The Fens Waterways and the Lincolnshire Waterways Partnership

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Fens Waterways and the Lincolnshire Waterways Partnership The Fens Waterways and the Lincolnshire Waterways Partnership Key ---- = Fens Waterways Link ---- = River Navigations ---- = Canal / Navigable Drains ----- = Non navigable / Extinct navigations • Connecting overview of Lincoln to Ely • Contiguous link from Lincoln to Cambridge and Northampton and beyond Critical linkages to allow navigation between Lincoln and Ely Benefits of Fenland Waterways Economic regeneration and employment benefits Enhanced tourism, cultural, heritage, educational and recreational / sport opportunities Landscape and environmental benefits Improved water supplies (storage, transfer and land drainage) Local and regional transport routes Public access routes: cycleways, bridleways and footpaths Mixed residential and business development Modify or eliminate tidal navigation 200,000 new day visitors per year = £10m+ per year Lincolnshire Waterways Partnership 2002-12 Unique cooperative approach in Lincolnshire between Lincolnshire County Council, the Environment Agency and British Waterways Important first link from Boston to River Glen Memorandum of Understanding signed in 2003 First bid – Waterways 1 was submitted for ERDF funds Project funded by 16 local, regional and national bodies Developed effective delivery mechanism by dividing the projects between the parties Between 2003-12 LWP has managed £18m of projects . Lincolnshire has over 1000km of waterways, but tidally locked . Waterway infrastructure poor and in need of investment – not meeting its potential . Opening up our rivers & canals via Fens Waterway Link would put further pressure on that network The £18m of projects involved: Bridges & Locks Nature Reserves Moorings Facilities for boaters Slipways Facilities for anglers Waterside cycle paths Water Rail Way created on the old railway line between Lincoln & Boston – huge success for tourists but also has over 100k commuter movements each year Wins for locals & tourists • EA took clay from this riverside site to make new flood defences • After removal, LWP created a nature reserve complete with bird hide, car park, paths, interpretation & its own mooring • Wins for environment, flood defence, tourists & locals Wins for boaters, tourists & locals Sleaford Bridge & Four Mile Bar Bridge – both are replacement bridges that enable navigation & are DDA compliant Phase 1 of Fens Link was to connect the River Witham to Black Sluice Drain at Boston EA wanted to raise standard of flood defences at Boston – working with LWP the projects were amalgamated into a Combined Strategy (flood defence & waterways) the first time that such a strategy had been produced New lock completed end 2008 & first phase of Fens Link opened Next phase of the Combined Strategy will see a Barrier created at Boston To ensure that it has waterway as well as flood defence capabilities Lincolnshire County Council has committed £11m towards the Barrier Wins for flood defence, boaters, tourists & locals Conclusions Cooperative approach to Waterways CAN work Requires national and local support Project “ticks all the right boxes” in an area which has population with low GDP / Head Clearly significant resource implications Further information and contacts: www.fenswaterways.com www.environment-agency.gov.uk Paul Separovic Environment Agency Fens Waterways Link Partnerships Manager [email protected].
Recommended publications
  • Ely Circular Ely Circular (Extended)
    Ely Circular Ely Circular (extended) 1st walk check 2nd walk check 3rd walk check 1st walk check 2nd walk check 3rd walk check 25th Sept. 2016 12th Sept. 2016 Current status Document last updated Monday, 24th July 2017 This document and information herein are copyrighted to Saturday Walkers’ Club. If you are interested in printing or displaying any of this material, Saturday Walkers’ Club grants permission to use, copy, and distribute this document delivered from this World Wide Web server with the following conditions: The document will not be edited or abridged, and the material will be produced exactly as it appears. Modification of the material or use of it for any other purpose is a violation of our copyright and other proprietary rights. Reproduction of this document is for free distribution and will not be sold. This permission is granted for a one-time distribution. All copies, links, or pages of the documents must carry the following copyright notice and this permission notice: Saturday Walkers’ Club, Copyright © 2016-2017, used with permission. All rights reserved. www.walkingclub.org.uk This walk has been checked as noted above, however the publisher cannot accept responsibility for any problems encountered by readers. Ely Circular Start: Ely station Finish: Ely station Ely station, map reference TL 543 793, is 23 km north east of Cambridge, 102 km north north east of Charing Cross, 5m above sea level, and in East Cambridgeshire. Length: 18.0 km (11.2 mi), of which 4.3 km (2.7 mi) on tarmac or concrete. Cumulative ascent/descent: 108m.
    [Show full text]
  • Oosthuizen, MSR, DB Fenland, 30 Jan 2015
    RE-EVALUATING MAPS OF DOMESDAY POPULATION DENSITIES: A case study from the Cambridgeshire fenland By SUSAN OOSTHUIZEN Abstract Professor Sir Clifford Darby’s county, regional and national maps of a range of data drawn from the Domesday Book revolutionized scholarship on the social and economic history of late Anglo-Saxon England (e.g. 1935, 1936a, 1936b, 1971, 1977). While this paper does not seek to challenge Darby’s general conclusions, a case study re-examination of the inter-relationship between population density and physical geography in the Cambridgeshire fenland in 1086 suggests the regional usefulness of methodological adjustments to his mapping. It indicates that the population density of the peat and silt fens in the late eleventh century may have been significantly higher than that shown in Darby’s original maps, with implications for the contemporary social and economic history of eastern England. Introduction The magnificence of many fenland churches allows even a complete stranger to infer the large numbers of inhabitants in and general prosperity of the region during the middle ages (Illustration 1, Figure 1). Its affluence is confirmed in the lay subsidies of 1327, 1332 and 1334. Settlements on the silt fens (for which there is the most information) were so prosperous that they generated among the highest returns per square mile and per vill in England, as well as some of the highest rates per taxpayer (Campbell and Bartley 2006: Maps 18.3, 18.13). Although only 20% of English settlements paid more than £225 in 1334, that select group includes not only Ely (paying £358), Leverington (paying £360), and Wisbech (paying £410) but almost every other silt fen vill (Glasscock 1973: 181-3; 1975: 28, 107, 168-9).
    [Show full text]
  • Walkover Habitat Survey Welton Beck, Lincolnshire November 2016
    Walkover Habitat Survey Welton Beck, Lincolnshire November 2016 Contents Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Catchment Overview .................................................................................................................................... 5 Habitat Assessment ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Old Man’s Head Spring (SK 99687 79449) to Ryland Bridge (TF 01893 79957) ........................................ 6 Ryland Bridge (TF 01893 79957) to A46 Market Rasen Road (TF 02961 79508) .................................... 17 A46 Market Rasen Road (TF0296179508) to Barlings Eau confluence (TF 05179 79366) ...................... 26 Opportunities for Habitat Improvements ................................................................................................... 34 River re‐naturalisation projects .............................................................................................................. 34 Channel narrowing .................................................................................................................................. 37 Pool creation ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Witches and Witchcraft in Ely
    Witches and Witchcraft in Ely A HISTORY Francis Young Printed for the author by Cambridge Print Solutions Cambridge, 2013 Published by Francis Young © Francis Young 2013 Francis Young has asserted his moral right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the author of this work. francisyoung.wordpress.com ISBN 978-0-9926404-0-8 Table of Contents Introduction 1 1. Hereward and the Witch 3 2. A Necromancer in the Lady Chapel 5 3. Witchcraft and the Reformation 9 4. Witchfinders in Ely 11 5. Witchcraft in Ely in Modern Times 15 Notes 20 Introduction The Cambridgeshire Fens are one of the last places in England where traditional belief in witchcraft was widespread. Until as late as the mid-twentieth century, Fenland communities were isolated, and their inhabitants were more vulnerable to environmental illnesses, such as malaria, than the rest of the population. A hard life, geographical isolation, close-knit communities and mistrust of outsiders may all have contributed to the Fenlanders’ abiding belief in the power of witchcraft. Ely’s place in the history of English witchcraft is a special one. As the cathedral city at the heart of the Fens, under the independent jurisdiction of the Bishop, Ely was the place where anyone locally accused of witchcraft would be brought to trial. The city was the hub from which John Stearne completed the last stage of Matthew Hopkins’s infamous witch-hunt in the 1640s, and Ely was the scene for the (quite literal) downfall of the first ‘witch’ to appear in English history.
    [Show full text]
  • River Witham the Source of the 8Th Longest River Wholly in England Is
    River Witham The source of the 8th longest river wholly in England is just outside the county, Lincolnshire, through which it follows almost all of a 132km course to the sea, which is shown on the map which accompanies Table Wi1 at the end of the document. Three kilometres west of the village of South Witham, on a minor road called Fosse Lane, a sign points west over a stile to a nature reserve. There, the borders of 3 counties, Lincolnshire, Rutland and Leicestershire meet. The reserve is called Cribb’s Meadow, named for a famous prize fighter of the early 19th century; at first sight a bizarre choice at such a location, though there is a rational explanation. It was known as Thistleton Gap when Tom Cribb had a victory here in a world championship boxing match against an American, Tom Molineaux, on 28th September 1811; presumably it was the only time he was near the place, as he was a Bristolian who lived much of his life in London. The organisers of bare-knuckle fights favoured venues at such meeting points of counties, which were distant from centres of population; they aimed to confuse Justices of the Peace who had a duty to interrupt the illegal contests. Even if the responsible Justices managed to attend and intervene, a contest might be restarted nearby, by slipping over the border into a different jurisdiction. In this fight, which bore little resemblance to the largely sanitised boxing matches of today, it is certain that heavy blows were landed, blood was drawn, and money changed hands, before Cribb won in 11 rounds; a relatively short fight, as it had taken him over 30 rounds to beat the same opponent at the end of the previous year to win his title.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Visit River Witham, Marston, Lincolnshire April 2015
    Advisory Visit River Witham, Marston, Lincolnshire April 2015 1.0 Introduction This report is the output of a site visit undertaken by Tim Jacklin of the Wild Trout Trust to the River Witham, Marston, Lincolnshire on 16th April, 2014. Comments in this report are based on observations on the day of the site visit and discussions with Ken Ordish (landowner representative) and Matthew Parr (Environment Agency Fisheries Technical Officer). Normal convention is applied throughout the report with respect to bank identification, i.e. the banks are designated left hand bank (LHB) or right hand bank (RHB) whilst looking downstream. 2.0 Catchment / Fishery Overview The section of river visited is located just to the east of the village of Marston, about 6km north of Grantham, Lincolnshire, at Mill Farm (National Grid Reference SK9015543020). Approximately 1 km of river was inspected, with the weir at Mill Farm in the middle of the reach. The upper Witham flows off oolitic limestone geology in the Lincolnshire and Rutland Limestone Natural Area (www.naturalareas.naturalengland.org.uk/Science/natural/profiles%5CnaProfile38.pdf), hence is a calcium-rich, lowland river. The Witham around Grantham supports a trout fishery and many sections are controlled and managed by Grantham Angling Association Fly Fishing Section (GAAFFS). The reach immediately upstream of the section visited is controlled by GAAFFS. Over recent centuries, and particularly the last 100 years, the once naturally meandering river channel of the Witham has been straightened, deepened, widened, impounded and embanked as part of fluvial engineering schemes designed to reduce flood risk and improve land drainage.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper River Witham: Great Ponton Version 1.1 (14.02.14)
    River Habitat Enhancement Case Studies Upper River Witham: Great Ponton Version 1.1 (14.02.14) Location: Great Ponton, Lincolnshire (c3.5km south of Grantham) Upstream Grid Ref: SK929304 Length: 675m Completion Date: End February 2013 Cost: Fords: £11K, Fencing and willow layering £6.8K: Total £17.8K (this does not include the first phase undertaken in 2008) Partners: The scheme was implemented by the Environment Agency with the co-operation and agreement of the adjacent landowner (Stephen Jackson). Grantham Angling Association Fly Fishing Section (GAAFFS) assisted with site selection and landowner negotiations. © Steve Brayshaw © Steve Summary of Techniques: Channel narrowing and flow deflection using woody debris augmented by willow layering; ford refurbishment and riverside fencing to reduce sediment inputs. Location Map © Crown Copyright 2013. OS Licence number 100026380. Background The Upper River Witham rises west of South Witham and flows for more than 65 km northwards through Colsterworth, Great Ponton, Grantham, Long Bennington, Bassingham and North Hykeham towards Lincoln. More than 165 km of river and tributary streams drain the c573 km2 catchment. The landscape of the catchment is varied in character, ranging from the livestock-dominated limestone valleys upstream from Grantham, through the mixed farming terrain of the middle reaches, to the flat-lying arable farmlands downstream from Long Bennington. Over recent centuries, and particularly the last 100 years, the once naturally meandering river channels have been straightened, deepened, widened, impounded and embanked to reduce flood risk and improve land drainage. These modifications, together with catchment land management practices, have contributed to a decline in river corridor habitat quality.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the UNIVERSITY of LINCOLN the Behaviour and Ecology of Adult
    THE UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN The behaviour and ecology of adult common bream Abramis brama (L.) in a heavily modified lowland river A Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Christopher John Gardner B.Sc. (Hons) September 2013 1 CONTENTS Publications and outputs 5 List of tables 6 List of figures 7 Acknowledgements 12 Abstract 13 1. Rivers, fish and human interventions 15 1.1 General introduction 15 1.2 Objectives 17 1.3 A ‘natural’ lowland riverine ecosystem 17 1.4 Anthropogenic impacts on lowland riverine ecosystems 18 1.5 Fish ecology and rivers 21 1.6 Common bream ecology 23 1.7 Studying spatio-temporal behaviour of fishes with telemetry techniques 29 1.8 Proposed study 33 2. The ecology of the lower River Witham 35 2.1 Objectives 35 2.2 The lower River Witham 35 2.2.1 Background 35 2.2.2 History 36 2.2.3 Catchment and land use 39 2.2.4 Water quality 39 2.2.5 Biological quality 40 2.2.6 Flow regime and flood events 41 2.2.7 Water level management 43 2.2.8 Trent-Witham-Ancholme water transfer scheme 43 2.2.9 Morphology 43 2.2.10 Habitat assessments 45 2.2.11 Barriers to fish migration 49 2.2.12 River uses 49 2.2.13 Conservation 49 2.2.14 Fishery assessments 50 2.2.15 Water Framework Directive classification 57 2.3 Discussion 57 2.3.1 Water quality 57 2.3.2 Biological quality 58 2.3.3 Habitat assessments 58 2.3.4 Fishery assessments 58 3.
    [Show full text]
  • National Rivers Authority Anglian Region
    /V^i^c/AA^ |£ct 1 3 ^ l i T H £ ■ s • m V i !J 1..I < 1 ® E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE ANGLIAN REGION Kingfisher House. Goldhay Way, Orton Goldhay, Peterborough PE2 5ZR v ; NRA National Rivers Authority Anglian Region JANUARY 1996 KEY DETAILS Area 1370 km2 WATER QUALITY Population 97,673 General Quality Assessment of Rivers Ground Levels Maximum 120m ODN GQA Grade Km Minimum -lm ODN A 0 Highest Recorded Tide 5.75mODN B 0 C 14.1 ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS D 56.2 County Councils Lincolnshire E 25.1 District Councils North Kesteven F 0 South Kesteven East Lindsey Estuary Quality: Witham Haven 11km CEWP South Holland Grade A Borough Councils Boston Navigation British Waterways WATER RESOURCES AVAILABILITY Authorities (R Witham) 17.2 km Ground Water All availaBle resources are fully Port of Boston (Witham, committed. Haven) 10.6 km Surface Water Surface water is generally availaBle NRA Anglian Region - Northern during the winter period. At other Area times there is scope for development utilising resources which can Be Water Company Anglian Water Services Ltd made availaBle By taking advantage Major S.T.W Boston of river transfer schemes. Sleaford Anwick Internal Drainage Witham 4th FLOOD PROTECTION Boards Black Sluice Length of Statutory Main River 240km Witham 1st Length of NRA Tidal Defences 22km Skegness Length of NRA Sea Defences 20km SETTLEMENTS (> 3000 population) FISHERIES Boston 23200 Sleaford 14000 Length of cyprinid fishery 219km Length of salmonid fishery 4km Fishtoft 5300 Ruskington 4800 CONSERVATION Kirton 3900 Cranwell 3300 Sites of Special Scientific Interest 13 Sites of Nature Conservation Interest 28 UTILITIES Nature Reserve 12 East Midlands Electricity Scheduled Ancient Monuments 65 British Gas, East Midlands NAVIGATION British Telecom, PeterBorough District Navigation Structures 4 Operational Locks 10 Non-operational Locks Front Cover: Maud Foster Mill CONTENTS Page Number 1.
    [Show full text]
  • South Holland IDB: a Brief History
    South Holland IDB History A brief history of South Holland Internal Drainage Board The history of land drainage in the Fens and Marsh of South Holland in Lincolnshire is an ancient one: there was an intensive Roman British occupation in the Fens South of Whaplode and Holbeach where the land level, today ranging between + 2.15 metres and 3.05 metres O.D.N., must then have been much higher relative to the Spring tide level. Towards the end of the 4th. Century A.D. there was a period of subsidence with consequent flooding, and it is not until the 11th.Century that the Doomsday Book reveals that a narrow strip perhaps two miles wide on either side of the main road from Long Sutton to Spalding had been re-occupied and cultivated. It was bounded on the North by the so-called Roman Bank, beyond which lay the salt marshes and the sea, and on the South by a line of banks which protected it against the fresh water floods from the Rivers Welland and Nene. The settlers in this narrow strip soon began to follow their time honoured practice of inning or embarking land: banks were built to recover land both from the salt marshes, where there had been a thriving salt making industry - dating back to pre-Roman times and from the Fen. The basic pattern was founded on the individual parish: no village trusted its neighbour to keep their banks safe, so that the inhabitants of each, built lateral banks known as headings to join their Fen bank to the Roman Bank and then constructed a River or drain running from the southern end of the parish to the Roman Bank and thence into the sea.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, November 22, 1864. 5633
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, NOVEMBER 22, 1864. 5633 of the old River Witham and Barlings Ban, such And to deepen, widen, and alter, or remove, and works commencing at or near the junction of the . rebuild all other locks, bridges, sluices, milldams, old River Witham with the River Witham, in the '( staunches, floodgates, tunnels, haling paths, works, said parishes of Bardney and,, Branston or one and conveniences upon the said River Witham, of them, near Horsley Deeps Lock, and ter- ioutk Delph, the old River Witham, Barlings Eau, minating at or near Barlings Abbey Ruins, in the Jillinghay Skirth, Horncastle Navigation, and said parish of Barlings, and to widen, deepen, £yme Eau, or Sleaford Navigation respectively, scour, and otherwise improve or alter the tribu- >etween 'the respective commencements and termi- tary streams, drains, and watercourses falling into nations of the works hereinbefore mentioned; the old River Witham and Barlings Eau, between o alter the level of the top water therein, to alter those points, all which works are intended to be he level of and to stop up, alter, divert, or other- made and maintained from, in, through, or into the wise interfere with, either temporarily or perma- parishes, townships, and places following, or some nently, all'turnpike roads, public carriage roads of them, that is to say, Barlings, Stainfield, or other roads or ways, haling-paths, drains, Fiskerton, and Bardney, in the parts of Lindsey, streams, canals or railways, which it may bo and Branston, in the parts of Kesteven, in the necessary to interfere with for the purposes of the .county of Lincoln.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln Policy Area Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Volume
    Lincoln Policy Area Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Volume One: Non-Technical Summary FINAL REPORT February 2010 The Lincoln Policy Area Partners JBA Office JBA Consulting Magna House South Street Atherstone Warwickshire CV9 1DF JBA Project Manager David Pettifer Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to Initial Draft Report September 2009 Toby Forbes-Turner (1 copy) Greg Smith (1 copy) Toby Forbes-Turner (1 copy) Final Draft report November 2009 Greg Smith (1 copy) Toby Forbes-Turner (9 Final Report February 2010 copies) Greg Smith (1 copy) Contract This report describes work commissioned by The City of Lincoln Council, on behalf of The Lincoln Policy Area Partners. The City of Lincoln Council ‟s representative for the contract was Toby Forbes-Turner. Matthew Hemsworth of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by ....................................................................... Matthew Hemsworth BSc MSc Assistant Analyst Reviewed by ...................................................................... Karen Shuttleworth BEng Senior Engineer Purpose This document has been prepared as a draft report (initial stage) for The City of Lincoln Council. JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the Client for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. JBA Consulting has no liability regarding the use of this report except to The City of Lincoln Council. 2009s3710 FINAL SFRA Volume 1 Non Technical.docx i Acknowledgments JBA would like to thank all those at Lincoln City Council, the Environment Agency and IDB's who provided information and data to support this project. Their assistance is gratefully acknowledged. Copyright © Jeremy Benn Associates Limited 2010 Carbon Footprint 388g A printed copy of this document will result in a carbon footprint of 305g if 100% post- consumer recycled paper is used and 388g if primary-source paper is used.
    [Show full text]