Special OPS Combating Terrorism 1 DMCDJSFLTA Intelligence Department of General Staff $11,484 5/7/2012 5/18/2012 University) Tampa Florida (JSOU - Joint Spec Ops Special OPS Combating Terrorism
    [Show full text]
  • Armed Forces of Malta
    Armed Forces of Malta Revision date: 1 March 2017 © 2010-2017 Ary Boender & Utility DXers Forum – UDXF www.udxf.nl The Armed Forces of Malta (AFM) includes land, maritime and sea components. AFM’s Headquarters is located at Luqa Barracks, Luqa. There are three land units, an air wing and a maritime squadron. The AFM also have a Reserve and an Emergency Volunteer Reserve Force. UNITS - 1st Regiment, is an infantry battalion and is based at Lyster Barracks, Hal Far. - 3rd Regiment has a combat support role and operates from Safi Barracks, Safi. - 4th Regiment acts in the combat service support role is located in Luqa Barracks. - The Maritime Squadron provides the maritime component of the AFM and operates from Hay Wharf Base in Floriana. - The Air Wing is the air component of the AFM and is based in the military zone of the Malta International Airport. MARITIME SQUADRON The AFM Maritime Squadron has its HQ at Hay Wharf Base in Floriana. The Squadron has defence tasks and is also responsible for Search & Rescue operations at sea. There are five Commands at the Maritime Squadron: - Headquarters (base security, supply, procurement, transportation) - Offshore Command (4 patrol boats) - Inshore Command (4 patrol boats, 2 SAR vessels, Special Boat Unit) - G Command (swift response unit on the island of Gozo) - Support Command (equipment and supply management) VESSELS Search & Rescue vessels Melita I, Melita II Interceptor vessels P02, P03, P04 Response boats P05, P06 Inshore patrol boats P21, P22, P23, P24 Offshore patrol boats P51, P52, P61,
    [Show full text]
  • The AFM's Defence Estate.Pdf
    Upon taking over Malta as its operational base in the Mediterranean, the British administration wasted no time in commissioning the construction of new military infrastructure which has resulted in numerous fine examples of impressive British military architecture spanning over two decades, in fact the Armed forces of Malta's defence estate is a result of this intriguing legacy. This article delves into the history of the main locations where units of the land component of the Armed Forces of Malta are based, namely Fort Mosta, Major John Stroud Fort Madliena, Luqa, Lyster, Safi and Pembroke Barracks. Staff Officer 2 Strategy and Forward Planning, Headquarters AFM loading guns were emplaced. With the The Fort's primary function was to serve as a decommissioning of the Victoria lines Fort main coastal defensive position and had guns Mosta did not retain its strategic importance emplaced which had an effective range of art Mosta serves as the base of the as a main defensive strong point, and was about 8000 yards. Although the Victoria Lines Ammunition & Explosives, Storage & subsequently transformed into an ammunition defensive concept was decommissioned by FDisposal Squadron of the 3rd Regiment depot by the British, without a doubt its 1907, Fort Madliena, remained in use and it AFM it is also utilised as an ammunition location on a ridgeline which naturally makes was transformed into a communications post depot. It was built between 1878 and the the larger part of the Fort rather impregnable for the Royal Air Force, and then as a radar 1880s by the British as part of a major contributed to such a use.
    [Show full text]
  • Maltese Military Personnel and to Increase Malta’S Search and Rescue Cover Over the Central Mediterranean Sea
    The Armed Forces of Malta and Military Doctrine Introduction Although Malta today does not face any direct military threats to her territorial integrity and interests, she maintains a defence force designated as the 'Armed Forces of Malta'. Its primary function is to safeguard national sovereignty and interests both in peacetime and in crises. Malta does not have a navy, air force or coastguard but her armed forces are equipped with a maritime and air component as an integral part of this joint Force. At full establishment the strength of the Armed Forces of Malta (including the air and sea component) is equivalent to approximately one composite brigade. The Armed Forces also have an Emergency Volunteer Reserve Force. Command, Control and Administration of the Armed Forces of Malta 1. The Malta Armed Forces Act was passed through Parliament in 1970. It enables the Head of State to raise, maintain and regulate an armed force. This act also empowers the President of Malta as Head of State, to delegate the command and authority vested in him to the democratically elected Government, exercisable by the Minister for Defence and answerable to Parliament. The Prime Minister of Malta retains Defence Matters within his portfolio. 2. A Defence Matters Directorate in the Office of the Prime Minister provides objective, technical and policy advice as well as timely analysis on all aspects of military matters affecting the Government’s Defence Policy. 3. Military command of the Armed Forces of Malta is exercised by the Commander, who is of Brigadier rank. He is supported by a Headquarters that is responsible for the command, control and management of the Force.
    [Show full text]
  • As the Fiction of a Libyan Search and Rescue Zone Begins to Crumble, EU States Use the Coronavirus Pande
    Analysis Mediterranean: As the fiction of a Libyan search and rescue zone begins to crumble, EU states use the coronavirus pandemic to declare themselves unsafe Yasha Maccanico May 2020 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 2 Submission to the IMO in London ......................................................................................... 2 Point by point ........................................................................................................................ 3 Italy declares itself unsafe by inter-ministerial decree… ........................................................ 4 … and Malta and Libya follow suit as they enact refoulements ............................................. 7 Frontex and Libya ............................................................................................................... 10 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 11 Postscript: Maltese official admits coordinating rescue and return to Libya ......................... 12 Mediterranean: EU states use the coronavirus pandemic to declare themselves unsafe www.statewatch.org | 1 Introduction The search and rescue zone assigned to Libya in the central Mediterranean has been obvious since its inception as a fiction that was useful to assert EU efforts to reduce the number of arrivals by sea. Shortly after a submission to the International Maritime
    [Show full text]
  • WGA2020 Malta Report
    An EU Survey on Whole-of- Goverment Approaches to WGA External Conflict and Crisis This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s EU Survey on Whole-of-Government Approaches to External Conflict and Crises (WGA) 2020. More on the WGA at https://www.wga-project.eu. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, WGA 2020 Country Report — Malta. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2020. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Malta Report Roderick Pace 1 | Introduction Malta has not developed a whole-of-government approach (WGA) regarding external conflicts and crises, and there are several likely reasons for this. The first is that the concept is new in the sense that, until recently, international crises have been seen as falling almost exclusively in the domain of foreign affairs, with the result that they were primarily handled by diplomatic bodies. During its entire post-independence period, Malta was mainly preoccupied with its own security and building its statehood. Malta’s small size, its population of less than half a million (Eurostat 2019), its limited resources and its policy of neutrality and non-alignment during the Cold War further accentuated this approach of standing on the sidelines, so to speak. However, since becoming an EU member state, new opportunities have arisen for Malta to participate in regional and global efforts. Historically, it has tended to become more involved (though to varying degrees) in crises occurring in the Mediterranean region and whose consequences have a direct impact on its security and well-being. An example of this was Malta’s role during the 2011 civil war in Libya.
    [Show full text]
  • Malta and the European Union's Common Security and Defence Policy
    Malta and the European Union’s Common Security and Defence Policy: Challenges and Opportunities Duncan Vella A dissertation in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Master of Arts in Public Policy Department of Public Policy under the Faculty of Economics, Management and Accountancy June 2015 University of Malta Library – Electronic Thesis & Dissertations (ETD) Repository The copyright of this thesis/dissertation belongs to the author. The author’s rights in respect of this work are as defined by the Copyright Act (Chapter 415) of the Laws of Malta or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this full-text thesis/dissertation and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Act provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The ever increasing global challenges and threats faced by the European Union (EU) today are posing pressures on the same Union to think globally and act locally. In response to this new security context, the EU evolved its security and political dimensions. One of the tools set forth was the creation of the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) in 1999 which since then has evolved rapidly. Malta’s accession in the European Union (EU) in 2004 meant that it had to partake in this policy framework and in virtue of this, the country’s foreign and security policy traditions had to conform to this new reality. Hence, with reference to the Meta theory of Europeanisation and following a set of interviews with key officials, this study initially uncovers how this policy domain has influenced Malta’s foreign and security policy matters and brought about adaptations at the domestic level, new ways of projecting national priorities within the EU as well as the identity reconstruction of national actors.
    [Show full text]