Air New Zealand Limited

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Air New Zealand Limited Air New Zealand Limited Annual Report 2001 AIR NEWZEALANDLIMITEDANNUALREPORT 2001 Brought to you by Global Reports KEY RESULTS Financial • Net Loss after Tax for the Group1 of $1.4252 million (207.1 cents per share (cps)) • Net Loss after Tax, excluding Unusual Items of $173.0 million (25.1cps) • Cash Flow From Operations of $146.3 million (21.3 cps) • Revenue up 117.7 percent to $7,960.1 million • Net Debt to Book Capitalisation (including off-balance sheet items) of 93.7 percent • Total Dividend for year of 4 cps (no final dividend) Operational • Flew 21 million passengers (up 1.1 percent) to 190 destinations • During Ansett fleet groundings managed to deliver 95 percent of passengers to their destinations on the scheduled day at critical Christmas and Easter periods • Flew an extra 25,000 domestic New Zealand passengers in the week following the collapse of Qantas NZ • Successfully launched Freedom Air in the New Zealand domestic market Subsequent Events Ansett • Ansett Holdings Limited placed was into voluntary administration on 12 September 2001 • The effect of this has been to cause Air New Zealand to recognise additional losses of approximately $350 million. This amount includes allowance for the $185 million settlement between the company and the Voluntary Administrator of Ansett International Aviation • Terrorist attacks in the United States on 11 September have had a significantly negative impact or airlines internationally • Consequently, Air New Zealand has initiated schedule changes to respond to lower demand Recapitalisation • Plan announced to seek shareholder approval to recapitalise Air New Zealand by up to $885 million through the placement of new shares to the New Zealand Government • $300 million was received on 15 October as proceeds of a loan agreement with the New Zealand Government. Repayment of this loan is proposed to be by issue of convertible preference shares as part of the above recapitalisation. 1 “The Group” throughout this release refers to all Air New Zealand consolidated businesses (including Ansett Holdings Limited and subsidiary companies). 2 All currency amounts are in New Zealand dollars unless otherwise indicated Brought to you by Global Reports KEY INDICATORS CONTENTS ASKs* REVENUE EARNED (Millions) (NZ$ Millions) Key Results IFC 60,000 8000 7960 7000 Contents 1 50,000 50017 6000 Directors’ Report 4 40,000 5000 Management Discussion 29624 28995 28946 30114 30,000 4000 3656 and Analysis 5 3359 3089 3000 2931 20,000 Board of Directors 11 2000 Corporate Governance 12 10,000 1000 New Zealand Stock 0 0 97 98 99 00 01 97 98 99 00 01 Exchange Disclosures 14 Group Financial Statements 16 Statement of EARNINGS PER SHARE CASHFLOW PER SHARE Accounting Policies 20 (Cents per share) (Cents per share) Notes to Financial Statements 24 40 38 70 69 29 26 Auditor’s Report 53 20 60 58 59 Ten Year Statistical Review 56 0 50 -40 Shareholder Information 58 40 -80 Directors’ Statement 66 30 28 -120 -106 21 Air New Zealand and 20 -160 Star Alliance Partners -200 10 Route Network 67 -207 -240 0 97 98 99 00 01 97 98 99 00 01 Corporate Directory 68 TOTAL ASSETS GEARING (NZ$ Millions) (%) 9,000 8965 100 93 8114 8,000 90 7,000 80 76 70 6,000 60 56 5,000 52 53 4391 4104 50 4,000 3356 40 3,000 30 2,000 20 1,000 10 0 0 97 98 99 00 01 97 98 99 00 01 1 Brought to you by Global Reports DIRECTORS’ REPORT The 2001 Financial Year and subsequent months have been among the most demanding in Air New Zealand’s history. The company has faced challenges unprecedented in the airline industry generally and at Air New Zealand specifically. We close the period with a recapitalisation proposal to be put at our forthcoming Annual Meeting which, if approved, will see the New Zealand Government return as the largest shareholder of Air New Zealand. This recapitalisation proposal would also result in Air New Zealand’s financial position being returned to a more sustainable base from which it can re-develop its strength as the New Zealand national flag carrier. Since acquiring the second half of Ansett Holdings from News Corporation in late June 2000, the Air New Zealand-Ansett Group has endured extremely adverse operating conditions. Much of this has been extensively covered in the media, but still warrants comment in this Annual Report for the 2001 Financial Year. At an industry level, high fuel costs, low exchange rates and intense competition have suppressed airline profitability globally. These influences were foreshadowed in Air New Zealand’s previous Annual Report. Notwithstanding this, the degree to which these factors would affect the company was not known at that time and they have had a significant impact on our 2001 financial year results. For example, the combination of high oil prices and low exchange rates resulted in Air New Zealand’s fuel bill for the year increasing by $378 million. Additionally, intense competition in the Australian domestic market resulted in Ansett Australia’s revenues under-performing budget significantly. At a Company level, these influences had a major detrimental effect on the Company’s integration programme for Air New Zealand and Ansett. This programme was intended to capture the significant cost savings and revenue enhancement opportunities that under-pinned the logic for bringing the businesses together. The establishment of a successful Air New Zealand-Ansett Group had always been expected to be a substantial task in view of the issues confronting Ansett. However, the detail and extent of the problems (especially poor maintenance planning) found at Ansett once Air New Zealand had assumed management control from News Corporation was greater than expected. The consequence was unacceptable reliability and punctuality performance which in turn lowered customer satisfaction and manifested itself in declining market share. This issue was most obvious when it led to the groundings of the B767-200 fleet during the Christmas and Easter holiday periods. These groundings occurred as a result of issues uncovered when rigorous maintenance procedures were applied to the Ansett fleet. Problems identified were notified, as legally required, to CASA which decided to halt flying until it could be assured that safety was not being compromised. The impact of this was to dent customer confidence and further market share was ceded to competitors. To address these issues Air New Zealand’s new management team early in the second half of the financial year implemented a two pronged strategy to recover Ansett’s performance. The solutions first involved addressing Ansett’s performance as a full service airline to recover its share of the premium business travel market. The second element of the strategy required development of an opportunity for the Air New Zealand-Ansett Group to compete in the rapidly evolving low cost airline market. Ansett was facing entrenched high costs, unreliable and outdated product and aggressive competition both from Qantas as a full service airline and from new entrants at the budget operator level. This left Ansett losing market share in both sectors and having to follow the enormous pricing discounts being offered at all market levels. 2 Brought to you by Global Reports Ansett’s strengths included its dedicated staff, loyal customer base and well-established brand. These were a key part of the basis on which the company was confident its recovery strategy would succeed. It was understood that Ansett’s recovery would require tough measures on cost reduction while investing heavily in catching up a large backlog of aircraft maintenance falling due during 2001 and 2002. This in turn required substantial capital investment in additional and newer aircraft capacity initially to maintain and then to grow Ansett’s services. Further capital was required to improve in-flight product and terminal standards to remain competitive. With lower costs and revitalised product, Ansett would have been well placed to recover its market share and profitability. Both the established major airlines in Australia had to react to the new entrants offering different service levels. The unrealistic pricing offered by these operators soon saw Impulse facing financial failure until it was effectively acquired by Qantas. Ansett was left without a response in the low cost market and discussions with owners of the new Australian low-cost entrant Virgin Blue were entered into while parallel options, including the expansion of Freedom, were developed. A successful outcome in that market would have added significant value to Ansett itself as it focused on its traditional full service airline role. The deteriorating profitability of Ansett in a rapidly changing industry and newly highly competitive domestic market in Australia, on top of poor financial performance of Air New Zealand’s international operations, meant however that the short term demand for capital to fund Ansett’s revival and establish a position in the low cost market was beyond the existing financial resources of Air New Zealand. Following extensive work by management and by industry advisers, an initial recapitalisation plan was discussed with the New Zealand Government in June 2001 and a formal proposal followed in mid-July. The proposal, supported by Singapore Airlines, included a plan to increase Singapore Airlines’ share ownership to 49 percent by way of a share placement. This placement was proposed to be followed by a pro-rata rights issue to all shareholders and a potential capital notes issue. Combined, these initiatives would have raised capital in excess of NZ$1 billion, allowing Air New Zealand to sustain the ongoing losses at Ansett while completing the integration programme, upgrading the fleet and acquiring Virgin Blue, all of which would have put the business on a sound competitive footing.
Recommended publications
  • The World's Most Active Banking Professionals on Social
    Oceania's Most Active Banking Professionals on Social - February 2021 Industry at a glance: Why should you care? So, where does your company rank? Position Company Name LinkedIn URL Location Employees on LinkedIn No. Employees Shared (Last 30 Days) % Shared (Last 30 Days) Rank Change 1 Teachers Mutual Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/285023Australia 451 34 7.54% ▲ 4 2 P&N Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/2993310Australia 246 18 7.32% ▲ 8 3 Reserve Bank of New Zealand https://www.linkedin.com/company/691462New Zealand 401 29 7.23% ▲ 9 4 Heritage Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/68461Australia 640 46 7.19% ▲ 9 5 Bendigo Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/10851946Australia 609 34 5.58% ▼ -4 6 Westpac Institutional Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/2731362Australia 1,403 73 5.20% ▲ 16 7 Kiwibank https://www.linkedin.com/company/8730New Zealand 1,658 84 5.07% ▲ 10 8 Greater Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/1111921Australia 621 31 4.99% ▲ 0 9 Heartland Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/2791687New Zealand 362 18 4.97% ▼ -6 10 ME Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/927944Australia 1,241 61 4.92% ▲ 1 11 Beyond Bank Australia https://www.linkedin.com/company/141977Australia 468 22 4.70% ▼ -2 12 Bank of New Zealand https://www.linkedin.com/company/7841New Zealand 4,733 216 4.56% ▼ -10 13 ING Australia https://www.linkedin.com/company/387202Australia 1,319 59 4.47% ▲ 16 14 Credit Union Australia https://www.linkedin.com/company/784868Australia 952 42 4.41% ▼ -7 15 Westpac https://www.linkedin.com/company/3597Australia
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Guide
    WridgWays Global Guide to Living in New Zealand Image source: Photo by Laura Smetsers on Unsplash Disclaimer: Though WridgWays strives to maintain the materials in this document, keeping them as accurate and current as possible, the information is collected for reference purpose. WridgWays assumes no liability for any inaccurate or incomplete information, nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Table of Contents 1. General Information 2 2. Culture, Lifestyle and Language 4 3. Visa and Migration 7 4. Housing 8 5. Banking Services 11 6. Medical Services 12 7. Schooling 16 8. Utilities 18 9. Telecommunications 19 10. Public Transport 20 11. Driving 23 12. Moving your Pet 27 13. Household Goods Shipment and Customs Information 28 14. Shopping 29 1 1. General Information Geographic Location Main Locations New Zealand or Aotearoa, the Māori name, is an island country in Almost three-quarters of the population live on the North Island of the southwestern Pacific Ocean, with a total land area spanning New Zealand. Of this, one-third of the population live in the largest city, 268,021 km2. It consists of two main landmasses, the North Island Auckland. (Te Ika-a-Mui) and the South Island (Te Waipounamu), and Auckland is the commercial heart and international hub of New approximately 600 smaller islands. Aotearoa’s literal translation Zealand. It is considered one of the world's most liveable cities, and is “land of the long white cloud.” The country is long and narrow, offers a culturally diverse and cosmopolitan lifestyle. 1,600 kilometres north to south, and 400 kilometres at its widest point.
    [Show full text]
  • 2270 FB Front Section 4Pdf.Qx¡
    2001ANNUAL REPORT the separation is behind us there are many opportunities to enhance returns our prime focus is operational improvement 2 Chairman’s review 4 Chief executive’s review 6 Building Products 8 Concrete 10 Construction 11 Distribution Contents 12 People & safety 13 Environment & community 14 Fletcher Building’s profile 16 Fletcher Building directors 18 Corporate governance 21 Fletcher Building management 22 Financial review 24 Financial statements 56 Audit report 57 Statutory disclosure 59 Shareholder information 61 Investor information www.fletcherbuilding.com Fletcher Building is committed to a high level of customer service. As part of this commitment, we recently launched a significantly upgraded internet site. The new site displays information on Fletcher Building’s operations and highlights our well established, powerful brands. 01 Chairman’s review A new beginning As your Chairman, I am pleased to report, on behalf of the Board of Directors, on the results and progress of our new company – Fletcher Building Limited. On 23 March this year, Fletcher Building Net earnings before unusual items were Limited acquired the operations, assets $22 million in the June period (compared and liabilities previously attributed to to $12 million for the rest of the year), Fletcher Challenge Limited – Building and cash flow from operations was Operations, completed the separation $159 million in the June period ($92 process from the former parent company million in the rest of the year). This and began a new stand-alone corporate strong recent improvement stands the existence. company in good stead as we move into the current year. This resolved an extended period of uncertainty about the future of the business.
    [Show full text]
  • Year Company Project Title Page 2018 ASB Bank Project Myday 2 2018
    This file contains examples of business projects descriptions from 2014 to 2018. The projects are: Year Company Project title Page 2018 ASB Bank Project MyDay 2 2018 Douglas Pharmaceutical Production Cycle Time and Scheduling 8 Efficiency 2018 Hansen Technologies Holistic Data Visualisation 12 2018 United Steel Growing market share under lumpy demand 17 2017 ASB Bank Project Sonar 21 2017 BNZ Project Impulse: Asset Quality Reporting Tool 27 2017 KPMG ThreatInspect Intel 33 2016 ASB Bank Project Short Circuit Track My Spending 38 2016 ASB Bank Cash in Transactional banking model for SME 44 customers 2016 BNZ Project Dragon 50 2016 Computer Fanatics Business Activity Monitoring 55 2016 Hansen Technologies PAY-TV WEB SELF-CARE 62 2015 ASB Bank Project Level Up, Training Recommendation 68 Application 2015 Computer Fanatics VetlinkSQL Stock 75 2015 KPMG Data Analytic Engine Refinement 81 2014 ASB Bank One Team Referral (OTR) Mobilisation 86 2014 Computer Fanatics Mobile Application Development 92 2014 Hansen Technologies Business Process Management System 100 2014 OneNet Service Unification Engine 106 1 Project MyDay Organisation ASB Head Office: 12 Jellicoe Street, Auckland 1010 0800 803 804 Project Sponsor Trevor Aumua Head of Retail Solutions Product Owner and Kyle Clarke Snr Manager Retail Solutions Technical Lead Project Mentor Reuben Edie Retail Solutions Specialist Business Sponsor Michael Evans Head of Branch Banking Support Project Supervisor Lech Janczewski [email protected] Project Team Members Kathryn Ren Kiri Lovell Pearl Telang Taran Singh 2 ABOUT ASB ASB began in 1847 on Queen Street as the Auckland Savings Bank, New Zealand's first savings bank. Since then, through continuous innovation and a commitment to 'serve the community; to grow; and to help kiwis grow', ASB have provided a range of products in banking.
    [Show full text]
  • Participant List
    Participant List 10/20/2019 8:45:44 AM Category First Name Last Name Position Organization Nationality CSO Jillian Abballe UN Advocacy Officer and Anglican Communion United States Head of Office Ramil Abbasov Chariman of the Managing Spektr Socio-Economic Azerbaijan Board Researches and Development Public Union Babak Abbaszadeh President and Chief Toronto Centre for Global Canada Executive Officer Leadership in Financial Supervision Amr Abdallah Director, Gulf Programs Educaiton for Employment - United States EFE HAGAR ABDELRAHM African affairs & SDGs Unit Maat for Peace, Development Egypt AN Manager and Human Rights Abukar Abdi CEO Juba Foundation Kenya Nabil Abdo MENA Senior Policy Oxfam International Lebanon Advisor Mala Abdulaziz Executive director Swift Relief Foundation Nigeria Maryati Abdullah Director/National Publish What You Pay Indonesia Coordinator Indonesia Yussuf Abdullahi Regional Team Lead Pact Kenya Abdulahi Abdulraheem Executive Director Initiative for Sound Education Nigeria Relationship & Health Muttaqa Abdulra'uf Research Fellow International Trade Union Nigeria Confederation (ITUC) Kehinde Abdulsalam Interfaith Minister Strength in Diversity Nigeria Development Centre, Nigeria Kassim Abdulsalam Zonal Coordinator/Field Strength in Diversity Nigeria Executive Development Centre, Nigeria and Farmers Advocacy and Support Initiative in Nig Shahlo Abdunabizoda Director Jahon Tajikistan Shontaye Abegaz Executive Director International Insitute for Human United States Security Subhashini Abeysinghe Research Director Verite
    [Show full text]
  • Congratulations! 2014 NEW ZEALAND EFFIE AWARD FINALISTS
    2014 NEW ZEALAND EFFIE AWARD FINALISTS AGENCY ADVERTISER ENTRY TITLE A - Charity/Not for Profit .99 Leukaemia and Blood Cancer New Zealand (LBC) Shave For A Cure Colenso BBDO/Proximity New Zealand MARS Share For Dogs DDB Paw Justice A World without Animals FCB New Zealand Brothers in Arms Youth Mentoring Bank Job Ogilvy & Mather NZ World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) New Zealand The Last 55 B - Social Marketing/Public Service Clemenger BBDO New Zealand Transport Agency Mistakes FCB New Zealand Health Promotion Agency (HPA) Say Yeah, Nah FCB New Zealand Maritime New Zealand Partners in Safety: Saving lives like they did in the 80's FCB New Zealand Statistics New Zealand Engaging disenfranchised youth in the 2013 Census Ogilvy & Mather NZ Energy Efficiency Conservation Authority (EECA) Move towards the light Ogilvy & Mather NZ Environmental Protection Authority EPA Business Campaign Getting to the answer faster: how the use of Choice Modelling helped the NZDF recruit top Officer Saatchi & Saatchi New Zealand Defence Force talent C - Retail/Etail .99 Foodstuffs (New Zealand) Limited New World Little Shop Barnes Catmur & Friends Hell Pizza Rabbit Pizza Billboard Colenso BBDO/Proximity New Zealand Burger King Anti Pre Roll DDB The Warehouse Group Back to School: Getting Ahead with Head to Toe DDB The Warehouse Group Bringing Back The Doubters FCB New Zealand JR/Duty Free Reinventing the wheel FCB New Zealand Noel Leeming Group People's Story Ogilvy & Mather NZ Progressive Enterprises Ltd A Pincer on Price D - Business to Business (B2B) FCB New
    [Show full text]
  • Ideology Or Economics: Government Banking in New Zealand Cardow A., Tripe D.W
    Ideology or Economics: Government Banking in New Zealand Cardow A., Tripe D.W. and Wilson W.R. Massey University, New Zealand Abstract We argue that in the short history of New Zealand banking, political experimentation, based at first upon socialist ideology of the 1940’s led to the nationalisation of The Bank of New Zealand (BNZ), followed by a period of neo-liberalism in the 1980’s and early 1990’s in which the bank was privatised. We further argue that the establishment of Kiwibank Ltd (Kiwibank) in New Zealand at the dawn of the 21st Century was a return to the political ideology of the 1940’s. In this article we discuss the nationalisation and subsequent privatisation of the BNZ and draw a parallel between the perceived banking environment as it existed in New Zealand in the 20th Century and as it existed at the establishment of Kiwibank. By way of context setting we also discuss the political environment as it relates to the nationalisation of the Bank of England. We find that in New Zealand political experimentation, not commercial pragmatism was the underlying motivating factor for the state’s involvement in banking. The article contributes to the pool of knowledge regarding the political motivations behind nationalisation and state ownership of banking assets. The article is of interest to economic and political historians as well as those who study New Zealand political party history. Future policy makers could do well to reflect upon the motivations for state ownership of banking assets by asking if their decisions are driven by ideology or economics.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of New Zealand Bank Efficiency
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. AN EXAMINATION OF NEW ZEALAND BANK EFFICIENCY A dissertation presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy m Banking Studies At Massey University Palmerston North New Zealand David William Lethbridge Tripe 2005 Abstract: This research explores the efficiency of the New Zealand banking system over the period 1996 to 2003 using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). DEA is used as a lack of data on prices and the relatively small cross-sections (because of the limited number of banks in the Tew Zealand market) pose difficultiesfo r the use of parametric methods. This is the first major research to make use of the data-set provided under the New Zealand banking disclosure regime, and the first major attempt at contrasting the relative efficiency of banks in Australia and New Zealand. The research discusses the problems of analysis of efficiency in small banking markets and proposes a solution through use of panel data. Analysis on this basis highlights problems that arise from changing enviromnental conditions (specifically from changes in the general level of interest rates), but also produces a reasonably consistent ranking of the efficiency of New Zealand banks. The research finds that equity IS an important input to the study of bank efficiency, and that it is a cause of diffe rences in relative efficiency between New Zealand and Australian banks.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 August 2003
    800 Bourke Street Docklands VIC 3008 AUSTRALIA www.nabgroup.com Wednesday, 18 November 2020 ASX Announcement NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED (NAB) RELEASES 2020 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION NAB today releases its 2020 Supplemental Information report which provides certain statistical information regarding NAB. The Supplemental Information voluntarily continues the disclosure of some of the information NAB previously disclosed to the U.S. market in its U.S. periodic reports filed with the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) when NAB was an SEC registrant. For further information: Media Mark Alexander M: +61 (0) 412 171 447 Investor Relations Natalie Coombe M: +61 (0) 477 327 540 National Australia Bank Limited ABN 12 004 044 937 AFSL and Australian Credit Licence 230686 2020 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REGARDING NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED CONTENTS Presentation of information 3 Selected financial data 6 Liquidity, funding and capital resources 9 Average balance sheet and related interest 14 Investment portfolio 19 Loan portfolio 20 Summary of loan loss experience 25 Deposits and other borrowings 32 2 National Australia Bank 2020 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REGARDING NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION Business overview National Australia Bank Limited (NAB) is a public limited company, incorporated on June 23, 1893 in Australia, which is NAB’s main domicile. Its registered office is 800 Bourke Street, Docklands Victoria 3008, Australia. NAB operates under the requirements of the Banking Act 1959 (Cth) and the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Basis of presentation This report is prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
    [Show full text]
  • FY10 Interim Report
    SKYCITY Entertainment INTERIM Group Limited REPORT 2010 CONTENTS Highlights 01 Chief Executive’s Review 02 Financial Statements 05 Directory 28 A copy of the FY10 Interim Result presentation can be found in the Investor Centre on our company website (www.skycityentertainmentgroup.com). HIGHLIGHTS + Reported net profit at $71.0m, up 29.6% on first half last year + Normalised net profit at $68.4m, up 23.0% on first half last year + New Zealand businesses resilient in challenging economic environment + Australian businesses continued growth momentum evident in FY09 + International business growth continued with turnover up 18% + Cinemas sale negotiated at an expected $10m surplus to carrying value + Debt repayment and tight control of capital expenditure + Strong balance sheet with sound debt profile + Interim dividend of 8.0cps – fully imputed KEY FINANCIAL RESULTS 1H10 1H09 MOVEMENT $M $M $M % Group Revenues 447.0 422.1 24.9 5.9% Normalised EBITDA 158.3 149.7 8.6 5.7% Reported EBITDA 160.1 148.5 11.6 7.8% Normalised NPAT 68.4 55.6 12.8 23.0% Reported NPAT 71.0 54.8 16.2 29.6% Normalised earnings adjust international business to theoretical return win rate and for non-recurring items SKYCITY ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LIMITED PAGE 1 / Interim Report 2010 cHiEf ExEcuTiVE’S REViEW DEAR SHAREHOLDER I am pleased to report continuing progress in our core objectives of building earnings across the Group, despite a challenging economic environment particularly in New Zealand, and further enhancing our balance sheet strength. RESULT HIGHLIGHTS Highlights
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Adjusted Its Business Quickly to Manage the Impact of Covid-19
    Media release 27 August 2020 Air New Zealand adjusted its business quickly to manage the impact of Covid-19 Air New Zealand today announces its 2020 result, affirming the unprecedented effect of the Covid- 19 pandemic on its business and the global aviation industry following extensive travel and border restrictions which commenced from March. Air New Zealand is reporting a loss before other significant items and taxation of $87 million1 for the 2020 financial year, compared to earnings of $387 million in the prior year. Despite reporting a strong interim profit of $198 million2 for the first six months of the financial year, and seeing positive demand on North American and regional routes early in the second half, Covid- related travel restrictions resulted in a 74 percent drop in passenger revenue from April to the end of June compared to the prior year, which drove the airline’s operating losses. Statutory losses before taxation, which include $541 million of other significant items, were $628 million, compared to earnings of $382 million last year. Non-cash items of $453 million reflected most of the other significant items, including the $338 million aircraft impairment charge related to grounding of the Boeing 777-200ER fleet for the foreseeable future. The airline has responded to this crisis with urgency, including securing additional liquidity, structurally reducing its cost base and deferring significant capex spend, whilst ensuring that the business remains well positioned to grow profitably when travel restrictions are eventually removed and customer demand returns. Quick and decisive action in response to Covid-19 Air New Zealand’s Chairman Dame Therese Walsh says she is proud of the way the business has responded to this crisis, acting with speed and agility to lower the cost base, and pivoting quickly to ramp up domestic and cargo services to help keep the New Zealand economy moving.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Institutions Performance Survey FIPS Banks – Review of 2019
    Financial Institutions Performance Survey FIPS Banks – Review of 2019 1 3.93% 0.99% escalation in decrease in NPAT operating expenses 8 2 10.85% 3 4.79% rise in net increase in provisions interest income 2 bps 4 5.37% decrease in net increase in interest margins gross lending 7 5 8.91% 6 11 bps rise in gross drop in average impaired assets funding costs Contents 2 The Survey 4 A KPMG view from the editor 8 Industry overview 20 Timeline of events 22 Sector performance 30 Analysis of annual results 38 Major banks: Quarterly analysis 42 Capital adequacy: The bar is set higher 46 Cultural takeaways: Lessons from financial services in China 48 Tax governance and compliance: The new certainty 50 FMA: Looking forward to a year of consolidation and change 52 NZBA: Conduct, culture and capital 54 CoreLogic: Review of property banking in 2019 56 Massey: Banking industry review and forecasts 60 Ownership and credit ratings 61 Descriptions of the credit rating grades 62 Definitions 63 KPMG’s Financial Services Team 64 Contact us KPMG’s Financial Services team provides focused and practical audit, tax and advisory services to the insurance, retail banking, corporate and investment banking, and investment management sectors. Our professionals have an in-depth understanding of the key issues facing financial institutions. Our team is led by senior partners with a wealth of client experience and relationships with many of the market players, regulators and leading industry bodies. 2 | KPMG | FIPS 2019 The Survey The KPMG Financial TABLE 1: ENTITY MOVEMENTS1 Institutions Performance Who’s out Who’s in Survey (FIPS) report of 2019 — Bank of China (NZ) Banking represents the 33rd year that Group Banks: 26 — Nil KPMG has provided in-depth — China Construction Bank (NZ) insights into New Zealand’s Banking Group banking sector.
    [Show full text]