Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2016; 4(2): 361-364

E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Distribution and diversity of (: JEZS 2016; 4(2): 361-364 © 2016 JEZS Formicidae) around Gautala Autramghat Received: 25-01-2016 Accepted: 26-02-2016 Sanctuary, Aurangabad Maharashtra,

BV Sonune Department of Zoology BV Sonune, RJ Chavan Moreshwar Arts, Science and Commerce College Bhokardan Abstract Tq. Bhokardan Dist. Jalna M.S. The study was carried out to investigate the diversity and distribution of ants in agriculture, grassland, India. forest and human habitats located around Gautala Autramghat Sanctuary Dist. Aurangabad during

RJ Chavan February 2010 to January 2012. The ants were randomly collected from the study area, by all out search Department of Zoology Dr. method. A total 17 of ants belonging to thirteen genera and six subfamilies such as Formicinae, Babasaheb Ambedkar , Ponerinae, Dolichoderinae, Aenictinae and Pseudomyrmicinae were reported from four Marathwada University, different habitats of present study area. The subfamily Myrmicinae was found to be more diverse with 6 Aurangabad-431004 species, and then followed by Formicinae with 4 species, Pseudomyrmicinae with 3 species, Ponerinae with 6 species and Dolichoderinae & Aenictinae were found least diverse with only one species each. Members of Formicinae, Myrmicinae and Dolichoderinae were reported from all habitats but members of subfamily Ponerinae, Aenictinae and Pseudomyrmicinae were only reported from grassland and forest habitats. A Genus is most diverse comprising three species then followed by Monomorium and Camponotus comprising two species each from the present study area were reported. A genus Tetraponera is most diverse with three species and is followed by Monomorium and Camponotus each with two species. The Shannon Weiner diversity index of forest and grassland habitat was found highest

as compared to human and agricultural habitats. The genus Crematogaster was found to be most

abundant.

Keywords: Formicidae, Ants diversity and distribution, Gautala Autramghat sanctuary, Aurangabad.

Introduction Ants are one of the ideal model organisms for measuring and monitoring biodiversity for many

reasons. It is abundant and dominant in ecological systems as a predator and symbiotic for plants and other organisms. These are relatively easy to collect in a standardized way,

reasonably diverse at the site, identifiable and so on (e.g. Wilson 1976b, Holldobler & Wilson [30, 17, 1] 1990, and Agosti et al. 2000) . Since most species are stationary and have a perennial nest with a restricted foraging range, these are also useful as indicators of

environmental conditions (Chung & Maryati 1996, Peck et al. 1998, Wang et al. 2000; Hashimoto et al. 2001, Andersen et al. 2002, Longino et al. 2002) [13, 23, 29, 16, 4, 21]. Globally, there are about 12,571 extant ant species. As per the recent classification, all ants are grouped [10] into 21 subfamilies (Bolton 2003) . All the ant species fall into the single family Formicidae. This family is included in the super family Vespidae of the order Hymenoptera, which is placed in the class Insecta. The Myrmicinae is the largest subfamily of the Formicidae, with 138 genera, followed by Formicinae that have 39 genera and Ponerinae which have 25 genera. Ants in India, occupy a variety of habitats such as leaf litter, trees, soil

and dead logs, while tramp species prefer human-modified habitats. Myrmicinae forms the bulk of Indian ant diversity (45%) with genera Pheidole and Crematogaster having the most species. The subfamily, Formicinae is the second largest ant group (25% of species), with genera Camponotus and Polyrhachis constituting the majority of the diversity. The subfamily Ponerinae contributes about 14% of species of which genera Leptogenys the most diverse [15] Correspondence Gunawardene et al., (2007) . In India, ant ecology and diversity was studied from some B V Sonune selected localities only. Gunawardene et al. (2007) published work on ants of the Western Department of Zoology Ghats – biodiversity hotspot. Kumar et al. (1997) [19]. Reported the ant fauna from Moreshwar Arts, Science and some areas of Bangalore City. Recently a list of 591 species of ants in India was released by Commerce College Bhokardan Bharti (2007) [7]. Tq. Bhokardan Dist. Jalna M.S. India. The objective of this study was to find out ant diversity and distribution among the four different habitats such as agriculture, grassland, forest, and human habitats around Gautala ~ 361 ~ Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

Autramghat Sanctuary. Till research on ant diversity has not were listed and each species was counted to calculate and been done in this area. This study will generate some valuable compared the composition, richness, and species diversity information about distribution and richness of ant species indices, among the four different habitat types. around Gautala Autramghat Sanctuary. Results Materials and Methods The study reveals that there are 17 species of ants belonging The ant samples were collected from various localities and 13 genera and six subfamilies. The species encountered in the around Gautala Autramghat Sanctuary in Aurangabad District study area include Crematogaster subnuda, Cataulacus latus, of Maharashtra India. Three ecological habitats, agriculture, Monomorium indicum, Monomorium scabriceps, grassland forest and human habitat were chosen for sampling. brunnea, and bicolor belonging to subfamily We employed all out search method for the collection of ants Myrmicinae. Subfamily Formicinae was represented by form February 2010 to January 2012. Ants were hand species like Camponotus compressus, Oecophylla smaragdina, collected using a brush and forceps during day time from 8 am Paratrechina longicornis, Leptogenys diminuta and to 4 pm twice every month and preserved in 70 % alcohol at Pachycondyla sulcata, was representing subfamily Ponerinae. the Department of Zoology, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Subfamily Pseudomyrmicinae was represented by species Marathwada University Aurangabad. Identification of ant Tetraponera allaborans, Tetraponera nigra, and Tetraponera species made with the help of stereozoom trinocular rufonigra. Whereas subfamily Aenictinae was presented by microscope, on the basis of taxonomic keys given by (Bolton, species Aenictus doryloides and subfamily Dolichoderinae by 1994) [9] (Holldobler, and Wilson, 1990 Mathew and R. N. species Tapinoma melanocephalum Shannon wiener diversity Tiwari, 2000 Sheela S.2008) [17, 22, 25] etc. With careful notes of indices 2.21 Agriculture site, 2.77 at grassland site, 2.76 at their locality, habitat and relative visual abundance, ant species forest and 2.14 at human habitat.

Table 1: Subfamily, genus and species wise list of ants collected in and around Gautala Autramghat Sanctuary

Subfamily Genus Species Aenictinae Aenictus Aenictus doryloides (Wilson, 1964) Myrmicinae Crematogaster Crematogaster subnuda (Mayr, 1879) Cataulacus Cataulacus latus (Forel, 1891) Monomorium Monomorium indicum (Forel, 1902) Monomorium Monomorium scabriceps (Mayr, 1879) Myrmicaria Myrmicaria brunnea (Saunders, 1842) Meranoplus Meranoplus bicolor (Guerin-Meneville, 1844) Formicinae Camponotus Camponotus compressus (Fabricius, 1787) Camponotus Camponotus angusticollis (Jerdon, 1851) Oecophylla Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius, 1775) Paratrechina Paratrechina longicornis (Latreille, 1802) Ponerinae Leptogenys Leptogenys diminuta (Smith, F, 1857) Pachycondyla Pachycondyla sulcata (Mayr, 1867) Pseudomyrmicinae Tetraponera Tetraponera allaborans (Walker, 1859) Tetraponera Tetraponera nigra (Jerdon, 1851) Tetraponera Tetraponera rufonigra (Jerdon, 1851) Dolichoderinae Tapinoma Tapinoma melanocephalum (Fabricius, 1793)

Table 2: Distribution of ants in four different habitats in and around Table: 3 Diversity Indices of ants along four different vegetation sites Gautala Autramghat Sanctuary, Aurangabad around Gautala Autramghat Sanctuary

Subfamily/Taxa A G F H Diversity Indices A G F H Aenictinae SWI 2.21 2.77 2.78 2.14 Aenictus doryloides (Wilson, 1964) _ + + _ Richness 1.50 2.61 2.39 1.41 Myrmicinae Evenness 0.88 0.94 0.87 0.82 Crematogaster subnuda (Mayr, 1879) + + + + A: Agriculture G: Grassland F: Forest H: Human habitat Cataulacus latus (Forel, 1891) _ + + _ Monomorium indicum (Forel, 1902) + + + + In India first effort on study of ants was made by Bingham Monomorium scabriceps (Mayr, 1879) + + + + [8] Myrmicaria brunnea (Saunders, 1842) + + + + C.T. (1903) . In the form of the Fauna of British India Meranoplus bicolor (Guerin-Meneville, 1844) + + + _ including Ceylon and Burma. In India there are about 652 Formicinae species under 87genera and 12 subfamilies, Bharti Himender, Camponotus compressus (Fabricius, 1787) + + + + (2011) [6]. In India the ant diversity was studied by many Camponotus angusticollis (Jerdon, 1851) + + + + workers such as Gadagkar et al., (1993) [14] Sunil Kumar et al., Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius, 1775) + + + + (1997) [26]. Chavhan et al., (2010) [11]. Ali (1991) [2]. And Paratrechina longicornis (Latreille, 1802) + + + + (1992). [3] In the present study, we reported 17 species of ants Ponerinae belonging to 13 genera representing six subfamilies namely Leptogenys diminuta (Smith, F, 1857) _ + + _ Aenictinae Myrmicinae, Formicinae, Ponerinae, Pachycondyla sulcata (Mayr, 1867) _ + + _ Pseudomyrmicinae Dolichoderinae and Pseudomyrmicinae. This result indicates Tetraponera allaborans (Walker, 1859) _ + + _ that the diversity of ants in the Sanctuary is comparable to Tetraponera nigra (Jerdon, 1851) _ + + _ species richness in various habitats in India Gadagkar (1993), Tetraponera rufonigra (Jerdon, 1851) _ + + _ [14]. Dolly Kumar 2008 [18]. Chavan and Pawar (2010) [12]. etc. Dolichoderinae Noor et al., (2005) [24]. Also reported 9 subfamilies in Sangai Tapinoma melanocephalum (Fabricius, 1793) + + + + forest from , Bharti et al., (2009) [5]. Observed 8 A: Agriculture G: Grassland F: Forest H: Human habitat ~ 362 ~ Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

subfamilies in Punjab Shivalik respectively. Chavan and biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington, Pawar (2010) [12]. Have reported 34 species 20 genera and 5 U.S.A, 2000. subfamilies of Formicidae around Amravati city of 2. Ali TM. Ant fauna of Karnataka IUSSI Newsletter 1991; Maharashtra, India. Whereas ant fauna of Karnataka studied 5:1-8. by Bingham (1903) [8]. Where he has reported 443 species of 3. Ali TM. Ant fauna of Karnataka IUSSI Newsletter 1992; ants from India which comes under 5 subfamilies and 79 6:1-7. genera in his Fauna British of India. Ali (1991and 1992) [2, 3]. 4. Andersen AN, Hoffman BD, Muller WJ, Griffiths A. Reported 125 species from Karnataka which comes under 7 Using ants as bioindicators in land management: subfamilies and 30 genera. Gadagkar et al., (1993) [14]. have simplifying assessment of ant community responses. collected ants from 12 different localities in Kannada district Journal of Applied Ecology. 2002; 39:8-17. of Karnataka and reported 140 species under 32 genera 5. Bharti Himender, Sharma Yash Paul. Seasonal Patterns of belonging 6 subfamilies, Sunil Kumar et al., (1997) [26]. Have ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Punjab shivalik studied ant species richness at selected localities of Bangalore Halteres, 2009, 1. and reported 75 species belonging to 33 genera 6 subfamilies. 6. Bharti Himender. List of Indian ants (Hymenoptera: Rastogi et al., (1997) [24]. He reported 70 species from Indian Formicidae) Halteres, 2011, 3. institute of science campus which comprising 32 genera and 6 7. Bharti H, Alpert GD. Ants of India. Downloaded, 2007. subfamilies, later on Varghese (2003) [28]. Have noted 85 from ww.antdiversity.com/ 26 December 2007. species under 38 genera belonging to 8 subfamilies. 8. Bingham CT. The Fauna of British India, including Subfamily Myrmicinae was most diverse comprising 5 genera Ceylon and Burma. Hymenoptera, Ants and Cuckoo-wasp and 6 species as compared to other subfamilies reported here. (Taylor and Francis: London). 1903, 2. Subfamily Myrmicinae is widely distributed in all geographic 9. Bolton B. Identification guide to the ant genera of the regions (Chavhan and Pawar, 2011) [12]. This correlate with the world. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1994, present study, because, we also collected the highest number 222. of ant species from subfamily Myrmicinae. Total 10 species of 10. Bolton B. Synopsis and classification of Formicidae. ant were collected from agriculture fields, 17 from grassland Memoirs of the American, Entomological Institute, 2003, and forest area each and only 9 species from human habitats. 71:1-370, 7:251-409. (Table 2). The subfamily Formicinae comprising three genera 11. Chavhan Arvind, Santosh Pawar S, Baig MM. Ants & species each, subfamily Ponerinae was represented with two species richness around Amravati city Maharashtra, India genera and two species while subfamily Pseudomyrmicinae Nature Preceding, 2010. hdl: 10101/npre.2010.5491.1. was reported with three species. Subfamilies Dolichoderinae 12. Chavhan Arvind, Pawar SS. Distribution and diversity of and Aenictinae are represented by single genus and species. ants species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in and around The genus Camponotus and Crematogaster were documented Amravati city of Maharashtra, India World Journal of from all the habitats of study area. Pharaoh ants are frequently zoology. 2011; 6(4):395-400. observed on the Acacia & Neem tree trunks and feeding on 13. Chung AYC. Maryati M. A comparative study of the ant dead . The species diversity indices among four fauna in a primary and secondary forest in Sabah, different habitats were somewhat different likely highest in Malaysia. In Edwards, D. S., W.E.Booth & S.C. Choy, forest (2.78), followed by grassland (2.77) and lowest in (eds.). Tropical Rainforest Research-Current Issues. agriculture (2.21) and human habitat (2.14). Number of ant Kluwer Academic Publisher. Dodrecht, Nederlands, 1996, species reported from forest and grassland habitat was same 357-366. because it may have same microhabitat structure. Total 14. Gadagkar Raghvendra, Padmini Nair, Chandrasekhara K, number of ant species collected from agriculture and human Bhat DM. Ant species richness and diversity in some habitat was less as compared to forest and grassland habitat selected localities in Western Ghats, India. Hexapoda, because of habitat complexity. Forest cover and number of 1993; 5:79-94. trees was more in forest and grassland habitats as agriculture 15. Gunawardene NR, Daniels AE, Dulip G, Gunatilleke CV, and human habitat. More number of tress and canopy cover Karunakaran PV, Nayak KG et al. A brief overview of the provide foraging places as compared to others. Sunil Kumar et Western Ghats-Sri Lanka biodiversity hotspot. Current Sci al., (1997) [26]. And Bharti, (2007) [7]. Reported the ant species 2007; 93(11):1567-1572. richness generally increases with increase in vegetation. It is 16. Hashimoto Y, Yamane S, Mohamed M. How to design an evident that, the various human activities in this region destroy inventory method for ground-level ants in tropical forest. the ant habitats and alter the ecology. The genus Nature and Human Activities 2001; 6:25-30. Crematogaster and Camponotus are dominant in the forest site 17. Holldobler B, Wilson EO. The Ants. Harvard University and human habitats. Press. Cambridge, U. S.A, 1990. 18. Kumar Dolly, Mishra Archana. Ant community variation Acknowledgement in urban and agricultural ecosystems in Vadodara district Authors are thankful to Dr. Himender Bharti (Professor, (Gujarat State) Western India Asian Myrmecology 2008; Department of zoology, Panjabi University, Patiyala) for his 2:85-93. valuable suggestion regarding identification ants and 19. Kumar Sunil M KT, Nair P, Varghese T, Gadagkar R. Ant continuous encouragement. Authors are also thankful to head species richness at selected localities of Bangalore and professor department of Zoology, Dr. Babasaheb Environment 1997; 3:3-5. Ambedkar Marathwada University Aurangabad, for providing 20. Longino JT, Coddington J, Colwell RK. The ant fauna of necessary laboratory facilities during the research work. tropical rainforest: estimating species richness three different ways. Ecology 2002; 83:689-702. References 21. Mathew R, Tiwari RN. Insects: Hymenoptera: Formicidae 1. Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE. Schultz TR. Ants. State Fauna Series 4: Fauna of Meghalaya 2000; 7:251- Standard method for measuring and monitoring 409.

~ 363 ~ Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

22. Noor Farikhah Haneda, Ahmad Said Sajap, Mohamed Zakaria Hussin. A study of two ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) sampling method in tropical rainforest. Journal of Applied Sciences. 2005; 5(10):1732-1734. 23. Peck SLB, McQuaid, Campbell CL. Using Ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as biological indicator of agro ecosystem condition. Environmental Entomology Press. Cambridge, U.S.A 1998; 27:1102-1110. 24. Rastogi N, Nair P, Kolatkar M, William H, Gadagkar R. Ant fauna of the Indian Institute of Science -survey and some preliminary observations J Indian Inst. Sci. 1997; 77:133-140. 25. Sheela S. Handbook on Hymenoptera: Formicidae. Z.S.I., 2008. 26. Sunil Kumar M, Shrihari KT, Nair P, Varghese T, Gadagkar R. Ant Species Richness at selected localities of Bangalore. Insect Environment 1997; 3(1):3-5. 27. Tiwari RN, Kundu BG, Roy S, Choudhury Ghosh SN. Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae. State Fauna Series 3, Zoological Survey of India, Fauna of West Bengal 1998; 8:211-294. 28. Varghese T. Ants of the Indian Institute of Science Campus. Technical report No. 98 Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 2003. 29. Wang C, Strazanac J, Butler L. Abundance, diversity, and activity of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) inoak- dominated mixed Appalachian forest treated with microbial pesticides. Environmental Entomology 2000; 29:579-586. 30. Wilson EO. Which are the most prevalent ant genera? Stud. Entomology. Worlds: 250 1976b; 19:187-200.

~ 364 ~