IOBC/WPRS Bulletins
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Protocol for Online Documentation of Spider Biodiversity Inventories Applied to a Mexican Tropical Wet Forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae)
Zootaxa 4722 (3): 241–269 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4722.3.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6AC6E70B-6E6A-4D46-9C8A-2260B929E471 A protocol for online documentation of spider biodiversity inventories applied to a Mexican tropical wet forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae) FERNANDO ÁLVAREZ-PADILLA1, 2, M. ANTONIO GALÁN-SÁNCHEZ1 & F. JAVIER SALGUEIRO- SEPÚLVEDA1 1Laboratorio de Aracnología, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Biología Comparada, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n, Colonia Copilco el Bajo. C. P. 04510. Del. Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México. E-mail: [email protected] 2Corresponding author Abstract Spider community inventories have relatively well-established standardized collecting protocols. Such protocols set rules for the orderly acquisition of samples to estimate community parameters and to establish comparisons between areas. These methods have been tested worldwide, providing useful data for inventory planning and optimal sampling allocation efforts. The taxonomic counterpart of biodiversity inventories has received considerably less attention. Species lists and their relative abundances are the only link between the community parameters resulting from a biotic inventory and the biology of the species that live there. However, this connection is lost or speculative at best for species only partially identified (e. g., to genus but not to species). This link is particularly important for diverse tropical regions were many taxa are undescribed or little known such as spiders. One approach to this problem has been the development of biodiversity inventory websites that document the morphology of the species with digital images organized as standard views. -
Life-History Constraints in Inaccurate Batesian Myrmecomorphic Spiders (Araneae: Corinnidae, Gnaphosidae)
Eur. J. Entomol. 108: 255–260, 2011 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1614 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Life-history constraints in inaccurate Batesian myrmecomorphic spiders (Araneae: Corinnidae, Gnaphosidae) STANO PEKÁR and MARTIN JARAB Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlá Ĝská 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Formicidae, prey, trophic niche, clutch size, copulation, courtship Abstract. Accurate Batesian mimicry is known to impose constraints on some traits of the mimic, such as foraging or reproductive behaviour. It is not known whether life-history traits of inaccurate Batesian mimics are constrained as well. We studied selected life- history traits of three spider species, Liophrurillus flavitarsis, Phrurolithus festivus (both Corinnidae), and Micaria sociabilis (Gna- phosidae), that are inaccurate mimics of ants. Namely, we were interested in how myrmecomorphy (ant-like resemblance) constrains their circadian activity, trophic niche and reproductive behaviour. The spiders were found to have diurnal activity like their models, whereas their close relatives have nocturnal activity. The three mimics do not catch ants, nor do they use food resources of ants, but catch various tiny invertebrates that occur in the vicinity of their models. Their trophic niche seems to be constrained by occurrence among ants. Absence of courtship and long lasting copulation, in a position that does not provide protective resemblance, do not seem to be constrained by mimicry in the three species. Comparative analysis of fecundity in mimetic and non-mimetic spiders showed that clutch size is also not constrained. Unlike in accurate mimics, life-history traits of inaccurate myrmecomorphs appear not to be constrained. -
Araneae, Corinnidae, Castianeirinae), a New Polymorphic Ground Sac Spider from the Southern Western Ghats of India
Zootaxa 3964 (5): 569–576 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3964.5.7 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BFB58A5F-8D45-4A38-B16A-B9FB1E80ABE6 Castianeira furva sp. nov. (Araneae, Corinnidae, Castianeirinae), a new polymorphic ground sac spider from the southern Western Ghats of India PRADEEP M. SANKARAN1, JOBI J. MALAMEL, MATHEW M. JOSEPH & POTHALIL A. SEBASTIAN Division of Arachnology, Department of Zoology, Sacred Heart College, Thevara, Cochin, Kerala 682 013, India 1Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Introduction The ground-dwelling, ant-mimicking corinnid spider genus Castianeira, with Castianeira rubicunda as type species, was erected by Keyserling (1879). Members of the genus are closely related to the Afrotropical genus Cambalida Simon, 1910 (Haddad 2012a) and are distributed mainly in tropical and temperate regions of the world except for Australia and nearby islands (World Spider Catalog 2015). The genus was revised from the Nearctic Region and south-east Asia (Reiskind 1969 and Deeleman-Reinhold 2001, respectively) and currently includes 126 described species, making it as the largest genus within the family Corinnidae (World Spider Catalog 2015). Even though the genus is rich in species, the validity and placement of majority of the species are still doubtful and questionable. For example, according to Haddad (2012b), many of the Afrotropical species, as well as majority of the species described from India (Haddad, pers. comm.) are misplaced or synonyms of previously described ones (e.g. Haddad 2012a, 2013a). The genus thus will remain as a trash-can until all the species described so far can be revised. -
Spiders 27 November-5 December 2018 Submitted: August 2019 Robert Raven
Bush Blitz – Namadgi, ACT 27 Nov-5 Dec 2018 Namadgi, ACT Bush Blitz Spiders 27 November-5 December 2018 Submitted: August 2019 Robert Raven Nomenclature and taxonomy used in this report is consistent with: The Australian Faunal Directory (AFD) http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/fauna/afd/home Page 1 of 12 Bush Blitz – Namadgi, ACT 27 Nov-5 Dec 2018 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................. 2 List of contributors ................................................................................................................... 2 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methods .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Site selection ............................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Survey techniques ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Methods used at standard survey sites ................................................................... 5 2.3 Identifying the collections ......................................................................................... -
Spiders of Alberta: from Agelenidae to Uloboridae
Spiders of Alberta: from Agelenidae to Uloboridae Dr. Heather Proctor University of Alberta for the Edmonton Nature Club, 7 Feb 2019 (selected slides for posting; photos (c) H. Proctor unless otherwise noted) Canadian and Albertan diversity • 1477 species of spiders in 45 families known from Canada – may be up to 1800 spp. • 657 species in 28 families known from Alberta 631 of the 657 species are included here from https://www.albertaparks.ca/media/6255191/list-of-elements-ab-invertebrates-spiders.xlsx The 28 families of spiders known from Alberta • no mygalomorph spiders in AB, only araneomorph • Division Synspermiata – Pholcioidea: Pholcidae, Telemidae • Division Entelegynae – Araneoidea: Theridiidae, Araneidae, Linyphiidae, Mysmenidae, Mimetidae, Tetragnathidae – Uloboroidea: Uloboridae – Titanoecoidea: Titanoecidae – Amaurobioidea: Amaurobiidae – Desoidea: Desidae – Agelenoidea: Dictynidae, Cybaeidae, Hahniidae, Agelenidae – Lycosoidea: Oxyopidae, Thomisidae, Pisauridae, Lycosidae – Salticoidea: Salticidae, Philodromidae, Corinnidae, Eutichuridae – Anyphaenoidea: Anyphaenidae, Clubionidae – Liocranoidea: Liocranidae – Trochanteroidea: Phrurolithidae, Gnaphosidae mygalomorphs from BC, Antrodiaetus sp. Linyphiidae 261 Gnaphosidae 51 Lycosidae 50 Salticidae 45 Number of species known Dictynidae 36 from each family in Alberta Thomisidae 37 Theridiidae 36 (based on Robb Bennett’s Araneidae 32 personal list, 7 Feb 2019) Philodromidae 29 Clubionidae 17 Tetragnathidae 14 Hahniidae 10 Amaurobiidae 7 Agelenidae 6 Corinnidae 3 Phrurolithidae -
Ecography Drapela, T., Moser, D., Zaller, J
E5250 Ecography Drapela, T., Moser, D., Zaller, J. G. and Frank, T. 2008. Spider assemblages in winter oilseed rape affected by landscape and site factors. – Ecography 31: 254–262. Appendix. List of spider species from 29 winter oilseed rape fields in eastern Austria. Activity density (number of individuals), dominance (%), number of fields where species were found, and records of ballooning behaviour. Family Species1 Activity Dominance (%) Number Ballooning2 density of fields Agelenidae Tegenaria campestris C.L. Koch, 1834 3 0.03 3 Amaurobiidae Urocoras longispinus (Kulczynski, 1897) 3 0.03 3 Araneidae Hypsosinga pygmaea (Sundevall, 1831) 1 0.01 1 + Clubionidae Clubiona terrestris Westring, 1851 2 0.02 2 Corinnidae Phrurolithus festivus (C.L. Koch, 1835) 28 0.25 10 Dictynidae Argenna patula (Simon, 1874) 4 0.04 4 Argenna subnigra (O. P.-Cambridge, 1861) 138 1.24 26 + Dysderidae Dysdera erythrina (Walckenaer, 1802) 1 0.01 1 Dysdera hungarica Kulczynski, 1897 1 0.01 1 Harpactea rubicunda (C.L. Koch, 1838) 1 0.01 1 Gnaphosidae Drassodes lapidosus (Walckenaer, 1802) 7 0.06 4 Drassodes pubescens (Thorell, 1856) 8 0.07 7 Drassyllus lutetianus (L. Koch, 1866) 23 0.21 17 Drassyllus praeficus (L. Koch, 1866) 45 0.40 19 Drassyllus pumilus (C.L. Koch, 1839) 3 0.03 2 Drassyllus pusillus (C.L. Koch, 1833) 223 2.00 29 Drassyllus villicus (Thorell, 1875) 23 0.21 13 Gnaphosa lucifuga (Walckenaer, 1802) 2 0.02 2 Haplodrassus dalmatensis (L. Koch, 1866) 34 0.30 18 Haplodrassus minor (O. P.-Cambridge, 1879) 3 0.03 2 Haplodrassus signifer (C.L. Koch, 1839) 92 0.82 26 Micaria pulicaria (Sundevall, 1831) 16 0.14 8 Trachyzelotes pedestris (C.L. -
Common Spiders of the Chicago Region 1 the Field Museum – Division of Environment, Culture, and Conservation
An Introduction to the Spiders of Chicago Wilderness, USA Common Spiders of the Chicago Region 1 The Field Museum – Division of Environment, Culture, and Conservation Produced by: Jane and John Balaban, North Branch Restoration Project; Rebecca Schillo, Conservation Ecologist, The Field Museum; Lynette Schimming, BugGuide.net. © ECCo, The Field Museum, Chicago, IL 60605 USA [http://fieldmuseum.org/IDtools] [[email protected]] version 2, 2/2012 Images © Tom Murray, Lynette Schimming, Jane and John Balaban, and others – Under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License (non-native species listed in red) ARANEIDAE ORB WEAVERS Orb Weavers and Long-Jawed Orb Weavers make classic orb webs made famous by the book Charlotte’s Web. You can sometimes tell a spider by its eyes, most have eight. This chart shows the orb weaver eye arrangement (see pg 6 for more info) 1 ARANEIDAE 2 Argiope aurantia 3 Argiope trifasciata 4 Araneus marmoreus Orb Weaver Spider Web Black and Yellow Argiope Banded Argiope Marbled Orbweaver ORB WEAVERS are classic spiders of gardens, grasslands, and woodlands. The Argiope shown here are the large grassland spiders of late summer and fall. Most Orb Weavers mature in late summer and look slightly different as juveniles. Pattern and coloring can vary in some species such as Araneus marmoreus. See the link for photos of its color patterns: 5 Araneus thaddeus 6 Araneus cingulatus 7 Araneus diadematus 8 Araneus trifolium http://bugguide.net/node/view/2016 Lattice Orbweaver Cross Orbweaver Shamrock Orbweaver 9 Metepeira labyrinthea 10 Neoscona arabesca 11 Larinioides cornutus 12 Araniella displicata 13 Verrucosa arenata Labyrinth Orbweaver Arabesque Orbweaver Furrow Orbweaver Sixspotted Orbweaver Arrowhead Spider TETRAGNATHIDAE LONG-JAWED ORB WEAVERS Leucauge is a common colorful spider of our gardens and woodlands, often found hanging under its almost horizontal web. -
Phylogeny and Classification of Spiders
18 FROM: Ubick, D., P. Paquin, P.E. Cushing, andV. Roth (eds). 2005. Spiders of North America: an identification manual. American Arachnological Society. 377 pages. Chapter 2 PHYLOGENY AND CLASSIFICATION OF SPIDERS Jonathan A. Coddington ARACHNIDA eyes, jumping spiders also share many other anatomical, Spiders are one of the eleven orders of the class Arach- behavioral, ecological, and physiological features. Most nida, which also includes groups such as harvestmen (Opil- important for the field arachnologist they all jump, a useful iones), ticks and mites (Acari), scorpions (Scorpiones), false bit of knowledge if you are trying to catch one. Taxonomic scorpions (Pseudoscorpiones), windscorpions (Solifugae), prediction works in reverse as well: that spider bouncing and vinegaroons (Uropygi). All arachnid orders occur in about erratically in the bushes is almost surely a salticid. North America. Arachnida today comprises approximately Another reason that scientists choose to base classifica- 640 families, 9000 genera, and 93,000 described species, but tion on phylogeny is that evolutionary history (like all his- the current estimate is that untold hundreds of thousands tory) is unique: strictly speaking, it only happened once. of new mites, substantially fewer spiders, and several thou- That means there is only one true reconstruction of evolu- sand species in the remaining orders, are still undescribed tionary history and one true phylogeny: the existing clas- (Adis & Harvey 2000, reviewed in Coddington & Colwell sification is either correct, or it is not. In practice it can be 2001, Coddington et ol. 2004). Acari (ticks and mites) are complicated to reconstruct the true phylogeny of spiders by far the most diverse, Araneae (spiders) second, and the and to know whether any given reconstruction (or classifi- remaining taxa orders of magnitude less diverse. -
A New Species of Hortipes (Araneae, Corinnidae), the First Spider with an Insertable Retrolateral Tibial Apophysis on the Male Palp
European Journal of Taxonomy 26: 1-11 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2012.26 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2012 · Jocqué R., Bosselaers J. & Henrard A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BB26F2C9-AC4E-4941-9A34-7CDC5ECFB63F A new species of Hortipes (Araneae, Corinnidae), the first spider with an insertable retrolateral tibial apophysis on the male palp Rudy JOCQUÉ1, Jan BOSSELAERS2 and Arnaud HENRARD3 1,2,3Royal Museum for Central Africa, B 3080 Tervuren, Belgium. Email: [email protected] 3Earth and life Institute, Biodiversity research Center, UCL-17.07.04, Bâtiment Carnoy, Croix du Sud, 5, B 1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. 1urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:CF15016C-8CD1-4C9D-9021-44CA7DC7A5D5 2urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:D6AD7414-3540-4F06-8631-8873450AA90C 3urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:E1B02E6E-D91C-43FE-8D8C-CD102EFEE3B4 Abstract. Hortipes gigapophysalis (Araneae, Corinnidae) is a new species described from both sexes from montane forest on Mt Nimba, eastern Guinea. The species is remarkable for its long, whip-shaped retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA) on the male palp. The structure apparently has an insertable function as the epigyne of the female contains a separate set of ducts starting from a central concavity that is unique in the genus. This duct system is apparently meant to receive the supple RTA. This type of structural arrangement has never previously been found in spiders. Keywords. genitalia, morphology, Corinnidae, Guinea, Mt Nimba. Jocqué R., Bosselaers J. & Henrard A. 2012. A new species of Hortipes (Araneae, Corinnidae), the first spider with an insertable retrolateral tibial apophysis on the male palp. -
A Checklist of Maine Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae)
A CHECKLIST OF MAINE SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) By Daniel T. Jennings Charlene P. Donahue Forest Health and Monitoring Maine Forest Service Technical Report No. 47 MAINE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, CONSERVATION AND FORESTRY September 2020 Augusta, Maine Online version of this report available from: https://www.maine.gov/dacf/mfs/publications/fhm_pubs.htm Requests for copies should be made to: Maine Forest Service Division of Forest Health & Monitoring 168 State House Station Augusta, Maine 04333-0168 Phone: (207) 287-2431 Printed under appropriation number: 013-01A-2FHM-52 Issued 09/2020 Initial printing of 25 This product was made possible in part by funding from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Forest health programs in the Maine Forest Service, Department of Agriculture Conservation and Forestry are supported and conducted in partnership with the USDA, the University of Maine, cooperating landowners, resource managers, and citizen volunteers. This institution is prohibited from discrimination based on race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. 2 A CHECKLIST OF MAINE SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) 1 2 DANIEL T. JENNINGS and CHARLENE P. DONAHUE ____________________________________ 1 Daniel T. Jennings, retired, USDA, Forest Service, Northern Forest Experiment Station. Passed away September 14, 2020 2 Charlene P. Donahue, retired, Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry – Maine Forest Service. Corresponding Author [email protected] 4 Table of Contents Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Figure 1. Map of State of Maine -
Araneae: Trachelidae) from an Oak Forest Inside the Mesoamerican Biodiversity Hotspot in Mexico
Zootaxa 3999 (1): 095–110 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3999.1.6 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:98C60CDD-82AD-4A36-903F-C25633968508 Three new species of the genus Trachelas (Araneae: Trachelidae) from an oak forest inside the Mesoamerican biodiversity hotspot in Mexico F. ANDRÉS RIVERA-QUIROZ1 & FERNANDO ALVAREZ-PADILLA1,2,3 1Laboratorio de Aracnología, Departamento de Biología Comparada, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Distrito Federal, México Ciudad Universitaria, México D. F. Del. Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, México. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Research Associate, Department of Entomology, California Academy of Sciencies.55 Music Concourse Dr, San Francisco, CA 94118, United States. E-mail: [email protected] 3Corresponding author Abstract Three new species of the spider genus Trachelas L. Koch, 1872 are described and included in the speciosus group based on the following features: embolus as a separate sclerite from the tegulum with no basal coils, legs with a conspicuous fringe of long trichobothria and narrow copulatory ducts coiled irregularly. The new species described are: T. crassus sp. n., T. ductonuda sp. n. and T. odoreus sp. n. A total of 46 specimens were collected in an oak forest near Pico de Orizaba Volcano, Mexico. Most individuals were collected on low vegetation using beating trays and direct collecting at night. Additional images are available at www.unamfcaracnolab.com. Key words: Cybertaxonomy, Neotropical, Mexico, RTA clade Introduction The family Trachelidae currently includes 202 species with a cosmopolitan distribution except in Australia (WSC 2015). -
The Evolution of Jumping Spiders (Araneae: Salticidae): a Review
Peckhamia 75.1 Evolution of jumping spiders 1 PECKHAMIA 75.1, 17 August 2009, 1―7 ISSN 1944―8120 The evolution of jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae): a review David E. Hill1 and David B. Richman2 1 213 Wild Horse Creek Drive, Simpsonville, South Carolina 29680 2 Corresponding author: [email protected] Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003 The following article was written as part of the yearlong celebration of the 200th birthday of Charles Darwin and the 150th Anniversary of the publication of his Origin of Species. Abstract The evolution of the family Salticidae (jumping spiders) has always puzzled arachnologists, but with modern DNA and morphological analysis, using cladistic techniques, a pattern is starting to emerge. The Salticidae apparently originated in the late Cretaceous and were derived from one of the other RTA dionychan clades, which include Philodromidae, Thomisidae, Miturgidae, Anyphaenidae, Gnaphosidae and related groups. Speciation appears to have been well along by the Oligocene―Miocene and may have been spurred on by the warm conditions of the late Paleocene―Eocene. At this point it seems wise to gather the current evidence and thinking on the origin and evolution of jumping spiders and the more “typical” Salticoida together and to give an overview of where the research currently stands. This is the main purpose of the current review. Introduction With more than 5,000 described species (Platnick 2009), the jumping spiders (Salticidae) arguably represent the most diverse family of modern spiders. Although we do not have any scientific standards for comparison of evolutionary diversity, those familiar with salticids might consider the group to be at least as diverse as the birds (Class Aves), and perhaps just as ancient in their origin.