DOCSLIB.ORG

Oxygenated Fuel from Bio-Oil Via Methylation of Acids and Phenolics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Oxygenated Fuel from Bio-oil via Methylation of Acids and Phenolics Suh-Jane Lee, Evgueni Polikarpov, Huamin Wang and Karl Albrecht Chemical and Biological Process Development Group Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 902 Battelle Blvd., Richland, WA 99352, USA 1 Background The Co-Optimization of Fuels and Engines (Co-Optima) project is a collaborative project between national labs, universities and industry to develop new fuels and engine architectures in tandem to maximize performance and carbon efficiency with low GHGs emission. Objectives for Future Fuels: 1. Reduce petroleum consumption 2. Improve fuel economy 3. Decrease pollutants and GHG emission 4. Accelerate the speed of advanced biofuel deployment 2 Future Fuels-Oxygenated Fuel 1. Advantages a. No need for addition of hydrogen to remove oxygen during upgrading process b. Atom efficiency without loss of oxygen c. Enhance Octane Number 2. Market interests: “Industry is experiencing an Octane lovefest; Petroleum marketers have talked about higher octane demand for future fuels.” -Ron Lamberty in the April, 2016 issue of EPM 3. Aryl ethers are particularly effective anti-knock additives for gasolines. Dolhyj et al. USA Patent 4,412,847, 1983“ Motor Fuel Additive” Compound RON MON AKI (R+M)/2 n-Octane -20 n-Heptane 0 0 0 n-hexane 25 26.0 26 n-pentane 62 61.9 62 ethanol 107 n-butanol 92 71 83 Methyl acetate >120 Anisole 103 Methyl acetate as a component octane commercial gasoline by Amirkhanow K. Sh. and Kislitsyn, A. A. Oil and Gas Business, 2014, 1, 178-192 3 Esters and Aryl Ethers from Bio-oil? 1. Advantage: Bio-oil is rich in acid and phenolics, a mixture of 30% water, 10% acids , 20% aldehydes/ketones, 15% alcohols and 30% phenolics and other H OH O O miscellaneous compounds. O O O O OH O O 3-methyl- HO O furfural O O OH O HO O O H 2(3H)-furanone OH furan O acetaldehyde methyl formate formic acid O levoglucosan O acetic acid OH 5-hydroxymethylfurfural O O H H hydroxyacetaldehyde O OH O O OH 2-methylcyclopent- O O O methanol water acetone 2-en-1-one 5-methylfurfural furfuryl alcohol furan-2(5H oxygenates and water )-one Light 5-methylfuran-2(3H)-one (not suitable as fuels) OH HO O OH Sugar-derived products phenol HO 4-methyl guaiacol HO HO O O OH OH hydroquinone O coumaryl HO HO syringol isoeugenol alcohol O O HO O O O eugenol OH vanillin OH HO OH O HO OH coniferyl alcohol O O O O 4-vinylsyringol p-vinyl guaiacol 4-propenyl syringol HO resorcinol OH HO OH OH O OH O sinapyl alcohol catechol 4-vinyl phenol 2-methoxyphenol 2. Challenge: Lignin-derived products Two individual chemistries will be conducted in a complicated mixture • Carboxylic acids to esters • Phenolics to aryl ethers 4 Technical Approaches 1. Conversion of carboxylic acids to esters using an acid catalyst and alcohols O O + acid ROH OH catalyst OR 2. Conversion of phenolics to aryl ethers using a methylation agent via O-alkylation OH OR MR base + Methylation o catalyst MR= ROH, > 400 C reagent o DMC, ~160 C OH OC2H5 O + acid cat. o OC2H5 160 C Sarmah, B. and Srivastava, R. Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 210-215 5 First Attempt: One Pot Methylation of Acid and Phenol OH OCH3 O O + Acid cat. Acid cat. CH3OH OH OCH3 + What are yields of methyl acetate and anisole? OH OCH3 O O + 45 + zeolite Beta CH3OH 2 + 1 160o 6h OH C, OCH3 ~70.7% ~4.5% 1. Reaction equilibrium likely 2. Esterification rate >> Etherification rate 6 Different Ratio of Acids & Phenols with Methanol OH OCH3 O O O + CH OH + zeolite Beta 3 + OH 160o 6h OCH3 C, OCH3 Anisole from Methanol / acetic acid / phenol 120 100 80 % 60 phenol conversion 40 anisole selectivity 20 0 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 ratio of phenol / acetic acid ( methyl acetate ) 1. Poor yield of anisole 2. Can we improve anisole yield? 7 Methylation of Phenol with Methyl Acetate O OH O OCH3 O O + Zeolite Beta H3C OCH3 + o + H C OH CH 170 C/400 psi 3 + 3OH Results of methyl acetate and phenol reaction MA/Ph = 4:1 MA/Ph = 25:1 Conversion of Phenol 38.30% 37.90% Selectivity of Anisole 89.40% 94.30% Apparently zero order in phenol 8 Alkyl Ester Reactions with Phenol Comparison of Alkyl Acetate H O + H+ O 100 R R 80 O O 60 phenol conversion % % 40 aryl ether selectivity % H 20 O 0 methyl acetate ethyl acetate t-butyl acetate H3C O R Sarmah, B. and Srivastava, R. Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 210-215 R R R OH O O H - + H Stability of carbocation: t-butyl > ethyl> methyl 9 Second Attempt: Two step methylation Step 1: O O MeOH + acid cat. OH OCH3 Step 2: OH OCH3 O MeOH + cat. base + + H3CO OCH3 DMC CO2 Methylation of Phenol and Its Derivatives with Dimethyl Carbonate in the Presence of Mn2(CO)10, W(CO)6, and Co2(CO)8 2013 R. I. Khusnutdinov, N. A. Shchadneva, and Yu. Yu. Mayakova 10 Methylation Validation with Model Compounds OH OH OCH3 OCH3 O H 3CO + K2CO3 H3CO 160oC H3CO OCH3 1 1 2.5 85% 89% 11 What happens to methyl acetate in the system with a base catalyst? OH OCH3 O O CO2 2 + K2CO3 OCH3 1 + 1.5 H CO OCH o + 3 3 160 C, 400psi CH3OH Base ? O Analysis result Phenol conversion 98.80% OH Anisole selectivity 100% + Methyl acetate no signification change CH3OH Acetic acid below detection limit 12 Liquid-Liquid Extraction: Target Carboxylic Acid and Phenol Comparison of Extractants: Cyanex vs. EtOAc vs. MtBE 120.0% 100.0% 80.0% 60.0% % Dry base % Dry 40.0% Cyanex EtOAc 20.0% MtBE 0.0% 1. Cyanex is an excellent extractant but it is difficult to recover chemicals 2. EtOAc extracts more carbon but carries more water and sugars with less acid 3. MtBE was chosen as the extactant due to low BP, better acid recovery, and less sugar extracted 13 Liquid-Liquid Extraction: Can a H2O wash remove sugar and heavy lignin fragments? Water MtBE w-MtBE Bio-oil x 3 Water x 2 MtBE - MtBE soluble soluble ext. MtBE d-MtBE x 2 MtBE soluble -MtBE ext. Direct vs Indirect MtBE extraction Acidity of Extracted Liquid 40 100.0% 80.0% 30 d-MtBE 60.0% d-MtBE 20 w-MtBE 40.0% w-MtBE % Dry base Dry % % Recovery Recovery % 10 20.0% 0 0.0% Mass Sugar Acids Phenols TAN CAN PAN 14 Characterization of Liquid Extraction by 13C NMR 45 40 35 30 25 20 Feed 15 d-MtBE extracted 10 % Carbon Number % Carbon 5 w-MtBE extracted 0 w-MtBE d-MtBE 15 Methylation of acids and phenols in bio-oil Step 1 O zeolite Beta 10 CH OH + Acetic Acid in Bio-oil H O wash / MtBE exttracted) 3 ( 2 o 130 C, 400psi OCH3 Conversion of Acetic Acid = 92% Selectivity of Methylactate = 82% Step 2 OCH3 O K CO 1.5 DMC + Phenol in Product of Step 1 2 3 o OCH + (Phenolics) 170 C, 400psi 3 Conversion of Phenol = 33% Selectivity of anisole = 20% The concentrations of acetic acid and phenol in bio-oil were determined by CAN and PAN. 16 GC/MS Spectra of Methylation of Phenolics in Bio-oil Product benzene - benzene methyl - Tirmethoxy Trimethoxy Dimethoxy benzene Dimethoxy Abundance TIC: DMBS-2-F_A.D\data.ms 3000000 2900000 2800000 2700000 2600000 2500000 2400000 2300000 2200000 2100000 2000000 Feed 1900000 1800000 1700000 phenol Dimethoxy 1600000 1500000 1400000 1300000 1200000 1100000 1000000 900000 800000 700000 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 17 100000 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 Time--> Summary 1. Both esters and aryl ethers are potential fuel additives due to their high RON 2. Esters and aryl ethers could be produced from bio-oil, but the chemistry to produce them is not suited for a single step 3. We have demonstrated the two steps of methylation of carboxylic acid and phenol using model compounds. 4. Liquid-Liquid extraction of bio-oil is an effective way to remove sugars 5. The sequential production of esters and aryl ethers from bio-oil is challenging. 1. Esterification of the acids is straight forward and goes at high yield 2. Etherification of phenolics is challenging due to the presence of water 18 Acknowledgements: Funding from the U.S. Department of Energy through the Bioenergy Technologies Office Analytical Assistance: Teresa Lemmon Marie Swita 19 .
Recommended publications
  • The Separation of Three Azeotropes by Extractive Distillation by An-I Yeh A

    The Separation of Three Azeotropes by Extractive Distillation by An-I Yeh A

    The separation of three azeotropes by extractive distillation by An-I Yeh A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Science in Chemical Engineering Montana State University © Copyright by An-I Yeh (1983) Abstract: Several different kinds of extractive distillation agents were investigated to affect the separation of three binary liquid mixtures, isopropyl ether - acetone, methyl acetate - methanol, and isopropyl ether - methyl ethyl ketone. Because of the small size of the extractive distillation column, relative volatilities were assumed constant and the Fenske equation was used to calculate the relative volatilities and the number of minimum theoretical plates. Dimethyl sulfoxide was found to be a good extractive distillation agent. Extractive distillation when employing a proper agent not only negated the azeotropes of the above mixtures, but also improved the efficiency of separation. This process could reverse the relative volatility of isopropyl ether and acetone. This reversion was also found in the system of methyl acetate and methanol when nitrobenzene was the agent. However, normal distillation curves were obtained for the system of isopropyl ether and methyl ethyl ketone undergoing extractive distillation. In the system of methyl acetate and methanol, the relative volatility decreased as the agents' carbon number increased when glycols were used as the agents. In addition, the oxygen number and the locations of hydroxyl groups in the glycols used were believed to affect the values of relative volatility. An appreciable amount of agent must be maintained in the column to affect separation. When dimethyl sulfoxide was an agent for the three systems studied, the relative volatility increased as the addition rate increased.
  • Methyl Formate

    Methyl Formate

    SIGMA-ALDRICH sigma-aldrich.com Material Safety Data Sheet Version 5.0 Revision Date 09/17/2012 Print Date 03/13/2014 1. PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Product name : Methyl formate Product Number : 291056 Brand : Sigma-Aldrich Supplier : Sigma-Aldrich 3050 Spruce Street SAINT LOUIS MO 63103 USA Telephone : +1 800-325-5832 Fax : +1 800-325-5052 Emergency Phone # (For : (314) 776-6555 both supplier and manufacturer) Preparation Information : Sigma-Aldrich Corporation Product Safety - Americas Region 1-800-521-8956 2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION Emergency Overview OSHA Hazards Flammable liquid, Target Organ Effect, Harmful by ingestion., Irritant Target Organs Eyes, Kidney GHS Classification Flammable liquids (Category 1) Acute toxicity, Oral (Category 4) Acute toxicity, Inhalation (Category 4) Eye irritation (Category 2A) Specific target organ toxicity - single exposure (Category 3) GHS Label elements, including precautionary statements Pictogram Signal word Danger Hazard statement(s) H224 Extremely flammable liquid and vapour. H302 + H332 Harmful if swallowed or if inhaled H319 Causes serious eye irritation. H335 May cause respiratory irritation. Precautionary statement(s) P210 Keep away from heat/sparks/open flames/hot surfaces. - No smoking. P261 Avoid breathing dust/ fume/ gas/ mist/ vapours/ spray. P305 + P351 + P338 IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. HMIS Classification Health hazard: 2 Sigma-Aldrich - 291056 Page 1 of 7 Chronic Health Hazard: * Flammability: 4 Physical hazards: 0 NFPA Rating Health hazard: 2 Fire: 4 Reactivity Hazard: 0 Potential Health Effects Inhalation May be harmful if inhaled. Causes respiratory tract irritation. Skin Harmful if absorbed through skin.
  • Opinion on the SCCNFP on Methyl Acetate

    Opinion on the SCCNFP on Methyl Acetate

    SCCNFP/0694/03, final OPINION OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PRODUCTS AND NON-FOOD PRODUCTS INTENDED FOR CONSUMERS CONCERNING METHYL ACETATE adopted by the SCCNFP during the 24th plenary meeting of 24-25 June 2003 SCCNFP/0694/03, final Evaluation and opinion on : methyl acetate _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. Terms of Reference 1.1 Context of the question The Danish EPA has received a request from a poison information department in a hospital regarding the regulation of methyl acetate in cosmetics. A child had played with a nail polish remover containing 50 w/w % methyl acetate and there was suspicion that it had ingested some of the product. Methyl acetate is very quickly hydrolysed to acetic acid and methanol both whether inhaled or ingested. It is also well known that humans are more sensitive to methanol poisoning than rodents. In order to evaluate the acute toxicity of methyl acetate in humans, it was found rea- sonable to consider the acute toxicity of methanol as reported by clinical cases of poisoning. According to the IPCS report on methanol (Environmental Health Criteria 196, 1997), the lowest lethal dose in humans was considered to be 0.3-1.0 g/kg bw. Assuming a bodyweight of 10 kg for a child, the lowest lethal dose would be 3 g (or 0.09 mol) methanol, arising from the metabolism of 0.09 mol or 6.9 g methyl acetate. At a concentration of 50 w/w % methyl acetate, the lethal dose for humans might be 14 g of nail polish remover. The Danish EPA found it not unlikely that children could risk methanol poisoning if nail polish removers are not properly stored/contained.
  • UC Irvine UC Irvine Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC Irvine UC Irvine Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC Irvine UC Irvine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Steps Toward CO2 Reduction to Methanol via Electrochemical Cascade Catalysis Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4wx6g1vm Author Mercer, Ian Patrick Publication Date 2020 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Steps Toward CO2 Reduction to Methanol via Electrochemical Cascade Catalysis THESIS submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Chemistry by Ian Patrick Mercer Dissertation Committee: Professor Jenny Y. Yang, Chair Professor William J. Evans Professor Andy S. Borovik 2020 © 2020 Ian Patrick Mercer ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements iv Abstract v Chapter 1: Methyl Formate and Formaldehyde Reduction by Metal Hydrides 1 Chapter 2: Synthesis of Group 8 Metal Complexes of LDMA for the Study of Outer Sphere Interactions 25 Conclusion 33 Experimental 34 References 37 iii Acknowledgements I would like to express my sincere appreciation to my committee, especially my chair, Professor Jenny Y. Yang. Her commitment to science, mentoring, and ‘doing the right thing’ will forever inspire me. Financial support was provided by the University of California, Irvine and US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences Awards DE-SC0012150 and DE- 0000243266. iv Abstract of the Thesis Steps Toward CO2 Reduction to Methanol via Electrochemical Cascade Catalysis by Ian Patrick Mercer Master of Science in Chemistry University of California, Irvine, 2020 Professor Jenny Y. Yang, Chair Research on two independent projects is presented: (1) Homogeneous cascade catalysis has been used for the hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol as it allows for rational tuning of catalyst reactivity and lower reaction temperatures compared to heterogeneous catalysis.
  • Process for Producing Methyl Methacrylate Verfahren Zur Herstellung Von Methylmethacrylat Procede Pour La Fabrication De Methacrylate De Methyle

    Process for Producing Methyl Methacrylate Verfahren Zur Herstellung Von Methylmethacrylat Procede Pour La Fabrication De Methacrylate De Methyle

    ~™ II 1 1 III II II 1 1 II II I Ml II I II I II (19) J European Patent Office Office europeen des brevets (11) EP 0 406 676 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publicationation and mention (51 ) |nt. CI.6: C07C 69/54, C07C 67/20 of the grant of the patent: 27.03.1996 Bulletin 1996/13 (21) Application number: 90112194.7 (22) Date of filing: 27.06.1990 (54) Process for producing methyl methacrylate Verfahren zur Herstellung von Methylmethacrylat Procede pour la fabrication de methacrylate de methyle (84) Designated Contracting States: • Ebata, Shuji, DE ES FR GB IT NL C/o Mitsubishi Gas Chem. Com. Tayuhama, Niigata-shi, Niigata-ken (JP) (30) Priority: 04.07.1989 JP 171190/89 (74) Representative: Turk, Gille, Hrabal, Leifert (43) Date of publication of application: Brucknerstrasse 20 09.01.1991 Bulletin 1991/02 D-40593 Dusseldorf (DE) (73) Proprietor: MITSUBISHI GAS CHEMICAL (56) References cited: COMPANY, INC. DE-A- 3 436 608 Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo (JP) • PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 14, no. 68 (72) Inventors: (C- 686)(401 1 ), 8 February 1 990; & JP-A-1 290653 • Higuchi, Hirofumi, (MITSUBISHI GAS CHEM) 22.11. 1989 C/o Mitsubishi Gas Chem. Com. Tayuhama, Niigata-shi, Niigata-ken (JP) Remarks: • Kida, Koichi, The file contains technical information submitted C/o Mitsubishi Gas Chem. Com. after the application was filed and not included in this Tayuhama, Niigata-shi, Niigata-ken (JP) specification CO CO CO o Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to the European patent granted.
  • Safety Data Sheet in Compliance with OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200)

    Safety Data Sheet in Compliance with OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200)

    Safety Data Sheet In compliance with OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200) SECTION 1: IDENTIFICATION SDS Number: S-1651, version 8/9/2018 (a) Product identifier Gans Item ID: S-1651, S-1651D, S-1651G, S-1651P, S-1651Q Gans Description: Gans G2040 Compliant Cleaner (b) Other means of identification General description: Lithographic press cleaning solvent (c) Recommended use Product Use: Industrial use only Restrictions on use: Not for residential use. (d) Supplier’s details Manufacturer: Gans Ink and Supply Co, Inc. Address: 1441 Boyd Street Los Angeles, CA 90033 Contact Person: Marco Ramos Telephone: 323- 264-2200 x139 Email: [email protected] (e) Emergency telephone numbers: Chemical spill or physical hazard: Contact the Local Emergency Response Agency 9-1-1, or the Local Fire Department Ingestion or health hazard: Contact the National Capital Poison Center, Poison Control: 800 222-1222; Poison.org SECTION 2: HAZARD(S) IDENTIFICATION (a) Classification This mixture is hazardous according to OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Physical hazards: o Flammable Liquid Category 2 Health hazards: o Specific Target Organ Toxicity, Single Exposure (narcotic effect) - Category 3 o Eye Irritation - Category 2A (b) Label elements Signal Word: Danger Page 1 of 7 Hazard Statements: Flammable liquid and vapor; May cause drowsiness or dizziness; Causes serious eye irritation. Precautionary Statements: Prevention: Keep away from sparks, open flames – No smoking; Keep container tightly closed; Ground/bond container and receiving equipment; Use explosion-proof electrical/ventilating/ lighting/equipment; Use only non-sparking tools; Take precautionary measures against static discharge; Wear protective gloves, eye protection.
  • Process of Formic Acid Production by Hydrolysis

    Process of Formic Acid Production by Hydrolysis

    (19) TZZ ¥_T (11) EP 2 747 883 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: B01J 14/00 (2006.01) C07C 51/09 (2006.01) 15.02.2017 Bulletin 2017/07 C07C 53/02 (2006.01) B01J 10/00 (2006.01) B01D 3/10 (2006.01) C07C 51/44 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 12751504.7 (86) International application number: (22) Date of filing: 27.08.2012 PCT/EP2012/066622 (87) International publication number: WO 2013/030162 (07.03.2013 Gazette 2013/10) (54) PROCESS OF FORMIC ACID PRODUCTION BY HYDROLYSIS OF METHYL FORMATE VERFAHREN ZUR HERSTELLUNG VON AMEISENSÄURE DURCH HYDROLYSE VON METHYLFORMIAT PROCÉDÉ DE PRODUCTION D’ACIDE FORMIQUE PAR HYDROLYSE DE FORMIATE DE MÉTHYLE (84) Designated Contracting States: • TREJBAL, Jiri AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB 278 01 Kralupy nad Vltavou (CZ) GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO • ROOSE, Peter PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR 9831 Sint-Martens-Latem (BE) (30) Priority: 27.08.2011 US 201161528204 P (74) Representative: Gevers Patents Intellectual Property House (43) Date of publication of application: Holidaystraat 5 02.07.2014 Bulletin 2014/27 1831 Diegem (BE) (73) Proprietor: Taminco (56) References cited: 9000 Gent (BE) WO-A1-00/39067 US-A- 4 262 140 US-B1- 6 713 649 US-B2- 6 696 603 (72) Inventors: • PASEK, Josef 160 00 Praha 6 (CZ) Note: Within nine months of the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent in the European Patent Bulletin, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to that patent, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations.
  • BLUE BOOK 1 Methyl Acetate CIR EXPERT PANEL MEETING

    BLUE BOOK 1 Methyl Acetate CIR EXPERT PANEL MEETING

    BLUE BOOK 1 Methyl Acetate CIR EXPERT PANEL MEETING AUGUST 30-31, 2010 Memorandum To: CIR Expert Panel Members and Liaisons From: Bart Heldreth Ph.D., Chemist Date: July 30, 2010 Subject: Draft Final Report of Methyl Acetate, Simple Alkyl Acetate Esters, Acetic Acid and its Salts as used in Cosmetics . This review includes Methyl Acetate and the following acetate esters, relevant metabolites and acetate salts: Propyl Acetate, Isopropyl Acetate, t-Butyl Acetate, Isobutyl Acetate, Butoxyethyl Acetate, Nonyl Acetate, Myristyl Acetate, Cetyl Acetate, Stearyl Acetate, Isostearyl Acetate, Acetic Acid, Sodium Acetate, Potassium Acetate, Magnesium Acetate, Calcium Acetate, Zinc Acetate, Propyl Alcohol, and Isopropyl Alcohol. At the June 2010 meeting, the Panel reviewed information submitted in response to an insufficient data announcement for HRIPT data for Cetyl Acetate at the highest concentration of use (lipstick). On reviewing the data in the report, evaluating the newly available unpublished studies and assessing the newly added ingredients, the Panel determined that the data are now sufficient, and issued a Tentative Report, with a safe as used conclusion. Included in this report are Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (RIFM) sponsored toxicity studies on Methyl Acetate and Propyl Acetate, which were provided in “wave 2” at the June Panel Meeting but are now incorporated in full. The Tentative Report was issued for a 60 day comment period (60 days as of the August panel meeting start date). The Panel should now review the Draft Final Report, confirm the conclusion of safe, and issue a Final Report. All of the materials are in the Panel book as well as in the URL for this meeting's web page http://www.cir- safety.org/aug10.shtml.
  • Methyl Formate Mfm

    Methyl Formate Mfm

    METHYL FORMATE MFM CAUTIONARY RESPONSE INFORMATION 4. FIRE HAZARDS 7. SHIPPING INFORMATION 4.1 Flash Point: -26°F C.C. 7.1 Grades of Purity: Technical, practical, and Common Synonyms Liquid Colorless Pleasant odor 4.2 Flammable Limits in Air: 5%-22.7% spectro grades: all 97.5+% Formic acid, methyl ester 4.3 Fire Extinguishing Agents: Dry 7.2 Storage Temperature: <85°F Mixes with water. Flammable, irritating vapor is produced. Boiling point chemical, alcohol foam, carbon dioxide 7.3 Inert Atmosphere: No requirement is 88°F. 4.4 Fire Extinguishing Agents Not to Be 7.4 Venting: Pressure-vacuum Used: Water may be ineffective. 7.5 IMO Pollution Category: D Evacuate. 4.5 Special Hazards of Combustion Keep people away. Products: Not pertinent 7.6 Ship Type: 2 Shut off ignition sources. Call fire department. 4.6 Behavior in Fire: Vapor is heavier than 7.7 Barge Hull Type: Currently not available Notify local health and pollution control agencies. air and may travel considerable distance to a source of ignition and flash back. FLAMMABLE. 8. HAZARD CLASSIFICATIONS Fire 4.7 Auto Ignition Temperature: 853°F Containers may explode in fire. 8.1 49 CFR Category: Flammable liquid Flashback along vapor trail may occur. 4.8 Electrical Hazards: Currently not 8.2 49 CFR Class: 3 Vapor may explode if ignited in an enclosed area. available Extinguish with dry chemicals, alcohol foam, or carbon dioxide. 4.9 Burning Rate: 2.5 mm/min. 8.3 49 CFR Package Group: I Water may be ineffective on fire. 4.10 Adiabatic Flame Temperature: Currently 8.4 Marine Pollutant: No Cool exposed containers with water.
  • Working Fluid Selection for Space-Based Two-Phase Heat Transport Systems

    Working Fluid Selection for Space-Based Two-Phase Heat Transport Systems

    NBSIR 88-3812 Working Fluid Selection for Space-Based Two-Phase Heat Transport Systems Mark O. McLinden U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Bureau of Standards Gaithersburg, MD 20899 May 1988 Issued August 1988 75 Years Stimulating America's Progress 1913-1988 Prepared for: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center NBSIR 88-3812 WORKING FLUID SELECTION FOR SPACE-BASED TWO-PHASE HEAT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS Mark O. McLinden U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Bureau of Standards Gaithersburg, MD 20899 May 1988 Issued August 1988 Prepared for: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, C. William Verity, Secretary NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, Ernest Ambler, Director , ABSTRACT The working fluid for externally-mounted, space-based two-phase heat transport systems is considered. A sequence of screening criteria involving freezing and critical point temperatures and latent heat of vaporization and vapor density are applied to a data base of 860 fluids. The thermal performance of the 52 fluids which pass this preliminary screening are then ranked according to their impact on the weight of a reference system. Upon considering other non-thermal criteria ( f lagimability toxicity and chemical stability) a final set of 10 preferred fluids is obtained. The effects of variations in system parameters is investigated for these 10 fluids by means of a factorial design. i * . I . INTRODUCTION In order to remove the heat generated by electronics and other payloads on spacecraft some type of heat transport system is required. The heat generating equipment is typically attached to a 'cold plate'.
  • VAPOR-LIQUID EQUILIBRIUM DATA COLLECTION Chemistry Data Series

    VAPOR-LIQUID EQUILIBRIUM DATA COLLECTION Chemistry Data Series

    J. Gmehling U. Onken VAPOR-LIQUID EQUILIBRIUM DATA COLLECTION Esters Supplement 2 Chemistry Data Series Vol. I, Part 5b Published by DECHEMA Gesellschaft fur Chemische Technik und Biotechnologie e. V. Executive Editor: Gerhard Kreysa Bibliographic information published by Die Deutsche Bibliothek Die Deutsche Bibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; de­ tailed bibliographic data is available on the Internet at http://dnb.ddb.de ISBN: 3-89746-041-6 © DECH EMA Gesellschaft fOr Chemische Te chnik und Biotechnologie e. V. Postfach 15 01 04, D-60061 Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 2002 Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschutzt. Alle Rechte, auch die der Obersetzung, des Nachdrucks und der Vervielfi:Htigung des Buches oder Teilen daraus sind vorbehalten. Kein Teil des Werkes darf ohne schriftliche Genehmigung der DECHEMA in irgendeiner Form (Fotokopie, Mikrofilm oder einem anderen Verfahren), auch nicht fOr Zwecke der Un­ terrichtsgestaltung, reproduziert oder unter Verwendung elektronischer Systeme verarbei­ tet, vervielfaltigt oder verbreitet werden. Die Herausgeber Obernehmen fOr die Richtigkeit und Vollstandigkeit der publizierten Daten keinerlei Gewahrleistung. This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, including those of translation, reprinting, reproduction by photo­ copying machine or similar means. No partof this work may be reproduced, processed or distributed in any form, not even for teaching purposes - by photocopying, microfilm or other processes, or implemented in electronic information storage and retrieval systems - without the written permission of the publishers. The publishers accept no liability for the accuracy and completeness of the published data. This volume of the Chemistry Data Series was printed using acid-free paper.
  • Methyl Acetate 1458

    Methyl Acetate 1458

    METHYL ACETATE 1458 CH3COOCH3 MW: 74.08 CAS: 79-20-9 RTECS: AI9100000 METHOD: 1458, Issue 2 EVALUATION: FULL Issue 1: 16 December 1974 Issue 2: 15 August 1994 OSHA : 200 ppm PROPERTIES: liquid; d = 0.9244 g/mL @ 25 °C; NIOSH: 200 ppm; STEL 250 ppm BP = 54.05 °C; VP 23 kPa (173 mm Hg) ACGIH: 200 ppm; STEL 250 ppm @ 20 °C; vapor density (air = 1) 2.8 (1 ppm = 3.03 mg/m 3) SYNONYMS: acetic acid methyl ester; methyl acetic ester; methyl ethanoate SAMPLING MEASUREMENT SAMPLER: SOLID SORBENT TUBE TECHNIQUE: GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY, FID (coconut shell charcoal, 100 mg/50 mg) ANALYTE: methyl acetate FLOW RATE: 0.01 to 0.2 L/minute EXTRACTION: 1 mL CS2 VOL-MIN: 0.2 L @ 200 ppm INJECTION VOLUME: 1 µL -MAX: 10 L TEMPERATURE-INJECTOR: 250 °C SHIPMENT: refrigerated -DETECTOR: 300 °C -COLUMN: 35 °C (2 min) to 150 °C SAMPLE (10 °C/min) STABILITY: at least 6 days @ 5 °C COLUMN: DB-wax; 30 m, 0.32-mm ID, BLANKS: 2 to 10 field blanks per set 1-µm film thickness CARRIER GAS: He, 1 mL/min; ACCURACY MAKEUP GAS: N2, 30 mL/min 3 RANGE STUDIED: 343 to 1130 mg/m [1] CALIBRATION: solutions of methyl acetate in CS 2 (7-L samples) RANGE: 7 µg to 1000 µg [2] BIAS: 7.2% ˆ OVERALL PRECISION (S rT): 0.0547 [1] ESTIMATED LOD: 2 µg [2] ACCURACY: ± 16.8% PRECISION (S r): 0.036 @ 20 to 876 µg per sample [2] APPLICABILITY: The working range is 0.3 to 1330 ppm (1 to 440 mg/m 3) for a 7-L air sample [1].