DOCSLIB.ORG

Greece/The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia IPA Cross-Border Programme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Greece/The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia IPA Cross-Border Programme Greece/the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia IPA Cross-Border Programme Greece – the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia IPA Cross-Border Programme 2007-2013 CCI : 2007 CB 16 I PO 009 OCTOBER 2011 0 Greece/the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia IPA Cross-Border Programme Glossary of Acronyms Acronym Description CBC Cross-Border Co-operation CC Candidate Countries ERDF European Regional Development Fund IPA Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance NP Neighbourhood Programme PCC Potential Candidate Countries ICT Information and Communication Technologies WLAN Wireless Local Area Networks NUTS Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization PHARE Poland, Hungary, Assistance for Restructuring their Economies ISPA Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-Accession SAPARD Special Accession Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development IUCN International Union for the Conservation of Nature 1 Greece/the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia IPA Cross-Border Programme Table of Contents Legal Basis ............................................................................................................................. 6 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 7 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 The Greece/the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia IPA Cross-Border Programme .... 10 1.2 Eligible Areas ............................................................................................................... 11 1.3 The Programming Process ............................................................................................ 14 2 Analysis of the socio-economic environment ........................................................................ 17 2.1 Demography and spatial patterns .................................................................................. 17 2.2 Geography and Environment ........................................................................................ 19 2.3 Economy ..................................................................................................................... 23 2.4 Education and R&D ...................................................................................................... 28 2.5 Accessibility ................................................................................................................. 30 2.6 Health and Social Protection ......................................................................................... 32 2.7 Culture ........................................................................................................................ 32 2.8 Administration and planning capacity ............................................................................ 33 2.9 Lessons learnt in the former programming periods ......................................................... 34 3 SWOT Analysis ................................................................................................................... 36 4 Programme Strategy .......................................................................................................... 39 4.1 Strategy Framework ..................................................................................................... 39 4.2 Application of EU principles ........................................................................................ 40 4.3 Objectives and Priorities ............................................................................................... 41 4.4 Financial allocation per priority...................................................................................... 45 4.5 Quantification of objectives ........................................................................................ 45 4.6 Compliance and complementarity with other policies and programmes ............................ 47 4.7 Bilateral Co-operation and Agreements between Greece and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia ..................................................................................................................... 55 2 Greece/the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia IPA Cross-Border Programme 4.8 Main findings of Ex-ante Evaluation and Strategic Environmental Assessment .................. 57 4.8.1 Main findings of the Ex-ante Evaluation .............................................................. 57 4.8.2 Main findings of the Strategic Environmental Assessment .................................... 58 4.8.2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 58 4.8.2.2 The Community’s Strategic Framework - The Directive 2001/42 ............................. 58 4.8.2.3 National Legislative framework ............................................................................ 60 4.8.2.4 Environmental objectives ..................................................................................... 65 4.8.2.4.1 The Gothenburg Strategy on Sustainable Development ...................................... 65 4.8.2.4.2 6th Environment Action Programme .................................................................. 66 4.8.2.5 Priority Axes ....................................................................................................... 67 4.8.2.6 Conclusions from the Greece – the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Programme Analysis ....................................................................................................... 67 4.8.2.7. Alternative possibilities for the programme implementation .................................. 68 4.8.2.8 Existing Environment Situation ............................................................................. 70 4.8.2.8.1 Geography and Morphology .............................................................................. 70 4.8.2.8.2 Protected Sites ................................................................................................. 72 4.8.2.8.3 Population - Demographic elements .................................................................. 75 4.8.2.8.4 Economic structure .......................................................................................... 77 4.8.2.8.5 Economy - Production ...................................................................................... 78 4.8.2.8.6 Infrastructure .................................................................................................. 79 4.8.2.9 Assessment and Evaluation of the Programme’s Impacts ....................................... 82 4.8.2.10. Measures to mitigate environmental impacts ...................................................... 85 4.8.2.11 Environmental Monitoring System ...................................................................... 88 5 Priorities and Measures ....................................................................................................... 90 5.1 Priority 1: “Enhancement of cross-border economic development” .................................. 90 5.2 Priority 2: “Enhance the environmental resources and cultural heritage of the programme area” ................................................................................................................................ 93 3 Greece/the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia IPA Cross-Border Programme 5.3 Priority 3: Technical Assistance ..................................................................................... 95 6 Publicity and Visibility ......................................................................................................... 96 7 Financial Tables ................................................................................................................. 97 7.1 Annual commitment in the programme .......................................................................... 97 7.2 Indicative breakdown by priority axes and by year ......................................................... 98 8 Implementing provisions ................................................................................................... 101 8.1 introduction ............................................................................................................... 101 8.2 Managing Authority .................................................................................................... 101 8.3 Certifying Authority .................................................................................................... 103 8.4 Audit Authority........................................................................................................... 104 8.5 Joint Technical Secretariat .......................................................................................... 107 8.6 Intermediate Body ..................................................................................................... 110 8.7 National IPA Coordinator ............................................................................................ 110 8.8.National Authorising Officer ........................................................................................ 110 8.9 Operating Structure ................................................................................................... 112 8.10 Audit Authority (responsible for the report and opinion for the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • No Rth Ern G Reece Factsh
    NORTHERN GREECE – THESSALONIKI FACTSHEET 1 – 30 November 2016 HIGHLIGHTS OF THE MONTH 3,223 160 6,405 62,826 Accommodation places with Accommodation places for Asylum-seekers transported Non-food items distributed services for relocation unaccompanied children by UNHCR from northern, by UNHCR in northern candidates/other vulnerable established by UNHCR in central and western Greece Greece as part of the asylum-seekers established northern Greece by the end to Regional Asylum offices, winterization plans in by UNHCR in northern of November embassies, medical facilities October (51,884) and Greece by the end of and cultural events in November (10,942) November November 314 76 13 112 Prefabricated houses Water and Sanitation Inter-agency coordination National (87) and installed in Nea Kavala, facilities (shower and toilet sectoral working groups international (25) staff Alexandria and Lagadikia containers) installed / established and chaired/co- deployed to UNHCR Sub- sites by UNHCR as part of maintained by UNHCR in chaired by UNHCR in Office Thessaloniki the winterization plans by northern Greece in northern Greece the end of November November FACTSHEET NORTHERN GREECE 1 UNHCR Factsheet – NORTHERN GREECE-THESSALONIKI – 1-30 November 2016 OPERATIONAL CONTEXT ¡ UNHCR is active, through a variety of interventions, in 22 sites in northern Greece (Macedonia, Thrace, Epirus and Thessaly regions) hosting some 12,000 asylum-seekers, the largest concentration in Greece. As requested by the Greek authorities, UNHCR is providing Site Management Support to four sites: Nea Kavala, Alexandria, Lagadikia and Vasilika. In line with its protection mandate, UNHCR also provides protection services and monitoring in all sites. Furthermore, the organization provides accommodation for relocation candidates and vulnerable asylum-seekers, to support the European Union Relocation Program and in line with its policy on alternatives to camps.
    [Show full text]
  • Incised and Impressed Pottery During the Neolithic Period in Western Macedonia
    Incised and impressed pottery during the Neolithic period in Western Macedonia Magdalini Tsigka SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts (MA) in the Classical Archaeology and the Ancient History of Macedonia December 2018 Thessaloniki – Greece 2 Student Name: Magdalini Tsigka SID: 2204150030 Supervisor: Prof. S. M. Valamoti I hereby declare that the work submitted is mine and that where I have made use of another’s work, I have attributed the source(s) according to the Regulations set in the Student’s Handbook. December 2018 Thessaloniki - Greece 3 Preface This study is the completion of the postgraduate course of MA in the Classical Archaeology and the Ancient History of Macedonia at the International University of Thessaloniki. In order for this thesis to be completed, the contribution of some people was important. First of all, I would like to thank Prof. S. M. Valamoti who accepted to supervise my thesis and encouraged me in all its stages. I would also like to thank Dr. A. Dimoula who helped me throughout all the steps for its completion, from finding the subject up to the end of my work. She was always present to direct me and to solve any questions or concerns about the subject. Then I want to thank L. Gkelou, archaeologist of the Ephorate of Florina, for entrusting me material from the excavation of Anargyroi VIIc and made this study possible despite all the adversities. Also, I would like to thank the Director of the Ephorate of Florina, Dr C. Ziota, for the discussion and the information she gave me during my study of the material.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibitors Index
    Exhibitors Index 1 ANUGA 2017 EXHIBITORS INDEX Hall 10.2 ALMOND PRODUCTS BALAMOUTSOS DANAIS S.A. ENTHALPIA-DIMITRIS GREEK PITTA INTEROLIVA S.A. KYKNOS S.A. Fine Food HATZIGEORGIOU S.A. KONSTANTINOS PC Stand# G-028 PAPPAS FLAMPOURIOTIKI Stand# i-028 Stand# I-010 Stand# I-016 Stand# H-020, I-021 Page: 14 Stand# H-016 Stand# H-016 Page: 19 Page: 21 Page: 11 Page: 13 Page: 16 Page: 18 ACHAIAVALUES DEAS S.A. ISOSTEVIA, PANAGOTA LADAS FOODS S.A. DEVELOPMENT AMALTHIA S.A. BONUM TERRAE S.A. Stand# I-008A EPSA S.A. GREKA ICONS S.A. BROS G.P. Stand# I-025 COMPANY OF THE Stand# I-041 Stand# H-020, I-021 Page: 14 Stand# G-014 Stand# I-022 Stand# G-042 Page: 21 CHAMBER OF ACHAIA Page: 11 Page: 13 Page: 16 Page: 18 Page: 19 Stand# I-031 DIMITRA PARPARAS LARISSA CHAMBER Page: 10 ANASTASSIOU FOODS BOUDOURIS G.P. S.A. EUROPEAN RICE AND HELLAS QUALITY JANNIS S.A. Stand# G-008 S.A. Stand# I-049 Stand# H-028 MACARONI COMPANY FOODS Stand# G-038 Page: 21 AGRICULTURAL Stand# G-018 Page: 13 Page: 15 S.A. (EURIMAC S.A.) Stand# H-043b Page: 20 ASSOCIATION OF Page: 11 Stand# G-008A Page: 18 LELIA FOODS S.A. AMFISSA CAMPUS S.A. E-LA-WON Page: 16 KALLONI S.A. Stand# H-038 Stand# G-046 ARISTON HELLAS O.E. Stand# I-014 Stand# H-020, I-021 HELLENIC CROPS INC Stand# G-032 Page: 22 Page: 10 Stand# I-015 Page: 13 Page: 15 EVRIPIDIS S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Statistical Battle for the Population of Greek Macedonia
    XII. The Statistical Battle for the Population of Greek Macedonia by Iakovos D. Michailidis Most of the reports on Greece published by international organisations in the early 1990s spoke of the existence of 200,000 “Macedonians” in the northern part of the country. This “reasonable number”, in the words of the Greek section of the Minority Rights Group, heightened the confusion regarding the Macedonian Question and fuelled insecurity in Greece’s northern provinces.1 This in itself would be of minor importance if the authors of these reports had not insisted on citing statistics from the turn of the century to prove their points: mustering historical ethnological arguments inevitably strengthened the force of their own case and excited the interest of the historians. Tak- ing these reports as its starting-point, this present study will attempt an historical retrospective of the historiography of the early years of the century and a scientific tour d’horizon of the statistics – Greek, Slav and Western European – of that period, and thus endeavour to assess the accuracy of the arguments drawn from them. For Greece, the first three decades of the 20th century were a long period of tur- moil and change. Greek Macedonia at the end of the 1920s presented a totally different picture to that of the immediate post-Liberation period, just after the Balkan Wars. This was due on the one hand to the profound economic and social changes that followed its incorporation into Greece and on the other to the continual and extensive population shifts that marked that period. As has been noted, no fewer than 17 major population movements took place in Macedonia between 1913 and 1925.2 Of these, the most sig- nificant were the Greek-Bulgarian and the Greek-Turkish exchanges of population under the terms, respectively, of the 1919 Treaty of Neuilly and the 1923 Lausanne Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • SWOT Analysis
    Military Assets as Public Spaces Integrated Action Plan on the Re-Use of Ex-Military Assets in the City of Serres Serres, May 2018 Contents Chapter 1: Assessment ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 General info ............................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1.1 Location, history, key demographics, infrastructure, economy and employment ........................... 4 1.1.2 Planning, land uses and cultural assets in the city ........................................................................... 8 1.2 Vision of Serres ...................................................................................................................................... 11 1.3 The military camps in Serres .................................................................................................................. 12 1.3.1 Project Area 1: Papalouka former military camp ............................................................................ 14 1.3.2 Project area 2: Emmanouil Papa former military camp.................................................................. 18 1.3.3 The Legislative Framework ............................................................................................................. 21 1.3.4 The particularities of the military assets in Serres .......................................................................... 22
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty Series Recueil Des Traites
    UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES Treaty Series Treaties and internationatagreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations VOLUME 388 Recueil des Traites Traitis et accords internationaux enregistrs ou classgs et inscrits au rdpertoire au Secrktariat de l'Organisationdes Nations Unies Treaties and international agreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations VOLUME 388 1961 I. Nos. 5570-5587 TABLE OF CONTENTS Treaties and international agreements registered from 6 February 1961 to 23 February 1961 Page No. 5570. Yugoslavia and Greece: Agreement (with annexes and exchange of letters) concerning frontier traffic. Signed at Athens, on 18 June 1959 . ... .............. 3 No. 5571. United Nations and Togo: Agreement (with annex) for the provision of operational and executive personnel. Signed at Lom6, on 6 May 1960 ... ............ ... 53 No. 5572. Union of South Africa and United States of America: Exchange of notes constituting an agreement for the erection of space tracking stations in South Africa. Pretoria, 13 September 1960 ..... 65 No. 5573. United Nations Special Fund and Somalia: Agreement concerning assistance from the Special Fund. Signed at Mogadiscio, on 28 January 1961 .... ................. .... 75 No. 5574. Belgium and Greece: General Convention on Social Security. Signed at Athens, on 1 April 1958 . 93 No. 5575. United Nations and United Arab Republic: Exchange of letters constituting an agreement concerning the settlement of claims between the United Nations Emergency Force and the Govern- ment arising out of traffic accidents. Gaza, 14 October 1959 and Cairo, 15 September and 17 October 1960 .... ................ ... 143 No. 5576. United Nations Special Fund and Mexico: Agreement (with exchange of letters) concerning assistance from the Special Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • ANASTASIOS GEORGOTAS “Archaeological Tourism in Greece
    UNIVERSITY OF THE PELOPONNESE ANASTASIOS GEORGOTAS (R.N. 1012201502004) DIPLOMA THESIS: “Archaeological tourism in Greece: an analysis of quantitative data, determining factors and prospects” SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: - Assoc. Prof. Nikos Zacharias - Dr. Aphrodite Kamara EXAMINATION COMMITTEE: - Assoc. Prof. Nikolaos Zacharias - Dr. Aphrodite Kamara - Dr. Nikolaos Platis ΚΑΛΑΜΑΤΑ, MARCH 2017 Abstract . For many decades now, Greece has invested a lot in tourism which can undoubtedly be considered the country’s most valuable asset and “heavy industry”. The country is gifted with a rich and diverse history, represented by a variety of cultural heritage sites which create an ideal setting for this particular type of tourism. Moreover, the variations in Greece’s landscape, cultural tradition and agricultural activity favor the development and promotion of most types of alternative types of tourism, such as agro-tourism, religious, sports and medicinal tourism. However, according to quantitative data from the Hellenic Statistical Authority, despite the large number of visitors recorded in state-run cultural heritage sites every year, the distribution pattern of visitors presents large variations per prefecture. A careful examination of this data shows that tourist flows tend to concentrate in certain prefectures, while others enjoy little to no visitor preference. The main factors behind this phenomenon include the number and importance of cultural heritage sites and the state of local and national infrastructure, which determines the accessibility of sites. An effective analysis of these deficiencies is vital in order to determine solutions in order to encourage the flow of visitors to the more “neglected” areas. The present thesis attempts an in-depth analysis of cultural tourism in Greece and the factors affecting it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aromanians in Macedonia
    Macedonian Historical Review 3 (2012) Македонска историска ревија 3 (2012) EDITORIAL BOARD: Boban PETROVSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia (editor-in-chief) Nikola ŽEŽOV, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Dalibor JOVANOVSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Toni FILIPOSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Charles INGRAO, Purdue University, USA Bojan BALKOVEC, University of Ljubljana,Slovenia Aleksander NIKOLOV, University of Sofia, Bulgaria Đorđe BUBALO, University of Belgrade, Serbia Ivan BALTA, University of Osijek, Croatia Adrian PAPAIANI, University of Elbasan, Albania Oliver SCHMITT, University of Vienna, Austria Nikola MINOV, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia (editorial board secretary) ISSN: 1857-7032 © 2012 Faculty of Philosophy, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, Macedonia University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius - Skopje Faculty of Philosophy Macedonian Historical Review vol. 3 2012 Please send all articles, notes, documents and enquiries to: Macedonian Historical Review Department of History Faculty of Philosophy Bul. Krste Misirkov bb 1000 Skopje Republic of Macedonia http://mhr.fzf.ukim.edu.mk/ [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 Nathalie DEL SOCORRO Archaic Funerary Rites in Ancient Macedonia: contribution of old excavations to present-day researches 15 Wouter VANACKER Indigenous Insurgence in the Central Balkan during the Principate 41 Valerie C. COOPER Archeological Evidence of Religious Syncretism in Thasos, Greece during the Early Christian Period 65 Diego PEIRANO Some Observations about the Form and Settings of the Basilica of Bargala 85 Denitsa PETROVA La conquête ottomane dans les Balkans, reflétée dans quelques chroniques courtes 95 Elica MANEVA Archaeology, Ethnology, or History? Vodoča Necropolis, Graves 427a and 427, the First Half of the 19th c.
    [Show full text]
  • An Insight Guide of Prespa Lakes Region Short Description of the Region
    An Insight Guide of Prespa Lakes Region Short description of the region Located in the north-western corner of Greece at 850 metres above sea level and surrounded by mountains, the Prespa Lakes region is a natural park of great significance due to its biodiversity and endemic species. Prespa is a trans boundary park shared between Greece, Albania and FYR Macedonia. It only takes a few moments for the receptive visitor to see that they have arrived at a place with its own unique personality. Prespa is for those who love nature and outdoor activities all year round. This is a place to be appreciated with all the senses, as if it had been designed to draw us in, and remind us that we, too, are a part of nature. Prespa is a place where nature, art and history come together in and around the Mikri and Megali Prespa lakes; there are also villages with hospitable inhabitants, always worth a stop on the way to listen to their stories and the histories of the place. The lucky visitor might share in the activities of local people’s daily life, which are all closely connected to the seasons of the year. These activities have, to a large extent, shaped the life in Prespa. The three main traditional occupations in the region are agriculture, animal husbandry and fishing. There are a lot of paths, guiding you into the heart of nature; perhaps up into the high mountains, or to old abandoned villages, which little by little are being returned once more to nature’s embrace.
    [Show full text]
  • Blood Ties: Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878
    BLOOD TIES BLOOD TIES Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 I˙pek Yosmaog˘lu Cornell University Press Ithaca & London Copyright © 2014 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 2014 by Cornell University Press First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 2014 Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Yosmaog˘lu, I˙pek, author. Blood ties : religion, violence,. and the politics of nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 / Ipek K. Yosmaog˘lu. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8014-5226-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8014-7924-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Macedonia—History—1878–1912. 2. Nationalism—Macedonia—History. 3. Macedonian question. 4. Macedonia—Ethnic relations. 5. Ethnic conflict— Macedonia—History. 6. Political violence—Macedonia—History. I. Title. DR2215.Y67 2013 949.76′01—dc23 2013021661 Cornell University Press strives to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing of its books. Such materials include vegetable-based, low-VOC inks and acid-free papers that are recycled, totally chlorine-free, or partly composed of nonwood fibers. For further information, visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. Cloth printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Paperback printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 To Josh Contents Acknowledgments ix Note on Transliteration xiii Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Company Profile
    Company Profile DEPA at a glance The history of DEPA The natural gas system in Greece DEPA Group Strategic Goals of DEPA Legislative – regulative framework of natural gas Commercial activities of DEPA Sectors of natural gas consumption – Customers Distribution System Gas Supply Companies (EPAs) DEPA at the international setting Human resources Vision for sustainable development Corporate Social Responsibility The gas networks in Europe Statistics on natural gas and energy in Europe Financial statement 2010 >01 Natural gas is the fastest growing form of primary energy world-wide, given - on the one hand - its advantages compared to other forms of energy based on fossil fuels and - on the other hand - its decisive contribution in the defense of the necessary elements for Sustainable Development, i.e. “Environment, Society, Economy”. And this is because: • Natural gas allows greater energy efficiency compared to other fuels on all production segments, primarily for power generation using combined cycle technology, • Natural gas is more environmentally friendly since, per unit of energy produced, it is less damaging to the environment by 38% compared to coal, by 28% compared to crude oil and by 24% compared to diesel oil. Those percentages are in reality increased taking into account the greater efficiency rate of gas against the above fuels under comparison, • Natural gas provides greater flexibility as a fuel and is easy to use and handle in all domestic, commercial or industrial applications. The combination of all those characteristics
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality and Hydrological Regime Monitoring Network. Greek Biotope/Wetland Centre (EKBY)
    LIFE ENVIRONMENT STRYMON Ecosystem Based Water Resources Management to Minimize Environmental Impacts from Agriculture Using State of the Art Modeling Tools in Strymonas Basin LIFE03 ENV/GR/000217 Task 2. Monitor Crop Pattern, Water Quality and Hydrological Regime Action 2.3: Water Quality and Hydrological Regime monitoring network Establishment of a water Quality and Hydrological regime Monitoring Network in Strymonas Basin Date of submission of the report: 30/11/2004 The present work is part of the 4-years project: “Ecosystem Based Water Resources Management to Minimize Environmental Impacts from Agriculture Using State of the Art Modeling Tools in Strymonas Basin” (contract number LIFE03 ENV/GR/000217). The project is co-funded by the European Union, the Hellinic Ministry of Agriculture, the Goulandris Natural History Museum - Greek Biotope/Wetland Centre (EKBY), the Prefecture of Serres – Directorate of Land Reclamation of Serres (DEB-S), the Development Agency of Serres S.A. (ANESER S.A.) and the Local Association for the Protection of Lake Kerkini (SPALK). This document may be cited as follows: Chalkidis, I., D. Papadimos, Ch. Mertzianis. 2004. Water Quality and Hydrological Regime monitoring network. Greek Biotope/Wetland Centre (EKBY). Thermi, Greece. 21 p. PROJECT TEAM Greek Biotope/Wetland Centre (EKBY) Papadimos Dimitris (Project Manager) Chalkidis Iraklis (Agricultural Engineer) Anastasiadis Manolis (Agricultural Engineer) Apostolakis Antonis (Geographic Information System Expert) Hatziiordanou Lena (Geographic Information
    [Show full text]