DOCSLIB.ORG

The Unsung Heroes of the Irish Peace Process Ted Smyth

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Unsung Heroes of the Irish Peace Process Ted Smyth REC•NSIDERATI•NS Ted Smyth took part in the Irish peace process as an Irish diplomat in the United States, Britain, and the secretariat of the New Ireland Forum. The Unsung Heroes of the Irish Peace Process Ted Smyth Why did the Irish peace process eventually been viewed as traitors to their Catholic succeed in stopping the sectarian killing af- tribe, but today they are celebrated for their ter centuries of violence in Ireland and when courage and integrity. other sectarian conflicts still rage around the The road to peace in Ireland was led by world? Might there be lessons the Irish many, many individuals who made contri- could teach the world about reconciling bit- butions large and small. There were politi- ter enemies? The political successes in cians who were truly heroic, but it should Northern Ireland owe much to that oft- never be forgotten that the ordinary people scorned ingredient, patient, determined, and of Northern Ireland steadily found their principled diplomacy, which spanned suc- own way toward reconciliation, defying his- cessive administrations in London, Dublin, tory and the climate of fear. Maurice Hayes, and Washington. The result is a structure a columnist for the Irish Independent and a surely durable enough to survive the IRA’s veteran peacemaker puts it well: “Through- disturbing recent violations: an apparently out the troubles, in the darkest days, there long-planned $50 million raid on the have been outstanding examples of charity Northern Bank in Belfast in December at- and courage, of heroic forgiveness, often, tributed to IRA militants and the leader- and most notably, from those who had suf- ship’s unabashedly outlaw offer to shoot fered most. One thinks of Gordon Wilson, their own members responsible for the bru- who held his daughter’s hand while she died tal murder of a Belfast man, Robert Mc- in the rubble of a bombing in Enniskillen, Cartney, after a pub quarrel in January of dedicating the rest of his life to the search this year. The peace may be tested once for reconciliation.”1 again during the perennially volatile Some of the finest people from two con- “marching season” this summer when tinents worked on the Irish peace process for Ulster hardliners vent sectarian passions. 30 years, and their influence was apparent Still, there is agreement that a political in three decisive elements that made the dif- peace now prevails, backed by a popular ference between success and failure. The consensus sturdy enough to frustrate a veto first element was strong political leadership by a violent minority, or a continued crimi- in pursuit of a unifying vision consistently nal conspiracy by Sinn Fein/IRA. The univer- supporting nonviolence. Such leadership is sal public revulsion in Ireland north and rare, but just as South Africa was fortunate south toward the IRA’s handling of the Mc- to have Nelson Mandela to lead it peacefully Cartney murder and the huge swell of sup- to freedom, so Ireland was fortunate to have port for McCartney’s sisters in their public John Hume, an eloquent, charismatic Irish- calls for the arrest and punishment by due man with a Ghandi-like faith in nonvio- process of his killers give ample evidence of lence. As long ago as 1972, the soft-spoken the success of the peace process. Twenty founder and former leader of the Social De- years ago, the McCartney sisters would have mocratic and Labor Party (SDLP), an essential The Unsung Heroes of the Irish Peace Process 79 voice of moderation and nonviolence for 30 colony, and just before the outbreak of the years, stated that peace could only be based First World War the British government re- on “an agreed Ireland,” with shared govern- luctantly concluded that it could not govern ment between the two nationalisms, the the country and moved to grant a form of Irish Nationalists who wanted Irish unity, independence. The Loyalists settlers in the and the British Loyalists, who wanted to re- northeast, fearful of losing privileged status, main part of the United Kingdom. smuggled weapons from Germany preparing The second key element was political to fight British troops if necessary to retain imagination and receptiveness to new ideas the British link. By 1920, the British gov- by key politicians and officials in Ireland ernment gave in to these threats and parti- and Britain who established a series of insti- tioned Ireland, in effect gerrymandering a tutional frameworks to build confidence majority for the Protestant Loyalists. Half a between the two sides and to provide securi- million Irish Nationalists were trapped ty. Among these institutions were the Sun- within the new border. ningdale Agreement, the New Ireland Fo- Successive British governments legiti- rum, the Anglo-Irish Agreement, and the mized this stand-off by guaranteeing that Good Friday Agreement. Probably the most Northern Ireland should remain part of the important breakthrough was the Anglo- UK so long as the Loyalist majority wished Irish Agreement of 1985, which guaranteed it. Writing in Foreign Affairs in 1979, John the equal legitimacy of the conflicting loy- Hume concluded that this “produced the alties by giving the Irish government a sig- basis for a half century of injustice, discrim- nificant role in Northern Ireland for the ination and repressive law, a situation in first time in history. A leading commenta- which the minority community have been tor on Northern Ireland, David McKittrick the persistent losers and victims”3 of the London Independent, says: “In retro- The state that was founded on violence spect, that agreement was a turning point went on to erupt in regular cycles of vio- in the peace process and provided the foun- lence during the twentieth century, the dation for its ultimate success.”2 The story worst being the recent “Troubles” that left of how that agreement was reached and suc- 3,600 dead and thousands more dreadfully cessfully implemented is a combination of maimed. The beginning of this latest con- shrewd calculation and courage, which lured flict can be traced to the Loyalist murders in people from the extremes, promising re- 1966 of three innocent civilians (one a 77- spect, protection, peace, and a prospect of year-old Protestant, mistakenly assumed to prosperity. be Catholic). At the time, many Catholics The third element was the important and Nationalists were inspired by the Amer- role of the United States in providing job- ican civil rights movement to march for ba- creating peace incentives and in correcting sic rights such as “one man, one vote” and the imbalance of power between Britain and fair allocation of public housing. The Ireland. America, with its 40 million Irish marches, with the familiar refrain of “we Americans, decisively helped the peace shall overcome,” came under increasing at- process through at least three major crises tack by both Loyalists and the local police, that threatened to derail it. with 77 injured in a Derry march in 1969. The sectarian conflict in Northern Ire- Ian Paisley emerged as the leader of the Loy- land dates back to the seventeenth century alists, ranting against Catholics and whip- when Protestant settlers from Scotland ping up fear among Protestants. In the sum- seized land from the native Catholic Irish as mer of 1969, 150 Catholic homes in Belfast part of the British attempt to colonize Ire- were burned by rioters as the police stood land. But Ireland was always a troublesome by. In the face of such provocation, the Pro- 80 WORLD POLICY JOURNAL • SPRING 2005 visional IRA came into being, recruiting vol- Asked, for example, during a meeting in unteers as “the defenders” of the National- Derry why he objected to “wee boys” throw- ists. It was not long, however, before this ing stones, he gave a reply which will res- defender role became, like that of the Loyal- onate with anyone who has seen the geno- ist terror groups, one of sectarian aggression cide dramatized in the movie Hotel Rwanda: and criminal conspiracy. “Because you don’t know what effect it will Stung by international outrage at the have—whether it will be a broken window, attacks on Irish Nationalists, the British twenty broken windows, or a thousand government deployed soldiers on the streets dead. When you can’t control a weapon, you of Belfast and Derry both to protect the don’t use it.”4 Later that year, Hume was Nationalists and restore stability to a situa- elected to the local Northern Ireland parlia- tion that was getting out of hand. The ment and together with five other members troops were initially welcomed by the local formed the SDLP, which would become population with flowers and trays of tea. the majority nonviolent voice of the Irish But the IRA deliberately provoked the Nationalists. troops, and their heavy-handed reaction was In an attempt to replace violence with seen as a broad attack on the Nationalists. politics, the British and Irish governments In tactics eerily similar to those employed in joined the SDLP and the moderate Loyalist the Sunni triangle in Iraq, local communi- party, the Ulster Unionist Party, in a novel ties rallied around the “insurgents.” The initiative in 1973. The result was the Sun- British hope of acceptance as a neutral ningdale Agreement, which provided for a peacekeeping force was finally dashed by in- power-sharing government between Nation- ternment without trial of hundreds of Na- alists and Loyalists in Belfast, and a consul- tionalists and the “Bloody Sunday” killings tative role for the Dublin government. of 13 civilians by British paratroopers in While the prescriptive arrangements were 1972. Many ordinary Nationalists and Loy- visionary, the extremists of Northern Ireland alists became convinced that only some sort were not yet ready for compromise.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identity, Authority and Myth-Making: Politically-Motivated Prisoners and the Use of Music During the Northern Irish Conflict, 1962 - 2000
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queen Mary Research Online Identity, authority and myth-making: Politically-motivated prisoners and the use of music during the Northern Irish conflict, 1962 - 2000 Claire Alexandra Green Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 I, Claire Alexandra Green, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged below and my contribution indicated. Previously published material is also acknowledged below. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other Intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the College has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of the thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. Signature: Date: 29/04/19 Details of collaboration and publications: ‘It’s All Over: Romantic Relationships, Endurance and Loyalty in the Songs of Northern Irish Politically-Motivated Prisoners’, Estudios Irlandeses, 14, 70-82. 2 Abstract. In this study I examine the use of music by and in relation to politically-motivated prisoners in Northern Ireland, from the mid-1960s until 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Book PDF Download
    9780719075636_1_pre.qxd 17/2/09 2:11 PM Page i Irish literature since 1990 9780719075636_1_pre.qxd 17/2/09 2:11 PM Page ii 9780719075636_1_pre.qxd 17/2/09 2:11 PM Page iii Irish literature since 1990 Diverse voices edited by Scott Brewster and Michael Parker Manchester University Press Manchester and New York distributed in the United States exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan 9780719075636_1_pre.qxd 17/2/09 2:11 PM Page iv Copyright © Manchester University Press 2009 While copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in Manchester University Press, copyright in individual chapters belongs to their respective authors. This electronic version has been made freely available under a Creative Commons (CC-BY- NC-ND) licence, which permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction provided the author(s) and Manchester University Press are fully cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. Details of the licence can be viewed at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Published by Manchester University Press Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9NR, UK and Room 400, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data applied for ISBN 978 07190 7563 6 hardback First published 2009 18171615141312111009 10987654321 Typeset by Graphicraft Limited, Hong Kong 9780719075636_1_pre.qxd 17/2/09 2:11 PM Page v Contents Acknowledgements page vii Notes
    [Show full text]
  • How New Is New Loyalism?
    HOW NEW IS NEW LOYALISM? CATHERINE MCGLYNN EUROPEAN STUDIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD SALFORD, UK Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, February 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Page 1 Chapter One Hypothesis and Methodology Page 6 Chapter Two Literature Review: Unionism, Loyalism, Page 18 New Loyalism Chapter Three A Civic Loyalism? Page 50 Chapter Four The Roots of New Loyalism 1966-1982 Page 110 Chapter Five New Loyalism and the Peace Process Page 168 Chapter Six New Loyalism and the Progressive Page 205 Unionist Party Chapter Seven Conclusion: How New is New Loyalism? Page 279 Bibliography Page 294 ABBREVIATONS CLMC Combined Loyalist Military Command DENI Department of Education for Northern Ireland DUP Democratic Unionist Party IOO Independent Orange Order IRA Irish Republican Army LAW Loyalist Association of Workers LVF Loyalist Volunteer Force NICRA Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association NIHE Northern Ireland Housing Executive NILP Northern Ireland Labour Party PUP Progressive Unionist Party RHC Red Hand Commandos RHD Red Hand Defenders SDLP Social Democratic and Labour Party UDA Ulster Defence Association UDP Ulster Democratic Party UDLP Ulster Democratic and Loyalist Party UFF Ulster Freedom Fighters UUP Ulster Unionist Party UUUC United Ulster Unionist Council UWC Ulster Workers' Council UVF Ulster Volunteer Force VPP Volunteer Political Party ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my PhD supervisor, Jonathan Tonge for all his support during my time at Salford University. I am also grateful to all the staff at the Northern Irish Political collection at the Linen Hall Library in Belfast for their help and advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland Peace Initiative
    Northern Ireland Peace Initiative JOURNEY TO BELFAST AND LONDON Report and Policy Recommendations by William J. Flynn and George D. Schwab February 1999 Contents • Acknowledgment • Foreword • Policy Recommendations • From Hate to Hope • Conclusion ACKNOWLEDGMENT At the invitation of the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, a National Committee on American Foreign Policy mission consisting of William J. Flynn, chairman, and George D. Schwab, president, spent a week (November 2-7, 1998) in Belfast discussing the peace process in Northern Ireland and in London where we also discussed U.S. and British global security interests with leading statesmen, politicians, diplomats, and academics. The meetings took place at Stormont Estate, 10 Downing Street, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the House of Commons, think tanks, and the American embassy in London, among other sites. Before embarking, Dr. Schwab was briefed at the State Department by James I. Gadsden, deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Canadian affairs; James M. Lyons, special adviser to the president and the secretary of state for economic initiatives in Ireland; Katharine E. Koch, special assistant, office of the special adviser to the president and the secretary of state for economic initiatives in Ireland; and Patricia Nelson-Douvelis, Ireland desk officer. Although this report and the policy recommendations it contains focus on Northern Ireland, the material gathered on U.S. and British national security interests will be incorporated in relevant NCAFP publications, including those forthcoming on NATO and the Middle East. The sensitivity of some of the issues discussed led a number of people to request that they not be quoted by name or identified in other ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulster Loyalist Perspectives on the IRA and Irish Republicanism James
    University of Huddersfield Repository McAuley, James W. and Ferguson, Neil ‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Ulster Loyalist Perspectives on the IRA and Irish Republicanism Original Citation McAuley, James W. and Ferguson, Neil (2016) ‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Ulster Loyalist Perspectives on the IRA and Irish Republicanism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 28 (3). pp. 561-575. ISSN 0954- 6553 This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/27270/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ Us & Them Running Heading: US & THEM ‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Ulster Loyalist Perspectives on the IRA and Irish Republicanism James W McAuley (University of Huddersfield) Neil Ferguson (Liverpool Hope University) Correspondence concerning this article should be sent to James W. McAuley, Institute for Research in Citizenship and Applied Human Sciences, School of Health and Human Sciences, University of Huddersfield, England, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Party Politics in Ireland In
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Huddersfield Repository REDEFINING LOYALISM —A POLITICAL PERSPECTIVE David Ervine, MLA —AN ACADEMIC PERSPECTIVE James W McAuley IBIS working paper no. 4 REDEFINING LOYALISM —A POLITICAL PERSPECTIVE David Ervine, MLA —AN ACADEMIC PERSPECTIVE James W McAuley No. 4 in the lecture series “Redefining the union and the nation: new perspectives on political progress in Ireland” organised in association with the Conference of University Rectors in Ireland Working Papers in British-Irish Studies No. 4, 2001 Institute for British-Irish Studies University College Dublin IBIS working papers No. 4, 2001 © the authors, 2001 ISSN 1649-0304 ABSTRACTS REDEFINING LOYALISM— A POLITICAL PERSPECTIVE Although loyalism in its modern sense has been around since the 1920s, it ac- quired its present shape only at the beginning of the 1970s. Then it was reborn in paramilitary form, and was used by other, more privileged, unionists to serve their own interests. Yet the sectarianism within which loyalism developed disguised the fact that less privileged members of the two communities had much in common. Separation bred hatred, and led to an unfounded sense of advantage on the part of many Protestants who in reality enjoyed few material benefits. The pursuit of ac- commodation between the two communities can best be advanced by attempts to understand each other and to identify important shared interests, and the peace process can best be consolidated by steady, orchestrated movement on the two sides, and by ignoring the protests of those who reject compromise. REDEFINING LOYALISM— AN ACADEMIC PERSPECTIVE In recent years a division has emerged within unionism between two sharply con- trasting perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Gusty Spence Papers 1955-1998 MS.2013.008
    Gusty Spence Papers 1955-1998 MS.2013.008 http://hdl.handle.net/2345/3669 Archives and Manuscripts Department John J. Burns Library Boston College 140 Commonwealth Avenue Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467 617-552-3282 [email protected] http://www.bc.edu/burns Table of Contents Summary Information ................................................................................................................................. 3 Administrative Information .........................................................................................................................4 Biographical note...........................................................................................................................................5 Scope and Contents note............................................................................................................................... 6 Arrangement note...........................................................................................................................................6 Collection Inventory...................................................................................................................................... 7 Series I: Correspondence........................................................................................................................7 Series II: Official documents..................................................................................................................7 Series III: Personal documents...............................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Voices from the Grave Ed Moloney Was Born in England. a Former Northern Ireland Editor of the Irish Times and Sunday Tribune, He
    Voices prelims:Layout 1 3/12/09 11:52 Page i Voices from the Grave Ed Moloney was born in England. A former Northern Ireland editor of the Irish Times and Sunday Tribune, he was named Irish Journalist of the Year in 1999. Apart from A Secret History of the IRA, he has written a biography of Ian Paisley. He now lives and works in New York. Professor Thomas E. Hachey and Dr Robert K. O’Neill are the General Editors of the Boston College Center for Irish Programs IRA/UVF project, of which Voices from the Grave is the inaugural publication. Voices prelims:Layout 1 3/12/09 11:52 Page ii by the same author the secret history of the ira paisley: from demagogue to democrat? Voices prelims:Layout 1 3/12/09 11:52 Page iii ed moloney VOICES FROM THE GRAVE Two Men’s War in Ireland The publishers would like to acknowledge that any interview material used in Voices from the Grave has been provided by kind permission from the Boston College Center for Irish Programs IRA/UVF project that is archived at the Burns Library on the Chestnut Hill campus of Boston College. Voices prelims:Layout 1 3/12/09 11:52 Page iv First published in 2010 by Faber and Faber Limited Bloomsbury House 74–77 Great Russell Street London wc1b 3da Typeset by Faber and Faber Limited Printed in England by CPI Mackays, Chatham All rights reserved © Ed Moloney, 2010 Interview material © Trustees of Boston College, 2010 The right of Ed Moloney to be identified as author of this work has been asserted in accordance with Section 77 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 Use of interview material by kind permission of The Boston College Irish Center’s Oral History Archive.
    [Show full text]
  • Loyalist Supergrass Trials: an Opportunity for Open Source Intelligence?
    Loyalist supergrass trials: an opportunity for open source intelligence? Monaghan, R. Author post-print (accepted) deposited by Coventry University’s Repository Original citation & hyperlink: Monaghan, R 2019, 'Loyalist supergrass trials: an opportunity for open source intelligence?', Intelligence and National Security, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1014-1026. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2019.1646518 DOI 10.1080/02684527.2019.1646518 ISSN 0268-4527 ESSN 1743-9019 Publisher: Taylor and Francis This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Intelligence and National Security on 01/08/2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/ 10.1080/02684527.2019.1646518 Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. This document is the author’s post-print version, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer-review process. Some differences between the published version and this version may remain and you are advised to consult the published version if you wish to cite from it. Presenter: Dr Rachel Monaghan Affiliation: Ulster University, School of Applied Social & Policy Sciences Postal address: Ulster University, School of Applied Social & Policy Sciences, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, BT37 0QB E mail address: [email protected] Telephone: 028 90366343 Loyalist Supergrass Trials in Northern Ireland: An Opportunity for Open Source Intelligence? In the 1980s some thirty members of paramilitary groups in Northern Ireland both republican and loyalist, agreed to provide evidence against their former colleagues in return for a reduced sentence or immunity from prosecution, a new identity and life.
    [Show full text]
  • Reports to the General Assembly 1999
    PRES LY B B SED Y S V T M N IR E E E E R S D N I A S R S N A A L C H A U R E R N C E H G • • IN D IR E L A N GENERAL ASSEMBLY of The Presbyterian Church in Ireland 1999 ORDER OF BUSINESS Notes: Business commences at 9.30 a.m. each morning. Luncheon adjournment at 1.00 p.m. each day. The figures printed in brackets are page references to the Annual Reports. References to the Minutes of Assembly are given in full. NOTES ii MONDAY, JUNE 7 Within Church House 7.00 p.m.— Divine Service Constitution of Assembly Memorial Roll Election of Moderator TUESDAY, JUNE 8 Within May Street Church 9.30 a.m.— Sacrament of the Lord’s Supper (Intermission 15 minutes) Within Church House 11.00 a.m.— 1. BUSINESS BOARD: Report and Resolutions (85-94). Arrangements Committee. 2. Memorial of Railway Street Kirk Session (94). 3. Reports of Synods and Presbyteries (76-84). (11.30) 4. Reception of Corresponding Members and Delegates. Church of Scotland: Right Rev. John B. Cairns (Moderator), Prof. Herbert A. Kerrigan Q.C., Rev. Scott J. Brown, R.N., Mrs. Ann McCarter. United Reformed Church: Mrs. Wilma Frew (Moderator), Rev. Peter Brain. Presbyterian Church of Wales: Rev. W. I. Cynwil Williams (Moderator). Church of Ireland: Rt. Rev. J. E. Moore, Dr. P. H. C. Trimble. Times in brackets may be anticipated but should not be passed. iii NOTES iv The Methodist Church in Ireland: Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL REPORT (Hansard)
    OFFICIAL REPORT (Hansard) Vol u m e 2 (15 February 1999 to 15 July 1999) BELFAST: THE STATIONERY OFFICE LTD £70.00 © Copyright The New Northern Ireland Assembly. Produced and published in Northern Ireland on behalf of the Northern Ireland Assembly by the The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Northern Ireland Assembly publications. ISBN 0 339 80001 1 ASSEMBLY MEMBERS (A = Alliance Party; NIUP = Northern Ireland Unionist Party; NIWC = Northern Ireland Women’s Coalition; PUP = Progressive Unionist Party; SDLP = Social Democratic and Labour Party; SF = Sinn Fein; DUP = Ulster Democratic Unionist Party; UKUP = United Kingdom Unionist Party; UUP = Ulster Unionist Party; UUAP = United Unionist Assembly Party) Adams, Gerry (SF) (West Belfast) Kennedy, Danny (UUP) (Newry and Armagh) Adamson, Ian (UUP) (East Belfast) Leslie, James (UUP) (North Antrim) Agnew, Fraser (UUAP) (North Belfast) Lewsley, Patricia (SDLP) (Lagan Valley) Alderdice of Knock, The Lord (Initial Presiding Officer) Maginness, Alban (SDLP) (North Belfast) Armitage, Pauline (UUP) (East Londonderry) Mallon, Seamus (SDLP) (Newry and Armagh) Armstrong, Billy (UUP) (Mid Ulster) Maskey, Alex (SF) (West Belfast) Attwood, Alex (SDLP) (West Belfast) McCarthy, Kieran (A) (Strangford) Beggs, Roy (UUP) (East Antrim) McCartney, Robert (UKUP) (North Down) Bell, Billy (UUP) (Lagan Valley) McClarty, David (UUP) (East Londonderry) Bell, Eileen (A) (North Down) McCrea, Rev William (DUP) (Mid Ulster) Benson, Tom (UUP) (Strangford) McClelland, Donovan (SDLP) (South
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Transformation and the Loyalist Paramilitaries of Northern Ireland
    “Taking Responsibility”: Conflict Transformation and the Loyalist Paramilitaries of Northern Ireland Britt Sloan April 2011 Senior Honors Thesis International Relations, Tufts University Advisors: Eileen Babbitt, The Fletcher School Kelly Greenhill, Tufts University ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank the leadership of the Ulster Defense Association, the Ulster Volunteer Force, the Ulster Political Research Group, and the Progressive Unionist Party for their generous time and contributions to this work. Their willingness to welcome me into their communities afforded me opportunities to acquire insights that I would otherwise have never been able to gain, and their honesty in explaining a troubled history and a hopeful future was truly enlightening. In addition, thank you to those who offered advice and analysis throughout my travels in Belfast and upon my return home. I would also like to acknowledge my advisors, Professor Eileen Babbitt for her gracious acceptance of an undergraduate advisee and for her unstinting encouragement and Professor Kelly Greenhill for her astute critiques and for making time in her busy schedule. I would like to give a special thank you to Allan Leonard of the Northern Ireland Foundation for his incredible mentorship, Quintin Oliver of Stratagem for sharing with me his endless networks, and Tony Novosel for his constant enthusiasm and guidance. Although they had no obligation to support my research, they have always made themselves available to discuss, debate, and advise. Most importantly, this research would not have been possible without the financial support of Sherman Teichman and the Tufts Institute for Global Leadership and of the Tufts Undergraduate Research Fund. Finally, thank you to all those who are “taking responsibility” for conflict transformation and working to build peaceful societies.
    [Show full text]