DOCSLIB.ORG

Hadejia342016arjass26221.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hadejia342016arjass26221.Pdf Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences 3(4): 1-11, 2017; Article no.ARJASS.26221 ISSN: 2456-4761 Local Capacity Building and Partnership Development for Sustainable Water Resources Management in the Hadejia Jama’are Komadugu Yobe Basin - Lessons from the Activities of HJKYB Trust Fund, Damaturu, Yobe State Isma’ila Abdullahi Hadejia1* and Babagana Boso2 1Hadejia-Jama'are Komadugu-Yobe Basin - Trust Fund, Damaturu, Yobe State, Nigeria. 2Department of Geography, Yobe State University, Damaturu, Yobe State, Nigeria. Authors’ contributions This work was carried out in collaboration between authors IAH and BB. Author IAH designed the study, wrote the protocol and supervised the work. Both authors carried out all field work and performed the statistical analysis. Both authors managed the analyses of the study. Author IAH wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Author BB managed the literature searches and edited the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/ARJASS/2017/26221 Editor(s): (1) David A. Kinnunen, Department of Kinesiology, California State University Fresno, USA. Reviewers: (1) Suvendu Roy, University of Kalyani, India. (2) Francisco Padilla Benítez, Universidad de La Coruña, Spain. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sciencedomain.org/review-history/20407 Received: 5th April 2016 Accepted: 4th May 2016 Case Study Published: 7th August 2017 ABSTRACT This paper examines the endemic and persistent water resources management problems facing the Hadejia Jama’are Komadugu Yobe Basin (HJKYB) and how the problems cripple livelihoods and sustainable water resources management in the basin. It goes on to outline the various efforts dedicated by all range of stakeholders to solving them. The paper further shows that, the creation of the HJKYB Trust Fund as “a child of necessity” is the most celebrated of all the efforts. Therefore it elaborates the achievements of the Trust Fund particularly its infrastructural interventions and the local capacity building activities as well as the economic importance of these activities to the inhabitants of the basin and the nation at large. In the end it brings out some factors that militate against the continued functioning of the HJKYB-TF and suggests measures for ameliorating them. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ *Corresponding author: Email: [email protected]; Hadejia and Boso; ARJASS, 3(4): 1-11, 2017; Article no.ARJASS.26221 Keywords: Capacity; partnership; sustainable; water resources; management. 1. INTRODUCTION estimated need for an additional 15-20% of irrigation water over the next 25 years - which is 1.1 Water Resources Management Issues probably on the low side – serious conflicts are in Nigeria likely to arise between water for irrigated agriculture and water for other human and Water is at the core of sustainable development ecosystem uses. Difficulties will be exacerbated and is critical for socio-economic development, if individual water-short countries strive for food healthy ecosystems and for human survival itself. self sufficiency rather than achieving food It is vital for reducing the global burden of security through trade; by importing food disease and improving the health, welfare and countries can in effect import water from more productivity of populations. generously endowed areas (the concept of “virtual water”) [4]. It is central to the production and preservation of a host of benefits and services for people. Nigeria is considered as having abundant stock of water resources [5]. It is a federal state, and Water is also at the heart of adaptation to climate the management of the river basin and its water change, serving as the crucial link between the and wetland resources fall under the aegis of a climate system, human society and the complicated patchwork of Federal and State environment. Without proper water governance, ministries, parastatals as well as formal and there is likely to be increased competition for traditional rulers [6]. water between sectors and an escalation of water crises of various kinds, triggering For the purpose of effective surface water emergencies in a range of water--‐dependent resource management, Nigeria has been divided sectors [1]. into eight hydrological areas/surface water provinces. The Hydrological areas are drained The world’s freshwater resources are under mainly by the River Niger and River Benue and increasing pressure. Growth in population, their numerous tributaries as well as the Lake increased economic activity and improved Chad and Oguta Lake and the rivers that standards of living lead to increased competition discharge into them [3]. There are other for and conflicts over the limited freshwater important rivers that form part of the hydrological resource. A combination of social inequity, surfaces of Nigeria, these include the Gongola, economic marginalization and lack of poverty Hadejia, Jama’are, Yobe, Komadugu-Gana, alleviation programmes also force people living in Kaduna and Zamfara in the north, and the Ogun, extreme poverty to overexploit soil and forestry Osun, Imo, Cross and Anambra Rivers in the resources, which often results in negative south. The Hadejia Jama’are Komadugu Yobe impacts on water resources. Lack of pollution Basin (HJKYB) is within the hydrological area control measures further degrades water VIII. resources [2]. 2. THE HADEJIA JAMA’ARE KOMADUGU The world population has increased by a factor of th YOBE BASIN (HJKYB) about three during the 20 century whereas water withdrawals have increased by a factor of 2.1 Location and Extent of the Hadejia about seven. It is estimated that currently one Jama’are Komadugu Yobe Basin third of the world’s population live in countries that experience medium to high water stress. (HJKYB) This ratio is expected to grow to two thirds by The HJKYB covers a total area of about 148,000 2025 [3]. 2 km in north east Nigeria (95% of basin area) Population projections indicate that over the next and south east Niger (5%). The basin is drained 25 years food will be required for another 2-3 by two main river sub-systems. The first sub- billion people. Water is increasingly seen as a system, the Yobe River, is formed by the Hadejia key constraint on food production, on a par with, and Jama’are tributaries, which create the if not more crucial than, land scarcity. Irrigated Hadejia Nguru Floodplain at their juncture. The agriculture is already responsible for more than second sub-system is the Komadugu Gana (or 70% of all water withdrawals (more than 90% of Missau) River. Historically, it is a tributary of the all consumptive use of water). Even with an Yobe River, [7]. 2 Hadejia and Boso; ARJASS, 3(4): 1-11, 2017; Article no.ARJASS.26221 Fig. 1. Map of the HJKY Basin The extent of the HJKYB and its river systems 3. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT are shown in Fig. 1 above. PROBLEMS IN THE HADEJIA JAMA’ARE KOMADUGU YOBE BASIN 2.2 Uniqueness of the Basin (HJKYB) 3.1 The Problems The HJKYB is considered to be of strategic national and international importance. It is the Due to the semi-arid conditions of the basin, source of internationally shared water whose scarcity of water has been, and continues to be management in Nigeria has an important bearing the major stimulus of the major development on diplomatic relationships between Nigeria and initiatives. This has placed the integrity of the four countries (Niger, Chad, Cameroon and HJKYB at risk. Presently, substantial proportions Central African Republic). These countries share of the available water sources that can possibly the Lake Chad basin in which the Komadugu be economically exploited have already been Yobe sub-basin is located [8]. The basin is developed or are in the process of being located in a semi-arid region; it is a wetland in developed. The estimated demand for water in dry land, very rich in water resources. It has a the basin by formal users alone stands at about dense concentration of population that is heavily 2.6 times the available water [10]. dependent on its land and water resources. It has a population of about 15 million people that There had been long term failures in the critically and increasingly dependent on its management of the river system driven by dams’ scarce land and water resources for livelihoods. operation failures. The flow of the River Hadejia, The HJKYB is a basin where dependence downstream of Madachi is said to be affected by on the water resources increases due to the upstream dams, the marshes at Madachi and population growth and the water gets less and Nguru and the Nguru Lake. These tend to less. It is the only basin that drains into a lake accentuate the effects of any adverse rather than the Atlantic Ocean. It also houses hydrological changes in the basin. The the Chad Basin National Park within which the contribution of the Hadejia River to the flow of the Dagona Water Fowl Sanctuary is located. The Yobe is reduced so much so that in some years, popular Hadejia-Nguru Wetlands are also within there won’t be any contribution at all. There is the HJKY basin [9]. The Nigerian premier also the history of recurrent farmer/herder conflict Ramsar Site is also within the Hadejia Nguru over the scarce land and water resources of the Wetlands. area [11]. 3 Hadejia and Boso; ARJASS, 3(4): 1-11, 2017; Article no.ARJASS.26221 Failures in the management of land and water basin, stakeholder analysis, biodiversity study as resources led
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ISSN: 2149-6528 2016 Vol. 1, Issue.1 SUSTAINABLE WILDLIFE
    Journal of Tourism and Management Research 101 ISSN:2149-6528 Journal of Tourism and Management Research ISSN: 2149-6528 2016 Vol. 1, Issue.1 SUSTAINABLE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION AT OKOMU NATIONAL PARK, NIGERIA Abstract The purpose of this study is to investigate the various sustainable preservation measures at Okomu National Park, Benin, Nigeria, identify the various challenges of the Park and suggest the way forward. Ethnography was adopted where research methods like key-informant interview, focus-group discussion, field observation, and electronic documentation were used to elicit data from the field. Relevant documentary sources were not left out either. Data gathered were analysed using descriptive and narrative analytical methods. This revealed a range of management measures that were grouped into two main categories (i.e. Educational measures and Technical measures). Major challenges like poaching and community violence were identified, with the major causes arising from host communities. At the end the study made a useful contribution to the sustainable management of parks for ecotourism development, by introducing the HoPSuP Model as a management practice to encourage a healthy host-park relationship in Nigeria and some other developing nations. Keywords: sustainability, wildlife, conservation, national park, challenges, HoPSuP model. _________________________________ Elochukwu A. Nwankwo, PhD. Department of Archaeology and Tourism / University of Nigeria Nsukka. Email: [email protected] Aishat Halilu, M.A. Department of Archaeology and Tourism / University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Email: [email protected] Original Scientific Paper Nwankwo, E.A and Halilu, A. Vol.1/No.1/2016/101-118. DOI:10.26465/ojtmr.2016132258 Journal of Tourism and Management Research 102 1.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH-EAST NIGERIA HUMANITARIAN SITUATION UPDATE Progress on Key Activities from the 2019-2021 Humanitarian Response Strategy
    AID WORKERS ARE #NOTATARGET NORTH-EAST NIGERIA HUMANITARIAN SITUATION UPDATE Progress on key activities from the 2019-2021 Humanitarian Response Strategy JANUARY 2020 EDITION (covering 1 November - 31 December 2019) NORTH-EAST NIGERIA: HUMANITARIAN SITUATION UPDATE | 1 November - 31 December 2019 North-East Nigeria Humanitarian Situation Update, January 2020 Edition - Update on key activities from the 2019-2021 Humanitarian Response Strategy. Reporting period: 1 November - 31 December 2019 Publication date: 14 February 2020 The mission of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) is to coordinate the global emergency response to save lives and protect people in humanitarian crises. We advocate for effective and principled humanitarian action by all, for all. OCHA produces these reports in collaboration with humanitarian partners. This report covers mainly activities that are part of the 2019-2021 Humanitarian Response Strategy (HRP) for Borno, Adamawa and Yobe states in north-east Nigeria. Please note that humanitarian partners monitor their activities through dozens of key performance indicators (KPIs) in addition to those presented here. The KPIs tracked in this report were selected for their significance out of the overall 2019 HRS monitoring framework. For more information, please visit unocha.org/nigeria and reliefweb.int/country/nga. To sign up for our mailing list: bit.ly/NigeriaUpdates. Contacts: Edem Wosornu Peter Ekayu Head of Office, OCHA Nigeria, Abuja Deputy Head of Office, OCHA Nigeria, Maiduguri [email protected] [email protected] +2349037810140 +2349037810095 2 NORTH-EAST NIGERIA: HUMANITARIAN SITUATION UPDATE | 1 November - 31 December 2019 ACCESS BY INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN ORGANISATIONS 3 NORTH-EAST NIGERIA: HUMANITARIAN SITUATION UPDATE | 1 November - 31 December 2019 OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW In the months of November and December, rising insecurity to locations along the Maiduguri – Monguno and Maiduguri – Damaturu road continued to impede the delivery of life-saving aid.
    [Show full text]
  • Gwoza 1917 987 4239 Bama 2143 1026 5250 Mobbar 1212 411
    IDPs DATA S.O.E STATES BORNO, YOBE AND ADAMAWA FROM JANUARY TO MARCH, 2014 TOTAL - 129,624 77,077 37,870 244,070 5,376 249,446 3,161,887 Number of IDPs living Number of Number Of Number of Number of with host IDPs in Total Number Total Affected STATE LGA Affected Children Women Men families Camps of IDPs Population Date of ocuranceNature of Disaster Borno GWOZA 1917 1335 987 4239 4,239 276,568 11/01/2014 INSURGENCY BAMA 2143 2081 1026 5250 5,250 270,119 13/01/2014 INSURGENCY MOBBAR 1212 727 411 2350 2,809 5,159 116,631 24/01/2014 INSURGENCY JERE 891 606 367 1864 1,864 209 24/01/2014 INSURGENCY DAMBOA 97 88 24 209 209 233,200 26/01/2014 INSURGENCY DAMBOA 118 113 38 269 567 836 836 26/01/2014 INSURGENCY DAMBOA 330 287 131 748 748 748 22/01/2014 INSURGENCY KONDUGA 1206 592 313 2111 2,111 157,322 02/02/2014 INSURGENCY BAMA 1511 1007 603 3121 3,121 3,121 05/02/2014 INSURGENCY GWOZA 1723 1215 805 3743 3,743 3,743 13/02/2014 INSURGENCY KONDUGA 2343 2099 1036 5478 5,478 5,478 14/02/2014 INSURGENCY DAMBOA 65 67 30 162 162 162 14/02/2014 INSURGENCY GWOZA 4403 2423 1309 8135 8,135 8,135 19/02/2014 INSURGENCY BAMA 2398 1804 911 5113 5,113 5,113 20/02/2014 INSURGENCY MMC 2289 1802 900 4991 4,991 4,991 01/03/2014 INSURGENCY KAGA 1201 582 303 2086 2,086 89,996 01/03/2014 INSURGENCY MAFA 2015 913 568 3496 3,496 3,496 02/03/2014 INSURGENCY KONDUGA 1428 838 513 2779 2,779 2,779 03/03/2014 INSURGENCY DAMBOA 2437 2055 1500 5992 5,992 5,992 04/03/2014 INSURGENCY DAMBOA 170 133 57 360 360 360 05/03/2014 INSURGENCY DAMBOA 406 343 211 960 960 960 06/03/2014
    [Show full text]
  • National Park Service Act
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1 Establishment of the National Park Service of Nigeria and its Governing Board, etc. SECTION I. Establishment of the National Park Service. 2. Establishment and Composition of the National Park Service Governing Board. 3. Tenure of office of member. 4. Removal from office, etc. 5. Allowances of members. PART II Objectives, functions and powers 6. Objecti ves of the Service. 7. Functions of the Service. 8. Powers of the Service. PART Ill Staff of the Service 9. Conservator-General of the National Park Service. 10. Secretary and other staff. II. Application of the Pensions Act. 12. Fund of the Service. 13. Accounts, audit, and estimate. 14. Annual report. 15. Power to borrow. 16. Power to invest. 17. Power to accept gifts. PART IV Establishment, management, etc., of National Parks 18. Establishment of National Parks. 19. Procedure for establishing or altering the boundaries of National Parks. 20. Ownership of wild animals. Establishment, composition, etc., of National Parks Management Committee, etc. 21. Establishment of National Park Management Committees. 22. Functions of the Management Committees. SECTION 23. Powers of Management Committees. 24. Directors of National Parks. PART V Management principles, etc., of National Parks 25. Management of National Parks to be based on prescribed management principles. 26. Management principles of the National Park. 27. Management plan for the National Park. 28. System plan. PARTVI Offences and penalties 29. Restriction on entry into National Parks, etc. 30. Restriction on hunting, etc., in the National Parks. 31. Restriction on weapons, etc., in the National Parks. 32. Prohibition of introduction of wild animals into National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • FAO WWT WI Waterbird Capture and Avian Influenza Surveillance Training Course
    FAO WWT WI Waterbird Capture and Avian Influenza Surveillance Training Course held at Dagona, Chad Basin National Park, Yobe State, Nigeria 26th October - 13th November 2009 Report to Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Report from Ruth Cromie1, Richard Hearn1, David Paynter1 & Nicolas Tubbs2 1Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge, Gloucestershire GL2 7BT, UK 2Wetlands International, PO Box 471, 6700 AL Wageningen, The Netherlands December 2009 Contents SUMMARY 2 1 BACKGROUND 3 2 THE COURSE 5 2.1 Aim of the course 5 2.2 Location 5 2.3 Timing 5 2.4 Participants 5 2.4.1 Participant Specification 6 2.4.2 Selection Process 6 2.5 Trainers 8 2.6 Facilities 8 2.7 Accommodation 8 2.8 Food 8 2.9 Daily subsistence allowance (DSA) 8 2.10 Travel and transport 8 2.11 Language 9 2.12 Course structure 9 2.13 Course content 9 2.14 Trapping and avian influenza surveillance equipment 10 2.15 Capture techniques demonstrated and practiced in the field 10 2.16 Avian influenza sampling 12 2.17 Numbers and species of birds captured and sampled caught during the course 13 2.18 Health and safety 13 2.19 Animal welfare 13 2.20 Teaching resources 13 2.21 Certificate of attendance 14 2.22 Feedback and course outcomes 14 2.22.1 Administration and facilities 14 2.22.2 The training 15 2.22.3 Future needs 16 2.23 Debrief meetings 16 2.24 Issues arising 16 2.24.1 Equipment and field guides 16 2.24.2 Organisation of transport prior to the course 16 2.24.3 Number of participants 16 2.24.4 Numbers of birds caught 17 2.24.5 DSA 17 3 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 18 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 19 5 REFERENCES 20 APPENDIX 1 SELECTION CRITERIA FOR PARTICIPANTS 21 APPENDIX 2.
    [Show full text]
  • (16) Ui Inpro Amusa Forest 2017.Pdf
    398 39th Annual Conference of Forestry Association of Nigeria (FAN) FORESTS AND NATIONAL SECURITY IN NIGERIA: AN EVALUATION OF THE SYMBIOSIS AND CHALLENGES Amusa, T.O.,*1 Bada, S.O.1 and Azeez, I.O.2 1Department of Forest Resources Management, University of Ilorin, Nigeria 2Department of Forest Resources Management, University of Ibadan, Nigeria Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract Forests play many diverse and multifaceted roles in our life. However, there is an emerging nexus between forest and national security in many countries, especially within the sub-Saharan region of Africa. Contrary to the noble objectives for which they were constituted, many forest reserves have become a source of security concern both at the local and national scale. In the light of this, we examined the relationship between forest and national security in Nigeria, with a view to identifying how forests impact security situations and how security situations in turn impact forests, and what need to be done to mitigate the negative upshots along the continuum. It is noted that the management of forests and other protected areas in the country has been quite fortuitous. The laws and policies associated with forest and protected area management are obsolete while the supervision, monitoring and surveillance carried out in the forest areas leave much to be desired. Given the shared features between forest locations and the geography of violent conflicts, it is observed that forests can provide refuge, funds and food for insurgents and terrorists. In turn, armed conflicts and activities also negatively impact the forest through “ecocide” (the destruction of the environment by military operations), hunting wildlife for food, and setting of land mines that kill and maim many wildlife species.
    [Show full text]
  • (ETT) Report No.113
    DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX - Nigeria DTM Nigeria EMERGENCY TRACKING TOOL (ETT) DTM Emergency Tracking Tool (ETT) is deployed to track and provide up-to-date information on sudden displacement and other population movements ETT Report: No. 113 | 01 - 07 April 2019 Movements New Arrival Screening by Nutri�on Partners Arrivals: Children (6-59 months) Abadam screened for malnutri�on 2,550 individuals 354 Niger Mobbar Lake Chad Departures: MUAC category of screened children 343 individuals Green: 319 Yellow: 30 Red: 5 184 Kukawa Within the period of 01 - 09 April 2019, a total of 2,893 movements were Guzamala recorded, including 2,550 arrivals and 343 departures. Arrivals were recorded Gubio Monguno at loca�ons in Askira/Uba, Bama, Biu, Dikwa, Gwoza, Jere, Konduga, Mafa, Nganzai Maiduguri, Mobbar and Ngala Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Borno state Marte Borno Ngala and loca�ons in Demsa, Fufore, Girei, Gombi, Lamurde, Madagali, Maiha, Magumeri Jere Mayo Belwa, Michika, Mubi North, Mubi South, Numan and Yola South LGAs Mafa 151 Kala/Balge Maiduguri 10 Dikwa of Adamawa state. Departures were recorded at Askira/Uba and Chibok LGAs 317 74 of Borno state, Demsa, Fufore, Girei, Hong, Maiha, Michika and Numan LGAs 270 Bama of Adamawa state. Bama Kaga Konduga ETT assessments iden�fied the following movement triggers: voluntary 110 560 reloca�on (38%), improved security (11%), fear of a�ack (4%), military Gwoza opera�on (20%) and poor living condi�ons (27%). Damboa 349 Number of individuals by movement triggers Cameroon 4 Chibok Biu 63 Madagali
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria – Complex Emergency JUNE 7, 2021
    Fact Sheet #3 Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Nigeria – Complex Emergency JUNE 7, 2021 SITUATION AT A GLANCE 206 8.7 2.9 308,000 12.8 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION Estimated Estimated Number of Estimated Estimated Projected Acutely Population People in Need in Number of IDPs Number of Food-Insecure w of Nigeria Northeast Nigeria in Nigeria Nigerian Refugees Population for 2021 in West Africa Lean Season UN – December 2020 UN – February 2021 UNHCR – February 2021 UNHCR – April 2021 CH – March 2021 Major OAG attacks on population centers in northeastern Nigeria—including Borno State’s Damasak town and Yobe State’s Geidam town—have displaced hundreds of thousands of people since late March. Intercommunal violence and OCG activity continue to drive displacement and exacerbate needs in northwest Nigeria. Approximately 12.8 million people will require emergency food assistance during the June-to-August lean season, representing a significant deterioration of food security in Nigeria compared with 2020. 1 TOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENT HUMANITARIAN FUNDING USAID/BHA $230,973,400 For the Nigeria Response in FY 2021 State/PRM2 $13,500,000 For complete funding breakdown with partners, see detailed chart on page 7 Total $244,473,400 1 USAID’s Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance (USAID/BHA) 2 U.S. Department of State Bureau for Population, Refugees, and Migration (State/PRM) 1 KEY DEVELOPMENTS Violence Drives Displacement and Constrains Access in the Northeast Organized armed group (OAG) attacks in Adamawa, Borno, and Yobe states have displaced more than 200,000 people since March and continue to exacerbate humanitarian needs and limit relief efforts, according to the UN.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Diversity and Abundance of Wild Birds in Dagona-Waterfowl Sanctuary Borno State, Nigeria
    African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Vol. 5(10), pp. 855-866, October 2011 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJEST ISSN 1996-0786 ©2011 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Species diversity and abundance of wild birds in Dagona-Waterfowl Sanctuary Borno State, Nigeria Lameed, G. A. Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]. Accepted 13 July, 2011 The study of bird species diversity and richness in Dagona-Waterfowl sanctuary was carried out in early wet and late dry seasons. This was to provide some information on the wild birds of the sanctuary. Dagona sanctuary is located within the Bade-Nguru wetland sector; it is one of the important bird areas strategized for the conservation of avifauna species in Sub-Sahara region, Nigeria. Line transect method was used to carry out birds’ survey at three different lake sites, namely: Gatsu (Site:1), Mariam (Site: 2) and Oxbow (Site: 3). The data were analyzed with the Kolmogorov- Smirnov test to determine the distribution level of the birds. The birds’ diversity was assessed using Shannon-Weiner diversity index. The results showed that bird species diversity was not equally distributed in the sites Site 2 had the highest diversity with an index of 2.74 compared to Site 1 with 1.84 and Site 3 with 1.62. Likewise, bird species diversity in the area was normally distributed birds’ abundance were significantly different (P<0.05) among the three sites. Site 1 had the highest number of bird (16.36) compared to Site 2 (14.32) and site 3 (11.51).
    [Show full text]
  • An Appraisal of Environmental Interpretive Policies and Strategies of Nigeria National Parks
    Tropical Agricultural Research & Extension 12(1):2009 AN APPRAISAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL INTERPRETIVE POLICIES AND STRATEGIES OF NIGERIA NATIONAL PARKS AA Ogunjinmi1*, LO Ojo2, SA Onadeko3 and O Oguntoke2 1Department of Wildlife and Environmental Resources Management, College of Agriculture, Osun State Uni- versity, P.M.B. 4014, Ejigbo, Osun State, Nigeria 2Department of Environmental Management and Toxicology, University of Agriculture, P.M.B. 2240, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria 3Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, University of Agriculture, P.M.B. 2240, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria Accepted: 15th May 2009 ABSTRACT This research was carried out to appraise the environmental interpretive policies and strategies of Nige- ria National Parks. Four National Parks-Chad Basin National Parks (CBNP), Kainji Lake National Park (KLNP), Okomu National Park (OKNP) and Yankari National Park (YNP, now Yankari Game Reserve) representing the major ecological zones of Nigeria were selected for the study. Data were col- lected from the management of the Parks through interview guide adapted from the Department of Natural Resources and Environment and Parks, Victoria, Australia; these were analysed by using de- scriptive statistics. The study revealed that the business structure for these parks is public service model and that they have legislated responsibility for providing information and education and considered interpretation to be of central importance to their operations; although they have varying levels of im- portance attached to various interpretation/interpretive functions. Interpretive policies and strategies adopted by the parks include management policy, education policy and strategy, management plans, action plans, guidelines and manuals. Key audiences considered for interpretive services were visitors from schools, first–time visitors, park neighbours, tertiary institutions, overseas visitors and special in- terest groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria Giraffe Conservation Status Report January 2021
    Country Profile Federal Republic of Nigeria Giraffe Conservation Status Report January 2021 General statistics Size of country: 923,768 km² Size of protected areas / percentage protected area coverage: 124,403 km2/13.9% Species and subspecies In 2016 the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) completed the first detailed assessment of the conservation status of giraffe, revealing that their numbers are in peril. This was further emphasised when the majority of the IUCN recognised subspecies where assessed in 2018 – some as Critically Endangered. While this update further confirms the real threat to one of Africa’s most charismatic megafauna, it also highlights a rather confusing aspect of giraffe conservation: how many species/subspecies of giraffe are there? The IUCN currently recognises one species (Giraffa camelopardalis) and nine subspecies of giraffe (Muller et al. 2018) historically based on outdated assessments of their morphological features and geographic ranges. The subspecies are thus divided: Angolan giraffe (G. c. angolensis), Kordofan giraffe (G. c. antiquorum), Masai giraffe (G. c. tippelskirchi), Nubian giraffe (G. c. camelopardalis), reticulated giraffe (G. c. reticulata), Rothschild’s giraffe (G. c. rothschildi), South African giraffe (G. c. giraffa), Thornicroft’s giraffe (G. c. thornicrofti) and West African giraffe (G. c. peralta). However, GCF together with their partner Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F) have performed the first-ever comprehensive DNA sampling and analysis (genomic, nuclear and mitochondrial) of all major natural populations of giraffe throughout their range in Africa. As a result, an update of the traditional taxonomy now exists. This study revealed that there are four species of giraffe and likely six subspecies (Fennessy et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Procurement Plan
    PROCUREMENT PLAN (Textual Part) Project information: Country: Nigeria Public Disclosure Authorized Project Name: Multi-Sectoral Crisis Recovery Project for North East Nigeria (MCRP) P- Number: P157891 Project Implementation Agency: MCRP PCU (Federal and States) Date of the Procurement Plan: Updated -December 22, 2017. Period covered by this Procurement Plan: From 01/12/2018 – 30/06/2019. Public Disclosure Authorized Preamble In accordance with paragraph 5.9 of the “World Bank Procurement Regulations for IPF Borrowers” (July 2016) (“Procurement Regulations”) the Bank’s Systematic Tracking and Exchanges in Procurement (STEP) system will be used to prepare, clear and update Procurement Plans and conduct all procurement transactions for the Project. This textual part along with the Procurement Plan tables in STEP constitute the Procurement Plan for the Project. The following conditions apply to all procurement activities in the Procurement Plan. The other elements of the Procurement Plan as required under paragraph 4.4 of the Procurement Regulations are set forth in STEP. Public Disclosure Authorized The Bank’s Standard Procurement Documents: shall be used for all contracts subject to international competitive procurement and those contracts as specified in the Procurement Plan tables in STEP. National Procurement Arrangements: In accordance with paragraph 5.3 of the Procurement Regulations, when approaching the national market (as specified in the Procurement Plan tables in STEP), the country’s own procurement procedures may be used. When the Borrower uses its own national open competitive procurement arrangements as set forth in the FGN Public Procurement Act 2007; such arrangements shall be subject to paragraph 5.4 of the Procurement Regulations.
    [Show full text]