DOCSLIB.ORG

Joseph Mccarthy and the Red Scare David Culver Bridgewater State College

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Joseph Mccarthy and the Red Scare David Culver Bridgewater State College Bridgewater Review Volume 2 | Issue 3 Article 12 Jul-1984 Cultural Commentary: Joseph McCarthy and the Red Scare David Culver Bridgewater State College Recommended Citation Culver, David (1984). Cultural Commentary: Joseph McCarthy and the Red Scare. Bridgewater Review, 2(3), 23-25. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/br_rev/vol2/iss3/12 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. Joseph and McCarthy ••• the hI' f)o,·jd ell""" Ano<.:lllli' Pro/eHor (~l His/ory Red Scare ExactlY thirty years ago millions of New Deal. HUAC charged Franklin Americans were fascinated by a day-time TV Roosevelt's Administration with "coddling" drama featuring the Republican Senator Reds and claimed that the New Deal was from Wisconsin, Joseph McCarthy. The taking America down the road to socialism. Army-McCarthy hearings, called by one As the Cold War intensified in the late I940s, writer, "the greatest political show on HUAC conducted highly publicized earth," were televised by ABC from April 22 investigations of Communists in to June 17, 1954. For many it was the first government, education, industry, unions, opportunity to see the Senator whose name radio, and the movies. Long before Joseph epitomized militant anti-Communism and McCarthy seized the Communist issue, who since 1950 had attracted more attention HUAC bullied witnesses, smeared than the President ofthe United States. Few opponents, and cleverly manipulated the viewers could know, however, that TV's press. exposure would help destroy McCarthy's In 1948 HUAC heard testimony that political career and leaa to his censure by the would lead to one ofthe most famous battles Senate later that year. in American history, and, more than any Between 1950 and 1954, Joseph single event, would lend credibility to the McCarthy, whose name was part of the view that there were spies in high places. In political lexicon, was one of the most August, Whittaker Chambers, editor of powerful men in America. While many nation in the world. But in no time the Time Magazine and former Communist, reviled him as a crude demagogue, others security was gone and America faced a admitted that he had engaged in espionage saw his campaign to cleanse Communism deadly Soviet peril. Surely something had and named Alger Hiss as a Communist spy. from American life as a heroic crusade to gone wrong and for some the answer was a Hiss, a former State Department official save the Nation. Millions rallied to his gigantic and diabolically cunning epitomized the liberal elite who had done so banner and accepted his view that America's conspiracy. much to shape the New Deal. His accuser, failures after World War II stemmed from seedy, rumpled, with a history of instability, spies in high places. For a time McCarthy The Red Scare started slowly after the war seemed no match for the elegantly tailored, was the G.O.P.'s most popular speaker. His but, as the Soviets tightened their grip on well-heeled, well-connected Hiss. eastern Europe, fear of Communist allegations won praise from such large HUAC's investigation of Chambers' newspapers as the New York Daily News expansion became mixed with fear of charges, which launched Congressman. internal subversion -- especially when and the Chicago Tribune and from powerful Richard M. Nixon into the national newspaper chains like Scripps-Howard and evidence of spying came to light. In 1945 spotlight, led to Hiss' indictment for perjury Hearst. His efforts were lauded by such federal agents discovered classified gov­ in December 1948 (the statute of limitations popular radio commentators as Fulton ernment documents in the office of a left­ for espionage had expired). Though the Lewis Jr., Walter Winchell, and Paul wing journal, Amerasia. In 1945, Canadian charge was lying to the grand jury, everyone Harvey; and among his friends and officials uncovered an extensive Soviet spy knew the real issue was whether Hiss had supporters were Joseph P. Kennedy, J. ring. Uneasy over such disclosures, been a spy. Thoughout 1949 the great spy President Harry Truman, just nine days Edgar Hoover, and Richard M. Nixon. trial dominated the headlines and generated after outlining the Truman Doctrine which McCarthy's grip on the nation and its emotional debate. As numerous writers have crystalized the Cold War, initiated a federal obsession with subversion were the result of pointed out, Hiss quickly became a symbol. loyalty program whereby every federal For many Americans the contest was a a Red Scare, a noxious by-product of the employee, whether janitor or atomic Cold War. Thoughout United States struggle between leftist New Dealers and scientist, would be investigated. While well history, in times of unusual stress, right-wing anti-Communists. intended, it was a questionable move which Americans have been susceptible to fueled anxiety and led to abuse. While the Hiss proceedings were dividing conspiracy theories to explain their the nation, two shocking events of 1949 anxieties. Such a time was the late 1940s and Despite the Administration's security would add momentum to the spies-in­ the early 1950s when many Americans were system, which should have satisfied the most government notion. First came the confounded and frustrated by setbacks ardent inquisitor, talk of subversion and announcement of the "fall of China." Since abroad. After all, most Americans believed Communism mounted. By its activities, the the I930s America had been supporting that the United States had almost single­ House Un-American Activities Committee Chinese leader Chiang Kai-Shek and since handedly defeated Germany and Japan, had (HUAC), contributed to public 1945 had sent millions to aid him in his civil sole possession of the atom bomb, and at apprehension. Established in 1938, it war struggle against the Communists. In war's end in 1945, was the most powerful quickly became an instrument to attack the August the State Department conceded the 23 loss of the world's largest nation to nation. In the name of Heaven, is this the Others, to be sure, had raised the specter Communism. Secretary of State Dean best America can do?" of treason, but other Red-baiters lacked Acheson defended American policy, arguing The time was ripe for a demagogue and six McCarthy's phenomenal impudence and persuasively that the events in China were days after Fuch's arrest, with the Red Scare mendacity. As one veteran Washington beyond the control of the United States, and well under way, Joseph McCarthy, then a reporter wrote, "McCarthy was surely the put the blame squarely on Chiang Kai-Shek, relatively obscure Senator, told an audience champion liar. He lied with wild abandon; whose regime was corrupt and incompetent. in Wheeling, West Virginia: "I have here in he lied without evident fear; he lied in his Although the government's defense of its my hand a list of 205 - a list of names that teeth and in the teeth of truth." Crude and policy toward China was irrefutable, many were made known to the Secretary of State reckless, McCarthy did not hesitate to smear Americans, not generally informed, were as being members of the Communist Party his opponents and, when crossed, he got shocked and bewildered. The Chiang they and who nevertheless are still working and even, which made him a dangerous foe. knew was the Generalissimo seen frequently shaping policy in the State Department." A Many followers conceded that the Senator on the cover of Time Magazine, one of the few days later, he charged that there were played a little rough, but argued that war's Big Four (along with Roosevelt, "fifty-seven card-carrying members of the excesses were excusable in a life and death Stalin, and Churchill), dependable and pro­ Communist Party in the State Department." struggle. Nor could other witch hunters American. Besides, how could the most McCarthy had no lists; it was an enormous match McCarthy's skill in manipulating the powerful nation in the world lose China? fraud, but he was on the front pages of press. He pioneered the technique ofholding Sensible observers noted that America never newspapers, where he wanted to be and one press conference to announce that a had China to lose, but deceived by the where he intended to stay. shocking revelation would come at another illusion of omnipotence, Americans wanted McCarthy's allegations prompted an press conference later in the day. Afternoon to know where the government had gone investigation by a Senate committee which, newspapers would blaze such headlines as wrong. after almost five months, reported that the "McCARTHY TO NAME TOP Spy A month later came the second shock SOON." Headlines usually featured when the government announced that McCarthy's charges, while denials less the Soviet Union possessed the atom sensational and more complex were bomb. Americans, who had been buried at the end of the story. assured that the Soviets were years Even as skillful a demagogue as away from developing a nuclear McCarthy, however, could not have weapon, began to ask whether spies had thrived for so long without the events of turned over secrets to Stalin. 1950. First there was the arrest ofJulius By the end of 1949, talk of spies and and Ethel Rosenberg for spying, traitors was commonplace. President confirming what many already Truman's Attorney General warned accepted. In June the Korean War that Communists "are everywhere -- in turned the Cold War decidedly hot and factories, offices, butcher stores, on the accumulating frustrations were street corners, in private businesses." made to order for McCarthy. In this HUAC, which had just published a hysterical atmosphere. anti­ booklet entitled Spotlight on Spies, Communism demagoguery became warned in its annual report: "We feel commonplace with both Republicans more than ever impressed with the and Democrats raising the subversion insidiousness and vastness of the bogey.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CRITICAL THEORY and AUTHORITARIAN POPULISM Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism
    CDSMS EDITED BY JEREMIAH MORELOCK CRITICAL THEORY AND AUTHORITARIAN POPULISM Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism edited by Jeremiah Morelock Critical, Digital and Social Media Studies Series Editor: Christian Fuchs The peer-reviewed book series edited by Christian Fuchs publishes books that critically study the role of the internet and digital and social media in society. Titles analyse how power structures, digital capitalism, ideology and social struggles shape and are shaped by digital and social media. They use and develop critical theory discussing the political relevance and implications of studied topics. The series is a theoretical forum for in- ternet and social media research for books using methods and theories that challenge digital positivism; it also seeks to explore digital media ethics grounded in critical social theories and philosophy. Editorial Board Thomas Allmer, Mark Andrejevic, Miriyam Aouragh, Charles Brown, Eran Fisher, Peter Goodwin, Jonathan Hardy, Kylie Jarrett, Anastasia Kavada, Maria Michalis, Stefania Milan, Vincent Mosco, Jack Qiu, Jernej Amon Prodnik, Marisol Sandoval, Se- bastian Sevignani, Pieter Verdegem Published Critical Theory of Communication: New Readings of Lukács, Adorno, Marcuse, Honneth and Habermas in the Age of the Internet Christian Fuchs https://doi.org/10.16997/book1 Knowledge in the Age of Digital Capitalism: An Introduction to Cognitive Materialism Mariano Zukerfeld https://doi.org/10.16997/book3 Politicizing Digital Space: Theory, the Internet, and Renewing Democracy Trevor Garrison Smith https://doi.org/10.16997/book5 Capital, State, Empire: The New American Way of Digital Warfare Scott Timcke https://doi.org/10.16997/book6 The Spectacle 2.0: Reading Debord in the Context of Digital Capitalism Edited by Marco Briziarelli and Emiliana Armano https://doi.org/10.16997/book11 The Big Data Agenda: Data Ethics and Critical Data Studies Annika Richterich https://doi.org/10.16997/book14 Social Capital Online: Alienation and Accumulation Kane X.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chronicle Review Our 'Prophet of Deceit'
    The Chronicle Review Our 'Prophet of Deceit' WWII-era social scientists explained Trump’s appeal By Richard Wolin October 30, 2016 To date, much ink has spilled attempting to historically situate Donald Trump’s unprecedented and disturbing run for the American presidency. Of course, one of the problems in trying to do so is that, as a political outsider, Trump is a consummate shape- shifter. His positions can and do change from day to day, moment to moment. By the same token, this rather basic and unarguable fact already reveals something significant about his candidacy. Whereas such glaring inconsistencies would have undoubtedly torpedoed a conventional candidate, remarkably, for more than a year, they left Trump more or less politically unscathed. Trump himself quipped in January: "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody. And I wouldn’t lose any voters, OK?" Time and again, Trump’s bluster and outsize personality trump (pardonnez- moi) the customary considerations of rational accountability. His loyal supporters seem to be, for the most part, indifferent to what Trump says: whether or not it is practicable (a wall to stanch immigration from Mexico), or constitutional (his proposal of a religious test to rebuff Muslims seeking to enter the United States). Instead, their devotion is largely predicated on Trump’s personality and charisma. And on these grounds, they seem consistently willing to engage in a worrisome suspension of disbelief, waiving the evidentiary claims that voters traditionally rely on to evaluate a candidate’s trustworthiness and viability. Many commentators have also pondered whether Trump might be accurately described as a fascist.
    [Show full text]
  • The Authentic Appeal of the Lying Demagogue
    ASRXXX10.1177/0003122417749632American Sociological ReviewHahl et al. 7496322018 American Sociological Review 2018, Vol. 83(1) 1 –33 The Authentic Appeal of the © American Sociological Association 2018 https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417749632DOI: 10.1177/0003122417749632 Lying Demagogue: Proclaiming journals.sagepub.com/home/asr the Deeper Truth about Political Illegitimacy Oliver Hahl ,a Minjae Kim,b and Ezra W. Zuckerman Sivanb Abstract We develop and test a theory to address a puzzling pattern that has been discussed widely since the 2016 U.S. presidential election and reproduced here in a post-election survey: how can a constituency of voters find a candidate “authentically appealing” (i.e., view him positively as authentic) even though he is a “lying demagogue” (someone who deliberately tells lies and appeals to non-normative private prejudices)? Key to the theory are two points: (1) “common-knowledge” lies may be understood as flagrant violations of the norm of truth- telling; and (2) when a political system is suffering from a “crisis of legitimacy” (Lipset 1959) with respect to at least one political constituency, members of that constituency will be motivated to see a flagrant violator of established norms as an authentic champion of its interests. Two online vignette experiments on a simulated college election support our theory. These results demonstrate that mere partisanship is insufficient to explain sharp differences in how lying demagoguery is perceived, and that several oft-discussed factors—information access, culture, language, and gender—are not necessary for explaining such differences. Rather, for the lying demagogue to have authentic appeal, it is sufficient that one side of a social divide regards the political system as flawed or illegitimate.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper How Leaders Get the Worst out of People: the Threat Of
    Working Paper 2020/60/EFE How Leaders Get the Worst Out of People: The Threat of Hate-based Populism Manfred F. R. Kets de Vries INSEAD, [email protected] Taking Jair Bolsonaro, the President of Brazil, as case example, this article explores various manifestations of hatred, viewed from both an individual and societal perspective. Distinguishing between interpersonal and intergroup hatred, it is pointed out that hatred is like a contagious disease that has contributed to many atrocities. The article also discusses how hate-based populism uses ideologies as a bonding mechanism, describing the ways in which populist leaders use hatred to create ingroups and outgroups, uniting their constituencies through the use of the defense mechanisms of projection and splitting, and using outgroups as scapegoats. The dynamics of dehumanization are also explored. In addition, the article shows how the rise of social networking has made hatred more pernicious. It ends with suggestions about how hatred can be transcended and ways to overcome destructive feelings. Key Words: Hatred; Anger; Contempt; Envy; Splitting; Scapegoating; Projection; Interpersonal; Intergroup; Ingroup; Outgroup; Contagion; Ideology; Dehumanization; Social Networking; Populist Leader; Demagogue. Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=3741909 Working Paper is the author’s intellectual property. It is intended as a means to promote research to interested readers. Its content should not be copied or hosted on any server without written permission from [email protected] Find more INSEAD papers at https://www.insead.edu/faculty-research/research Copyright © 2020 INSEAD Hate, in the long run, is about as nourishing as cyanide. —Kurt Vonnegut Hating people is like burning down your own house to get rid of a rat.
    [Show full text]
  • End of Instruction Notes DAY 2 1949 NATO—North Atlantic Treaty
    End of Instruction Notes DAY 2 1949 NATO—North Atlantic Treaty Organization. When it became apparent the UN could not stop war and aggression, the former Allies signed this treaty stating, “armed attack against one or more of them…shall be considered an attack against all.” Truman did not allow the US to return to isolationism after WWII. Warsaw Pact—after NATO allowed West Germany to re-arm. Soviet Union responded by organizing a military alliance in Eastern Europe Soviets successfully test atomic bomb this led to the arms race with the US China turns communist with Mao Zedong 1950s 1950 Korean War—divided after WWII, by Allies occupying forces withdrew in 1948-49. North Korea invaded the south to reunite them. The Soviets were boycotting the UN. The UN voted to defend South Korea. Douglas MacArthur headed troops after years of fighting he wanted to push war harder and to consider the bomb. Truman disagreed. Mac went behind his back and Truman fired him. 1952--Communists took control of Iran. CIA overthrew communists and replaced with Shah 1953—President Eisenhower wants to end the Korean War—Stalin died—Korea divided on 48th parallel. Vietnam conflict starting. Eisenhower sends advisors. Latin America—US feared Soviets might try to spread communism there US first then the USSR tested nuclear bombs 1954—CIA overthrew Guatemala gov’t to replace with US friendly one 1957—Soviet uses ballistic missiles armed with nuclear warheads. US lags behind in missile technology. Soviets also launch Sputnik, 1st satellite to orbit the earth—this leads to the space race.
    [Show full text]
  • Black-Jewish Coalition” Unraveled: Where Does Israel Fit?
    The “Black-Jewish Coalition” Unraveled: Where Does Israel Fit? A Master’s Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Hornstein Jewish Professional Leadership Program Professors Ellen Smith and Jonathan Krasner Ph.D., Advisors In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by Leah Robbins May 2020 Copyright by Leah Robbins 2020 Acknowledgements This thesis was made possible by the generous and thoughtful guidance of my two advisors, Professors Ellen Smith and Jonathan Krasner. Their content expertise, ongoing encouragement, and loving pushback were invaluable to the work. This research topic is complex for the Jewish community and often wrought with pain. My advisors never once questioned my intentions, my integrity as a researcher, or my clear and undeniable commitment to the Jewish people of the past, present, and future. I do not take for granted this gift of trust, which bolstered the work I’m so proud to share. I am also grateful to the entire Hornstein community for making room for me to show up in my fullness, and for saying “yes” to authentically wrestle with my ideas along the way. It’s been a great privilege to stretch and grow alongside you, and I look forward to continuing to shape one another in the years to come. iii ABSTRACT The “Black-Jewish Coalition” Unraveled: Where Does Israel Fit? A thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Brandeis University Waltham, Massachusetts By Leah Robbins Fascination with the famed “Black-Jewish coalition” in the United States, whether real or imaginary, is hardly a new phenomenon of academic interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from Senator Joseph Mccarthy to the President of the United States
    Letter from Senator Joseph McCarthy to the President of the United States This letter from Senator Joseph McCarthy, Republican representative of Wisconsin, to President Harry Truman was written three days after McCarthy’s famous Wheeling Speech. This speech signaled McCarthy’s rise to influence, as he gained national attention by producing a piece of paper on which he claimed he had listed the names of 205 members of the Communist Party working secretly in the U.S. State Department. McCarthy was, at the time of this letter, beginning to exploit national concerns about Communist infiltration during the Cold War. This fear of infiltration was intensified by the Soviet Union’s recent development of the atomic bomb and the coming Communist takeover of China. “McCarthyism” however was not yet at its peak. Senator McCarthy here at first encourages President Truman to commit more resources to the war of containment being fought in South Korea, and secondly questioned the legitimacy and effectiveness of Truman’s loyalty program, signed into effect by Executive Order 9835 in 1947. This program required the FBI to run checks on almost anyone involved in the U.S. government and subsequently to launch investigations into any government employee with what could be presumed as questionable political associations. The Loyalty Program was not enough to satisfy Senator McCarthy, who suspected that a number of subversives had slipped through the investigation and remained in the State Department. President Truman made it clear that he would not take McCarthy’s accusations seriously and that the Senator was “the best asset the Kremlin has.”109 July 12, 1950 The President The White House Washington, D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cold War
    The American Yawp Chapter 25 – The Cold War Quiz 1. What was the first military action taken by the United States against international communism? a. American soldiers fought against the Red Army during the Russian civil war b. American soldiers fought isolated battles against the Soviet Union during World War II c. The Berlin Airlift d. The Korean War 2. Greece and Turkey were early flashpoints in the Cold War. How did the United States respond to unrest in Greece and Turkey in 1947? a. The United States established long range missiles in these nations, capable of reaching Moscow b. The United States sent military advisers to train anti-communist forces in both countries c. The United States actively intervened in Greece but not in Turkey d. The United States sent $400 million to both nations to be used in resisting communism 3. What was the purpose of the Marshall Plan? a. Rebuild Western Europe b. Create new markets for American goods c. Generate support for Capitalist democracies d. All of the above 4. When was the Atlantic Charter issued? a. After World War I b. Before the United States entered World War II c. After World War II d. When the Soviet Union invaded Korea 5. What was the message of NSC-68? a. A warning that the idea of the domino theory may represent a slippery slope commitment that would result in dozens of new wars b. An economic argument for isolationism c. A call for a tripling of the annual defense budget for the purpose of stopping communism d.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dangerous Rise of Populism Global Attacks on Human Rights Values
    The Dangerous Rise of Populism Global Attacks on Human Rights Values By Kenneth Roth, Executive Director, Human Rights Watch Human rights exist to protect people from government abuse and neglect. Rights limit what a state can do and impose obligations for how a state must act. Yet today a new generation of populists is turning this protection on its head. Claiming to speak for “the people,” they treat rights as an impediment to their conception of the majority will, a needless obstacle to defending the nation from perceived threats and evils. Instead of accepting rights as protecting everyone, they privilege the declared interests of the majority, encouraging people to adopt the dangerous belief that they will never themselves need to assert rights against an overreaching government claiming to act in their name. The appeal of the populists has grown with mounting public discontent over the status quo. In the West, many people feel left behind by technological change, the global economy, and growing inequality. Horrific incidents of terrorism generate apprehension and fear. Some are uneasy with societies that have become more ethnically, religiously and racially diverse. There is an increasing sense that governments and the elite ignore public concerns. In this cauldron of discontent, certain politicians are flourishing and even gaining power by portraying rights as protecting only the terrorist suspect or the asylum seeker at the expense of the safety, economic welfare, and cultural preferences of the presumed majority. They scapegoat refugees, immigrant communities, and minorities. Truth is a frequent casualty. Nativism, xenophobia, racism, and Islamophobia are on the rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Joe Mccarthy and the Red Scare
    Joe McCarthy and the Red Scare "We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. We must remember always that accusation is not proof and that conviction depends upon evidence and due process of law. We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason, if we dig deep in our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not descended from fearful men--not from men who feared to write, to speak, to associate and to defend causes that were, for the moment, unpopular." ~Edward R. Murrow Overview In this lesson, students will study the effects of the actions of Joseph McCarthy and the Red Scare on American life in the 1950’s. During the warm up, students will be set up to replicate the actions of Senator McCarthy by accusing particular people of being communist, with no information other than a picture. Students will then receive an overview of the First Red Scare, as well as gain an understanding of the foreign and domestic reasons for the Second Red Scare, via an interactive Power Point presentation. The lesson culminates with students creating television commercials and campaign posters supporting or opposing the reelection of Senator Joe McCarthy. Grade 11 NC Essential Standards for American History II • AH2.H.1.2- Use Historical comprehension… • AH2.H.1.3- Use historical analysis and interpretation… • AH2.H.1.4- Use historical research… • AH2.H.2.1 - Analyze key political, economic, and social turning points since the end of Reconstruction in terms of causes and effects (e.g., conflicts, legislation, elections, innovations, leadership, movements, Supreme Court decisions, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Academic American History
    CORE BODY OF KNOWLEDGE HONORS AMERICAN HISTORY For each of the sections that follow students may be required to analyze, recall, explain, interpret, apply, or evaluate the particular concepts being taught. MODERN AMERICA EMERGES – 1890-1920 • Describe the causes and the effects of the Spanish-American War and its impact on U.S. Imperialism • Summarize how in the first tow decades of the 1900’s, Americans embraced the Progressive movement and many of its reforms. • Give examples of progressive reform at the urban, state and federal levels • Describe the long campaign and great effort required to achieve women’s suffrage • Identify World War I as a conflict of global origins and dimensions • Describe President Wilson’s efforts to fashion a lasting peace after World War I AMERICA IN THE 1920’S • Describe the new prosperity and conveniences produced by American businesses • Examine why Americans lash out at those who are different throughout the decade • Assess the reasons for the clash between rural America and a faster paced urban culture • Describe the influence of mass media on women’s attitudes and roles • Assess the conservative lasses-faire political philosophy that characterized the presidencies of Harding, Coolidge and Hoover THE GREAT DEPRESSION • Assess the factors that cause an economic collapse in 1929 • Examine why millions of Americans lose their jobs and President Hoover is unable to end the downslide • Summarize President Roosevelt’s New Deal program • Analyze the legacy of the Great Depression and Roosevelt’s New Deal WORLD WAR II AND THE HOME FRONT • Identify the aggressive nations of Europe and Asia and their leaders • Identify Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor as the aggressive action that propelled the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccarthyism Lesson Plan
    Joe McCarthy and the Red Scare "We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. We must remember always that accusation is not proof and that conviction depends upon evidence and due process of law. We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason, if we dig deep in our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not descended from fearful men--not from men who feared to write, to speak, to associate and to defend causes that were, for the moment, unpopular." ~Edward R. Murrow Overview In this lesson, students will study the effects of the actions of Joseph McCarthy and the Red Scare on American life in the 1950’s. During the warm up, students will be set up to replicate the actions of Senator McCarthy by accusing particular people of being communist, with no information other than a picture. Students will then receive an overview of the First Red Scare, as well as gain an understanding of the foreign and domestic reasons for the Second Red Scare, via an interactive Power Point presentation. The lesson culminates with students creating television commercials and campaign posters supporting or opposing the reelection of Senator Joe McCarthy. Grade 11 NC Essential Standards for American History II AH2.H.1.2- Use Historical comprehension… AH2.H.1.3- Use historical analysis and interpretation… AH2.H.1.4- Use historical research… AH2.H.2.1 - Analyze key political, economic, and social turning points since the end of Reconstruction in terms of causes and effects (e.g., conflicts, legislation, elections, innovations, leadership, movements, Supreme Court decisions, etc.).
    [Show full text]