DOCSLIB.ORG

Saratoga National Historical Park Amphibian and Reptile Inventory March-September 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Saratoga National Historical Park Amphibian and Reptile Inventory March-September 2001 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Saratoga National Historical Park Amphibian and Reptile Inventory March-September 2001 Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NETN/NRTR—2012/562 Saratoga National Historical Park Amphibian and Reptile Inventory March-September 2001 Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NETN/NRTR—2012/562 Robert P. Cook1, David K. Brotherton2, Brad C. Timm3, and John L. Behler2 1 National Park Service Cape Cod National Seashore Wellfleet, MA 02667 2 Department of Herpetology Wildlife Conservation Society Bronx Zoo Bronx, NY 10460-1099 3 Department of Environmental Conservation University of Massachusetts, Amherst Amherst, MA 01003 March 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received formal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data, and whose background and expertise put them on par technically and scientifically with the authors of the information. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available from the Northeast Temperate Network website (http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/units/netn/) and the Natural Resource Publications Management website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/nrpm/). Please cite this publication as: Cook, R. P., D. K. Brotherton, B. C. Timm, and J. L. Behler. 2012. Saratoga National Historical Park amphibian and reptile inventory: March-September 2001. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NETN/NRTR—2012/562. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 374/113257, March 2012 ii Contents Page Figures........................................................................................................................................... vii Tables ........................................................................................................................................... viii Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ x Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... xii Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Area ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Methods........................................................................................................................................... 5 Sampling Overview ................................................................................................................. 5 Marking, Measurement, and Aging/Sexing of Captured Animals .......................................... 5 Anuran Calling Surveys (ACS) .......................................................................................... 9 Egg Mass Counts (EMC) .................................................................................................. 10 Time-constrained Search (TCS) ....................................................................................... 10 Stream TCS ....................................................................................................................... 10 Woodland TCS.................................................................................................................. 11 Field TCS .......................................................................................................................... 11 Pond TCS .......................................................................................................................... 12 Coverboards (CB) ............................................................................................................. 12 Turtle Trap Surveys (TTS) ................................................................................................ 13 Minnow Trap Surveys (MTS) ........................................................................................... 13 Incidental Encounters (IE) ................................................................................................ 14 Quantifying Overall Abundance ....................................................................................... 14 Environmental Variables .................................................................................................. 15 Data Management ............................................................................................................. 15 iii Contents (continued) Page Results ........................................................................................................................................... 17 Overview of Park Herpetofauna ............................................................................................ 17 Survey Method Summaries ........................................................................................................... 29 Anuran Calling Surveys ......................................................................................................... 29 Egg Mass Counts ................................................................................................................... 29 Time-constrained Search ....................................................................................................... 35 Stream TCS ....................................................................................................................... 35 Woodland/Field TCS ........................................................................................................ 35 Pond TCS .......................................................................................................................... 35 Coverboards ........................................................................................................................... 42 Turtle Trap Surveys ............................................................................................................... 42 Minnow Trap Surveys ........................................................................................................... 46 Incidental Encounters ............................................................................................................ 46 Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 51 Community Analysis, Factors Affecting Species Presence and Absence, and Important Habitats ................................................................................................................. 51 Species at Risk ....................................................................................................................... 56 Population Trends .................................................................................................................. 56 Stressors ................................................................................................................................. 59 Recommendations for Management and Future Inventory and Monitoring ................................ 65 Monitor/Prevent/Mitigate External Threats and Stressors .................................................... 65 Monitor/Prevent/Mitigate Internal Threats and Stressors ...................................................... 65 Maintain Habitat Diversity .................................................................................................... 65 iv Contents (continued) Page Minimize Direct Mortality From Mowing Operations .......................................................... 66 Minimize Direct Mortality From Vehicles ............................................................................ 66 Additional Inventory and Monitoring .................................................................................... 67 Species Accounts: Species Likely Present Historically at or Adjacent to Saratoga NHP..............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AMPHIBIANS of OHIO F I E L D G U I D E DIVISION of WILDLIFE INTRODUCTION
    AMPHIBIANS OF OHIO f i e l d g u i d e DIVISION OF WILDLIFE INTRODUCTION Amphibians are typically shy, secre- Unlike reptiles, their skin is not scaly. Amphibian eggs must remain moist if tive animals. While a few amphibians Nor do they have claws on their toes. they are to hatch. The eggs do not have are relatively large, most are small, deli- Most amphibians prefer to come out at shells but rather are covered with a jelly- cately attractive, and brightly colored. night. like substance. Amphibians lay eggs sin- That some of these more vulnerable spe- gly, in masses, or in strings in the water The young undergo what is known cies survive at all is cause for wonder. or in some other moist place. as metamorphosis. They pass through Nearly 200 million years ago, amphib- a larval, usually aquatic, stage before As with all Ohio wildlife, the only ians were the first creatures to emerge drastically changing form and becoming real threat to their continued existence from the seas to begin life on land. The adults. is habitat degradation and destruction. term amphibian comes from the Greek Only by conserving suitable habitat to- Ohio is fortunate in having many spe- amphi, which means dual, and bios, day will we enable future generations to cies of amphibians. Although generally meaning life. While it is true that many study and enjoy Ohio’s amphibians. inconspicuous most of the year, during amphibians live a double life — spend- the breeding season, especially follow- ing part of their lives in water and the ing a warm, early spring rain, amphib- rest on land — some never go into the ians appear in great numbers seemingly water and others never leave it.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 43Rd Annual National Conference of the American Association of Zoo Keepers, Inc
    Proceedings of the 43rd Annual National Conference of the American Association of Zoo Keepers, Inc. September 19th – 23rd Papers Table of Contents Papers Click on the Title to View the Paper Tuesday, September 20th Making a Difference with AAZK’s Bowling for Rhinos Patty Pearthree, AAZK, Inc Bowling for Rhino: The Evolution of Lewa Wildlife Conservancy and Conservation and Development Impact Ruwaydah Abdul-Rahman, Lewa Wildlife Conservancy Indonesian Rhinos: Bowling for Rhinos is Conserving the Most Critically Endangered Mammals on Earth CeCe Sieffert, International Rhino Foundation Action for Cheetas in Kenya: Technology for a National Cheeta Survey Mary Wykstra, Action for Cheetas in Kenya Thursday, September 22nd Reintroduction of orphaned white rhino (Ceratotherium simum simum) calves Matthew Lamoreaux &Clarice Brewer, White Oak Conservation Holdings, LLC Use of fission-fusion to decrease aggression in a family group of western lowland gorillas David Minich and Grace Maloy, Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden Case Study: Medical Management of an Infant Mandrill at the Houston Zoo Ashley Kramer, Houston Zoo, Inc. Coolio, the Elephant Seal in the ‘burgh Amanda Westerlund, Pittsburgh Zoo &PPG Aquarium Goose’s Tale: The Story of how a One-Legged Lemur Gained a Foothold on Life Catlin Kenney, Lemur Conservation Foundation A Syringe Full of Banana Helps the Medicine Go Down: Syringe Training of Captive Giraffe David Bachus, Lion Country Safari Sticking my Neck out for Giraffe, a Keepers journey to Africa to help conserve giraffe Melaina Wallace, Disney’s Animal Kingdom Eavesdropping on Tigers: How Zoos are Building the World’s First Acoustic Monitoring Network for Wild Tiger Populations Courtney Dunn & Emily Ferlemann, The Prusten Project Sending out a Tapir SOS: Connecting guests with conservation John Scaramucci & Mary Fields, Houston Zoo, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Salamanders of Tennessee
    Salamanders of Tennessee: modified from Lisa Powers tnwildlife.org Follow links to Nongame The Salamanders of Tennessee Photo by John White Salamanders are the group of tailed, vertebrate animals that along with frogs and caecilians make up the class Amphibia. Salamanders are ectothermic (cold-blooded), have smooth glandular skin, lack claws and must have a moist environment in which to live. 1 Amphibian Declines Worldwide, over 200 amphibian species have experienced recent population declines. Scientists have reports of 32 species First discovered in 1967, the golden extinctions, toad, Bufo periglenes, was last seen mainly species of in 1987. frogs. Much attention has been given to the Anurans (frogs) in recent years, however salamander populations have been poorly monitored. Photo by Henk Wallays Fire Salamander - Salamandra salamandra terrestris 2 Why The Concern For Salamanders in Tennessee? Their key role and high densities in many forests The stability in their counts and populations Their vulnerability to air and water pollution Their sensitivity as a measure of change The threatened and endangered status of several species Their inherent beauty and appeal as a creature to study and conserve. *Possible Factors Influencing Declines Around the World Climate Change Habitat Modification Habitat Fragmentation Introduced Species UV-B Radiation Chemical Contaminants Disease Trade in Amphibians as Pets *Often declines are caused by a combination of factors and do not have a single cause. Major Causes for Declines in Tennessee Habitat Modification -The destruction of natural habitats is undoubtedly the biggest threat facing amphibians in Tennessee. Housing, shopping center, industrial and highway construction are all increasing throughout the state and consequently decreasing the amount of available habitat for amphibians.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Hellbender Symposium Agenda
    Mississippi Museum of Natural Science 2148 Riverside Drive, Jackson, Mississippi June 19-21, 2017 Page 1 Artwork for the symposium logo was kindly provided by the Mississippi Museum of Natural Science’s in-house artist, Sam Beibers. You are welcome to use this illustration as long as it is not used for resale in any capacity. Please credit its use with the following: "Illustration: Sam Beibers". IF you need illustrations for any of your own projects, you may contact Sam at 601-826-9256 or [email protected]. In this illustration, Sam Beibers wanted to take a "color challenged" animal in situ and push those colors brighter than they normally would be. "I wanted the hellbender to have something of a regal look. Afterall, they are 'superstars' to many of us in the scientific community." The final illustration was painted in watercolor on thin, clay-coated bristol board. As the paint dries on a smooth surface that is not very porous, the paint tends to "sit" on the surface instead of soaking in. Therefore it often dries in visible puddles. Pencil was used to add some detail and emphasize some areas of shade. Beibers grew up in rural northwest Mississippi. Like most boys, he enjoyed catching tadpoles, building huts, and swinging on grapevines. After one miserable year of wildlife biology studies at junior college, he changed his major to art and has since gone on to paint and draw hundreds of flora and fauna illustrations, as well as landscapes, cityscapes, and portraits. He received his MA at Mississippi College. Page 2 The following sponsors (and/or representatives from these institutions) helped make this symposium a success.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian Annual Report
    amphibian survival alliance Annual Report FY2018 saving amphibians together © Robin Moore www.amphibians.org 1 The Amphibian Survival Alliance would like to give special to thanks the following organizations and individuals: This report and the work of ASA is dedicated to the memory of Dr. George B. Rabb (1930–2017). www.amphibians.org 2 Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations 4 A Message from the Amphibian Survival Alliance 5 Introduction 6 News from the ASA Partnership 8 Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust Madagascar Fauna and Flora Group Detroit Zoological Society Defenders of Wildlife Endangered Wildlife Trust Global Wildlife Conservation Rainforest Trust Reptile, Amphibian and Fish Conservation the Netherlands Synchronicity Earth Zoological Society of London News from the ASA Secretariat 25 General Amphibian Diseases and Disease Mitigation Key Biodiversity Areas Communications News from ASA Advisors 31 Amphibian Ark IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group Annual expenditure 34 Donor acknowledgment 37 Global Council 39 ASA Secretariat 40 ASA Partners 41 www.amphibians.org 3 Acronyms and Abbreviations Amphibian Ark AArk Amphibian Red List Authority ARLA Amphibian Specialist Group ASG Amphibian Survival Alliance ASA Amphibian Survival Alliance Global Council ASA GC Conservation Planning Specialist Group CPSG Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust Durrell European Association of Zoos and Aquaria EAZA Endangered Wildlife Trust EWT Global Wildlife Conservation GWC Key Biodiversity Areas KBA Madagascar Flora and Fauna MFG Rainforest Trust
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians
    STANDARD COMMON AND CURRENT SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR NORTH AMERICAN AMPHIBIANS, TURTLES, REPTILES & CROCODILIANS Sixth Edition Joseph T. Collins TraVis W. TAGGart The Center for North American Herpetology THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY www.cnah.org Joseph T. Collins, Director The Center for North American Herpetology 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 (785) 393-4757 Single copies of this publication are available gratis from The Center for North American Herpetology, 1502 Medinah Circle, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 USA; within the United States and Canada, please send a self-addressed 7x10-inch manila envelope with sufficient U.S. first class postage affixed for four ounces. Individuals outside the United States and Canada should contact CNAH via email before requesting a copy. A list of previous editions of this title is printed on the inside back cover. THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY BO A RD OF DIRE ct ORS Joseph T. Collins Suzanne L. Collins Kansas Biological Survey The Center for The University of Kansas North American Herpetology 2021 Constant Avenue 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Kelly J. Irwin James L. Knight Arkansas Game & Fish South Carolina Commission State Museum 915 East Sevier Street P. O. Box 100107 Benton, Arkansas 72015 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Walter E. Meshaka, Jr. Robert Powell Section of Zoology Department of Biology State Museum of Pennsylvania Avila University 300 North Street 11901 Wornall Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Kansas City, Missouri 64145 Travis W. Taggart Sternberg Museum of Natural History Fort Hays State University 3000 Sternberg Drive Hays, Kansas 67601 Front cover images of an Eastern Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) and Cajun Chorus Frog (Pseudacris fouquettei) by Suzanne L.
    [Show full text]
  • Necturus Maculosus) in Southeast Ohio Using Environmental DNA
    Searching for a Salamander: Distribution and Habitat of the Common Mudpuppy (Necturus maculosus) in Southeast Ohio Using Environmental DNA A thesis presented to the faculty of the Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science Merri K. Collins August 2017 © 2017 Merri K. Collins. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled Searching for a Salamander: Distribution and Habitat of the Common Mudpuppy (Necturus maculosus) in Southeast Ohio Using Environmental DNA by MERRI K. COLLINS has been approved for the Program of Environmental Studies and the Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs by Shawn R. Kuchta Associate Professor of Biological Sciences Mark Weinberg Dean, Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs 3 ABSTRACT COLLINS MERRI K., M.S., August 2017, Environmental Studies Searching for a Salamander: Distribution and Habitat of the Common Mudpuppy (Necturus maculosus) in Southeast Ohio Using Environmental DNA Director of Thesis: Shawn R. Kuchta Habitat destruction and anthropogenic drivers have led to a decline of amphibian populations worldwide, but the conservation status of many species remains in question. Environmental DNA is a new monitoring methodology that non-invasively detects the presence of imperiled, rare, and secretive species. Although the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) to detect species presence is increasing, it is not often paired with habitat data. This study focuses on the declining Common Mudpuppy salamander, Necturus maculosus. I conducted both traditional and eDNA field surveys at 10 stream sites located in Southeastern Ohio. I detected the presence of Mudpuppies at 6 of 10 streams using eDNA.
    [Show full text]
  • A1-Amphibians & Reptiles
    Appendix A1 Amphibian & Reptile SGCN Conservation Reports Wildlife Action Plan 2015 Species ............................................ page Jefferson Salamander .............................. 2 Blue-spotted Salamander ........................ 9 Spotted Salamander .............................. 16 Four-toed Salamander .......................... 23 Mudpuppy ............................................ 30 Fowler's Toad ....................................... 39 Boreal Chorus Frog ................................ 48 Spotted Turtle ....................................... 55 Wood Turtle .......................................... 61 Eastern Musk Turtle .............................. 68 Spiny Softshell Turtle ............................. 72 Common Five-lined Skink ...................... 80 North American Racer ........................... 86 Eastern Ratsnake .................................. 92 Common Watersnake ............................ 98 DeKay's Brownsnake ........................... 104 Eastern Ribbonsnake ........................... 109 Smooth Greensnake ............................ 114 Timber Rattlesnake ............................. 120 Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Action Plan - Revision 2015 Species Conservation Report Common Name: Jefferson Salamander Scientific Name: Ambystoma jeffersonianum Species Group: Herp Conservation Assessment Final Assessment: High Priority Global Rank: G4 Global Trend: State Rank: S2 State Trend: Unknown Extirpated in VT? No Regional SGCN? Yes Assessment Narrative: Jefferson Salamander
    [Show full text]
  • Necturus Maculosus) Presence Along the St
    Eastern Michigan University DigitalCommons@EMU Master's Theses, and Doctoral Dissertations, and Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations Graduate Capstone Projects 2019 Assessment of mudpuppy (Necturus maculosus) presence along the St. Clair-Detroit River System using environmental DNA and occupancy modeling Jenny L. Sutherland Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.emich.edu/theses Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Sutherland, Jenny L., "Assessment of mudpuppy (Necturus maculosus) presence along the St. Clair-Detroit River System using environmental DNA and occupancy modeling" (2019). Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations. 974. https://commons.emich.edu/theses/974 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses, and Doctoral Dissertations, and Graduate Capstone Projects at DigitalCommons@EMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@EMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Assessment of Mudpuppy (Necturus maculosus) Presence along the St. Clair-Detroit River System using Environmental DNA and Occupancy Modeling by Jenny L. Sutherland Thesis Submitted to the Department of Biology Eastern Michigan University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Biology Ecology and Organismal Biology Thesis Committee: Katherine Greenwald, Ph.D., Chair Steve Francoeur, Ph.D. Kristin Judd, Ph.D. March 15, 2019 Ypsilanti, Michigan Abstract The mudpuppy (Necturus maculosus) is cryptic, fully aquatic salamander within the Great Lakes region. Once abundant throughout its range, evidence now suggests that there have been declines due to habitat loss and lampricide use.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACTS 29 Reptile Ecology I, Highland A, Sunday 15 July 2018
    THE JOINT MEETING OF ASIH SSAR HL lcHTHYOLOGISTS & HERPETOLOGISTS ROCHESTER, NEW YORK 2018 ABSTRACTS 29 Reptile Ecology I, Highland A, Sunday 15 July 2018 Curtis Abney, Glenn Tattersall and Anne Yagi Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada Thermal Preference and Habitat Selection of Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis in a Southern Ontario Peatland Gartersnakes represent the most widespread reptile in North America. Despite occupying vastly different biogeoclimatic zones across their range, evidence suggests that the thermal preferenda (Tset) of gartersnakes has not diverged significantly between populations or different Thamnophis species. The reason behind gartersnake success could lie in their flexible thermoregulatory behaviours and habitat selection. We aimed to investigate this relationship by first identifying the Tset of a common gartersnake species (Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis) via a thermal gradient. We then used this Tset parameter as a baseline for calculating the thermal quality of an open, mixed, and forested habitat all used by the species. We measured the thermal profiles of these habitats by installing a series of temperature-recording analogues that mimicked the reflectance and morphology of living gartersnakes and recorded environmental temperatures as living snakes experience them. Lastly, we used coverboards to survey the current habitat usage of T. s. sirtalis. Of the three habitats, we found that the open habitat offered the highest thermal quality throughout the snake’s active season. In contrast, we recorded the greatest number of snakes using the mixed habitat which had considerably lower thermal quality. Although the open habitat offered the greatest thermal quality, we regularly recorded temperatures exceeding the upper range of the animals’ thermal preference.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Selection and Host Detection in the Salamander Mussel, Simpsonaias Ambigua
    BearWorks MSU Graduate Theses Spring 2020 Habitat Selection and Host Detection in the Salamander Mussel, Simpsonaias ambigua Eric A. Stegmann Missouri State University, [email protected] As with any intellectual project, the content and views expressed in this thesis may be considered objectionable by some readers. However, this student-scholar’s work has been judged to have academic value by the student’s thesis committee members trained in the discipline. The content and views expressed in this thesis are those of the student-scholar and are not endorsed by Missouri State University, its Graduate College, or its employees. Follow this and additional works at: https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons, Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Stegmann, Eric A., "Habitat Selection and Host Detection in the Salamander Mussel, Simpsonaias ambigua" (2020). MSU Graduate Theses. 3494. https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/3494 This article or document was made available through BearWorks, the institutional repository of Missouri State University. The work contained in it may be protected by copyright and require permission of the copyright holder for reuse or redistribution. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HABITAT SELECTION AND HOST DETECTION IN THE SALAMANDER MUSSEL, SIMPSONAIAS AMBIGUA A Master’s Thesis Presented to The Graduate College of Missouri State University TEMPLATE In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science, Biology By Eric Stegmann May 2020 HABITAT SELECTION AND HOST DETECTION IN THE SALAMANDER MUSSEL, SIMPSONAIAS AMBIGUA Biology Missouri State University, May 2020 Master of Science Eric Stegmann ABSTRACT The native freshwater mussels, Order Unionida, have suffered many species extinctions and loss of abundance.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetological Review
    Herpetological Review Volume 39, Number 2 — June 2008 SSAR Officers (2008) HERPETOLOGICAL REVIEW President The Quarterly News-Journal of the Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles ROY MCDIARMID USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center Editor National Museum of Natural History ROBERT W. HANSEN Washington, DC 20560, USA 16333 Deer Path Lane Clovis, California 93619-9735, USA President-elect [email protected] BRIAN CROTHER Department of Biological Sciences Southeastern Louisiana University Associate Editors Hammond, Louisiana 70402, USA ROBERT E. ESPINOZA CHRISTOPHER A. PHILLIPS DEANNA H. OLSON California State University, Northridge Illinois Natural History Survey USDA Forestry Science Lab Secretary MARION R. PREEST ROBERT N. REED MICHAEL S. GRACE R. BRENT THOMAS Joint Science Department USGS Fort Collins Science Center Florida Institute of Technology Emporia State University The Claremont Colleges Claremont, California 91711, USA EMILY N. TAYLOR GUNTHER KÖHLER MEREDITH J. MAHONEY California Polytechnic State University Forschungsinstitut und Illinois State Museum Naturmuseum Senckenberg Treasurer KIRSTEN E. NICHOLSON Section Editors Department of Biology, Brooks 217 Central Michigan University Book Reviews Current Research Current Research Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48859, USA AARON M. BAUER JOSHUA M. HALE BEN LOWE e-mail: [email protected] Department of Biology Department of Sciences Department of Biology Villanova University MuseumVictoria, GPO Box 666 San Diego State University Publications Secretary Villanova, Pennsylvania 19085, USA Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia San Diego, California 92182, USA BRECK BARTHOLOMEW [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] P.O. Box 58517 Geographic Distribution Geographic Distribution Geographic Distribution Salt Lake City, Utah 84158, USA ALAN M. RICHMOND INDRANEIL DAS JERRY D.
    [Show full text]