Threatened Species
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Magazine of National Parks Association of Queensland threatened species wild dogs a conservation dilemma understanding threatened species springbrook national park twin falls circuit walk antarctic beech the national park experience - from a child’s perspective Issue 8 April - May 2016 Connect and Protect1 Mission Statement Contents The National Parks Association promotes From the President 3 the preservation, expansion, good management and presentation of National Wild dogs - a conservation dilemma 4 Parks in Queensland. Understanding threatened species 6 Springbrook National Park 8 Get Involved in NPAQ: Twin Falls Circuit walk, Springbrook 10 NPAQ welcomes people from all walks of life and offers a variety of ways to be involved: Antarctic Beech 12 • Have Fun in the Bush – come along on a The National Park Experience 13 bushwalk or other activity • Get your Hands Dirty – participate in on- What’s On 14 ground conservation efforts Annual Raffle Results 15 • Join Us – become a member • Step Up – become a National Parks Conservation member Council • Be a National Parks Protector – join our President Michelle Prior regular giving program Vice Presidents Tony O’Brien • Donate – support the work of NPAQ Athol Lester • Participate in Exciting Projects – volunteer • Subscribe – receive Protected and Hon Secretary Debra Marwedel Neck of the Woods in your inbox Asst Hon Secret Yvonne Parsons • Connect – Like Us on the NPAQ Hon Treasurer Graham Riddell Facebook page Councillors Julie Hainsworth • Stay in Touch – read regular updates on the NPAQ website Peter Ogilvie • Share a Bush Adventure with Children Richard Proudfoot – download NPAQ’s Kids in National Des Whybird Parks series Mike Wilke Staff Guidelines for Contributors Conservation Principal: NPAQ invites contributions to Protected Kirsty Leckie articles. Please email [email protected] Business Development Officer: for a schedule of future editions. Anna Tran Contributors, please include contact details Project & Office Administrator: and brief personal summary. Articles can Jeannie Rice be submitted via email or hard copy. Digital photos should be minimum 300dpi. Editorial Team Kirsty Leckie, Jeannie Rice, Michelle Prior Copyright and Disclaimer Contact Details NPAQ retains copyright of Protected. Articles may be quoted provided that Unit 10/36 Finchley Street, Milton appropriate acknowledged occurs in the PO Box 1040, Milton QLD 4064 reproduction and use of material. ABN: 60 206 792 095 Articles in Protected do not necessarily Phone: (07) 3367 0878 reflect the opinion or position of the National Web: www.npaq.org.au Parks Association of Queensland. Email: [email protected] Advertising Enquiries Advertising Policy Please email [email protected] or phone (07) 3367 0878 Advertisements are required to align with relevant NPAQ policies. NPAQ reserves Images the right to refuse any advertisement at any time. Advertisement in Protected does not Cover - Springbrook NP (K Leckie). imply NPAQ’s endorsement of the products Strip p2 - Mountain White gum bark (Eucalyptus dalrympleana subsp. heptantha). (Paul Donatiu). or services. 2 Connect and Protect FROM THE PRESIDENT Michelle Prior, NPAQ President Welcome to the April/May edition Unfortunately, in many circumstances, to encourage all sides of debate on of Protected. advocacy is the only means available environmental issues, and ensure freedom of speech. The High Court A controversial federal government to redress an imbalance and provide has recognised the implied freedom report released in May is a vehicle for community members to of political communication in the recommending that the federal engage with often complex legislative, Constitution - what is proposed is government draconically dictate the institutional and policy decision making. tantamount to a restriction on political terms of purpose for environmental This improves the functioning of speech. Environmental issues are Not-For-Profit organisations – that of government and the outcome for the matters of public importance, and supporting ‘practical environment work environment, as well as the community. may not be so easy to dismiss in the community’. In many instances, it is due to past constitutionally. Citizens also have a The House of Representatives advocacy efforts by charitable environment organisations, that right to donate equally to the charity of Committee inquiry into the tax their choice. deductibility of environment Australia’s natural environment 685 submissions were made to the organisations recommends that contributes to the multi-billion dollar inquiry, with the majority objecting to such organisations lose their tax tourism industry today. any plans to impose stricter terms on deductibility status for public donations, There is little logic to the argument environmental organisations than other unless a quarter of donated funds is that only on-ground works benefit the charities. The National Parks Australia spent on remediation work, such as environment and society, as the cost of Council (of which NPAQ is a member) tree planting, weeding, controlling planting a tree and the years it takes to made a submission to the inquiry. pests or wildlife rehabilitation (The grow, hardly offset the value of mature House of Representatives Standing or old growth tree saved from the However, the Committee choose to Committee on Environment: Inquiry bulldozer by the efforts of passionate ignore these submissions, preferring into the Register of Environmental individuals or dedicated organisations. to rely on ideology rather than Organisations). Some also argue that on-ground works, evidence. The Labor members of the committee, found “…. it extraordinary This arbitrary figure would be applied are in fact the least efficient method that government members have to all current NFP environmental of protecting the environment, and in recommended to, in effect, constrain organisations that have DGR some cases, are a way of cost shifting the capacity of environmental (deductible gift recipients) status, environmental repair to volunteers from organisations to engage in advocacy regardless of the purpose for which what should be core responsibilities of work. We completely reject this they were established, eg. advocating corporations and government. undemocratic proposition. Citizens for the protection of the environment, It is also worth considering the should be supported to question education, research, law reform sociological impact. DGR status government decision-making and or reporting wildlife crimes. Many currently acts somewhat as a ‘choke’ corporate power, not manoeuvred into environmental organisations do not on political action by environment silence by legislative and administrative undertake any on-ground work, organisations, who by and large action.” concentrating on preserving nature, not maintain non-partisan positions and, attempting to replace that which has in many instances, work constructively Pause for a moment, and contemplate been destroyed. with governments of all political how many of your favourite national parks in Queensland are the result Environment organisations undertake orientation. By removing DGR status, of advocacy: Lamington, Girraween, a wide variety of work to protect and there is the likelihood that some Fraser Island (Great Sandy), Cooloola conserve Australia’s unique natural sections of the community would (Great Sandy), Daintree, Tamborine, environment. As within any other become disenfranchised and potentially Bunya Mountains, Springbrook, charitable sector, advocacy plays as increasingly radicalised in their efforts to Barron Gorge, to name just a few. All important a function as on-ground work express concerns about environmental achieved through the commitment of (for example, advocating for children’s issues. people supported by the commitment rights and implementing actions to As a democratic nation, advocacy in of communities – advocating for the safeguard children), as does education the environmental sector is essential conservation of nature. or research. 3 WILD DOGS - A CONSERVATION DILEMMA Neil Douglas, NPAQ Member This article examines the environmental roughly westwards from the western is also evidence that they reduce over- and economic effects of wild dogs and Darling Downs, passes to the north populations of kangaroos. However, how the animals can be controlled. of Roma, Charleville and Quilpie, then they tend to be more vicious and turns south to the state border west indiscriminate than dingoes and may Background on wild dogs of Thargomindah. The area south of pose a greater threat to humans in The term “wild dog” includes both feral this fenceline is meant to be wild dog settled areas. They readily hybridise domestic dogs, dingoes and hybrids free – but does enclose some national with dingoes and the offspring may of both. However, wild dogs and parks and other protected areas where be more aggressive than either. dingoes are treated differently under dingoes were part of the pre-European Generally, the “purest” strains of the Nature Conservation Act, with environment. dingoes are in remoter or more dingoes being a protected species isolated areas (e.g. Fraser Island). Despite part of Queensland being on the conservation estate land. In The degree of hybridisation is greater enclosed by the barrier fence, the common with feral dogs, dingoes are in more closely settled parts of the Department of Employment, Economic not protected in other areas. country. Development and Innovation (DEEDI) Dingoes were introduced