Spiny Lobster Annual Catch Limits and Targets and Recreational Trap

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spiny Lobster Annual Catch Limits and Targets and Recreational Trap 7/11/2017 Modifications to Management Benchmarks, Annual Catch Limit, Annual Catch Target, and Prohibition of Traps for Recreational Harvest in the South Atlantic Exclusive Economic Zone FINAL REGULATORY AMENDMENT 4 TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SPINY LOBSTER IN THE GULF OF MEXICO AND THE SOUTH ATLANTIC INCLUDING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW, AND REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ACT ANALYSIS JULY 2017 This is a publication of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA15NMF4410011. This page intentionally left blank ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT COVER SHEET Modifications to Management Benchmarks, Annual Catch Limit, Annual Catch Target, and Prohibition of Traps for Recreational Harvest in the South Atlantic Exclusive Economic Zone Including Environmental Assessment, Regulatory Impact Review, and Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis Type of Action ( ) Administrative ( ) Legislative ( ) Draft (X) Final Responsible Agencies: National Marine Fisheries Service Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Southeast Regional Office Council 263 13th Avenue South 2203 North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100 St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 Tampa, Florida 33607 727-824-5305 813-348-1630 727-824-5308 (fax) 813-348-1711 (fax) http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov http://www.gulfcouncil.org Contact: Cynthia Meyer Contact: Morgan Kilgour [email protected] [email protected] Contact: Nikhil Mehta [email protected] South Atlantic Fishery Management Council 4055 Faber Place Dr., Suite 201 North Charleston, SC 29405 843-571-4366 www.safmc.net Contact: Kari MacLauchlin [email protected] Spiny Lobster Modifications to ACL, Regulatory Amendment 4 Review Trigger, and Trap Prohibition i ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT ABC acceptable biological catch ACL annual catch limit ACT annual catch target ALS Accumulated Landings System AM accountability measure AP advisory panel ASMFC Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission CFR code of federal regulations Councils Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic Fishery Management Councils CS consumer surplus DPS distinct population segment EA environmental assessment EEZ exclusive economic zone EFH essential fish habitat EIS environmental impact statement EJ environmental justice E.O. Executive Order EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act F fishing mortality rate FAC Florida administrative code FEUS Fisheries Economics of the United States FMP fishery management plan FMSY fishing mortality rate at maximum sustainable yield FWC Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWRI Fish and Wildlife Research Institute GMFMC Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council GSMFC Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Gulf Gulf of Mexico Gulf Council Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council HAPC Habitat Area of Particular Concern Magnuson-Stevens Act Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act MFMT maximum fishing mortality threshold MMPA Marine Mammal Protection Agency mp million pounds MRIP Marine Recreational Information Program MSY maximum sustainable yield NARW north Atlantic right whales NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency NWA northwest Atlantic OFL overfishing limit PDARP Programmatic Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan Review Panel Spiny Lobster Review Panel Spiny Lobster Modifications to ACL, Regulatory Amendment 4 Review Trigger, and Trap Prohibition ii RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act RQ regional quotient SAFMC South Atlantic Fishery Management Council SEDAR Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review SERO Southeast Regional Office Spiny Lobster FMP Fishery Management Plan for the Spiny Lobster Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic South Atlantic Council South Atlantic Fishery Management Council SPR spawning potential ratio SSC Scientific and Statistical Committee USCG United States Coast Guard ww whole weight Spiny Lobster Modifications to ACL, Regulatory Amendment 4 Review Trigger, and Trap Prohibition iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Environmental Assessment Cover Sheet ......................................................................................... i Abbreviations Used in this Document ............................................................................................ ii Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ vii List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. viii Chapter 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................. 4 1.3 History of Management ........................................................................................................ 5 Chapter 2. Management Alternatives ............................................................................................ 8 2.1. Action 1: Modify the Current Definitions of Management Benchmarks ........................... 8 Action 1.1: Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) and Overfishing Threshold (Maximum Fishing Mortality Threshold [MFMT]) ................................................................................ 8 Action 1.2: Modify the ACL and ACT for Spiny Lobster ........................................................ 11 2.2 Action 2: Prohibit the Use of Traps for Recreational Harvest of Spiny Lobster in the South Atlantic Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) ......................................................................... 13 Chapter 3. Affected Environment ................................................................................................ 16 3.1 Description of the Fishery ................................................................................................. 16 3.2 Description of the Physical Environment .......................................................................... 19 3.3 Description of the Biological/Ecological Environment ..................................................... 21 3.3.1 Bycatch ..................................................................................................................... 23 3.3.2 Protected Species ...................................................................................................... 24 3.4 Description of the Economic Environment ........................................................................ 25 3.4.1 Commercial Fishing Sector....................................................................................... 25 3.3.2 Recreational Fishing Sector ...................................................................................... 33 3.5 Description of the Social Environment ............................................................................. 34 3.5.1 Fishing Communities ................................................................................................ 34 3.5.2 Environmental Justice Considerations ...................................................................... 40 3.6 Description of the Administrative Environment ............................................................... 42 3.6.1 Federal Fishery Management .................................................................................... 42 3.6.2 State Fishery Management ........................................................................................ 43 Chapter 4. Environmental Consequences ..................................................................................... 45 Spiny Lobster Modifications to ACL, Regulatory Amendment 4 Review Trigger, and Trap Prohibition iv 4.1 Action 1.1: Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) and Overfishing Threshold (Maximum Fishing Mortality Threshold [MFMT]) .............................................................................. 45 4.1.1 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Physical and Biological Environments ............... 45 4.1.2 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Economic Environment ...................................... 47 4.1.3 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Social Environment ............................................ 47 4.1.4 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Administrative Environment .............................. 48 4.2 Action 1.2: Modify the Annual Catch Limit (ACL) and Annual Catch Target (ACT) for Spiny Lobster ..................................................................................................................... 49 4.2.1 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Physical and Biological Environments ................... 49 4.2.2 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Economic Environment ...................................... 50 4.2.3 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Social Environment ............................................ 52 4.2.4 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Administrative Environment .............................. 53 4.3 Action 2: Prohibit the Use of Traps for Recreational Harvest of Spiny Lobster in the South Atlantic Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) ........................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Lobsters-Identification, World Distribution, and U.S. Trade
    Lobsters-Identification, World Distribution, and U.S. Trade AUSTIN B. WILLIAMS Introduction tons to pounds to conform with US. tinents and islands, shoal platforms, and fishery statistics). This total includes certain seamounts (Fig. 1 and 2). More­ Lobsters are valued throughout the clawed lobsters, spiny and flat lobsters, over, the world distribution of these world as prime seafood items wherever and squat lobsters or langostinos (Tables animals can also be divided rougWy into they are caught, sold, or consumed. 1 and 2). temperate, subtropical, and tropical Basically, three kinds are marketed for Fisheries for these animals are de­ temperature zones. From such partition­ food, the clawed lobsters (superfamily cidedly concentrated in certain areas of ing, the following facts regarding lob­ Nephropoidea), the squat lobsters the world because of species distribu­ ster fisheries emerge. (family Galatheidae), and the spiny or tion, and this can be recognized by Clawed lobster fisheries (superfamily nonclawed lobsters (superfamily noting regional and species catches. The Nephropoidea) are concentrated in the Palinuroidea) . Food and Agriculture Organization of temperate North Atlantic region, al­ The US. market in clawed lobsters is the United Nations (FAO) has divided though there is minor fishing for them dominated by whole living American the world into 27 major fishing areas for in cooler waters at the edge of the con­ lobsters, Homarus americanus, caught the purpose of reporting fishery statis­ tinental platform in the Gul f of Mexico, off the northeastern United States and tics. Nineteen of these are marine fish­ Caribbean Sea (Roe, 1966), western southeastern Canada, but certain ing areas, but lobster distribution is South Atlantic along the coast of Brazil, smaller species of clawed lobsters from restricted to only 14 of them, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • A Time Series of California Spiny Lobster (Panulirus Interruptus) Phyllosoma from 1951 to 2008 Links Abundance to Warm Oceanogr
    KOSLOW ET AL.: LOBSTER PHYLLOSOMA ABUNDANCE LINKED TO WARM CONDITIONS CalCOFI Rep., Vol. 53, 2012 A TIME SERIES OF CALIFORNIA SPINY LOBSTER (PANULIRUS INTERRUPTUS) PHYLLOSOMA FROM 1951 TO 2008 LINKS ABUNDANCE TO WARM OCEANOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA J. ANTHONY KOSLOW LauRA ROGERS-BENNETT DOUGLAS J. NEILSON Scripps Institution of Oceanography California Department of Fish and Game California Department of Fish and Game University of California, S.D. Bodega Marine Laboratory 4949 Viewridge Avenue La Jolla, CA 92093-0218 UC Davis, 2099 Westside Rd. San Diego, CA 92123 ph: (858) 534-7284 Bodega Bay, CA 94923-0247 [email protected] ABSTRACT The California spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus) population is the basis for a valuable commercial and recreational fishery off southern California, yet little is known about its population dynamics. Studies based on CalCOFI sampling in the 1950s indicated that the abun- dance of phyllosoma larvae may be sensitive to ocean- ographic conditions such as El Niño events. To further study the potential influence of environmental variabil- ity and the fishery on lobster productivity, we developed a 60-year time series of the abundance of lobster phyl- losoma from the historical CalCOFI sample collection. Phyllosoma were removed from the midsummer cruises when the early-stage larvae are most abundant in the plankton nearshore. We found that the abundance of the early-stage phyllosoma displayed considerable inter- annual variability but was significantly positively corre- Figure 1. Commercial (solid circles), recreational (open triangles), and total lated with El Niño events, mean sea-surface temperature, landings (solid line) of spiny lobster off southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Spiny Lobsters Reduce the Catchability of Small Conspecifics
    Vol. 666: 99–113, 2021 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published May 20 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13695 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPEN ACCESS Size matters: large spiny lobsters reduce the catchability of small conspecifics Emma-Jade Tuffley1,2,3,*, Simon de Lestang2, Jason How2, Tim Langlois1,3 1School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia 2Aquatic Science and Assessment, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, 39 Northside Drive, Hillarys, WA 6025, Australia 3The UWA Oceans Institute, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, Cnr. of Fairway and Service Road 4, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia ABSTRACT: Indices of lobster abundance and population demography are often derived from pot catch rate data and rely upon constant catchability. However, there is evidence in clawed lobsters, and some spiny lobsters, that catchability is affected by conspecifics present in pots, and that this effect is sex- and size-dependent. For the first time, this study investigated this effect in Panulirus cyg nus, an economically important spiny lobster species endemic to Western Australia. Three studies: (1) aquaria trials, (2) pot seeding experiments, and (3) field surveys, were used to investi- gate how the presence of large male and female conspecifics influence catchability in smaller, immature P. cygnus. Large P. cygnus generally reduced the catchability of small conspecifics; large males by 26−33% and large females by 14−27%. The effect of large females was complex and varied seasonally, dependent on the sex of the small lobster. Conspecific-related catchability should be a vital consideration when interpreting the results of pot-based surveys, especially if population demo graphy changes.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Pathogenic Virus in the Caribbean Spiny Lobster Panulirus Argus from the Florida Keys
    DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Vol. 59: 109–118, 2004 Published May 5 Dis Aquat Org A new pathogenic virus in the Caribbean spiny lobster Panulirus argus from the Florida Keys Jeffrey D. Shields1,*, Donald C. Behringer Jr2 1Virginia Institute of Marine Science, The College of William & Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062, USA 2Department of Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23529, USA ABSTRACT: A pathogenic virus was diagnosed from juvenile Caribbean spiny lobsters Panulirus argus from the Florida Keys. Moribund lobsters had characteristically milky hemolymph that did not clot. Altered hyalinocytes and semigranulocytes, but not granulocytes, were observed with light microscopy. Infected hemocytes had emarginated, condensed chromatin, hypertrophied nuclei and faint eosinophilic Cowdry-type-A inclusions. In some cases, infected cells were observed in soft con- nective tissues. With electron microscopy, unenveloped, nonoccluded, icosahedral virions (182 ± 9 nm SD) were diffusely spread around the inner periphery of the nuclear envelope. Virions also occurred in loose aggregates in the cytoplasm or were free in the hemolymph. Assembly of the nucleocapsid occurred entirely within the nucleus of the infected cells. Within the virogenic stroma, blunt rod-like structures or whorls of electron-dense granular material were apparently associated with viral assembly. The prevalence of overt infections, defined as lethargic animals with milky hemolymph, ranged from 6 to 8% with certain foci reaching prevalences of 37%. The disease was transmissible to uninfected lobsters using inoculations of raw hemolymph from infected animals. Inoculated animals became moribund 5 to 7 d before dying and they began dying after 30 to 80 d post-exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Region 2016 Year in Review
    MARINE REGION 2016 YEAR IN REVIEW Cavanaugh Gulch, near Elk in northern California photo by K. Joe A Message From Craig Shuman, Marine Region Manager Most of us have experienced déjà vu – that strong feeling on the beach by the hundreds of thousands and reports of familiarity with an experience or event, as though we of sea turtles more at home off the Galapagos. State have already experienced it in the past. For Marine Region record-sized tuna continued to be logged into the books staff, many of the events in 2016 had that same strong by anglers and spear fishermen, besting old records by as feeling of familiarity. much as 80 pounds or more. Elevated levels of domoic acid As the offshore environment continued to impact California’s continued to experience rapid wildlife and fisheries, keeping Marine Region Mission: change, Marine Region staff were commercial crabbers tied to the To protect, maintain, enhance, there monitoring, meeting with the dock for part of the season and public, and developing strategies recreational razor clammers off the and restore California’s to help better understand how beaches of northern California for marine ecosystems for their the changes would affect the much of the year. The commercial ecological values and their marine environment and our sardine fishery remained closed fisheries. Statewide, our biologists for its second year and the use and enjoyment by the and analysts were busy studying, combined effects of drought and public through good science monitoring, and assessing fish and poor ocean conditions impacted and effective communication. shellfish populations, including recreational and commercial abalone, halibut (California and salmon catches.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. CALIFORNIA SPINY LOBSTER Overview of the Fishery In
    4. CALIFORNIA SPINY LOBSTER Overview of the Fishery In California waters, the spiny lobster, Panulirus interruptus, occurs in shallow, rocky coastal areas from Point Conception (Santa Barbara County) to the U.S.-Mexico border, and off southern California islands and banks. Lobster fishing season runs from early October to mid-March. More lobster is taken by the commercial and sport fisheries in October than in any other month. Effort and landings drop sharply in January, and continue to decline through mid-March when the season ends. Currently, most of the lobsters landed in the commercial fishery weigh between 1.25 and 2.0 lb. Lobsters in this weight range produce the tail size desired by the export market and restaurant trade. Lobster fishermen are paid between $6.75 and $8.00 per lb for their catch, most of which is exported to French and Asian markets. However, depressed markets overseas have resulted in efforts to re-establish domestic markets. Southern California has supported a spiny lobster fishery since the late 1800s. At that time, spiny lobsters weighed between 3.5 and 4 lb on average, and were so abundant that a single person could catch 500 lb in just two hours. By 1900, legislation was enacted to protect dwindling spiny lobster stocks. A closed season and a size limit were instituted, and take of egg-bearing females was prohibited. Despite legislation, abundance continued to decline. As a result, the fishery was closed for two years (1909 and 1910). When the fishery re-opened in 1911, spiny lobsters were once again abundant.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribbean Spiny Lobster Brazil Pots
    Caribbean spiny lobster Panulirus argus ©Scandinavian Fishing Yearbook/www.scandposters.com Brazil Pots December 19, 2018 Seafood Watch Consulting Researcher Disclaimer Seafood Watch® strives to have all Seafood Reports reviewed for accuracy and completeness by external scientists with expertise in ecology, fisheries science and aquaculture. Scientific review, however, does not constitute an endorsement of the Seafood Watch program or its recommendations on the part of the reviewing scientists. Seafood Watch is solely responsible for the conclusions reached in this report. Seafood Watch Standard used in this assessment: Standard for Fisheries vF3 Table of Contents About. Seafood. .Watch . 3. Guiding. .Principles . 4. Summary. 5. Final. Seafood. .Recommendations . 7. Introduction. 8. Assessment. 12. Criterion. 1:. .Impacts . on. the. Species. Under. Assessment. .12 . Criterion. 2:. .Impacts . on. Other. Species. .19 . Criterion. 3:. .Management . Effectiveness. .25 . Criterion. 4:. .Impacts . on. the. Habitat. .and . Ecosystem. .30 . Acknowledgements. 34. References. 35. Appendix. A:. Extra. .By . Catch. .Species . 41. 2 About Seafood Watch Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from www.seafoodwatch.org. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (393Kb)
    The status of the California spiny lobster resource Item Type monograph Authors Duffy, John M. Publisher California Department of Fish and Game Download date 02/10/2021 12:57:43 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/18570 .. STATUS OF mE SPINY LOBSTER ) by John M. Duffy Marine Resources Region . , '!. MARINE RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 10 California Department of Fish and Game 1973 J ) CALIFO.RNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME MARINE RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORTS ****************************************************** Marine Resources Technical Reports are research documents by Department personnel that are of sufficient importance to be preserved, but which for. some rea.son are not appropriate for primary scientific publication. No restriction is placed on subject matter. These Rep~)1:ts luay be cited in publication, but care should be taken to indicate' their manuscript status. The material in these Reports may. eventually appear in the primary scientific literature. Inquiries concerning the Reports should be directed to The Editor, Marine Resources Region, 350 Golden Shor·e, • Long Beach, California 9080Z. 'f. .,., ..... , ~. ) (2) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page UISTORY OF THE FISHERY •••••••••••••••• •• 5 BIOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• 8 DISCUSSION .. •••••••• • • • • • •• • • • • •• • • 11 unmmas . • • ...... .. .... 13 ) • of. I, I ) (3) STATUS OF THE SPINY LOBSTER ) by • John M. Duffy HISTORY OF THE FISHERY Conunercial The records of legal landing of spiny lobster, panu'Lil'US inteITUptus have been maintained by the Department from 1916 to the present (Table 1). Briefly, the annual catches between 1918 and 1943 averaged around 300,000 lbs, with a high of 508,000 lbs in 1927 and a low of 169,000 in 1942. From 1943 to 1950 there was a dramatic increase in landing, peaking at 933,000 lbs in 1950.
    [Show full text]
  • California Spiny Lobster Scientific Name: Panulirus Interruptus Range
    Fishery-at-a-Glance: California Spiny Lobster Scientific Name: Panulirus interruptus Range: Spiny Lobster range from Monterey, California southward to at least as far as Magdalena Bay, Baja California. The physical center of the range is within Mexico, and population density and fishery productivity is highest in this area. Habitat: As juveniles (less than 3 years of age), Spiny Lobster live in coastal rubble beds, but as adults, they are found on hard bottomed or rocky-reef habitat kelp forests. Size (length and weight): Adult Spiny Lobsters average 2 pounds in weight and about 12 inches total length, with males slightly larger than females. Adults more than 5 pounds are currently considered trophy individuals, although records exist from a century ago of 26 pound, 3 foot long lobsters. Life span: Spiny Lobsters can live up to 30 to 50 years. Reproduction: Spiny Lobsters mature at about 5 years of age, or 2.5-inch carapace length. They have a complex, 2-year reproductive cycle from mating to the settlement of juvenile lobsters. Fecundity increases with size, and females produce one brood of eggs per year. Prey: Spiny Lobsters are omnivorous, and act as important keystone predators within the southern California nearshore ecosystem. Adults forage at night for algae, fish, and many marine invertebrates. Predators: Predators of juvenile Spiny Lobsters include California Sheephead, Cabezon, rockfishes, Kelp Bass, Giant Sea Bass, and octopus. Predators of adult lobsters tend to be the larger individuals such as male California Sheephead and Giant Sea Bass. Fishery: The commercial fishery accounted for approximately 312 metric tons (688,000 lb) in ex- vessel landings and $12.7 million in ex-vessel value during the 2017-2018 fishing season.
    [Show full text]
  • Homarus Americanus H
    BioInvasions Records (2021) Volume 10, Issue 1: 170–180 CORRECTED PROOF Rapid Communication An American in the Aegean: first record of the American lobster Homarus americanus H. Milne Edwards, 1837 from the eastern Mediterranean Sea Thodoros E. Kampouris1,*, Georgios A. Gkafas2, Joanne Sarantopoulou2, Athanasios Exadactylos2 and Ioannis E. Batjakas1 1Marine Sciences Department, School of the Environment, University of the Aegean, University Hill, Mytilene, Lesvos Island, 81100, Greece 2Department of Ichthyology & Aquatic Environment, School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Thessaly, Fytoko Street, Volos, 38 445, Greece Author e-mails: [email protected] (TEK), [email protected] (IEB), [email protected] (GAG), [email protected] (JS), [email protected] (AE) *Corresponding author Citation: Kampouris TE, Gkafas GA, Sarantopoulou J, Exadactylos A, Batjakas Abstract IE (2021) An American in the Aegean: first record of the American lobster A male Homarus americanus individual, commonly known as the American lobster, Homarus americanus H. Milne Edwards, was caught by artisanal fishermen at Chalkidiki Peninsula, Greece, north-west Aegean 1837 from the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Sea on 26 August 2019. The individual weighted 628.1 g and measured 96.7 mm in BioInvasions Records 10(1): 170–180, carapace length (CL) and 31.44 cm in total length (TL). The specimen was identified https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2021.10.1.18 by both morphological and molecular means. This is the species’ first record from Received: 7 June 2020 the eastern Mediterranean Sea and Greece, and only the second for the whole basin. Accepted: 16 October 2020 However, several hypotheses for potential introduction vectors are discussed, as Published: 21 December 2020 well as the potential implication to the regional lobster fishery.
    [Show full text]
  • California Spiny Lobster, Panulirus Interruptus
    1 California Spiny Lobster, Panulirus interruptus California spiny lobster, Panulirus interruptus. Credit: D Stein, CDFW. History of the Fishery California spiny lobster, Panulirus interruptus, have been fished in southern California since at least 1872. The commercial fishery originated in Santa Barbara County and expanded as the number of fishermen increased. By 1900, the fishery encompassed the entire Southern California Bight (SCB) and most of the offshore islands. Today’s lobster population is the product of a century of commercial fishing with few areas historically off limits to fishermen. Over the decades commercial landings have fluctuated, reaching a high in the early 1950s, followed by a decline until the mid 1970s (Figure 1-1). There were multiple reasons for this decline, but a major contributing factor was the landing of sub-legal size (short) lobster. Recognizing this problem, in 1957 the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) implemented a minimum 2 inch by 4 inch (5 centimeter by 10.2 centimeter) mesh size requirement for commercial traps specifically to reduce the taking of short lobster. However, this gear requirement did not fully solve the problem. Consequently, in 1976, the Department required an escape port in all commercial traps. The size of this horizontal escape port enables a short lobster to freely exit the trap. Requiring escape ports addressed the immediate problem of landing short lobster and initiated the rebuilding of the spawning stock, allowing for an associated increase in the number of legal size lobster entering the fishery. Beginning in 1976, total landings improved each season (October through March), reaching a high of 952,000 pounds (432 metric tons) during the 1997/98 season.
    [Show full text]
  • Modifications to the Spiny Lobster Gear Requirements And
    Tab K, No. 5 5/21/2018 Modifications to the Spiny Lobster Gear Requirements and Cooperative Management Procedures Photo credit Ben Gutzler Public Hearing Draft Amendment 13 to the Fishery Management Plan for Spiny Lobster in the Gulf of Mexico and the South Atlantic Including Environmental Assessment, Fishery Impact Statement, Regulatory Impact Review, and Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis June 2018 This is a publication of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA15NMF4410011. This page intentionally left blank ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT COVER SHEET Type of Action ( ) Administrative ( ) Legislative (X) Draft ( ) Final Responsible Agencies: National Marine Fisheries Service Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Southeast Regional Office Council 263 13th Avenue South 2203 North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100 St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 Tampa, Florida 33607 727-824-5305 813-348-1630 727-824-5308 (fax) 813-348-1711 (fax) http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov http://www.gulfcouncil.org Contact: Kelli O’Donnell Contact: Morgan Kilgour [email protected] [email protected] Contact: Nikhil Mehta [email protected] South Atlantic Fishery Management Council 4055 Faber Place Dr., Suite 201 North Charleston, SC 29405 843-571-4366 www.safmc.net Contact: Christina Wiegand [email protected] Spiny Lobster Bully Net Fishing And Protocols and Procedures i ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT ABC acceptable biological catch ACCSP Atlantic Coastal Cooperatives Statistics Program ACL annual catch limit ACT annual catch target AM accountability measure AP advisory panel ASMFC Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission BEA US Bureau of Economic Analysis BiOp biological opinion C crawfish license CD commercial dive permit CFR Code of Federal Regulations CN bully net permit Councils Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic Fishery Management Councils DPS distinct population segments EA environmental assessment EEZ exclusive economic zone EFH essential fish habitat EIS environmental impact statement E.O.
    [Show full text]