Recent Advances in Our Knowledge of Australian Anisakid Nematodes 6 ⇑ 7 Q1 Shokoofeh Shamsi
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
IJPPAW 61 No. of Pages 10, Model 5G 15 April 2014 International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife xxx (2014) xxx–xxx 1 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijppaw 2 Invited Review 5 4 Recent advances in our knowledge of Australian anisakid nematodes 6 ⇑ 7 Q1 Shokoofeh Shamsi 8 School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, NSW 2650, Australia 109 11 article info abstract 2513 14 Article history: Anisakidosis is an emerging infection associated with a wide range of clinical syndromes in humans 26 15 Received 30 September 2013 caused by members of the family Anisakidae. Anisakid nematodes have a cosmopolitan distribution 27 16 Revised 28 March 2014 and infect a wide range of invertebrates and vertebrates during their life cycles. Since the first report 28 17 Accepted 1 April 2014 of these parasites in humans during the early 60s, anisakid nematodes have attracted considerable atten- 29 18 Available online xxxx tion as emerging zoonotic parasites. Along with rapid development of various molecular techniques dur- 30 ing last several decades, this has caused a significant change in the taxonomy and systematics of these 31 19 Q3 Keywords: parasites. However, there are still huge gaps in our knowledge on various aspects of the biology and ecol- 32 20 Anisakidae ogy of anisakid nematodes in Australia. Australian anisakids are mainly known through the works of 33 21 Australia 22 Anisakidosis Johnson and Mawson in the mid 20th century. Although the use of advanced morphological and molec- 34 23 Taxonomy ular techniques to study anisakids had a late start in Australia, great biodiversity was found and unique 35 24 species were discovered. Here an updated list of members within the family and the current state of 36 knowledge on Australian anisakids will be provided. Given that the employment of advanced techniques 37 to study these important emerging zoonotic parasites in Australia is recent, further research is needed to 38 understand the ecology and biology of these socio economically important parasites. After a recent 39 human case of anisakidosis in Australia, such understanding is crucial if control and preventive strategies 40 are to be established in this country. 41 Ó 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license 42 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). 43 44 45 46 Contents 47 1. Introduction . ....................................................................................................... 00 48 2. History of study of anisakid nematodes in Australia . ................................................................. 00 49 3. List of anisakid nematodes reported in Australia and their current taxonomic status . .............................................. 00 50 4. Life cycle of Australian anisakid nematodes. ................................................................. 00 51 5. Public health significance of anisakid nematodes in Australia . ................................................................. 00 52 6. Significance of anisakid nematodes on Australian wildlife health . .............................................. 00 53 7. Conclusion . ....................................................................................................... 00 54 Acknowledgements . .................................................................................... 00 55 References . ....................................................................................................... 00 56 57 58 1. Introduction humans (Van Thiel et al., 1960). Since then there have been many 64 studies carried out that increased awareness, improved diagnostic 65 59 Members of the family Anisakidae infect animals of almost all techniques and broadened our knowledge about various aspects of 66 60 phyla, and are particularly prevalent in fish and aquatic associated their biology and pathogenicity. Anisakid nematodes are regarded 67 61 animals. In the northern hemisphere, interest in these organisms as economically important parasites that are recognised as emerg- 68 62 grew tremendously following the discovery that larval stage of Ani- ing seafood borne parasites with unique characteristics. It is known 69 63 sakis from the North Sea herring, Clupea harengus, are able to infect that even one single dead anisakid larva in properly cooked sea- 70 food may cause serious disease in humans (Audicana et al., 71 Q2 ⇑ Tel./fax: +61 269334887. 2002); anisakid larvae do not die immediately after the host’s 72 E-mail address: [email protected] death, migrating instead from internal organs to the flesh of the 73 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2014.04.001 2213-2244/Ó 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Please cite this article in press as: Shamsi, S. Recent advances in our knowledge of Australian anisakid nematodes. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2014.04.001 IJPPAW 61 No. of Pages 10, Model 5G 15 April 2014 2 S. Shamsi / International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife xxx (2014) xxx–xxx 74 host, where they are more likely to be transferred to the definitive 75 host(s). Unlike many other common parasitic diseases of humans, 76 anisakidosis is not a problem of developing countries only (Gorok- 77 hov et al., 1999; Smith, 1999; Lopez-Serrano et al., 2000; Chai et al., 78 2005; Kapral et al., 2009; Shamsi and Butcher, 2011)(Fig. 1). 79 Hence, it is not surprising that a review of the literature found a 80 sharp increase in the number of publications since the 1960s 81 (Fig. 2). However, to date only 2% of these publications are about 82 Australian anisakids. In the Northern Atlantic and Northern Pacific, 83 the economic importance of the fishing industry has prompted re- 84 search on the parasites of marine fauna and as a result, many as- 85 pects of the biology and ecology of these parasites have been 86 studied, but the parasites of Australian marine animals are poorly 87 known. Fig. 2. Number of published articles on anisakid nematodes (key word: Anisakidae) 88 The history of studies of anisakids in Australia shows a contro- until 2013; based on the search on Web of Science and CABI (Gorokhov et al., 1999; 89 versial taxonomy. Australian anisakids are known mostly by the Smith, 1999; Lopez-Serrano et al., 2000; Chai et al., 2005; Kapral et al., 2009; Shamsi 90 works of Johnston and Mawson in the 1940’s but since then there and Butcher, 2011). 91 has been no review on importance of those findings and the cur- 92 rent status of taxa reported by them. In some recent publications (Shamsi et al., 2013) but they are not as harmful as members of 114 93 on Australian anisakids wrong taxonomy, old nomenclature and anisakid nematodes for human health. An article that states fish 115 94 assignment of species to wrong families occurs, possibly due to are infected with Hysterothylacium spp. and places them under ani- 116 95 the lack of compact information on changes to the taxonomy and sakids can potentially lead to raising a false alert among decision 117 96 nomenclature of Australian species of anisakids. For example, a makers who are not necessarily taxonomists at potentially tremen- 118 97 common confusion relates to the genus Hysterothylacium which dous cost to the Australian fishing industry. 119 98 was resurrected in 1981 to include those species previously con- This review presents the history of research on Australian anisa- 120 99 sidered as Thynnascaris and Contracaecum (Deardorff and Over- kid nematodes, a list of taxa reported in Australia followed by their 121 100 street, 1981) and is now classified under family current taxonomic status, the current state of knowledge on life cy- 122 101 Raphidascarididae (Fagerholm, 1991; Nadler and Hudspeth, cle and health impacts of Australian anisakids, and the questions 123 102 2000) instead of Anisakidae. However, literature review shows these findings raise. 124 103 there are still 47 publications worldwide, some from Australia, in 104 which Thynnascaris has been reported from various hosts or stud- 2. History of study of anisakid nematodes in Australia 125 105 ied, without referring to its significant morphological features in 106 details. Therefore, one cannot draw conclusions about the host, There is a paucity of information on anisakid nematodes in Aus- 126 107 geographical distribution and pathogenic aspects of the specimens tralia. Australian anisakids are known principally from early works 127 108 reported in these articles. More importantly, Hysterothylacium is by Johnston and Mawson (Johnston, 1910, 1913, 1937, 1938; John- 128 109 still reported as an anisakid nematode instead of raphidascarids ston and Mawson, 1939, 1940a,b, 1941a, 1942b,c,d, 1943a,b, 1944, 129 110 in some publications. For decision makers in the seafood industry, 1945a,b, 1947a, 1949, 1951a, 1952, 1953; Mawson, 1953, 1957, 130 111 health sectors and fisheries in several parts of the world, it makes a 1969). These authors reported and described 32 species of anisakid 131 112 significant difference in how they deal with anisakids versus raph- nematodes, from a broad range of Australian animals. Although 132 113 idascarids. Hysterothylacium larvae are very abundant in fish their contribution to our knowledge on anisakid