Narrative Empathy for “The Other” in American Literature, 1845-1945

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Narrative Empathy for “The Other” in American Literature, 1845-1945 NARRATIVE EMPATHY FOR “THE OTHER” IN AMERICAN LITERATURE, 1845-1945 Patrick Emmet Horn A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English and Comparative Literature. Chapel Hill 2013 Approved by: Rebecka Rutledge Fisher Minrose Gwin Jennifer Ho Fred C. Hobson Timothy Marr ABSTRACT PATRICK E. HORN: Narrative Empathy for “the Other” in American Literature, 1845-1945 (Under the direction of Rebecka Rutledge Fisher) “Empathy” is a relatively new word in the English language, dating back to the early twentieth century as a translation of the German term Einfühlung (“in-feeling” or “feeling into” a work of art or another being). Yet the interpersonal relations that “empathy” encompasses are as old as human history, and literary depictions of empathy are as old as human narratives. Narrative empathy is a central trope of American literature because in a nation of immigrants and enslaved subjects who became fully recognized citizens—not to mention the native peoples who had always lived here—imaginative identification with unfamiliar “Others” became a constant necessity. Narrative empathy encompasses both diegetic empathy, or empathic relations between narrators and characters (or between multiple characters), and readerly empathy, or empathic relations between readers and narrators or characters within the text. Readerly empathy results from a complicated interplay between formal qualities, personal factors, and authorial information. Considering literary narratives as rhetorical situations reveals that narratives are conceived and received as interactions between authors, texts, and readers. Narrative judgments about how characters think, feel, and behave within the context of their particular storyworlds become more influential than any categorical identifications that we forge—either with or against characters—based on personal similarities or differences. Whereas “the Other” is perceived through a lens of radical and/or categorical alterity, empathy works against the logic of Otherness as an imaginative identification with an/other. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am deeply indebted to the brilliant and generous members of my dissertation committee: Fred Hobson, Minrose Gwin, Timothy Marr, Jennifer Ho, and Rebecka Rutledge Fisher. Fred showed me how one scholar’s mentorship can produce a veritable field of academic offspring. Minrose exemplified the intellectual rigor of a subject matter expert who expects young scholars to engage carefully with the ideas of those who paved the way for their research. Tim encouraged me to think more expansively about how academic arguments can engage meaningfully with the real world beyond university walls, while also warning against asym- metrical engagements with the Other. Jennifer broadened the scope of my project, moving it beyond a binary black-and-white approach to American literature and critical race theory. And Rebecka worked tirelessly to help me grow into a more sophisticated critical reader—of American literature, of literary theory and criticism, and of my own work. To these talented and inspiring scholars I will always remain grateful. Much of my research has supported the notion that empathy is learned first and foremost in the context of one’s immediate family, and my own large family (which now includes a host of in-laws) has offered many opportunities for challenging and expanding my views on the subject. I was fortunate to have two loving and encouraging parents, who always supported my academic efforts and often charged me to “be the best!” Thank you, Mom and Dad, from the bottom of my heart. And to the rest of the Horns (including Rapisardos, Browns, Browders, and future family members), my love to you all. iii I was lucky to attend graduate school with a cohort of witty and wonderful colleagues, who are too many to name here. Special gratitude is due to my “Collective”—Jess Martell, Zack Vernon, and Sarah Marsh. We have studied together, traveled together, taught and tutored together, conducted archival research together, delivered conference panels together—with the Collective assembled, all things are possible! Through The Southern Literary Journal, I was also blessed to encounter an inspiring graduate mentor in Kristina Bobo, as well as a wise friend and coeditor in Jameela Dallis. If graduate school can be experienced with such wonderful fellow- travelers, it is bound to be a pleasure. My project has been supported and enriched by many other generous scholars, including Bill Ferris, Mary Floyd-Wilson, Jane Thrailkill, Bill Andrews, Tyler Curtain, Eliza Richards, Inger Brodie, Trudier Harris, Megan Matchinske, Fritz Breithaupt, Melanie Green, Jordan Carpenter, Ed Fisher, Mike Millner, Natalia Smith, Ralph Savarese, Vicki Russell, and Alex Ruch. I am very grateful to you all. And this work would never have been possible without my brilliant, beautiful, and patient wife, Sarah Rapisardo Horn, who trusted and tolerated me throughout the daunting and probably ill-advised process of pursuing doctorates together while raising a family. We survived! To Kaitlyn, Sophia, and Maris Mae, I thank you for not coloring in my books, and for reminding me that “work” and “life” should not be synonymous. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………….1 Chapter I. A CRITICAL (PRE)HISTORY OF NARRATIVE EMPATHY.…………………….39 Narratology, Reader-Response Theory, and Cognitive Studies ……………...40 Representation, Identification, and “Pity” in Ancient Greek Philosophy……..53 Updating the Ancients: Eighteenth-Century Theories of Emotion……………57 Darwinian Evolution and the Expression of Emotions………………………..62 William James, Emotions, and the Question of Truth………………………...72 Twentieth-Century Pragmatism: Dewey on Emotional Experience…………..78 The Prehistory, in Hindsight…………………………………………………..82 Contemporary Science(s) of Empathy……………………………………...…85 II. INVITATIONS TO EMPATHY AND SYMPATHY IN ABOLITIONIST NARRATIVES……...………………………………………………………………..91 Stowe’s Stereotypes and the Possibility of Empathy…………………………92 Models of Manly Empathy in The Heroic Slave…………………………….104 Insidious Alterity and Unreliable Narration in Benito Cereno……………....116 Jacobs’s Direct Appeal for Empathy……………………..………………….122 III. EYEING THE OTHER: TRANSGRESSIVE LOVE AND AUTHORIAL EMPATHY IN TURN-OF-THE-CENTURY FICTION……………………………133 Racialism, Empathy, and Romance in Ramona ……………………………..135 The Look of Love: Eyes, Empathy, and Oxytocin …………………………..145 v Embattled Empathy in The Squatter and the Don …………………………...149 Ethnic Others and Transgressive Desire in My Ántonia……………………...161 Authorial Empathy and the Narrative Other………………………………….176 IV. NARRATIVE EMPATHY IN PROGRESSIVE ERA AUTOBIOGRAPHIES: THE LIVES OF OTHERS ………………………………..194 “A Man Among Men”: Implicit Appeals for Empathy in Douglass’s Autobiographies………………………………………………………………201 Reliving Dislocation: “Leaves from the Mental Portfolio of an Eurasian”…..211 Othering the Self and Turning the Tables: The Promised Land……………...224 V. EMPATHY, PERSPECTIVE, AND (MIS)JUDGMENTS IN MODERNIST FICTION……………………………………………………………..241 Judgment, Empathy, and Fantasy in The Great Gatsby………………………247 Empathy Through Deracialization and Focalization: Their Eyes Were Watching God…………………………………………………………………258 Misreading “the Other” as a Strategy of Narrative Empathy in Go Down, Moses………………………………………………………………268 CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………………….285 WORKS CITED……………………………………………………………………………291 vi Introduction FEELING THEIR PAIN: NARRATIVE EMPATHY AND “OTHERS” IN AMERICAN LITERATURE AND THE WESTERN PHILOSOPHICAL TRADITION Conversations across boundaries of identity—whether national, religious, or something else—begin with the sort of imaginative engagement you get when you read a novel or watch a movie or attend to a work of art that speaks from some place other than your own. —K. Anthony Appiah, Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers (2006) In the opening chapters of Moby-Dick, when the white, male, native-born, and ostensibly Christian protagonist submits to sharing a bed with a “head-peddling savage” named Queequeg and subsequently resolves to “try a pagan friend,” Ishmael attempts to focus on the shared qualities of a fellow human, despite the radical and categorical differences between the two (34, 56). “The man’s a human being just as I am,” Ishmael considers. “Better [to] sleep with a sober cannibal than a drunken Christian” (36). This school of thought might be called narrative empathy for “the Other.” Queequeg is a foreigner by birth; he speaks in heavily accented English (when he speaks the language at all); he practices a religion that Ishmael does not understand; his athletic prowess borders on the bestial, and his culinary preferences (raw meat, whenever possible) hint darkly toward cannibalism. Ishmael’s attempts to overlook these differences—which his first-person narrative presents as noble and earnest gestures—allow him to praise Queequeg’s unselfishness, courage, and tact, and to imagine their mutual fates tethered together, just as their bodies become linked by the eponymous “monkey-rope” of Chapter 72. 1 But Ishmael’s imaginative identification with his strange bedfellow is not fully sustained throughout his narrative; as he grows more confident aboard the Pequod, his need for a “pagan friend” gradually diminishes (as do Queequeg’s appearances in the text). Over the course of the novel, Queequeg grows increasingly silent
Recommended publications
  • Gaytan to Marin Donald Cutter the Spanish Legend, That
    The Spanish in Hawaii: Gaytan to Marin Donald Cutter The Spanish legend, that somehow Spain anticipated all other Europeans in its discovery and presence in most every part of the New World, extends even to the Pacific Ocean area. Spain's early activity in Alaska, Canada, Washington, Oregon, and California reinforces the idea that Spain was also the early explorer of the Pacific Islands. The vast Pacific, from its European discovery in Panama by Vasco Nunez de Balboa, until almost the end of the 18th Century, was part of the Spanish overseas empire. Generous Papal recognition of Spain's early discoveries and an attempt to avert an open conflict between Spain and Portugal resulted in a division of the non-Christian world between those Iberian powers. Though north European nations were not in accord and the King of France even suggested that he would like to see the clause in Adam's will giving the Pope such sweeping jurisdiction, Spain was convinced of its exclusive sovereignty over the Pacific Ocean all the way to the Philippine Islands. Spain strengthened both the Papal decree and the treaty signed with Portugal at Tordasillas by observing the niceties of international law. In 1513, Nunez de Balboa waded into the Pacific, banner in hand, and in a single grandiose act of sovereignty claimed the ocean and all of its islands for Spain. It was a majestic moment in time—nearly one third of the world was staked out for exclusive Spanish control by this single imperial act. And Spain was able to parlay this act of sovereignty into the creation of a huge Spanish lake of hundreds of thousands of square miles, a body of water in which no other European nation could sail in peaceful commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Underrepresented Communities Historic Resource Survey Report
    City of Madison, Wisconsin Underrepresented Communities Historic Resource Survey Report By Jennifer L. Lehrke, AIA, NCARB, Rowan Davidson, Associate AIA and Robert Short, Associate AIA Legacy Architecture, Inc. 605 Erie Avenue, Suite 101 Sheboygan, Wisconsin 53081 and Jason Tish Archetype Historic Property Consultants 2714 Lafollette Avenue Madison, Wisconsin 53704 Project Sponsoring Agency City of Madison Department of Planning and Community and Economic Development 215 Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard Madison, Wisconsin 53703 2017-2020 Acknowledgments The activity that is the subject of this survey report has been financed with local funds from the City of Madison Department of Planning and Community and Economic Development. The contents and opinions contained in this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the city, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the City of Madison. The authors would like to thank the following persons or organizations for their assistance in completing this project: City of Madison Richard B. Arnesen Satya Rhodes-Conway, Mayor Patrick W. Heck, Alder Heather Stouder, Planning Division Director Joy W. Huntington Bill Fruhling, AICP, Principal Planner Jason N. Ilstrup Heather Bailey, Preservation Planner Eli B. Judge Amy L. Scanlon, Former Preservation Planner Arvina Martin, Alder Oscar Mireles Marsha A. Rummel, Alder (former member) City of Madison Muriel Simms Landmarks Commission Christina Slattery Anna Andrzejewski, Chair May Choua Thao Richard B. Arnesen Sheri Carter, Alder (former member) Elizabeth Banks Sergio Gonzalez (former member) Katie Kaliszewski Ledell Zellers, Alder (former member) Arvina Martin, Alder David W.J. McLean Maurice D. Taylor Others Lon Hill (former member) Tanika Apaloo Stuart Levitan (former member) Andrea Arenas Marsha A.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3-‐1 Historic Resources Evaluation
    Appendix 3-1 Historic Resources Evaluation HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION SEAWALL LOT 337 & Pier 48 Mixed-Use Development Project San Francisco, California April 11, 2016 Prepared by San Francisco, California Historic Resource Evaluation Seawall Lot 337 & Pier 48 Mixed-Use Project, San Francisco, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 II. Methods ................................................................................................................................... 1 III. Regulatory Framework ....................................................................................................... 3 IV. Property Description ................................................................................................... ….....6 V. Historical Context ....................................................................................................... ….....24 VI. Determination of Eligibility.................................................................................... ……....44 VII. Evaluation of the Project for Compliance with the Standards ............................. 45 VIII. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 58 IX. Bibliography ........................................................................................................................ 59 April 11, 2016 Historic Resource Evaluation Seawall
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Christopher Newell Williams 2008
    Copyright by Christopher Newell Williams 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Christopher Newell Williams certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: CAUGHT IN THE WEB OF SCAPEGOATING: NATIONAL PRESS COVERAGE OF CALIFORNIA’S PROPOSITION 187 Committee: ________________________________ Robert Jensen, Supervisor ________________________________ D. Charles Whitney, Co-Supervisor ________________________________ Gene Burd ________________________________ Dustin Harp ________________________________ S. Craig Watkins CAUGHT IN THE WEB OF SCAPEGOATING: NATIONAL COVERAGE OF CALIFORNIA’S PROPOSITION 187 by Christopher Newell Williams, BA; MS Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2008 Dedication To Sue, my wife and the love of my life, whose unwavering friendship, love and commitment made this long road incalculably easier to travel. Acknowledgments Many thanks to the faculty and staff of the School of Journalism at the University of Texas at Austin, who, in countless ways, offered a helping hand on this journey. More specifically, I’d like to thank my dissertation committee, whose guidance and wise counsel were essential in shaping this project. The original members were Chuck Whitney, Bob Jensen, Don Heider, David Montejano and Craig Watkins. After Don and David were no longer able to serve on the committee, Gene Burd and Dustin Harp graciously agreed to replace them. Many thanks to all of you for your work on my behalf. I’m especially grateful for the support of Chuck Whitney, the original chairman of my committee, whose wide-ranging knowledge and high standards enriched every chapter of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Separated by a Common Language? the Complicated Relationship Between American & British English
    Separated by a Common Language? The complicated relationship between American & British English Lynne Murphy University of Sussex Sponsored by the Department of Linguistics, Department of Communication, and Department of English 4:00-6:00 April 16, 2018 Hellems 199 Refreshments will Be served When faced with British English, Americans are apt to Be impressed and are often made a Bit insecure aBout their own linguistic aBilities. When thinKing aBout American English, Britons often express dismissiveness or fear. This has Been going on for nearly 300 years, developing into a complex mythology of British–American linguistic relations. This talK looKs into the current state of the “special relationship” between the two national standards. How did we get to the point that the BBC publishes headlines like “How Americanisms are Killing the English language” while Americans tweet “Everything sounds Better in a British accent”? The answer is in a Broad set of proBlematic Beliefs. We’ll looK at how different the two national Englishes are (and why they’re not more different), why neither has claim to Being older than the other, and why technology isn’t maKing us all speaK or write the same English. About the speaKer: Lynne Murphy is Professor of Linguistics at the University of Sussex in Brighton, England. Since 2006, her alter ego Lynneguist has written the Separated by a Common Language blog. There, she reflects on UK–US linguistic differences from the perspective of an American linguist in England, while fighting the good fight against linguistic myths and prejudice. She continues that fight in The Prodigal Tongue: The Love–Hate Relationship between American and British English (Penguin, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Designed to Supplement Eleventh Grade U.S. History Textbooks, The
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 258 854 SO 016 495 TITLE The Immigrant Experience: A Polish-American Model. Student Materials. INSTITUTION Social Studies Development %.enter, Bloomington, Ind. SPONS AGENCY Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (ED), Washington, DC. Ethnic Heritage Studies Program. # .PUB DATE Jan 83 CONTRACT G008100438 NOTE 79p.; For teacher's guide, see ED 230 .451. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Use Materials (For Learner) (051) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Civil War (United States); Cultural Pluralism; *Ethnic Studies; Grade 11; High Schools; *Immigrants; 'Industrialization; *Interdiiciplinary Approach; Learning Activities; Models; Modern History; *Polish Americans; Reconstruction Era; Revolutionary War (United States); *United States History ABSTRACT Designed to supplement eleventh grade U.S. history textbooks, the self-contained activities in this student guide will help students learn about Polish immigration to America. Intended for use with an accompanyingteacher's guide, the activities are organized '.round five themes:(1) the colonial period: early Polish-American influence;(2) the American Revolution through the Civil War: Polish American perspectives; (3) Reconstruction and immigration;(4) immigration and industrialization; and (5) contemporary issues, concerns, and perspectives. Studenti read, discuss, and answer questions about short reading selections including "Poles in Jamestown," "Influential Poles in Colonial America," "European Factors Influencing Polish Immigration and Settlement in Colonial America," "Tadeusz Kosciuszko (1746-1817)," "Silesian Poles in Texas," "Learning about America and Preparing to Leave Silesia," "Polish Migration and Attitudes in the Post-Revolutionary Period (1783-1860's), "Examples of One Extreme Opinion of a Southern Polish Immigrant," "Reconstruction and Silesian Poles in Panna Maria Texas," "United States Immigration Policy: 1793-1965," "Poletown," "The Polish American Community," and "Current Trends in U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NMAP Background 2021-0601
    NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE Bringing All Americans Together Background Proposal for a Bipartisan Presidential Commission To Study National Museum of the American People VISION The National Museum of the American People will present the dramatic story about the making of the American People. Our compelling history, about peoples crossing oceans and continents to come to this land and nation, begins with the first humans in the Western Hemisphere and continues through today. It will celebrate all who became Americans, whether from Europe, Africa, Asia and Pacific Islands or the Americas. It is the greatest epic saga in human history and the museum will endeavor to be one of the most powerful story-telling museums anywhere. It will take visitors along an absorbing, dynamic pathway that becomes rooted in our Constitution. Scholarly based, the museum will help unify the American People and foster civics education. For all Americans, the NMAP will tell their story about becoming an American and the stories of their family, friends, neighbors and coworkers; their tribe; their city, state and region. It will encompass their ethnic, nationality, and minority histories. PLAN The plan calls for a Presidential Commission to study the feasibility of the museum. We are approaching both the White House and Congress to support the study. Following the final feasibility study report, we would seek legislation to create an entity to plan and build the museum and to raise the funds necessary to plan and build it. If the feasibility study is established in 2021 and the museum entity is created soon thereafter, ground could be broken in 2022 and the museum could open in 2028.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Gangs in the United States
    1 ❖ History of Gangs in the United States Introduction A widely respected chronicler of British crime, Luke Pike (1873), reported the first active gangs in Western civilization. While Pike documented the existence of gangs of highway robbers in England during the 17th century, it does not appear that these gangs had the features of modern-day, serious street gangs. Later in the 1600s, London was “terrorized by a series of organized gangs calling themselves the Mims, Hectors, Bugles, Dead Boys [and they] fought pitched battles among themselves dressed with colored ribbons to distinguish the different factions” (Pearson, 1983, p. 188). According to Sante (1991), the history of street gangs in the United States began with their emer- gence on the East Coast around 1783, as the American Revolution ended. These gangs emerged in rapidly growing eastern U.S. cities, out of the conditions created in large part by multiple waves of large-scale immigration and urban overcrowding. This chapter examines the emergence of gang activity in four major U.S. regions, as classified by the U.S. Census Bureau: the Northeast, Midwest, West, and South. The purpose of this regional focus is to develop a better understanding of the origins of gang activity and to examine regional migration and cultural influences on gangs themselves. Unlike the South, in the Northeast, Midwest, and West regions, major phases characterize gang emergence. Table 1.1 displays these phases. 1 2 ❖ GANGS IN AMERICA’S COMMUNITIES Table 1.1 Key Timelines in U.S. Street Gang History Northeast Region (mainly New York City) First period: 1783–1850s · The first ganglike groups emerged immediately after the American Revolution ended, in 1783, among the White European immigrants (mainly English, Germans, and Irish).
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity in Colonial Times
    03-Parrillo-45518:03-Parrillo-45518.qxd 4/21/2008 3:05 PM Page 39 3 Diversity in Colonial Times “The Scold” (1885) is an engraving by an unknown artist that depicts a New England colonial street scene with a woman wearing a scold’s bridle. Those who blasphemed, lied, or gossiped excessively had to wear this iron mask with a flat spike to curb their tongues. 39 03-Parrillo-45518:03-Parrillo-45518.qxd 4/21/2008 3:05 PM Page 40 40—— Diversity in America hat most people remember about early U.S. history is that the 13 WEnglish colonies fought for their independence from the “Mother Country” of England. Because the English held cultural and political preem- inence in the colonial and early national periods, this myth of cultural homo- geneity arose. The actions and/or writings of contemporary English American leaders, historians, and literary figures enhanced the myth, and their domi- nance and influence cast a long shadow across subsequent generations. The Larger Context Colonial America existed on the periphery of the “civilized world.” Although England was dominant in its cultural, economic, and political influence, Europe also exerted a profound impact. For example, the Age of Enlightenment— an 18th-century philosophical movement that embraced rationalism, empha- sized learning, and encouraged a spirit of skepticism and practicality in social and political thought—guided the Founding Fathers in their thinking and eventual formulation of a new nation. Before the new republic became a reality, however, what occurred in colonial thoughts, words, and actions reflected, for the most part, the dominance of European culture, both abstract (values, ideas) and material (fashions, manufactured goods).
    [Show full text]
  • Germans Settling North America : Going Dutch – Gone American
    Gellinek Going Dutch – Gone American Christian Gellinek Going Dutch – Gone American Germans Settling North America Aschendorff Münster Printed with the kind support of Carl-Toepfer-Stiftung, Hamburg, Germany © 2003 Aschendorff Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Münster Das Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Die dadurch begründeten Rechte, insbesondere die der Überset- zung, des Nachdrucks, der Entnahme von Abbildungen, der Funksendung, der Wiedergabe auf foto- mechanischem oder ähnlichem Wege und der Speicherung in Datenverarbeitungsanlagen bleiben, auch bei nur auszugsweiser Verwertung, vorbehalten. Die Vergütungsansprüche des § 54, Abs. 2, UrhG, werden durch die Verwertungsgesellschaft Wort wahrgenommen. Druck: Druckhaus Aschendorff, Münster, 2003 Gedruckt auf säurefreiem, alterungsbeständigem Papier ∞ ISBN 3-402-05182-6 This Book is dedicated to my teacher of Comparative Anthropology at Yale Law School from 1961 to 1963 F. S. C. Northrop (1893–1992) Sterling Professor of Philosophy and Law, author of the benchmark for comparative philosophy, Philosophical Anthropology and Practical Politics This Book has two mottoes which bifurcate as the topic =s divining rod The first motto is by GERTRUDE STEIN [1874–1946], a Pennsylvania-born woman of letters, raised in California, and expatriate resident of Europe after 1903: AIn the United States there is more space where nobody is than where anybody is. That is what makes America what it is.@1 The second motto has to do with the German immigration. It is borrowed from a book by THEODOR FONTANE [1819–1898], a Brandenburg-born writer, and a critic of Prussia. An old German woman, whose grandchildren have emigrated to Anmerica is speaking in her dialect of Low German: [ADröwen in Amirika.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complexity of German-American History During World War I
    1 The Complexity of German-American History during World War I Carrie M. Griffin Phone Number: 219-221-5322 [email protected] Purdue Northwest Senior with one semester left 2 Before World War I most German-Americans in Indiana lived comfortably and were respected by their communities. Germans comprised one of the largest immigrant groups coming to America before 1914.1 Leading up to the war, German-Americans sent their children to parish schools that taught in German, read German newspapers, attended services at German churches, and belonged to German community organizations. Despite these ethnic attachments, Indiana Germans considered themselves Americans. “Most Germans thought themselves as Americans totally loyal to American democratic ideals.”2 This essay will investigate the experiences of German-Americans in Michigan City, Indiana and the effects of the First World War on their community. In 1910, The U. S. Census reported Indiana as having the twelfth largest German population among the states, with Germans making up the largest group of immigrant group statewide.3 Indiana historically was made up of Old Stock English-Americans with smaller immigrant populations than neighboring states. Over time, however, there was an intermingling of Germans with non-Germans, and as a result Indiana tended to have a more blended culture. “German societies played a strong role in the development of music, the arts, and a vigorous social life in Indiana’s cities, organizing parades, picnics, dances, and feasts. Through such events German traditions and styles gradually were incorporated into America’s way of life.”4 It was common for non-German residents to attend distinctly German activities such as Oktober- fest since they viewed it as a town function rather than an ethnic event.
    [Show full text]
  • Racism and the American Indian Bethany Berger University of Connecticut School of Law
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Faculty Articles and Papers School of Law 2009 Red: Racism and the American Indian Bethany Berger University of Connecticut School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_papers Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Berger, Bethany, "Red: Racism and the American Indian" (2009). Faculty Articles and Papers. 265. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_papers/265 +(,121/,1( Citation: 56 UCLA L. Rev. 591 2008-2009 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Mon Aug 15 16:42:05 2016 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0041-5650 RED: RACISM AND THE AMERICAN INDIAN & Bethany R. Berger How does racism work in American Indian law and policy? Scholarship on the subject too often has assumed that racism works for Indians in the same way that it does for African Americans, and has therefore either emphasized the presence of hallmarks of black-white racism, such as uses of blood quantum, as evidence of racism, or has emphasized the lack of such hallmarks, such as prohibitions on interracial marriage, to argue that racism is not a significant factor. This Article surveys the different eras of Indian-white interaction to argue that racism has been important in those interactions, but has worked in a distinctive way.
    [Show full text]