DOCSLIB.ORG

General John Gibbon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
General John Gibbon General John Gibbon As Portrayed By Joshua Ours John Gibbon was born on April 20, 1827 in Philadelphia, PA, to Dr. and Corps, while having to command larger units. At the end of the council Mrs. John H. Gibbon. The family moved to Charlotte, NC in 1838 after of war on the night of July 2nd, army commander Maj. Gen. George G. his father was appointed as chief assayer of the U.S. Mint. John Meade took Gibbon aside and predicted, "If Lee attacks tomorrow, it will graduated from West Point in 1847 and was commissioned as a 2nd Lt. in be on your front." And his division did bear the brunt of fighting during 3rd US Artillery. Gibbon served in the Mexican-American the defense against Pickett's Charge on July 3rd, when War without seeing combat, attempted to keep the peace Gibbon was again wounded. While recovering from his between Seminoles and settlers in south Florida, and wounds, Gibbon commanded a draft depot in Cleveland, taught artillery tactics at West Point, where he wrote The Ohio, and attended the dedication of Soldiers' National Artillerist's Manual in 1859. Cemetery and heard Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address. Gibbon was back in command of the 2nd Division In 1854, Gibbon served as an assistant artillery instructor at the battles of the Wilderness, North Anna, Totopotomoy, at West Point, and in 1855, he married Frances North Spotsylvania Court House, and Cold Harbor. During the Moale. Following the firing on Fort Sumter, Gibbon was Siege of Petersburg, Gibbon became disheartened when his appointed Chief of Artillery for Irvin McDowell. Despite troops refused to fight at Ream's Station. the fact that his father was a slaveholder and that three of his brothers, two brothers-in-law and his cousin J. Gibbon briefly commanded the XVIII Corps before going Johnston Pettigrew served in the Confederate military, on sick leave. However, his service being too valuable, Gibbon decided to uphold his oath to the Union. Gibbon returned in 1865 to command the newly created XXIV Corps in the Army of the James. His troops helped In 1862, Gibbon was promoted to Brigadier General and achieve the decisive breakthrough at Petersburg, capturing placed in charge of 4 regiments, the 2nd, 6th, and 7th Fort Gregg, part of the Confederate defenses. He led his Wisconsin Volunteer Infantry and the 19th Indiana troops during the Appomattox Campaign and blocked the Volunteer Infantry, which later became known as the 'Iron Confederate escape route at the Battle of Appomattox Brigade.' Courthouse. Gibbon was one of three commissioners General Gibbon’s Iron Brigade fought in several selected by General Ulysses S. Grant for the surrender of the engagements, including Brawner Farm, Second Manassas, R.E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia. and Antietam. In November, 1862, Gibbon was placed in In 1864, Col. Lyman said of General Gibbon, "Thither came command of the 2nd Division, I Corps of the Army of the steel-cold General Gibbon, the most American of Potomac, requiring him to leave the Iron Brigade. At the Battle of Americans, with his sharp nose and up-and-down manner of telling the Fredericksburg, Gibbon was wounded leaving him with a crippled left truth, no matter whom it hurts.” hand. In 1863, Gibbon was placed in command of the 2nd Division, II Corps of General Gibbon is portrayed by Joshua Ours, who resides in Petersburg, the Army of the Potomac, leading his division at Chancellorsville. At WV. Gettysburg, Winfield S. Hancock placed Gibbon in command of the II .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CUSTER BATTLEFIELD National Monument Montana (Now Little Bighorn Battlefield)
    CUSTER BATTLEFIELD National Monument Montana (now Little Bighorn Battlefield) by Robert M. Utley National Park Service Historical Handbook Series No. 1 Washington, D.C. 1969 Contents a. A CUSTER PROFILE b. CUSTER'S LAST STAND 1. Campaign of 1876 2. Indian Movements 3. Plan of Action 4. March to the Little Bighorn 5. Reno Attacks 6. The Annihilation of Custer 7. Reno Besieged 8. Rescue 9. Collapse of the Sioux 10. Custer Battlefield Today 11. Campaign Maps c. APPENDIXES I. Officers of the 7th Cavalry at the Battle of the Little Bighorn II. Low Dog's Account of the Battle III. Gall's Account of the Battle IV. A Participant's Account of Major Reno's Battle d. CUSTER'S LAST CAMPAIGN: A PHOTOGRAPHIC ESSAY e. THE ART AND THE ARTIST f. ADMINISTRATION For additional information, visit the Web site for Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument or view their Official National Park Handbook (#132): Historical Handbook Number One 1969 The publication of this handbook was made possible by a grant from the Custer Battlefield Historical and Museum Association, Inc. This publication is one of a series of handbooks describing the historical and archeological areas in the National Park System administered by the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. Price lists of Park Service publications sold by the Government Printing Office may be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C. 20402. The National Park System, of which Custer Battlefield National Monument is a unit, is dedicated to conserving the scenic, scientific, and historic heritage of the United States for the benefit and enjoyment of its people.
    [Show full text]
  • Did Meade Begin a Counteroffensive After Pickett's Charge?
    Did Meade Begin a Counteroffensive after Pickett’s Charge? Troy D. Harman When examining the strategy of Union Major General George Gordon Meade at the battle of Gettysburg, one discovers lingering doubts about his leadership and will to fight. His rivals viewed him as a timid commander who would not have engaged at Gettysburg had not his peers corralled him into it. On the first day of the battle, for instance, it was Major General John Fulton Reynolds who entangled the left wing of the federal army thirty miles north of its original defensive position at Westminster, Maryland. Under the circumstances, Meade scrambled to rush the rest of his army to the developing battlefield. And on the second day, Major General Daniel Sickles advanced part of his Union 3rd Corps several hundred yards ahead of the designated position on the army’s left, and forced Meade to over-commit forces there to save the situation. In both instances the Union army prevailed, while the Confederate high command struggled to adjust to uncharacteristically aggressive Union moves. However, it would appear that both outcomes were the result of actions initiated by someone other than Meade, who seemed to react well enough. Frustrating to Meade must have been that these same two outcomes could have been viewed in a way more favorable to the commanding general. For example, both Reynolds and Sickles were dependent on Meade to follow through with their bold moves. Though Reynolds committed 25,000 Union infantry to fight at Gettysburg, it was Meade who authorized his advance into south-central Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Gettysburg: Three Days of Glory Study Guide
    GETTYSBURG: THREE DAYS OF GLORY STUDY GUIDE CONFEDERATE AND UNION ORDERS OF BATTLE ABBREVIATIONS MILITARY RANK MG = Major General BG = Brigadier General Col = Colonel Ltc = Lieutenant Colonel Maj = Major Cpt = Captain Lt = Lieutenant Sgt = Sergeant CASUALTY DESIGNATION (w) = wounded (mw) = mortally wounded (k) = killed in action (c) = captured ARMY OF THE POTOMAC MG George G. Meade, Commanding GENERAL STAFF: (Selected Members) Chief of Staff: MG Daniel Butterfield Chief Quartermaster: BG Rufus Ingalls Chief of Artillery: BG Henry J. Hunt Medical Director: Maj Jonathan Letterman Chief of Engineers: BG Gouverneur K. Warren I CORPS MG John F. Reynolds (k) MG Abner Doubleday MG John Newton First Division - BG James S. Wadsworth 1st Brigade - BG Solomon Meredith (w) Col William W. Robinson 2nd Brigade - BG Lysander Cutler Second Division - BG John C. Robinson 1st Brigade - BG Gabriel R. Paul (w), Col Samuel H. Leonard (w), Col Adrian R. Root (w&c), Col Richard Coulter (w), Col Peter Lyle, Col Richard Coulter 2nd Brigade - BG Henry Baxter Third Division - MG Abner Doubleday, BG Thomas A. Rowley Gettysburg: Three Days of Glory Study Guide Page 1 1st Brigade - Col Chapman Biddle, BG Thomas A. Rowley, Col Chapman Biddle 2nd Brigade - Col Roy Stone (w), Col Langhorne Wister (w). Col Edmund L. Dana 3rd Brigade - BG George J. Stannard (w), Col Francis V. Randall Artillery Brigade - Col Charles S. Wainwright II CORPS MG Winfield S. Hancock (w) BG John Gibbon BG William Hays First Division - BG John C. Caldwell 1st Brigade - Col Edward E. Cross (mw), Col H. Boyd McKeen 2nd Brigade - Col Patrick Kelly 3rd Brigade - BG Samuel K.
    [Show full text]
  • Forrestine Cooper Hooker's Notes and Memoirs on Army Life in the West, 1871-1876, Arranged, Edited, and Annotated by Barbara E
    Forrestine Cooper Hooker's notes and memoirs on army life in the West, 1871-1876, arranged, edited, and annotated by Barbara E. Fisher Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Fisher, Barbara Esther, 1939- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 04/10/2021 03:17:15 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551645 FORRESTINE COOPER HOOKER'S NOTES AND MEMOIRS ON ARMY LIFE IN THE WEST, 1871 - 18?6 arranged, edited, and annotated by Barbara E, Fisher A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 6 3 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • John Cook Was a Diminutive 4 Feet 9 Inches Tall Upon His Enlistment at the Age of 14 on June 7, 1861
    Photo courtesy of G. Dodge John Cook was a diminutive 4 feet 9 inches tall upon his enlistment at the age of 14 on June 7, 1861. He was born on August 10, 1846 in Cincinnati, Ohio. Before the war he was a laborer. At the Battle of Antietam, the young bugler was awarded the Medal of Honor for serving the guns. See story on page 25 . 6 ARLINGTON HISTORICAL MAGAZINE The Civil War Medal of Honor Recipients of Arlington National Cemetery BY GEORGE w. DODGE Medal of Honor recipients did not initially hold Arlington National Cemetery in high regard since it originated as a potter's field during the Civil War on May 13, 1864. Over 5,000 soldiers were interred within a year. 1 After the war, the remains of several thousand soldiers within a cir­ cuit of fifty miles from Washington were disinterred and reinterred in Ar­ lington. Many were unknown. It would take the burials of distinguished high-ranking officers to begin to alter the perception of Arlington Burial Grounds as a potter's field. When General Philip H. Sheridan died on August 5, 1888 at Nonquitt, Massachusetts, he held the highest ranking position in the U.S. armed forces. Sheridan is popularly regarded as one of the three most prominent Union gen­ erals from the Civil War, along with Ulysses S. Grant and William T. Sherman.2 Sheridan's burial in front of the main entrance of Arlington House ushered in an era in which interment at Arlington was desirable. A series of interments of major generals and an admiral followed Sheridan's burial: General George Crook 1890 Admiral David Porter 1891 General Montgomery Meigs 1892 General Abner Doubleday 1893 General Stephen Burbridge 1894 General Walter Gresham 1895 General John Gibbon 1896 General John Mason 1897 General William Rosecrans 1898 General Horatio Wright 1899 The next sequence which gradually increased the status of Arlington Na­ tional Cemetery was the series of interments of 95 Civil War Mydal of Honor recipients.
    [Show full text]
  • Sitting Bull's 1884 Visit to St. Paul
    01 RCHS Sp03-Cover 6/12/03 7:43 PM Page iii RAMSEY COUNTY The St. Paul Volunteer Fireman and the Battle of Gettysburg HıstoryA Publication of the Ramsey County Historical Society Page 13 Spring, 2003 Volume 38, Number 1 An ‘Attempt’ on His Life? Sitting Bull’s 1884 Visit to St. Paul —Page 4 Sitting Bull around 1880, just before his 1884 visit to St. Paul. Minnesota Historical Society photograph. See article beginning on page 4 on Sitting Bull’s visit and an alleged attempt on his life. Minnesota Historical Society photograph. 02 RCHS Sp03-Mast 6/12/03 7:45 PM Page 2 RAMSEY COUNTY HISTORY Executive Director RAMSEY COUNTY Priscilla Farnham Editor Virginia Brainard Kunz Hıstory RAMSEY COUNTY Volume 38, Number 1 Spring, 2003 HISTORICAL SOCIETY BOARD OF DIRECTORS James A. Russell C O N T E N T S Chair Marlene Marschall 3 Letters President 4 ‘A Shady Pair’ and an ‘Attempt on His Life’— George Mairs First Vice President Sitting Bull and His 1884 Visit to St. Paul W. Andrew Boss Paul D. Nelson Second Vice President 13 The St. Paul Fireman Who Rose to Command the First Judith Frost Lewis Secretary Minnesota Volunteer Infantry Regiment at Gettysburg Peter K. Butler Patrick Hill Treasurer 17 The Volunteer Pioneer Hook and Ladder Company Duke Addicks, Charles L. Bathke, W. Andrew Boss, Peter K. Butler, Norbert Conzemius, 18 Oakland Cemetery and Its First 150 Years Anne Cowie, Charlton Dietz, Charlotte H. Chip Lindeke Drake, Joanne A. Englund, Robert F. Garland, Howard Guthmann, Joan Higinbotham, Scott 19 Roots in the English John Wesley Hutton, Judith Frost Lewis, John M.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Styple, William B., Ed. Generals in Bronze: Interviewing the Commanders of the Civil War. Kearny, N.J.: Belle Grove Publis
    Styple, William B., ed. Generals in Bronze: Interviewing the Commanders of the Civil War. Kearny, N.J.: Belle Grove Publishing, 2005. Interview of Generals by sculptor, James Kelly Boyhood memories of the war, viiff New York, alcohol, viii=ix Lincoln’s reelection, ix-xi Fall of Richmond, Lincoln assassination, xi-xii Postwar life, xiiff Sheridan’s ride, xx Philip H. Sheridan, described, 1 Sword, Cedar Creek, 2-3 George A. Forsyth, Lee and Appomattox, 3-5 Grant, Sherman, 11 Sheridan at Cedar Creek, 11 Biographical background on Sheridan, 12ff Sherman, 18 Grant and Sherman, 22 Ely Samuel Parker, Overland campaign, Wilderness, Grant, Hancock, 23-25 Ely Samuel Parker, Appomattox, 25-27 Grant described, 30 Grant, James Harrison Wilson, swearing, 30 Shiloh, Grant, Sherman, 31 Grant, Lee, Appomattox, 31 Grant’s death and funeral, 35-37 John A. Logan described, Sherman, 38 Hooker described, 40 Peninsula campaign, Williamsburg, 40 Sickles, Meade, 41 Hooker on McClellan, 41 Stanton, 41 Hooker, Chancellorsville, 42-43 Rosecrans, alcohol, 43 Abner Doubleday, Fort Sumter, 45-47 John Gibbon, 47 McClellan, 47 Judson Kilpatrick, Hooker, 48-50, Jefferson C. Davis, Pea Ridge, 51, 55-56 Jefferson C. Davis, Sheridan, Cedar Creek, George Crook, Grant, 52 Winfield Scott Hancock, Gettysburg, 58-60 Sherman, 60 Jesse Reno, 60-61 Meade, Hancock, Warren, Gettysburg, Butterfield, Baldy Smith, 64-70 Daniel Butterfield, Gettysburg council of war, John Newton, Doubleday, Birney, Gibbon, Sickles, 71-80 Henry Slocum, Council of war at Gettysburg, 80-82 1 General Martin
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War News Articles
    American Battlefield Trust Joins exciting step in our ongoing quest to create Forces with Ancestry® and Fold3® meaningful connections to the past to Help Researchers Uncover generations.” Stories of Valor in Their Family The integration has begun with data centered Trees on the Civil War, and will expand with subsequent datasets related to the American Battlefield Trust, Revolutionary War and War of 1812. Learn [email protected] more at www.fold3.com/projectregiment. Ancestry, [email protected] “The Civil War may be the defining narrative in our nation’s history,” said Anne April 8, 2020 Mitchell with Ancestry. “But it isn’t just a single story — it’s more than three million! Washington, D.C. – Ancestry® and Fold3® Each participant has their own story, one have been helping people understand their that impacted family, community and all the ancestors and the individuals who fought for generations that came after them. Stitched causes large and small for decades. Now, together, these individual stories define who they are joining forces with the American we became as a nation.” Battlefield Trust so that users can find the veterans in their family’s past and learn The Trust will build upon the Ancestry® and about their combat experience’s impact on Fold3® focus on the “who” of a given family the generations who followed. tree, adding context as to the “where.” As the nation’s leading heritage land preservation organization, the Trust has protected more than 52,000 acres of battlefield land in 24 states. Its robust website, www.battlefields.org, offers “The American Battlefield Trust is thrilled information about hundreds of important to work with Ancestry® and Fold3® to help battles fought during America’s first century.
    [Show full text]
  • Artillery “When Properly Managed” Henry Hunt Vs. William N. Pendleton
    Papers of the 2017 Gettysburg National Military Park Seminar Artillery “When Properly Managed” Henry Hunt vs. William N. Pendleton Bert Barnett Lt. Colonel Tully McCrea was a young West Point–trained officer. During the battle of Gettysburg, he performed yeoman service as an artillerist on those famous fields. In 1898, he observed Gettysburg [Had] had been discussed from every point of view except that of the artillery; yet every account of the battle refers to the effectiveness of that arm. In this battle the whole of the artillery in both armies was fought for all it was worth and fully demonstrated the power and influence in battle of this battle when properly managed.1 [emphasis added.] The function of an army in combat is to kill people and break things. With increasingly lethal technologies appearing on the battlefield by the 1860’s, the largely defensive, yet long-ranged power of massed field artillery had increasingly proven its significance. The artillery commander who most effectively “managed” their “long arm” during battle was therefore most likely to guarantee a more complete victory for his commander – and so it would it prove during the Gettysburg Campaign. Given the terrain the battle unfolded across, the two supreme commanders on the field, General George Gordon Meade and General Robert E. Lee, would be at least in part, if not wholly, dependent upon the skill and actions of their prime subalterns for the requisite artillery dominance at key moments. For the Army of the Potomac, the lynch-pin of all of these facets was its Chief of Artillery, Henry Jackson Hunt.
    [Show full text]
  • Mahan at West Point, “Gallic Bias,” and the “Old Army”: the Subconscious of Leadership at Gettysburg
    Mahan at West Point, “Gallic Bias,” and the “Old Army”: The Subconscious of Leadership at Gettysburg Michael Phipps “In my dreams I hear again the crash of guns, the rattle of musketry, the strange, mournful mutter of the battlefield. But in the evening of my memory, always I come back to West Point.” Douglas MacArthur “…Napoleon stands unrivalled.” Dennis Hart Mahan “God and the soldier we like adore, In time of danger, not before. The danger past and all things righted, God is forgotten, the soldier slighted.” Thomas Jordan 1 Introduction What follows is not a discussion of the direct results of leadership on the Battle of Gettysburg. That subject is one of the most widely and deeply covered in all of American and world history. This paper is rather an examination of the subtle impact on the battle caused by the background of the highest-ranking leaders on the field. In a sense, it is a look at the subconscious of the leadership on the field. The Battle of Gettysburg, and with it the entire American Civil War, was in one sense, not a fight between slave and free, states’ rights and central federal, industrial and agrarian, north and south, “Johnny Reb” and “Billy Yank,” or the overdone cliché “brother against brother.” Rather, it was a fight at the highest command level between men with virtually identical backgrounds. That background consisted of four or five years attending the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York. There at least a year was spent in the classroom of Dennis Hart Mahan, Professor of Civil and Military Engineering and the Art (or Science) of War.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington National Guard Pamphlet
    WASH ARNG PAM 870-1-4 WASH ANG PAM 210-1-4 WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD PAMPHLET THE OFFICIAL HISTORY OF THE WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD VOLUME 4 THE WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD IN THE PHILIPPINE INSURRECTION HEADQUARTERS MILITARY DEPARTMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE ADJUTANT GENERAL CAMP MURRAY, TACOMA 33, WASHINGTON THIS VOLUME IS A TRUE COPY THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ROSTERS HEREIN HAVE BEEN REVISED BUT ONLY TO PUT EACH UNIT, IF POSSIBLE, WHOLLY ON A SINGLE PAGE AND TO ALPHABETIZE THE PERSONNEL THEREIN DIGITIZED VERSION CREATED BY WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 4 WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD IN THE PHILIPPINE INSURRECTION CHAPTER PAGE I WASHINGTON TERRITORIAL MILITIA IN THE .......................... 1 POST CIVIL WAR PERIOD II WASHINGTON TERRITORIAL MILITIA IN THE .......................... 7 NEZ PERCE WAR OF 1877 III WASHINGTON TERRITORIAL MILITIA IN THE ........................41 BANNOCK INDIAN WAR OF 1878 IV BEGINNING OF THE ORGANIZED MILITIA IN ..........................66 THE TERRITORY OF WASHINGTON V WASHINGTON TERRITORY ORGANIZED MILITIA ..................89 IN THE CHINESE INCIDENT IN SEATTLE VI ORGANIZATION OF THE FIRST AND SECOND ...................... 102 REGIMENTS, WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD VII EARLY USE OF THE WASHINGTON NATIONAL ................... 117 GUARD IN STATE EMERGENCIES VIII WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD IN THE ............................ 149 PRE-PHILIPPINE INSURRECTION PERIOD IX WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD IN THE ............................ 169 PHILIPPINE INSURRECTION, 1898-1899 X ROSTERS OF FIRST REGIMENT OF WASHINGTON .............. 174 UNITED STATES VOLUNTEERS - i - - ii - CHAPTER I WASHINGTON TERRITORIAL MILLITIA DURING THE POST CIVIL WAR PERIOD Following the end of the Civil War and the mustering out of the First Washington Territory Infantry, the Indians in Washington Territory remained fairly peaceful thereby permitting the citizens of Washington Territory to recover their economy which had been wrecked by conflicts with the Indians during the past decade.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study in Command: Hancock at Gettysburg, June 20-23, 2012
    BGES Presents: A Study in Command: Hancock at Gettysburg, June 20-23, 2012 Perhaps the best way to describe Winfield Scott Hancock is to quote Ed Bearss from his and Parker Hills’ masterful work, Receding Tide. What better way to get the flavor of this program? “Hancock has gained the nom de guerre of ‘Hancock the Superb’ from Major General George McClellan at Williamsburg. Now, Hancock is one of those men with a commanding presence. He is 6’ 2” tall; is a resident of Norristown, Pennsylvania; and is a West Pointer, class of 1844. He graduated 18th in his class of 44, so he is an infantryman. Hancock uses profanity like an artist uses oils, but he still looks every bit the part of a soldier. It’s said that men feel confident when they are around him, and this will be very important on the afternoon of July 1st at Cemetery Hill, and again on July 2nd and 3rd at Cemetery Ridge. At the age of 39, Hancock is losing the “battle of the bulge,” so he always wears a long frock coat. His other trademark is his ever-present, clean, starched, white shirt.” Bearss describes Hancock on the first day at Gettysburg: “Ewell’s and Hancock’s methods of command couldn’t be more different. Hancock is not a vacillating old man. Ewell is only seven years older than Hancock, but Ewell is evidently far beyond his physical peak. Hancock then makes probably the most important order of the day. He sees nobody on Culp’s Hill, 800 yards to the east, and he says to Doubleday, ‘General Doubleday, I want you to send Wadsworth and the Iron Brigade over to that hill.’ Doubleday replies, ‘But, General, those men are tired and out of ammunition.’ Hancock says, sharply, and probably with an oral oil painting of obscenity, “General, I want you to understand that I am in command here.
    [Show full text]