DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Brief

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Monthly Management Report Period: 1 – 31 July 2011 Prepared 16 August 2011 For: Board of Directors Auckland Waterfront Development Agency Limited Monthly Management Report to 31 July 2011 CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Chief Executive‟s Overview ........................................................................................ 1 1.2 Recommendations ..................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Board Approvals Required ......................................................................................... 1 2. GOVERNANCE 2.1 Chairman‟s Report ...................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Local Board Engagement Plan ................................................................................... 4 2.3 Statement of Intent 2011-2014.......................................................................................4 3. COMMUNICATIONS 3.1 Stakeholder Consultation ........................................................................................... 5 3.2 Media ......................................................................................................................... 5 3.3 Update on Work-in-Progress ...................................................................................... 5 3.4 New Initiatives ............................................................................................................ 5 4. PLANNING & DESIGN 4.1 The Auckland Plan ..................................................................................................... 6 4.2 Programme ................................................................................................................ 6 4.43 Transport .................................................................................................................... 7 5. STATUTORY PROCESS 5.1 Central Government ................................................................................................... 8 5.2 Wynyard Quarter Plan Changes 3 and 4 .................................................................... 8 5.3 Resource Consents ..................................................................................................... 8 6. PLACE MANAGEMENT 6.1 The Jellicoe Precinct Place & Activation Programme ................................................. 9 6.2 A Design Led Approach to Place & Activation ........................................................... 9 6.3 Programme: First 100 Days Update ......................................................................... 10 6.4 Place Intervention ..................................................................................................... 11 7. MARINA OPERATIONS 7.1 Operations ................................................................................................................ 12 7.2 Asset Management .................................................................................................. 12 7.3 Compliance ............................................................................................................... 12 8. DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT 8.1 Overall Programme ................................................................................................... 13 8.2 Westhaven – Construction ....................................................................................... 13 8.3 Wynyard Public Works .............................................................................................. 13 8.4 Wynyard Private Works ............................................................................................ 14 8.5 Viaduct Harbour ....................................................................................................... 14 8.6 Queens Wharf .......................................................................................................... 14 8.7 Public Art .................................................................................................................. 15 K:\AWDA Board\2011 Reports\August 2011 (Public) Monthly Management Report to 31 July 2011 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Chief Executive’s Overview All the team is absolutely thrilled with the opening ceremony for Wynyard Quarter on 6 August 2011, and more importantly, the result which we think is ground-breaking for Auckland and New Zealand in terms of urban regeneration. We‟ve tried, through a design-led approach, to significantly raise the bar on urban design and architectural quality for Auckland and then have overlayed a sophisticated activation programme of which the Opening Day was Day 1. Particular emphasis on the activation programme is over the next 100 days and I‟m sure you‟ll see everyone down on the waterfront enjoying themselves. We are also conscious that the Waterfront acts as a catalyst for growth, not merely displacing activity from other areas. We‟ve been careful to pitch the offering at Wynyard Quarter in a way that complements other waterfront areas, but nevertheless is differentiated in its own right, celebrating the working waterfront. 1.2 Recommendations It is recommended that the report is received. 1.3 Board Approvals Required There are no Board approvals required this month. K:\AWDA Board\2011 Reports\August 2011 (Public) Page 1 of 15 Monthly Management Report to 31 July 2011 2. GOVERNANCE 2.1 Chairman’s Report A Grand Opening I would like to acknowledge the former Board of Sea+City and the many board members who have gone before, that set in place the structure and the vision for Waterfront Auckland. We stand on the shoulders of giants and this is a classic case of seeing a grand vision delivered. Waterfront Auckland opened its amazing future on Saturday, 6 August 2011 and what a truly fine grand event it was. They say if you build it they will come and Auckland came to the waterfront to celebrate and to see the unveiling of one of the world‟s newest waterfront developments. They sure weren‟t disappointed. This waterfront, like many of world‟s great waterfronts, reveals the very best of what can be seen as inspirational space, a sense of design and a sense of place. It is simply sensational. The waterfront combines the historic past which is rich in the seafaring nautical history of Auckland and while keeping the very best of buildings and structures, has added to the ambience of this space with some dazzling new development and re-developments. It‟s a winnable combination that has a mixture of sea, humanity and technology. It‟s a response to decades of Aucklanders needing to interface with their waterfront and the beginning of an unforgettable experience for Aucklanders of all generations. It is indeed a destination. The development has been praised by the Prime Minister, Government Ministers, the Mayor and Councillors. There is an air of astonishment that it has simply arisen out of nothing. We all know that only nothing comes from nothing. This has been a commitment by many smart and able people who have dreamed big dreams and if the Mayor dreams of Auckland being one of the world‟s most liveable cities, he should add the waterfront as being one of the great waterfronts of the world. It helps to have a great harbour and Auckland is simply blessed with a jewel in the crown of waterfronts. It helps to have a grand entrance and the Hauraki Gulf provides that. Although a recent report plays down its pristine natural heritage somewhat in water quality and marine life, it still has a string of magnificent islands to greet any international traveller, sailing or steaming in to the gulf entrance of Auckland. These islands set the scene for what is to come. Great Barrier and Little Barrier flank the outer seaward passage and Little Barrier in particular, with its heritage of flora and fauna, is internationally renowned and the inner gulf islands are still protected and sparsely developed. Swinging into the Waitematā around North Head, the waterfront unfolds and beyond the cityscape, not unlike San Francisco or Vancouver, has suddenly come to life. At night it‟s a dazzling sight. There is a dramatic and dynamic transition between the waterfront and the buildings behind and it would be wrong not to say how magnificent the Cloud looks in its purple, green and red hues floating on Queens Wharf. Shed 10, with is dramatic „10‟ logo, is cleaned up in its new white coat and sits serenely Edwardian offering a space that‟s inviting and ideal for the 100,000 visitors that will enjoy the hospitality of Rugby World Cup. The opening of Britomart Quarter lifted the game plan for a stylish waterfront and a long lasting party central if ever there was a working title. With restaurants, bars and great hospitality, with retail shops and a flow through design, Britomart comes of age and takes its place in the 21st Century. It had a rough century, the hideous bus terminal and parking building was a blight on the Auckland landscape and one has to think how long we suffered such a horror show that used to be Britomart. But that‟s now all in the past and as we move forward as Waterfront Auckland we continue to develop and to grow our commitment to design and to form and function will be applauded not only in Auckland but throughout New Zealand. But for a start, the opening on Saturday brought many of these elements together. Ngati Whatua, the ancestral iwi, came in force and brought their mana and the Prime Minister to the Te Wero Bridge and Karanga Place and an opening that was elegant, sophisticated and full of humour and good will.
Recommended publications
  • America's Cup Traffic and Transport Technical Report

    America's Cup Traffic and Transport Technical Report

    Report America’s Cup Traffic and Transport Technical Report for Resource Consent Application, Wynyard Hobson Prepared for Panuku Development Auckland and Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment Prepared by Beca Ltd (Beca) April 2018 America's Cup: Wynyard Hobson Traffic and Transport Technical Report Revision History Revision Nº Prepared By Description Date 1 Kara Hartshorne Draft Issue for Council Review 07/04/2018 2 Kara Hartshorne Issue for Legal Review 11/04/2018 3 Kara Hartshorne Final Issue 12/04/2018 Document Acceptance Action Name Signed Date Prepared by Kara Hartshorne 11/04/2018 Reviewed by Joe Phillips 12/04/2018 Approved by Joe Phillips 12/04/2018 on behalf of Beca Ltd © Beca 2018 (unless Beca has expressly agreed otherwise with the Client in writing). This report has been prepared by Beca on the specific instructions of our Client. It is solely for our Client’s use for the purpose for which it is intended in accordance with the agreed scope of work. Any use or reliance by any person contrary to the above, to which Beca has not given its prior written consent, is at that person's own risk. Beca // 12 April 2018 3233847 // NZ1-15046384-2 // i America's Cup: Wynyard Hobson Traffic and Transport Technical Report Executive Summary This report provides an assessment of the traffic and transport effects of the construction, operation and use of the America’s Cup Wynyard Hobson physical infrastructure1. This includes traffic and transport effects of: The Construction phase. The Operational phase, including the permanent stopping of part of Brigham Street.
  • Wynyard Quarter: Urban Design Framework 2007 Was Developed to Provide a Framework for the Development of Wynyard Precinct

    Wynyard Quarter: Urban Design Framework 2007 Was Developed to Provide a Framework for the Development of Wynyard Precinct

    Wynyard Precinct: Urban Design Framework February 2014 Contents 1.0 Introduction – Realising Auckland’s Waterfront Potential 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Background 1.3 Purpose 1.4 Relationship to the Operative District Plan and Proposed Unitary Plan 1.5 Relationship to the Auckland Plan and Waterfront Plan 1.6 Relationship to the Sustainable Development Framework 1.7 Other Waterfront Auckland Guidelines and Rules 2.0 Vision 2.1 Vision for the Auckland waterfront 2.2 Vision for Wynyard Precinct 3.0 Urban Design Concepts 3.1 Concept 1 – The Waterfront Axis 3.2 Concept 2 – The Park Axis 3.3 Concept 3 – The Wharf Axis 3.4 Concept 4 – Waterfront Precincts 4.0 Urban Design Principles 4.1 Principle 1 – Enabling Sustainable Development 4.2 Principle 2 – Facilitating Sustainable Transport and Infrastructure 4.3 Principle 3 – Connecting Waterfront Precincts 4.4 Principle 4 – Providing Waterfront Access 4.5 Principle 5 – Establishing Diverse Public Spaces 4.6 Principle 6 – Promoting an Active and Working Waterfront 4.7 Principle 7 – Creating Appropriate Building Height, Scale, and Form 4.8 Principle 8 – Facilitating a Mix of Uses and Activities 5.0 Indicative Plan fig. 1 Wynyard Precinct aerial view looking south, 2010 5.1 Existing Site 5.2 UDF 2010 Height Plan 5.3 Indicative Height Plan – Permitted Height 6.0 UDF Refresh: Feasibility Study 6.1 Development Controls as per District Plan 6.2 Development as anticipated in the UDF 2007 6.3 Evolution since the District Plan and the UDF 6.4 Example of approach with more flexibility 6.4.1 Amendments to Sites 19/19A/20/20A 6.4.2 Amendments to Sites 19/19A/20/20A – Design Flexibility Study 6.4.3 Amendments to Sites 15/25 6.4.4 Amendments to Sites 27-31A, 34-38A 6.5 Revised Photo Montages 7.0 List of Figures Wynyard Precinct - Urban Design Framework February 2014 Page 3 1.0 Introduction Realising Auckland’s Waterfront Potential 1.1 Introduction Wynyard Precinct, previously known as the ‘Tank Farm’ and ‘Western Reclamation’ is located within the western portion of the wider Auckland City’s waterfront.
  • THE WATERFRONT PLAN AKL 2012 Tamaki – Kainga Nga Ika Me Nga Wheua Katoa! Auckland – Where the Fish Are So Succulent You Can Eat Them Bones and All!

    THE WATERFRONT PLAN AKL 2012 Tamaki – Kainga Nga Ika Me Nga Wheua Katoa! Auckland – Where the Fish Are So Succulent You Can Eat Them Bones and All!

    THE WATERFRONT PLAN AKL 2012 Tamaki – kainga nga ika me nga wheua katoa! Auckland – where the fish are so succulent you can eat them bones and all! This proverb alludes to the once abundant and sought after marine resources of Auckland’s waterfront. It signals Waterfront Auckland’s desire to create a sustainable waterfront providing for the current and future generations of Aucklanders. A place all Aucklanders can access the Waitemata Harbour for recreation, business or cultural practices. FOREWORD The waterfront has reignited Aucklander’s pride in their city. The pride and enthusiasm with which Aucklanders have embraced their new waterfront continues to amaze me. Although in its infancy, stage one of the redeveloped Wynyard Quarter and the expanse of Queens Wharf, attract people day after day, rain and shine. When Waterfront Auckland put forward its draft plans for the redevelopment of the whole waterfront last year we received hundreds of letters, emails and submissions. Most were hugely positive. “Just get on with it!” was the cry. Our job at Waterfront Auckland is to lead the momentum of the revitalisation, and of pride. Having listened to Aucklanders, we have refined our plans and here, we present a vision for how the waterfront could be redeveloped, how it can continue to create transformational change. We are living in an extraordinary time, perhaps unprecedented in recent history where opportunity is constrained and likely to remain so for some time to come. Our approach in these plans is to strike a balance that seizes opportunity while it is offering and continues to strive for a visionary outcome that our city and its people deserve.
  • The Economic Value of the Redeveloped Auckland Waterfront

    The Economic Value of the Redeveloped Auckland Waterfront

    The economic value of the redeveloped Auckland Waterfront The economic value of the redeveloped Auckland Waterfront November 2010 1 The economic value of the redeveloped Auckland Waterfront PricewaterhouseCoopers 26 November 2010 188 Quay Street Private Bag 92162 Auckland 1142 New Zealand Telephone +64 9 355 8000 John Dalzell Facsimile +64 9 355 8001 Direct Phone +64 9 355 8600 Chief Executive Direct Fax +64 9 355 8024 Sea+City Projects Ltd www.pwc.com/nz Pier 21, 11 Westhaven Drive AUCKLAND Dear John The economic value of the redeveloped Auckland Waterfront In accordance with the terms of our engagement letter dated 27 August 2010, we attach our report on the economic value of the redeveloped Auckland waterfront. This report should be read in conjunction with the Restrictions in Appendix A. Our key findings and recommendations are contained in the Executive Summary in Section 1 of the Report. If you require any clarification or further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours sincerely PricewaterhouseCoopers Chris Taylor, Partner The economic value of the redeveloped Auckland Waterfront Table of Contents 1 Executive summary.............................................................................................................................................................................................................1 2 Background .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................4

  • Wynyard Crossing Bridge

    Wynyard Crossing Bridge Urban Design Assessment For Panuku Development Auckland Ltd McIndoe URBAN Wynyard Crossing Urban Design Assessment 13 June 2019 1 Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Scope 1.2 Project description 1.3 Context overview 1.4 Planning framework 2 Connectivity, location and alignment 2.1 Context and proposal 2.2 Alignment 2.3 Geometry and relation to context 2.4 Temporary bridge 2.5 Conclusions 3 Bridge visual and aesthetic quality 3.1 Visual character of the setting 3.2 Visual and aesthetic design quality expectations 3.3 Conceptual quality 3.4 Integration of art initiatives 3.5 Detail and aesthetic effect 3.6 Bridge height 3.7 Night-time visual expression, and lighting design 3.8 Potential for glare from sunlight 3.9 Conclusions 4 Bridge function 4.1 Capacity and width 4.2 Carriageway function 4.3 Quality of components and elements 4.4 Quality of visual experience for bridge users 4.5 Bridge maintenance and serviceability 4.6 Conclusions 5 Public open space design 5.1 Context 5.2 Relation to spaces around 5.3 Suitability of ‘ramp’ gradient 5.4 Quality of components and elements 5.5 Conclusions 6 Unitary Plan Assessment 6.1 Scope 6.2 Conclusions 7 Conclusions APPENDIX 1: Unitary Plan Assessment A1.1 Assessment relative to Viaduct Harbour Precinct objectives and policies A1.2 Assessment relative to Wynyard Quarter Precinct objectives and policies A1.3 Assessment relative to Viaduct Harbour Precinct assessment criteria for a bridge across the Viaduct Harbour McIndoe URBAN Wynyard Crossing Urban Design Assessment 13 June 2019 2 1 Introduction 1.1 Scope This is an urban design assessment of the proposal relative to identified urban design issues and relevant parts of the Unitary Plan.
  • WATERFRONT AUCKLAND an Auckland Council Controlled Organisation

    WATERFRONT AUCKLAND an Auckland Council Controlled Organisation

    WATERFRONT AUCKLAND An Auckland Council Controlled Organisation Waterfront Auckland (Auckland Waterfront Development Agency Limited) Statement of Intent for the period from 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2014 Adopted by Waterfront Auckland on 22 June 2011 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2. WHO WE ARE AND WHAT WE DO ......................................................................................................... 4 3. GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES .................................................................................. 5 4. THE VISION FOR AUCKLAND’S WATERFRONT ................................................................................... 7 5. NATURE AND SCOPE OF ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................... 8 6. GOALS AND BUSINESS OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................... 10 7. STRATEGIC PROJECTS AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES ............................................................... 11 8 CONTRIBUTION TO AUCKLAND COUNCIL OBJECTIVES .................................................................... 19 9. RELATIONSHIPS WITH AUCKLAND COUNCIL, CCOS AND STAKEHOLDERS .................................. 20 10 REPORTING TO AUCKLAND COUNCIL ................................................................................................. 23 11 APPROACH TO GOVERNANCE
  • Wynyard Crossing Assessment of Environmental Effects

    Wynyard Crossing Assessment of Environmental Effects

    Wynyard Crossing Assessment of Environmental Effects Application for Resource Consent 14 June 2019 CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................... 6 2.0 THE APPLICANT AND PROPERTY DETAILS ........................................................ 10 3.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 12 3.1 Overview ................................................................................................12 3.2 Format of Assessment ...........................................................................13 3.3 Consultants and contributions ...............................................................14 4.0 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................. 15 4.1 History of connection between Wynyard Precinct and Viaduct Harbour Precinct ..................................................................................................15 4.2 Strategic Context....................................................................................21 5.0 THE PROPOSAL ................................................................................................ 26 5.1 Overview ................................................................................................26 5.2 Project Objectives and Requirements ....................................................27 5.3 Construction of the Temporary Crossing ...............................................27
  • WATERFRONT AUCKLAND : a Heritage Study | 1

    WATERFRONT AUCKLAND : a Heritage Study | 1

    The Auckland Waterfront Heritage Study PREPARED FOR Waterfront Auckland 11045 | October 2011 CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 HERITAGE STUDY 3 APPENDICES 19 1 Chronology 19 2 Bibliography 40 3 Maps and Plans 46 4 Auckland Waterfront Plans 50 - Maori Cultural Landscape - European Cultural Landscape – Eastern Waterfront - European Cultural Landscape – Central Business District - European Cultural Landscape – Western Waterfront - Port Development 5 Historic Images 56 Introduction Waterfront Auckland (An Auckland Council Organisation) has commissioned Salmond Reed Architects (SRA) to undertake research as the foundation for a heritage trail within their administrative area. This area extends from Teal Park in the east to Point Erin Park in the west and is bounded by Tamaki Drive, The Strand, Parnell Rise, Beach Road, Customs Street, Fanshawe Street, Halsey Street, Victoria Street West, Beaumont Street, State Highway 1, Sarsfield Street and Curran Street, Herne Bay. (as illustrated below) A number of heritage walks have already been produced by the former Auckland City Council, including walks for Ponsonby, Downtown, Midtown, Uptown, Original Foreshore, Princes Street University Quarter. In addition, a University heritage trail was produced by the University of Auckland Business School. It is anticipated that this report will form the basis of a waterfront heritage trail publication in the same hand-held format used for the existing walks. The study sits within a broader framework established by the former Auckland City Council before the Supercity amalgamation of 2010. Its publication: The Historic Landscape, Guidelines to a New Approach, outlines a methodology based on emerging national and international best practice to consider a holistic landscape view of heritage, rather than the current segmented and discipline-based view of individual heritage resources, which groups them into categories such as geology, archaeological sites, sites of significance to Maori, trees, ecological sites and buildings and structures.
  • Waterfront Auckland (Auckland Waterfront Development Agency Limited)

    Waterfront Auckland (Auckland Waterfront Development Agency Limited)

    Waterfront Auckland (Auckland Waterfront Development Agency Limited) Statement of Intent for the period from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2016 Adopted by Waterfront Auckland Board on 26 June 2013 Page | 1 Tamaki – kainga nga ika me nga wheua katoa! Auckland – where the fish are so succulent you can eat them bones and all! This proverb alludes to the once abundant and sought after marine resources of Auckland’s waterfront. It signals Waterfront Auckland’s desire to create a sustainable waterfront providing for the current and future generations of Aucklanders. A place all Aucklanders can access the Waitemata Harbour for recreation, business or cultural practices. 2 Document Control Document Waterfront Auckland Statement of Intent for the period from Project Title 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2016 U:\CCO\Waterfront Development Agency\Finance\SOI and AP File Name / Path extract\2013-2016 SOI\2013.06.25 SOI 2013-2016 - FINAL.docx Version No. 5.0 Status Final Document Author Aimee Comer History Version Issue Date Author Notes / Changes 1.0 13.12.12 A. Comer 2.0 19.02.13 A. Comer Board feedback incorporated 3.0 28.02.13 A. Comer Further Board feedback incorporated 4.0 19.06.13 A. Comer Shareholder feedback incorporated 5.0 25.06.13 A. Comer Final Board amendments incorporated Document Review Name Signature Date Stephen Rainbow (GM Strategy) 17.06.2013 John Dalzell (CEO) 19.02.2013 Waterfront Auckland Board 26.02.2013 Auckland Council CCO Monitoring Unit 30.04.2013 Document Approval Name Signature Date John Dalzell 24.06.2013 Waterfront Auckland Board 26.06.2013
  • Rugby World Cup 2011: Evaluation Report Message from the Chief Executive

    Rugby World Cup 2011: Evaluation Report Message from the Chief Executive

    RUGBY WORLD CUP 2011: EVALUATION REPORT MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE December 2011 It has only been a few months since Auckland was the hub of Rugby World Cup 2011, but our region has been transformed forever. Most of us hold extremely fond memories of the tournament itself, the numerous events surrounding it which showcased Auckland to the world, and, of course, the result, with the All Blacks winning the cup for the first time since 1987. I am very pleased to present this evaluation report on RWC 2011 and Auckland’s role in the hosting of it. It is a largely independent report, with three external consultants led by Sapere conducting the evaluation, along with Market Economics and Gravitas. Evaluations have also been incorporated from lead agencies Auckland Council, Auckland Transport, Auckland Tourism, Events and Economic Development (ATEED), Regional Facilities Auckland (RFA) and Waterfront Auckland. Overall this evaluation is very favourable and commends the efforts of the multiple agencies involved in the hosting of 15 matches in Auckland over the six weeks. Almost 750,000 fans attended matches at the two Auckland stadiums, Eden Park and North Harbour Stadium. RWC 2011 was a world-class experience for the estimated 107,000 domestic and international visitors who visited the city and an invaluable opportunity to establish Auckland as a desirable major events destination. Consider the fact that the Auckland Council Group delivered around 139 individual projects to carry out the city’s role in hosting RWC 2011. We learned lessons from every single one of them - 99 per cent of which were positive, some which showed opportunities for improvement.