DOCSLIB.ORG

The President of the United States Transmitting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The President of the United States Transmitting 93d Congress, 2d Session House Document No. 93-403 PROPOSED ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM COMMUNICATION FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TRANSMITTING PROPOSALS FOR THIRTY-SEVEN ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM AND DEFERRAL OF ACTION ON FIVE AREAS SUITABLE FOR INCLUSION IN THE SYSTEM, AND RECOMMENDATIONS AGAINST THE INCLUSION OF FOUR OTHER AREAS STUDIED, PURSUANT TO SECTION 3 OF THE WILDER- NESS ACT OF 1964 [16 USC 1132] PART 25 MEDICINE LAKE WILDERNESS MONTANA DECEMBER 4, 1974.— Referred to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs and ordered to be printed with illustrations. U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1974 THE WHITE HOUSE WAS HINGTO N December 4, 1974 Dear Mr. Speaker: Pursuant to the Wilderness Act of September 3, 1964, I am pleased to transmit herewith proposals for thirty-seven additions to the National Wilderness Preservation System. As described in the Wilderness Message that I am con- currently sending to the Congress today, the proposed new wilderness areas cover a total of over nine million primeval acres. In addition, the Secretary of the Interior has recommended that Congressional action on five other areas which include surface lands suitable for wilderness be deferred for the reasons set forth below: A. Three areas which are open to mining might be needed in the future to provide vital minerals for the Nation, but these areas have not been adequately surveyed for mineral deposits. The areas are the Kofa Game Range, Arizona; Charles Sheldon Antelope Range, Nevada and Oregon; and, Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Range, Montana. B. One area is subject to withdrawals for power purposes and additional study is needed of the West's potential energy needs before a wilderness decision can be made. This is Lake Mead National Recreation Area, located in Arizona and Nevada. C. Certain parts of one area are subject to selection by the village of Mekoryuk under the terms of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act and a wilderness recommenda- tion should be made only after the completion of the Native selection process. The area in question is the Nunivak National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. Four other possibilities considered by the Secretary of the Interior in his review of roadless areas of 5,000 acres or more were found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the Wilderness System: Deer Flat National Wildlife Refuge, Oregon and Idaho; Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge, Maryland; Mammoth Cave National Park, Kentucky; and, Upper Mississippi River Wildlife and Fish Refuge, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa and Illinois. I concur in this finding and in the other recommendations of the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture, all of which are transmitted herewith. Wilderness designation of both of these new wilderness areas and those already submitted that are pending be- fore the Congress would dramatically demonstrate our commitment to preserve America's irreplaceable heritage, and I urge the Congress to act promptly in this regard. Sincerely, The Honorable Carl Albert Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 United States Department of the Interior OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, B.C. 20240 JUN 2 0 1974 Dear Mr. President: It is with pleasure that I recommend the establishment of areas totaling approximately 11,366 acres in Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge as part of the National Wilderness Preservation System. The recommendation stems from this Department's responsibility under the Wilderness Act (78 Stat. 390) to recommend to the President areas within its jurisdiction suitable for designation as wilderness. Having reviewed potential areas in Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge, we conclude that 11,366 of the refuge's 31,^57 acres should be designated wilderness. Primarily a waterfowl production area, the Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge was established by Executive Order in 1936. It is located in northeastern Montana, along the Central Flyway. About ^0 percent of the refuge consists of lakes and ponds; about 57 percent is pasture and meadowland; and the remaining 3 percent is farmland. Waterfowl are most abundant on the refuge during the spring and fall migration periods: the peak fall population frequently exceeds a quarter of a million birds. Varied management programs, all designed to encourage waterfowl production or create food and nesting habitat, are conducted on the refuge: these include intensive water management activities on nearly all refuge water areas. With the recant discontinuance of motorboat activity in Medicine Lake, however, we consider this area and the Sandhills Unit of the refuge suitable for wilderness designation. A mineral survey of the refuge has not been made. In accordance with the requirements of the Wilderness Act, a public hearing on the recommendation was held at Medicine Lake, Montana, on March 16, 197^- Analyses of the hearing records and written expressions received, together with the letters received from other Federal agencies, are contained in the enclosed synopsis. Complete records have been compiled and are available for inspection by the public. Enclosed is a draft bill which, if enacted, would incorporate the recommended area of Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge into the National Wilderness Preservation System. Sincerely yours, Assistggt Secretary of the Interior The President The White House Washington, D. C. 20500 Enclosure A B. I. L_ L_ To designate certain lands in the Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge, Sheridan and Roosevelt Counties, Montana, as wilderness. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with section 3(c) of the Wilderness Act of September 3, 196*1 (78 Stat. 890, 892; 16 U.S.C. 1132(-c)), certain lands in the Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge, Montana, which comprise about 11,366 acres and which are depicted on a map entitled "Medicine Lake Wilderness Proposal", dated November 1973, are hereby designated as wilderness. SEC. 2. As soon as practicable after this Act takes effect, a map of the wilderness area and a description of its boundaries shall be filed with the Interior and Insular Affairs Committees of the United States Senate and the House of Representatives, and such map and description shall have the same force and effect as if included in this Act: Provided, however, That correction of clerical and typographical errors in such map and description may be made. SEC. 3. The area designated by this Act as wilderness shall be known as the "Medicine Lake Wilderness" and shall be administered by the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Wilderness Act governing areas designated by that Act as wilderness areas, and where appropriate any reference in that Act to the Secretary of Agriculture shall be deemed to be a reference to the Secretary of the Interior. SEC. 4. Subject to all valid rights existing on the date of enactment of this Act, lands designated as wilderness by this I Act are hereby withdrawn from all forms of appropriation under the mining laws and from disposition under all laws pertaining to mineral leasing and all amendments thereto. PUBLIC HEARING ANALYSIS MEDICINE LAKE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE On March 16, 197^ pursuant to the requirements of the Wilderness Act, a public hearing was held in Medicine Lake, Montana to ascertain public views on the desirability to include the Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge in the National Wilderness Preservation System. This hearing record remained open until April 16, 197^ in order to allow sufficient time for interested agencies and' individuals to submit written statements for inclusion in the official record. The public hearing was officially opened at 10 a.m. on March 16, 197** at the Medicine Lake High School, Medicine Lake, Montana. The hearing officer was Lotario D. Ortega, Field Solicitor, Albuquerque, Hew Mexico. Prepared statements were read by Mr. Ortega and Mr. Burton Rounds of the Billings Area Office. A slide presentation was given by Mr. Donald White, Refuge Manager of Medicine Lake NWR. The proposal made by the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife was as follows: "Approximately 11,366 acres of the Medicine Lake NWR are recommended for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. The remaining areas of the refuge were found not suitable." A total of 62 individuals attended the hearing. Five individuals presented statements. Mr. Donald Aldrich represented the National Wilderness Society and the Montana Wildlife Federation. Mr. Aldrich spoke in favor of the Bureau's proposal. Mr. Henry Crohn, Dagmar, Montana, represented Friends of the Farth and the Montana Wilderness Society. He also favored the proposal. Mr. Mike Aderhold represented the Montana Fish and Game and read a position statement that endorsed the Bureau's proposal for wilder- ness. Mr. Ed Smith, Dagmar, Montana, represented the Medicine Lake Wild- life Refuge Policy Action Committee and himself as a rancher. Mr. Smith did not take a positive position approving or disapproving the proposal but asked several questions as to what affects wilderness would impose on the management and the users of the refuge. Donald R. Marble represented the Montana Wilderness Association and supported the Bureau's proposal for wilderness designation of 11,366 acres. A question and answer session followed the presentation of formal state- ments. I terns such as future management of grazing, public use, and other economic uses as they relate to the wilderness units were discussed. No one opposed the designation( of wilderness as each of the items were discussed. The entire proceedings lasted 95 minutes, whereupon the hearing officer announced that the record would remain open for 30 days and officially concluded the hearing at 11:35 a.m. 42-797 O - 75 - pt.25 - 2 ANALYSIS OF WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE MEDICINE LAKE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Communications From Elected Officials Comments were received from the Governor of Montana and Montana Representative Harrison G.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Multiple Intrusions in the San Miguel Mountains, Colorado Calvin S
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/19 Multiple intrusions in the San Miguel Mountains, Colorado Calvin S. Bromfield and Alfred L. Bush, 1968, pp. 94-99 in: San Juan, San Miguel, La Plata Region (New Mexico and Colorado), Shomaker, J. W.; [ed.], New Mexico Geological Society 19th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 212 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1968 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Telluride Quadrangle
    DESCRIPTION OF THE TELLURIDE QUADRANGLE. INTRODUCTION. along the southern base, and agricultural lands water Jura of other parts of Colorado, and follow­ vents from which the lavas came are unknown, A general statement of the geography, topography, have been found in valley bottoms or on lower ing them comes the Cretaceous section, from the and the lavas themselves have been examined slopes adjacent to the snow-fed streams Economic Dakota to the uppermost coal-bearing member, the only in sufficient degree to show the predominant and geology of the San Juan region of from the mountains. With the devel- imp°rtance- Colorado. Laramie. Below Durango the post-Laramie forma­ presence of andesites, with other types ranging opment of these resources several towns of tion, made up of eruptive rock debris and known in composition from rhyolite to basalt. Pene­ The term San Juan region, or simply " the San importance have been established in sheltered as the "Animas beds," rests upon the Laramie, trating the bedded series are several massive Juan," used with variable meaning by early valleys on all sides. Railroads encircle the group and is in turn overlain by the Puerco and higher bodies of often coarsely granular rocks, such as explorers, and naturally with indefinite and penetrate to some of the mining centers of Eocene deposits. gabbro and diorite, and it now seems probable limitation during the period of settle- sa^juan the the interior. Creede, Silverton, Telluride, Ouray, Structurally, the most striking feature in the that the intrusive bodies of diorite-porphyry and ment, is. now quite.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • The Proposed Montezuma Forest Reserve Colorado
    THE PROPOSED MONTEZUMA FOREST RESERVE COLORADO ---- Examination, Report and Recommendations by Coert DuBois ---- Bureau of Forestry U. S. Department of Agriculture 1904 A facsimile of a copy acquired from the National Archives and Records Administration, Rocky Mountain Regional Office at Denver Federal Center December 2007 by David Bradford. 2 THE PROPOSED MONTEZUMA FOREST RESERVE, COLORADO ---- By Coert DuBois Forest Assistant, Forest Service ---- Location and Area The area included within the proposed Montezuma Forest Reserve lies in parts of San Miguel, Dolores, San Juan, La Plata, and Montezuma Counties in southwest Colorado, and includes the La Plata, Bear River, and San Miguel mountain ranges. The proposed boundaries include a total acreage of 570,260. Topography The mountains divide the area into three watersheds. On the north slope of the San Miguel Range are the headwaters of several small creeks which flow into the San Miguel River. The east slopes of the Bear River and La Plata Mountains are drained by Cascade, Hermosa, and Junction Creeks, all tributaries of the Animas River. The most important division is the drainage basin of the Mancos and Dolores Rivers, or the south and west slopes of the mountains. The heads of the Mancos River rise high up in the La Plata Mountains and consist of three forks fed by many smaller creeks, which join and form the main Mancos near the south boundary. A low mesa divides the waters of the Mancos from those of the Dolores. The Dolores River, the most important in the southwest part of the State, with the exception of the San Juan, has its sources in all three ranges, being fed by a great many mountain streams, the chief of which are the West Fork, Bear Creek, Beaver Creek, and Lost Canon Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Topographic Maps, Scale 1:24,000 This List Contains The
    Colorado Topographic Maps, scale 1:24,000 This list contains the quadrangle names and publication dates of all Colorado topographic maps published at the scale of 1:24,000 by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). One, non-circulating copy of each map is held in the Map Room Office. The Library does not own maps labeled "lacking." The maps are sorted alphabetically by sheet name. Colorado 1:24,000 Topos -- A Abarr 1974 printed 1977 Abarr SE 1968 printed 1971 1968 (without color) printed 1971 Abeyta 1971 printed 1974 1971 (without color) printed 1974 Adams Lake 1974 printed 1978 (dark), 1978 (light) 1974 (without color) printed 1978 1987 printed 1988 Adena 1963 printed 1965, 1975 1963 (without color) printed 1965 1984 printed 1984 1984 (without color) printed 1984 Adler Creek 1968 printed 1971 1968 (without color) printed 1971 Adobe Downs Ranch, New Mexico-Colorado 1963 printed 1965 1963 (without color) printed 1965 1979 printed 1980 (dark), 1980 (light) Adobe Springs 1969 printed 1972, 1992 1969 (without color) printed 1972 Agate 1970 printed 1973 (dark), 1973 (light) 1970 (without color) printed 1973 Agate Mountain 1983 printed 1983 1994 printed 1998 Aguilar 1971 printed 1974 1971 (without color) printed 1974 Akron 1973 printed 1976 1973 (without color) printed 1976 Akron SE 1973 printed 1976 Akron SW 1973 printed 1976 Alamosa East 1966 printed 1968, 1975 1966 (without color) printed 1968 Alamosa West 1966 printed 1969, 1971 1966 (without color) printed 1969 Aldrich Gulch 1957 printed 1958, 1964, 1975 (dark), 1975 (light) 1957 (without color)
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Jennings' Key to Phlox
    KEY TO PHLOX OF COLORADO PREPARED BY BILL JENNINGS APRIL 29, 1999 The similarity of Phlox flowers from species to species does not offer much upon which to construct a key, except plant stature and habitat, the tack taken in most floras. However, taken together, the dimensions of the plant, leaves, and flowers; characteristics of the calyx; pubescence; habitat; blooming season; and elevation seem to separate the species of Phlox. Considering the similarity of the flowers, most species of Phlox are probably pollinated by the same or similar pollinators. It is probable that only by temporal, ecological, and elevational differences do the taxa maintain their distinctiveness as species. Where species share the same range and habitat, one should expect difficulty in separating species of Phlox. 1. Plants east of Continental Divide...2 1. Plants west of Continental Divide...11 2. Plants of the eastern plains (generally east of I-25)...3 2. Plants of the foothills, mountains, and tundra...6 3. cushionlike, densely caespitose plants, less than about 5 cm tall; leaves densely woolly, closely overlapping, scale-like, less than 5 mm long; flowers white to bluish, tube 5-10 mm, lobes 3-5 mm, style 2-5 mm; blooming mid-May to mid-June, peaking June 9; often in cracks in rock outcrops or on rocky sites, usually on calcareous substrates, in Logan, Weld, and Larimer Counties within about 30 miles of the Wyoming state line...Phlox muscoides (Phlox bryoides) (This can be difficult to distinguish from somewhat caespitose plants of Phlox hoodii, but Phlox muscoides is copiously woolly pubescent, is usually restricted to very rocky sites, and blooms later; see lead 5B for more characteristics of Phlox hoodii).
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle's View of San Juan Mountains
    Eagle’s View of San Juan Mountains Aerial Photographs with Mountain Descriptions of the most attractive places of Colorado’s San Juan Mountains Wojtek Rychlik Ⓒ 2014 Wojtek Rychlik, Pikes Peak Photo Published by Mother's House Publishing 6180 Lehman, Suite 104 Colorado Springs CO 80918 719-266-0437 / 800-266-0999 [email protected] www.mothershousepublishing.com ISBN 978-1-61888-085-7 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced without permission in writing from the copyright owner. Printed by Mother’s House Publishing, Colorado Springs, CO, U.S.A. Wojtek Rychlik www.PikesPeakPhoto.com Title page photo: Lizard Head and Sunshine Mountain southwest of Telluride. Front cover photo: Mount Sneffels and Yankee Boy Basin viewed from west. Acknowledgement 1. Aerial photography was made possible thanks to the courtesy of Jack Wojdyla, owner and pilot of Cessna 182S airplane. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Section NE: The Northeast, La Garita Mountains and Mountains East of Hwy 149 5 San Luis Peak 13 3. Section N: North San Juan Mountains; Northeast of Silverton & West of Lake City 21 Uncompahgre & Wetterhorn Peaks 24 Redcloud & Sunshine Peaks 35 Handies Peak 41 4. Section NW: The Northwest, Mount Sneffels and Lizard Head Wildernesses 59 Mount Sneffels 69 Wilson & El Diente Peaks, Mount Wilson 75 5. Section SW: The Southwest, Mountains West of Animas River and South of Ophir 93 6. Section S: South San Juan Mountains, between Animas and Piedra Rivers 108 Mount Eolus & North Eolus 126 Windom, Sunlight Peaks & Sunlight Spire 137 7. Section SE: The Southeast, Mountains East of Trout Creek and South of Rio Grande 165 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Ttu Gs0001 000144.Pdf (9.792Mb)
    NOT FOR CIRCULATION Elevations and Distances in the United States The information in this booklet was compiled to answer inquiries received by the U.S. Geological Survey from students; teachers; writers; editors; pub­ lishers of encyclopedias, almanacs, and other reference books; and people in many other fields of work. The elevations of features and distances between points in the United States were determined from surveys and topographic maps of the U.S. Geological Survey or obtained from other sources. In most cases, the elevations were determined from surveys and from 1:24,000- and 1 :25,000-scale, 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle maps. In Alaska, infor­ mation was taken from 1:63,360-scale, 15-minute topographic quadrangle maps. In a few cases, data were obtained from older, 1:62,500-scale, 15-minute maps; these maps are being replaced with larger-scale 7.5-minute coverage. Further information about U.S. Geological Survey products can be obtained from: U.S. Geological Survey, Earth Science In­ formation Center, 507 National Center! Reston, VA 22092 or phone 703-860-6045. 3 Elevations of the 50 Largest Cities (by population, 1980 Census) City State Rank High Low feet feet New York New York 410 Sea Level 1 Chicago Illinois 2 673 579 Los Angeles California 3 5,074 Sea Level Philadelphia Pennsylvania 4 441 Sea Level Houston Texas 5 83 Sea Level Detroit Michigan 6 672 1575 Dallas Texas 7 686 390 San Diego California 8 823 Sea Level Phoenix Arizona 9 1,160 1,058 Baltimore Maryland 10 489 Sea Level San Antonio Texas 11 1,000 505 Indianapolis Indiana 12 845 664 San Francisco California 13 934 Sea Level Memphis Tennessee 14 335 195 Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of COLORADO COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD Department of Natural Resources
    STATE OF COLORADO COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD Department of Natural Resources . 823 State Centennial Building ' 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone: (303 ) 866-3441 M E M O R A N D U M Richard D. Lamm •Governor J. William McDonald Director TO: Notification List - Files David W. Walker Deputy Director FROM: Eugene I. Jencsok, P.E., Section Chief Hydrologic Investigation Section DATE: June 14, 1984 SUBJECT: Final Notice - Instream Flow/Natural Lake Level Recommendations, Division 7, to be Presented at the July 13, 1984, Board Meeting Please find attached the Final Notice ot instream flow/ natural lake level recommendations on which the Colorado Water Conservation Board will take action at its next regular meeting in Denver, Colorado, on July 13, 1984. This Final Notice constitutes the start of the final 30-day public review and comment period before the Board will be asked to take formal action on these recommendations. Should you wish to comment on the instream flow/natural lake level recommendations as presented in this Final Notice, you may do so by writing the staff at the address given above. It should be noted that while your public appearance at the Boarn meeting is welcomed, such an appearance is not necessary in orner for your concerns to be recognized. The staff will take your comments into account and, if you so request, present them to the Board in your absence. To insure adequate notification of all interested parties, we are requesting that you share this notice with any groups or individuals who you feel would have an interest in the instream flow/natural lake level recommendations as presented herein.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME Elevations and Distances in the United
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 241 333 SE 044 120 TITLE Elevations and Distances in the United States. INSTITUTION Geological Survey (Dept. of Interior), Reston, Va. PUB DATE 80 NOTE 13p.; Photographs may not reproduce well. PUB TYPE Reference Materials - Geographic Materials (133) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Charts; *Distance; Earth Science; *Geographic Location; Geography; *Height; Instructional Materials; Physical Divisions (Geographic); *Physical Geography; *Proximity; Secondary Education; Tables (Data); Topography; Urban Areas IDENTIFIERS PF Project; Rocky Mountains; *United States ABSTRACT One of a series of general interest publications on science topics, the booklet proviees those interested in elevations and distances with a nontechnical introduction to the subject. The entire document consists of statistical charts depicting the nation's 50 largest cities, extreme and mean elevations, elevations of named summits over 14,000 feet above sea level, elevations of selected summits east of the Rocky Mountains, distances from extreme points to geographic centers, and lengths of United States boundaries. The elevations of features and distances between pbints in the United States were determined from surveys and topographic maps of the U.S. Geological Survey. (LH) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** . r Mee Notion's principal conservation agency, the Department AIthe *hider hoe responsibility for most of our nationally owned -MOM lends sad n,.twal ammo. This includes fostering the Elevations 'MN* Use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and ilitillie,:ermervinj the emoironmentsi and cultural values of our and Distances Malone parks sad.historlcM places, and providing for the enjoy- s _meat of life tha.: oh outdoor recrecion.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resource Potential of National Forest RARE II and Wilderness Areas in Colorado
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resource potential of National Forest RARE II and wilderness areas in Colorado Compiled By Robert P. Dickerson 1 Open-File Report 86-0364 1986 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Denver, Colorado CONTENTS (See also indices listings, p. 173) Page Introduction..................................................... 1 Grand Mesa, Gunnison, and Uncompahgre National Forests........... 2 Elk Mountains-Collegiate (2-180)............................ 2 Collegiate Peaks Wilderness (NF-180)........................ 2 Elk Mountains-Collegiate (2-180)............................ 5 Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness (NF-047)................... 5 Oh-Be-Joyful (2-181)........................................ 6 Ragged Mountain Wilderness (NF-181)......................... 7 Raggeds (2-181)............................................. 7 Drift Creek (2-182).......................................... 9 Perham Creek (2-183)........................................ 9 Springhouse Park (2-184).................................... 10 Electric Mountain (2-185)................................... 10 Clear Creek (2-186)......................................... 11 Hightower (2-189)........................................... 12 Priest Mountain (2-191)..................................... 12 Salt Creek (2-192).......................................... 12 Battlement Mesa (2-193)....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Engineer Mountain Quadrangle
    DESCRIPTION OF THE ENGINEER MOUNTAIN QUADRANGLE. By Whitman Cross. INTRODUCTION. On account of the various relations of the Engineer Moun­ than anywhere else. In the nearest exposures in the Telluride tain quadrangle to the surrounding country it is advisable to quadrangle the elevation of the base varies from 12,500 to POSITION AJXD EXTENT OF THE QUADRANGLE. precede the detailed description of the area with an outline nearly 13,000 feet. It descends to about the level of 11,000 The Engineer Mountain quadrangle is in southwestern of the ogeology o*/ of the San Juan district. feet on the north and northeast, near Telluride and Silverton, Colorado, about 60 miles east of the Utah boundary and 34 respectively. This northeasterly dip of the base of the San miles north of New Mexico. It lies between the Needle GEOLOGY OF THE SAN JUAN REGION IN RELATION TO THAT OF Juan tuff is probably due to changes of level since its Mountains on the east and the Rico Mountains on the west THE ENGINEER MOUNTAIN QUADRANGLE, deposition. and includes some of the outer summits of each group. The geological history of the mountainous portion of south­ The intrusive igneous rocks of the San Juan Mountains are Immediately adjacent on the north is the very rugged western western Colorado is very complex. From pre-Cambrian to represented in the Engineer Mountain quadrangle by a small arm of the San Juan Mountains. The quadrangle is included late Tertiary time this region has been the scene of recurring portion of a large monzonite stock in which the canyon of between meridians 107° 45' and 108° and parallels 37° 30' earth disturbances of various kinds.
    [Show full text]