Ganaraska River Watershed Background Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ganaraska River Watershed Background Report GANARASKA RIVER WATERSHED BACKGROUND REPORT For the Ganaraska River Fisheries Management Plan, Community Advisory Committee Prepared by: M. Desjardins, J. Lapierre and A. Smith March 2007 Ganaraska River Watershed Background Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The Ganaraska River Watershed has long been recognized for its clear cold water and excellent trout and salmon fisheries. Historically, the Ganaraska River supported healthy resident brook trout populations and migratory Atlantic salmon from Lake Ontario. In the early 1800s, dams near the mouth of the Ganaraska River blocked Atlantic salmon runs. By the 1870s, Atlantic salmon populations had collapsed in most Lake Ontario rivers. The role of Atlantic salmon as a top predator in Lake Ontario has since been replaced with stocked Pacific salmon and trout. The Ganaraska River ecosystem has seen a significant positive change since the 1940s when a series of studies and restoration projects began. Currently the Ganaraska River Watershed supports one of the largest wild rainbow trout runs in the Lake Ontario basin. In the past, fisheries management of the Ganaraska River was guided by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Lindsay District Fisheries Management Plan. In 2000, the plan expired and the lead agencies responsible for fish and aquatic habitat management merged to direct the development of a new management plan. A Technical Steering Committee (TSC) was established to help guide the development of a background report and fisheries management plan. Since 1994, the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) have collected information on the current state of the fisheries and aquatic habitat across the Ganaraska River Watershed. This report reviews the background information of the fisheries and aquatic habitat in the Ganaraska River Watershed. Variables analyzed include fish species, aquatic habitat, land cover, water quality and quantity. Distribution of dominant fish species and aquatic habitats were examined to identify spatial trends throughout the watershed. Historic fish community data were examined to determine if changes occurred through time. Water quality variables tested include ph (acidity), conductivity, chloride, nitrate, ammonia-ammonium, phosphorous, E.Coli and total coliforms. Watershed Catchments The Ganaraska River Watershed (Figure 2) was partitioned into 16 watershed catchments to help facilitate state of the resource reporting. The catchments are based on larger tributaries or sections of tributaries where dams or other barriers exist (Figure 1). Four distinct fish communities were identified in the Ganaraska River Watershed and are illustrated (Figure 3). Figure 1. Residential areas, major roads, and large dams within the Ganaraska River Watershed 10 7 8 `12 6 9 4 13 11 15 5 14 3 2 16 1 Catchment 1. Corbett Dam to Canton Dam 2. Canton Dam to Osaca 3. Osaca to Kendal – downstream of Jackson Dam 4. Headwater mainstem – upstream of Jackson Dam 11.Lower Little Ganaraska – downstream Elizabethville 5. Quay’s Branch Dam to Cold Springs Creek This map is for information purposes 6. North Ganaraska -Canton 12. Soper Branch only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no 7. North Ganaraska – upstream Garden Hill Dam 13. Burnham Branch responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information 8. North Ganaraska – upstream Fudge’s Mill Dam 14. Duck Pond Branch contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: January 2007. Produced 9. Cold Springs Creek 15. Elliott Stream using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, 10. Upper Little Ganaraska- upstream Elizabethville Dam 16. Welcome “Henwood Stream” GRCA and other municipal sources, Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2007 Figure 2. Ganaraska River Watershed catchments 10 7 8 `12 6 4 13 9 11 15 5 14 3 2 16 1 Fish Communities 1 - rainbow trout and minnow 2 - brown trout and minnow 3 - brown trout and sculpin 4 - brook trout and sculpin This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: January 2007. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources, Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2007 Figure 3. Dominant fish communities and catchments in the Ganaraska River Watershed Ganaraska River Watershed Background Report Fish Community Characteristics and Locations Fish Community 1: rainbow trout and minnow species This diverse fish community was dominated by rainbow trout as a top predator, but also present were white sucker, sculpin and a variety of minnow species including, blacknose dace, longnose dace, creek chub, and Johnny darter. Fish Community 1 is found in the mainstem north of Corbett’s Dam to Jackson Mill Dam containing Catchments 1,2 and 3 and the lower reaches of 9 and 13. The fish community boundaries then extend northeast including Catchments 11 and 15 and east into Quays Branch (Catchment 5) and Duck Pond (Catchment 14). The mainstem Catchments 1,2 and 3 have the largest drainage area of 94km2, longest channel length at 45km, and highest discharge. These catchments supported white sucker, longnose dace, creek chub, and Johnny darter but were dominated by the highest densities of rainbow trout in the watershed. The median maximum summer water temperature varied from 19.4oC to 23.9 oC, from the upper to lower reaches. Substrate consisted of gravel and cobble with increasing sands in the upper reaches. In Catchment 5 and 14 fish species diversity and density was lower than the mainstem catchments. In Catchment 5 species diversity and density decreased above a weir, located north of 5th Concession. Species included rainbow trout, blacknose dace, creek chub, and sculpin species. The median maximum summer temperature for both catchments was 21.7oC. Substrate consisted of sand in the upper reaches and mixed gravel and cobble in the lower reaches for both catchments. Both tributaries originate from a drumlinized till plain called the South Slope. The South Slope is an aquatard (containing soils not conducive to ground water discharge) resulting in low discharge compared to the other tributaries within the watershed. Adult Chinook salmon are prevalent within Fish Community 1 during spawning migration. Spawning activity was documented throughout Catchments 1,2 and 3 and in the lower reaches of Catchments 5,9,11,12,13,14. Due to Chinook life history, where they leave the stream within months of hatching to rear in Lake Ontario, they are rarely collected during summer electrofishing surveys. Therefore Chinook are not discussed in terms of the data analysis in the background document. Coho salmon have also been collected sporadically during the summer surveys and were not included in the analysis for the same reason as Chinook. It should be noted that the occurrence of pacific salmon is unique to Fish Community 1. Fish Community 2: brown trout and minnow species A second distinct fish community was identified in Catchment 6 on the North Ganaraska Branch between the Canton Hydroelectric Dam and Garden Hill Creek confluence. This community included brown trout, white sucker, Ganaraska River Watershed Background Report blacknose dace, longnose dace, and creek chub, but is dominated by brown trout and minnow species. The median maximum summer water temperature for this area was 20.0oC. Substrate composition throughout the tributary consisted of gravel, sand and cobble. Fish Community 3: brown trout and sculpin This community includes Catchment 4 north of Jackson Dam and the lower reaches of Catchment 12. Brown trout and sculpin species dominate this community; however brook trout were also prominent in the headwaters. The maximum summer water temperature for Catchment 4 was 18.3oC and mean maximum water temperature for the lower reach of Catchment 12 was 17.4oC. This section of the river was largely dominated by sand and gravel substrate. Fish Community 4: brook trout and sculpin The fourth fish community consists of all northern headwater streams including Catchment 4 north of Fish Community 3, Catchment 12 north headwaters, Catchment 13 north of County Rd. 9, Catchment 10 north of Elizabethville Dam, Catchment 12 northern tributaries, and Catchments 6,7 and 8 north of the Garden Hill Dam. Fish community 4 is dominated by brook trout and sculpin species. Catchment 4 includes all tributaries entering the Ganaraska River north of Fish Community 3. Fish species found include brown trout, rainbow trout, and sculpin species. The median maximum summer water temperature was 13oC and substrate was composed mainly of sand and large gravel. Cold Springs Creek (Catchment 9) had a maximum summer water temperature of 14.0oC in the upper reach to 20oC in the lower reach. Fish species found included brook trout, brown trout, rainbow trout, blacknose dace, creek chub, and sculpin species. Substrate was composed of sand, gravel, and cobble. Catchment 10 upstream of Elizabethville Dam on the Little Ganaraska Branch had a lower species diversity including brook trout, brown trout, rainbow trout, and sculpin species. The median maximum summer water temperature was 14.7oC. Substrate composition was mainly sand and gravel. Catchments 6,7 and 8 include tributaries of the North Ganaraska Branch above the Garden Hill Dam. Fish species found include brook trout,
Recommended publications
  • Lake Ontario Fish Communities and Fisheries
    LAKE ONTARIO FISH COMMUNITIES AND FISHERIES: 2013 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE LAKE ONTARIO MANAGEMENT UNIT LAKE ONTARIO FISH COMMUNITIES AND FISHERIES: 2013 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE LAKE ONTARIO MANAGEMENT UNIT Prepared for the Great Lakes Fishery Commission 2014 Lake Committee Meetings Windsor, ON Canada March 24-28, 2014 © 2014, Queen’s Printer for Ontario Printed in Picton, Ontario, Canada March 2014 Report ISSN 1201-8449 Please cite this report as follows: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. 2014. Lake Ontario Fish Communities and Fisheries: 2013 Annual Report of the Lake Ontario Management Unit. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Picton, Ontario, Canada. Report available on the following website: http://www.glfc.org/lakecom/loc/mgmt_unit/index.html TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ............................................................................................................................................. v 1. Status of Fish Communities 1.1 Nearshore Fish Community .................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Offshore Pelagic Fish Community ....................................................................................... 1 1.3 Offshore Benthic Fish Community ...................................................................................... 2 2. Index Fishing Projects 2.1 Ganaraska Fishway Rainbow Trout Assessment .................................................................. 3 2.2 Eastern Lake Ontario and Bay of Quinte Fish Community Index Gill Netting
    [Show full text]
  • Ganaraska Region
    What Are We Doing? What You Can Do Where Are We? The Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority oers and administers many programs and services Be a Watershed Steward! We are one of aimed to further the conservation, restoration, development and management of natural resources Ganaraska Region 36 Conservation within local watersheds. The success of these programs builds upon working partnerships with • Plant trees and shrubs on your property to increase forest connectivity and interior forest. Authorities across member municipalities, provincial ministries, local organizations, academia and watershed Ontario under residents. Programs and services support the vision and mission statements of the Ganaraska Region • Plant trees and shrubs along streams to improve and protect aquatic ecosystems. the umbrella Conservation Authority: “Working together for responsible stewardship of the ecosystem.”; and WATERSHED organization of “Protect and enhance our watershed’s ecosystem.” • Protect surface water quality by properly disposing of hazardous materials. Never pour Conservation dangerous goods such as gas, oil or paint down storm drains or in ditches, which go into Report Card 2013 local streams untreated. Ontario. • Test your well water every season to ensure you are drinking quality water. Consider having your well inspected by qualied Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority sta. What Does This Report Card Measure? In order to better understand surface water quality, the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority is updating its Watershed Monitoring Program. This update will evaluate the use and location of • Properly abandon unused water wells. monitoring stations, sampling frequency, and the type of indicators/parameters sampled. Benthic macroinvertebrates will be used in determining stream health based on their level of sensitivity to • Reduce the use of road salt on your own property.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2017
    D Ganaraska Forest Management Plan: 2018 to 2038 (Draft as of June 2017) Page | 1 September 2017 The Ganaraska Forest Management Plan 2018-2038 was written to provide guidance and recommendations for the sustainable use and conservation of the Ganaraska Forest. Recommended management actions are based on scientific data collected as part of a forest inventory, as well as municipal, stakeholder and public input. Further, this Plan satisfies requirements of the Managed Forest Tax Incentive Program (MFTIP) and forms the bases for Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) Certification. The Ganaraska Forest Management Plan 2018-2038 was written by Lawrence Powell, RPF, Madawaska Forestry Inc. under the direction of the Ganaraska Forest Management Plan Steering Committee: Linda Laliberte, CPA, CGA, CAO/Secretary-Treasurer Amy Griffiths, Marketing and Communications Officer Steve McMullen, B.Sc.F., B.Ed. Forest Recreation Technician Fraser Smith, RPF, Forester (2015-2016) Mark Peacock, P.Eng., Director, Watershed Services Technical and information services were provided by GRCA staff: Kim Baldini, Corporate Services Finance Clerk George Elgear, General Superintendent Linda Givelas, Forest Centre Property Manager Pam Lancaster, B.Sc., Stewardship Technician Brian Morrison, B.Sc., Fisheries Biologist Jessica Mueller, PhD, P. Geo. Watershed Hydrogeologist Jeff Moxley, GIS Coordinator Brock Prescott, Forestry Technician Gustav Saurer, M.F.C., Forest Technician Mike Smith, B.Sc., Water Resource Technician Ken Towle, M.E.S., Ecologist Julie Verge, Corporate Services Assistant The Ganaraska Forest Management Plan 2018-2038 is dedicated to Bob Penwell, RPF who devotedly managed the Ganaraska Forest for over 35 years. Correct citation for this document: Powell, Lawrence. 2017. Ganaraska Forest Management Plan 2018-2038.
    [Show full text]
  • Ganaraska River Watershed Plan 2010
    Ganaraska River Watershed Plan 2010 GRCA Board Approval April 15, 2010 Resolution Number FA 15/10 Township of Hamilton The Ganaraska River Watershed Plan was written to provide guidance and recommendations for the conservation, enhancement and sustainable management of the Ganaraska River watershed and its resources. Recommended management actions are based on scientific data presented in the Ganaraska River Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features, as well as municipal, stakeholder and public input. The Ganaraska River Watershed Plan was written by Pam Lancaster, B.Sc., Stewardship Technician and Mark Peacock, P. Eng., Director, Watershed Services with technical assistance from staff of the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA): Brian Morrison, B.Sc., Fisheries Biologist Ken Towle, M.E.S., Ecologist Magdi Widaatalla P.Geo., M.Sc., Manager, Watershed Services Maps were created by the GRCA GIS Department. Brian Curran, B.Sc., GIS Technician Jeff Moxley, Manager GIS/IT Steve Nowak, B.A., GIS Technician Photo Credits: GRCA staff, Sally Walsh and Kris Vande Sompel This document was created for the residents, communities, municipalities and stakeholders of the Ganaraska River watershed. Review and input into this document by the Ganaraska River Technical Review Committee, Ganaraska River Community Advisory Committee, stakeholders and residents occurred through the watershed planning process. Financial support for the Ganaraska River Watershed Plan was provided by the Regional Municipality of Durham and the Municipality of Port Hope. Correct citation for this document: Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 2010. Ganaraska River Watershed Plan. Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. Port Hope, Ontario. The Ganaraska River Watershed Plan was written with review and input from members of the Ganaraska River Technical Review Committee and Ganaraska River Community Advisory Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Ganaraska River Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features
    Ganaraska River Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features for preparation of the Ganaraska River Watershed Plan October 2009 Ganaraska River Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority The Ganaraska River Background Report: Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural Features was written to document the historical and current conditions of the Ganaraska River watershed. This document creates the foundation of the Ganaraska River Watershed Plan. The Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority would like to thank the many seasonal staff that provided field assistance and the landowners who granted permission to collect data from their property. This document was written by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff members Pam Lancaster, B.Sc., Jenny Dai, M.Eng., Brian Morrison, B.Sc., Mark Peacock, P.Eng., Mike Smith, B.Sc., Ken Towle, M.E.S., and Magdi Widaatalla, M.Sc., P.Geo. for the residents, communities, municipalities and stakeholders of the Ganaraska River watershed. Maps were created by the GRCA GIS Department, Brian Curran, B.Sc., Steve Nowak, B.A. and Jeff Moxley. This document complements Richardson (1944) and the 1966 and 1976 Ganaraska Region Conservation Reports (Department of Energy and Resources Management 1966, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources 1976). Certain sections of this report have been summarized from peer reviewed or consultant documents, and review and input into this document by committee members, stakeholders and residents occurred in 2009. The Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority envisions that this document will serve to aid in the conservation, enhancement and sustainable management of the Ganaraska River watershed and its resources. ________________________________________________________________ Correct citation for this document: Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report
    Research Report Summary of Project Findings and Recommendations October 2009 Working together for our future success! Research Report Summary of Project Findings and Recommendations October 2009 Working together for our future success! Northumberland County Premier-ranked Tourist Destination Project – Research Report This Project was funded in partnership with the Ontario Ministry of Training, Colleges & Universities, the Ontario Ministry of Tourism and the Government of Canada. Project facilitated by: Northumberland Economic Development and Tourism 555 Courthouse Road, Cobourg, Ontario, K9A 5J6 (905) 372-3329 or 1-800-354-7050 Northumberland County Premier-ranked Tourist Destination Project – Research Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements...…………………………………………………...………………………………….…4 Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………....6 Premier-Ranked Tourist Destination (PRTD) Background………………………...……………………12 Project Milestones ………………………………………………………………………….….....………….14 Purpose of Premier-Ranked Tourist Destination Framework (PRTDF) in Northumberland County...16 Northumberland County Community Profile…...………..………………………………………………...17 Premier-Ranked Tourist Destination Framework Overview….……………………………………..…...18 Evaluation……………...…………………...………………………………………..……………………….20 Product A. Distinctive Core Attractors…………….…………………………………………….……..24 B. Quality and Critical Mass………..…………………………………………..….…………47 C. Satisfaction and Value……….…………………………………………….…….…………57 D. Accessibility………………..……………………………………..……….……….………..59 E. Accommodations Base………..………………………..……………….………….……..63
    [Show full text]
  • Peterborough Social Planning Council, “Quality of Life Report for City & County of Peterborough: Indicators Vital to Our Community”, 2012
    Quality of Life Report 2015 1 Quality of Life Report Table of Contents (1 of 4) Introduction Section Pages 6-22 What is Quality of Life? ............................................................. Page 6 Credibility of Sources ................................................................ Page 7 Background ............................................................................ Page 8 Evolution of Quality of Life Reporting ............................................ Pages 8-10 Sections of the Report .............................................................. Page 10 Team ................................................................................... Page 11 Contributors to the Report ......................................................... Pages 12-14 Greater Golden Horseshoe .......................................................... Page 15 Population Trends Across Peterborough & Beyond .............................. Pages 16-21 Access to Health (Care) Pages 23-36 Health Profile, December, 2013 ................................................... Pages 24-26 Community Supports ................................................................. Page 27 Cost of Care ........................................................................... Page 28 Long Term Care ...................................................................... Page 29 Central East Community Care Access Centre .................................... Page 30 Peterborough Regional Health Centre ............................................ Pages 31-32 Primary
    [Show full text]
  • Ganaraska Assessment Report - MAP BOOK
    TRENT CONSERVATION COALITION SOURCE PROTECTION REGION Approved Ganaraska Assessment Report - MAP BOOK Volume 2 of 2 Approved October 1, 2014 Amended January 18, 2017 Ganaraska Region Source Protection Area Made possible through the support of the Government of Ontario www.trentsourceprotection.on.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: Introduction o Map 3‐20: Potential Groundwater Discharge o Map 5‐5: Orono Wellhead Protection Areas and o Map 1‐1: Trent Conservation Coalition Source Protection o Map 3‐21: Potential Groundwater Discharge from Vulnerability Scores Region o Map 5‐6: Creighton Heights Managed Lands, Livestock Thermography o Map 1‐2: Ganaraska Region Source Protection Area Density and Total Impervious Surface Area o Map 3‐22: Provincial Groundwater Monitoring Network Wells Map 5‐7: Creighton Heights Areas of Significant, CHAPTER 2: Watershed Characterization Maps o o Map 3‐23: Permitted Water Takings Moderate and Low Drinking Water Threats o Map 2‐1: Source Protection Area Boundary o Map 3‐24: Registered Domestic Wells o Map 5‐8: Camborne Managed Lands, Livestock Density and o Map 2‐2: Watersheds and Subwatershed Areas o Map 3‐25: Municipal Wells and Intakes Total Impervious Surface Area o Map 2‐3: Physiographic Regions o Map 5‐9: Camborne Areas of Significant, Moderate and o Map 2‐4: Areas of Settlement 3.3 Tier 1 Water Budget & Water Quantity Stress Low Drinking Water Threats Assessment o Map 2‐5: Municipal Boundaries o Map 5‐10: Orono Managed Lands, Livestock Density and o Map 2‐6: Population o Maps 3‐26: Tier 1 ‐‐ Water Budget
    [Show full text]
  • The Regional Municipality of Durham Directory
    The Regional Municipality of Durham 2020/2021 Directory Durham Region Table of Contents About Durham Region .........................................................................................................4 Durham Region Map ............................................................................................................5 Durham Regional Council ....................................................................................................6 Regional Municipality of Durham .....................................................................................6 Town of Ajax ....................................................................................................................6 Township of Brock ...........................................................................................................6 Municipality of Clarington ................................................................................................6 City of Oshawa ................................................................................................................7 City of Pickering ..............................................................................................................7 Township of Scugog ........................................................................................................7 Township of Uxbridge ......................................................................................................8 Town of Whitby ................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority 2018
    Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority 2018 ANNUAL REPORT SPECIAL THANKS The GRCA is grateful for its partners in the community, and appreciates the continued support and encouragement. It is important to sustain the connection between a healthy watershed and healthy and strong communities.Thank you to those who continue to support Ganaraska Forest recreational and forest management; especially the volunteer forest patrollers, the Ontario Federation of Trail Riders, the Ganaraska Snowmobile, and Ganaraska Forest Horse Clubs. Thank you to the Ministry of Education for providing three experiential education grants in support of the Ganaraska Forest A YEAR IN REVIEW Centre for the fourth consecutive year; to both Canada Summer Jobs and Parks and Recreation Ontario for supporting seasonal As the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) wraps up staff; to the Capstone Infrastructure Corporation for sponsoring the another year, the Conservation Authority reflects on the continuous Centre’s public events, including Owl Prowl and Under the Stars; growth and prosperity it has experienced. Since its inception in and to the Vanhaverbeke Foundation for their very generous support 1946 as one of Ontario’s earliest Conservation Authorities, the of the education program, with a particular focus on STEM (Science, GRCA has been working with watershed municipalities, government Technology, Engineering and Math) skills development. partners, community members, organized stakeholders, and individual landowners to protect people and property from flooding A special thank you to the dedicated committee members, and erosion, improve water quality, provide advice, and guidance on volunteers, local businesses, organizations, artists and attendees of municipal planning matters, and provide education and recreational the annual fundraiser in support of the Ganaraska Forest Centre opportunities across local watersheds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beautiful Lake: a Bi‐National Biodiversity Conservation Strategy for Lake Ontario
    The Beautiful Lake A Bi‐national Biodiversity Conservation Strategy for Lake Ontario Prepared by the Lake Ontario Bi‐national Biodiversity Conservation Strategy Working Group In cooperation with the U.S. – Canada Lake Ontario Lakewide Management Plan April 2009 ii The name "Ontario" comes from a native word, possibly "Onitariio" or "Kanadario", loosely translated as "beautiful" or "sparkling" water or lake. (Government of Ontario 2008) The Beautiful Lake: A Bi‐national Biodiversity Conservation Strategy for Lake Ontario April 2009 Prepared by: Lake Ontario Biodiversity Strategy Working Group In co‐operation with: U.S. – Canada Lake Ontario Lake‐wide Management Plan Acknowledgements Funding for this initiative was provided by the Great Lakes National Program Office and Region 2 of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Canada‐Ontario Agreement Respecting the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem, The Nature Conservancy and The Nature Conservancy of Canada. This conservation strategy presented in this report reflects the input of over 150 experts representing 53 agencies including Conservation Authorities, universities, and NGOs (see Appendix A.1). In particular, the authors acknowledge the guidance and support of the project Steering Committee: Mark Bain (Cornell University), Gregory Capobianco (New York Department of State), Susan Doka (Department of Fisheries and Oceans), Bonnie Fox (Conservation Ontario), Michael Greer (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers), Frederick Luckey (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), Jim MacKenzie (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources), Mike McMurtry (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources), Joseph Makarewicz (SUNY‐Brockport), Angus McLeod (Parks Canada), Carolyn O’Neill (Environment Canada1), Karen Rodriquez (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) and Tracey Tomajer (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation).
    [Show full text]
  • Ganaraska Region Source Protection Area
    North Bay Golf 9Course 7 & 115 Georgian UV 24 Janetville Bay 9 Roseneath Lake Huron Kingston 97a Township of Otonabee - South Monaghan 18 Ganaraska Region Toronto Lake Ontario 9 COUNTYCOUNTY OFOF PETERBOROUGHPETERBOROUGH Source Protection Area Township of Cavan Monaghan Aquifer Vulnerability 7A 7A 921 Lake9 Erie 9 Millbrook UV115 928 92 Harwood 99 Legend CITYCITY OFOF KAWARTHAKAWARTHA LAKESLAKES Gores Landing " Settlement e ak 35 L Township of Alnwick/Haldimand Road 9 ce Ri Highway Centreton Multi-Lane Highway Bewdley 22 Railway 918 9 Watercourse 915 923 Upper and Single Tier Municipality Garden HillCOUNTYCOUNTY OFOF NORTHUMBERLANDNORTHUMBERLAND Lower Tier Municipality 9 Township of Hamilton 945 9 9 Source Protection Area Boundary Elizabethville Camborne Waterbody 910 9 Baltimore Aquifer Vulnerability Kendal 965 98 High Medium Kirby Municipality of Port Hope 74 Tyrone 9 Grafton Low 35 & 115 VU401 UV 92 Welcome REGIONALREGIONAL MUNICIPALITYMUNICIPALITY OFOF DURHAMDURHAM Town of Cobourg Orono 92 401 2 Municipality of Clarington 918 9 VU 9 Port Hope UV401 942 ± Newtonville 0 1.5 3 6 9 12 Kilometers Trent Conservation Coalition Newcastle rio nta Source Protection Region Bowmanville 2 e O 92 9 VU401 Lak www.trentsourceprotection.on.ca This map has been prepared for the purposes of meeting the Provincial requirements under the Clean Water Act, 2006. If it is proposed to use it for another purpose, it would be advisable to first consult with the responsible Conservation Authority. PRODUCED BY Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority on behalf of the Trent Conservation Coalition Source Protection Committee, August 2010, with data supplied under licence by members of the Ontario Geospatial Data Exchange.
    [Show full text]