Lower Hunter Koala Study Final

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lower Hunter Koala Study Final Lower Hunter Koala Study Final Funded by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population, and Communities through the Sustainable Regional Development Program June 2013 Lower Hunter Koala Study DOCUMENT TRACKING ITEM DETAIL Project Name Lower Hunter Koala Study Project Number 12SYDNRM-003 Robert Mezzatesta Project Manager PO Box 20529 World Square, NSW 2002 (02) 8536 8650 Prepared by Sophie Powrie, Daniel McKenzie, Andrea Sabella, Mark Walton, Steve Ward Approved by SW Status FINAL Version Number 1 Last saved on 19 June 2013 Koala photo from 2004 Port Stephens Community Monitoring Survey; Expert Koala Cover photos Workshop Feb 2013, Newcastle; Map of Data Audit Results Point Koala Records @ February 2013, ELA This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2013. Lower Hunter Koala Study. Prepared for Dept Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities’. Creative Commons This report is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with support from Paul Keighley and Alistair Cockburn, SEWPaC. We gratefully acknowledge the input of the expert workshop participants; Anthony Marchment (PSC), Dan Lunney (OEH), David Paull (PSC), Geoff Bartlett (HKPS), Indrie Miller (OEH), Lucas Grenadier (OEH), Mark Roselle (PSC), Paul Keighley (SEWPaC), Ray Williams (Ecotone) and Robbie Economos (LMCC). Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA P T Y L T D i Lower Hunter Koala Study Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Context ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Study Brief .................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Methods....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Overview....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Existing knowledge of Koala populations and habitat in the Lower Hunter ................................. 5 2.3 Stakeholder Consultation ............................................................................................................. 6 2.4 Koala Habitat modelling................................................................................................................ 6 3 Results....................................................................................................................................... 14 3.1 Koala Ecology............................................................................................................................. 14 3.2 Historical Distribution in the Lower Hunter ................................................................................. 15 3.3 Present Population Distribution .................................................................................................. 15 3.4 Tree species ............................................................................................................................... 17 3.5 Habitat modelling........................................................................................................................ 17 3.5.1 Model Limitations........................................................................................................................ 26 4 Discussion................................................................................................................................. 27 4.1 What is the current population number of koalas in the Lower Hunter region? ......................... 27 4.2 What is the rate of change in this population and has this rate changed? What are the major and minor causes behind this?................................................................................................... 27 4.3 What criteria should be used to identify high priority habitat areas?.......................................... 27 4.4 What is the current extent and quality of koala habitat in the region? ....................................... 28 4.5 What are the local key threatening processes and recommended conservation measures for koalas to assist with decision making for the Lower Hunter Regional Strategy and Regional Conservation Plan? .................................................................................................................... 29 5 Conclusions and Recommendations ..................................................................................... 32 6 References ................................................................................................................................ 34 Appendix A............................................................................................................................................. 39 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA P T Y L T D ii Lower Hunter Koala Study Abbreviations ABBREVIATION DESCRIPTION CKPoM Comprehensive Koala Plan of Management ERIN Environmental Resource Information Network GDE Groundwater Dependent Ecosystem GHM Greater Hunter Mapping (version 4 by NSW Office of Environment and Heritage) GIS Geographical Information System HKPS Hunter Koala Preservation Society LGA Local Government Area LH Lower Hunter LM Lake Macquarie NATF Native Animal Trust Fund OEH NSW Office of Environment and Heritage PSC Port Stephens Council SEWPaC Dept Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA P T Y L T D iii Lower Hunter Koala Study Executive Summary This study was commissioned by the Department of Sustainability Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPaC) to contribute to regional sustainability planning that will lead into a strategic assessment of future development in the Lower Hunter region under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). The study area included the Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Cessnock, Lake Macquarie, Maitland, Newcastle, and Port Stephens. This study utilises existing data available in the public domain to inform specific key information gaps regarding conservation planning needs of the koala in the Lower Hunter. The koala is listed as a vulnerable species in NSW under the EPBC Act and the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (TSC Act). The koala population at Port Stephens is a high profile one, and considerable research work has been undertaken within the LGA, but nevertheless, there remain information gaps for this area. The level of knowledge of the koala within the other LGA’s in the study area is poor, with much less information available for this study. Due to these data limitations, it is not possible to provide a reliable population estimate of the koala for the Lower Hunter region. Within Port Stephens, where more data is available, the koala population is estimated to be between 350 and 500 individuals (Phillips et al. 1996). A number of koala sightings have been recorded in the Cessnock and Lake Macquarie LGAs, but population size(s) are unknown. It is similarly not possible to reliably estimate rate of change of koala populations within the region. However anecdotal observations from Port Stephens LGA suggest that changes in koala numbers are not uniform, with some areas decreasing and one population at Boat Harbour/One Mile reported to be increasing. The current extent and quality of habitat across the Lower Hunter was modelled as part of this study, based on input from an expert workshop and a GIS modelling process. The resulting outputs were converted to low, moderate, high and very high koala habitat rankings. The greatest areas of very high and high ranked habitat were mapped in Port Stephens, Cessnock, and Lake Macquarie LGA’s. The Newcastle and Maitland LGA’s contained very little priority habitat and may therefore act as a barrier to koala movements in between population(s) in the Port Stephens LGA and Cessnock / Lake Macquarie LGA’s. A range of key threatening processes for the koala within the Lower Hunter study area were identified including (but not limited to): loss, fragmentation and degradation of habitat both at a fine and large scale; barriers to habitat connectivity (including natural and manmade structures); road fatalities; predation by dogs; disease (Chlamydia and other diseases); fire (including both control burns and natural fire); climate change; and groundwater abstraction (where it impacts on koala habitat). Conserving patches of greater than 100 ha with koala feed and
Recommended publications
  • Kooragang Wetlands: Retrospective of an Integrated Ecological Restoration Project in the Hunter River Estuary
    KOORAGANG WETLANDS: RETROSPECTIVE OF AN INTEGRATED ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION PROJECT IN THE HUNTER RIVER ESTUARY P Svoboda Hunter Local Land Services, Paterson NSW Introduction: At first glance, the Hunter River estuary near Newcastle NSW is a land of contradictions. It is home to one of the world’s largest coal ports and a large industrial complex as well as being the location of a large internationally significant wetland. The remarkable natural productivity of the Hunter estuary at the time of European settlement is well documented. Also well documented are the degradation and loss of fisheries and other wildlife habitat in the estuary due to over 200 years of draining, filling, dredging and clearing (Williams et al., 2000). However, in spite of extensive modification, natural systems of the estuary retained enough value and function for large areas to be transformed by restoration activities that aimed to show industry and environmental conservation could work together to their mutual benefit. By establishing partnerships and taking a collaborative and adaptive approach, the project was able to implement restoration and related activities on a landscape basis, working across land ownership and management boundaries (Kooragang Wetland Rehabilitation Project, 2010). The Kooragang Wetland Rehabilitation Project (KWRP) was launched in 1993 to help compensate for the loss of fisheries and other wildlife habitat at suitable sites in the Hunter estuary. This paper revisits the expectations and planning for the project as presented in a paper to the INTECOL’s V international wetlands conference in 1996 (Svoboda and Copeland, 1998), reviews the project’s activities, describes outcomes and summarises issues faced and lessons learnt during 24 years of implementing a large, long-term, integrated, adaptive and community-assisted ecological restoration project.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunter Valley: Coal Seam Gas Exclusion Zones Submission 8 November 2013
    Director Assessment Policy, Systems & Stakeholder Engagement Department of Planning and Infrastructure Hunter Valley: Coal Seam Gas Exclusion Zones Submission 8 November 2013 Coal Seam Gas Exclusion Zones Submission: Hunter Valley This page was intentionally left blank 2 Coal Seam Gas Exclusion Zones Submission: Hunter Valley Foreword Closing the loop on CSG Mining in the Hunter Valley When it comes to coal seam gas (CSG) mining, protecting Australia’s most visited wine tourism region in its entirety - not in parts - is of paramount importance. And the time to do it is now. The NSW State Government should be recognised for delivering on its pre-election promises to preserve the Hunter Valley wine tourism region from CSG mining by confirming exclusion zones around the villages of Broke and Bulga as well as around significant areas defined as Viticulture Critical Industry Clusters (VCIC). But protecting most of the region, while leaving several critical areas open for CSG exploration and mining, could have devastating consequences for the iconic Hunter region as a whole – and undo the Government’s efforts thus far. While mining is obviously a legitimate land use and an important revenue source, this can’t justify allowing mining activities in areas where other existing, profitable industries would be adversely affected. Put simply, winemaking, tourism and CSG mining are not compatible land uses. The popularity and reputation of the Hunter Valley wine tourism region is fundamentally connected to the area’s natural beauty and landscape – and that natural beauty will fast disappear if the countryside is peppered with unsightly gas wells. Research reveals 80%1 of Hunter Valley visitors don’t want to see gas wells in the wine and tourism region, with 70%2 saying if gas wells are established they’ll just stop coming.
    [Show full text]
  • A Growth Agenda for the Hunter Drivers of Population Growth
    A growth agenda for the Hunter Drivers of population growth A report prepared for the Hunter Joint Organisation of Councils Dr Kim Johnstone, Associate Director Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Greater Newcastle and the Hunter region ........................................................................................... 2 Drivers of population change ........................................................................................................... 3 Population growth ............................................................................................................................ 3 Age profile ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Drivers of growth .............................................................................................................................. 6 Understanding migration.................................................................................................................. 8 Internal migration ............................................................................................................................. 8 Overseas migration .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hunter Investment Prospectus 2016 the Hunter Region, Nsw Invest in Australia’S Largest Regional Economy
    HUNTER INVESTMENT PROSPECTUS 2016 THE HUNTER REGION, NSW INVEST IN AUSTRALIA’S LARGEST REGIONAL ECONOMY Australia’s largest Regional economy - $38.5 billion Connected internationally - airport, seaport, national motorways,rail Skilled and flexible workforce Enviable lifestyle Contact: RDA Hunter Suite 3, 24 Beaumont Street, Hamilton NSW 2303 Phone: +61 2 4940 8355 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rdahunter.org.au AN INITIATIVE OF FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT WELCOMES CONTENTS Federal and State Government Welcomes 4 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Australia’s future depends on the strength of our regions and their ability to Introducing the Hunter progress as centres of productivity and innovation, and as vibrant places to live. 7 History and strengths The Hunter Region has great natural endowments, and a community that has shown great skill and adaptability in overcoming challenges, and in reinventing and Economic Strength and Diversification diversifying its economy. RDA Hunter has made a great contribution to these efforts, and 12 the 2016 Hunter Investment Prospectus continues this fine work. The workforce, major industries and services The prospectus sets out a clear blueprint of the Hunter’s future direction as a place to invest, do business, and to live. Infrastructure and Development 42 Major projects, transport, port, airports, utilities, industrial areas and commercial develpoment I commend RDA Hunter for a further excellent contribution to the progress of its region. Education & Training 70 The Hon Warren Truss MP Covering the extensive services available in the Hunter Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development Innovation and Creativity 74 How the Hunter is growing it’s reputation as a centre of innovation and creativity Living in the Hunter 79 STATE GOVERNMENT Community and lifestyle in the Hunter The Hunter is the biggest contributor to the NSW economy outside of Sydney and a jewel in NSW’s rich Business Organisations regional crown.
    [Show full text]
  • Vines, Wine & Identity
    Vines, Wine & Identity Project partners newsletter Issue 4 | December 2015 | Faculty of Education and Arts Welcome It has been a challenging end to 2015 for grape project, Pauline has provided access to the Journal growers in Pokolbin with hail in mid-December of the Hungerford & Associated Families Society, destroying as much as a third of this year’s crop published since 1999, which contains material on in some vineyards. With this in mind, in addition to Pokolbin wine families from the colonial era. This warm greetings for the festive season, the project complements research by Jack Sullivan of the team extends wishes for ideal weather conditions Paterson Historical Society on colonial wine families for the remainder of the growth season across the in that district. Hunter region. Jim Fitz-Gerald from Kelman Estate has also As the calendar year draws to a close, the Vines, been instrumental in locating colonial Hunter wine Wine & Identity project has matured well, as sites such as Kirkton, the property of William and explained here. Catherine Kelman. The image below is the grave site of Kelman and Busby family members. Follow project research and join the conversation on Twitter at #VinesWineIdentity. FAMILY HISTORY Academic historians increasingly recognise the role played by family historians in providing intelligence about people and places in Australia. In her recent book Fractured Families: Life on the margins in colonial New South Wales (UNSW Press, 2015), Tanya Evans paid tribute to the tireless searching and documenting of family lives undertaken by descendants of colonial Australians. For Vines, Wine & Identity, work by Pauline Tyrrell is invaluable.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Bird Surveys in the Gloucester Tops
    Gloucester Tops bird surveys The Whistler 13 (2019): 26-34 Spring bird surveys in the Gloucester Tops Alan Stuart1 and Mike Newman2 181 Queens Road, New Lambton, NSW 2305, Australia [email protected] 272 Axiom Way, Acton Park, Tasmania 7021, Australia [email protected] Received 14 March 2019; accepted 11 May 2019; published on-line 15 July 2019 Spring surveys between 2010 and 2017 in the Gloucester Tops in New South Wales recorded 92 bird species. The bird assemblages in three altitude zones were characterised and the Reporting Rates for individual species were compared. Five species (Rufous Scrub-bird Atrichornis rufescens, Red-browed Treecreeper Climacteris erythrops, Crescent Honeyeater Phylidonyris pyrrhopterus, Olive Whistler Pachycephala olivacea and Flame Robin Petroica phoenicea) were more likely to be recorded at high altitude. The Sulphur-crested Cockatoo Cacatua galerita, Brown Cuckoo-Dove Macropygia phasianella and Wonga Pigeon Leucosarcia melanoleuca were less likely to be recorded at high altitude. All these differences were statistically significant. Two species, Paradise Riflebird Lophorina paradiseus and Bell Miner Manorina melanophrys, were more likely to be recorded at mid-altitude than at high altitude, and had no low-altitude records. The differences were statistically significant. Many of the 78 species found at low altitude were infrequently or never recorded at higher altitudes and for 18 species, the differences warrant further investigation. There was only one record of the Regent Bowerbird Sericulus chrysocephalus and evidence is provided that this species may have become uncommon in the area. The populations of Green Catbird Ailuroedus crassirostris, Australian Logrunner Orthonyx temminckii and Pale-yellow Robin Tregellasia capito may also have declined.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Unpublished Correspondence of the Rev. W.B. Clarke D.F
    Journal & Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, Vol. 141, p. 1–31, 2008 ISSN 0035-9173/08/02001–31 $4.00/1 Some Unpublished Correspondence of the Rev. W.B. Clarke d.f. branagan and t.g. vallance Abstract: Four previously unpublished letters, with memoranda of Rev. W.B. Clarke to W.S. Macleay, written between 1842 and 1845 clarify the ideas of both about the mode of formation of coal and the age of the stratigraphical succession in the Sydney Basin. Clarke makes the first mention of his discovery of the Lake Macquarie fossil forest, the first identification of the zeolite stilbite in New South Wales and gives details of his study of the volcanic rocks of the Upper Hunter Valley. Keywords: Clarke, Macleay, coal formation, Sydney Basin, stilbite INTRODUCTION essentially self-contained, although, of course, almost no letter can stand alone, but depends When Dr Thomas G. Vallance died in 1993 a on the correspondents. Each letter has some considerable amount of his historical jottings importance in dealing with aspects of Clarke’s and memorabilia on the history of Australian geological work, as will be noted. science, and particularly geology, was passed The first and longest letter, which is ac- on to me (David Branagan) through his wife, companied by a long series of memoranda and Hilary Vallance. For various reasons, only now a labelled sketch fits between two letters from have I been able to delve, even tentatively, into MacLeay (28 June & 4 July 1842) to Clarke. this treasure house. The present note con- Both these MacLeay letters have been repro- cerns four letters of the Reverend W.B.
    [Show full text]
  • New South Wales and Sydney
    University of Waikato Library: Map Collection Australia: New South Wales and Sydney The Map Collection of the University of Waikato Library contains a comprehensive collection of maps from around the world with detailed coverage of New Zealand and the Pacific. Editions are first unless stated. Some maps designated S are held in storage on Level 1. Please ask a librarian if you would like to use one. General, road and street maps Hema North East New South Wales 7th ed. 2010 1: 375,000 Snowy – Kosciuszko 2nd ed. 2011 1: 200,000 South East New South Wales 4th ed. 2011 1: 385,000 Mid North Coast and New England 3rd ed. 2011 1: 375,000 Sydney and region 2006 various UBD New South Wales state plus Sydney suburban (map 270) 23rd ed. 2005 various Newcastle suburban streets (map 280) 16th ed. 2012 1: 25,000 Blue Mountains suburban streets (map 290) 17th ed. 2012 1: 25,000 Wollongong street map (map 299) 14th ed. 2011 1: 25,000 Cartoscope maps of rural New South Wales Central Coast Region, including town maps of Gosford, Avoca, 12th 2012 Terrigal, etc Coffs Coast to Armidale, including town maps of Coffs Harbour, 11th 2012 Nambucca Heads, Armidale, etc Eurobodalla, including town maps of Batemans Bay, Moruya, Mogo, 13th 2012 etc Great Lakes Region, including town maps of Forster, Tuncurry, 20th 2012 Pacific Palms, etc Manning Valley, including town maps of Taree, Harrington, Old Bar, 11th 2012 etc Newcastle Hunter Region, including town maps of Lake Macquarie, 1st 2012 Hunter Valley, Maitland, etc Port Macquarie/Macleay Valley, including town maps
    [Show full text]
  • The Vertebrate Fauna of Northern Yengo National Park
    The Vertebrate Fauna of Northern Yengo National Park Project funded under the Central Branch Parks and Wildlife Division Biodiversity Survey Priorities Program Information and Assessment Section Metropolitan Branch Environmental Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) June 2005 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project has been undertaken by Helen Hair and Scat Analysis Achurch, Elizabeth Magarey and Daniel Barbara Triggs Connolly from the Metropolitan Branch Information and Assessment, EPRD Bat Call Analysis Section Head, Information and Assessment Narawan Williams Julie Ravallion Special thanks to: Staff of the Hunter Range Area and Central Coordinator, Bioregional Data Group Coast Regional Office for assistance in Daniel Connolly planning and support during the surveys. Private Property owners for allowing us to stay GIS and Database Coordinator on their land and access the park through their Peter Ewin properties. Report Writing and Map Production Daniel Connolly This report should be referenced as follows: Helen Achurch DEC (2005) “The Vertebrate Fauna of Northern Yengo National Park.” Unpublished report Field Surveyors funded by the Central Branch Parks and Narawan Williams Wildlife Division Biodiversity Survey Priorities Martin Schulz Program by NSW Department of Environment Dion Hobcroft and Conservation, Information and Assessment Alex Dudley Section, Metropolitan Branch, Environment Elizabeth Magarey Protection and Regulation Division. Helen Achurch Richard Harris Doug Beckers All photographs are
    [Show full text]
  • The Vertebrate Fauna of Werakata National Park and Werakata State Conservation Area
    The Vertebrate fauna of Werakata National Park and Werakata State Conservation Area THE VERTEBRATE FAUNA OF WERAKATA NATIONAL PARK AND WERAKATA STATE CONSERVATION AREA Information and Assessment Section Metropolitan Branch Environment Protection and Regulation Group Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW) November 2008 For enquiries regarding this report please Published by: contact Martin Schulz or Daniel Connolly of the Department of Environment and Climate Information and Assessment Section, Change Metropolitan Branch, Climate Change and 43 Bridge St, Hurstville NSW 2220 Environment Protection Group, Department of PO Box 1967, Hurstville NSW 1482 Environment and Climate Change, Hurstville. Phone (02) 995 5000 (switchboard) www.environment.nsw.gov.au This report should be referenced as follows: The Department of Environment and Climate DECC (2008) The Vertebrate Fauna of Change is pleased to allow this material to be Werakata National Park and State Conservation reproduced in whole or in part, provided the Area. Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW, Hurstville. meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Map data is supplied by the Department of ISBN 978 1 74122 880 9 Environment and Climate Change. Maps are copyright Department of Environment and DECC 2008/350 Climate Change NSW. They are not guaranteed November 2008 to be free from error or omission. The Department of Environment and Climate Change and its employees disclaim liability for any act done on the information in
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects and Challenges for the Hunter Region a Strategic Economic Study
    Prospects and challenges for the Hunter region A strategic economic study Regional Development Australia Hunter March 2013 Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. © 2013 Deloitte Access Economics Pty Ltd Prospects and challenges for the Hunter region Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Part I: The current and future shape of the Hunter economy .................................................... 3 2 The Hunter economy in 2012 .......................................................................................... 4 2.2 Population and demographics ........................................................................................... 5 2.3 Workforce and employment ............................................................................................. 8 2.4 Industrial composition .................................................................................................... 11 3 Longer term factors and implications ............................................................................ 13 3.1 New patterns in the global economy ............................................................................... 13 3.2 Demographic change ...................................................................................................... 19
    [Show full text]
  • Response to the Draft Hunter Regional Plan from the Wollombi Valley Progress Association, January 2016
    Response to the Draft Hunter Regional Plan from the Wollombi Valley Progress Association, January 2016 We, the Wollombi Valley Progress Association (WVPA), representing the communities of Wollombi and Laguna, welcome the opportunity to respond to the Draft Hunter Regional Plan. The WVPA seeks to protect the rural villages of Wollombi and Laguna and the rural settlement of the entire Wollombi Valley. In view of this, it makes the following points in relation to the Draft Hunter Regional Plan. The Draft Hunter Regional Plan does not mention Wollombi, Laguna or the Wollombi Valley either in text or map. This is a serious omission and means that the Plan fails to recognise the cultural, historic, economic and environmental significance of this area of the Hunter Valley. In Figure 2, the ‘Western Hunter’ subregion does not mark the location of Wollombi and Laguna. In Figure 9, the Wollombi Valley is not identified as a rural resource. In Figures 11 and 12, the two villages and the Wollombi Valley are not recognised for the high environmental values they possess. In Figure 14 the Wollombi Valley is not recognised as an integral part of an important water catchment. We see these serious omissions as a lack of planning for the future. A Hunter Regional Plan, we believe, needs the necessary scope and vision to protect, not only to develop. Wollombi, Laguna and the Wollombi Valley need to be identified with the following unique qualities which taken together, differentiate the area from the wider Western Hunter subregion: 1. Natural Environment Despite its relative proximity to the city and urban developments of Sydney, Central Coast and Newcastle the Wollombi Valley still possesses a remarkable, wide range of native animal and plant diversity.
    [Show full text]