Hook Norton (April 2020) • Social History

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hook Norton (April 2020) • Social History VCH Oxfordshire • Texts in Progress • Hook Norton (April 2020) • Social History. • p. 1 VCH Oxfordshire Texts in Progress HOOK NORTON Social History Social Character and Communal Life Until the 19th century Hook Norton parish supported a predominantly agricultural community living mainly in the village and the adjacent hamlet of Southrop. In the 17th and 18th centuries divided landownership, the lack of a resident major landowner, and weak Anglican leadership contributed to the development of Protestant Nonconformity and a largely independent body of farmers. By the early 19th century Hook Norton was a classic ‘open’ village with a lively craft sector and a high level of pauper immigration. The building of the railway in the late 19th century brought a temporary influx of navvies, but the 20th century saw the usual reduction of local employment, including in agriculture and crafts. After c.1950 (and the closure of the Brymbo ironworks) many local people worked outside the parish, and by the early 21st century the population was based around commuters and retirees. Hook Norton village, viewed from the church tower c.1900. VCH Oxfordshire • Texts in Progress • Hook Norton (April 2020) • Social History. • p. 2 The Middle Ages Hook Norton was one of the hundred’s largest rural settlements, although not one of its richest.1 From an early date Southrop was regarded as a separate settlement, and was taxed with Swerford rather than Hook Norton.2 Social stratification amongst inhabitants was reflected through holding size and also types of tenure.3 In 1086 there were numerous villani and a few lower-status bordars and slaves,4 and free tenants were present by the late 12th century (if not earlier).5 By that time Hook Norton attracted incomers from surrounding rural settlements,6 as well as from more distant places including Ireland, Wales and Scotland.7 In 1210 a Jew called Isaac was resident, and later in the century a Burford Jew owned property in the parish.8 In the 13th century leading free tenants, who held substantial holdings for low rents, included members of the Charlton and Heronville families,9 the Charltons being amongst the highest taxpayers in the early 14th century.10 On the two main manors some 37 villeins held full yardlands (for fairly heavy services).11 Of the 63 Hook Norton taxpayers in 1316, six paid over 4s., 15 paid 3s.−3s. 10d., 19 paid 2s.−2s. 10d., and the rest 8d.−1s. 10d.12 Twenty-odd cottagers were probably too poor to pay tax, although they were not burdened by labour services.13 A certain amount of social zoning within the settlement is suggested by the fact that at least one free tenant lived outside of the core part of the village (‘above the town’),14 and by the presence of a cottager’s quarter.15 The d’Oilly family were closely involved in local affairs, Hook Norton being the caput of their honor. By the 13th century their political influence had declined, but continuing grass roots power was demonstrated c.1230 when Henry d’Oilly persuaded Osney abbey to remit 1 Oxon. Atlas, 52−5. 2 e.g. Oxon. Eyre, 1241, 151, 167; TNA, E 179/161/8, rot. 3 m. 2; E 179/161/9, rot. 1; E 179/161/170, rot. 4d. 3 Above, econ. hist. 4 DB, f. 158. 5 Ibid. 6 e.g. Oseney Cart. IV, pp. 282 (Peter of Tackley), 283 (Peter de Sibford and Walter de Dunthrop), both dated c.1235; Rot. Hund. II, 726 (Ric. of Swalcliffe). 7 Oseney Cart. IV, pp. 257, 274−6. The surname ‘Scot’ may have given rise to the name Scotland End, for which: above, landscape. 8 Oseney Cart. IV, pp. 274, 286, 287−8. 9 Above, landownership; econ. hist.; Oseney Cart. IV, pp. 259−61, 264−6; Cur. Reg. XV, 40−1; Dickins, A History of Hook Norton, 39. 10 TNA, E 179/161/10, rot. 10d.; E 179/161/8, rot. 3 m. 2; E 179/161/9, rot. 1. 11 Rot. Hund. II, 726; TNA, C 133/101/7, m. 2. 12 Ibid. E 179/161/8, rot. 3 m. 2. 13 None of the cottagers on the Plescy manor in 1301 were taxpayers in 1306: TNA, C 133/101/7, m. 2; E 179/161/10, rot. 10d. 14 Rot. Hund. II, 726 (Thos. Bovetun). 15 Above, settlement. For ‘Cotmannesforlong’ (c.1260): Oseney Cart. IV, p. 281. VCH Oxfordshire • Texts in Progress • Hook Norton (April 2020) • Social History. • p. 3 services due from one of its widowed tenants.16 The lordship of their successors the Plescy family was diluted by the creation of substantial dower portions, although one of Sir Hugh de Plescy’s wives, Isabel (d. before 1279), was commemorated by a memorial in the church.17 In 1299 the abbot of Osney alleged that Hugh de Plescy and a ‘multitude’ of followers had plundered several of his Oxfordshire properties, taking his corn at Hook Norton.18 Lordly rivalry was again evident in 1353, when Richard de Stonelegh accused members of the Dimmock family, Henry Charlton, and others of assaulting his servants, firing his houses, and hunting in his warren, so that he and his household fled ‘for fear of death’, leaving his lands untilled ‘for a great time’.19 The late 14th and 15th century were characterised, as elsewhere, by a rapid turnover of tenants, although up to half a dozen families were present in both 1327 and 1524, including the Turbots, Newmans, Richards, and Charltons.20 The number of free tenants apparently increased before 1361,21 and by the 15th century more substantial tenants included Richard Fulwell, a husbandman who in 1435 had allegedly contracted an 8 mark debt,22 and John Bishop (d. 1497), formerly commemorated by a brass in the church.23 One or two leading villagers were notably well connected perhaps at least partly through the wool trade. Of the two inhabitants admitted to Stratford-upon-Avon’s holy cross guild the second (in 1493) was John Hall, apparently the man of that name who died in 1520 and who owned a house in Banbury and made a bequest to the Oxford friars.24 In 1524 John Croker was assessed on goods worth £43, and Thomas Parr and John Holloway on £20. Three others were assessed on goods worth £10−£14, and the rest on goods under £10 (mainly £2−3) or wages of £1−£2.25 c.1535−1800 Hook Norton flourished in the 16th and 17th centuries.26 Its substantial population, social mix and lack of resident lord made it a lively settlement probably (as later) with a strong sense of independent identity. These characteristics, and its rather isolated setting away from the 16 Ibid. p. 262. 17 Peerage, X, 548, 549 n.; Par. Colln, 180; H. Haines, A Manual of Monumental Brasses... (1861), 176; Brooks, Pevsner N&W, 360; VCH fieldwork, 2019. 18 Cal. Pat. 1292−1301, 475. 19 Cal. Pat. 1350−4, 517−18. 20 TNA, E 179/161/9, rot. 1; E 179/161/170, rot. 2d. 21 Above, econ. hist. 22 Cal. Pat. 1429−46, 435. 23 Haines, A Manual of Monumental Brasses... 248. 24 TNA, PROB 11/19/356; M. Macdonald, The Register of the Guild of the Holy Cross, St Mary and St John the Baptist, Stratford-upon-Avon, The Dugdale Society, 42 (2007), 359; above, econ. hist. 25 TNA, E 179/161/170, rot. 2d. E 179/161/177, rot. 4 gives Croker’s goods as being worth £64. 26 Above, econ. hist. VCH Oxfordshire • Texts in Progress • Hook Norton (April 2020) • Social History. • p. 4 main road network, may have contributed to its reputation amongst outsiders as a place of boorish rusticity,27 a reputation which played on local pronunciation of the settlement’s name as ‘Hogesnorton’.28 In reality, inhabitants maintained strong connections with local towns as well as with other rural settlements.29 Hook Norton itself had several drinking houses and inns, which acted as social centres alongside the church and (from c.1650) Nonconformist meetings.30 Southrop continued to be identified as a separate hamlet, at least partly because of manorial and agricultural arrangements, despite it being increasingly dwarfed by its neighbour.31 Until the 1660s the Croker family, long-term lessees of the Osney manor and rectory and lords of Dimmocks, supplied the parish’s resident gentry.32 John Croker (d. 1569) secured confirmation of his family arms and a memorial in the church, where he and other family members were buried.33 John’s son Gerard (d. 1578) was sufficiently successful to be knighted.34 Based usually in the rectory house (which was assessed on 13 hearths in 1662),35 the family owned property elsewhere in north Oxfordshire, Gloucestershire, and Warwickshire.36 However, they struggled with heavy debts,37 and their financial problems were exacerbated by disputes over their leasehold interests and finally by supporting the king in the Civil War.38 Other leading families of long standing included the Calcotts,39 one of whom, Walter, was a Staple merchant who established a local charity and bought Williamscot manor in 1559,40 and another, Richard, later married a daughter of the lord of Idbury;41 the Pittams, one of whom became a yeoman of the king’s chamber;42 and, from 27 T. Nash, The Apologie of Pierce Pennilesse (1593), K4; W. Camden, Britain… (1610); Tiller, ‘Hook Norton’, 280. 28 PN Oxon. II, 353−4; Dickins, A History of Hook Norton, 193−4. 29 Above, econ. hist. 30 Above, econ. hist.; below, relig. hist. 31 OHC, MS Oxf. Dioc.
Recommended publications
  • Post-Medieval and Modern Resource Assessment
    THE SOLENT THAMES RESEARCH FRAMEWORK RESOURCE ASSESSMENT POST-MEDIEVAL AND MODERN PERIOD (AD 1540 - ) Jill Hind April 2010 (County contributions by Vicky Basford, Owen Cambridge, Brian Giggins, David Green, David Hopkins, John Rhodes, and Chris Welch; palaeoenvironmental contribution by Mike Allen) Introduction The period from 1540 to the present encompasses a vast amount of change to society, stretching as it does from the end of the feudal medieval system to a multi-cultural, globally oriented state, which increasingly depends on the use of Information Technology. This transition has been punctuated by the protestant reformation of the 16th century, conflicts over religion and power structure, including regicide in the 17th century, the Industrial and Agricultural revolutions of the 18th and early 19th century and a series of major wars. Although land battles have not taken place on British soil since the 18th century, setting aside terrorism, civilians have become increasingly involved in these wars. The period has also seen the development of capitalism, with Britain leading the Industrial Revolution and becoming a major trading nation. Trade was followed by colonisation and by the second half of the 19th century the British Empire included vast areas across the world, despite the independence of the United States in 1783. The second half of the 20th century saw the end of imperialism. London became a centre of global importance as a result of trade and empire, but has maintained its status as a financial centre. The Solent Thames region generally is prosperous, benefiting from relative proximity to London and good communications routes. The Isle of Wight has its own particular issues, but has never been completely isolated from major events.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxfordshire Local History News
    Oxford Local History Association Newsletter Issue 131 -- Summer 2015 OXFORDSHIRE LOCAL HISTORY NEWS The Newsletter of the Oxfordshire Local History Association Issue 131 Summer 2015 ISSN 1465-4695 Chairman's Musings On the right tracks? To accommodate overhead wiring on the London to Bristol line, our low Almost two centuries have passed since the first loading gauge has passenger railway was built in the Thames Valley, yet necessitated lowering the today trains are making big news in and around railway tracks in some Oxfordshire. places, notably the famous Box Tunnel near Bath, The controversy over HS2, the proposed high-speed thus creating dips in the line from London to the West Midlands, which would line. This would have been run close to Oxfordshire’s northeast border, continues anathema to the Great unabated. Just over the county’s southern border, - Reading station has been thoroughly modernised and Western’s Victorian engin eer, Isambard Kingdom expanded. Apart from the lines already running in five Brunel, who prided himself on the exceptionally flat directions from Reading, it will soon be possible to catch a Crossrail train from there to the far side of course of his “billiard table” through the Vale of White Horse. London without the need to change trains. Direct rail services from Reading to Heathrow Airport are also More often, though, the solution to the low loading promised. gauge problem has been to maintain existing gradients and instead raise the road bridges that cross the Within Oxfordshire itself, things are also on the move. railway. This has caused immense disruption when Didcot station has recently had a revamp, with much- Oxfordshire roads such as the A417 at Challow Station improved parking and road vehicle access.
    [Show full text]
  • Scheduled Monuments in Oxfordshire Eclited by D
    Scheduled Monuments in Oxfordshire Eclited by D. B. HARDEN HE Council for British Archaeology has recently issued the second eclition T of its J1emorandum on the Ancient Monuments Acts of 1913, 1931 and 1953.' This pamphlet explains in brief terms the provisions of the Acts and the machinery instituted by the Ministry of Works for operating them. It con­ tains also a list of local correspondents of the Mjnistry of Works, county by county, through whom reports and information about ancient monuments in the counties may be forwarded to the Ancient Monuments Department of the Ministry for action by the Chief Inspector of Ancient Monuments and his staff'. The information contained in the pamphlet is so important and so lucidly set out that the Committee has reacliJy acceded to a request from the Council for British Archaeology that its substance should be reprinted here. It is hoped that aJl members of the Society will make themselves familiar with the facts it provides, and be ready to keep the necessary watch on ancient monu­ ments in their area whether scheduled or not scheduled. Any actual or impend­ ing destruction or damage should be reported without delay either to the Cbief Inspector of Ancient Monuments or to the Ministry's Local Correspondent in the county in which the monument lies. (A list of the correspondents for Oxfordshire and neighbouring counties is given in Appendix I.) Special watch should, of course, be kept on monuments already scheduled, which are, for the very reason that they are scheduled, to be presumed to be amongst the most important ancient remains in the clistrict.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebbsfleet Style
    261 Chapter 17 The Post-Medieval and Modern Period (AD 1540 onwards): Resource Assessment by Jill Hind Introduction hamshire too was changed by the creation of the Milton Keynes Unitary Authority. Portsmouth and The period from 1540 to the present encompasses a vast Southampton are also now Unitary Authorities. amount of change to society, stretching as it does from the end of the feudal medieval system to a multicultural, globally oriented state, which increasingly depends on Inheritance the use of Information Technology. This transition has been punctuated by the protestant reformation of the This period begins in c. 1540 when Henry VIII was 16th century, conflicts over religion and power carrying out his reformation of the Church of England structure, including regicide in the 17th century, the and following the dissolution of the monasteries in Industrial and Agricultural revolutions of the 18th and 1536-39. The Church had been a major landowner in early 19th century and a series of major wars. Although the Solent-Thames region. The change to secular land battles have not taken place on British soil since the ownership initially had little impact on the pattern of 18th century, setting aside terrorism, civilians have settlement and land use that existed in the mid 16th become increasingly involved in these wars. century, although those areas that had been directly The period has also seen the development of capit - farmed as part of monastic estates naturally saw some alism, with Britain leading the Industrial Revolution and change as a result. becoming a major trading nation. Trade was followed by A bigger change was the deliberate slighting of former colonisation and by the second half of the 19th century monastic buildings, many of which were plundered for the British Empire included vast areas across the world, their materials or converted to new (usually domestic) despite the independence of the United States in 1783.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDIEVAL PA VINGTILES in BUCKINGHAM SHIRE LTS'l's F J
    99 MEDIEVAL PAVINGTILES IN BUCKINGHAM SHIRE By CHRISTOPHER HOHLE.R ( c ncluded). LT S'l'S F J ESI NS. (Where illuslratio ns of the designs were given m the last issue of the R rt•ord.t, Lit e umnlJ er o f the page where they will LJc found is give11 in tl te margi n). LIST I. TILES FROM ELSEWHERE, NOW PRESERVED IN BUCKINGHAM SHIRE S/1 Circular tile representing Duke Morgan (fragment). Shurlock no. 10. Little Kimble church. S/2 Circular tile representing Tnstan slaying Morhaut. Shurlock no. 13. Little Kimble church. S/3 Circular tile representing Tristan attacking (a dragon). Shurlock no. 17. Little Kimble church. S/4 Circular tile representing Garmon accepting the gage. Shurlock no. 21. Little Kimble church. S/5 Circular tile representing Tristan's father receiving a message. Shurlock no. 32. Little Kimble church. S/6 Border tile with grotesques. Shurlock no. 39. Little Kimble church. S/7 Border tile with inscription: + E :SAS :GOVERNAIL. Little Kimble church (fragment also from "The Vine," Little Kimble). S/8 Wall-tiles (fragmentary) representing an archbishop, a queen, S/9 and a king trampling on their foes. S/10 Shurlock frontispiece. Little Kimble church (fragment of S/10 from "The Vine"). Nos. S/1-10 all from Ohertsey Abbey, Surrey ( ?). S/11 Border tile representing a squirrel. Wilts. Arch. Mag. vol. XXXVIII. Bucks Museum, Aylesbury, as from Bletchley. No. S/11 is presumably from Malmesbury Abbey. LIST II. "LATE WESSEX" TILES in BUCKINGHAMSHIRE p. 43 W /1 The Royal. arms in a circle. Bucks.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Urban Character Area 2: Osney Island - Oseney Abbey
    OXFORD HISTORIC URBAN CHARACTER ASSESSMENT HISTORIC URBAN CHARACTER AREA 2: OSNEY ISLAND - OSENEY ABBEY The HUCA is located within broad character Zone A: Osney Island This broad character zone comprises of the bulk of Osney Island, a sub oval Island which formed by two channels of the Thames River (the parish of St Thomas and land to the north, although also part of Osney, has been separated into a different zone). This part of Osney consists of Victorian and 20th century development around the railway and the site of medieval Oseney Abbey. Summary characteristics • Dominant period: 20th century. • Designations: Osney Abbey Scheduled Ancient Monument; Two Grade II listings; Osney Island Conservation Area. • Archaeological Potential: Previous archaeological investigation has demonstrated good preservation in this area which includes most of the precinct of medieval Oseney Abbey, Osney Mill, the mill stream and the 19th century Osney cemetery. • Character: Mixed modern industrial units, boatyard and residential development with medieval abbey building, converted post-medieval mill and Victorian lock cottage. • Spaces: There is a low density of development with sizable areas of green space; the cemetery, the lawned court at Gibbs Crescent and a strip of grass along the mill island. • Road morphology: irregular modern roads, mostly private access. • Plot morphology: large irregular plots. • The natural topography of the Area is flat and low-lying at a height of 56m to 57m OD. • Survival of townscape elements: o Medieval building and archway from Oseney Abbey. o Post-medieval converted mill. o Osney Mill Stream. th o 20 century marina and boatyard. th o Late 19 century walled cemetery.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hundred Outside the North Gate of Oxford
    The Hundred Outside the North Gate of Oxford By HELEN M. CAM HE controversiesl as to the origin of hundreds are ancient and familiar. T The ambiguities in the use of the term, at the period when the hundred was a well established and indispensable governmental district, that is, from the eleventh to the sixteenth century, are less familiar. It is possible to distinguish at least four different senses in which the word is used during this period. The best known and the most important is the administrative hundred of royal government. The district that paid the murdrum fine, furnished a jury of presentment for the eyre, contributed its quota of primitively equipped soldiers to the posse comitatus, figured with its neighbours in the sheriff's accounts as making up the items of the farm of the shire, and sent its residents twice a year to the sheriff's tourn held at its traditional meeting-place, can be located on the map as early as 1086 in some counties (though not in Oxfordshire), and in most cases before 1200; and the boundaries traceable by that date are in most cases not materially modified after that date. Whether in private hands or under the sheriff's subordinates, this hundred can be confidently handled, for the king's government had fixed the pattern, and the uniform action of the central administration standardised its character. Outside this official list of hundreds the ambiguities begin. Liebermann2 says that in the eleventh century the word may be used to denote any public tribunal, and possibly private jurisdictions also.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 What to See at Christ Church
    What to See at Christ Church : A Short Tour Christ Church is an essential element in any visit to Oxford. Two of its famous landmarks, Tom Tower, by Christopher Wren, and Oxford’s Cathedral spire, define the city’s celebrated skyline and mark Christ Church as a unique dual foundation: one of Oxford University's largest colleges and the cathedral church for the diocese of Oxford. The following tour will provide those visiting Christ Church with more information about its community and history. Beginning in the tranquil landscape of Christ Church Meadow, the tour will move through the college in the footsteps of great minds, royalty, poets, prime ministers, a little girl called Alice and even the odd wizard! Gaze upon the beautiful buildings, elegant quadrangles and vibrant stained glass windows and gain an insight into the rich history of an Oxford college and cathedral. The tour has been designed to accompany a visit to Christ Church but if you should need more information feel free to approach the bowler-hatted custodians or one of the cathedral stewards with any queries that should arise. The Meadow Christ Church Meadow is a rare open space at the heart of Oxford, open to the public all year round. Though seemingly tranquil, the meadow is highly variable, with seasonal flooding and a variety of wildlife that comes and goes. During the Civil War it proved invaluable as a defence against the Parliamentarian forces, but visitors are nowadays more likely to encounter a rare English Longhorn cow than a soldier besieging the city. The meadow has long been used as a site for sport, entertainment and recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford, St George's
    27 JULY 2018 OXFORD, ST GEORGE’S 1 actswilliam2henry1.wordpress.com Release date Version notes Who Current version: H1-Oxford St George-2018-1 27/7/2018 Original version RS/DXC Previous versions: — — — — This text is made available through the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs License; additional terms may apply Authors for attribution statement: Charters of William II and Henry I Project Richard Sharpe, Faculty of History, University of Oxford David X Carpenter, Faculty of History, University of Oxford OXFORD, ST GEORGE’S Collegiate church of St George in Oxford Castle; archive of Osney abbey County of Oxford : Diocese of Lincoln Founded in late eleventh century The church of St George in the castle at Oxford began as a house of secular canons. What is always said about its origins depends wholly on statements in annals of Osney abbey, which, when still a priory, took over the college. Here we are told that Robert d’Oilly built the castle in 1071 and founded St George’s church in 1074, and also that Osney priory was founded by Robert II d’Oilly (nephew of the first), in 1129 (Osney Annals, Annales monastici, iv. 9–10, 19; Salter, Ctl. Oseney, iv. 1, 11). In 1149 the same Robert II d’Oilly and one Geoffrey d’Ivry, the narrative says, gave the church to the canons of Osney (Annales monastici, iv. 26; Salter, Ctl. Oseney, iv. 24). The names of the patrons who made this gift and the year are contradicted by charters of the Empress Matilda and of King Stephen, but they represent the level of falsehood in the history invented for Osney.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Hidden Heritage
    HIDDEN HERITAGE: WALK 2 - ST EBBE'S & ST THOMAS' Continue past the City of Oxford College building (where you reach the sign for 'City Centre') Walk along the footpath until the fork in the watercourse Leave Bonn Square (OX1 1EU) past the entrance to New Road Do not cross the footbridge on the left but follow the route to Baptist Church to New Road 10 the right through to the City Centre Cross New Road Turn right into Paradise Street 1 Note the Courthouse on the left Cross Castle Street and climb the steps up Church Lane . It is recorded that the last public execution took place here in 1863. Before taking the escalator down on the right, look up at the mosaic At the bottom of the escalator, turn left across Greyfriars Place into Turn Again Lane Turn left to the Old Prison (now Malmaison Hotel) along Justice Walk Turn right into Castle Yard This is where the Oxford Preservation Trust offices are located. Pass the old Castle Mound on the south side 11 2 Walk past the entrance to Oxford Castle & Prison Note the 17th-century houses on the left Turn left into Littlegate Street Turn left into Mill Stream Walk Walk onto the bridge over Castle Mill Stream Turn into Brewer Street on your right noting to the north the wall of Pembroke 3 You will soon see the Castle Tower and walls College that is part of the medieval walls 12 Walk under the glass bridge At the road junction, the bridge on the left is called 'Quaking Bridge' This was built in 2012 and has been nicknamed the 'Bridge of Thighs'.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography Sources for Further Reading May 2011 National Trust Bibliography
    Bibliography Sources for further reading May 2011 National Trust Bibliography Introduction Over many years a great deal has been published about the properties and collections in the care of the National Trust, yet to date no single record of those publications has been established. The following Bibliography is a first attempt to do just that, and provides a starting point for those who want to learn more about the properties and collections in the National Trust’s care. Inevitably this list will have gaps in it. Do please let us know of additional material that you feel might be included, or where you have spotted errors in the existing entries. All feedback to [email protected] would be very welcome. Please note the Bibliography does not include minor references within large reference works, such as the Encyclopaedia Britannica, or to guidebooks published by the National Trust. How to use The Bibliography is arranged by property, and then alphabetically by author. For ease of use, clicking on a hyperlink will take you from a property name listed on the Contents Page to the page for that property. ‘Return to Contents’ hyperlinks will take you back to the contents page. To search by particular terms, such as author or a theme, please make use of the ‘Find’ function, in the ‘Edit’ menu (or use the keyboard shortcut ‘[Ctrl] + [F]’). Locating copies of books, journals or specific articles Most of the books, and some journals and magazines, can of course be found in any good library. For access to rarer titles a visit to one of the country’s copyright libraries may be necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • July Chronicle
    Are you listening? For the past seven years, leaders of the Along with prayer, read the Bible. The parish have been meeting to discern Bible is God's word to you. Within its God’s will for us. I remember the very pages God speaks about His will for you. first year when we asked, “Why are we So read it and pray as you read it, “Lord, here? What on earth are we doing for show me your will.” Be self-aware: heaven’s sake? Why are we here? know your strengths and weaknesses What is our purpose?” As we began the well enough that you are able to sense day a lot of people said, “What do you the gifts that God has given you and that mean by asking what our purpose is? He is calling you to use. We’re the church. We don’t need a The next step can be difficult for some of purpose, we just need to be the church.” us. Listen. Remember, God gave you Over the years we had such adventures two ears and one mouth. So find exploring what God is calling his church somewhere quiet where you can sit and to do and be. In fact, for me, these spend time in your own thoughts. Pay meetings are among the highest points attention, because in the midst of it you of the year. I’m always excited to listen might sense something from God. to what people have to say about what When you do, write it down.
    [Show full text]