Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, 18, 2011 / Notices 2883

Title II Projects submitted by the public. Avenue, Suite 450, Cheyenne, WY DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (4) Public comment. Persons who wish 82003. International Trade Administration to bring related matters to the attention The purpose of the meeting is to of the Committee file written provide orientation and ethics training [A–570–868] statements with the Committee staff for new members and brief the before or after the meeting. committee on civil rights issues in the Folding Metal Tables and Chairs From Dated: January 10, 2011. State. A briefing will be conducted by the People’s Republic of China: Final Randal D. Charles, a representative of the Community Results of 2007–2008 Deferred Acting Designated Federal Officer. Relations Service, U.S. Department of Antidumping Duty Administrative [FR Doc. 2011–869 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am] Justice, Denver. The committee will Review and Final Results of 2008–2009 Antidumping Duty Administrative BILLING CODE 3410–11–P discuss recent Commission and regional Review activities, and plan future activities that include addressing the state of civil AGENCY: Import Administration, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE rights in Wyoming. International Trade Administration, Forest Service Members of the public are entitled to Department of Commerce. submit written comments; the SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Humboldt Resource Advisory comments must be received in the (‘‘Department’’) published its Committee (RAC) Rocky Mountain Regional Office by preliminary results of the 2007–2008 March 5, 2011. The address is 999–18th deferred and 2008–2009 administrative AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. Street, Suite 1380S, Denver, CO 80202. reviews of the antidumping duty order ACTION: Notice of Meeting. Persons wishing to e-mail their on folding metal tables and chairs comments, or to present their comments (‘‘FMTCs’’) from the People’s Republic of SUMMARY: The Humboldt Resource 1 verbally at the meeting, or who desire China (‘‘PRC’’) on 14, 2010. The Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in periods of review (‘‘POR’’) are 1, Eureka, California. The committee additional information should contact Malee Craft, Regional Director, at (303) 2007, through , 2008, for the meeting is authorized under the Secure deferred administrative review, and 866–1040 or by e-mail to: Rural Schools and Community Self- June 1, 2008, through May 31, 2009, for [email protected]. Determination Act (Pub. L. 110–343) the administrative review. We invited and in compliance with the Federal Hearing-impaired persons who will interested parties to comment on our Advisory Committee Act. attend the meeting and require the preliminary results. Based on our DATES: The meeting will be held services of a sign language interpreter analysis of the comments received, we 1, 2011, from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. should contact the Regional Office at have made changes to our margin ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at least ten (10) working days before the calculations. Therefore, the final results the Six Rivers National Forest Office, scheduled date of the meeting. differ from the preliminary results. The 1330 Bayshore Way, Eureka, CA 95501. Records generated from this meeting final dumping margins for these reviews FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: may be inspected and reproduced at the are listed in the ‘‘Final Results of ’’ Adam Dellinger, Committee Rocky Mountain Regional Office, as Review section below. Coordinator, at (707) 441–3569; e-mail they become available, both before and DATES: Effective Date: January 18, 2011. [email protected]. after the meeting. Persons interested in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The the work of this advisory committee are Astvatsatrian or Erin Kearney, AD/CVD meeting is open to the public. The advised to go to the Commission’s Web Operations, Office 8, Import agenda includes a public comment site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact Administration, International Trade period and a review of all Title II project the Rocky Mountain Regional Office at Administration, U.S. Department of proposals received to date. the above e-mail or street address. Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; Dated: January 10, 2011. The meeting will be conducted Tyrone Kelley, telephone: (202) 482–6412 or (202) 482– pursuant to the provisions of the rules 0167, respectively. Forest Supervisor. and regulations of the Commission and [FR Doc. 2011–874 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am] FACA. Background BILLING CODE 3410–11–P Dated at Washington, DC, January 12, 2011. On July 14, 2010, the Department Peter Minarik, published its preliminary results. See Preliminary Results. On 3, 2010, Acting Chief, Regional Programs Meco Corporation (‘‘Meco’’), the COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Coordination Unit. petitioner in the underlying [FR Doc. 2011–903 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am] Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting investigation, provided new surrogate of the Wyoming Advisory Committee BILLING CODE 6335–02–P value information for the 2008–2009 review based on , including Notice is hereby given, pursuant to financial statements from PT Lion Metal the provisions of the rules and Works Tbk (‘‘Lion’’).2 New-Tec regulations of the U.S. Commission on Integration (Xiamen) Co., Ltd. (‘‘New- Civil Rights (Commission), and the regulations of the Federal Advisory 1 See Folding Metal Tables and Chairs from the Committee Act (FACA), that a meeting People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of of the Wyoming Advisory Committee Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 40788 (July 14, 2010) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). will convene at 10 a.m. and adjourn at 2 We note that in the preliminary results, we have 12 p.m. (MST) on Saturday, February 5, selected India as the surrogate country in both 2011, at Holland Hart LLP, 2515 Warren 2007–2008 and 2008–2009 administrative reviews.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:24 Jan 14, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18JAN1.SGM 18JAN1 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES 2884 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Notices

Tec’’), a respondent in the 2008–2009 Portable counter sets consisting of On , 2003, in response to a review, submitted on , 2010, rectangular tables 36″ high and request by Staples, the Office Superstore publicly available information to ‘‘rebut, matching stools; and, Banquet tables. Inc. (‘‘Staples’’), the Department issued a clarify, or correct’’ the information A banquet table is a rectangular table scope ruling that the chair component of submitted by Meco concerning the with a plastic or laminated wood table Staples’ ‘‘Complete Office-To-Go,’’ a 2008–2009 review. On and top approximately 28″ to 36″ wide by folding chair with a tubular steel frame 20, 2010,3 the Department 48″ to 96″ long and with a set of and a seat and back of plastic, with received case briefs from Meco for the folding legs at each end of the table. measurements of: height: 32.5 inches; 2007–2008 deferred and 2008–2009 One set of legs is composed of two width: 18.5 inches; and depth: 21.5 reviews, respectively. On August 25 and individual legs that are affixed inches, is covered by the scope of the , 2010,4 Feili Group (Fujian) together by one or more cross-braces order because it is identical in all Co., Ltd. and Feili Furniture using welds or fastening hardware. In material respects to the scope Development Limited Quanzhou City contrast, folding metal tables have description in the order, but that the (‘‘Feili’’), a respondent in both reviews, legs that mechanically fold table component, with measurements of: and Cosco Home and Office Products independently of one another, and not Width (table top): 43 inches; depth (‘‘Cosco’’), a U.S. importer of subject as a set. (table top): 27.375 inches; and height: merchandise and interested party in (2) Assembled and unassembled 34.875 inches, has legs that fold as a both reviews, submitted rebuttal briefs folding chairs made primarily or unit and meets the requirements for an for the 2007–2008 and 2008–2009 exclusively from steel or other metal exemption from the scope of the order. reviews, respectively. Finally, on (folding metal chairs). Folding metal On September 7, 2004, the August 25, 2010, New-Tec submitted its chairs include chairs with one or more Department found that table styles 4600 rebuttal brief for the 2008–2009 review. cross-braces, regardless of shape or size, and 4606 produced by Lifetime Plastic We have conducted these affixed to the front and/or rear legs with Products Ltd. are within the scope of the order because these products have all of administrative reviews in accordance rivets, welds or any other type of the components that constitute a folding with section 751 of the Tariff Act of fastener. Folding metal chairs include: 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), and 19 metal table as described in the scope. Those that are made solely of steel or On , 2005, the Department CFR 351.213. other metal; those that have a back pad, issued a scope ruling determining that Scope of Order a seat pad, or both a back pad and a seat ‘‘butterfly’’ chairs are not within the pad; and those that have seats or backs scope of the antidumping duty order The products covered by this order made of plastic or other materials. The consist of assembled and unassembled because they do not meet the physical subject merchandise is commonly, but description of merchandise covered by folding tables and folding chairs made not exclusively, packed singly, in the scope of the order as they do not primarily or exclusively from steel or multiple packs of the same item, or in have cross braces affixed to the front other metal, as described below: five piece sets consisting of four chairs and/or rear legs, and the seat and back (1) Assembled and unassembled and one table. Specifically excluded is one piece of cloth that is not affixed folding tables made primarily or from the scope of the order regarding to the frame with screws, rivets, welds, exclusively from steel or other metal folding metal chairs are the following: or any other type of fastener. (folding metal tables). Folding metal Folding metal chairs with a wooden On July 13, 2005, the Department tables include square, round, back or seat, or both; issued a scope ruling determining that rectangular, and any other shapes with Lawn furniture; folding metal chairs imported by legs affixed with rivets, welds, or any Stools; Korhani of America Inc. are within the other type of fastener, and which are Chairs with arms; and scope of the antidumping duty order made most commonly, but not Child-sized chairs. because the imported chair has a exclusively, with a hardboard top The subject merchandise is currently wooden seat, which is padded with covered with vinyl or fabric. Folding classifiable under subheadings foam and covered with fabric or metal tables have legs that mechanically 9401.71.0010, 9401.71.011, polyvinyl chloride, attached to the fold independently of one another, and 9401.71.0030, 9401.71.0031, tubular steel seat frame with screws, not as a set. The subject merchandise is 9401.79.0045, 9401.79.0046, and has cross-braces affixed to its legs. commonly, but not exclusively, packed 9401.79.0050, 9403.20.0018, On May 1, 2006, the Department singly, in multiple packs of the same 9403.20.0015, 9403.20.0030, issued a scope ruling determining that item, or in five piece sets consisting of 9403.60.8040, 9403.70.8010, ‘‘moon chairs’’ are not included within four chairs and one table. Specifically 9403.70.8020, and 9403.70.8030 of the the scope of the antidumping duty order excluded from the scope of the order Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the because moon chairs have different regarding folding metal tables are the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the physical characteristics, different uses, following: HTSUS subheadings are provided for and are advertised differently than Lawn furniture; convenience and customs purposes, the chairs covered by the scope of the order. Trays commonly referred to as ‘‘TV Department’s written description of the On 4, 2007, the Department trays;’’ merchandise is dispositive. issued a scope ruling determining that Side tables; Based on a request by RPA International E–Z Up Inc.’s (‘‘E–Z Up’’) Child-sized tables; International Pty., Ltd. and RPS, LLC Instant Work Bench is not included (collectively, ‘‘RPA’’), the Department within the scope of the antidumping 3 The Department rejected Meco’s original case ruled on January 13, 2003, that RPA’s duty order because its legs and weight brief submitted on August 20, 2010 for the 2008– poly-fold metal folding chairs are within do not match the description of the 2009 review because it contained untimely new the scope of the order because they are folding metal tables in the scope of the factual information. identical in all material respects to the order. 4 The Department rejected Feili’s and Cosco’s original rebuttal brief submitted on August 25, 2010 merchandise described in the petition, On April 18, 2008, the Department for the 2007–2008 review because it contained the initial investigation, and the issued a scope ruling determining that untimely new factual information. determinations of the Secretary. the VIKA Twofold 2-in-1 Workbench/

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:24 Jan 14, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18JAN1.SGM 18JAN1 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Notices 2885

Scaffold (‘‘Twofold Workbench/ we responded in the Issues and merchandise. Where appropriate, we Scaffold’’) imported by Ignite USA, LLC Decision Memorandum is attached to calculated a per-unit rate for each from the PRC is not included within the this notice as an appendix. The Issues importer (or customer) by dividing the scope of the antidumping duty order and Decision Memorandum is a public total dumping margins for reviewed because its rotating leg mechanism document and is on file in the Central sales to that party by the total sales differs from the folding metal tables Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’) in room 7046 in quantity associated with those subject to the order, and its weight is the main Department building, and is transactions. For duty-assessment rates twice as much as the expected also accessible on the Web at http:// calculated on this basis, we will direct maximum weight for folding metal www.trade.gov/ia. The paper copy and CBP to assess the resulting per-unit rate tables within the scope of the order. electronic version of the memorandum against the entered quantity of the On May 6, 2009, the Department are identical in content. subject merchandise. Where an issued a final determination of importer- (or customer) specific circumvention, determining that Changes Since the Preliminary Results assessment rate is de minimis under 19 imports from the PRC of folding metal Based on our analysis of comments CFR 351.106(c) (i.e., less than 0.50 tables with legs connected by cross– received, we have made changes in the percent), the Department will instruct bars, so that the legs fold in sets, and margin calculations for Feili in both the CBP to assess that importer (or otherwise meeting the description of in– 2007–2008 deferred and 2008–2009 customer’s) entries of subject scope merchandise, are circumventing reviews, and for New-Tec in the 2008– merchandise without regard to the order and are properly considered to 2009 review. We have revised the antidumping duties. The Department be within the class or kind of calculation of normal value to reflect a intends to issue appropriate assessment merchandise subject to the order on change in the wage rate from $1.23 to instructions directly to CBP 15 days FMTCs from the PRC. $1.22 for both reviews.5 after publication of the final results of On May 22, 2009, the Department these reviews. issued a scope ruling determining that Final Results of Review folding metal chairs that have legs that We determine that the following Cash Deposit Requirements are not connected with cross-bars are dumping margins exist for the POR: The following cash deposit within the scope of the antidumping requirements will be effective upon duty order on folding metal tables and Manufacturer/exporter Margin publication of the final results of the chairs from the PRC. (percent) 2008–2009 administrative review for all On October 27, 2009, the Department Feili (6/1/2007–5/31/2008) ...... *0.04 shipments of the subject merchandise issued a scope ruling that Lifetime Feili (6/1/2008–5/31/2009) ...... *0.00 entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, Products, Inc.’s (‘‘Lifetime’’) fold-in-half New-Tec (6/1/2008–5/31/2009) .. *0.00 for consumption on or after the adjustable height tables are not included publication date, as provided by section within the scope of the antidumping * This rate is de minimis. 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Feili and duty order because Lifetime’s tables Assessment New-Tec, the cash deposit rate will be essentially share the physical the company-specific rate established in The Department will determine, and characteristics of banquet tables, which the final results of review (except, if the U.S. Customs and Border Protection are expressly excluded from the scope rate is zero or de minimis, no cash (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping duties of the order and, therefore, are outside deposit will be required); (2) for on all appropriate entries of subject the scope of the order. previously investigated or reviewed PRC On , 2010, the Department merchandise in accordance with the and non-PRC exporters not listed above issued a scope ruling determining that final results of these reviews. For that have separate rates, the cash the bistro set imported by Academy assessment purposes, we calculated deposit rate will continue to be the Sports & Outdoors, consisting of two exporter/importer- (or customer) exporter-specific rate published for the chairs and a table, are outside the scope specific assessment rates for most recent period; (3) for all PRC of the antidumping duty order because merchandise subject to these reviews. exporters of subject merchandise that they constitute lawn furniture, which is Where appropriate, we calculated an ad have not been found to be entitled to a expressly excluded from the scope of valorem rate for each importer (or separate rate, the cash deposit rate will the order. customer) by dividing the total dumping be the PRC-wide rate of 70.71 percent; margins for reviewed sales to that party and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of Analysis of Comments Received by the total entered values associated subject merchandise that have not All issues raised in the post- with those transactions. For duty- received their own rate, the cash deposit preliminary comments by parties in assessment rates calculated on this rate will be the rate applicable to the these reviews are addressed in the basis, we will direct CBP to assess the PRC exporters that supplied that non- memorandum from Gary Taverman, resulting ad valorem rate against the PRC exporter. These deposit Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for entered customs values for the subject requirements, when imposed, shall Antidumping and Countervailing Duty remain in effect until further notice. Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, 5 See Analysis for the Final Results of the 2007– 2008 Deferred Administrative Review of Folding Notification to Interested Parties Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Metal Tables and Chairs from the People’s Republic Administration, ‘‘Issues and Decision of China: Feili Group (Fujian) Co., Ltd. and Feili This notice serves as a final reminder Memorandum for the 2007–2008 Furniture Development Limited Quanzhou City to importers of their responsibility Deferred Administrative Review and the (‘‘Feili’’), Analysis for the Final Results of the 2008– under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 2009 Administrative Review of Folding Metal 2008–2009 Administrative Review of Tables and Chairs from the People’s Republic of certificate regarding the reimbursement Folding Metal Tables and Chairs from China: New-Tec Integration (Xiamen) Co. Ltd . of antidumping duties prior to the People’s Republic of China’’ (January (‘‘New-Tec’’), and Analysis for the Final Results of liquidation of the relevant entries 10, 2010) (‘‘Issues and Decision the 2008–2009 Administrative Review of Folding during the review period. Pursuant to 19 ’’ Metal Tables and Chairs from the People’s Republic Memorandum ), which are hereby of China: Feili Group (Fujian) Co., Ltd. and Feili CFR 351.402(f)(3), failure to comply adopted by this notice. A list of the Furniture Development Limited Quanzhou City with this requirement could result in issues that parties raised and to which (‘‘Feili’’). the Department’s presumption that

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:24 Jan 14, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18JAN1.SGM 18JAN1 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES 2886 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Notices

reimbursement of antidumping duties (‘‘Department’’) published in the Federal Textiles Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Waysun occurred and the subsequent assessment Register the preliminary results of the Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd., Cixi Waysun of doubled antidumping duties. second administrative review of the Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd., and Zhaoqing This notice also serves as a reminder antidumping duty order on certain Tifo New Fiber Co., Ltd. (collectively, to parties subject to administrative polyester staple fiber (‘‘PSF’’) from the the ‘‘Certain Separate Rate Companies’’) protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See filed a case brief regarding what responsibility concerning the Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the antidumping duty rate should be disposition of proprietary information People’s Republic of China: Notice of assigned to them. Also on September 1, disclosed under APO as explained in Preliminary Results and Preliminary 2010, Ningbo Dafa, Cixi Santai, the the administrative protective order Rescission, in Part, of the Antidumping Certain Separate Rate Companies, itself. Timely written notification of the Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR Consolidated Textiles, Inc., Fibertex return/destruction of APO materials or 40777 (July 14, 2010) (‘‘Preliminary Corporation, and Stein Fibers Limited conversion to judicial protective order is Results’’). We gave interested parties an filed separate case briefs addressing the hereby requested. Failure to comply opportunity to comment on the other case issues. with the regulations and the terms of an Preliminary Results. Based upon our On October 26, 2010, the Department APO is a sanctionable violation. analysis of the comments and issued a memorandum regarding the This notice of the final results of this information received, we made changes Department’s proposed industry- administrative review is issued and to the margin calculations for the final specific wage rate methodology for the published in accordance with sections results. We continue to find that sales final results and invited interested 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. have not been made below normal value parties to comment. On November 5, Dated: January 10, 2011. (‘‘NV’’) with respect to the mandatory 2010, Ningbo Dafa and Cixi Santai filed comments on the Department’s wage Paul Piquado, respondents who participated fully and are entitled to a separate rate in this rate methodology. On November 10, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 2010, DAK Americas LLC (‘‘Petitioner’’) Administration. administrative review. DATES: Effective Date: January 18, 2011. filed rebuttal comments. Appendix The Department did not hold a public FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry hearing pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(d), List of Comments and Issues in the Issues Huang or Steven Hampton, AD/CVD as any hearing request made by and Decision Memorandum Operations, Office 9, Import interested parties was withdrawn. Comment 1: Selection of the Primary Administration, International Trade Surrogate Country Administration, U.S. Department of Analysis of Comments Received A. Economic Comparability Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution All issues raised in the case and B. Significant Production of Comparable Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; Merchandise rebuttal briefs by parties to these telephone: (202) 482–4047 and (202) reviews are addressed in the ‘‘Certain C. Best Available Surrogate Value 482–0116 respectively. Information Polyester Staple Fiber from the People’s Comment 2: Surrogate Financial Statements SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Republic of China: Issues and Decision A. General Comments Background Memorandum for the Final Results of B. Receipt of Subsidies 2008/2009 Administrative Review,’’ C. Contemporaneity of Financial On July 14, 2010, the Department which is dated concurrently with and Statements published the Preliminary Results of the adopted by this notice (‘‘Decision D. Selection of Financial Statements Based second administrative review of the Memo’’). A list of the issues which on Sales and Production antidumping duty order on certain PSF parties raised and to which we respond E. Selection of Financial Statements Based from the PRC. On , 2010, Ningbo on Primary Business Activity in the Decision Memo is attached to this Dafa Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd. (‘‘Ningbo notice as an Appendix. The Decision Comment 3: Surrogate Financial Statements ’’ Contained on the Record Dafa ) and Cixi Santai Chemical Fiber Memo is a public document and is on Comment 4: Whether it is Appropriate To Co., Ltd. (‘‘Cixi Santai’’), the mandatory file in the Central Records Unit, main Change the Primary Surrogate Country respondents in this review, submitted Commerce building, Room 7046, and is Between Issuance of the Preliminary and additional information regarding accessible on the Department’s Web site Final Results domestic brokerage and handling. On at http://www.trade.gov/ia. The paper [FR Doc. 2011–925 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am] , 2010, Ningbo Dafa and Cixi copy and electronic version of the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Santai submitted additional surrogate memorandum are identical in content. value (‘‘SV’’) information. As part of the Preliminary Results, we Period of Review DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE instructed interested parties to submit The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is June case briefs on August 13, 2010, 30 days 1, 2008, through May 31, 2009. International Trade Administration after the publication of the Preliminary Scope of the Order [A–570–905] Results. On August 3, 2010, we placed additional export data and wage rate The merchandise covered by the order Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From data on the record of this administrative is synthetic staple fibers, not carded, the People’s Republic of China: Final review and invited interested parties to combed or otherwise processed for Results and Partial Rescission of comment in their case briefs with the spinning, of polyesters measuring 3.3 Second Antidumping Duty deadline extended to September 1, decitex (3 denier, inclusive) or more in Administrative Review 2010. On September 1, 2010, Cixi diameter. This merchandise is cut to Sansheng Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd., lengths varying from one inch (25 mm) AGENCY: Import Administration, Hangzhou Best Chemical Fibre Co., Ltd. to five inches (127 mm). The subject International Trade Administration, (‘‘Hangzhou Best’’), Hangzhou merchandise may be coated, usually Department of Commerce. Huachuang Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Sanxin with a silicon or other finish, or not SUMMARY: On July 14, 2010, the Paper Co., Ltd., Nantong Luolai coated. PSF is generally used as stuffing Department of Commerce Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd., NanYang in sleeping bags, mattresses, ski jackets,

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:24 Jan 14, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18JAN1.SGM 18JAN1 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES