Tahquamenon River Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tahquamenon River Assessment ATUR F N AL O R T E N S E O U M R T C R E A S STATE OF MICHIGAN P E DNR D M ICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SR45 February 2008 Tahquamenon River Assessment James R. Waybrant and Troy G. Zorn www.michigan.gov/dnr/ FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT 45 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Special Report 45 February 2008 Tahquamenon River Assessment James R. Waybrant and Troy G. Zorn MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) MISSION STATEMENT “The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is committed to the conservation, protection, management, use and enjoyment of the State’s natural resources for current and future generations.” NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION (NRC) STATEMENT The Natural Resources Commission, as the governing body for the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, provides a strategic framework for the DNR to effectively manage your resources. The NRC holds monthly, public meetings throughout Michigan, working closely with its constituencies in establishing and improving natural resources management policy. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES NON DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources. Both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, sex, height, weight or marital status under the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 as amended (MI PA 453 and MI PA 220, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act). If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility, or if you desire additional information, please write: HUMAN RESOURCES Or MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS Or OFFICE FOR DIVERSITY AND CIVIL RIGHTS MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CADILLAC PLACE US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE PO BOX 30028 3054 W. GRAND BLVD., SUITE 3-600 4040 NORTH FAIRFAX DRIVE LANSING MI 48909-7528 DETROIT MI 48202 ARLINGTON VA 22203 For information or assistance on this publication, contact the MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Fisheries Division, PO BOX 30446, LANSING, MI 48909, or call 517-373-1280. TTY/TDD: 711 (Michigan Relay Center) This information is available in alternative formats. ATUR F N AL O R T E N S E O U M R T C Printed under authority of Michigan Department of Natural Resources R E A S P E DNR D Total number of copies printed 25 — Total cost $541.26 — Cost per copy $21.65 M ICHIGAN Tahquamenon River Assessment Suggested Citation Format Waybrant, J.R., and T.G. Zorn. 2008. Tahquamenon River Assessment. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Special Report 45, Ann Arbor. ii Tahquamenon River Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS ........................................................................................vi LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................vii LIST OF TABLES..................................................................................................... viii LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................. x ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................xi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................xii INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 RIVER ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 4 Geography ........................................................................................................................... 4 Upper River Segment.................................................................................................... 4 Dollarville Segment ....................................................................................................... 4 Marsh Drainage Segment ............................................................................................. 5 Middle River Segment................................................................................................... 5 Hendrie River............................................................................................................. 5 Sage River ................................................................................................................. 6 Lower River Segment.................................................................................................... 6 East Branch Tahquamenon River ................................................................................. 6 History.................................................................................................................................. 6 General............................................................................................................................. 6 Archaeology....................................................................................................................13 Geology ............................................................................................................................. 14 Bedrock Geology............................................................................................................ 15 Surface Geology............................................................................................................. 15 Upper River Segment.................................................................................................. 15 Dollarville Segment ..................................................................................................... 16 Marsh Drainage Segment ........................................................................................... 16 Middle River Segment................................................................................................. 16 Hendrie River........................................................................................................... 16 Sage River ............................................................................................................... 16 Lower River Segment.................................................................................................. 16 East Branch Tahquamenon River ............................................................................... 17 Hydrology........................................................................................................................... 17 Climate ........................................................................................................................... 17 Annual Stream Flows ..................................................................................................... 17 Seasonal Flow Stability .................................................................................................. 18 Connected Marshes .................................................................................................... 20 Soils and Land Use............................................................................................................ 20 Soils and Stream Crossings ........................................................................................... 20 Land Use ........................................................................................................................22 Channel Morphology.......................................................................................................... 22 Channel Gradient ........................................................................................................... 22 Upper River Segment.................................................................................................. 23 iii Tahquamenon River Assessment Dollarville Segment ..................................................................................................... 23 Marsh Drainage Segment ........................................................................................... 24 Middle River Segment................................................................................................. 24 Hendrie River........................................................................................................... 24 Sage River ............................................................................................................... 24 Lower River Segment.................................................................................................. 24 East Branch Tahquamenon River............................................................................... 25 Other Tributaries ......................................................................................................... 25 Channel Cross Sections................................................................................................. 25 Instream and Riparian Habitat Conditions...................................................................... 26 Upper River Segment.................................................................................................. 26 Dollarville Segment ..................................................................................................... 27 Marsh Drainage Segment ..........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Characterizing the Flow Regime in Brook Trout (Salvelinus Fontinalis) Incubation Habitats and the Implications for Management in a Hydro-Regulated River
    Characterizing the flow regime in Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) incubation habitats and the implications for management in a hydro-regulated river by Stephen Slongo A Master’s thesis presented in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Forestry Faculty of Natural Resources Management Lakehead University Thunder Bay, Ontario January 2018 1 Abstract Hydropower accounts for more than one third of Ontario Power Generation’s electrical production. Hydroelectric development often occurs on rivers that also support recreational fisheries. The construction and operation of dams, diversions and generating facilities unavoidably influence the ecological function of rivers. The Aguasabon River is a northern Canadian Shield river with major developments for water diversion, storage, and power generation. This river offers opportunity to examine the importance of vertical flows through the substrate at a Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) spawning area. The vertical and horizontal hydraulic gradients and subsequent water temperature changes are the subject of this study. Piezometers were used to monitor the river and subsurface water levels near Brook Trout redds during the spawning and incubation period under normal and increasing discharge conditions. The Brook Trout spawning area in the Aguasabon River experienced upwelling conditions for the entire monitoring period (Oct 28th, 2016 – Jan 13th, 2017) before water release at the Long Lake Control Dam (LLCD). Hyporheic temperatures declined gradually, remaining >3.7 °C. The river temperature in the winter before water release was 1.5 °C. Rapid increase in water level after discharge from above the LLCD resulted in the reversal of flow in the hyporheic zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Muskallonge Lake State Park Appendix B
    Appendix B – Public & Tribal Input Summary Over the duration of the General Management Planning process, the Muskallonge Lake State Park Planning Team ensured a variety of opportunities for public input and feedback. The process could be followed and comments posted at the Muskallonge Lake State Park Website: Overview of Public Input Opportunities Stakeholder Input Meeting (October 22, 2015) – located at the LMAS District Health Department. Stakeholders had the opportunity to learn about the General Management Planning process and provide input regarding their concerns, vision of the park, how they could contribution to make their vision possible. Over 40 stakeholders were invited to the open house; 9 stakeholders attended. General Management Plan Tribal Outreach – !s part of the DNR’s outreach efforts, a letter was sent to the Federally recognized Tribal Governments in the region, informing them of the management planning efforts and inviting them to meet with representatives of the DNR to discuss any issues or concerns they may have relating to Muskallonge Lake State Park. A copy of the letter follows, as well as all received responses. The letter was sent to the following Tribes: Bay Mills Indian Community, Brimley, Michigan Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, Suttons Bay, Michigan Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians, Harbor Springs, Michigan Little River Band of Ottawa Indians, Manistee, Michigan Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians, Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan Public Input Meeting (May 19, 2016) – located at the LMAS Health Department. Members of the public are invited to learn about the General Management Planning process and comment on the Statements of Significance and the Draft 10-Year Action Goals.
    [Show full text]
  • CORA Code – Great Lakes Fishing Regulations
    CHIPPEWA OTTAWA RESOURCE AUTHORITY COMMERCIAL, SUBSISTENCE, AND RECREATIONAL FISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE 1836 TREATY CEDED WATERS OF LAKES SUPERIOR, HURON, AND MICHIGAN Adopted August 31, 2000 Effective September 7, 2000 Revised March 4, 2019 CHIPPEWA OTTAWA RESOURCE AUTHORITY COMMERCIAL, SUBSISTENCE, AND RECREATIONAL FISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE 1836 TREATY CEDED WATERS OF LAKES SUPERIOR, HURON, AND MICHIGAN CONTENTS PART ONE: GENERAL MATTERS PART FIVE: NON-COMMERCIAL FISHING I. Purpose……………………………………1 XVII. Recreational Fishing……………………….…28 II. Scope and Application……………………1 XVIII. Tribal Charter Boat Operations………………28 III. Definitions……………………………...1-4 XIX. Subsistence Fishing……………………….28-30 PART TWO: ZONES PART SIX: LICENSES AND INFORMATION IV. Commercial Fishing Zones………………4 XX. License and Registration Definitions and Regulations…………………………………...30 V. Tribal Zones………………………........4-8 XXI. License Regulations……………………....31-32 VI. Intertribal Zones………………………8-10 XXII. Harvest Reporting and Sampling………....32-34 VII. Trap Net Zones…………………........10-12 XXIII. Assessment Fishing……………………… 34-35 VIII. Closed or Limited Fishing Zones……12-14 PART THREE: GEAR PART SEVEN: REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT IX. Gear Restrictions……….…………......14-17 XXIV. Tribal Regulations……………………………35 X. State-Funded Trap Net Conversion Operations……………………………17-18 XXV. Orders of the Director…………………..........35 XXVI. Jurisdiction and Enforcement…………….35-37 PART FOUR: SPECIES XXVII. Criminal Provisions………………………….37 XI. Lake Trout…………………………...18-19 XII. Salmon……………………………….19-21 PART EIGHT: ACCESS XIII. Walleye…………………………….…21-23 XXVIII. Use of Access Sites……………………..37-38 XIV. Yellow Perch………………………...23-26 XV. Other Species………………………...26-27 XVI. Prohibited Species……………………… 27 CHIPPEWA OTTAWA RESOURCE AUTHORITY COMMERCIAL, SUBSISTENCE, AND RECREATIONAL FISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE 1836 TREATY CEDED WATERS OF LAKES SUPERIOR, HURON, AND MICHIGAN PART ONE: GENERAL MATTERS SECTION I.
    [Show full text]
  • Outlook for Break-Up of Ice on the St.Lawrence Seaway & Lake Erie Issued by the Canadian Ice Service
    OUTLOOK FOR BREAK-UP OF ICE ON THE ST.LAWRENCE SEAWAY & LAKE ERIE ISSUED BY THE CANADIAN ICE SERVICE Issued by Canadian Ice Service of Environment and Climate Change Canada Prepared for The Saint-Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation 2 February 2021 CURRENT CONDITIONS Average temperatures over Lake Erie, Lake Ontario, and the Seaway have been well above normal values consistently since the start of the ice season in early November until near the end of January. At the end of January, temperatures were near to below normal. The highest temperature anomalies occurred in the second half of December and first half of January. The table below indicates the departure from normal temperatures at specific locations, on a bi- weekly basis, for the period from mid-November to the end of January: November December January 16 Nov. – 16-30 31 Jan 01-15 16-31 01-15 16-31 Montreal +2.0 ºC +4.0ºC +4.1ºC +6.8ºC +0.9ºC +3.6ºC Kingston +2.8ºC +2.3ºC +3.2ºC +5.4ºC +1.0ºC +2.9ºC Windsor +1.5ºC +1.3ºC +2.0ºC +4.3ºC +1.4ºC +2.2ºC Table 1: Departure from normal temperatures With the warm conditions experienced through November across the southern Great Lakes (Erie and Ontario), no ice formed in November. The first ice was recorded on December 16th in the Bay of Quinte and in sheltered bays in eastern Lake Ontario, which was a week earlier than normal. In Lake Erie, the first ice was seen a week and a half later, on December 26th, in line with climatology.
    [Show full text]
  • NIAGARA RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN (Phase 1)
    ATLAS NIAGARA RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN (Phase 1) September 2013 During the development of the Niagara River Watershed Management Plan (Phase 1), an impressive collection of existing plans, studies, reports, data, information and maps were gathered and reviewed to help establish the overall physical, biological and ecological conditions of the Niagara River Watershed. This Atlas is a full assembly of these resources, providing a comprehensive record of previous watershed efforts utilized in the watershed management planning process. NIAGARA RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN Developed By: 1250 Niagara Street Buffalo, NY 14213 Buffalo Niagara RIVERKEEPER® is a community‐based organization dedicated to protecting the quality and quantity of water, while connecting people to water. We do this by cleaning up pollution from our waterways, restoring fish and wildlife habitat, and enhancing public access through greenways that expand parks and open space. In Conjunction with: 2919 Delaware Ave. 478 Main Street Kenmore, NY 14217 Buffalo, NY 14202 Financial support for the development of this Atlas and the Niagara River Watershed Management Plan (Phase 1) is from the New York State Department of State with funds provided under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. For more information on the Niagara River Watershed Management Plan (Phase 1), or to become involved in our regional watershed’s protection and restoration, visit Buffalo Niagara RIVERKEEPER® online at www.bnriverkeeper.org. For more information regarding watershed planning in New York State, visit the NYS Department of State’s website at www.nyswaterfronts.com/watershed_home.asp. 1 NIAGARA RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN 2 NIAGARA RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN Atlas Layout The Atlas has been divided into the following sections that correspond with the watershed as a whole and the 11 sub-watersheds that make up the Niagara River watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan's Upper Peninsula Hi Folks
    November 1, 2014 - No. 35 Featured Photograph No. 1 Upper Tahquamenon Falls, Michigan's Upper Peninsula Hi Folks , I’m happy to announce that one of my photographs was accepted to appear in the Midwest Museum of American Art’s 36th Juried Regional Art Exhibition. This competition covered 22 counties in northern Indiana and Michigan. My photograph, along with various other winning works of art will be displayed at the museum in Elkhart, Indiana until December 7th. You may view this photograph by clicking on the following link: Autumn Rush Autumn Splendor Part 1 - - Michigan's Upper Peninsula I recently returned from spending 2 ½ weeks in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula (“UP”) chasing autumn colors which were outstanding and some of the best in the U.S. I was able to photograph converted by Web2PDFConvert.com so much beauty that I’ve decided to make a separate category on my website dedicated to the UP. You may see what’s been added so far by clicking on the following link: Michigan's Upper Peninsula When people think of the UP, they often bring to mind the famous Mackinac Bridge, which connects the lower and upper peninsula. What some don’t realize is that the UP is about 320 miles from east to west, and most of it is west of the bridge. For those of you not familiar with the UP, I’d like to share some information that might give you an idea, along with my photographs, of what a wild and beautiful place it is. The UP contains 16,400 square miles, about 29% of Michigan’s total land area, but only about 3% of its population.
    [Show full text]
  • General Management Plan Tahquamenon Falls State Park
    F General Management Plan Tahquamenon Falls State Park Approved February 1, 2017 Michigan DNR Parks and Recreation Division Tahquamenon Falls State Park General Management Plan Prepared with assistance of: 28 W. Adams | Suite #1200 Detroit, MI 48226 www.giffelswebster.com Tahquamenon Falls State Park General Management Plan Tahquamenon Falls State Park General Management Plan TAHQUAMENON FALLS STATE PARK PLAN APPROVAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The following dates reference when the plans were presented for recommendation. In some instances, additional time was allotted for plan review following the presentation with subsequent approval received by Email. PRD – SECTION CHIEFS: 10/03/2016 Date PRD – MANAGEMENT TEAM: 10/27/2016 (via Email) Date DNR – RESOURCE MANAGEMENT BUREAU: 11/03/2016 Date MSPAC – STEWARDSHIP SUBCOMMITTEE 11/07/2016 Date NRC – MICHIGAN STATE PARKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE: 12/08/2016 Date Tahquamenon Falls State Park General Management Plan Resolution No. 12-2016-1 MICHIGAN STATE PARKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (MSPAC) RESOLUTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE “TAHQUAMENON FALLS STATE PARK GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN” ADOPTED: December 8, 2016 WHEREAS, the Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Parks and Recreation Division has completed the General Management Plan for Tahquamenon Falls State Park; and WHEREAS, the planning process reflects sensitivity to natural resource values, historic and cultural resource values, recreation and education opportunities, and is inclusive of all DNR programs and representative of eco-management; and WHEREAS, the
    [Show full text]
  • French River Provincial Park Management Plan
    French River Provincial Park Management Plan November 1993 C 1993 Queen’s Printer for Ontario Printed in Ontario, Canada For more information or additional copies of this publication contact: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 199 Larch St., Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 5P9. Telephone (705) 675-4120 Approval Statement We are pleased to approve this revised Management Plan as official policy for the French River Provincial Park. The plan reflects the Ministry of Natural Resources’ intent to protect the natural and cultural features of French River Provincial Park while maintaining high quality opportunities for outdoor recreation and heritage appreciation for Ontario’s residents and visitors. The Park’s original management plan was written in 1986 when the French River became the first Canadian Heritage River in Canada. French River Provincial Park was established in 1989. The River is unique within Ontario’s Provincial Park system as the largest waterway park draining into the Great Lakes. A drainageway in this part of the Canadian Shield proceeded the last glacial period, which began 45, 000 years ago. The Park contains an extensive bedrock delta and a fault controlled main river channel. Shoreline habitats from Georgian Bay to Lake Nipissing including wetlands and upland forests. The waterway is an ancient travel route, which has been used since cultures inhabited this part of Ontario 6,000 years ago. It has been an important recreation and tourism area for 100 years. Today the scenic quality of the River continues to be an outstanding attraction for visitors. The policies in this Plan are consistent with new implementation details on province wide policies for park planning and management.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Fishes of Thunder Bay District, Ontario
    Thunder Bay Field Naturalists Checklist of Fish es of Thunder Bay District , Ontario 31 December 2019 Introduction This first edition of Checklist of Fishes of Thunder Bay District adds to existing checklists prepared by members of the Thunder Bay Field Naturalists (TBFN) covering other vertebrate taxa (mammals, birds, reptiles & amphibians), as well vascular plants, butterflies, and odonates. As with these other checklists, it covers the official judicial District of Thunder Bay (Figure 1). The District extends from the eastern border of Quetico Provincial Park east to White River, and from the international border north to Lake St. Joseph and the Albany River. Much of the District (60%) is within the Great Lakes watershed, with the remaining draining into the Arctic Ocean either north via the Hudson Bay Lowlands, or west via Rainy Lake/Lake of the Woods and the Nelson River watershed. Figure 1. Judicial District of Thunder Bay with primary watersheds and protected areas. 2 The fish species of the Thunder Bay District mostly reflect post-glacial colonization, modified by more recent ecological and anthropogenic influences. The Wisconsinan ice mass began to retreat north of Lake Superior circa 10,700 BP (Farrand and Drexler 1985), allowing fish to initially colonize the Thunder Bay area (Momot and Stephenson 1996). The Marquette advance circa 9900 BP likely wiped out these early colonizers, but its retreat around 9700 BP allowed many species access from glacial refugia in the Mississippi River basin to the south (Mandrak and Crossman 1992b; Stephenson and Momot 1994). Some species invaded from the east via the outlet of Lake Minong and Lake Superiors’ other post-glacial predecessors.
    [Show full text]
  • M I C H I G a N O N T a R
    314 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 6, Chapter 10 26 SEP 2021 85°W 84°W 83°W 82°W ONTARIO 2251 NORTH CHANNEL 46°N D E 14885 T 14882 O U R M S O F M A C K I N A A I T A C P S T R N I A T O S U S L A I N G I S E 14864 L A N Cheboygan D 14881 Rogers City 14869 14865 14880 Alpena L AKE HURON 45°N THUNDER BAY UNITED ST CANADA MICHIGAN A TES Oscoda Au Sable Tawas City 14862 44°N SAGINAW BAY Bay Port Harbor Beach Sebewaing 14867 Bay City Saginaw Port Sanilac 14863 Lexington 14865 43°N Port Huron Sarnia Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 6—Chapter 10 NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml 26 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 6, Chapter 10 ¢ 315 Lake Huron (1) Lawrence, Great Lakes, Lake Winnipeg and Eastern Chart Datum, Lake Huron Arctic for complete information.) (2) Depths and vertical clearances under overhead (12) cables and bridges given in this chapter are referred to Fluctuations of water level Low Water Datum, which for Lake Huron is on elevation (13) The normal elevation of the lake surface varies 577.5 feet (176.0 meters) above mean water level at irregularly from year to year. During the course of each Rimouski, QC, on International Great Lakes Datum 1985 year, the surface is subject to a consistent seasonal rise (IGLD 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Tahquamenon Falls State Park
    iver Rd. Betsy R W. d R e l k p Exploring c a o l M B P Tahquamenon Falls . R y s t e B State Park Lake SHEEPHEAD Farm Superior LAKE Tr uc k Tr ail BETSY Portage LAKE Trail CLARK PARADISE LAKE 8 4 Clark L P ake Rd. WATER TANK Clark LAKES NORTH COUNTRY TRAIL Lake Wilderness Loop Loop WHITEFISH 7 . BAY 6 Rd il s ra LOWER a r T e FALLS Fark iv . R Campground d R Day Use Area t Giant s 5 o l Pines r Loop P e b m i T CAMP 10 CO. Rd. 500 LAKES Newberry P UPPER NO RT M-123 FALLS H CO Picnic Area Halifax Rd. UNTRY TRAIL Day Use Area il Tahqua Tra QUAMENO P H N 3 TA R I Boat Launch VE Whitehouse R th P Landing Rivermou Campground 2 Emerson Trail Lone Pine 1 (Lake access) North Tahquamenon M-123 Bay 1 Lone Pine Access Site M28 From the end of the access road, overlooking Tahquamenon Bay, you can see Emerson Island. The island was the 5 Timberlost Road site of a large sawmill from 1882 to This sandy forest road offers some of 1912.This is a great place to play in the the park's best blueberry picking. When warm, shallow waters of inner Whitefish the berries are ripe, black bears, red Bay. Early mornings and late evenings foxes, coyotes and other animals can be are the best times to look for moose in seen. This road has loose sand, 8 Clark Lake this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Postglacial Water Levels in the Great Lakes Region in Relation to Holocene Climate Change: Thecamoebian and Palynological Evidence
    Postglacial Water Levels in the Great Lakes Region in Relation to Holocene Climate Change: Thecamoebian and Palynological Evidence by Adam Patrick Sarvis, B.Sc. A thesis submitted to the Department of Earth Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science December, 2000 Brock University St. Catharines, Ontario © Adam Patrick Sarvis, 2000 Abstract Various lake phases have developed in the upper Great Lakes in response to isostatic adjustment and changes in water supply since the retreat of the Laurentide Ice Sheet. Georgian Bay experienced a lowstand that caused a basin wide unconformity approximately 7,500 years ago that cannot be explained by geological events. Thecamoebians are shelled protozoans abundant in freshwater environments and they are generally more sensitive to changing environmental conditions than the surrounding vegetation. Thecamoebians can be used to reconstruct the paleolimnology. The abundance of thecamoebians belonging to the genus Centropyxis, which are known to tolerate slightly brackish conditions (i.e. high concentrations of ions) records highly evaporative conditions in a closed basin. During the warmer interval (9000 to 700 yBP), the Centropyxis - dominated population diminishes and is replaced by an abundant and diverse Difflugia dominate population. Historical climate records from Tobermory and Midland, Ontario were correlated with the Lake Huron water level curve. The fossil pollen record and comparison with modem analogues allowed a paleo-water budget to be calculated for Georgian Bay. Transfer function analysis of fossil pollen data from Georgian Bay records cold, dry winters similar to modem day Minneapolis, Minnesota. Drier climates around this time are also recorded in bog environments in Southem Ontario - the drying of Lake Tonawanda and inception of paludification in Willoughby Bog, for instance, dates around 7,000 years ago.
    [Show full text]