A Stromal Region of Cytochrome B6f Subunit IV Is Involved in the Activation of the Stt7 Kinase in Chlamydomonas
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Light-Induced Psba Translation in Plants Is Triggered by Photosystem II Damage Via an Assembly-Linked Autoregulatory Circuit
Light-induced psbA translation in plants is triggered by photosystem II damage via an assembly-linked autoregulatory circuit Prakitchai Chotewutmontria and Alice Barkana,1 aInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 Edited by Krishna K. Niyogi, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved July 22, 2020 (received for review April 26, 2020) The D1 reaction center protein of photosystem II (PSII) is subject to mRNA to provide D1 for PSII repair remain obscure (13, 14). light-induced damage. Degradation of damaged D1 and its re- The consensus view in recent years has been that psbA transla- placement by nascent D1 are at the heart of a PSII repair cycle, tion for PSII repair is regulated at the elongation step (7, 15–17), without which photosynthesis is inhibited. In mature plant chloro- a view that arises primarily from experiments with the green alga plasts, light stimulates the recruitment of ribosomes specifically to Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Chlamydomonas) (18). However, we psbA mRNA to provide nascent D1 for PSII repair and also triggers showed recently that regulated translation initiation makes a a global increase in translation elongation rate. The light-induced large contribution in plants (19). These experiments used ribo- signals that initiate these responses are unclear. We present action some profiling (ribo-seq) to monitor ribosome occupancy on spectrum and genetic data indicating that the light-induced re- cruitment of ribosomes to psbA mRNA is triggered by D1 photo- chloroplast open reading frames (ORFs) in maize and Arabi- damage, whereas the global stimulation of translation elongation dopsis upon shifting seedlings harboring mature chloroplasts is triggered by photosynthetic electron transport. -
Evolution of Photochemical Reaction Centres
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/502450; this version posted December 20, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Evolution of photochemical reaction 2 centres: more twists? 3 4 Tanai Cardona, A. William Rutherford 5 Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK 6 Correspondence to: [email protected] 7 8 Abstract 9 The earliest event recorded in the molecular evolution of photosynthesis is the structural and 10 functional specialisation of Type I (ferredoxin-reducing) and Type II (quinone-reducing) reaction 11 centres. Here we point out that the homodimeric Type I reaction centre of Heliobacteria has a Ca2+- 12 binding site with a number of striking parallels to the Mn4CaO5 cluster of cyanobacterial 13 Photosystem II. This structural parallels indicate that water oxidation chemistry originated at the 14 divergence of Type I and Type II reaction centres. We suggests that this divergence was triggered by 15 a structural rearrangement of a core transmembrane helix resulting in a shift of the redox potential 16 of the electron donor side and electron acceptor side at the same time and in the same redox direction. 17 18 Keywords 19 Photosynthesis, Photosystem, Water oxidation, Oxygenic, Anoxygenic, Reaction centre 20 21 Evolution of Photosystem II 22 There is no consensus on when and how oxygenic photosynthesis originated. Both the timing and the 23 evolutionary mechanism are disputed. -
Etude Des Sources De Carbone Et D'énergie Pour La Synthèse Des Lipides De Stockage Chez La Microalgue Verte Modèle Chlamydo
Aix Marseille Université L'Ecole Doctorale 62 « Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé » Etude des sources de carbone et d’énergie pour la synthèse des lipides de stockage chez la microalgue verte modèle Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Yuanxue LIANG Soutenue publiquement le 17 janvier 2019 pour obtenir le grade de « Docteur en biologie » Jury Professor Claire REMACLE, Université de Liège (Rapporteuse) Dr. David DAUVILLEE, CNRS Lille (Rapporteur) Professor Stefano CAFFARRI, Aix Marseille Université (Examinateur) Dr. Gilles PELTIER, CEA Cadarache (Invité) Dr. Yonghua LI-BEISSON, CEA Cadarache (Directeur de thèse) 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor Dr. Yonghua Li-Beisson for the continuous support during my PhD study and also gave me much help in daily life, for her patience, motivation and immense knowledge. I could not have imagined having a better mentor. I’m also thankful for the opportunity she gave me to conduct my PhD research in an excellent laboratory and in the HelioBiotec platform. I would also like to thank another three important scientists: Dr. Gilles Peltier (co- supervisor), Dr. Fred Beisson and Dr. Pierre Richaud who helped me in various aspects of the project. I’m not only thankful for their insightful comments, suggestion, help and encouragement, but also for the hard question which incented me to widen my research from various perspectives. I would also like to thank collaboration from Fantao, Emmannuelle, Yariv, Saleh, and Alisdair. Fantao taught me how to cultivate and work with Chlamydomonas. Emmannuelle performed bioinformatic analyses. Yariv, Saleh and Alisdair from Potsdam for amino acid analysis. -
Chapter 3 the Title and Subtitle of This Chapter Convey a Dual Meaning
3.1. Introduction Chapter 3 The title and subtitle of this chapter convey a dual meaning. At first reading, the subtitle Photosynthetic Reaction might seem to indicate that the topic of the structure, function and organization of Centers: photosynthetic reaction centers is So little time, so much to do exceedingly complex and that there is simply insufficient time or space in this brief article to cover the details. While this is John H. Golbeck certainly the case, the subtitle is Department of Biochemistry additionally meant to convey the idea that there is precious little time after the and absorption of a photon to accomplish the Molecular Biology task of preserving the energy in the form of The Pennsylvania State University stable charge separation. University Park, PA 16802 USA The difficulty is there exists a fundamental physical limitation in the amount of time available so that a photochemically induced excited state can be utilized before the energy is invariably wasted. Indeed, the entire design philosophy of biological reaction centers is centered on overcoming this physical, rather than chemical or biological, limitation. In this chapter, I will outline the problem of conserving the free energy of light-induced charge separation by focusing on the following topics: 3.2. Definition of the problem: the need to stabilize a charge-separated state. 3.3. The bacterial reaction center: how the cofactors and proteins cope with this problem in a model system. 3.4. Review of Marcus theory: what governs the rate of electron transfer in proteins? 3.5. Photosystem II: a variation on a theme of the bacterial reaction center. -
Lecture Inhibition of Photosynthesis Inhibition at Photosystem I
1 Lecture Inhibition of Photosynthesis Inhibition at Photosystem I 1. General Information The popular misconception is that susceptible plants treated with these herbicides “starve to death” because they can no longer photosynthesize. In actuality, the plants die long before the food reserves are depleted. The photosynthetic inhibitors can be divided into two distinct groups, the inhibitors of Photosystem I and inhibitors of Photosystem II. Both of these groups work in the energy production step of photosynthesis, or the light reactions. Light is required as well as photosynthesis for these herbicides to kill susceptible plants. Herbicides that inhibit Photosystem I are considered to be contact herbicides and are often referred to as membrane disruptors. The end result is that cell membranes are rapidly destroyed resulting in leakage of cell contents into the intercellular spaces. These herbicides act as “electron interceptors” or “electron thieves” within Photosystem I of the light reaction of photosynthesis. They divert electrons from the normal electron transport sequence necessary in Photosystem I. This in turn inhibits photosynthesis. The membrane disruption occurs as a result of secondary responses. Herbicides that inhibit Photosystem I are represented by only one family, the bipyridyliums. See chemical structure shown under herbicide families. These molecules are cationic (positively charged) and are therefore highly water soluble. Their cationic properties also make them highly adsorbed to soil colloids resulting in no soil activity. 2. Mode of Action See Figure 7.1 (The electron transport chain in photosynthesis and the sites of action of herbicides that interfere with electron transfer in this chain (Q = electron acceptor; PQ = plastoquinone). -
Itraq-Based Proteome Profiling Revealed the Role of Phytochrome A
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN iTRAQ‑based proteome profling revealed the role of Phytochrome A in regulating primary metabolism in tomato seedling Sherinmol Thomas1, Rakesh Kumar2,3, Kapil Sharma2, Abhilash Barpanda1, Yellamaraju Sreelakshmi2, Rameshwar Sharma2 & Sanjeeva Srivastava1* In plants, during growth and development, photoreceptors monitor fuctuations in their environment and adjust their metabolism as a strategy of surveillance. Phytochromes (Phys) play an essential role in plant growth and development, from germination to fruit development. FR‑light (FR) insensitive mutant (fri) carries a recessive mutation in Phytochrome A and is characterized by the failure to de‑etiolate in continuous FR. Here we used iTRAQ‑based quantitative proteomics along with metabolomics to unravel the role of Phytochrome A in regulating central metabolism in tomato seedlings grown under FR. Our results indicate that Phytochrome A has a predominant role in FR‑mediated establishment of the mature seedling proteome. Further, we observed temporal regulation in the expression of several of the late response proteins associated with central metabolism. The proteomics investigations identifed a decreased abundance of enzymes involved in photosynthesis and carbon fxation in the mutant. Profound accumulation of storage proteins in the mutant ascertained the possible conversion of sugars into storage material instead of being used or the retention of an earlier profle associated with the mature embryo. The enhanced accumulation of organic sugars in the seedlings indicates the absence of photomorphogenesis in the mutant. Plant development is intimately bound to the external light environment. Light drives photosynthetic carbon fxa- tion and activates a set of signal-transducing photoreceptors that regulate plant growth and development. -
Chlorophyll Biosynthesis
Chlorophyll Biosynthesis: Various Chlorophyllides as Exogenous Substrates for Chlorophyll Synthetase Jürgen Benz and Wolfhart Rüdiger Botanisches Institut, Universität München, Menziger Str. 67, D-8000 München 19 Z. Naturforsch. 36 c, 51 -5 7 (1981); received October 10, 1980 Dedicated to Professor Dr. H. Merxmüller on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday Chlorophyllides a and b, Protochlorophyllide, Bacteriochlorophyllide a, 3-Acetyl-3-devinylchlo- rophyllide a, Pyrochlorophyllide a, Pheophorbide a The esterification of various chlorophyllides with geranylgeranyl diphosphate was investigated as catalyzed by the enzyme chlorophyll synthetase. The enzyme source was an etioplast membrane fraction from etiolated oat seedlings ( Avena sativa L.). The following chlorophyllides were prepared from the corresponding chlorophylls by the chlorophyllase reaction: chlorophyllide a (2) and b (4), bacteriochlorophyllide a (5), 3-acetyl-3-devinylchlorophyllide a (6), and pyro chlorophyllide a (7). The substrates were solubilized with cholate which reproducibly reduced the activity of chlorophyll synthetase by 40-50%. It was found that the following compounds were good substrates for chlorophyll synthetase: chlorophyllide a and b, 3-acetyl-3-devinylchloro- phyllide a, and pyrochlorophyllide a. Only a poor or no reaction was found with protochloro phyllide, pheophorbide a, and bacteriochlorophyllide. This difference of reactivity was not due to distribution differences of the substrates between solution and pelletable membrane fraction. Furthermore, no interference between good and poor substrate was detected. Structural features necessary for chlorophyll synthetase substrates were discussed. Introduction Therefore no exogenous 2 was applied. The only substrate was 2 formed by photoconversion of endo The last steps of chlorophyll a (Chi a) biosynthe genous Protochlide (1) in the etioplast membrane. -
Supplementary Material Title Comparative Proteomic Analysis Of
Supplementary Material Title Comparative proteomic analysis of wild-type Physcomitrella patens and an OPDA-deficient Physcomitrella patens mutant with disrupted PpAOS1 and PpAOS2 genes after wounding Authors Weifeng Luoa, Setsuko Komatsub, Tatsuya Abea, Hideyuki Matsuuraa, and Kosaku Takahashia,c* Affiliations aResearch Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 606-8589, Japan bDepartment of Environmental and Food Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Information Sciences, Fukui University of Technology, 3-6-1 Gakuen, Fukui 910-8505, Japan cDepartment of Nutritional Science, Faculty of Applied BioScience, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 165-8502, Japan. *To whom correspondence should be addressed: Tel.: +81-3-5477-2679; E-mail: [email protected]. Supplementary Fig. S1. Fig. S1. Disruption of PpAOS1 and PpAOS2 genes in P. p a te ns . A, Genomic structures of PpAOS1 and PpAOS2 in the wild-type and targeted PpAOS1 and PpAOS2 knock-out mutants (A5, A19, and A22). The npt II and aph IV expression cassettes were inserted in A5, A19, and A22 strains. B, Genomic PCR data of wild-type, and A5, A19 and A22 strains. P. patens genomic DNA was isolated from protonemata by the CTAB method (Nishiyama et al., Ref. 32). PCR was performed in 50 µL of a reaction mixture containing 1 µL of genomic DNA solution, 1.5 µL of each primer (5 µM), 25 µL of KOD One PCR Master Mix (Toyobo, Japan), and 21 µL of Milli-Q water. PCR was conducted with the following conditions: 30 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 58°C for 5 s, and 68°C for 15 s. -
Bilirubin: an Animal Pigment in the Zingiberales and Diverse Angiosperm Orders Cary L
Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 11-5-2010 Bilirubin: an Animal Pigment in the Zingiberales and Diverse Angiosperm Orders Cary L. Pirone Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI10122201 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Biochemistry Commons, and the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Pirone, Cary L., "Bilirubin: an Animal Pigment in the Zingiberales and Diverse Angiosperm Orders" (2010). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 336. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/336 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida BILIRUBIN: AN ANIMAL PIGMENT IN THE ZINGIBERALES AND DIVERSE ANGIOSPERM ORDERS A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in BIOLOGY by Cary Lunsford Pirone 2010 To: Dean Kenneth G. Furton College of Arts and Sciences This dissertation, written by Cary Lunsford Pirone, and entitled Bilirubin: An Animal Pigment in the Zingiberales and Diverse Angiosperm Orders, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. ______________________________________ Bradley C. Bennett ______________________________________ Timothy M. Collins ______________________________________ Maureen A. Donnelly ______________________________________ John. T. Landrum ______________________________________ J. Martin Quirke ______________________________________ David W. Lee, Major Professor Date of Defense: November 5, 2010 The dissertation of Cary Lunsford Pirone is approved. -
Coexistence of Phycoerythrin and a Chlorophyll A/B Antenna in a Marine Prokaryote (Prochlorophyta/Cyanobacteria/Phycobilins/Photosynthesis/Endosymbiosis) WOLFGANG R
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 11126-11130, October 1996 Microbiology Coexistence of phycoerythrin and a chlorophyll a/b antenna in a marine prokaryote (Prochlorophyta/cyanobacteria/phycobilins/photosynthesis/endosymbiosis) WOLFGANG R. HESs*t, FREDEIRIC PARTENSKYt, GEORG W. M. VAN DER STAAYI, JOSE' M. GARCIA-FERNANDEZt, THOMAS BORNER*, AND DANIEL VAULOTt *Department of Biology, Humboldt-University, Chausseestrasse 117, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; and tStation Biologique de Roscoff, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unite Propre de Recherche 9042 and Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, BP 74, F-29682 Roscoff Cedex, France Communicated by Hewson Swift, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, July 1Z 1996 (received for review June 7, 1996) ABSTRACT Prochlorococcus marinus CCMP 1375, a ubiq- tation maximum of the major chromophore bound by PE-III uitous and ecologically important marine prochlorophyte, corresponds to that of phycourobilin. was found to possess functional genes coding for the a and 1 subunits of a phycobiliprotein. The latter is similar to phy- coerythrins (PE) from marine Synechococcus cyanobacteria MATERIALS AND METHODS and bind a phycourobilin-like pigment as the major chro- Flow Cytometric Measurements. Sea water samples were mophore. However, differences in the sequences of the ca and collected at different depths during the France-Joint Global 13 chains compared with known PE subunits and the presence Ocean Flux Study OLIPAC cruise held in November 1994 of a single bilin attachment site on the a subunit designate it aboard the N.O. l'Atalante. Samples were analyzed immedi- as a novel PE type, which we propose naming PE-III. P. ately using a FACScan (Becton Dickinson) flow cytometer and marinus is the sole prokaryotic organism known so far that cell concentrations of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus contains chlorophylls a and b as well as phycobilins. -
Quantify Chlorophyll a and Chlorophyll B with a Custom Method
APPLICATION NOTE NanoDrop One/OneC No. T141 Quantify chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b with a custom method Using the NanoDrop One Spectrophotometer Abstract Scientists can accurately quantify chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b on the Thermo Scientific™ NanoDrop™ One/OneC Microvolume UV-Vis Spectrophotometer using a user-defined custom method. Introduction Chlorophyll a is the principal pigment that converts light energy to chemical energy, and chlorophyll b is the accessory photosynthetic pigment that transfers light it absorbs to chlorophyll a. Chlorophyll a is found in all plants, green algae, and cyanobacteria, and chlorophyll b is found in plants and green algae. Chlorophyll quantitation is valuable in a vast array of disciplines including but not limited to plant biology, environmental science, ecotoxicology, disease prevention, and medical drug discovery. Spectrophotometry is a common method used to measure the absorbance of light by the chlorophyll molecules. The NanoDrop One/OneC UV-Vis Spectrophotometer can be used to measure the absorbance of chlorophyll. Chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b absorb light at slightly different wavelengths. peaks (Figure 1). With this information, a user-defined Chlorophyll a absorbs light at 433 nm and 666 nm custom method including user-defined formulas can be and chlorophyll b absorbs light at 462 nm and 650 created to measure the absorbance and determine the nm. The NanoDrop One/OneC UV-Vis application can concentration of chlorophyll. be used to observe the spectrum of each chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b and identify major absorbance chlorophyll a Figure 2. Chlorophyll Content custom method created to quantify chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b samples suspended in 100% DMSO. -
Greencut Protein CPLD49 of Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii Associates with Thylakoid Membranes and Is Required for Cytochrome B6f Complex Accumulation
The Plant Journal (2018) 94, 1023–1037 doi: 10.1111/tpj.13915 GreenCut protein CPLD49 of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii associates with thylakoid membranes and is required for cytochrome b6f complex accumulation Tyler M. Wittkopp1,2,† , Shai Saroussi2,† , Wenqiang Yang2 , Xenie Johnson3 , Rick G. Kim1,2 , Mark L. Heinnickel2, James J. Russell1, Witchukorn Phuthong4 , Rachel M. Dent5,6 , Corey D. Broeckling7 , Graham Peers8 , Martin Lohr9 , Francis-Andre Wollman10 , Krishna K. Niyogi5,6 and Arthur R. Grossman2,* 1Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, 2Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, 3Laboratoire de Bioenerg etique et Biotechnologie des Bacteries et Microalgues, CEA Cadarache, Saint Paul lez Durance, France, 4Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, 5Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720- 3102, USA, 6Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, 7Proteomics and Metabolomics Facility, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA, 8Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA, 9Institut fur€ Molekulare Physiologie – Pflanzenbiochemie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat,€ 55099 Mainz, Germany, and 10Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, CNRS-UPMC, Paris, France Received 27 October 2017; revised 23 February 2018; accepted 6 March 2018; published online 30 March 2018. *For correspondence (e-mail [email protected]). †These authors contributed equally to this work. SUMMARY The GreenCut encompasses a suite of nucleus-encoded proteins with orthologs among green lineage organ- isms (plants, green algae), but that are absent or poorly conserved in non-photosynthetic/heterotrophic organisms.