Ohio River Navigation, 1783-1824 21

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ohio River Navigation, 1783-1824 21 OHIO RIVER NAVIGATION, 1783-1824 21 CHAPTER . II : OHIO RIVER NAVIGATION, 1783-1824 No history of the activities of the Corps veloped, obstructions to navigation, be- of Engineers in the Ohio River Valley cause of resultant delays and losses of could be complete without a review of the boats and their cargoes, became more ob- historic development of waterways navi- jectionable. gation and waterborne commerce in the The navigability of Ohio Valley water- valley, for the major continuing mission of ways, before 1824 the principal outlet to the Louisville Engineer District and its market, was a matter of great personal predecessors has been the improvement concern to the early settlers . In its natural of waterways as a benefit to navigation . condition, the Ohio River had a Congress first assigned the improvement constantly changing channel . Annual of inland rivers to the Corps in 1824, but floods shifted the location of sand and officers of the Corps, during the perfor- gravel bars, created and destroyed islands, mance of their military missions in the cut new channels and filled old, under- Ohio Valley, often reported the condition mined banks and toppled entire trees into of the unimproved waterways and de- the stream. The river was alternately calm scribed the character of the waterborne and tumultuous, wildly fluctuating from commerce prior to 1824 . And one of them, one foot deep at extreme low water up to Major Stephen H . Long, made significant eighty feet at record flood stages . In 1838 contributions to the design of the western the entire flow of the river just below inland river steamboat . Before recounting Pittsburgh was measured at 1400 cubic the history of the improvement of the feet per second (cfs); at the crest of the Ohio River for navigation, a review of the 1937 flood about 900,000 cfs poured past development of navigation on the Ohio Cincinnati into Louisville . From its head River prior to 1824 is in order . at Pittsburgh to its mouth at Cairo, the Ohio ran down a slope with a total fall of Condition of the Ohio River Prior to 429.4 feet, but the fall was not uniformly Improvement distributed . Long pools with a negligible Early descriptions of the Ohio River fall alternated with "riffles," or rapids, emphasized its navigability, often stating where the gradient was steep ; more than that no serious problems were met in twenty feet at the worst place - the Falls traveling the river except at the Falls . It of the Ohio . The natural condition of the was, however, not quite as simple as de- tributaries of the Ohio River was generally scribed, for early navigators used light- no better, if not worse, for navigation than draft canoes, dugouts, skiffs, and bateaux that of the Ohio, and traffic originating on and did not consider grounding on a bar a tributary streams ordinarily used a portion serious mishap . Navigators of a later of the Ohio on its way to port cities and period, who used deeper-draft vessels, markets .' were to continually complain of shallow Though a water stage of a mere three channels, shifting bars, hazardous rocks feet was considered navigable by early and snags, and similar obstructions . As the rivermen, this depth was not available on Ohio Valley was settled and extensive use the Ohio for several months each year . of the rivers for marketing agricultural Low-water stages usually prevailed in the produce and manufactured goods de- Ohio Basin from July through October; 22 THE FALLS CITY ENGINEERS during that season only the shallowest- merely a large sturdily-constructed draft vessels operated, and they often wooden box, has been well described as were delayed by teams and wagons ford- the "ark of empire ." Major Jonathan Wil- ing the river at many points. Until rail- liams, Corps of Engineers, traveled in roads crisscrossed the region in the mid- them down the Ohio in 1801 and de- nineteenth century, business practically scribed them as resembling a "floating came to a halt during low-water seasons, house ." In 1802 another traveler de- manufacturers laid off their employees, scribed them more fully : and a mini-recession set in, lasting until They are of a square form, some longer than the river rose. Rivermen and shippers others ; their sides are raised four feet and a half came to rely on two rises : the fall rise above water; their length is from fifteen to fifty which occurred in late October or feet; the two extremities are square, upon one of which is a kind of awning, under which the pas- November, and, after an interval of severe sengers shelter themselves when it rains .4 weather and ice conditions, the spring rise in February, March, or April . During such The flatboat was first used on the Ohio stages, the Ohio Valley waterways teemed River before the end of the Revolution, with vessels transporting commodities to and during the decade after the Revolu- down-river markets, and, later, to up-river tion it became the favorite vessel of the ports via keelboat and steamboat .2 immigrants . Pioneers crossed the moun- Agricultural enterprise has always been tains to the Upper Ohio Valley and pur- seasonal ; its success intimately connected chased or built flatboats to continue the with the amount and timing of precipita- journey to their new homesteads . The tion. As long as Ohio Valley mercantile watercraft used by the Indians were too and manufacturing concerns relied chiefly unstable and limited in capacity to trans- upon the unimproved waterways for port a family and their possessions; the transportation of raw materials and salable ribbed and planked bateau of the French products, their success was also depen- was relatively complex of construction ; dent upon the amount and timing of pre- hence, the flatboat was evolved to meet cipitation . If the fall rise was delayed, or the need for a large, stable vessel of sim- did not occur at all as happened in 1819, a ple construction . In addition 'to economic transportation crisis developed and transportation, flatboats . were also useful economic consequences were serious . at the end of the voyage, for their lumber The unpredictable Ohio River continually could be used in constructing new homes . disrupted business affairs and community The business of constructing these vessels life as long as alternate commercial routes for sale to the tide of immigrants reached were unavailable; however, transportation major proportions in the Upper Ohio Val- costs via the unimproved waterways as ley in the late eighteenth century . Two to compared with the existing overland three hundred families annually em- facilities were so much lower that the un- barked on the Monongahela at reliable channels of the Ohio River and its Brownsville for the down river trip, and tributaries were used almost exclusively there is record of 1200 immigrants board- by commerce until about 1850 .3 ing flatboats at Olean, New York, after the ice broke in 1815 to descend the Al- Flatboats and the Great Immigration legheny and Ohio rivers to new homes in The Ohio River flatboat, originally the Lower Ohio Basin . In 1788, the peak OHIO RIVER NAVIGATION, 1783-1824 23 I-a 24 THE FALLS CITY ENGINEERS year of the great immigration, at least 308 the Ohio Valley to New Orleans via the flatboats, transporting over 6,000 immi- waterways began before the Revolution . grants, about 3,000 head of livestock, and As early as 1763, eighty thousand dollars 150 wagons passed down the Ohio on the worth of animal skins and tallow valued at spring rise .5 four thousand dollars arrived at New Or- Flatboats depended on the current for leans from up river, and part doubtless motive power, and there was no turning came from the Ohio Valley where French back once embarked, for upstream naviga- and Spanish hunters were operating . It tion in such unwieldy craft required ef- will be recalled that Baynton, Wharton, forts which almost exceeded human capa- and Morgan of Philadelphia entered the bility. They were steered with long oars, Indian trade and am y supply business on or sweeps, but keeping in the unim- the Ohio in 1765; other similar mercantile proved, constantly changing river channel firms were also active at about the same was quite a challenge . Boats often time. During the course of the Revolution grounded on bars, wrecked on projecting there was also some limited traffic, both rocks, or were pierced by snags, and in the up and down the Ohio, in munitions and early days of the traffic the threat of Indian military supplies for the forces com- attack was always present . Captain Wil- manded by George Rogers Clark and liam Tell Poussin, a Frenchman who be- other military units in the Ohio Valley .' came an officer in the United States Top- Jacob Yoder of Pennsylvania, and later ographical Engineers, traveled the Ohio Spencer County, Kentucky, has been River in flatboats on various missions be- credited with performing the first flatboat fore 1825 . He later recalled : trip down the Ohio and MIssissippi to sell In descending the Ohio and the Mississippi . agricultural produce at New Orleans in it was customary to purchase and freight a flat May, 1782 . This may be true, but there boat. Embarking on this, it was necessary to trust exists fuller evidence for the trip of the to the strength of the current to convey you to your destination. This was certainly not a very ex- Tardiveau brothers . At the encouragement peditious method of traveling, especially when of Benjamin Franklin and perhaps your only resource besides the current was the Jonathan Williams, Barthelemi and Pierre occasional use of the oar or the sail .
Recommended publications
  • History of Navigation on the Yellowstone River
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1950 History of navigation on the Yellowstone River John Gordon MacDonald The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation MacDonald, John Gordon, "History of navigation on the Yellowstone River" (1950). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 2565. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/2565 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HISTORY of NAVIGATION ON THE YELLOWoTGriE RIVER by John G, ^acUonald______ Ë.À., Jamestown College, 1937 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Mas­ ter of Arts. Montana State University 1950 Approved: Q cxajJL 0. Chaiinmaban of Board of Examiners auaue ocnool UMI Number: EP36086 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Ois8<irtatk>n PuUishing UMI EP36086 Published by ProQuest LLC (2012). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana Folk Boats by Malcolm Comeaux Malcolm Comeaux Received His Ph.D
    Louisiana Folk Boats by Malcolm Comeaux Malcolm Comeaux received his Ph.D. in Folk boats are those small craft made by their users or by local boat­ geographyfrom Louisiana State University in 1969. He is currently a professor ofgeogra­ builders who learned their construction techniques from an older gen­ phy at Arizona State University in Tempe. eration. Hundreds of folk boats are built each year without blueprints He has conducted extensive field research or plans in backyards and small boatyards scattered throughout south on the development offishing systems in in­ land waters, particularly in the Mississippi Louisiana, where this tradition remains an important part of every- River System and in the Atchafalaya Swamp day life. It is not a folk tradition that depends upon sales to tourists; ofLouisiana. rather it survives simply because many require small boats for their livelihood. Boats are found throughout the state, although in north Louisiana there was never a strong folk boat tradition, for the area was settled by Anglo southerners who had little need for boats. In south Louisiana, however, where there was always a close relationship between man and water, boat traditions survive because the craft are needed to exploit marine environments. Coastal regions, as well as lakes, bayous and swamps, are rich in resources, producing fish, crawfish, frogs, fur­ Plank pirogue used in Atchafalaya Basin. bearing animals, Spanish moss, crabs, shrimp, alligators, and the like. Photo courtesy Louisiana Office of Tourism To harvest these resources, boats are needed- not just any boats, but 22 ones designed to fit various ecological conditions and accomplish Building a Lafitte skiff in the backyard of a south Louisiana home.
    [Show full text]
  • OHIO VALLEY HISTORY Volume 4, Number 3, Fall 2004
    1 OHIO VALLEY HISTORY Volume 4, Number 3, Fall 2004 A Journal of the History and Culture of the Ohio Valley and the Upper South, published in Cincinnati, Ohio, and Louisville, Kentucky, by Cincinnati Museum Center and The Filson Historical Society, Inc. Contents The Art of Survival: Moravian Indians and Economic Adaptation in the Old Northwest, 1767-1808 Maia Conrad 3 “Fairly launched on my voyage of discovery”: Meriwether Lewis’s Expedition Letters to James Findlay Edited by James J. Holmberg 19 Space and Place on the Early American Frontier: The Ohio Valley as a Region, 1790-1850 Kim M. Gruenwald 31 Henry Bellows Interviews Hiram Powers Edited by Kelly F. Wright 49 Cincinnati in 1800. Lithograph by Reviews 79 Strobridge Lithograph Co. from painting by Announcements 92 A.]. Swing. Cincinnati Museum Center, Cincinnati Historical Society Library FALL 2004 3 Contributors MAIACONRAD is an independent scholar. She received her Ph.D. in History from The College of William and Mary. JAMESJ. HOLMBERGis Curator of Special Collections at The Filson Historical Society. He is the author of Dear Brother: Letters of William Clark to Jonathan Clark (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002). KIM M. GRUENWALDis Associate Professor of History at Kent State University. She is the author of River of Enterprise: The Commercial Origins of Regional Identity in the Ohio Valley, 1790-1850 (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2002). KELLYF. WRIGHTis a Ph.D. candidate in History at the University of Cincinnati. 2 OHIO VALLEY HISTORY Space and Place on the Earlv American Frontier: The Ohid Valley as a Region, 1790-1850 KIM M.
    [Show full text]
  • Hog Chains and Mark Twains: a Study of Labor History, Archaeology, and Industrial Ethnography of the Steamboat Era of the Monongahela Valley 1811-1950
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports - Open Reports 2014 HOG CHAINS AND MARK TWAINS: A STUDY OF LABOR HISTORY, ARCHAEOLOGY, AND INDUSTRIAL ETHNOGRAPHY OF THE STEAMBOAT ERA OF THE MONONGAHELA VALLEY 1811-1950 Marc Nicholas Henshaw Michigan Technological University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Copyright 2014 Marc Nicholas Henshaw Recommended Citation Henshaw, Marc Nicholas, "HOG CHAINS AND MARK TWAINS: A STUDY OF LABOR HISTORY, ARCHAEOLOGY, AND INDUSTRIAL ETHNOGRAPHY OF THE STEAMBOAT ERA OF THE MONONGAHELA VALLEY 1811-1950", Dissertation, Michigan Technological University, 2014. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etds/790 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons HOG CHAINS AND MARK TWAINS: A STUDY OF LABOR HISTORY, ARCHAEOLOGY, AND INDUSTRIAL ETHNOGRAPHY OF THE STEAMBOAT ERA OF THE MONONGAHELA VALLEY 1811-1950 By Marc Nicholas Henshaw A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In Industrial Heritage and Archeology MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2014 This dissertation has been approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Industrial Heritage and Archeology Department of Social Sciences Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Susan Martin Committee Member: Dr. Hugh Gorman Committee Member: Dr. Carol MacLennan Committee Member: Dr. John Nass Department Chair: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Jamison Cv 2017
    Philip A. Jamison 53 Mount Olive Church Road Asheville, North Carolina 28804 828-258-8473; 828-450-0780 [email protected] www.philjamison.com EDUCATION Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina Master of Arts, Appalachian Studies August 2007 Thesis: The Southern Appalachian Square Dance: African-American Influence on European-American Dance in Appalachia Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, North Carolina Master of Science, Applied Mathematics May 1994 University of North Carolina, Asheville, North Carolina North Carolina Teacher Certification, Physics & Mathematics (9–12) December 1988 Hamilton College, Clinton, New York Bachelor of Arts, Physics May 1976 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE August 1994 – Professor of Mathematics, Appalachian Music, and Appalachian present Studies Warren Wilson College, Asheville, North Carolina • Courses taught: Statistics, Statistics for the Natural Sciences, Pre-Calculus, Calculus I, Calculus II, Mathematics for the Liberal Arts, Introduction to Appalachian Studies, First Year Seminar, Appalachian Music and Dance, Appalachian Ballads and Folksongs, Old-Time Fiddle I, Old-Time Fiddle II, Appalachian Stringband, Old-Time Stringband Ensemble, Appalachian Flatfooting and Clogging, Appalachian Square Dance, Applied Traditional Music (fiddle, banjo), Independent Studies (fiddle, banjo, step dance, Americana band) August 1994 – Adjunct Professor of Mathematics May 1996 University of North Carolina, Asheville, North Carolina • Courses taught: Statistics, College Algebra August 1989 – Mathematics and
    [Show full text]
  • Pittsburgh Urban Waterfront : 1872-1926
    Pittsburgh Urban Waterfront : 1872-1926 History Report: Phase 5 - 2004 Pittsburgh Urban Waterfront : 1872-1926 History Report: Phase 5 - 2004 Priya Krishna GIS Coordinator 3 Rivers 2ND Nature Editors: Tim Collins & Reiko Goto Studio for Creative Inquiry Press In Association with Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA, USA Authors: Priya Krishna GIS Design: Priya Krishna Advisor: Dr. Joel Tarr Editors: Editors: Timothy Collins and Noel Hefele Layout design: 3 Rivers 2nd Nature For more information on work done by 3 Rivers 2nd Nature, call 412.268.3673 or visit http://3r2n.cfa.cmu.edu Copyright © 2004 STUDIO for Creative Inquiry All rights reserved First Edition STUDIO for Creative Inquiry Room 111, CFA Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 www.cmu.edu/studio Contents I. Introduction 7 II. Theoretical Background 7 Literature Survey Evolving the Theoretical Framework Overview of Functional Theories Primary Theoretical Framework and Analytical Framework Tools of Analysis III. Analysis: Pittsburgh Waterfront 1872 - 1925 11 Optimum Location Agglomeration Qualities of Space Summary of Trends Observed IV.Conclusions 33 Footnotes 38 Figures 39 Pittsburgh Urban Waterfront: 1872-1926 I. Introduction Gargantuan factories came to dominate the entire II. Theoretical Background Lewis Mumford, writer, scholar, and architectural waterfront, cutting off public access to the three rivers. historian illuminates the growth of the city and its Photographs of the contemporary Pittsburgh waterfront This lack of access persists in the postindustrial city As the study began, the fi rst two directions for inquiry historical origins over a period of 1,000 years in reveal a montage of built and natural elements. Lush shaping the relation or the lack thereof, between people were the city itself and its most defi ning identity as an his book.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Succession in Eastern French Louisiana. William Bernard Knipmeyer Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1956 Settlement Succession in Eastern French Louisiana. William Bernard Knipmeyer Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Knipmeyer, William Bernard, "Settlement Succession in Eastern French Louisiana." (1956). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 172. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/172 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SETTLEMENT SUCCESSION IN EASTERN FRENCH LOUISIANA A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department~of Geography and Anthropology by-. William B* Knipmeyer B. S., Louisiana State University, 1947 August, 1956 ACKNOWLEDGMENT Field investigations for a period of three months were accomplished as a part of the Office of Naval Research Project N 7 ONR 35606, under the direction of Prof. Fred B. Kniffen, Head of the Department of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University. Sincere appreciation is acknowledged for the guidance and assistance of Prof. Kniffen. Information pertaining to similar problems in other parts of the state was generously given by Martin Wright and James W. Taylor. The manuscript was critically read by Professors Robert C. West, William G. Haag, and John II.
    [Show full text]
  • Wheeling and Pittsburgh in the Nineteenth Century
    Urban Rivalry in the Upper Ohio Valley: Wheeling and Pittsburgh in the Nineteenth Century HE HISTORICAL EXAMINATION OF URBAN COMPETITION for trade and commerce has frequently focused on such important eastern Tcities as Philadelphia, Baltimore, and New York. These urban giants established their preeminence in America's colonial era, but continued to bicker as new forms of transportation, first the canal, then the railroad, offered economic advantages to the city that secured new improvements. Yet at the turn of the nineteenth century new cities in the West were just beginning their struggle for urban hegemony, and their rivalries took on a different cast as the cities grew up with the market revolution and the transportation technologies that became vivid signals for a growing nation. Western urban growth was tied to trade and the initial agent of that commercial development was the Ohio River. Flowing west from its origins at Pittsburgh, the Ohio River fueled the growth of that city and sparked a secondary round of urban competition with downstream rivals at Cincinnati and Louisville. In his classic study of urban development, historian Richard Wade noted that "before a city could hope to enter the urban sweepstake for the largest prize, it had to eliminate whatever rivals arose in its own area." In some local regions the battle was uneven and the weaker town was quickly eliminated. Louisville annexed nearby Shippingsport and Portland to eliminate their competition. Pittsburgh had similar motives in moving to annex Allegheny. Farther west, the rapid growth of St. Louis quickly dashed the THE PENNSYLVANIA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAVEL in INDIANA LONG AGO – PART II RIVER BOATS Pioneer
    TRAVEL IN INDIANA LONG AGO – PART II RIVER BOATS Pioneer families, with their household furniture and sometimes with a few cows, hogs, and chickens, floated down the Ohio River on flatboats to find new homes in Indiana. Early settlers sent their farm crops to market on flatboats. Sometimes the boats went as far as New Orleans at the mouth of the Mississippi River. Abraham Lincoln once made a trip from Rockport to New Orleans on a flatboat loaded with tobacco. A steamboat appeared on the Ohio River for the first time in 1811. Steamboats could go upstream as easily as downstream. They carried passengers and freight of all kinds. At night the passengers slept in bunks on the boat. Music was often provided to entertain the passengers. It was not long until steamboats were common on the Ohio and Mississippi rivers. Many famous steamboats were built in Jeffersonville, Indiana. Not all the rivers of Indiana were deep enough for steamboats. Once a steamboat made its way up White River to Indianapolis, but there it got stuck in shallow water. Flatboats had to be used on the small rivers. Men not living along the rivers in Indiana asked the state to dig canals or deep ditches to connect the big rivers in Indiana so that they could send their crops to market by waterways. Three long canals were planned, following rivers that were not deep enough for large boats. One canal connected Fort Wayne with Terre Haute, and then went to Evansville. This canal linked the Maumee River with the Ohio River.
    [Show full text]
  • Backcountry Robbers, River Pirates, and Brawling Boatmen: Transnational Banditry in Antebellum U.S
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2018 Backcountry Robbers, River Pirates, and Brawling Boatmen: Transnational Banditry in Antebellum U.S. Frontier Literature Samuel M. Lackey University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Lackey, S. M.(2018). Backcountry Robbers, River Pirates, and Brawling Boatmen: Transnational Banditry in Antebellum U.S. Frontier Literature. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/4656 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Backcountry Robbers, River Pirates, and Brawling Boatmen: Transnational Banditry in Antebellum U.S. Frontier Literature by Samuel M. Lackey Bachelor of Arts University of South Carolina, 2006 Bachelor of Arts University of South Carolina, 2006 Master of Arts College of Charleston, 2009 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2018 Accepted by: Gretchen Woertendyke, Major Professor David Greven, Committee Member David Shields, Committee Member Keri Holt, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Samuel M. Lackey, 2018 All Rights Reserved. ii Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank my parents for all of their belief and support. They have always pushed me forward when I have been stuck in place. To my dissertation committee – Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Idea Is an Absurd One:” Steaming Against the Current Two Centuries Ago
    “The Idea Is AN ABSURD One:” STEAMING AGAINST THE CURRENT TWO CENTURIES AGO By Richard Campanella Tulane School of Architecture The advent of steamboats in the 1810s effectively ended the problem of contra-current navigation, and made sail- and oar- powered keelboats all but obsolete on the main arteries of the West. Flatboats, however, were so cost-effective—cheap to build and mobilized gratis by the current—that they coexisted symbiotically with steamboats for nearly half a century, as depicted in this detail of Bound Down the River by Currier & Ives (1870). Courtesy Library of Congress. The political Americanization of Louisiana the city’s thousands of wooden cottages, and smaller chez, as sharp meanders reversed wind directions, commenced as the ink dried on the Louisiana Pur- planks ended up in the ubiquitous picket fences lin- narrow river widths precluded tacking, and shallow chase in 1803. Demographic, cultural and economic ing the muddy streets of outlying faubourgs. banks endangered deep-draft hulls. Others rigged integration into the United States, however, did not The problem for the river men now was how to re- keelboats with horses, tethering the unfortunate gain momentum until the 1810s, in large part be- turn upriver, against the current. Getting from New beasts to poles geared to paddles or trotting them cause of a technological resolution to an age-old Orleans to Natchez usually entailed a vessel called awkwardly on deck-based treadmills. problem: contra-current navigation. a “keelboat,” a large canoe-like craft with multiple The solution to the upriver problem emerged Shipping downriver in the 18th century was no oarsmen, a sail and towlines.
    [Show full text]
  • Western River Commerce in the Early 1800S
    Appendix A: Western River Commerce in the Early 1800s ~ Americans in the Ohio and Mississippi river valleys ~ Routes to market ~ West- ern river craft ~ The flatboat ~ “Cutting loose” ~ Life on board ~ Flatboat trav- el ~ Flatboat cargo ~ The keelboat ~ The steamboat ~ Voyage of the New Or- leans ~ The new West ~ Western river trade in Lincoln’s era ~ The flatboatman in Lincoln’s era Orleans~ Only three out of every hundred U.S. citizens lived in the Mississippi Valley in 1790, a time when most of that vast basin belonged to Spain. Those emigrants—numbering 117,572, plus 14,338 people of African ancestry,New mostly enslaved—generally used Fort Pitt (Pittsburgh) or the CumberlandCampanella Gap as their gatewayamazon.com into the trans-AppalachianOrleans region. The first wave settled in the uppermost Ohio River Valley, nearest to the young nation’s hearth. Those who ventured farther west into Kentucky incould justly be described as pioneers, living independently on the frontier and exchanging locally to survive.on Rates of westward migration increased in the 1790s with the establishment of the Lancaster Turnpike across the Alleghany Mountains and the defeat of Indian resistance in the Ohio Val- ley. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, and Louisville emergedNew as theCampanella premier urban nodes along the Ohio River gateway to the West.1 amazon.com The stroke of a pen in 1803 expanded the United States’ western bor- der from the Mississippi River to the Continentalin Divide. Settlers subse- Richardquently headed into the lands of the Louisiana Purchase at a rate of tens of thousands perorder year, pushing out Indian occupants via deals, deception,on disease, vice, and violence.
    [Show full text]