DOCSLIB.ORG

Assured Produce Crop Specific Protocol PARSNIPS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assured Produce Crop Specific Protocol PARSNIPS Assured Produce Crop Specific Protocol PARSNIPS (CROP ID: 50) January 2006 Crop Specific Protocol - Parsnips ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..............................................................................................................5 Preface..................................................................................................................................5 Disclaimer and trade mark acknowledgement .....................................................................5 1 General introduction 7 2 Planning and records 8 3 Site Selection 8 3.1 Site history ..................................................................................................................8 3.2 Crop rotation...............................................................................................................8 4 Site management 8 4.1 Soil mapping...............................................................................................................8 4.2 Soil management.........................................................................................................8 4.3 Soil fumigation ...........................................................................................................9 4.4 Substrates....................................................................................................................9 4.5 Drilling and transplanting ...........................................................................................9 4.6 Growing systems.........................................................................................................9 4.6.1 Early crops ......................................................................................................9 4.6.2 Main season and late crops ...........................................................................10 5 Variety Selection 11 6 Nutrition 11 6.1 Nutrient requirement.................................................................................................11 7 Irrigation 12 8 Crop protection 13 8.1 The basic approach to crop protection ......................................................................13 8.2 Plant protection product choice ................................................................................14 8.3 Advice on the use of pesticides.................................................................................14 8.4 Application of pesticides ..........................................................................................15 8.5 Records of application ..............................................................................................15 8.6 Protective clothing/equipment ..................................................................................15 8.7 Pesticide storage........................................................................................................15 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, Assured Produce does not accept any responsibility for errors and omissions. 2006 Assured Produce. 3 Control Document No: 00038/06 Crop Specific Protocol - Parsnips ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 8.8 Empty pesticide containers .......................................................................................15 8.9 Pesticide residues in fresh produce...........................................................................15 8.10 Pest, disease and weed control..................................................................................15 8.10.1 Pest control .................................................................................................16 8.10.1.1 Nematodes ..................................................................................................16 8.10.1.2 Carrot fly.....................................................................................................16 8.10.1.3 Aphids ........................................................................................................18 8.10.1.4 Cutworm.....................................................................................................19 8.10.1.5 Red Spider Mite..........................................................................................19 8.10.2 Disease control ...........................................................................................19 8.10.2.1 Seedling diseases........................................................................................19 8.10.2.2 Root diseases ..............................................................................................20 8.10.2.3 Foliar diseases ............................................................................................22 Downy Mildew .........................................................................................................22 Phoma 22 8.10.3 Weed control...............................................................................................24 9 Harvesting and preparation for market 25 9.1 Hygiene.....................................................................................................................25 9.2 Post harvest treatments .............................................................................................25 9.3 Post harvest washing ................................................................................................25 9.4 Harvesting.................................................................................................................26 10 Pollution control and waste management 27 11 Energy efficiency 27 12 Health & Safety 27 13 Conservation issues 27 Appendix 1 Typical application rates for nutrients (kg/ha) ...................................................................28 Appendix 2 Insecticides currently approved for use on Parsnips ..........................................................29 Appendix 3 Fungicides currently approved for use on Parsnips............................................................31 Appendix 4 Herbicides currently approved for use on Parsnips............................................................33 Appendix 5 Seed treatments currently approved for use on Parsnips....................................................37 Appendix 6 Pest control currently approved for use on Parsnips..........................................................38 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, Assured Produce does not accept any responsibility for errors and omissions. 4 2006 Assured Produce. Control Document No: 00038/06 Crop Specific Protocol - Parsnips ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Appendix 7 Growth suppressant currently approved for use on Parsnips ............................................38 Appendix 8 Guidelines on minimising pesticide residues .....................................................................39 Appendix 9 Control Points: Parsnips.....................................................................................................40 Acknowledgements Assured Produce and members of the NFU-Retailer ICM Partnership gratefully acknowledge the contribution of all consultees in the preparation of this protocol, particularly members of the British Carrot Growers Association, Peter Wright from Peter Wright Consultancy Services and Carey Greenacre from Agronomy and Consultancy Services Preface This crop specific protocol has been written to complement and avoid duplicating the generic principles of the scheme and appendices. It is advisable to read the Assured Produce Generic Crop Protocol Standards and the Assured Produce Generic Protocol Guidance Notes (referred to in this document as the Generic Standards and Generic Guidance Notes) first before reading this crop specific protocol. This protocol is designed to stimulate thought in the mind of the reader. This crop specific protocol contains crop specific parameters and guidance, where applicable, for the requirements stated in the Generic Standards. All statements in this protocol containing the words "strongly recommended" (in bold type) will be verified during the Assured Produce assessment and their compliance will form a part of the certification/approval decision. The score required for these "strongly recommended" control points can be found on the final page of this document and in the checklists produced by Assured Produce licensed certification bodies. Disclaimer and trade mark acknowledgement Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, Assured Produce does not accept any responsibility for errors and omissions. Trade names are only used in this protocol where use of that specific product is essential. All such products are annotated ® and all trademark rights are hereby acknowledged. Notes: EC Review: Major withdrawal of pesticide products All pesticide information quoted in this Crop Specific protocol was last updated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Many Fungi Make Sclerotia?
    fungal ecology xxx (2014) 1e10 available at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/funeco Short Communication How many fungi make sclerotia? Matthew E. SMITHa,*, Terry W. HENKELb, Jeffrey A. ROLLINSa aUniversity of Florida, Department of Plant Pathology, Gainesville, FL 32611-0680, USA bHumboldt State University of Florida, Department of Biological Sciences, Arcata, CA 95521, USA article info abstract Article history: Most fungi produce some type of durable microscopic structure such as a spore that is Received 25 April 2014 important for dispersal and/or survival under adverse conditions, but many species also Revision received 23 July 2014 produce dense aggregations of tissue called sclerotia. These structures help fungi to survive Accepted 28 July 2014 challenging conditions such as freezing, desiccation, microbial attack, or the absence of a Available online - host. During studies of hypogeous fungi we encountered morphologically distinct sclerotia Corresponding editor: in nature that were not linked with a known fungus. These observations suggested that Dr. Jean Lodge many unrelated fungi with diverse trophic modes may form sclerotia, but that these structures have been overlooked. To identify the phylogenetic affiliations and trophic Keywords: modes of sclerotium-forming fungi, we conducted a literature review and sequenced DNA Chemical defense from fresh sclerotium collections. We found that sclerotium-forming fungi are ecologically Ectomycorrhizal diverse and phylogenetically dispersed among 85 genera in 20 orders of Dikarya, suggesting Plant pathogens that the ability to form sclerotia probably evolved 14 different times in fungi. Saprotrophic ª 2014 Elsevier Ltd and The British Mycological Society. All rights reserved. Sclerotium Fungi are among the most diverse lineages of eukaryotes with features such as a hyphal thallus, non-flagellated cells, and an estimated 5.1 million species (Blackwell, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Mycologist News
    MYCOLOGIST NEWS The newsletter of the British Mycological Society 2012 (4) Edited by Prof. Pieter van West and Dr Anpu Varghese 2013 BMS Council BMS Council and Committee Members 2013 President Prof. Geoffrey D. Robson Vice-President Prof. Bruce Ing President Elect Prof Nick Read Treasurer Prof. Geoff M Gadd Secretary Position vacant Publications Officer Dr. Pieter van West International Initiatives Adviser Prof. AJ Whalley Fungal Biology Research Committee representatives: Dr. Elaine Bignell; Prof Nick Read Fungal Education and Outreach Committee: Dr. Paul S. Dyer; Dr Ali Ashby Field Mycology and Conservation: Dr. Stuart Skeates, Mrs Dinah Griffin Fungal Biology Research Committee Prof. Nick Read (Chair) retiring 31.12. 2013 Dr. Elaine Bignell retiring 31.12. 2013 Dr. Mark Ramsdale retiring 31.12. 2013 Dr. Pieter van West retiring 31.12. 2013 Dr. Sue Crosthwaite retiring 31.12. 2014 Prof. Mick Tuite retiring 31.12. 2014 Dr Alex Brand retiring 31.12. 2015 Fungal Education and Outreach Committee Dr. Paul S. Dyer (Chair and FBR link) retiring 31.12. 2013 Dr. Ali Ashby retiring 31.12. 2013 Ms. Carol Hobart (FMC link) retiring 31.12. 2012 Dr. Sue Assinder retiring 31.12. 2013 Dr. Kay Yeoman retiring 31.12. 2013 Alan Williams retiring 31.12. 2014 Prof Lynne Boddy (Media Liaison) retiring 31.12. 2014 Dr. Elaine Bignell retiring 31.12. 2015 Field Mycology and Conservation Committee Dr. Stuart Skeates (Chair, website & FBR link) retiring 31.12. 2014 Prof Richard Fortey retiring 31.12. 2013 Mrs. Sheila Spence retiring 31.12. 2013 Mrs Dinah Griffin retiring 31.12. 2014 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fungi of Slapton Ley National Nature Reserve and Environs
    THE FUNGI OF SLAPTON LEY NATIONAL NATURE RESERVE AND ENVIRONS APRIL 2019 Image © Visit South Devon ASCOMYCOTA Order Family Name Abrothallales Abrothallaceae Abrothallus microspermus CY (IMI 164972 p.p., 296950), DM (IMI 279667, 279668, 362458), N4 (IMI 251260), Wood (IMI 400386), on thalli of Parmelia caperata and P. perlata. Mainly as the anamorph <it Abrothallus parmeliarum C, CY (IMI 164972), DM (IMI 159809, 159865), F1 (IMI 159892), 2, G2, H, I1 (IMI 188770), J2, N4 (IMI 166730), SV, on thalli of Parmelia carporrhizans, P Abrothallus parmotrematis DM, on Parmelia perlata, 1990, D.L. Hawksworth (IMI 400397, as Vouauxiomyces sp.) Abrothallus suecicus DM (IMI 194098); on apothecia of Ramalina fustigiata with st. conid. Phoma ranalinae Nordin; rare. (L2) Abrothallus usneae (as A. parmeliarum p.p.; L2) Acarosporales Acarosporaceae Acarospora fuscata H, on siliceous slabs (L1); CH, 1996, T. Chester. Polysporina simplex CH, 1996, T. Chester. Sarcogyne regularis CH, 1996, T. Chester; N4, on concrete posts; very rare (L1). Trimmatothelopsis B (IMI 152818), on granite memorial (L1) [EXTINCT] smaragdula Acrospermales Acrospermaceae Acrospermum compressum DM (IMI 194111), I1, S (IMI 18286a), on dead Urtica stems (L2); CY, on Urtica dioica stem, 1995, JLT. Acrospermum graminum I1, on Phragmites debris, 1990, M. Marsden (K). Amphisphaeriales Amphisphaeriaceae Beltraniella pirozynskii D1 (IMI 362071a), on Quercus ilex. Ceratosporium fuscescens I1 (IMI 188771c); J1 (IMI 362085), on dead Ulex stems. (L2) Ceriophora palustris F2 (IMI 186857); on dead Carex puniculata leaves. (L2) Lepteutypa cupressi SV (IMI 184280); on dying Thuja leaves. (L2) Monographella cucumerina (IMI 362759), on Myriophyllum spicatum; DM (IMI 192452); isol. ex vole dung. (L2); (IMI 360147, 360148, 361543, 361544, 361546).
    [Show full text]
  • Weed ID Guide
    GUIDE Cross Sector Weed ID guide 1 Contents Introduction How best to use this pocket guide 2 Weeds as alternative hosts to pests and diseases 3 Importance of weed species in each sector 3 Non-chemical weed control 3 Key features of weeds Key features of weeds to aid identification 4 Broad-leaved weed seedlings 4 Grass weed seedlings 6 Identification groups key Identification groups 1–26 8 Importance of each weed Table 1. Relative importance of each weed in each horticultural sector i Non-chemical weed control Table 2. Ease of non-chemical weed control iv Additional Information Acknowledgements viii 0.A 2 Introduction A pocket guide to aid the identification of the most widespread and economically important weeds encountered in the horticultural sector, this publication covers mostly broad-leaved weeds but also some grasses, moss and liverwort. How best to use this pocket guide This guide is primarily an aid to weed seedling identification to help growers choose the right cultural or herbicidal control method. To correctly identify a weed seedling, first read the section, ‘Key features of weeds’, as this will provide a structured plan of how to approach the identification process. Familiarisation with the various parts of the seedling and checking the key features is essential for correct identification. The weeds are grouped (1–26), by common features of the seedlings, so that this facilitates quicker identification. Each weed has been photographed at three stages of its development: cotyledon, first/second true leaf and mature plant, to allow it to be identified at all stages of growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Manual of Diseases on Garden and Greenhouse Flowers Field Manual of Diseases on Garden and Greenhouse Flowers
    R. Kenneth Horst Field Manual of Diseases on Garden and Greenhouse Flowers Field Manual of Diseases on Garden and Greenhouse Flowers R. Kenneth Horst Field Manual of Diseases on Garden and Greenhouse Flowers R. Kenneth Horst Plant Pathology and Plant Microbe Biology Cornell University Ithaca, NY , USA ISBN 978-94-007-6048-6 ISBN 978-94-007-6049-3 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6049-3 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London Library of Congress Control Number: 2013935122 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, speci fi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on micro fi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied speci fi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Roles of Mycorrhizal Fungi in the Bee Orchid Ophrys Apifera
    Diversity and Roles of Mycorrhizal Fungi in the Bee Orchid Ophrys apifera By Wazeera Rashid Abdullah April 2018 A Thesis submitted to the University of Liverpool in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy Table of Contents Page No. Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. xiv Abbreviations ............................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 2 1 Chapter one: Literature review: ........................................................................................ 3 1.1 Mycorrhiza: .................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.1Arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) or Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza (VAM): ........... 5 1.1.2 Ectomycorrhiza: ...................................................................................................... 5 1.1.3 Ectendomycorrhiza: ................................................................................................ 6 1.1.4 Ericoid mycorrhiza, Arbutoid mycorrhiza, and Monotropoid mycorrhiza: ............ 6 1.1.5 Orchid mycorrhiza: ................................................................................................. 7 1.1.5.1 Orchid mycorrhizal interaction: ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Macromycetes in the Botanical Garden “Jevremovac” in Belgrade
    40 (2): (2016) 249-259 Original Scientific Paper Diversity of macromycetes in the Botanical Garden “Jevremovac” in Belgrade Jelena Vukojević✳, Ibrahim Hadžić, Aleksandar Knežević, Mirjana Stajić, Ivan Milovanović and Jasmina Ćilerdžić Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Takovska 43, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia ABSTRACT: At locations in the outdoor area and in the greenhouse of the Botanical Garden “Jevremovac”, a total of 124 macromycetes species were noted, among which 22 species were recorded for the first time in Serbia. Most of the species belong to the phylum Basidiomycota (113) and only 11 to the phylum Ascomycota. Saprobes are dominant with 81.5%, 45.2% being lignicolous and 36.3% are terricolous. Parasitic species are represented with 13.7% and mycorrhizal species with 4.8%. Inedible species are dominant (70 species), 34 species are edible, five are conditionally edible, eight are poisonous and one is hallucinogenic (Psilocybe cubensis). A significant number of representatives belong to the category of medicinal species. These species have been used for thousands of years in traditional medicine of Far Eastern nations. Current studies confirm and explain knowledge gained by experience and reveal new species which produce biologically active compounds with anti-microbial, antioxidative, genoprotective and anticancer properties. Among species collected in the Botanical Garden “Jevremovac”, those medically significant are: Armillaria mellea, Auricularia auricula.-judae, Laetiporus sulphureus, Pleurotus ostreatus, Schizophyllum commune, Trametes versicolor, Ganoderma applanatum, Flammulina velutipes and Inonotus hispidus. Some of the found species, such as T. versicolor and P. ostreatus, also have the ability to degrade highly toxic phenolic compounds and can be used in ecologically and economically justifiable soil remediation.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of a Basidiomycete Fungus from Stored Sugar Beet Roots
    Mycologia, 104(1), 2012, pp. 70–78. DOI: 10.3852/10-416 # 2012 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Characterization of a Basidiomycete fungus from stored sugar beet roots Takeshi Toda1 sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) harvested from commer- Department of Bioresource Sciences, Akita Prefectural cial fields in 2006 and 2007 in Idaho (USA) after University, Akita, Japan 010-0195 approximately 60 d at 1.7 C under high relative Carl A. Strausbaugh humidity (97–100%) indoors (FIG. 1A, B). Fungal United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural growth continued after the initial observation, and Research Service NWISRL, 3793 N. 3600 E. Kimberly, mycelium extended 15 cm or more from the sugar Idaho 83341-5076 beet roots after 90 d and formed a white crust on the surface of the roots when removed from humid Marianela Rodriguez-Carres environment. Similar observations were made on Marc A. Cubeta roots of sugar beet stored in outdoor piles under Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695-7616 ambient environmental conditions. The presence of the unknown fungus was shown by Strausbaugh et al. (2009) to be correlated with loss of Abstract: Eighteen isolates from sugar beet roots sucrose from stored sugar beet roots, particularly associated with an unknown etiology were character- from roots infected with Beet necrotic yellow vein ized based on observations of morphological charac- virus (BNYVV). For example, when sugar beet roots ters, hyphal growth at 4–28 C, production of phenol were infected with BNYVV and stored in an indoor oxidases and sequence analysis of internal transcribed facility in Paul, Idaho, in 2007 and 2008, 27 and 40% spacer (ITS) and large subunit (LSU) regions of the of the root surface was covered with growth of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA).
    [Show full text]
  • Host Jumps Shaped the Diversity of Extant Rust Fungi (Pucciniales)
    Research Host jumps shaped the diversity of extant rust fungi (Pucciniales) Alistair R. McTaggart1, Roger G. Shivas2, Magriet A. van der Nest3, Jolanda Roux4, Brenda D. Wingfield3 and Michael J. Wingfield1 1Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Tree Protection Co-operative Programme (TPCP), Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Pretoria 0028, South Africa; 2Department of Agriculture and Forestry, Queensland Plant Pathology Herbarium, GPO Box 267, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia; 3Department of Genetics, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Private bag X20, Pretoria 0028, South Africa; 4Department of Plant Sciences, Tree Protection Co-operative Programme (TPCP), Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Pretoria 0028, South Africa Summary Author for correspondence: The aim of this study was to determine the evolutionary time line for rust fungi and date Alistair R. McTaggart key speciation events using a molecular clock. Evidence is provided that supports a contempo- Tel: +2712 420 6714 rary view for a recent origin of rust fungi, with a common ancestor on a flowering plant. Email: [email protected] Divergence times for > 20 genera of rust fungi were studied with Bayesian evolutionary Received: 8 July 2015 analyses. A relaxed molecular clock was applied to ribosomal and mitochondrial genes, cali- Accepted: 26 August 2015 brated against estimated divergence times for the hosts of rust fungi, such as Acacia (Fabaceae), angiosperms and the cupressophytes. New Phytologist (2016) 209: 1149–1158 Results showed that rust fungi shared a most recent common ancestor with a mean age doi: 10.1111/nph.13686 between 113 and 115 million yr.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Monika KOZŁOWSKA, Wiesław MUŁENKO Marcin ANUSIEWICZ, Magda MAMCZARZ
    An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Fungal Biota of the An Annotated Catalogue of the Monika KOZŁOWSKA, Wiesław MUŁENKO Marcin ANUSIEWICZ, Magda MAMCZARZ An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Richness, Diversity and Distribution MARIA CURIE-SkłODOWSKA UNIVERSITY PRESS POLISH BOTANICAL SOCIETY Grzyby_okladka.indd 6 11.02.2019 14:52:24 An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Richness, Diversity and Distribution Monika KOZŁOWSKA, Wiesław MUŁENKO Marcin ANUSIEWICZ, Magda MAMCZARZ An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Richness, Diversity and Distribution MARIA CURIE-SkłODOWSKA UNIVERSITY PRESS POLISH BOTANICAL SOCIETY LUBLIN 2019 REVIEWER Dr hab. Małgorzata Ruszkiewicz-Michalska COVER DESIN, TYPESETTING Studio Format © Te Authors, 2019 © Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press, Lublin 2019 ISBN 978-83-227-9164-6 ISBN 978-83-950171-8-6 ISBN 978-83-950171-9-3 (online) PUBLISHER Polish Botanical Society Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland pbsociety.org.pl Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press 20-031 Lublin, ul. Idziego Radziszewskiego 11 tel. (81) 537 53 04 wydawnictwo.umcs.eu [email protected] Sales Department tel. / fax (81) 537 53 02 Internet bookshop: wydawnictwo.umcs.eu [email protected] PRINTED IN POLAND, by „Elpil”, ul. Artyleryjska 11, 08-110 Siedlce AUTHOR’S AFFILIATION Department of Botany and Mycology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin Monika Kozłowska, [email protected]; Wiesław
    [Show full text]
  • Characterising Plant Pathogen Communities and Their Environmental Drivers at a National Scale
    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Characterising plant pathogen communities and their environmental drivers at a national scale A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Lincoln University by Andreas Makiola Lincoln University, New Zealand 2019 General abstract Plant pathogens play a critical role for global food security, conservation of natural ecosystems and future resilience and sustainability of ecosystem services in general. Thus, it is crucial to understand the large-scale processes that shape plant pathogen communities. The recent drop in DNA sequencing costs offers, for the first time, the opportunity to study multiple plant pathogens simultaneously in their naturally occurring environment effectively at large scale. In this thesis, my aims were (1) to employ next-generation sequencing (NGS) based metabarcoding for the detection and identification of plant pathogens at the ecosystem scale in New Zealand, (2) to characterise plant pathogen communities, and (3) to determine the environmental drivers of these communities. First, I investigated the suitability of NGS for the detection, identification and quantification of plant pathogens using rust fungi as a model system.
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemiology and Control of Violet Root Rot of Carrots
    Pathogens of Fruit and Vegetables 157 EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CONTROL OF VIOLET ROOT ROT OF CARROTS L-H. CHEAH and B.B.C. PAGE New Zealand Institute for Crop & Food Research Limited Private Bag 11 600, Palmerston North, New Zealand ABSTRACT Violet root rot of carrots, caused by Helicobasidium purpureum (anamorph Rhizoctonia crocorum), has caused production losses for many carrot growers in Ohakune over the past three years. During winter, H. purpureum produces thick pinkish mycelial mats covering the soil surface. The pathogen survives winter in these mycelial mats and causes infection in new crops. Three field trials at Ohakune showed that soil fumigation with metam gave some control of the disease. Fumigation with calcium cyanamide and soil incorporation of fungicides were not effective in controlling the disease. All commercial carrot cultivars were susceptible to violet root rot. Control measures should rely on disease management strategies which involve cultural practices and prevention of spread of the disease. Keywords: Carrots, fungicides, Helicobasidium purpureum, Rhizoctonia crocorum, soil fumigation, violet root rot. INTRODUCTION Fresh carrots have become a promising export crop to Asia. Export value has risen from $1.0 million in 1993 to about $5.0 million in 1996. Violet root rot of carrots (caused by Helicobasidium purpureum Pat.) has become a major problem for carrot growers in the Ohakune region (central North Island) of New Zealand. Leaves of infected plants become chlorotic and die. Infection in a crop starts with small patches which increase in size. Lesions on infected roots are first purplish in colour and then turn cinnamon-brown. If infected roots are pulled out of the ground, abnormally large masses of soil cling to the surfaces of the root lesions.
    [Show full text]