The Circle Squared, Beyond Refutation MAA Committee on Participation of Women Sponsors Panel On
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Association for Women in Mathematics: How and Why It Was
Mathematical Communities t’s 2011 and the Association for Women in Mathematics The Association (AWM) is celebrating 40 years of supporting and II promoting female students, teachers, and researchers. It’s a joyous occasion filled with good food, warm for Women conversation, and great mathematics—four plenary lectures and eighteen special sessions. There’s even a song for the conference, titled ‘‘((3 + 1) 9 3 + 1) 9 3 + 1 Anniversary in Mathematics: How of the AWM’’ and sung (robustly!) to the tune of ‘‘This Land is Your Land’’ [ICERM 2011]. The spirit of community and and Why It Was the beautiful mathematics on display during ‘‘40 Years and Counting: AWM’s Celebration of Women in Mathematics’’ are truly a triumph for the organization and for women in Founded, and Why mathematics. It’s Still Needed in the 21st Century SARAH J. GREENWALD,ANNE M. LEGGETT, AND JILL E. THOMLEY This column is a forum for discussion of mathematical communities throughout the world, and through all time. Our definition of ‘‘mathematical community’’ is Participants from the Special Session in Number Theory at the broadest: ‘‘schools’’ of mathematics, circles of AWM’s 40th Anniversary Celebration. Back row: Cristina Ballantine, Melanie Matchett Wood, Jackie Anderson, Alina correspondence, mathematical societies, student Bucur, Ekin Ozman, Adriana Salerno, Laura Hall-Seelig, Li-Mei organizations, extra-curricular educational activities Lim, Michelle Manes, Kristin Lauter; Middle row: Brooke Feigon, Jessica Libertini-Mikhaylov, Jen Balakrishnan, Renate (math camps, math museums, math clubs), and more. Scheidler; Front row: Lola Thompson, Hatice Sahinoglu, Bianca Viray, Alice Silverberg, Nadia Heninger. (Photo Cour- What we say about the communities is just as tesy of Kiran Kedlaya.) unrestricted. -
August 1995 Council Minutes
AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY COUNCIL MINUTES Burlington, Vermont 05 August 1995 Abstract The Council of the American Mathematical Society met at 1:00 p.m. on Satur- day, 05 August 1995, in the Emerald Grand Ballroom in the Sheraton Burlington, Burlington, Vermont. These are the minutes for the meeting. Members present were Georgia Benkart, Joan Birman, Robert Daverman (vot- ing Associate Secretary), David Epstein, Robert Fossum, John Franks, Ron Gra- ham, Steven Krantz, Andy Magid (Associate Secretary), Cathleen Morawetz, Frank Morgan, Franklin Peterson, Marc Rieffel, Cora Sadosky, Norberto Salinas, Peter Shalen, Lesley Sibner (Associate Secretary), B. A. Taylor, Jean Taylor, and Sylvia Wiegand. Staff and others invited to attend were Don Babbitt (Publisher), Annalisa Cran- nell (Committee on the Profession Representative), Chandler Davis (Canadian Mathematical Society Representative), John Ewing (Executive Director), Tim Gog- gins (Development Officer), Carolyn Gordon (Editorial Boards Committee Repre- sentative), Jim Lewis (Committee on Science Policy Chair), James Maxwell (AED), Don McClure (Trustee), Susan Montgomery (Trustee), Everett Pitcher (Former Secretary), Sam Rankin (AED), and Kelly Young (Assistant to the Secretary). President Morawetz presided. 1 2 CONTENTS Contents IAGENDA 4 0 CALL TO ORDER AND INTRODUCTIONS. 4 1MINUTES 4 1.1March95Council...................................... 4 1.2 05/95 Meeting of the Executive Committee and Board of Trustees. 4 2 CONSENT AGENDA. 4 2.1Resolutions......................................... 4 2.1.1 Exxon Foundation. ......................... 4 2.2CommitteeAdministration................................ 5 2.2.1 Dischargewiththanks............................... 5 2.2.2 CommitteeCharges................................ 5 3 REPORTS OF BOARDS AND STANDING COMMITTEES. 5 3.1 EDITORIAL BOARDS COMMITTEE (EBC). .................. 5 3.1.1 TransactionsandMemoirsEditorialCommittee................. 5 3.1.2 Journal of the AMS . -
Manifolds at and Beyond the Limit of Metrisability 1 Introduction
ISSN 1464-8997 125 Geometry & Topology Monographs Volume 2: Proceedings of the Kirbyfest Pages 125–133 Manifolds at and beyond the limit of metrisability David Gauld Abstract In this paper we give a brief introduction to criteria for metris- ability of a manifold and to some aspects of non-metrisable manifolds. Bias towards work currently being done by the author and his colleagues at the University of Auckland will be very evident. Wishing Robion Kirby a happy sixtieth with many more to follow. AMS Classification 57N05, 57N15; 54E35 Keywords Metrisability, non-metrisable manifold 1 Introduction By a manifold we mean a connected, Hausdorff topological space in which each point has a neighbourhood homeomorphic to some euclidean space Rn .Thus we exclude boundaries. Although the manifolds considered here tend, in a sense, to be large, it is straightforward to show that any finite set of points in a manifold lies in an open subset homeomorphic to Rn ; in particular each finite set lies in an arc. Set Theory plays a major role in the study of large manifolds; indeed, it is often the case that the answer to a particular problem depends on the Set Theory involved. On the other hand Algebraic Topology seems to be of less use, at least so far, with [16, Section 5] and [5] being among the few examples. Perhaps it is not surprising that Set Theory is of major use while Algebraic Topology is of minor use given that the former is of greater significance when the size of the sets involved grows, while the latter is most effective when we are dealing with compact sets. -
AMS November 2006 ECBT Minutes
AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES NOVEMBER 17-18, 2006 PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND MINUTES A joint meeting of the Executive Committee of the Council (EC) and the Board of Trustees (BT) was held Friday and Saturday, November 17-18, 2006, at the AMS Headquarters in Providence, Rhode Island. The following members of the EC were present: James G. Arthur, Sylvain E. Cappell, Walter Craig, Robert J. Daverman, James G. Glimm, and Paul J. Sally, Jr. Robert M. Guralnick was unable to attend. The following members of the BT were present: James G. Arthur, John B. Conway, John M. Franks, Eric M. Friedlander, Donald E. McClure, Jean E. Taylor, and Carol S. Wood. Linda Keen was unable to attend. Also present were the following AMS staff members: Gary G. Brownell (Deputy Executive Director), Kevin F. Clancey (Executive Editor, Mathematical Reviews), John H. Ewing (Executive Director and Publisher), Ellen H. Heiser (Assistant to the Executive Director [and recording secretary]), Elizabeth A. Huber (Deputy Publisher), Ellen J. Maycock (Associate Executive Director, Meetings and Professional Services), and Samuel M. Rankin (Associate Executive Director, Government Relations and Programs). Constance W. Pass (Chief Financial Officer) was present on Saturday. President James Arthur presided over the EC and ECBT portions of the meeting (items beginning with 0, 1, or 2). Board Chair Jean Taylor presided over the BT portion of the meeting (items beginning with 3). Items occur in numerical order, which is not necessarily the order in which they were discussed at the meeting. 0 CALL TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCEMENTS 0.1 Opening of the Meeting and Introductions. -
Summer 2004 Vol
A PUBLICATION FOR AUGSBURG COLLEGE ALUMNI & FRIENDS Spring/Summer 2004 Vol. 66, No. 3-4 LLettersETTERS Editor’s note n 1924, at a time of many changes continue to make an Augsburg current Augsburg student, who has faced Ibrought by the expansion of education available to many students, the greatest of challenges in recovery Augsburg’s academic program and the the endowment must grow. from a devastating brain injury. With the introduction of women students, Through Augsburg Now, news and compassion and commitment of Augsburgian editor Caleb Quanbeck stories about the campaign, Access to Augsburg staff and faculty working wrote, “Now that we are increasing in Excellence: The Campaign for Augsburg with his family, he was able to begin a numbers and have developed more College, will be featured in a newsletter college career. comprehensive curricula will we be called Vision. In this issue, a special Stephanie Quick, an Augsburg willing to assume the responsibilities edition of Vision presents an overview of graduate and seminary student, is also which come with the greater Augsburg?” the campaign as well as stories about the featured. Her efforts to collect donated (See Auggie Thoughts, p. 44.) generosity of donors who have already prom dresses—that most likely would Over the years there is little doubt made significant contributions and about never be worn again—from parishioners that the response has always been a students who benefit from it. at her home church in the Twin Cities resounding “yes.” This year also marks a change in and through her sister here at Augsburg, As readers 80 years from now look leadership on Augsburg’s Board of brightened the lives of Native Alaskan back to this day and what is being Regents. -
In This Issue Contributed Papers S Minicourses
THE NEWSLETIER OF THE MATHEMATICAL ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA April 1998 Volume 18, Number 4 , In This Issue contributed papers S Minicourses 6 Social Events SpecialSes."'l ~/Of/S 7 Call for Student Papers Invited Addresses 8 Housing Form 9 Program at a Glance "If/vesting for Retlrem 10 Registration Information The Mathematical Association of America 1529 Eighteenth St., NW Washington, DC 20036 FOCUS FOCUS is published by the Mathematical Association of America in January, February, March, April, May/June, August/September, October, November, and December. MATHEMATICS Editor: Harry Waldman, MAA; 1 [email protected] ORIGINAL Managing Editor: Carol Baxter, MAA Advertising Coordinator: Joseph AWARENESS~ Watson, MAA; [email protected] President: Gerald L.Alexanderson, Santa Clara University First Vice-President: Anita Solow, DePauw University WEEK8 Second Vice-President: Ed Dubinsky, Georgia State University WAVELET 100:1 compression April 26-May 2 Secretary: Martha Siegel, Towson Preserves all bUI fine structure University Treasurer: Gerald J. Porter, University of Pennsylvania Executive Director: Marcia P. Sward Associate Executive Director and Ma t!lematics Directorof Publicationsand Electronic Services: Donald J. Albers Letters to the editor should be addressed &'Imaging to Harry Waldman, MAA, 1529 WAVELETPACKET BASIS ]0:1 compression Eighteenth Street, NW, Washington, DC Preserves [me structure of hri~lles 20036. Subscription and membership questions should be directed to the MAA Customer Service Center, 800-331-1622; e-mail: [email protected]; (301) 617-7800 (outside U.S. and Canada); fax: (301) 206 9789. FOCUS is a benefit of MAA membership. The subscription price to individual members is $6.00, which is included in the annual dues. -
How a Mathematician Started Making Movies 185
statements pioneers and pathbreakers How a Mathematician Started Making Movies M i ch e l e e M M e R The author’s father, Luciano Emmer, was an Italian filmmaker who made essentially two—possibly three—reasons. The first: In 1976 I feature movies and documentaries on art from the 1930s through was at the University of Trento in northern Italy. I was work- 2008, one year before his death. Although the author’s interest in films ing in an area called the calculus of variations, in particular, inspired him to write many books and articles on cinema, he knew he ABSTRACT would be a mathematician from a young age. After graduating in 1970 minimal surfaces and capillarity problems [4]. I had gradu- and fortuitously working on minimal surfaces—soap bubbles—he had ated from the University of Rome in 1970 and started my the idea of making a film. It was the start of a film series on art and career at the University of Ferrara, where I was very lucky mathematics, produced by his father and Italian state television. This to start working with Mario Miranda, the favorite student of article tells of the author’s professional life as a mathematician and a Ennio De Giorgi. At that time, I also met Enrico Giusti and filmmaker. Enrico Bombieri. It was the period of the investigations of partial differential equations, the calculus of variations and My father, Luciano Emmer, was a famous Italian filmmaker. the perimeter theory—which Renato Caccioppoli first intro- He made not only movies but also many documentaries on duced in the 1950s and De Giorgi and Miranda then devel- art, for example, a documentary about Picasso in 1954 [1] oped [5–7]—at the Italian school Scuola Normale Superiore and one about Leonardo da Vinci [2] that won a Silver Lion of Pisa. -
Holomorphic Disks and Genus Bounds Peter Ozsvath´ Zoltan´ Szabo´
ISSN 1364-0380 (on line) 1465-3060 (printed) 311 Geometry & Topology G T GG T T T Volume 8 (2004) 311–334 G T G T G T G T Published: 14 February 2004 T G T G T G T G T G G G G T T Holomorphic disks and genus bounds Peter Ozsvath´ Zoltan´ Szabo´ Department of Mathematics, Columbia University New York, NY 10025, USA and Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA and Department of Mathematics, Princeton University Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA Email: [email protected] and [email protected] Abstract We prove that, like the Seiberg–Witten monopole homology, the Heegaard Floer homology for a three-manifold determines its Thurston norm. As a consequence, we show that knot Floer homology detects the genus of a knot. This leads to new proofs of certain results previously obtained using Seiberg–Witten monopole Floer homology (in collaboration with Kronheimer and Mrowka). It also leads to a purely Morse-theoretic interpretation of the genus of a knot. The method of proof shows that the canonical element of Heegaard Floer homology associated to a weakly symplectically fillable contact structure is non-trivial. In particular, for certain three-manifolds, Heegaard Floer homology gives obstructions to the existence of taut foliations. AMS Classification numbers Primary: 57R58, 53D40 Secondary: 57M27, 57N10 Keywords: Thurston norm, Dehn surgery, Seifert genus, Floer homology, contact structures Proposed:RobionKirby Received:3December2003 Seconded: JohnMorgan,RonaldStern Revised: 12February2004 c Geometry & Topology Publications 312 Peter Ozsv´ath and Zolt´an Szab´o 1 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to verify that the Heegaard Floer homology of [27] determines the Thurston semi-norm of its underlying three-manifold. -
Arxiv:Math/0610131V1 [Math.GT] 3 Oct 2006 Omlter.Let Theory
A CONTROLLED-TOPOLOGY PROOF OF THE PRODUCT STRUCTURE THEOREM Frank Quinn September 2006 Abstract. The controlled end and h-cobrodism theorems (Ends of maps I, 1979) are used to give quick proofs of the Top/PL and PL/DIFF product structure theorems. 1. Introduction The “Hauptvermutung” expressed the hope that a topological manifold might have a unique PL structure, and perhaps analogously a PL manifold might have a unique differentiable structure. This is not true so the real theory breaks into two pieces: a way to distinguish structures; and the proof that this almost always gives the full picture. Milnor’s microbundles [M] are used to distinguish structures. This is a relatively formal theory. Let M ⊂ N denote two of the manifold classes DIFF ⊂ PL ⊂ TOP. An N manifold N has a stable normal (or equivalently, tangent) N microbundle, and an M structure on N provides a refinement to an M microbundle. The theory is set up so that this automatically gives a bijective correspondence between stable refinements of the bundle and stable structures, i.e. M structures on the N manifold N × Rk, for large k. Microbundles can be described using classifying spaces. This shows, for instance, that if N is a topological manifold then M × Rk has a smooth structure (for large k) exactly when the stable tangent (or normal) microbundle N → BTOP has a (ho- motopy) lift to BDIFF, and stable equivalence classes of such structures correspond to homotopy classes of lifts. The homotopy type of the classifying spaces can be completely described modulo the usual mystery of stable homotopy of spheres. -
Fighting for Tenure the Jenny Harrison Case Opens Pandora's
Calendar of AMS Meetings and Conferences This calendar lists all meetings and conferences approved prior to the date this issue insofar as is possible. Instructions for submission of abstracts can be found in the went to press. The summer and annual meetings are joint meetings with the Mathe January 1993 issue of the Notices on page 46. Abstracts of papers to be presented at matical Association of America. the meeting must be received at the headquarters of the Society in Providence, Rhode Abstracts of papers presented at a meeting of the Society are published in the Island, on or before the deadline given below for the meeting. Note that the deadline for journal Abstracts of papers presented to the American Mathematical Society in the abstracts for consideration for presentation at special sessions is usually three weeks issue corresponding to that of the Notices which contains the program of the meeting, earlier than that specified below. Meetings Abstract Program Meeting# Date Place Deadline Issue 890 t March 18-19, 1994 Lexington, Kentucky Expired March 891 t March 25-26, 1994 Manhattan, Kansas Expired March 892 t April8-10, 1994 Brooklyn, New York Expired April 893 t June 16-18, 1994 Eugene, Oregon April4 May-June 894 • August 15-17, 1994 (96th Summer Meeting) Minneapolis, Minnesota May 17 July-August 895 • October 28-29, 1994 Stillwater, Oklahoma August 3 October 896 • November 11-13, 1994 Richmond, Virginia August 3 October 897 • January 4-7, 1995 (101st Annual Meeting) San Francisco, California October 1 December March 4-5, 1995 -
2021 September-October Newsletter
Newsletter VOLUME 51, NO. 5 • SEPTEMBER–OCTOBER 2021 PRESIDENT’S REPORT This is a fun report to write, where I can share news of AWM’s recent award recognitions. Sometimes hearing about the accomplishments of others can make The purpose of the Association for Women in Mathematics is us feel like we are not good enough. I hope that we can instead feel inspired by the work these people have produced and energized to continue the good work we • to encourage women and girls to ourselves are doing. study and to have active careers in the mathematical sciences, and We’ve honored exemplary Student Chapters. Virginia Tech received the • to promote equal opportunity and award for Scientific Achievement for offering three different research-focused the equal treatment of women and programs during a pandemic year. UC San Diego received the award for Professional girls in the mathematical sciences. Development for offering multiple events related to recruitment and success in the mathematical sciences. Kutztown University received the award for Com- munity Engagement for a series of events making math accessible to a broad community. Finally, Rutgers University received the Fundraising award for their creative fundraising ideas. Congratulations to all your members! AWM is grateful for your work to support our mission. The AWM Research Awards honor excellence in specific research areas. Yaiza Canzani was selected for the AWM-Sadosky Research Prize in Analysis for her work in spectral geometry. Jennifer Balakrishnan was selected for the AWM- Microsoft Research Prize in Algebra and Number Theory for her work in computa- tional number theory. -
A Great Deal Has Been Published Since the First Appearance of Space Structures
A great deal has been published since the first appearance of Space Structures. William L. Hall, Jack C. Gray and the author have main tained a reading shelf and a file of reprints, which have been the major source of this appended bibliography on Design Science. As this bibliography transcends the boundaries of many disciplines, it has not been an easy task to keep abreast of developments. It has been the author's experience that a well-informed grapevine can be more effective than a computer search and therefore wishes to express his thanks to the many friends who sent in reprints and refer ences. However, the author wishes to apologize for errors of com mission and of omission which appear to be virtually inevitable. BOOKS: Abbott, A.: Flatland, Dover, New York (1952, 1983). Albairn, K., J. Miall Smith, S. Steele and D. Walker: The Language of Pattern, Thames & Hudson, London (1974). Abelson, H. and A. diSessa: Turtle Geometry, MIT Press, Cam bridge (1981). Adams, James L.: Conceptual Blockbusting, W. H. Freeman & Co., New York (1974). Alexander, Christopher: Notes on the Synthesis of Form, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge (1964). Alexander, Christopher et al.: A Pattern Language, Oxford Univ. Press, New York (1977). Applewhite, E. J.: Cosmic Fishing, Macmillan, New York (1977). 163 164 BIBLIOGRAPHY Applewhite, E. 1., ed.: Synergetics Dictionary, the Mind of Buck minster Fuller, Garland, New York (1986). Arnheim, Rudolf: Visual Thinking, Univ. of California Press, Berkeley (1969). Arnstein, Bennett: Origami Polyhedra, Exposition Press, New York (1968). Bacon, G. E.: The Architecture of Solids, Taylor and Francis, London (1981).